Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Canada: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73321-73322 [07-6217]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 247 / Thursday, December 27, 2007 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Pursuant to section 773(a)(6)(C)(iii) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.410(c), we
deducted comparison market direct
selling expenses (i.e., credit expenses)
and added U.S. direct selling expenses
(i.e., credit expenses). In accordance
with sections 773(a)(6)(A) and (B) of the
Act, we deducted comparison market
packing costs and added U.S. packing
costs. We made an adjustment to NV to
account for differences in physical
characteristics of the merchandise, in
accordance with section 773(a)(6)(C)(ii)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.411(a). We
based this adjustment on the difference
in the variable costs of manufacturing
for the foreign like product and subject
merchandise. See 19 CFR 351.411(b).
See C&A Preliminary Analysis Memo.
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and 4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be the all–
others rate established in the LTFV
investigation. These requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Assessment Rate
Upon completion of the new shipper
review, the Department shall determine,
and CBP shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212. The
Department intends to issue assessment
instructions for C&A directly to CBP 15
days after the date of publication of the
Currency Conversion
final results of this new shipper review.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we
In accordance with sections 773A(a)
will calculate an importer–specific
of the Act, we made currency
assessment rate on the basis of the ratio
conversions based on the official
of the total amount of antidumping
exchange rates in effect on the dates of
the U.S. sales as certified by the Federal duties calculated for the examined sales
and the total entered value of the
Reserve Bank of New York. See also 19
examined sales. We will instruct CBP to
CFR 351.415.
assess antidumping duties on all
Preliminary Results of New Shipper
appropriate entries covered by this
Review
review if the importer–specific
As a result of our review, we
assessment rate calculated in the final
preliminarily determine that the
results of this review is above de
following percentage margin exists for
minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50 percent).
C&A for the period July 1, 2006, through Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we
December 31, 2006:
will instruct CBP to liquidate without
regard to antidumping duties any
Manufacturer/Exporter
Margin
entries for which the assessment rate is
zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50
C & A Products Co.,
Ltd. ............................
0.00 % percent). See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1).
The final results of this review shall
be the basis for the assessment of
Cash Deposit Requirements
antidumping duties on entries of
The following cash deposit
merchandise covered by the final results
requirements will be effective for all
of this review.
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Disclosure and Public Hearing
for consumption on or after the
The Department will disclose to
publication date of the final results of
parties the calculations performed in
the new shipper review, as provided by
connection with these preliminary
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: 1) the
results within five days of the date of
cash deposit rate for C&A (i.e., for
publication of this notice. See 19 CFR
subject merchandise both manufactured 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309,
and exported by C&A) will be that
interested parties may submit cases
established in the final results of this
briefs not later than 30 days after the
review, except if the rate is less than
date of publication of this notice.
0.50 percent, and therefore, de minimis
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised
within the meaning of 19 CFR
in the case briefs, may be filed not later
351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash
than 5 days after the deadline for filing
deposit rate will be zero; 2) for
the case briefs. Parties who submit case
previously reviewed or investigated
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
companies not participating in this
proceeding are requested to submit with
review, the cash deposit rate will
each argument: 1) a statement of the
continue to be the company–specific
issue; 2) a brief summary of the
rate published for the most recent
argument; and 3) a table of authorities.
period; 3) if the exporter is not a firm
Interested parties who wish to request
covered in these reviews or the original
a hearing or to participate if one is
less–than-fair–value (LTFV)
requested must submit a written request
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
to the Assistant Secretary for Import
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:40 Dec 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73321
Administration, Room B–099, within 30
days of the date of publication of this
notice. Requests should contain: 1) the
party’s name, address and telephone
number; 2) the number of participants;
and 3) a list of issues to be discussed.
See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Issues raised in
the hearing will be limited to those
raised in the case and rebuttal briefs.
The Department will issue the final
results of this review, including the
results of its analysis of issues raised in
any written briefs, within 90 days of
publication of these preliminary results,
unless the final results are extended.
See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.213(h).
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
This new shipper review is issued
and published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act, as well as 19 CFR 351.214(i).
Dated: December 19, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–25057 Filed 12–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–122–840]
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
Rod From Canada: Notice of Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is partially rescinding
its administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on carbon and
certain alloy steel wire rod from Canada
for the period October 1, 2006, to
September 30, 2007, with respect to
Mittal Canada Inc. (formerly Ispat
Sidbec Inc.). This rescission, in part, is
based on the timely withdrawal of the
request for review.
DATES: December 27, 2007.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
73322
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 247 / Thursday, December 27, 2007 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Cordell or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Room 7866, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0408
and (202) 482–0649, respectively.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Background
On October 29, 2002, the Department
published in the Federal Register an
antidumping duty order on carbon and
certain alloy steel wire rod (steel wire
rod) from Canada. See Notice of
Amended Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order: Carbon and
Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
Canada, 67 FR 65944 (October 29, 2002)
(Order).
On October 1, 2007, the Department
issued a notice of opportunity to request
an administrative review of this order
for the October 1, 2006 through
September 30, 2007 period of review.
See Antidumping or Countervailing
Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 72 FR 55741
(October 1, 2007). Administrative
reviews were requested for Ivaco Rolling
Mills 2004 (formerly Ivaco Rolling Mills
L.P.), Sivaco Ontario, a division of
Sivaco Wire Group 2004 L.P. (formerly
Ivaco, Inc.), and Mittal Canada Inc.
(formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.). On
November 26, 2007, the Department
initiated a review of these companies.
See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 72 FR 65938 (November 26, 2007).
Rescission in Part, of Administrative
Review
The applicable regulation, 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), states that if a party that
requested an administrative review
withdraws the request within 90 days of
the publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review, the
Secretary will rescind the review in
whole or in part. Mittal Canada Inc.
(formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.) made a
timely withdrawal of its request for an
administrative review within the 90-day
deadline. Because no other party
requested an administrative review of
that company, we are rescinding the
review with regard to Mittal Canada Inc.
(formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.).
The Department intends to issue
appropriate assessment instructions
directly to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) 15 days after the
publication of this notice. The
Department will direct CBP to assess
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Dec 26, 2007
Jkt 214001
antidumping duties for this company at
the cash deposit rate in effect on the
date of entry for entries during the
period October 1, 2006, to September
30, 2007.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
section 351.402(f) of the Department’s
regulations to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this period of
time. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and subsequent assessment of
double antidumping duties.
published on November 30, 2007, that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
light-walled rectangular pipe and tube
from the People’s Republic of China.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 27, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Damian Felton or Shane Subler, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0133 and (202)
482–0189, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
International Trade Administration
We initiated a countervailing duty
investigation on light-walled rectangular
pipe and tube (‘‘LWRP’’) from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See
Notice of Initiation of Countervailing
Duty Investigation: Light-Walled
Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the
People’s Republic of China, 72 FR 40281
(July 24, 2007). On November 30, 2007,
we published our preliminary
determination stating that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
LWRP from the PRC. See Light-walled
Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination and Alignment of Final
Countervailing Duty Determination with
Final Antidumping Duty Determination,
72 FR 67703 (November 30, 2007)
(‘‘Preliminary Determination’’). On
December 3, 2007, Zhangjiagang
Zhongyuan Pipe-making Co., Ltd.
(‘‘ZZPC’’) filed a timely allegation of a
significant ministerial error contained in
the Department’s Preliminary
Determination. After reviewing the
allegation, we have determined that the
Preliminary Determination included a
significant ministerial error. Therefore,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(e),
we have made changes, as described
below, to the Preliminary
Determination.
[C–570–915]
Scope of the Investigation
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and
Tube From the People’s Republic of
China: Notice of Amended Affirmative
Preliminary Countervailing Duty
Determination
The merchandise that is the subject of
this investigation is certain welded
carbon-quality light-walled steel pipe
and tube, of rectangular (including
square) cross section (LWR), having a
wall thickness of less than 4mm.
The term carbon-quality steel
includes both carbon steel and alloy
steel which contains only small
amounts of alloying elements.
Specifically, the term carbon-quality
includes products in which none of the
elements listed below exceeds the
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with section 351.305(a)(3) of the
Department’s regulations. Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 351.213(d)(4) of
the Department’s regulations and
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: December 17, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 07–6217 Filed 12–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The purpose of this amended
affirmative preliminary determination is
to correct a significant ministerial error
in the preliminary determination,
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 247 (Thursday, December 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73321-73322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6217]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-122-840]
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Canada: Notice of
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is partially
rescinding its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Canada for the period
October 1, 2006, to September 30, 2007, with respect to Mittal Canada
Inc. (formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.). This rescission, in part, is based
on the timely withdrawal of the request for review.
DATES: December 27, 2007.
[[Page 73322]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Cordell or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 7866, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-0408 and (202) 482-0649, respectively.
Background
On October 29, 2002, the Department published in the Federal
Register an antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel
wire rod (steel wire rod) from Canada. See Notice of Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty
Order: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Canada, 67 FR 65944
(October 29, 2002) (Order).
On October 1, 2007, the Department issued a notice of opportunity
to request an administrative review of this order for the October 1,
2006 through September 30, 2007 period of review. See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation;
Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 72 FR 55741 (October 1,
2007). Administrative reviews were requested for Ivaco Rolling Mills
2004 (formerly Ivaco Rolling Mills L.P.), Sivaco Ontario, a division of
Sivaco Wire Group 2004 L.P. (formerly Ivaco, Inc.), and Mittal Canada
Inc. (formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.). On November 26, 2007, the Department
initiated a review of these companies. See Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 72 FR 65938 (November 26, 2007).
Rescission in Part, of Administrative Review
The applicable regulation, 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), states that if a
party that requested an administrative review withdraws the request
within 90 days of the publication of the notice of initiation of the
requested review, the Secretary will rescind the review in whole or in
part. Mittal Canada Inc. (formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.) made a timely
withdrawal of its request for an administrative review within the 90-
day deadline. Because no other party requested an administrative review
of that company, we are rescinding the review with regard to Mittal
Canada Inc. (formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.).[FEDREG][VOL]*[/VOL][NO]*[/
NO][DATE]*[/DATE][NOTICES][NOTICE][PREAMB][AGENCY]*[/
AGENCY][SUBJECT]*[/SUBJECT]
The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions
directly to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days after the
publication of this notice. The Department will direct CBP to assess
antidumping duties for this company at the cash deposit rate in effect
on the date of entry for entries during the period October 1, 2006, to
September 30, 2007.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under section 351.402(f) of the Department's regulations
to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this period of
time. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the
Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with section 351.305(a)(3) of the Department's
regulations. Timely written notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with section
351.213(d)(4) of the Department's regulations and sections 751(a)(1)
and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: December 17, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 07-6217 Filed 12-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
