Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Valley, Alabama; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Albertville, Minnesota; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Allen, Texas; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Birch Run, Michigan; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Birmingham, Alabama; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Boaz, Alabama; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Burlington, North Carolina; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Cabazon, California; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Clinton, Connecticut; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Columbus, Georgia; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Commerce, Georgia; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Dalton, Georgia; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Dawsonville, Georgia; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Destin, Florida; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Edinburgh, Indiana; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Ellenton, Florida; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Fairburn, Georgia; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stor, 1898-1899 [E8-261]
Download as PDF
1898
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2008 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
[TA–W–62,357; TA–W–62,357A; TA–W–
62,357B; TA–W–62,357C; TA–W–62,357D;
TA–W–62,357E; TA–W–62,357F; TA–W–
62,357G; TA–W–62,357H; TA–W–62,357I;
TA–W–62,357J; TA–W–62,357K; TA–W–
62,357L; TA–W–62,357M; TA–W–62,357N;
TA–W–62,357O; TA–W–62,357P; TA–W–
62,357Q; TA–W–62,357R; TA–W–62,357S;
TA–W–62,357T; TA–W–62,357U; TA–W–
62,357V; TA–W–62,357W; TA–W–62,357X;
TA–W–62,357Y; TA–W–62,357Z; TA–W–
62,357AA; TA–W–62,357BB; TA–W–
62,357CC]
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Valley, Alabama; Westpoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, Albertville, Minnesota;
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Allen, Texas; Westpoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, Birch Run, Michigan;
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Birmingham, Alabama; Westpoint
Home, Inc., Stores Division, Boaz,
Alabama; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Burlington, North Carolina;
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Cabazon, California; Westpoint Home,
Inc., Stores Division, Clinton,
Connecticut; Westpoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, Columbus, Georgia;
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Commerce, Georgia; Westpoint Home,
Inc., Stores Division, Dalton, Georgia;
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Dawsonville, Georgia; Westpoint
Home, Inc., Stores Division, Destin,
Florida; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Edinburgh, Indiana;
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Ellenton, Florida; Westpoint Home,
Inc., Stores Division, Fairburn,
Georgia; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Foley, Alabama; Westpoint
Home, Inc., Stores Division, Howell,
Michigan; Westpoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, Lamarque, Texas;
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Lumberton, North Carolina; Westpoint
Home, Inc., Stores Division, New
Braunfels, Texas; Westpoint Home,
Inc., Stores Division, Park City, Utah;
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Pigeon Forge, Tenessee; Westpoint
Home, Inc., Stores Division, San
Marcos, Texas; Westpoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, Sarasota, Florida;
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
St. Augustine, Florida; Westpoint
Home, Inc., Stores Division, Valdosta,
Georgia; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Williamsburg, Va; Westpoint
Home, Inc., Stores Division, Wrentham,
Massachusetts; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:29 Jan 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
By application dated December 17,
2007, the company official requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department’s negative determination
regarding eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA),
applicable to workers and former
workers of the subject firm. The denial
notice was signed on October 29, 2007
and published in the Federal Register
on December 11, 2007 (72 FR 70346).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or
of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The negative TAA determination
issued by the Department for workers of
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Valley, Alabama (TA–W–62,357),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Albertville, Minnesota (TA–W–
62,357A), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Allen, Texas (TA–W–
62,357B), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Birch Run, Michigan (TA–W–
62,357C), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Birmingham, Alabama (TA–
W–62,357D), WestPoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, Boaz, Alabama (TA–W–
62,357E), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Burlington, North Carolina
(TA–W–62,357F), WestPoint Home,
Inc., Stores Division, Cabazon,
California (TA–W–62,357G), WestPoint
Home, Inc., Stores Division, Clinton,
Connecticut (TA–W–62,357H),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Columbus, Georgia (TA–W–62,357I),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Commerce, Georgia (TA–W–62,357J),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Dalton, Georgia (TA–W–63,257K),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Dawsonville, Georgia (TA–W–62,357L),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Destin, Florida (TA–W–62,357M),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Edinburgh, Indiana (TA–W–62,357N),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Ellenton, Florida (TA–W–62,357O),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Fairburn, Georgia (TA–W–62,357P),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Foley, Alabama (TA–W–62,357Q),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Howell, Michigan (TA–W–62,357R),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
LaMarque, Texas (TA–W–62,357S),
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Lumberton, North Carolina (TA–W–
62,357T), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, New Braunfels, Texas (TA–W–
62,357U), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Park City, Utah (TA–62,357V),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Pigeon Forge, Tennessee (TA–W–
62,357W), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, San Marcos, Texas (TA–W–
62,357X), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Sarasota, Florida (TA–W–
62,357Y), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, St. Augustine, Florida (TA–
W–62,357Z), WestPoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, Valdosta, Georgia (TA–
W–62,357AA), WestPoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, Williamsburg, Virginia
(TA–W–62,357BB), and WestPoint
Home, Inc., Stores Division, Wrentham,
Massachusetts (TA–W–62,357CC) was
based on the finding that the worker
group does not produce an article
within the meaning of Section 222 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
The petitioner states that the workers
of the subject firm ‘‘assured the
manufacturing facilities could continue
operations with consistent running of
shifts avoiding expenses involved with
start up and shut down of the plants
including costs incurred for
unemployment’’. The petitioner further
states that the subject firm’s primary
business was selling WestPoint Home’s
home fashions bed and bath products
manufactured in the United States. The
petitioner alleges that because domestic
manufacturing of fashion bed and bath
products has been import impacted,
workers of the subject firm who retail
these products should be certified
eligible for TAA.
The investigation revealed that
workers of WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division are engaged in activities at
retail factory outlet stores that include
stocking merchandise, customer service,
sales transactions, managerial staff,
human resources and distribution
services. These functions, as described
above, are not considered production of
an article within the meaning of section
222 of the Trade Act.
The petitioner also alleges that
WestPoint Home began operations in
Bahrain and Pakistan and that multiple
production facilities of WestPoint Home
have been certified eligible for TAA.
The allegation of a shift to another
country might be relevant if it was
determined that workers of the subject
firm produced an article. However, the
investigation determined that workers of
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division
do not produce an article within the
meaning of section 222 of the Trade Act
of 1974.
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
1899
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2008 / Notices
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
January 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–261 Filed 1–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT
CORPORATION
Neighborworks America Regular
Board of Directors Meeting; Sunshine
Act
10 a.m., Thursday,
January 10, 2008.
PLACE: 1325 G Street, NW., Suite 800,
Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.
STATUS: Open.
TIME AND DATE:
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate
Secretary, (202) 220–2376;
ehall@nw.org.
AGENDA:
I. Call To Order.
II. Approval of the Minutes.
III. Summary Report of the Finance,
Budget and Program Committee.
IV. Summary Report of the Audit
Committee.
V. Summary Report of the Audit
Committee.
VI. Summary Report of the Corporate
Administration Committee.
VII. Summary Report of the Finance,
Budget and Program Committee.
VIII. Summary Report of the Corporate
Administration Committee.
IX. Summary Report of the Audit
Committee.
X. Financial Report.
XI. Corporate Socrecard.
XII. Chief Executive Officer’s Quarterly
Management Report.
XIII. Appropriations Update.
XIV. Additional Appropriations—
Mortgage Foreclosure Mitigation.
XV. Field Operations Presentation.
XVI. Adjournment.
Erica Hall,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 08–73 Filed 1–8–08; 11:56 am]
BILLING CODE 7570–02–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:29 Jan 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737,
or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Notice of Availability of Interim Staff
Guidance Documents for Spent Fuel
Storage Casks
Interim staff guidance documents
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Gordon, Structural Mechanics
and Materials Branch, Division of Spent
Fuel Storage and Transportation
Division, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20005–0001. Telephone: (301) 492–
3331; fax number: (301) 492–3342; email: mxg9@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) is preparing and issuing Revision
1 to the Interim Staff Guidance (ISG)–18
document for ‘‘The Design and Testing
of Lid Welds on Austenitic Stainless
Steel Canisters as Confinement
Boundary for Spent Fuel Storage.’’ This
ISG document provides clarifying
guidance to the NRC staff when
reviewing licensee integrated safety
analyses, license applications or
amendment requests, or other related
licensing activities for dry cask storage
systems under 10 CFR Part 72. The NRC
is soliciting public comments on the
Draft of ISG–18, Revision 1, which will
be considered in the final version or
subsequent revisions.
II. Summary
The purpose of this notice is to
provide the public with an opportunity
to review and comment on the Draft of
ISG–18, Revision 1, ‘‘The Design and
Testing of Lid Welds on Austenitic
Stainless Steel Canisters as Confinement
Boundary for Spent Fuel Storage.’’
III. Further Information
Documents related to this action are
available electronically at the NRC’s
Electronic Reading Room at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
From this site, you can access the NRC’s
Agencywide Document Access and
Management System (ADAMS), which
provides text and image files of NRC’s
public documents. The ADAMS
accession numbers for the documents
related to this notice are provided in the
following table. If you do not have
access to ADAMS or if there are
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, contact the NRC
Public Document Room (PDR) reference
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Draft of Interim Staff Guidance–18, Revision 1.
Draft of Interim Staff Guidance–18, Revision 1 Enclosed Sketches A&B.
ADAMS Accession No.
ML072410351
ML072410352
These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers
located at the NRC’s PDR, O–1 F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy
documents for a fee. Comments and
questions on ISG–18, Revision 1, should
be directed to Matthew Gordon,
Structural Mechanics and Materials
Branch, Division of Spent Fuel Storage
and Transportation, Office of Nuclear
Materials Safety and Safeguards, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20005–0001 by
February 25, 2008. Comments received
after this date will be considered if it is
practical to do so, but assurance of
consideration cannot be given to
comments received after this date.
Comments can also be submitted by
telephone, fax, or e-mail to the
following: Telephone: (301) 492–3331;
fax number: (301) 492–3331; e-mail:
mxg9@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 3rd day
of January, 2008.
For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
Christopher M. Regan,
Chief, Structural Mechanics and Materials
Branch, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and
Transportation, Office of Nuclear Materials
Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E8–269 Filed 1–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request for Review of a
Revised Information Collection:
RI 94–7
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104–13, May 22, 1995), this notice
announces that the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) has submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request for review of a revised
information collection. RI 94–7, Death
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 7 (Thursday, January 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1898-1899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-261]
[[Page 1898]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-62,357; TA-W-62,357A; TA-W-62,357B; TA-W-62,357C; TA-W-62,357D;
TA-W-62,357E; TA-W-62,357F; TA-W-62,357G; TA-W-62,357H; TA-W-62,357I;
TA-W-62,357J; TA-W-62,357K; TA-W-62,357L; TA-W-62,357M; TA-W-62,357N;
TA-W-62,357O; TA-W-62,357P; TA-W-62,357Q; TA-W-62,357R; TA-W-62,357S;
TA-W-62,357T; TA-W-62,357U; TA-W-62,357V; TA-W-62,357W; TA-W-62,357X;
TA-W-62,357Y; TA-W-62,357Z; TA-W-62,357AA; TA-W-62,357BB; TA-W-
62,357CC]
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Valley, Alabama; Westpoint
Home, Inc., Stores Division, Albertville, Minnesota; Westpoint Home,
Inc., Stores Division, Allen, Texas; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Birch Run, Michigan; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Birmingham, Alabama; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Boaz,
Alabama; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Burlington, North
Carolina; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Cabazon, California;
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Clinton, Connecticut; Westpoint
Home, Inc., Stores Division, Columbus, Georgia; Westpoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, Commerce, Georgia; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Dalton, Georgia; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Dawsonville, Georgia; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Destin,
Florida; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Edinburgh, Indiana;
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Ellenton, Florida; Westpoint
Home, Inc., Stores Division, Fairburn, Georgia; Westpoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, Foley, Alabama; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Howell, Michigan; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Lamarque,
Texas; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Lumberton, North
Carolina; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, New Braunfels, Texas;
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Park City, Utah; Westpoint Home,
Inc., Stores Division, Pigeon Forge, Tenessee; Westpoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, San Marcos, Texas; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Sarasota, Florida; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, St.
Augustine, Florida; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Valdosta,
Georgia; Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Williamsburg, Va;
Westpoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Wrentham, Massachusetts; Notice
of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated December 17, 2007, the company official
requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the
subject firm. The denial notice was signed on October 29, 2007 and
published in the Federal Register on December 11, 2007 (72 FR 70346).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The negative TAA determination issued by the Department for workers
of WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Valley, Alabama (TA-W-
62,357), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Albertville, Minnesota
(TA-W-62,357A), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Allen, Texas
(TA-W-62,357B), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Birch Run,
Michigan (TA-W-62,357C), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Birmingham, Alabama (TA-W-62,357D), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Boaz, Alabama (TA-W-62,357E), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Burlington, North Carolina (TA-W-62,357F), WestPoint Home,
Inc., Stores Division, Cabazon, California (TA-W-62,357G), WestPoint
Home, Inc., Stores Division, Clinton, Connecticut (TA-W-62,357H),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Columbus, Georgia (TA-W-
62,357I), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Commerce, Georgia (TA-
W-62,357J), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Dalton, Georgia (TA-
W-63,257K), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Dawsonville, Georgia
(TA-W-62,357L), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Destin, Florida
(TA-W-62,357M), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Edinburgh,
Indiana (TA-W-62,357N), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Ellenton, Florida (TA-W-62,357O), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Fairburn, Georgia (TA-W-62,357P), WestPoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, Foley, Alabama (TA-W-62,357Q), WestPoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, Howell, Michigan (TA-W-62,357R), WestPoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, LaMarque, Texas (TA-W-62,357S), WestPoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division, Lumberton, North Carolina (TA-W-62,357T), WestPoint
Home, Inc., Stores Division, New Braunfels, Texas (TA-W-62,357U),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Park City, Utah (TA-62,357V),
WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Pigeon Forge, Tennessee (TA-W-
62,357W), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, San Marcos, Texas (TA-
W-62,357X), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, Sarasota, Florida
(TA-W-62,357Y), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division, St. Augustine,
Florida (TA-W-62,357Z), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores Division,
Valdosta, Georgia (TA-W-62,357AA), WestPoint Home, Inc., Stores
Division, Williamsburg, Virginia (TA-W-62,357BB), and WestPoint Home,
Inc., Stores Division, Wrentham, Massachusetts (TA-W-62,357CC) was
based on the finding that the worker group does not produce an article
within the meaning of Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
The petitioner states that the workers of the subject firm
``assured the manufacturing facilities could continue operations with
consistent running of shifts avoiding expenses involved with start up
and shut down of the plants including costs incurred for
unemployment''. The petitioner further states that the subject firm's
primary business was selling WestPoint Home's home fashions bed and
bath products manufactured in the United States. The petitioner alleges
that because domestic manufacturing of fashion bed and bath products
has been import impacted, workers of the subject firm who retail these
products should be certified eligible for TAA.
The investigation revealed that workers of WestPoint Home, Inc.,
Stores Division are engaged in activities at retail factory outlet
stores that include stocking merchandise, customer service, sales
transactions, managerial staff, human resources and distribution
services. These functions, as described above, are not considered
production of an article within the meaning of section 222 of the Trade
Act.
The petitioner also alleges that WestPoint Home began operations in
Bahrain and Pakistan and that multiple production facilities of
WestPoint Home have been certified eligible for TAA.
The allegation of a shift to another country might be relevant if
it was determined that workers of the subject firm produced an article.
However, the investigation determined that workers of WestPoint Home,
Inc., Stores Division do not produce an article within the meaning of
section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
[[Page 1899]]
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of January 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-261 Filed 1-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P