Electric Mobility Corporation, Sewell, NJ; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 1897 [E8-259]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2008 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
January 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–260 Filed 1–9–08; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,355]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Hawley Products Incorporated,
Paducah, Kentucky; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application dated December 12,
2007, a company official requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department’s Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance applicable to workers and
former workers of the subject firm. The
negative determination was issued on
November 8, 2007, and the
Department’s Notice of negative
determination was published in the
Federal Register on November 21, 2007
(72 FR 65607). The subject workers are
engaged in the production of
loudspeaker cones.
The determination was based on the
Department’s findings that subject firm
sales and production of loudspeaker
cones increased from January through
September 2007 compared with the
same period in 2006. During the
relevant period, the subject firm did not
import loudspeaker cones or shift
production of loudspeaker cones
abroad.
In the request for reconsideration, the
company official stated that subject firm
production had decreased during the
relevant period and is closing.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and has determined that the Department
will conduct further investigation.
Conclusion
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:29 Jan 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
1897
subject firm has increased from October
2006 to September 2007.
As employment levels at the subject
facility did not decline and there was no
threat of separations during the relevant
period. Therefore, criterion
(a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) have
not been met.
Should conditions change in the
future, the petitioner is encouraged to
file a new petition on behalf of the
worker group which will encompass an
investigative period that will include
these changing conditions.
[TA–W–62,243]
Conclusion
Electric Mobility Corporation, Sewell,
NJ; Notice of Negative Determination
on Reconsideration
After reconsideration, I affirm the
original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of Electric
Mobility Corporation, Sewell, New
Jersey.
On November 26, 2007, the
Department issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of the subject firm. The
notice was published in the Federal
Register on December 3, 2007 (72 FR
67965–67966).
The TAA petition, which was filed on
behalf of workers at Electric Mobility
Corporation, Sewell, New Jersey,
engaged in the production of mobility
chairs was denied based on the findings
that during the relevant time period, the
subject company did not separate or
threaten to separate a significant
number or proportion of workers, as
required by section 222 of the Trade Act
of 1974.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner states that there were sixteen
workers laid off from the subject firm in
May, 2007.
In determining whether there were a
significant proportion of workers
separated or threatened with separations
at the subject company during the
relevant time period, the Department
contacted the subject firm’s company
official and requested employment
figures for the relevant employment data
(for one year prior to the date of the
petition and any imminent layoffs).
After careful review of the
information provided on
reconsideration, it was revealed that
workers were laid off from the subject
firm during the relevant time period.
However, overall employment at the
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of
December, 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–259 Filed 1–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,592]
J.H.L. Fashion Inc., New York, NY;
Notice of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on December
20, 2007 in response to a petition filed
by workers of J.H.L. Fashion Inc., New
York, New York.
The petition does not contain three
valid worker signatures; therefore, the
petition itself is invalid. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of
December 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8–256 Filed 1–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 7 (Thursday, January 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 1897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-259]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-62,243]
Electric Mobility Corporation, Sewell, NJ; Notice of Negative
Determination on Reconsideration
On November 26, 2007, the Department issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers
and former workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the
Federal Register on December 3, 2007 (72 FR 67965-67966).
The TAA petition, which was filed on behalf of workers at Electric
Mobility Corporation, Sewell, New Jersey, engaged in the production of
mobility chairs was denied based on the findings that during the
relevant time period, the subject company did not separate or threaten
to separate a significant number or proportion of workers, as required
by section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner states that
there were sixteen workers laid off from the subject firm in May, 2007.
In determining whether there were a significant proportion of
workers separated or threatened with separations at the subject company
during the relevant time period, the Department contacted the subject
firm's company official and requested employment figures for the
relevant employment data (for one year prior to the date of the
petition and any imminent layoffs).
After careful review of the information provided on
reconsideration, it was revealed that workers were laid off from the
subject firm during the relevant time period. However, overall
employment at the subject firm has increased from October 2006 to
September 2007.
As employment levels at the subject facility did not decline and
there was no threat of separations during the relevant period.
Therefore, criterion (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) have not been
met.
Should conditions change in the future, the petitioner is
encouraged to file a new petition on behalf of the worker group which
will encompass an investigative period that will include these changing
conditions.
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance
for workers and former workers of Electric Mobility Corporation,
Sewell, New Jersey.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of December, 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-259 Filed 1-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
