Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 71935-71936 [E7-24574]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
71935
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 19, 2007 / Notices
Number of
respondents
Name of instrument/respondent
Provider Association Directors .................
Addiction Educators ..................................
Treatment Agency Directors .....................
ATTC Activity Participants ........................
Other Unique Regional Partners ..............
Evidence-Based Critical Action Surveys:
ATTC Clinical Supervision Training Participants .................................................
ATTC Motivational Interviewing Training
Participants ............................................
ATTC Treatment Planning MATRS Treatment Participants (Treatment Agency
Directors) ...............................................
Success Case Interview Protocols:
ATTC Clinical Supervision Training Participants .................................................
ATTC Motivational Interviewing Training
Participants ............................................
ATTC Treatment Planning MATRS Training Participants (Treatment Directors) ..
Clinician Self-Assessment Form on Motivational Interviewing .........................................
Survey of Organizational Readiness:
Treatment Agency Directors .....................
TOTAL ...............................................
Send comments to Summer King,
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
Room 7–1044, One Choke Cherry Road,
Rockville, MD 20857AND e-mail her a
copy at summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov.
Written comments should be received
within 60 days of this notice.
Dated: December 12, 2007.
Elaine Parry,
Acting Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E7–24569 Filed 12–18–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
OMB review, in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
Project: SAMHSA/CMHS Initiative to
Evaluate Mental Health
Transformation: 9 State Incentive
Grants—NEW
The Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA), Center for Mental Health
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:40 Dec 18, 2007
Jkt 214001
Responses per
respondent
Total responses
Hours per
response
Total burden
hours
43
158
700
3,000
168
1
1
1
1
1
43
158
700
3,000
168
12
240
1
240
12
⁄
120
360
1
360
12
⁄
180
240
1
240
12
⁄
120
48
1
48
1
48
72
1
72
1
72
48
1
48
1
48
72
12
864
12
⁄
432
240
6,294
1
............................
240
11,121
1⁄2
............................
120
7,688
Services (CMHS), has funded an
Initiative to help grantees transform
their mental health and related service
systems. Mental Health Transformation
State Incentive Grants (MHT SIG)
awards were made to 9 States:
Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland,
Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Texas and Washington.
Associated with this project is an OMBrequired independent evaluation of the
program.
With input from CMHS staff, MHT
SIG State representatives and consumer
and family member consultants, a set of
data collection instruments has been
identified or created for the cross-site
evaluation project. The following survey
instruments will be used: (1) A recovery
measure for adults, (2) a resilience
measure for youth, (3) a system measure
on orientation towards recovery, (4) a
leadership survey, (5) mental health
provider interview guide, (6) GPRA data
collection, and (7) consumer/family
member focus group facilitation guide/
interview guide. Grantees will be
allowed to use recovery, resilience and
system orientation instruments of their
choice as long as it meets identified
CMHS criteria. Discretionary grant
NOMs questions which have already
received OMB approval (No. 0930–
0285) will be used along with the
recovery and resilience instruments
selected by the States. In addition,
during site visits, one each of the
following State staff will be interviewed
using a uniquely developed discussion
guide: MHT SIG Project Director; MHT
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
⁄
⁄
1⁄2
1⁄2
1⁄2
12
22
79
350
1,500
84
SIG Transformation Working Group
Chair; director or senior staff of the
mental health, Medicaid, criminal/
juvenile justice, education,
employment, housing agencies. Phone
interviews will also be conducted using
uniquely developed discussion guides
with Project Directors to determine the
cost impact of the MHT SIG grant in
their State.
GPRA data will be submitted annually
by the grantees into a database hosted
on a password-protected Web extranet
site. The recovery, resilience and system
recovery orientation data for nonimpacted and impacted consumer
groups will be collected by the grantees
at two points: baseline and twelve
months. During grant years 3 and 5,
consumer/family member focus groups/
interviews, leadership surveys, and
State agency staff interviews will be
done. During grant years 3 through 5,
mental health provider interviews will
be done.
The resulting data will help the cross
site evaluation: (1) Determine the extent
to which mental health systems have
become recovery-oriented, (2) determine
the extent to which transformation
results in consumer recovery, (3)
identify the factors contributing to
successful transformation, (4) assist the
MHT SIG program in satisfying GPRA
requirements, (5) determine changes in
client outcomes as measured by NOMs,
and (6) demonstrate the cost efficiency
of the MHT SIG program. The estimated
annual response burden to collect this
information is as follows:
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
71936
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 19, 2007 / Notices
ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RESPONSE BURDEN
Number of
respondents/
state
Number of
states
Instrument
YEAR 1 (2008):
Recovery (non-impacted) .............
Resilience (non-impacted) ............
Leadership survey ........................
Provider interviews .......................
GPRA measures ...........................
Consumer/family involvement .......
State agency staff interviews ........
Cost impact ...................................
Total number
of
respondents
Average
burden/
response
(hours)
Responses/
respondent
Annual burden
(hours)
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
75
75
15
26
1
15
8
1
525
525
105
182
7
105
56
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.5
0.6
0.33
0.5
12
2
1.13
1.5
262.5
315
34.7
91
84
210
63.3
10.5
Subtotal (year 1) ....................
YEAR 2 (2009):
Recovery (impacted) .....................
Recovery (non-impacted) .............
Recovery & system recovery orientation (non-impacted) ............
Resilience (impacted) ...................
Resilience (non-impacted) ............
Leadership survey ........................
Provider interviews .......................
GPRA Measures ...........................
Consumer/family involvement .......
State agency staff interviews ........
Cost impact ...................................
........................
........................
1512
........................
..........................
1070.9
7
2
75
75
525
150
1
1
0.5
0.5
262.5
75
7
7
9
2
9
9
2
2
2
75
75
75
15
26
1
15
8
1
525
525
675
30
234
9
30
16
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.6
0.6
0.33
0.5
12
2
1.13
1.5
525
315
405
9.9
117
108
60
18.1
3
Subtotal (year 2) ....................
YEAR 3 (2010):
Recovery (impacted) .....................
Recovery & system recovery orientation (impacted) ...................
Recovery & system recovery orientation (non-impacted) ............
Resilience (impacted) ...................
Resilience (non-impacted) ............
Leadership survey ........................
Provider interviews .......................
GPRA measures ...........................
Consumer/family involvement .......
State agency staff interviews ........
Cost impact ...................................
Subtotal (year 3) ....................
........................
........................
2721
........................
..........................
1898.5
2
75
150
1
0.5
7
75
525
1
1
2
9
2
7
9
9
7
7
7
........................
75
75
75
15
26
1
15
8
1
........................
150
675
150
105
234
9
105
56
7
2166
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
........................
1
0.6
0.6
0.33
0.5
12
2
1.13
1.5
..........................
150
405
90
34.7
117
108
210
63.3
10.5
1788.4
AVERAGE ......................
........................
........................
2133
........................
..........................
1586
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by January 18, 2008 to:
SAMHSA Desk Officer, Human
Resources and Housing Branch, Office
of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503; due to potential
delays in OMB’s receipt and processing
of mail sent through the U.S. Postal
Service, respondents are encouraged to
submit comments by fax to: 202–395–
6974.
Dated: December 12, 2007.
Elaine Parry,
Acting Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E7–24574 Filed 12–18–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:40 Dec 18, 2007
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket No. DHS–2006–0079]
The Critical Infrastructure Partnership
Advisory Council (CIPAC)
Directorate for National
Protection and Programs, DHS.
ACTION: Update of CIPAC council
membership.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) announced the
establishment of the Critical
Infrastructure Partnership Advisory
Council (CIPAC) by notice published in
the Federal Register on March 24, 2006.
That notice identified the purpose of
CIPAC as well as its membership. This
notice provides (i) the quarterly CIPAC
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75
525
membership update, (ii) instructions on
how the public can obtain the CIPAC
membership roster and other
information on the Council, and (iii)
information on the State, Local, Tribal,
and Territorial Government
Coordinating Council (SLTTGCC) and
their membership within CIPAC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brett Lambo, Partnership and Outreach
Division, Office of Infrastructure
Protection, National Protection and
Programs Directorate, United States
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528, telephone (703)
235–3643 or via e-mail at
brett.lambo@dhs.gov.
Responsible DHS Official: Nancy J.
Wong, Director Partnership Programs
and Information Sharing Office,
Partnership and Outreach Division,
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71935-71936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24574]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information
collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Project: SAMHSA/CMHS Initiative to Evaluate Mental Health
Transformation: 9 State Incentive Grants--NEW
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA), Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS), has funded an
Initiative to help grantees transform their mental health and related
service systems. Mental Health Transformation State Incentive Grants
(MHT SIG) awards were made to 9 States: Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland,
Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas and Washington. Associated
with this project is an OMB-required independent evaluation of the
program.
With input from CMHS staff, MHT SIG State representatives and
consumer and family member consultants, a set of data collection
instruments has been identified or created for the cross-site
evaluation project. The following survey instruments will be used: (1)
A recovery measure for adults, (2) a resilience measure for youth, (3)
a system measure on orientation towards recovery, (4) a leadership
survey, (5) mental health provider interview guide, (6) GPRA data
collection, and (7) consumer/family member focus group facilitation
guide/interview guide. Grantees will be allowed to use recovery,
resilience and system orientation instruments of their choice as long
as it meets identified CMHS criteria. Discretionary grant NOMs
questions which have already received OMB approval (No. 0930-0285) will
be used along with the recovery and resilience instruments selected by
the States. In addition, during site visits, one each of the following
State staff will be interviewed using a uniquely developed discussion
guide: MHT SIG Project Director; MHT SIG Transformation Working Group
Chair; director or senior staff of the mental health, Medicaid,
criminal/juvenile justice, education, employment, housing agencies.
Phone interviews will also be conducted using uniquely developed
discussion guides with Project Directors to determine the cost impact
of the MHT SIG grant in their State.
GPRA data will be submitted annually by the grantees into a
database hosted on a password-protected Web extranet site. The
recovery, resilience and system recovery orientation data for non-
impacted and impacted consumer groups will be collected by the grantees
at two points: baseline and twelve months. During grant years 3 and 5,
consumer/family member focus groups/interviews, leadership surveys, and
State agency staff interviews will be done. During grant years 3
through 5, mental health provider interviews will be done.
The resulting data will help the cross site evaluation: (1)
Determine the extent to which mental health systems have become
recovery-oriented, (2) determine the extent to which transformation
results in consumer recovery, (3) identify the factors contributing to
successful transformation, (4) assist the MHT SIG program in satisfying
GPRA requirements, (5) determine changes in client outcomes as measured
by NOMs, and (6) demonstrate the cost efficiency of the MHT SIG
program. The estimated annual response burden to collect this
information is as follows:
[[Page 71936]]
Estimate of Annual Response Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden/
Instrument Number of respondents/ Total number Responses/ response Annual burden
states state of respondents respondent (hours) (hours)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YEAR 1 (2008):
Recovery (non-impacted)............................ 7 75 525 1 0.5 262.5
Resilience (non-impacted).......................... 7 75 525 1 0.6 315
Leadership survey.................................. 7 15 105 1 0.33 34.7
Provider interviews................................ 7 26 182 1 0.5 91
GPRA measures...................................... 7 1 7 1 12 84
Consumer/family involvement........................ 7 15 105 1 2 210
State agency staff interviews...................... 7 8 56 1 1.13 63.3
Cost impact........................................ 7 1 7 1 1.5 10.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal (year 1).............................. .............. .............. 1512 .............. .............. 1070.9
YEAR 2 (2009):
Recovery (impacted)................................ 7 75 525 1 0.5 262.5
Recovery (non-impacted)............................ 2 75 150 1 0.5 75
Recovery & system recovery orientation (non- 7 75 525 1 1 525
impacted).........................................
Resilience (impacted).............................. 7 75 525 1 0.6 315
Resilience (non-impacted).......................... 9 75 675 1 0.6 405
Leadership survey.................................. 2 15 30 1 0.33 9.9
Provider interviews................................ 9 26 234 1 0.5 117
GPRA Measures...................................... 9 1 9 1 12 108
Consumer/family involvement........................ 2 15 30 1 2 60
State agency staff interviews...................... 2 8 16 1 1.13 18.1
Cost impact........................................ 2 1 2 1 1.5 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal (year 2).............................. .............. .............. 2721 .............. .............. 1898.5
YEAR 3 (2010):
Recovery (impacted)................................ 2 75 150 1 0.5 75
Recovery & system recovery orientation (impacted).. 7 75 525 1 1 525
Recovery & system recovery orientation (non- 2 75 150 1 1 150
impacted).........................................
Resilience (impacted).............................. 9 75 675 1 0.6 405
Resilience (non-impacted).......................... 2 75 150 1 0.6 90
Leadership survey.................................. 7 15 105 1 0.33 34.7
Provider interviews................................ 9 26 234 1 0.5 117
GPRA measures...................................... 9 1 9 1 12 108
Consumer/family involvement........................ 7 15 105 1 2 210
State agency staff interviews...................... 7 8 56 1 1.13 63.3
Cost impact........................................ 7 1 7 1 1.5 10.5
Subtotal (year 3).............................. .............. .............. 2166 .............. .............. 1788.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE.................................... .............. .............. 2133 .............. .............. 1586
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed
information collection should be sent by January 18, 2008 to: SAMHSA
Desk Officer, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management
and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503; due to potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of mail
sent through the U.S. Postal Service, respondents are encouraged to
submit comments by fax to: 202-395-6974.
Dated: December 12, 2007.
Elaine Parry,
Acting Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E7-24574 Filed 12-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
