Chester Bednar Rental Realty, Washington, PA; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 2941 [E8-594]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 16, 2008 / Notices
2941
Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
January, 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–589 Filed 1–15–08; 8:45 am]
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of
January 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–594 Filed 1–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
BILLING CODE 4510–FW–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request; they will
also become a matter of public record.
Dated: January 9, 2008.
Cheryl Atkinson,
Administrator, Office of Workforce Security.
[FR Doc. E8–626 Filed 1–15–08; 8:45 am]
[TA–W–62,507]
Employment and Training
Administration
Chester Bednar Rental Realty,
Washington, PA; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
[TA–W–62,184, TA–W–62,184A]
Mark Eyelet, Inc. Including On-Site
Leased Workers of Jaci Carroll
Staffing, Watertown, CT; Ozzi II, Inc.
(DBA OC Eyelet) Including On-Site
Leased Workers of Watertown, CT;
Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated December 7,
2007, a company official requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department of Labor’s Notice of
Negative Determination Regarding
Eligibility to Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance, applicable to
workers and former workers of the
subject firm. The denial notice was
signed on October 31, 2007 and
published in the Federal Register on
November 15, 2007 (72 FR 64247).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
finding that imports of eyelet parts and
miniature stamping did not contribute
importantly to worker separations at the
subject firms and no shift of production
to a foreign source occurred.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner provided additional
information concerning subject firm’s
customers.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record and therefore the
Department will conduct further
investigation to determine if the workers
meet the eligibility requirements of the
Trade Act of 1974.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. The application
is, therefore, granted.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:55 Jan 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
By application dated December 19,
2007, a company official requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department’s negative determination
regarding eligibility for workers and
former workers of Chester Bednar Rental
Realty, Washington, Pennsylvania
(subject firm) to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA). The determination
was issued on December 11, 2007, and
the Department’s Notice of negative
determination was published in the
Federal Register on December 31, 2007
(72 FR 74344). The subject workers are
engaged in buying, renting, repairing,
and selling single family homes.
The TAA/ATAA petition was denied
because the subject firm did not
separate or threaten to separate a
significant number or proportion of
workers as required by Section 222 of
the Trade Act of 1974. Significant
number or proportion of the workers in
a firm or appropriate subdivision means
at least three workers in a workforce of
fewer than 50 workers, five percent of
the workers in a workforce of over 50
workers, or at least 50 workers.
In the request for reconsideration, the
company official implied that the
subject firm had ‘‘cash employees.’’ The
request for reconsideration did not
provide any documentation to support
the position that the subject firm had
more than three employees.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and has determined that the Department
will conduct further investigation.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[TA–W–60,252; TA–W–60,252F; TA–W–
60,252G]
Shogren Hosiery Manufacturing Co.,
Inc., Including Leased Workers of
Corestaff, Concord, NC; Including
Employees of Shogren Hosiery
Manufacturing Co., Inc., Concord, NC,
Located at the Following Locations:
Staten Island, NY and New York, NY;
Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance on November 16,
2006, applicable to workers of Shogren
Hosiery Manufacturing Co., Inc.,
including leased workers of Corestaff,
Concord, North Carolina. The notice
was published soon in the Federal
Register on November 28, 2006 (71 FR
68840).
At the request of a company official,
the Department reviewed the
certification for workers of the subject
firm.
New information shows that worker
separations have occurred involving
employees of the Concord, North
Carolina facility of Shogren Hosiery
Manufacturing Co., Inc., controlled out
of the Concord facility but working from
locations in Staten Island, New York
and New York, New York. These
employees provided customer liaison
and sales functions in support of the
production of women’s hosiery and
tights produced at the Concord, North
Carolina location of the subject firm.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include employees of the
Concord, North Carolina facility of
Shogren Hosiery Manufacturing Co.,
Inc. working out of the above mentioned
locations.
E:\FR\FM\16JAN1.SGM
16JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 2941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-594]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-62,507]
Chester Bednar Rental Realty, Washington, PA; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated December 19, 2007, a company official
requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of
Chester Bednar Rental Realty, Washington, Pennsylvania (subject firm)
to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The determination was issued on December
11, 2007, and the Department's Notice of negative determination was
published in the Federal Register on December 31, 2007 (72 FR 74344).
The subject workers are engaged in buying, renting, repairing, and
selling single family homes.
The TAA/ATAA petition was denied because the subject firm did not
separate or threaten to separate a significant number or proportion of
workers as required by Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Significant number or proportion of the workers in a firm or
appropriate subdivision means at least three workers in a workforce of
fewer than 50 workers, five percent of the workers in a workforce of
over 50 workers, or at least 50 workers.
In the request for reconsideration, the company official implied
that the subject firm had ``cash employees.'' The request for
reconsideration did not provide any documentation to support the
position that the subject firm had more than three employees.
The Department has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and has determined that the Department will conduct
further investigation.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of January 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-594 Filed 1-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
