Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 69709-69711 [E7-23795]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 236 / Monday, December 10, 2007 / Notices
VERMONT
Caledonia County
Fairbanks Museum, 1302 Main St., St.
Johnsbury, 07001344.
Union Meeting House, (Religious Buildings,
Sites and Structures in Vermont MPS),
2614 Burke Hollow Rd., Burke, 07001345.
Windham County
Rockingham Village Historic District,
Meeting House Rd., Rockingham Hill Rd.,
Rockingham, 07001346.
WISCONSIN
Milwaukee County
Spencerian Business College, 2800 W Wright
St., Milwaukee, 07001347.
A request for removal has been made for
the following resources:
OREGON
Multnomah County
Ladd Carriage House, 1331 SW Broadway,
Portland, 8003369.
Parker, C.W., Four-Row Park Carousel, 1492
Jantzen Beach Center, Portland, 87001381.
Trinity Lutheran Church and School, 108 NE
Ivy, Portland, 80003377.
[FR Doc. 07–5995 Filed 12–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–51–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—American Society of
Mechanical Engineers
Notice is hereby given that, on
November 2, 2007, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301, et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (‘‘ASME’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing additions or
changes to its standards development
activities. The notifications were filed
for the purpose of extending the Act’s
provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, since July 10, 2007, ASME
has published one new standard and
initiated one new standards activity
within the general nature and scope of
ASME’s standards development
activities, as specified in its original
notification. More details regarding
these changes can be found at https://
www.asme.org.
On September 15, 2004, ASME filed
its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Dec 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on October 13, 2004 (69
FR 60895).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on July 11, 2007. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on September 11, 2007 (72 FR
51839).
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 07–5996 Filed 12–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Joint Development Under
ATP Award No. 70NANB7H7007
Notice is hereby given that, on
October 17, 2007, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301, et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Joint
Development under ATP Award No.
70NANB7H7007 has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing (1) the identities
of the parties to the venture and (2) the
nature and objectives of the venture.
The notifications were filed for the
purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act,
the identities of the parties to the
venture are: Caterpillar Inc., Mossville,
IL and The Lubrizol Corporation,
Wickliffe, OH. The general area of Joint
Development under ATP Award No.
70NANB7H7007’s planned activity is to
perform research in the field of
integrated surface technologies for 21st
century drive trains. The activity of this
joint development project will be
partially funded by an award from the
Advanced Technology Program,
National Institute of Standards and
Technology, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 07–5997 Filed 12–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69709
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
period of November 13 through
November 23, 2007.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of section 222(a)
of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
69710
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 236 / Monday, December 10, 2007 / Notices
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm
and a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of section 222(b)
of the Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Dec 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W–62,364; Cellular Express, Inc., d/
b/a/ Boston Communications
Group, Inc., Bedford, MA: October
25, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act
have been met.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–62,279; Titan Tool, Inc.,
Including On-Site Leased Workers
from Assurance, Oakland, NJ: October
9, 2006.
TA–W–62,280; UCO Spinning, L.P., A
Subsidiary of UCO Fabrics, Inc.,
Snyder, TX: October 9, 2006.
TA–W–62,435; Huffman Finishing
Company, Inc., Granite Falls, NC:
November 5, 2006.
TA–W–62,082; LexaMar Corporation,
Decoma International Division, OnSite Leased Workers from Northern
Staffing; Boyne City, MI: August 29,
2006.
TA–W–62,200; Plum Creek, Ksanka
Sawmill, Fortine, MT: September 21,
2006.
TA–W–62,223; Bodine Corporation;
Bridgeport, CT: September 28, 2006.
TA–W–62,246; Aristech Chemical
Corporation; Neville Island Plant,
Neville Island, PA: October 1, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
TA–W–62,269; Norwalk Furniture
Corporation of Tennessee, Cookeville,
TN: October 5, 2006.
TA–W–62,029; Foxcroft Sportswear, Fall
River, MA: August 21, 2006.
TA–W–62,109; FabCare International,
LLC, Celina, TN: September 4, 2006.
TA–W–62,237; Linzhi Fashion, Inc.,
New York, NY: September 30, 2006.
TA–W–62,383; Jasper C. Fashion, Inc.,
New York, NY: October 15, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and
section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–62,324; Flynn Enterprises Inc.,
LLC; Distribution Warehouse;
Hopkinsville, KY: October 17, 2006.
TA–W–62,352; Weyerhaeuser Company,
ilevel Division; Ironton, MN: October
23, 2006.
TA–W–62,360; GE Aviation; Formerly
Smiths Aerospace LLC, Motor
Winding Group; Corona, CA: October
24, 2006.
TA–W–62,379; Federal Mogul Ignition
Company, Burlington, IA: October 15,
2006.
TA–W–62,387; SAF Holland USA, Inc.,
Warrenton Division; Warrenton, MO:
October 22, 2006.
TA–W–62,393; American Axle and
Manufacturing, Inc., Buffalo Gear and
Axle Facility, Buffalo, NY: October 18,
2006.
TA–W–62,396; Atreum-Brighton;
Decoma Int’l Div., Qualified Staffing,
Aerotek, Brighton, MI: October 30,
2006.
TA–W–62,398; Federal Mogul
Corporation; Wiper Product Division;
Michigan City, IN: November 1, 2006.
TA–W–61,989; Yellow Book USA;
Formerly MacGregor Publishing Co.,
Mount Vernon, WA: August 10, 2006.
TA–W–62,428; Home Products
International, Mooresville, NC:
November 6, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade
Act have been met.
TA–W–62,186; TRW Automotive U.S.
LLC; Commercial Steering Division;
Lebanon, TN: September 20, 2006.
TA–W–62,227; Plastech Engineered
Products, Inc., Fowlerville Division,
Fowlerville, MI: September 17,
2006.
TA–W–62,295; Temple Inland—Hope
Forest Products Division; Hope, AR:
October 11, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of section
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 236 / Monday, December 10, 2007 / Notices
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) and section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of section 246 has not been
met. The firm does not have a
significant number of workers 50 years
of age or older.
None.
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
None.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
TA–W–62,364; Cellular Express, Inc., d/
b/a/ Boston Communications
Group, Inc., Bedford, MA.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
TA–W–62,272; Flint Group, Inc.,
Plymouth, MI.
TA–W–62,293; Truck Specialty Center
(TSC), International Truck and
Engine Corporation; Springfield,
OH.
TA–W–62,414; Consistent Textile
Industries, Inc., Dallas, NC.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Dec 07, 2007
Jkt 214001
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–62,247; Soller, LLC,
Bennettsville, SC.
TA–W–62,255; Liqui-Box Corporation;
Upper Sandusky, OH.
TA–W–62,358; Pelican and Company
Manufacturing Group, LLC;
Winnsboro, LA.
TA–W–62,052; Freescale
Semiconductor, Inc., New Product
Introduction (NPI), CS1 Factory,
Tempe, AZ.
TA–W–62,325; Triton Operations, d/b/a
Webster Hardwoods LLC; Bangor,
WI.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–W–62,290; Wachovia Corp.,
Disbursement Dept., Retirement
Service Div., Charlotte, NC.
TA–W–62,326; Kasper LTD., Secaucus,
NJ.
TA–W–62,333; Liberty Fibers
Corporation; Lowland, TN.
TA–W–62,347; Alliance Title Company;
Campbell, CA.
TA–W–62,361; Kantar Operations, Rock
Island, IL.
TA–W–62,366; Curves; Berlin, NH.
TA–W–62,378; Concentra Health
Solutions, Workers Employed at
Continental Tire North America;
Charlotte, NC.
TA–W–62,421; RCN Telecom Services,
Wilkes-Barre, PA.
TA–W–62,449; Newburgh Hardwood
Co., Inc., Newburgh, IN.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of November
13 through November 23, 2007. Copies
of these determinations are available for
inspection in Room C–5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
during normal business hours or will be
mailed to persons who write to the
above address.
Dated: November 28, 2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–23795 Filed 12–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69711
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,340]
Commonwealth Land Title Co.,
Northern CA Production Center, a
Division of LandAmerica Financial
Group, Inc., Martinez, California;
Notice of Negative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated November 16,
2007, the petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department’s negative determination
regarding eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA),
applicable to workers and former
workers of the subject firm. The denial
notice was signed on October 26, 2007
and published in the Federal Register
on November 6, 2007 (72 FR 62682).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or
of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The negative TAA determination
issued by the Department for workers of
Commonwealth Land Title Co.,
Northern CA Production Center, a
division of LandAmerica Financial
Group, Inc., Martinez, California was
based on the finding that the worker
group does not produce an article
within the meaning of Section 222 of
the Trade Act of 1974. The investigation
revealed that workers of the subject firm
are engaged in research, data entry,
analysis, and writing services. The
investigation further revealed that no
production of article(s) occurred within
the firm or appropriate subdivision
within the Commonwealth Land Title
Co. and LandAmerica Financial Group,
Inc. during the relevant time period.
The petitioner contends that the
Department erred in its interpretation of
the work performed by the workers of
the subject firm. The petitioner states
that the Preliminary Title Report cited
in the initial determination document is
‘‘only a by-product of the process’’ and
that the ‘‘real Article is the Title
Insurance Policy’’. The petitioner
further clarifies that the process of
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 236 (Monday, December 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69709-69711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23795]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of November
13 through November 23, 2007.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the
[[Page 69710]]
articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA-W-62,364; Cellular Express, Inc., d/b/a/ Boston Communications
Group, Inc., Bedford, MA: October 25, 2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-62,279; Titan Tool, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers from
Assurance, Oakland, NJ: October 9, 2006.
TA-W-62,280; UCO Spinning, L.P., A Subsidiary of UCO Fabrics, Inc.,
Snyder, TX: October 9, 2006.
TA-W-62,435; Huffman Finishing Company, Inc., Granite Falls, NC:
November 5, 2006.
TA-W-62,082; LexaMar Corporation, Decoma International Division, On-
Site Leased Workers from Northern Staffing; Boyne City, MI: August 29,
2006.
TA-W-62,200; Plum Creek, Ksanka Sawmill, Fortine, MT: September 21,
2006.
TA-W-62,223; Bodine Corporation; Bridgeport, CT: September 28, 2006.
TA-W-62,246; Aristech Chemical Corporation; Neville Island Plant,
Neville Island, PA: October 1, 2006.
TA-W-62,269; Norwalk Furniture Corporation of Tennessee, Cookeville,
TN: October 5, 2006.
TA-W-62,029; Foxcroft Sportswear, Fall River, MA: August 21, 2006.
TA-W-62,109; FabCare International, LLC, Celina, TN: September 4, 2006.
TA-W-62,237; Linzhi Fashion, Inc., New York, NY: September 30, 2006.
TA-W-62,383; Jasper C. Fashion, Inc., New York, NY: October 15, 2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-62,324; Flynn Enterprises Inc., LLC; Distribution Warehouse;
Hopkinsville, KY: October 17, 2006.
TA-W-62,352; Weyerhaeuser Company, ilevel Division; Ironton, MN:
October 23, 2006.
TA-W-62,360; GE Aviation; Formerly Smiths Aerospace LLC, Motor Winding
Group; Corona, CA: October 24, 2006.
TA-W-62,379; Federal Mogul Ignition Company, Burlington, IA: October
15, 2006.
TA-W-62,387; SAF Holland USA, Inc., Warrenton Division; Warrenton, MO:
October 22, 2006.
TA-W-62,393; American Axle and Manufacturing, Inc., Buffalo Gear and
Axle Facility, Buffalo, NY: October 18, 2006.
TA-W-62,396; Atreum-Brighton; Decoma Int'l Div., Qualified Staffing,
Aerotek, Brighton, MI: October 30, 2006.
TA-W-62,398; Federal Mogul Corporation; Wiper Product Division;
Michigan City, IN: November 1, 2006.
TA-W-61,989; Yellow Book USA; Formerly MacGregor Publishing Co., Mount
Vernon, WA: August 10, 2006.
TA-W-62,428; Home Products International, Mooresville, NC: November 6,
2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
TA-W-62,186; TRW Automotive U.S. LLC; Commercial Steering Division;
Lebanon, TN: September 20, 2006.
TA-W-62,227; Plastech Engineered Products, Inc., Fowlerville Division,
Fowlerville, MI: September 17, 2006.
TA-W-62,295; Temple Inland--Hope Forest Products Division; Hope, AR:
October 11, 2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section
[[Page 69711]]
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified
eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in
production to Mexico or Canada) and section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the
Trade Act have been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The Department has determined that criterion (1) of section 246 has
not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50
years of age or older.
None.
The Department has determined that criterion (2) of section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
None.
The Department has determined that criterion (3) of section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
TA-W-62,364; Cellular Express, Inc., d/b/a/ Boston Communications
Group, Inc., Bedford, MA.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA,
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.
TA-W-62,272; Flint Group, Inc., Plymouth, MI.
TA-W-62,293; Truck Specialty Center (TSC), International Truck and
Engine Corporation; Springfield, OH.
TA-W-62,414; Consistent Textile Industries, Inc., Dallas, NC.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-62,247; Soller, LLC, Bennettsville, SC.
TA-W-62,255; Liqui-Box Corporation; Upper Sandusky, OH.
TA-W-62,358; Pelican and Company Manufacturing Group, LLC; Winnsboro,
LA.
TA-W-62,052; Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., New Product Introduction
(NPI), CS1 Factory, Tempe, AZ.
TA-W-62,325; Triton Operations, d/b/a Webster Hardwoods LLC; Bangor,
WI.
The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-62,290; Wachovia Corp., Disbursement Dept., Retirement Service
Div., Charlotte, NC.
TA-W-62,326; Kasper LTD., Secaucus, NJ.
TA-W-62,333; Liberty Fibers Corporation; Lowland, TN.
TA-W-62,347; Alliance Title Company; Campbell, CA.
TA-W-62,361; Kantar Operations, Rock Island, IL.
TA-W-62,366; Curves; Berlin, NH.
TA-W-62,378; Concentra Health Solutions, Workers Employed at
Continental Tire North America; Charlotte, NC.
TA-W-62,421; RCN Telecom Services, Wilkes-Barre, PA.
TA-W-62,449; Newburgh Hardwood Co., Inc., Newburgh, IN.
The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified
eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of November 13 through November 23, 2007. Copies of
these determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to
the above address.
Dated: November 28, 2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-23795 Filed 12-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
