Graco Children's Products, Inc.; Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 72440-72441 [E7-24702]
Download as PDF
72440
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2007 / Notices
Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low Income
Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and
Enhancement of Cultural Resources;
E.O. 13007 Indian Sacred Sites; E.O.
13287 Preserve America; E.O. 13175
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments; E.O. 11514
Protection and Enhancement of
Environmental Quality; E.O. 13112
Invasive Species. (Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance Program Number
20.205, Highway Planning and
Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and
activities apply to this program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Issued on: December 11, 2007.
Nancy Bobb,
Director, State Programs, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. E7–24700 Filed 12–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2007–0030; Notice 2]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Graco Children’s Products, Inc.; Grant
of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Graco Children’s Products, Inc.
(Graco) has determined that certain
child restraint systems that it recently
manufactured do not comply with
labeling requirements pertaining to
stating the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration’s (NHTSA)
Vehicle Safety Hotline (Hotline) number
and Graco’s Web site registration
address in paragraph S5.5.2(m) of 49
CFR 571.213, Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 213, Child
Restraint Systems. On October 26, 2007,
Graco filed an appropriate report
pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports identifying several million child
restraint systems manufactured between
June 21, 2006 and October 26, 2007 that
do not comply with the paragraph of
FMVSS No. 213 cited above. On
November 30, 2007, Graco filed an
amended report pursuant to 49 CFR Part
573 that corrected the time frame for the
noncompliant child restraints identified
in the October 26, 2007 report. Graco
now has determined that all child
restraint systems that it manufactured
between November 28, 2005 and
October 29, 2007, and certain child
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:08 Dec 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
restraint systems that it manufactured
between September 1, 2006 and October
29, 2007, do not comply with the
paragraph of FMVSS No. 213 cited
above. Affected are over eight million
child restraint systems.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) and the rule implementing
those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556,
Graco has petitioned for an exemption
from the notification and remedy
requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301
on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of the petition was
published, with a 10-day public
comment period, on November 8, 2007
in the Federal Register (72 FR 63231).
Although the text of that notice clearly
indicated that only 10 days would be
permitted for comments, the notice as
published showed a comment closing
date of December 10, 2007. On
November 16, 2007, a correction notice
(72 FR 64708) was published showing
the correct comment closing date, which
was November 19, 2007. No comments
were received. To view the petition and
all supporting documents log onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at: https://
www.regulations.gov/. Then pull down
the ‘‘Search for Dockets’’ menu tab and
follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2007–
0030.’’
For further information on this
decision, contact Mr. Zachary R. Fraser,
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA), telephone
(202) 366–5754, facsimile (202) 366–
7002.
Paragraph S5.5.2(m) of 49 CFR
571.213 requires that a child restraint
system be permanently labeled with:
(m) One of the following statements,
inserting an address and a U.S. telephone
number. If a manufacturer opts to provide a
Web site on the registration card as permitted
in Figure 9a of this section, the manufacturer
must include the statement in part (ii):
(i) ‘‘Child restraints could be recalled for
safety reasons. You must register this
restraint to be reached in a recall. Send your
name, address, e-mail address if available
(preceding four words are optional) and the
restraint’s model number and manufacturing
date to (insert address) or call (insert a U.S.
telephone number). For recall information,
call the U.S. Government’s Vehicle Safety
Hotline at 1–888–327–4236 (TTY: 1–800–
424–9153), or go to https://www.NHTSA.gov.’’
(ii) ‘‘Child restraints could be recalled for
safety reasons. You must register this
restraint to be reached in a recall. Send your
name, address, e-mail address if available
[preceding four words are optional], and the
restraint’s model number and manufacturing
date to (insert address) or call (insert a U.S.
telephone number) or register online at
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(insert Web site for electronic registration
form). For recall information, call the U.S.
Government’s Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1–
888–327–4236 (TTY: 1–800–424–9153), or go
to https://www.NHTSA.gov.’’
There are comparable requirements
beyond these labeling requirements. See
S5.6.1.7 of 49 CFR 571.213 concerning
printed instructions.
Graco explained that all subject child
restraint systems failed to comply with
the above requirements because labels
attached to them did not include
Graco’s Web site address for electronic
registration, which is required when the
manufacturer chooses to provide a Web
site on the registration card. In addition,
some models of these restraint systems
also had labels that included an
incorrect NHTSA Hotline telephone
number. Graco stated that it has
corrected the problem that caused these
errors so that they will not be repeated
in future production.
Graco stated that although the Hotline
number printed on the labels is
incorrect (i.e., the labels show a NHTSA
Hotline telephone number that the
agency once used but had relinquished
its rights to), Graco has procured the
former Hotline number and is prepared
to have all calls to that outdated number
automatically routed to the correct
number (i.e., the current NHTSA
Hotline number) for a period of 7 years.
Graco additionally stated that
although its electronic registration Web
site address is not on the restraint
systems, its toll-free telephone number
appears in at least two places on all the
restraint systems. Also, full contact
information, including the Graco’s
company Web site address, appears in
the owner’s manual of every child
restraint system manufactured by Graco.
Graco stated that neither the incorrect
NHTSA Hotline number nor the absence
of Graco’s Web site address have any
effect on the crashworthiness of the
restraint systems. Therefore, Graco
stated that these noncompliances are
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
In addition, Graco proposed two
measures as ‘‘an interim solution to
bring infant and child seats produced
with the incorrect label into substantial
compliance.’’ First, Graco reiterated its
proposal to have calls to the incorrect
NHTSA Hotline number automatically
rerouted to the correct number, which
has been made possible by Graco’s
obtaining the rights to the old number.
Graco also proposed to send a broadcast
e-mail to certain consumers about the
importance of registration of their child
restraint systems. The e-mail would
include a direct link to Graco’s online
registration Web site and be sent to
approximately 570,000 consumers who
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2007 / Notices
have either created baby registries
through Graco, requested Graco’s
newsletter, or whose names have been
acquired from prenatal lists. Graco
believes that providing the direct Graco
online registration link will allow those
consumers to register their Graco-brand
seats once they have received the email.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
NHTSA Decision
NHTSA regulations specify that child
seat manufacturers must provide the
telephone number for the Vehicle Safety
Hotline so that consumers concerned
about safety recalls or potential safetyrelated defects could contact the agency.
That telephone number has been
changed. A rule published on June 21,
2005, in the Federal Register (70 FR
35556) revised the relevant section of
the regulations to state the new
telephone number. The effective date for
the new telephone number was June 21,
2006; however, NHTSA issued an
amendment on June 21, 2006 (71 FR
35558) that changed the effective date of
the new telephone number to September
1, 2006.
Although the Hotline number printed
on the labels is not the correct number,
Graco proposed to redirect calls made to
the incorrect Hotline number to the
current Hotline number for a period of
7 years. Since filing its petition, Graco
has in fact redirected those calls so that
anyone who calls the incorrect number
is automatically connected to NHTSA’s
Hotline. NHTSA has confirmed that this
change has been activated. Also,
NHTSA has initiated appropriate
measures to reacquire the incorrect
Hotline number from Graco. Once
NHTSA has re-acquired the rights to the
old number, calls to that number will
continue to be routed directly to the
new Hotline. NHTSA therefore agrees
with Graco that there is no adverse
safety consequence from this aspect of
the noncompliance because consumers
who call the incorrect Hotline number
will automatically be redirected to the
current Hotline number.
Although the Graco models at issue
do not have labels containing Graco’s
electronic registration Web site address,
that address is shown on the registration
cards that come with each new child
restraint system. Those who purchase
the seat are, therefore, immediately
presented with the online registration
option and the necessary Web site
address where they are most likely to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:08 Dec 19, 2007
Jkt 214001
look for it, i.e., on the product
registration card. The additional
requirement that the Web site address
also be on the seat label provides
helpful information to owners who have
not already registered by using the
registration card or the online option,
and may be particularly helpful for
subsequent owners who have not
received the registration card. However,
even without the Web site information,
the noncompliant label provides the
important information that registration
is essential to being notified of a recall,
explains what information needs to be
submitted for registration, and provides
Graco’s mailing address and telephone
number for that purpose. Therefore, any
owner who reads the label will be
informed of the importance of
registration and provided with two
methods for accomplishing registration.
Also, Graco’s company Web site address
appears in every owner’s manual, so a
person intent on registering the seat
online could readily determine how to
do so.
The only risk created by the
noncompliance is that someone who
wished to register the seat online but
either ignored the online registration
information on the registration card, or
never had the card, would choose not to
register the seat despite the ability to do
so by mail, telephone, or by locating the
Web site information in the owner’s
manual or through a simple online
search. We think the likelihood is far
greater that a person interested in
registering the seat would use one of the
available options. Although provision of
information for registration of child
seats is very important and inclusion of
the Web site address on the label is one
way of making registration easier, we
think the risk created by this particular
noncompliance is very slight and
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA has decided that Graco has met
its burden of persuasion that the
labeling noncompliances described are
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, Graco’s petition is granted
and the petitioner is exempted from the
obligation of providing notification of,
and a remedy for, the noncompliances
under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120;
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and
501.8.
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72441
Issued on: December 13, 2007.
Daniel C. Smith,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E7–24702 Filed 12–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety;
Notice of Delays in Processing of
Special Permits Applications
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: List of Applications Delayed
more than 180 days.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c),
PHMSA is publishing the following list
of special permit applications that have
been in process for 180 days or more.
The reason(s) for delay and the expected
completion date for action on each
application is provided in association
with each identified application.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Delmer F. Billings, Director, Office of
Hazardous Materials Special Permits
and Approvals, Pipleine and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, U.S.
Department of Transportation, East
Building, PHH–30, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue Southeast, Washington, DC
20590–0001, (202) 366–4535.
Key to ‘‘Reason for Delay’’.
1. Awaiting additional information
from applicant.
2. Extensive public comment under
review.
3. Application is technically complex
and is of significant impact or
precedent-setting and requires extensive
analysis.
4. Staff review delayed by other
priority issues or volume of special
permit applications.
Meaning of Application Number
Suffixes.
N—New application.
M—Modification request.
PM—Party to application with
modification request.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
14, 2007.
Delmer F. Billings,
Director, Office of Hazardous Materials,
Special Permits and Approvals.
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 244 (Thursday, December 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72440-72441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24702]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2007-0030; Notice 2]
Graco Children's Products, Inc.; Grant of Petition for Decision
of Inconsequential Noncompliance
Graco Children's Products, Inc. (Graco) has determined that certain
child restraint systems that it recently manufactured do not comply
with labeling requirements pertaining to stating the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) Vehicle Safety Hotline
(Hotline) number and Graco's Web site registration address in paragraph
S5.5.2(m) of 49 CFR 571.213, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 213, Child Restraint Systems. On October 26, 2007, Graco
filed an appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports identifying several million
child restraint systems manufactured between June 21, 2006 and October
26, 2007 that do not comply with the paragraph of FMVSS No. 213 cited
above. On November 30, 2007, Graco filed an amended report pursuant to
49 CFR Part 573 that corrected the time frame for the noncompliant
child restraints identified in the October 26, 2007 report. Graco now
has determined that all child restraint systems that it manufactured
between November 28, 2005 and October 29, 2007, and certain child
restraint systems that it manufactured between September 1, 2006 and
October 29, 2007, do not comply with the paragraph of FMVSS No. 213
cited above. Affected are over eight million child restraint systems.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and the rule
implementing those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556, Graco has petitioned
for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49
U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Notice of receipt of the
petition was published, with a 10-day public comment period, on
November 8, 2007 in the Federal Register (72 FR 63231). Although the
text of that notice clearly indicated that only 10 days would be
permitted for comments, the notice as published showed a comment
closing date of December 10, 2007. On November 16, 2007, a correction
notice (72 FR 64708) was published showing the correct comment closing
date, which was November 19, 2007. No comments were received. To view
the petition and all supporting documents log onto the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Web site at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then
pull down the ``Search for Dockets'' menu tab and follow the online
search instructions to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2007-0030.''
For further information on this decision, contact Mr. Zachary R.
Fraser, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202) 366-5754,
facsimile (202) 366-7002.
Paragraph S5.5.2(m) of 49 CFR 571.213 requires that a child
restraint system be permanently labeled with:
(m) One of the following statements, inserting an address and a
U.S. telephone number. If a manufacturer opts to provide a Web site
on the registration card as permitted in Figure 9a of this section,
the manufacturer must include the statement in part (ii):
(i) ``Child restraints could be recalled for safety reasons. You
must register this restraint to be reached in a recall. Send your
name, address, e-mail address if available (preceding four words are
optional) and the restraint's model number and manufacturing date to
(insert address) or call (insert a U.S. telephone number). For
recall information, call the U.S. Government's Vehicle Safety
Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY: 1-800-424-9153), or go to https://
www.NHTSA.gov.''
(ii) ``Child restraints could be recalled for safety reasons.
You must register this restraint to be reached in a recall. Send
your name, address, e-mail address if available [preceding four
words are optional], and the restraint's model number and
manufacturing date to (insert address) or call (insert a U.S.
telephone number) or register online at (insert Web site for
electronic registration form). For recall information, call the U.S.
Government's Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY: 1-800-
424-9153), or go to https://www.NHTSA.gov.''
There are comparable requirements beyond these labeling requirements.
See S5.6.1.7 of 49 CFR 571.213 concerning printed instructions.
Graco explained that all subject child restraint systems failed to
comply with the above requirements because labels attached to them did
not include Graco's Web site address for electronic registration, which
is required when the manufacturer chooses to provide a Web site on the
registration card. In addition, some models of these restraint systems
also had labels that included an incorrect NHTSA Hotline telephone
number. Graco stated that it has corrected the problem that caused
these errors so that they will not be repeated in future production.
Graco stated that although the Hotline number printed on the labels
is incorrect (i.e., the labels show a NHTSA Hotline telephone number
that the agency once used but had relinquished its rights to), Graco
has procured the former Hotline number and is prepared to have all
calls to that outdated number automatically routed to the correct
number (i.e., the current NHTSA Hotline number) for a period of 7
years.
Graco additionally stated that although its electronic registration
Web site address is not on the restraint systems, its toll-free
telephone number appears in at least two places on all the restraint
systems. Also, full contact information, including the Graco's company
Web site address, appears in the owner's manual of every child
restraint system manufactured by Graco.
Graco stated that neither the incorrect NHTSA Hotline number nor
the absence of Graco's Web site address have any effect on the
crashworthiness of the restraint systems. Therefore, Graco stated that
these noncompliances are inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
In addition, Graco proposed two measures as ``an interim solution
to bring infant and child seats produced with the incorrect label into
substantial compliance.'' First, Graco reiterated its proposal to have
calls to the incorrect NHTSA Hotline number automatically rerouted to
the correct number, which has been made possible by Graco's obtaining
the rights to the old number. Graco also proposed to send a broadcast
e-mail to certain consumers about the importance of registration of
their child restraint systems. The e-mail would include a direct link
to Graco's online registration Web site and be sent to approximately
570,000 consumers who
[[Page 72441]]
have either created baby registries through Graco, requested Graco's
newsletter, or whose names have been acquired from prenatal lists.
Graco believes that providing the direct Graco online registration link
will allow those consumers to register their Graco-brand seats once
they have received the e-mail.
NHTSA Decision
NHTSA regulations specify that child seat manufacturers must
provide the telephone number for the Vehicle Safety Hotline so that
consumers concerned about safety recalls or potential safety-related
defects could contact the agency. That telephone number has been
changed. A rule published on June 21, 2005, in the Federal Register (70
FR 35556) revised the relevant section of the regulations to state the
new telephone number. The effective date for the new telephone number
was June 21, 2006; however, NHTSA issued an amendment on June 21, 2006
(71 FR 35558) that changed the effective date of the new telephone
number to September 1, 2006.
Although the Hotline number printed on the labels is not the
correct number, Graco proposed to redirect calls made to the incorrect
Hotline number to the current Hotline number for a period of 7 years.
Since filing its petition, Graco has in fact redirected those calls so
that anyone who calls the incorrect number is automatically connected
to NHTSA's Hotline. NHTSA has confirmed that this change has been
activated. Also, NHTSA has initiated appropriate measures to reacquire
the incorrect Hotline number from Graco. Once NHTSA has re-acquired the
rights to the old number, calls to that number will continue to be
routed directly to the new Hotline. NHTSA therefore agrees with Graco
that there is no adverse safety consequence from this aspect of the
noncompliance because consumers who call the incorrect Hotline number
will automatically be redirected to the current Hotline number.
Although the Graco models at issue do not have labels containing
Graco's electronic registration Web site address, that address is shown
on the registration cards that come with each new child restraint
system. Those who purchase the seat are, therefore, immediately
presented with the online registration option and the necessary Web
site address where they are most likely to look for it, i.e., on the
product registration card. The additional requirement that the Web site
address also be on the seat label provides helpful information to
owners who have not already registered by using the registration card
or the online option, and may be particularly helpful for subsequent
owners who have not received the registration card. However, even
without the Web site information, the noncompliant label provides the
important information that registration is essential to being notified
of a recall, explains what information needs to be submitted for
registration, and provides Graco's mailing address and telephone number
for that purpose. Therefore, any owner who reads the label will be
informed of the importance of registration and provided with two
methods for accomplishing registration. Also, Graco's company Web site
address appears in every owner's manual, so a person intent on
registering the seat online could readily determine how to do so.
The only risk created by the noncompliance is that someone who
wished to register the seat online but either ignored the online
registration information on the registration card, or never had the
card, would choose not to register the seat despite the ability to do
so by mail, telephone, or by locating the Web site information in the
owner's manual or through a simple online search. We think the
likelihood is far greater that a person interested in registering the
seat would use one of the available options. Although provision of
information for registration of child seats is very important and
inclusion of the Web site address on the label is one way of making
registration easier, we think the risk created by this particular
noncompliance is very slight and inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety.
In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has decided that Graco has
met its burden of persuasion that the labeling noncompliances described
are inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, Graco's
petition is granted and the petitioner is exempted from the obligation
of providing notification of, and a remedy for, the noncompliances
under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120; delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: December 13, 2007.
Daniel C. Smith,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E7-24702 Filed 12-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P