Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Canada: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73321-73322 [07-6217]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 247 / Thursday, December 27, 2007 / Notices mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Pursuant to section 773(a)(6)(C)(iii) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.410(c), we deducted comparison market direct selling expenses (i.e., credit expenses) and added U.S. direct selling expenses (i.e., credit expenses). In accordance with sections 773(a)(6)(A) and (B) of the Act, we deducted comparison market packing costs and added U.S. packing costs. We made an adjustment to NV to account for differences in physical characteristics of the merchandise, in accordance with section 773(a)(6)(C)(ii) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.411(a). We based this adjustment on the difference in the variable costs of manufacturing for the foreign like product and subject merchandise. See 19 CFR 351.411(b). See C&A Preliminary Analysis Memo. the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and 4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be the all– others rate established in the LTFV investigation. These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Assessment Rate Upon completion of the new shipper review, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions for C&A directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the Currency Conversion final results of this new shipper review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we In accordance with sections 773A(a) will calculate an importer–specific of the Act, we made currency assessment rate on the basis of the ratio conversions based on the official of the total amount of antidumping exchange rates in effect on the dates of the U.S. sales as certified by the Federal duties calculated for the examined sales and the total entered value of the Reserve Bank of New York. See also 19 examined sales. We will instruct CBP to CFR 351.415. assess antidumping duties on all Preliminary Results of New Shipper appropriate entries covered by this Review review if the importer–specific As a result of our review, we assessment rate calculated in the final preliminarily determine that the results of this review is above de following percentage margin exists for minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50 percent). C&A for the period July 1, 2006, through Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we December 31, 2006: will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any Manufacturer/Exporter Margin entries for which the assessment rate is zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 C & A Products Co., Ltd. ............................ 0.00 % percent). See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1). The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of Cash Deposit Requirements antidumping duties on entries of The following cash deposit merchandise covered by the final results requirements will be effective for all of this review. shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Disclosure and Public Hearing for consumption on or after the The Department will disclose to publication date of the final results of parties the calculations performed in the new shipper review, as provided by connection with these preliminary section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: 1) the results within five days of the date of cash deposit rate for C&A (i.e., for publication of this notice. See 19 CFR subject merchandise both manufactured 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309, and exported by C&A) will be that interested parties may submit cases established in the final results of this briefs not later than 30 days after the review, except if the rate is less than date of publication of this notice. 0.50 percent, and therefore, de minimis Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised within the meaning of 19 CFR in the case briefs, may be filed not later 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash than 5 days after the deadline for filing deposit rate will be zero; 2) for the case briefs. Parties who submit case previously reviewed or investigated briefs or rebuttal briefs in this companies not participating in this proceeding are requested to submit with review, the cash deposit rate will each argument: 1) a statement of the continue to be the company–specific issue; 2) a brief summary of the rate published for the most recent argument; and 3) a table of authorities. period; 3) if the exporter is not a firm Interested parties who wish to request covered in these reviews or the original a hearing or to participate if one is less–than-fair–value (LTFV) requested must submit a written request investigation, but the manufacturer is, to the Assistant Secretary for Import VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:40 Dec 26, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 73321 Administration, Room B–099, within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: 1) the party’s name, address and telephone number; 2) the number of participants; and 3) a list of issues to be discussed. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the case and rebuttal briefs. The Department will issue the final results of this review, including the results of its analysis of issues raised in any written briefs, within 90 days of publication of these preliminary results, unless the final results are extended. See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This new shipper review is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, as well as 19 CFR 351.214(i). Dated: December 19, 2007. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E7–25057 Filed 12–26–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–122–840] Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Canada: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is partially rescinding its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Canada for the period October 1, 2006, to September 30, 2007, with respect to Mittal Canada Inc. (formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.). This rescission, in part, is based on the timely withdrawal of the request for review. DATES: December 27, 2007. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM 27DEN1 73322 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 247 / Thursday, December 27, 2007 / Notices FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Cordell or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 7866, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0408 and (202) 482–0649, respectively. mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Background On October 29, 2002, the Department published in the Federal Register an antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod (steel wire rod) from Canada. See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Canada, 67 FR 65944 (October 29, 2002) (Order). On October 1, 2007, the Department issued a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of this order for the October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007 period of review. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 72 FR 55741 (October 1, 2007). Administrative reviews were requested for Ivaco Rolling Mills 2004 (formerly Ivaco Rolling Mills L.P.), Sivaco Ontario, a division of Sivaco Wire Group 2004 L.P. (formerly Ivaco, Inc.), and Mittal Canada Inc. (formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.). On November 26, 2007, the Department initiated a review of these companies. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 72 FR 65938 (November 26, 2007). Rescission in Part, of Administrative Review The applicable regulation, 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), states that if a party that requested an administrative review withdraws the request within 90 days of the publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review, the Secretary will rescind the review in whole or in part. Mittal Canada Inc. (formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.) made a timely withdrawal of its request for an administrative review within the 90-day deadline. Because no other party requested an administrative review of that company, we are rescinding the review with regard to Mittal Canada Inc. (formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.). The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days after the publication of this notice. The Department will direct CBP to assess VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:00 Dec 26, 2007 Jkt 214001 antidumping duties for this company at the cash deposit rate in effect on the date of entry for entries during the period October 1, 2006, to September 30, 2007. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under section 351.402(f) of the Department’s regulations to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this period of time. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. published on November 30, 2007, that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from the People’s Republic of China. EFFECTIVE DATE: December 27, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Damian Felton or Shane Subler, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0133 and (202) 482–0189, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background International Trade Administration We initiated a countervailing duty investigation on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube (‘‘LWRP’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See Notice of Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation: Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the People’s Republic of China, 72 FR 40281 (July 24, 2007). On November 30, 2007, we published our preliminary determination stating that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of LWRP from the PRC. See Light-walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Final Antidumping Duty Determination, 72 FR 67703 (November 30, 2007) (‘‘Preliminary Determination’’). On December 3, 2007, Zhangjiagang Zhongyuan Pipe-making Co., Ltd. (‘‘ZZPC’’) filed a timely allegation of a significant ministerial error contained in the Department’s Preliminary Determination. After reviewing the allegation, we have determined that the Preliminary Determination included a significant ministerial error. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(e), we have made changes, as described below, to the Preliminary Determination. [C–570–915] Scope of the Investigation Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Amended Affirmative Preliminary Countervailing Duty Determination The merchandise that is the subject of this investigation is certain welded carbon-quality light-walled steel pipe and tube, of rectangular (including square) cross section (LWR), having a wall thickness of less than 4mm. The term carbon-quality steel includes both carbon steel and alloy steel which contains only small amounts of alloying elements. Specifically, the term carbon-quality includes products in which none of the elements listed below exceeds the Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with section 351.305(a)(3) of the Department’s regulations. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 351.213(d)(4) of the Department’s regulations and sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. Dated: December 17, 2007. Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 07–6217 Filed 12–26–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The purpose of this amended affirmative preliminary determination is to correct a significant ministerial error in the preliminary determination, AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM 27DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 247 (Thursday, December 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73321-73322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-122-840]


Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Canada: Notice of 
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is partially 
rescinding its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 
carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Canada for the period 
October 1, 2006, to September 30, 2007, with respect to Mittal Canada 
Inc. (formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.). This rescission, in part, is based 
on the timely withdrawal of the request for review.

DATES: December 27, 2007.

[[Page 73322]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Cordell or Robert James, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 7866, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-0408 and (202) 482-0649, respectively.

Background

    On October 29, 2002, the Department published in the Federal 
Register an antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel 
wire rod (steel wire rod) from Canada. See Notice of Amended Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty 
Order: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Canada, 67 FR 65944 
(October 29, 2002) (Order).
    On October 1, 2007, the Department issued a notice of opportunity 
to request an administrative review of this order for the October 1, 
2006 through September 30, 2007 period of review. See Antidumping or 
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; 
Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 72 FR 55741 (October 1, 
2007). Administrative reviews were requested for Ivaco Rolling Mills 
2004 (formerly Ivaco Rolling Mills L.P.), Sivaco Ontario, a division of 
Sivaco Wire Group 2004 L.P. (formerly Ivaco, Inc.), and Mittal Canada 
Inc. (formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.). On November 26, 2007, the Department 
initiated a review of these companies. See Initiation of Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for 
Revocation in Part, 72 FR 65938 (November 26, 2007).

Rescission in Part, of Administrative Review

    The applicable regulation, 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), states that if a 
party that requested an administrative review withdraws the request 
within 90 days of the publication of the notice of initiation of the 
requested review, the Secretary will rescind the review in whole or in 
part. Mittal Canada Inc. (formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.) made a timely 
withdrawal of its request for an administrative review within the 90-
day deadline. Because no other party requested an administrative review 
of that company, we are rescinding the review with regard to Mittal 
Canada Inc. (formerly Ispat Sidbec Inc.).[FEDREG][VOL]*[/VOL][NO]*[/
NO][DATE]*[/DATE][NOTICES][NOTICE][PREAMB][AGENCY]*[/
AGENCY][SUBJECT]*[/SUBJECT]
    The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions 
directly to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days after the 
publication of this notice. The Department will direct CBP to assess 
antidumping duties for this company at the cash deposit rate in effect 
on the date of entry for entries during the period October 1, 2006, to 
September 30, 2007.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under section 351.402(f) of the Department's regulations 
to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties 
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this period of 
time. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the 
Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties 
occurred and subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with section 351.305(a)(3) of the Department's 
regulations. Timely written notification of the return or destruction 
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a sanctionable violation.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 
351.213(d)(4) of the Department's regulations and sections 751(a)(1) 
and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

    Dated: December 17, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 07-6217 Filed 12-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M