Demands for Testimony or Records in Legal Proceedings, 72976-72978 [E7-24966]
Download as PDF
72976
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2007 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1910
Hazardous substances, Health,
Occupational safety and health, Toxic
substances.
Authority and Signature
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210, directed the
preparation of this notice. Accordingly,
the Agency issues the proposed
amendment under the following
authorities: Sections 4, 6(b), 8(c), and
8(g) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 653, 655,
657); Section 3704 of the Contract Work
Hours and Safety Standards Act (40
U.S.C. 3701 et seq.); Section 41 of the
Longshore and Harbor Worker’s
Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 941);
Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 5–2007
(72 FR 31159); and 29 CFR part 1911.
Signed at Washington, DC on December 17,
2007.
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
IV. Proposed Amendment to the
Standard
For the reasons stated above in the
preamble, the Agency proposes to
amend 29 CFR part 1910 as follows:
PART 1910—[AMENDED]
Subpart I—[AMENDED]
1. Revise the authority citation for
subpart I of part 1910 to read as follows:
Authority: Sections 4, 6, and 8 of the
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970
(29 U.S.C. 653, 655, and 657); Section 3704
of the Contract Work Hours and Safety
Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3701 et seq.);
Section 41, Longshore and Harbor Worker’s
Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 941); and
Secretary of Labor’s Order Nos. 8–76 (41 FR
25059), 9–83 (48 FR 35736), 1–90 (55 FR
9033), 6–96 (62 FR 111), 3–2000 (65 FR
50017), or 5–2007 (72 FR 31159), as
applicable.
Sections 29 CFR 1910.132, 1910.134, and
1910.138 also issued under 29 CFR part 1911.
Sections 29 CFR 1910.133, 1910.135, and
1910.136 also issued under 29 CFR part 1911
and 5 U.S.C. 553.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
2. Amend section B.4(b)(8) of
Appendix A to § 1910.134 to read as
follows:
§ 1910.134
Respiratory protection.
*
*
*
*
*
Appendix A to § 1910.134: Fit Testing
Procedures (Mandatory)
*
*
*
*
*
B. * * *
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Dec 21, 2007
Jkt 214001
4. * * *
(b) * * *
(8) After generating the aerosol, the
employer shall:
(i) Instruct the test subject to perform the
exercises specified by section I.A.14 of this
appendix; and
(ii) Ensure that the test subject performs
each of these test exercises for one minute;
however, if the test subject is able to detect
the taste of the Bitrex sensitivity screening
solution within the first 10 squeezes of the
nebulizer bulb (‘‘Level 1 sensitivity’’), the
employer may elect to have the test subject
perform each of the test exercises for a
minimum of 15 seconds.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–24792 Filed 12–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Part 8
[Docket ID ED–2007–OS–0138]
Demands for Testimony or Records in
Legal Proceedings
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Secretary proposes to
amend the Department’s regulations
regarding the production of information
pursuant to demands in judicial or
administrative proceedings. The
changes are intended to promote
consistency in the Department’s
assertion of privileges and objections,
and thereby prevent harm that may
result from inappropriate disclosure of
confidential information or
inappropriate allocation of agency
resources. These changes would apply
only where employees are subpoenaed
in litigation to which the agency is not
a party. Former Department employees
would be expressly required to seek the
Secretary’s approval prior to responding
to subpoenas that seek non-public
materials and information acquired
during their employment at the
Department.
We must receive your comments
on or before February 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or via postal mail, commercial delivery,
or hand delivery. We will not accept
comments by fax or by e-mail. Please
submit your comments only one time, in
order to ensure that we do not receive
duplicate copies. In addition, please
include the Docket ID at the top of your
comments.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov Under
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
‘‘Search Documents’’ go to ‘‘Optional
Step 2’’ and select ‘‘Department of
Education’’ from the agency drop-down
menu; then click ‘‘Submit.’’ In the
Docket ID column, select ED–2007–OS–
0138 to add or view public comments
and to view supporting and related
materials available electronically.
Information on using
www.regulations.gov, including
instructions for submitting comments,
accessing documents, and viewing the
docket after the close of the comment
period, is available through the site’s
‘‘User Tips’’ link.
• Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery,
or Hand Delivery. If you mail or deliver
your comments about these proposed
regulations, address them to Christine
M. Rose, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Room
6C122, Washington, DC 20202–2110.
Privacy Note: The Department’s policy for
comments received from members of the
public (including those comments submitted
by mail, commercial delivery, or hand
delivery) is to make these submissions
available for public viewing in their entirety
on the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
commenters should be careful to include in
their comments only information that they
wish to make publicly available on the
Internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine M. Rose, Telephone: (202)
401–6700.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment
We invite you to submit comments
regarding these proposed regulations.
To ensure that your comments have
maximum effect in developing the final
regulations, we urge you to identify
clearly the specific section or sections of
the proposed regulations that each of
your comments addresses and to arrange
your comments in the same order as the
proposed regulations.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866
and its overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
these proposed regulations. Please let us
know of any further opportunities we
should take to reduce potential costs or
E:\FR\FM\26DEP1.SGM
26DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2007 / Proposed Rules
demands in judicial or administrative
proceedings. The regulations prescribe
instructions and procedures to be
followed by current Department
employees with respect to the
production and disclosure of material or
information acquired as a result of
performance of the person’s official
duties or because of the person’s official
status in response to judicially
enforceable subpoenas or demands in
judicial or administrative proceedings,
except demands from the Congress or in
Federal grand jury proceedings.
Assistance to Individuals With
The current regulations also specify
Disabilities in Reviewing the
what requirements requestors must
Rulemaking Record
follow when submitting a demand for
testimony or records.
On request, we will supply an
Proposed Regulations: The proposed
appropriate aid, such as a reader or
regulations would modify the definition
print magnifier, to an individual with a
of employee to include both current and
disability who needs assistance to
former employees. With this change, the
review the comments or other
regulations would expressly require
documents in the public rulemaking
record for these proposed regulations. If former employees to follow the uniform
prescribed instructions and procedures
you want to schedule an appointment
that current employees must follow
for this type of aid, please contact the
concerning disclosure or production of
person listed under FOR FURTHER
agency materials or information
INFORMATION CONTACT.
acquired during their employment with
Background
the Department in response to a
judicially enforceable subpoena or
The Secretary proposes to amend
§§ 8.1 through 8.3 of title 34 of the Code demand. The proposed regulations also
provide that a demand for testimony or
of Federal Regulations (CFR). The
records expressly include a statement of
regulations in 34 CFR part 8 pertain to
why the release of information would
production of information pursuant to
not be contrary to an interest of the
demands in judicial or administrative
Department or the United States.
proceedings. We are proposing these
Reason: The Department is proposing
amendments to require that former
to amend the definition of employee to
Department employees follow the same
include both current and former
set of prescribed instructions and
employees in order to eliminate any
procedures that are required of current
confusion regarding whether the
employees, with respect to the
production and disclosure of material or regulations concerning disclosure or
production of agency materials or
information acquired during the
information in judicial or administrative
performance of the former employee’s
proceedings in response to a judicially
official duties or because of the former
enforceable subpoena or demand apply
employee’s official status when
to former employees.
responding to judicially enforceable
These proposed regulations are
subpoenas or demands in judicial or
intended to provide an orderly means
administrative proceedings, except
by which both current and former
demands from the Congress or in
employees respond to demands for
Federal grand jury proceedings.
material and information covered by the
Significant Proposed Regulations
regulations, and to protect the interests
of the United States, including the
We do not address proposed
safeguarding of privileged or otherwise
regulatory provisions that are technical
sensitive information. The increase in
or otherwise minor in effect.
the number of subpoenas and other
Sections 8.1 Through 8.3—Production of demands to current and former
Information Pursuant to Demands in
employees in judicial or administrative
Judicial or Administrative Proceedings
proceedings, particularly in cases in
Statute: 5 U.S.C. 301 allows an agency which neither the Department nor the
head to prescribe regulations concerning United States is a party, necessitates
detailed and uniform instructions to be
the conduct of its employees, the
followed by both current and former
performance of its business and the
employees. Additionally, the express
custody and use of agency records.
inclusion of former employees aligns
Current Regulations: The current
the Department’s regulations to be more
regulations in 34 CFR part 8 pertain to
consistent with those of other agencies,
production of information pursuant to
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
increase potential benefits while
preserving the effective and efficient
administration of the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about these proposed regulations by
accessing www.regulations.gov. You
may also inspect the comments, in
person, in Room 6C122, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, between
the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Eastern time, Monday through Friday of
each week except Federal holidays.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Dec 21, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72977
including the U.S. Department of
Justice.
We are proposing to amend the
requirements for submitting a demand
for testimony or records in order to be
consistent with current regulations
which identify the items the Secretary
must consider when determining
whether to grant the request. The
Department has an interest in protecting
nonpublic materials and information,
which extends to subpoenas that seek
information that is privileged or
confidential, or both, acquired during
employment at the Department. The
changes are intended to promote
consistency in the agency’s assertion of
privileges and objections, and thereby
prevent harm that may result from
inappropriate disclosure of confidential
information.
These proposed regulations are
consistent with the decision in the
landmark case of United States ex rel.
Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951), in
which the Supreme Court upheld the
ability of an agency head to issue
regulations for the preservation of
agency records, and determined that an
agency employee, acting pursuant to
such instructions, could not be held in
contempt of court for declining to
produce records in response to a
subpoena duces tecum. We do not
intend the proposed regulations to
preclude disclosures or productions in
compliance with Court orders except
where disclosure would be
inappropriate even if required by a
court, e.g., where disclosure would be
legally prohibited or would be contrary
to a recognized privilege.
Executive Order 12866
1. Potential Costs and Benefits
Under Executive Order 12866, we
have assessed the potential costs and
benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
the proposed regulations are those
resulting from statutory requirements
and those we have determined to be
necessary for administering this
program effectively and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this regulatory action,
we have determined that the benefits
would justify the costs.
We have also determined that this
regulatory action would not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
Summary of Potential Costs and
Benefits
The Secretary has assessed the
potential costs and benefits of this
E:\FR\FM\26DEP1.SGM
26DEP1
72978
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2007 / Proposed Rules
regulatory action and has determined
that the benefits would justify the costs.
These changes are intended to promote
consistency in the Department’s
assertion of privileges and objections,
and thereby prevent harm that may
result from inappropriate disclosure of
confidential information or
inappropriate allocation of agency
resources. The anticipated costs of this
regulatory action would be minimal.
2. Clarity of the Regulations
Executive Order 12866 and the
Presidential memorandum on ‘‘Plain
Language in Government Writing’’
require each agency to write regulations
that are easy to understand.
The Secretary invites comments on
how to make these proposed regulations
easier to understand, including answers
to questions such as the following:
• Are the requirements in the
proposed regulations clearly stated?
• Do the proposed regulations contain
technical terms or other wording that
interferes with their clarity?
• Does the format of the proposed
regulations (grouping and order of
sections, use of headings, paragraphing,
etc.) aid or reduce their clarity?
• Would the proposed regulations be
easier to understand if we divided them
into more (but shorter) sections? (A
‘‘section’’ is preceded by the symbol
‘‘§ ’’ and a numbered heading; for
example, § 8.1 What is the scope and
application of this part?.)
• Could the description of the
proposed regulations in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this preamble be more helpful in
making the proposed regulations easier
to understand? If so, how?
• What else could we do to make the
proposed regulations easier to
understand?
To send any comments that concern
how the Department could make these
proposed regulations easier to
understand, see the instructions in the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Secretary certifies that these
proposed regulations would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
These proposed regulations do not
contain any information collection
requirements.
Intergovernmental Review
These proposed regulations are not
subject to Executive Order 12372 and
the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Dec 21, 2007
Jkt 214001
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well
as all other Department of Education
documents published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/
news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number does not apply.)
List of Subjects in 34 CFR Part 8
Courts, Government employees,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
adding, in their place, the words ‘‘, why
the information sought is unavailable by
any other means, and the reason why
the release of the information would not
be contrary to an interest of the
Department or the United States’’.
C. In paragraph (b), removing the
words ‘‘or former employee’’ each time
they appear.
D. In paragraph (b), removing the
words ‘‘room 4083, FOB–6,’’ and
adding, in their place, the words ‘‘room
6E300, Lyndon Baines Johnson
Building,’’.
E. In paragraph (c), removing the
words ‘‘or former employee’’.
F. In paragraph (c), removing the
words ‘‘Records Management Branch
Chief, Office of Information Resources
Management, U.S. Department of
Education, 7th and D Streets, SW.,
ROB–3’’ and adding, in their place, the
words ‘‘Records Officer, Information
Policy and Standards Team, Regulatory
Information Management Services,
Office of Management, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue,
SW., room 9161, PCP’’.
[FR Doc. E7–24966 Filed 12–21–07; 8:45 am]
Dated: December 18, 2007.
Margaret Spellings,
Secretary of Education.
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Secretary of Education
proposes to amend part 8 of title 34 of
the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
PART 8—DEMANDS FOR TESTIMONY
OR RECORDS IN LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
Approval and Promulgation of State
Plans for Designated Facilities and
Pollutants; Kansas; Clean Air Mercury
Rule
1. The authority citation for part 8
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 5 U.S.C. 552; 20
U.S.C. 3474, unless otherwise noted.
§ 8.1
[Amended]
2. The introductory text of § 8.1(a) is
amended by removing the words ‘‘if the
Department or any departmental
employee’’ and adding, in their place,
the words ‘‘when the Department or any
employee of the Department’’.
§ 8.2
[Amended]
3. The definition of ‘‘Employee’’ in
§ 8.2 is amended by adding the words
‘‘or former’’ between the words
‘‘current’’ and ‘‘employee’’.
§ 8.3
[Amended]
4. Section 8.3 is amended by:
A. In the introductory text of
paragraph (a), removing the words ‘‘or
former employee,’’.
B. In paragraph (a)(2), removing the
words ‘‘and why the information sought
is unavailable by any other means’’ and
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R07–OAR–2007–1143; FRL–8510–7]
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
the State Plan submitted by Kansas on
June 19, 2007. The plan addresses the
requirements of EPA’s Clean Air
Mercury Rule (CAMR), promulgated on
May 18, 2005, and subsequently revised
on June 9, 2006. EPA is proposing to
determine that the submitted State Plan
fully meets the CAMR requirements for
Kansas.
CAMR requires States to regulate
emissions of mercury (Hg) from large
coal-fired electric generating units
(EGUs). CAMR establishes State budgets
for annual EGU Hg emissions and
requires States to submit State Plans to
ensure that annual EGU Hg emissions
will not exceed the applicable State
budget. States have the flexibility to
choose which control measures to adopt
to achieve the budgets, including
E:\FR\FM\26DEP1.SGM
26DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 26, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72976-72978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24966]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Part 8
[Docket ID ED-2007-OS-0138]
Demands for Testimony or Records in Legal Proceedings
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Secretary proposes to amend the Department's regulations
regarding the production of information pursuant to demands in judicial
or administrative proceedings. The changes are intended to promote
consistency in the Department's assertion of privileges and objections,
and thereby prevent harm that may result from inappropriate disclosure
of confidential information or inappropriate allocation of agency
resources. These changes would apply only where employees are
subpoenaed in litigation to which the agency is not a party. Former
Department employees would be expressly required to seek the
Secretary's approval prior to responding to subpoenas that seek non-
public materials and information acquired during their employment at
the Department.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before February 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or via postal mail, commercial delivery, or hand delivery. We will not
accept comments by fax or by e-mail. Please submit your comments only
one time, in order to ensure that we do not receive duplicate copies.
In addition, please include the Docket ID at the top of your comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov Under ``Search Documents'' go to ``Optional Step
2'' and select ``Department of Education'' from the agency drop-down
menu; then click ``Submit.'' In the Docket ID column, select ED-2007-
OS-0138 to add or view public comments and to view supporting and
related materials available electronically. Information on using
www.regulations.gov, including instructions for submitting comments,
accessing documents, and viewing the docket after the close of the
comment period, is available through the site's ``User Tips'' link.
Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery, or Hand Delivery. If you
mail or deliver your comments about these proposed regulations, address
them to Christine M. Rose, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Room 6C122, Washington, DC 20202-2110.
Privacy Note: The Department's policy for comments received from
members of the public (including those comments submitted by mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery) is to make these submissions
available for public viewing in their entirety on the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
commenters should be careful to include in their comments only
information that they wish to make publicly available on the
Internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine M. Rose, Telephone: (202)
401-6700.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment
We invite you to submit comments regarding these proposed
regulations. To ensure that your comments have maximum effect in
developing the final regulations, we urge you to identify clearly the
specific section or sections of the proposed regulations that each of
your comments addresses and to arrange your comments in the same order
as the proposed regulations.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from these proposed
regulations. Please let us know of any further opportunities we should
take to reduce potential costs or
[[Page 72977]]
increase potential benefits while preserving the effective and
efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about these proposed regulations by accessing
www.regulations.gov. You may also inspect the comments, in person, in
Room 6C122, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, between the hours
of 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday of each
week except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the Rulemaking
Record
On request, we will supply an appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a disability who needs
assistance to review the comments or other documents in the public
rulemaking record for these proposed regulations. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of aid, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Background
The Secretary proposes to amend Sec. Sec. 8.1 through 8.3 of title
34 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The regulations in 34 CFR
part 8 pertain to production of information pursuant to demands in
judicial or administrative proceedings. We are proposing these
amendments to require that former Department employees follow the same
set of prescribed instructions and procedures that are required of
current employees, with respect to the production and disclosure of
material or information acquired during the performance of the former
employee's official duties or because of the former employee's official
status when responding to judicially enforceable subpoenas or demands
in judicial or administrative proceedings, except demands from the
Congress or in Federal grand jury proceedings.
Significant Proposed Regulations
We do not address proposed regulatory provisions that are technical
or otherwise minor in effect.
Sections 8.1 Through 8.3--Production of Information Pursuant to Demands
in Judicial or Administrative Proceedings
Statute: 5 U.S.C. 301 allows an agency head to prescribe
regulations concerning the conduct of its employees, the performance of
its business and the custody and use of agency records.
Current Regulations: The current regulations in 34 CFR part 8
pertain to production of information pursuant to demands in judicial or
administrative proceedings. The regulations prescribe instructions and
procedures to be followed by current Department employees with respect
to the production and disclosure of material or information acquired as
a result of performance of the person's official duties or because of
the person's official status in response to judicially enforceable
subpoenas or demands in judicial or administrative proceedings, except
demands from the Congress or in Federal grand jury proceedings.
The current regulations also specify what requirements requestors
must follow when submitting a demand for testimony or records.
Proposed Regulations: The proposed regulations would modify the
definition of employee to include both current and former employees.
With this change, the regulations would expressly require former
employees to follow the uniform prescribed instructions and procedures
that current employees must follow concerning disclosure or production
of agency materials or information acquired during their employment
with the Department in response to a judicially enforceable subpoena or
demand. The proposed regulations also provide that a demand for
testimony or records expressly include a statement of why the release
of information would not be contrary to an interest of the Department
or the United States.
Reason: The Department is proposing to amend the definition of
employee to include both current and former employees in order to
eliminate any confusion regarding whether the regulations concerning
disclosure or production of agency materials or information in judicial
or administrative proceedings in response to a judicially enforceable
subpoena or demand apply to former employees.
These proposed regulations are intended to provide an orderly means
by which both current and former employees respond to demands for
material and information covered by the regulations, and to protect the
interests of the United States, including the safeguarding of
privileged or otherwise sensitive information. The increase in the
number of subpoenas and other demands to current and former employees
in judicial or administrative proceedings, particularly in cases in
which neither the Department nor the United States is a party,
necessitates detailed and uniform instructions to be followed by both
current and former employees. Additionally, the express inclusion of
former employees aligns the Department's regulations to be more
consistent with those of other agencies, including the U.S. Department
of Justice.
We are proposing to amend the requirements for submitting a demand
for testimony or records in order to be consistent with current
regulations which identify the items the Secretary must consider when
determining whether to grant the request. The Department has an
interest in protecting nonpublic materials and information, which
extends to subpoenas that seek information that is privileged or
confidential, or both, acquired during employment at the Department.
The changes are intended to promote consistency in the agency's
assertion of privileges and objections, and thereby prevent harm that
may result from inappropriate disclosure of confidential information.
These proposed regulations are consistent with the decision in the
landmark case of United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462
(1951), in which the Supreme Court upheld the ability of an agency head
to issue regulations for the preservation of agency records, and
determined that an agency employee, acting pursuant to such
instructions, could not be held in contempt of court for declining to
produce records in response to a subpoena duces tecum. We do not intend
the proposed regulations to preclude disclosures or productions in
compliance with Court orders except where disclosure would be
inappropriate even if required by a court, e.g., where disclosure would
be legally prohibited or would be contrary to a recognized privilege.
Executive Order 12866
1. Potential Costs and Benefits
Under Executive Order 12866, we have assessed the potential costs
and benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with the proposed regulations are
those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined to be necessary for administering this program effectively
and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this regulatory action, we have determined that the
benefits would justify the costs.
We have also determined that this regulatory action would not
unduly interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the
exercise of their governmental functions.
Summary of Potential Costs and Benefits
The Secretary has assessed the potential costs and benefits of this
[[Page 72978]]
regulatory action and has determined that the benefits would justify
the costs. These changes are intended to promote consistency in the
Department's assertion of privileges and objections, and thereby
prevent harm that may result from inappropriate disclosure of
confidential information or inappropriate allocation of agency
resources. The anticipated costs of this regulatory action would be
minimal.
2. Clarity of the Regulations
Executive Order 12866 and the Presidential memorandum on ``Plain
Language in Government Writing'' require each agency to write
regulations that are easy to understand.
The Secretary invites comments on how to make these proposed
regulations easier to understand, including answers to questions such
as the following:
Are the requirements in the proposed regulations clearly
stated?
Do the proposed regulations contain technical terms or
other wording that interferes with their clarity?
Does the format of the proposed regulations (grouping and
order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce
their clarity?
Would the proposed regulations be easier to understand if
we divided them into more (but shorter) sections? (A ``section'' is
preceded by the symbol ``Sec. '' and a numbered heading; for example,
Sec. 8.1 What is the scope and application of this part?.)
Could the description of the proposed regulations in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this preamble be more helpful in
making the proposed regulations easier to understand? If so, how?
What else could we do to make the proposed regulations
easier to understand?
To send any comments that concern how the Department could make
these proposed regulations easier to understand, see the instructions
in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Secretary certifies that these proposed regulations would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
These proposed regulations do not contain any information
collection requirements.
Intergovernmental Review
These proposed regulations are not subject to Executive Order 12372
and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:
https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number does not apply.)
List of Subjects in 34 CFR Part 8
Courts, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 18, 2007.
Margaret Spellings,
Secretary of Education.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Secretary of
Education proposes to amend part 8 of title 34 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 8--DEMANDS FOR TESTIMONY OR RECORDS IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
1. The authority citation for part 8 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 5 U.S.C. 552; 20 U.S.C. 3474, unless
otherwise noted.
Sec. 8.1 [Amended]
2. The introductory text of Sec. 8.1(a) is amended by removing the
words ``if the Department or any departmental employee'' and adding, in
their place, the words ``when the Department or any employee of the
Department''.
Sec. 8.2 [Amended]
3. The definition of ``Employee'' in Sec. 8.2 is amended by adding
the words ``or former'' between the words ``current'' and ``employee''.
Sec. 8.3 [Amended]
4. Section 8.3 is amended by:
A. In the introductory text of paragraph (a), removing the words
``or former employee,''.
B. In paragraph (a)(2), removing the words ``and why the
information sought is unavailable by any other means'' and adding, in
their place, the words ``, why the information sought is unavailable by
any other means, and the reason why the release of the information
would not be contrary to an interest of the Department or the United
States''.
C. In paragraph (b), removing the words ``or former employee'' each
time they appear.
D. In paragraph (b), removing the words ``room 4083, FOB-6,'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``room 6E300, Lyndon Baines Johnson
Building,''.
E. In paragraph (c), removing the words ``or former employee''.
F. In paragraph (c), removing the words ``Records Management Branch
Chief, Office of Information Resources Management, U.S. Department of
Education, 7th and D Streets, SW., ROB-3'' and adding, in their place,
the words ``Records Officer, Information Policy and Standards Team,
Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 9161, PCP''.
[FR Doc. E7-24966 Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P