Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 1236-1238 [E8-3]
Download as PDF
1236
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 4 / Monday, January 7, 2008 / Notices
Postal Service analysts will describe the
model refinements that they have made,
the reasons that they made them, and
respond to questions from the
Commission’s technical staff and the
public designed to clarify the nature of,
and the reasons for, the Postal Service’s
changes to the model.
To allow further clarification once
interested persons have the benefit of
the Postal Service’s explanations, a
second conference is scheduled for
January 23, 2008 at 2 p.m. in the
Commission’s hearing room. At this
second conference, interested persons
may seek additional information from
Postal Service analysts, and explore the
reasons for the methodologies and data
employed by the Postal Service. At this
conference, interested persons may also,
if they wish, offer potential additional
improvements or alternatives for
discussion prior to submitting written
comments on the Postal Service’s filing.
Steven W. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–36 Filed 1–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Extension:
Rule 19b–7 and Form 19b–7; OMB Control
No. 3235–0553; SEC File No. 270–495.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
• Rule 19b–7 (17 CFR 240.19b–7) and
Form 19b–7—Filings with respect to
proposed rule changes submitted
pursuant to section 19(b)(7) of the Act.
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (‘‘Exchange Act’’)
provides a framework for self-regulation
under which various entities involved
in the securities business, including
national securities exchanges and
national securities associations
(collectively, self-regulatory
organizations or ‘‘SROs’’), have primary
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Jan 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
responsibility for regulating their
members or participants. The role of the
Commission in this framework is
primarily one of oversight: the Exchange
Act charges the Commission with
supervising the SROs and assuring that
each complies with and advances the
policies of the Exchange Act.
The Exchange Act was amended by
the Commodity Futures Modernization
Act of 2000 (‘‘CFMA’’). Prior to the
CFMA, federal law did not allow the
trading of futures on individual stocks
or on narrow-based stock indexes
(collectively, ‘‘security futures
products’’). The CFMA removed this
restriction and provides that trading in
security futures products would be
regulated jointly by the Commission and
the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (‘‘CFTC’’).
The Exchange Act requires all SROs
to submit to the SEC any proposals to
amend, add, or delete any of their rules.
Certain entities (Security Futures
Product Exchanges) would be national
securities exchanges only because they
trade security futures products.
Similarly, certain entities (Limited
Purpose National Securities
Associations) would be national
securities associations only because
their members trade security futures
products. The Exchange Act, as
amended by the CFMA, established a
procedure for Security Futures Product
Exchanges and Limited Purpose
National Securities Associations to
provide notice of proposed rule changes
relating to certain matters.1 Rule 19b–7
and Form 19b–7 implemented this
procedure.
The collection of information is
designed to provide the Commission
with the information necessary to
determine, as required by the Act,
whether the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Act and the rules
thereunder. The information is used to
determine if the proposed rule change
should remain in affect or abrogated.
The respondents to the collection of
information are SROs.
Five respondents file an average total
of 12, which corresponds to an
estimated annual response burden of
207 hours. At an average cost per
response of $4,607.25, the resultant total
related cost of compliance for these
respondents is $55,287 per year (12
1 These matters are higher margin levels, fraud or
manipulation, recordkeeping, reporting, listing
standards, or decimal pricing for security futures
products; sales practices for security futures
products for persons who effect transactions in
security futures products; or rules effectuating the
obligation of Security Futures Product Exchanges
and Limited Purpose National Securities
Associations to enforce the securities laws. See 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(7)(A).
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
responses × $4,607.25/response =
$55,287).
Compliance with Rule 19b–7 is
mandatory. Information received in
response to Rule 19b–7 shall not be kept
confidential; the information collected
is public information.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
estimates of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Comments should be directed to: R.
Corey Booth, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson,
6432 General Green Way, Alexandria,
Virginia 22312 or send an e-mail to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must
be submitted within 60 days of this
notice.
Dated: December 27, 2007.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–2 Filed 1–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Rule 10f–3; SEC File No. 270–237; OMB
Control No. 3235–0226.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collections of information
discussed below. The Commission plans
to submit this existing collection of
information to the Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for
extension and approval.
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 4 / Monday, January 7, 2008 / Notices
Section 10(f) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a)
(the ‘‘Act’’) prohibits a registered
investment company (‘‘fund’’) from
purchasing any security during an
underwriting or selling syndicate if the
fund has certain relationships with a
principal underwriter for the security.
Congress enacted this provision in 1940
to protect funds and their shareholders
by preventing underwriters from
‘‘dumping’’ unmarketable securities on
affiliated funds.
Rule 10f–3 permits a fund to engage
in a securities transaction that otherwise
would violate section 10(f) if, among
other things: (i) Each transaction
affected under the rule is reported on
Form N–SAR; (ii) the fund’s directors
have approved procedures for purchases
made in reliance on the rule, regularly
review fund purchases to determine
whether they comply with these
procedures, and approve necessary
changes to the procedures; and (iii) a
written record of each transaction
affected under the rule is maintained for
six years, the first two of which in an
easily accessible place.1 The written
record must state: (i) From whom the
securities were acquired; (ii) the identity
of the underwriting syndicate’s
members; (iii) the terms of the
transactions; and (iv) the information or
materials on which the fund’s board of
directors has determined that the
purchases were made in compliance
with procedures established by the
board.
The rule also conditionally allows
managed portions of fund portfolios to
purchase securities offered in otherwise
off-limits primary offerings. To qualify
for this exemption, rule 10f–3 requires
that the subadviser that is advising the
purchaser be contractually prohibited
from providing investment advice to
any other portion of the fund’s portfolio
and consulting with any other of the
fund’s advisers that is a principal
underwriter or affiliated person of a
principal underwriter concerning the
fund’s securities transactions.
These requirements provide a
mechanism for fund boards to oversee
compliance with the rule. The required
recordkeeping facilitates the
Commission staff’s review of rule
10f–3 transactions during routine fund
inspections and, when necessary, in
connection with enforcement actions.
The staff estimates that approximately
350 funds engage in a total of
approximately 4,400 rule 10f–3
transactions each year.2 Rule 10f–3
1 17
CFR 270.10f–3.
estimates are based on staff extrapolations
from filings with the Commission.
2 These
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Jan 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
requires that the purchasing fund create
a written record of each transaction that
includes, among other things, from
whom the securities were purchased
and the terms of the transaction. The
staff estimates 3 that it takes an average
fund approximately 30 minutes per
transaction and approximately 2,200
hours 4 in the aggregate to comply with
this portion of the rule.
The funds also must maintain and
preserve these transactional records in
accordance with the rule’s
recordkeeping requirement, and the staff
estimates that it takes a fund
approximately 20 minutes per
transaction and that annually, in the
aggregate, funds spend approximately
1,467 hours 5 to comply with this
portion of the rule.
In addition, fund boards must, no less
than quarterly, examine each of these
transactions to ensure that they comply
with the fund’s policies and procedures.
The information or materials upon
which the board relied to come to this
determination also must be maintained
and the staff estimates that it takes a
fund 1 hour per quarter and, in the
aggregate, approximately 1,400 hours 6
annually to comply with this rule
requirement.
The staff estimates that reviewing and
revising as needed written procedures
for rule 10f–3 transactions takes, on
average for each fund, two hours of a
compliance attorney’s time per year.7
Thus, annually, in the aggregate, the
staff estimates that funds spend a total
of approximately 700 hours 8 on
monitoring and revising rule 10f–3
procedures.
Based on an analysis of fund filings,
the staff estimates that approximately
600 fund portfolios enter into
subadvisory agreements each year.9
Based on discussions with industry
3 Unless stated otherwise, the information
collection burden estimates contained in this
Supporting Statement are based on conversations
between the staff and representatives of funds.
4 This estimate is based on the following
calculation: (30 minutes × 4,400 = 2,200 hours).
5 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: (20 minutes × 4,400 transactions =
88,000 minutes; 88,000 minutes ÷ 60 = 1,467
hours).
6 This estimate is based on the following
calculation: (1 hour per quarter × 4 quarters × 350
funds = 1,400 hours).
7 These averages take into account the fact that in
most years, fund attorneys and boards spend little
or no time modifying procedures and in other years,
they spend significant time doing so.
8 This estimate is based on the following
calculation: (350 funds × 2 hours = 700 hours).
9 The use of subadvisers has grown rapidly over
the last several years, with approximately 600
portfolios that use subadvisers registering between
December 2005 and December 2006. Based on
information in Commission filings, we estimate that
31 percent of funds are advised by subadvisers.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1237
representatives, the staff estimates that
it will require approximately 3 attorney
hours to draft and execute additional
clauses in new subadvisory contracts in
order for funds and subadvisers to be
able to rely on the exemptions in rule
10f–3. Because these additional clauses
are identical to the clauses that a fund
would need to insert in their
subadvisory contracts to rely on rules
12d3–1, 17a–10, and 17e–1, and because
we believe that funds that use one such
rule generally use all of these rules, we
apportion this 3 hour time burden
equally to all four rules. Therefore, we
estimate that the burden allocated to
rule 10f–3 for this contract change
would be 0.75 hours.10 Assuming that
all 600 funds that enter into new
subadvisory contracts each year make
the modification to their contract
required by the rule, we estimate that
the rule’s contract modification
requirement will result in 450 burden
hours annually.11
The staff estimates, therefore, that rule
10f–3 imposes an information collection
burden of 6,217 hours.12 This estimate
does not include the time spent filing
transaction reports on Form N–SAR,
which is encompassed in the
information collection burden estimate
for that form.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the collections of information
are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information has practical utility; (b) the
accuracy of the Commission’s estimate
of the burdens of the collections of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burdens of the collections
of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Consideration
will be given to comments and
suggestions submitted in writing within
60 days of this publication.
Please direct your written comments
to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way,
Alexandria, VA, 22312; or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
10 This estimate is based on the following
calculation (3 hours ÷ 4 rules = .75 hours).
11 These estimates are based on the following
calculations: (0.75 hours × 600 portfolios = 450
burden hours).
12 This estimate is based on the following
calculation: (2,200 hours + 1,467 hours + 1,400
hours + 700 hours + 450 hours = 6,217 total burden
hours).
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
1238
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 4 / Monday, January 7, 2008 / Notices
Dated: December 27, 2007.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–3 Filed 1–4–08; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–57075; File No. SR–Phlx–
2007–75]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Order Granting Approval of Proposed
Rule Change as Modified by
Amendments No. 1 and 2 Thereto
Relating to Market Data Distribution
Network Fees
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to
the provisions of the Government in the
Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94–409, that the
Securities and Exchange Commission
will hold the following meeting during
the week of January 7, 2008:
A Closed Meeting will be held on
Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 2 p.m.
Commissioners, Counsel to the
Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries
will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain
staff members who have an interest in
the matters may also be present.
The General Counsel of the
Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or
more of the exemptions set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (9)(B), and
(10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7),
9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of
the scheduled matters at the Closed
Meeting.
Commissioner Casey, as duty officer,
voted to consider the items listed for the
closed meeting in closed session.
The subject matter of the Closed
Meeting scheduled for Thursday,
January 10, 2008 will be:
Formal orders of investigation;
Institution and settlement of injunctive
actions;
Institution and settlement of
administrative proceedings of an
enforcement nature; and
Matters related to enforcement
proceedings.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting items.
For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been
added, deleted or postponed, please
contact: The Office of the Secretary at
(202) 551–5400.
January 3, 2008.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–43 Filed 1–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Jan 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
December 31, 2007.
I. Introduction
On September 27, 2007, the
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposal to eliminate: (1)
A fee assessed by the Exchange’s wholly
owned subsidiary, the Philadelphia
Board of Trade (‘‘PBOT’’), for certain
equity index values that subscribers
receive over PBOT’s Market Data
Distribution Network (‘‘MDDN’’); 3 and
(2) a discount applicable to certain
market data vendors. Phlx filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change on November 7, 2007. The
proposed rule change, as amended, was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on November 28, 2007.4 On
December 14, 2007, Phlx filed
Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule
change.5 The Commission received no
comments regarding the proposal. This
order approves the proposed rule
change, as amended.
II. Description of the Proposal
Phlx licenses to PBOT the current and
closing index values underlying most of
Phlx’s proprietary indexes, and
Hapoalim Securities USA, Inc. licenses
to PBOT the current and closing
Hapoalim American Israeli IndexTM
(HAISM) values. PBOT distributes those
values over the MDDN. The Exchange or
its third-party designee calculates and
makes available to PBOT a real-time
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The MDDN is an Internet protocol multicast
network developed by PBOT and SAVVIS
Communications.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56827
(November 20, 2007), 72 FR 67334.
5 In Amendment No. 2, Phlx corrected Exhibit 5
to the Form 19b–4 it submitted to accurately reflect
the proposed deletions and additions of the rule
text. Phlx also clarified in footnote 1 of Exhibit 5
that the Administrative Fee deduction applies only
to the per-device fee and to Index Data. Because
Amendment No. 2 is technical in nature, it is not
subject to notice and comment.
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
value for each index every 15 seconds
during each trading day and a closing
index value at the end of the day. In
exchange for subscriber fees paid to
PBOT, market data vendors may receive
and widely disseminate this market data
to their subscribers.6
Presently, subscriber fees are assessed
in one of three ways: 7 (a) A monthly fee
of $1.00 per ‘‘Device’’ 8 that is used by
vendors and their subscribers to receive
and re-transmit market data on a realtime basis (‘‘device fee’’); (b) a fee of
$0.0025 per request for snapshot data,9
which is essentially market data that is
refreshed no more frequently than once
every 60 seconds, or $1,500 per month
for unlimited snapshot data requests
(‘‘snapshot fee’’); 10 or (c) an Enterprise
License Fee of $10,000 per year or $850
per month for unlimited real-time data
as an alternative to the device fee.11 All
vendors that provide market data to
200,000 or more Devices in any month
qualify for a 15% Administrative Fee
credit for that month, to be deducted
from the monthly Subscriber Fees that
they collect and are obligated to pay
6 PBOT has contracted with several major vendors
to receive real-time and closing index values over
the MDDN and promptly redistribute such values.
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53790
(May 11, 2006), 71 FR 28738 (May 17, 2006)
(‘‘Original Approval Order’’). The applicable
subscriber fees are set out in Vendor/Subvendor
Agreements that PBOT executed with various
market data vendors for the right to receive, store,
and retransmit the current and closing index values
transmitted over the MDDN.
8 The agreements provide that ‘‘Device’’ shall
mean, in case of each Subscriber and in such
Subscriber’s discretion, either any Terminal or any
End User. Devices may be exclusively Terminals,
exclusively End Users, or a combination of
Terminals or End Users, and shall be reported in
a manner that is consistent with the way the vendor
identifies such Subscriber’s access to vendor’s data.
An ‘‘End User’’ is defined as an individual
authorized or allowed by a vendor to access and
display real-time market data that is distributed by
PBOT over the MDDN; and a ‘‘Terminal’’ is any
type of equipment (fixed or portable) that accesses
and displays such market data.
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55111
(January 16, 2007), 72 FR 3188 (January 24, 2007)
(increasing the snapshot fee to $0.0025 per request).
10 The index values may also be made available
by vendors on a delayed basis (i.e., no sooner than
20 minutes following receipt of the data by vendors)
at no charge.
11 A vendor is eligible for the Enterprise License
Fee if it is a firm acting as a retail broker-dealer
conducting a material portion of its business via
one or more proprietary Internet Web sites by
which the firm distributes market data to
predominately non-professional market data users
with whom the firm has a brokerage relationship
(‘‘Eligible Firm’’). An Eligible Firm may also
distribute market data to professional users with
whom such firm has a brokerage relationship,
provided such market data distribution is
predominantly to non-professional users. The
Eligible Firm’s market data distribution to
professional users cannot exceed 10%. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55424 (March
8, 2007), 72 FR 12242 (March 15, 2007) (SR–Phlx–
2006–63).
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 4 (Monday, January 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1236-1238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-3]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.
Extension:
Rule 10f-3; SEC File No. 270-237; OMB Control No. 3235-0226.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collections
of information discussed below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
[[Page 1237]]
Section 10(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a)
(the ``Act'') prohibits a registered investment company (``fund'') from
purchasing any security during an underwriting or selling syndicate if
the fund has certain relationships with a principal underwriter for the
security. Congress enacted this provision in 1940 to protect funds and
their shareholders by preventing underwriters from ``dumping''
unmarketable securities on affiliated funds.
Rule 10f-3 permits a fund to engage in a securities transaction
that otherwise would violate section 10(f) if, among other things: (i)
Each transaction affected under the rule is reported on Form N-SAR;
(ii) the fund's directors have approved procedures for purchases made
in reliance on the rule, regularly review fund purchases to determine
whether they comply with these procedures, and approve necessary
changes to the procedures; and (iii) a written record of each
transaction affected under the rule is maintained for six years, the
first two of which in an easily accessible place.\1\ The written record
must state: (i) From whom the securities were acquired; (ii) the
identity of the underwriting syndicate's members; (iii) the terms of
the transactions; and (iv) the information or materials on which the
fund's board of directors has determined that the purchases were made
in compliance with procedures established by the board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 17 CFR 270.10f-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The rule also conditionally allows managed portions of fund
portfolios to purchase securities offered in otherwise off-limits
primary offerings. To qualify for this exemption, rule 10f-3 requires
that the subadviser that is advising the purchaser be contractually
prohibited from providing investment advice to any other portion of the
fund's portfolio and consulting with any other of the fund's advisers
that is a principal underwriter or affiliated person of a principal
underwriter concerning the fund's securities transactions.
These requirements provide a mechanism for fund boards to oversee
compliance with the rule. The required recordkeeping facilitates the
Commission staff's review of rule 10f-3 transactions during routine
fund inspections and, when necessary, in connection with enforcement
actions.
The staff estimates that approximately 350 funds engage in a total
of approximately 4,400 rule 10f-3 transactions each year.\2\ Rule 10f-3
requires that the purchasing fund create a written record of each
transaction that includes, among other things, from whom the securities
were purchased and the terms of the transaction. The staff estimates
\3\ that it takes an average fund approximately 30 minutes per
transaction and approximately 2,200 hours \4\ in the aggregate to
comply with this portion of the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ These estimates are based on staff extrapolations from
filings with the Commission.
\3\ Unless stated otherwise, the information collection burden
estimates contained in this Supporting Statement are based on
conversations between the staff and representatives of funds.
\4\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: (30
minutes x 4,400 = 2,200 hours).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The funds also must maintain and preserve these transactional
records in accordance with the rule's recordkeeping requirement, and
the staff estimates that it takes a fund approximately 20 minutes per
transaction and that annually, in the aggregate, funds spend
approximately 1,467 hours \5\ to comply with this portion of the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ This estimate is based on the following calculations: (20
minutes x 4,400 transactions = 88,000 minutes; 88,000 minutes / 60 =
1,467 hours).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, fund boards must, no less than quarterly, examine each
of these transactions to ensure that they comply with the fund's
policies and procedures. The information or materials upon which the
board relied to come to this determination also must be maintained and
the staff estimates that it takes a fund 1 hour per quarter and, in the
aggregate, approximately 1,400 hours \6\ annually to comply with this
rule requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: (1 hour
per quarter x 4 quarters x 350 funds = 1,400 hours).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The staff estimates that reviewing and revising as needed written
procedures for rule 10f-3 transactions takes, on average for each fund,
two hours of a compliance attorney's time per year.\7\ Thus, annually,
in the aggregate, the staff estimates that funds spend a total of
approximately 700 hours \8\ on monitoring and revising rule 10f-3
procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ These averages take into account the fact that in most
years, fund attorneys and boards spend little or no time modifying
procedures and in other years, they spend significant time doing so.
\8\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: (350
funds x 2 hours = 700 hours).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on an analysis of fund filings, the staff estimates that
approximately 600 fund portfolios enter into subadvisory agreements
each year.\9\ Based on discussions with industry representatives, the
staff estimates that it will require approximately 3 attorney hours to
draft and execute additional clauses in new subadvisory contracts in
order for funds and subadvisers to be able to rely on the exemptions in
rule 10f-3. Because these additional clauses are identical to the
clauses that a fund would need to insert in their subadvisory contracts
to rely on rules 12d3-1, 17a-10, and 17e-1, and because we believe that
funds that use one such rule generally use all of these rules, we
apportion this 3 hour time burden equally to all four rules. Therefore,
we estimate that the burden allocated to rule 10f-3 for this contract
change would be 0.75 hours.\10\ Assuming that all 600 funds that enter
into new subadvisory contracts each year make the modification to their
contract required by the rule, we estimate that the rule's contract
modification requirement will result in 450 burden hours annually.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The use of subadvisers has grown rapidly over the last
several years, with approximately 600 portfolios that use
subadvisers registering between December 2005 and December 2006.
Based on information in Commission filings, we estimate that 31
percent of funds are advised by subadvisers.
\10\ This estimate is based on the following calculation (3
hours / 4 rules = .75 hours).
\11\ These estimates are based on the following calculations:
(0.75 hours x 600 portfolios = 450 burden hours).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The staff estimates, therefore, that rule 10f-3 imposes an
information collection burden of 6,217 hours.\12\ This estimate does
not include the time spent filing transaction reports on Form N-SAR,
which is encompassed in the information collection burden estimate for
that form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: (2,200
hours + 1,467 hours + 1,400 hours + 700 hours + 450 hours = 6,217
total burden hours).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the Commission, including whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burdens
of the collections of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burdens of the collections of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments to R. Corey Booth, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O
Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA, 22312; or
send an e-mail to: PRA--Mailbox@sec.gov.
[[Page 1238]]
Dated: December 27, 2007.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-3 Filed 1-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P