Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 71354-71355 [E7-24368]

Download as PDF ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES 71354 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Notices (732) 537–6040; fax: (732) 537–6095; thomas.drewes@nj.usda.gov. New Mexico: Dennis Alexander, Suite 305, 6200 Jefferson Street, NE., Albuquerque, NM 87109–3734; phone: (505) 761–4400; fax: (505) 761–4481; dennis.alexander@nm.usda.gov. New York: Ron Alvarado, Suite 354, 441 South Salina Street, Syracuse, NY 13202–2450; phone: (315) 477–6504; fax: (315) 477–6550; ron.alvarado@ny.usda.gov. North Carolina: Mary K. Combs, Suite 205, 4405 Bland Road, Raleigh, NC 27609–6293; phone: (919) 873–2102; fax: (919) 873–2156; mary.combs@nc.usda.gov. North Dakota: J.R. Flores, Jr., Room 278, 220 E. Rosser Avenue, Post Office Box 1458, Bismarck, ND 58502–1458; phone: (701) 530–2000; fax: (701) 530–2110; jr.flores@nd.usda.gov. Ohio: Terry Cosby, Room 522, 200 North High Street, Columbus, OH 43215–2478; phone: (614) 255–2500; fax: (614) 255–2548; terry.cosby@oh.usda.gov. Oklahoma: Ronald L. Hilliard, USDA Agri-Center Building, Suite 206, 100 USDA, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074– 2655; phone: (405) 742–1204; fax: (405) 742–1126; ron.hilliard@ok.usda.gov. Oregon: Robert Graham, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 900, Portland, OR 97232; phone: (503) 414–3200; fax: (503) 414–3103; bob.graham@or.usda.gov. Pacific Basin: Larry Yamamoto, Director, FHB Building, Suite 301, 400 Route 8, Mongmong, GU 96910; phone: (671) 472–7490; fax: (671) 472–7288; larry.yamamoto@pb.usda.gov. Pennsylvania: Craig Derickson, Suite 340, 1 Credit Union Place, Harrisburg, PA 17110–2993; phone: (717) 237– 2200; fax: (717) 237–2238; craig.derickson@pa.usda.gov. Rhode Island: Roylene Rides at the Door, Suite 46, 60 Quaker Lane, Warwick, RI 02886–0111; phone: (401) 828–1300; fax: (401) 828–0433; roylene.rides-at-the-door@ri.usda.gov. South Carolina: Walter W. Douglas, Strom Thurmond Federal Building, Room 950, 1835 Assembly Street, Columbia, SC 29201–2489; phone: (803) 253–3935; fax: (803) 253–3670; walt.douglas@sc.usda.gov. South Dakota: Janet L. Oertly, Federal Building, Room 203, 200 Fourth Street, SW., Huron, SD 57350–2475; phone: (605) 352–1200; fax: (605) 352–1288; janet.oertly@sd.usda.gov. Tennessee: J. Kevin Brown, 675 U.S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville, TN 37203–3878; phone: (615) 277– VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:28 Dec 14, 2007 Jkt 214001 2531; fax: (615) 277–2578; kevin.brown@tn.usda.gov. Texas: Donald W. Gohmert, W.R. Poage Federal Building, 101 South Main Street, Temple, TX 76501–7602; phone: (254) 742–9800; fax: (254) 742–9819; don.gohmert@tx.usda.gov. Utah: Sylvia Gillen, W.F. Bennett Federal Building, Room 4402, 125 South State Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 or Post Office Box 11350, Salt Lake City, UT 84147–0350, phone: (801) 524–4550, fax: (801) 524–4403; sylvia.gillen@ut.usda.gov. Vermont: Judith Doerner, Suite 105, 356 Mountain View Drive, Colchester, VT 05446; phone: (802) 951–6795; fax: (802) 951–6327; judy.doerner@vt.usda.gov. Virginia: Jack Bricker, Culpeper Building, Suite 209, 1606 Santa Rosa Road, Richmond, VA 23229–5014; phone: (804) 287–1691; fax: (804) 287–1737; jack.bricker@va.usda.gov. Washington: Raymond L. ‘‘Gus’’ Hughbanks, Rock Pointe Tower II, Suite 450, W. 316 Boone Avenue, Spokane, WA 99201–2348; phone: (509) 323–2900; fax: (509) 323–2909; raymond.hughbanks@wa.usda.gov. West Virginia: Kevin Wickey, Room 301, 75 High Street, Morgantown, WV 26505; phone: (304) 284–7540; fax: (304) 284–4839; kevin.wickey@wv.usda.gov. Wisconsin: Patricia S. Leavenworth, 8030 Excelsior Drive, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53717; phone: (608) 662–4422; fax: (608) 662–4430; pat.leavenworth@wi.usda.gov. Wyoming: Xavier Montoya, Federal Building, Room 3124, 100 East B Street, Casper, WY 82601–1911; phone: (307) 261–6453; fax: (307) 261–6490; xavier.montoya@wy.usda.gov. [FR Doc. E7–24411 Filed 12–14–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–16–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–892] Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: December 17, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marin Weaver or Blanche Ziv, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, Room 1870, AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2336 and (202) 482–4207, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 1, 2006, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbazole violet pigment 23 from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 71 FR 69543 (December 1, 2006). On December 29, 2006, Nation Ford Chemical Company and Sun Chemical Company (‘‘Petitioners’’) requested that the Department conduct an administrative review of 13 companies, including Trust Chem Co. Ltd. (‘‘Trust Chem’’). On January 4, 2007, Trust Chem also requested an administrative review of its exports. The Department published a notice of initiation of the antidumping duty administrative review of carbazole violet pigment 23 from the PRC for the period December 1, 2005, through November 30, 2006, covering the 13 companies. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 72 FR 5005 (February 2, 2007). On May 2 and May 3, 2007, Petitioners withdrew their request for an administrative review of the 12 companies for which they were the sole requestor. On June 25, 2007, the Department published a notice rescinding the review on these 12 companies. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 72 FR 34670 (June 25, 2007). Therefore, Trust Chem is the sole party who remained covered by this administrative review. Rescission of Review On November 19, 2007, the Department issued a memorandum stating its intent to rescind the administrative review on Trust Chem because there are no entries on which the Department can assess duties during the POR. See Memorandum regarding, ‘‘Intent to Rescind Antidumping Duty Administrative Review on Trust Chem Company Limited for Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People’s Republic of China’’ (November 19, 2007) (‘‘Intent E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM 17DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2007 / Notices to Rescind Memo’’). As stated in the Intent to Rescind Memo, it is the Department’s practice not to conduct an administrative review when there are no entries to be reviewed. Furthermore, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department will rescind an administrative review in whole or with respect to a particular exporter if it concludes that during the POR there were ‘‘no entries, exports, or sales of the subject merchandise.’’ Id. For a detailed discussion of the specific reasons the Department is rescinding this review with regard to Trust Chem, which are not subject to public summary, see the Intent to Rescind Memo. The Department invited all interested parties to submit comments on its Intent to Rescind Memo, but did not receive any comments. Therefore, based on the Department’s practice supported by substantial precedent, the Department is rescinding the review with respect to Trust Chem, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).1 Notification Regarding APOs This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: December 10, 2007. Gary Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E7–24368 Filed 12–14–07; 8:45 am] ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 1 See e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Products from Italy: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 39299, 39302 (July 12, 2006). See also Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Portable Electric Typewriters from Japan, 56 FR 14072, 14073 (April 5, 1991). VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:28 Dec 14, 2007 Jkt 214001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–868] Folding Metal Tables and Chairs from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published its preliminary results of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on folding metal tables and chairs (‘‘FMTCs’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) on July 11, 2007. The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is June 1, 2005, through May 31, 2006. We invited interested parties to comment on our preliminary results. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made changes to our margin calculations. Therefore, the final results differ from the preliminary results. The final dumping margins for this review are listed in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section below. EFFECTIVE DATE: December 17, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel LaCivita or Charles Riggle, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–4243 or (202) 482– 0650, respectively. AGENCY: Background On July 11, 2007, the Department published its preliminary results.1 On July 31, 2007, Meco Corporation (‘‘Meco’’), the petitioner in the underlying investigation, provided additional comments on the appropriate surrogate values to use as a means of valuing the factors of production, including financial statements from Infiniti Modules Pvt. Ltd. (‘‘Infiniti’’) and Agew Steel Manufactures Private Limited (‘‘Agew’’), Indian producers of merchandise that is identical or comparable to the subject merchandise. On August 3, 2007, Meco requested an extension of the briefing schedule, and on August 7, 2007, the Department denied this request. On August 10, 2007, the Department received a case brief that included a request for a hearing from Meco. On August 13, 2007, 1 See Folding Metal Tables and Chairs from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 72 FR 37703 (July 11, 2007) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 71355 the Department received a case brief from Feili Group (Fujian) Co., Ltd. and Feili Furniture Development Limited Quanzhou City (collectively ‘‘Feili’’). On August 13, 2007, Meco requested an extension to submit its rebuttal brief and on the same day, the Department granted to all parties a seven-day extension to submit rebuttal briefs. On August 22, 2007, Meco, New–Tec Integration Co., Ltd. (‘‘New–Tec’’), and Feili submitted rebuttal briefs. On September 27, 2007, Meco withdrew its request for a hearing. On November 6, 2007, the Department extended the time period for completion of the final results until December 7, 2007.2 We have conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.213. Scope of Order The products covered by this order consist of assembled and unassembled folding tables and folding chairs made primarily or exclusively from steel or other metal, as described below: 1) Assembled and unassembled folding tables made primarily or exclusively from steel or other metal (folding metal tables). Folding metal tables include square, round, rectangular, and any other shapes with legs affixed with rivets, welds, or any other type of fastener, and which are made most commonly, but not exclusively, with a hardboard top covered with vinyl or fabric. Folding metal tables have legs that mechanically fold independently of one another, and not as a set. The subject merchandise is commonly, but not exclusively, packed singly, in multiple packs of the same item, or in five piece sets consisting of four chairs and one table. Specifically excluded from the scope of the order regarding folding metal tables are the following: a. Lawn furniture; b. Trays commonly referred to as ‘‘TV trays;’’ c. Side tables; d. Child–sized tables; e. Portable counter sets consisting of rectangular tables 36’’ high and matching stools; and, f. Banquet tables. A banquet table is a rectangular table with a plastic or laminated wood table top approximately 28’’ to 36’’ wide by 48’’ to 96’’ long and with a set of folding legs at each end of the table. 2 See Folding Metal Tables and Chairs from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 72 FR 62628 (November 6, 2007). E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM 17DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 241 (Monday, December 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71354-71355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24368]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-892]


Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People's Republic of China: 
Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 17, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marin Weaver or Blanche Ziv, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, Room 1870, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
2336 and (202) 482-4207, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 1, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published a notice of opportunity to request an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbazole violet 
pigment 23 from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). See 
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended 
Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 71 FR 
69543 (December 1, 2006). On December 29, 2006, Nation Ford Chemical 
Company and Sun Chemical Company (``Petitioners'') requested that the 
Department conduct an administrative review of 13 companies, including 
Trust Chem Co. Ltd. (``Trust Chem''). On January 4, 2007, Trust Chem 
also requested an administrative review of its exports. The Department 
published a notice of initiation of the antidumping duty administrative 
review of carbazole violet pigment 23 from the PRC for the period 
December 1, 2005, through November 30, 2006, covering the 13 companies. 
See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 72 FR 5005 (February 2, 
2007). On May 2 and May 3, 2007, Petitioners withdrew their request for 
an administrative review of the 12 companies for which they were the 
sole requestor. On June 25, 2007, the Department published a notice 
rescinding the review on these 12 companies. See Carbazole Violet 
Pigment 23 From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Rescission, 
in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 72 FR 34670 (June 
25, 2007). Therefore, Trust Chem is the sole party who remained covered 
by this administrative review.

Rescission of Review

    On November 19, 2007, the Department issued a memorandum stating 
its intent to rescind the administrative review on Trust Chem because 
there are no entries on which the Department can assess duties during 
the POR. See Memorandum regarding, ``Intent to Rescind Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review on Trust Chem Company Limited for Carbazole 
Violet Pigment 23 from the People's Republic of China'' (November 19, 
2007) (``Intent

[[Page 71355]]

to Rescind Memo''). As stated in the Intent to Rescind Memo, it is the 
Department's practice not to conduct an administrative review when 
there are no entries to be reviewed. Furthermore, pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(3), the Department will rescind an administrative review in 
whole or with respect to a particular exporter if it concludes that 
during the POR there were ``no entries, exports, or sales of the 
subject merchandise.'' Id. For a detailed discussion of the specific 
reasons the Department is rescinding this review with regard to Trust 
Chem, which are not subject to public summary, see the Intent to 
Rescind Memo.
    The Department invited all interested parties to submit comments on 
its Intent to Rescind Memo, but did not receive any comments. 
Therefore, based on the Department's practice supported by substantial 
precedent, the Department is rescinding the review with respect to 
Trust Chem, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel 
Products from Italy: Final Results and Partial Rescission of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 39299, 39302 (July 12, 
2006). See also Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review: Portable Electric Typewriters from Japan, 56 
FR 14072, 14073 (April 5, 1991).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification Regarding APOs

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of 
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: December 10, 2007.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-24368 Filed 12-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.