Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request: Generic Survey Clearance for Import Injury Investigations, 68896-68898 [E7-23598]
Download as PDF
68896
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2007 / Notices
modify this reality action. In the
absence of any adverse comments, the
classification of the land described in
this notice will become effective on
February 4, 2008. The land will not be
offered for patent until after the
classification becomes effective.
(Authority: 43 CFR 2741.5).
Dated: November 29, 2007.
Joel Farrell,
Assistant Field Manager for Resources.
[FR Doc. 07–5966 Filed 12–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–VB–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
California Bay-Delta Public Advisory
Committee Public Meeting
Cancellation; Federal Register:
November 9, 2007 (Volume 72, Number
217) [Notices] Page 63628–63629]
[DOCID:fr09no07–94] [FR Doc. 07–5597
Filed 11–8–07; 8:45 am]
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Joint meeting of the
California Bay-Delta Public Advisory
Committee and the California Bay-Delta
Authority meeting noticed in the
Federal Register on November 8, 2007,
Volume 72, Number 217, Page 63628–
63629, has been cancelled. The subject
meeting will be rescheduled at a later
date which is yet to be determined.
DATES: The meeting was scheduled for
Thursday, December 13, 2007, from 9
a.m. to 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diane Buzzard, U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation, at 916–978–5022 or Julie
Alvis, California Bay-Delta Program, at
916–445–5551.
Dated: November 26, 2007.
Diane A. Buzzard,
Acting Special Projects Officer, Mid-Pacific
Region, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 07–5948 Filed 12–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–M
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request: Generic Survey
Clearance for Import Injury
Investigations
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:57 Dec 05, 2007
Jkt 214001
Notice of proposed collection;
comment request.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The proposed information
collection is a 3-year extension,
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13) (the
‘‘Act’’), of the current generic survey
clearance previously approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’). The clearance is used by the
U.S. International Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) to issue information
collections (specifically, producer,
importer, purchaser, and foreign
producer questionnaires and certain
institution notices) for a series of import
injury investigations that are required
by the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Trade
Act of 1974. The current generic survey
clearance is assigned OMB control No.
3117–0016; it will expire on June 30,
2008. Comments concerning the
proposed information collections are
requested in accordance with section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Act; such comments
are described in greater detail in the
section of this notice entitled
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
DATES: Written comments should be
received not later than 60 days after
publication of this notice on the Federal
Register to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Signed comments should be
submitted to Marilyn Abbott, Secretary,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the proposed information
collections may be obtained from: Debra
Baker, Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission
(telephone No. 202–205–3180; e-mail
address: Debra.Baker@usitc.gov).
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
Comments are solicited as to (1)
whether the proposed information
collection is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) minimization of the
burden of the proposed information
collection on those who are to respond
(including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses).
Summary of the Proposed Information
Collections
(1) Need for the Proposed Information
Collections
The information requested in
questionnaires and five-year sunset
review institution notices issued under
the generic survey clearance is utilized
by the Commission in the following
statutory investigations: Antidumping
duty, countervailing duty, escape
clause, North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) safeguard, market
disruption, and interference-withprograms of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA). The Commission’s
generic survey clearance to issue
questionnaires will not apply to
repetitive questionnaires such as those
issued on a quarterly or annual basis or
to other investigations and research
studies conducted under section 332 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
The information provided by firms in
response to the questionnaires provides
the basis for the Commission’s
determinations in the above-cited
statutory investigations. The submitted
data are consolidated by Commission
staff and provided to the Commission in
the form of a staff report. In addition, in
the majority of its investigations, the
Commission releases completed
questionnaires returned by industry
participants to representatives of parties
to its investigations under the terms of
an administrative protective order, the
terms of which safeguard the
confidentiality of any business
proprietary or business confidential
information. Representatives of
interested parties also receive a
confidential version of the staff report
under the administrative protective
order. Subsequent party submissions to
the Commission during the investigative
process are based, in large part, upon
their review of the information
collected.
Included in the proposed generic
clearance are the institution notices for
the five-year sunset reviews of
antidumping and countervailing duty
orders and suspended investigations.
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
68897
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2007 / Notices
Responses to the institution notices will
be evaluated by the Commission and
form much of the record for its
determinations to conduct either
expedited or full five-year sunset
reviews of existing antidumping and
countervailing duty orders.
(2) Information Collection Plan
Questionnaires for specific
investigations are sent to all identified
domestic producers manufacturing the
product(s) in question. Importer and
purchaser questionnaires are also sent to
all substantial importers/purchasers of
the product(s). Finally, all foreign
manufacturers of the product(s) in
question that are represented by counsel
are sent questionnaires, and, in
addition, the Commission attempts to
contact any other foreign manufacturers,
especially if they export the product(s)
in question to the United States. Firms
receiving questionnaires include
businesses, farms, and/or other forprofit institutions; responses are
mandatory.
The institution notices for the fiveyear sunset reviews are published in the
Federal Register and solicit comment
from interested parties (i.e., U.S.
producers within the industry in
question as well as labor unions or
representative groups of workers, U.S.
importers and foreign exporters, and
involved foreign country governments).
(3) Description of the Information To Be
Collected
Although the content of each
questionnaire will differ based on the
needs of a particular investigation,
questionnaires are based on longestablished, generic formats. Producer
questionnaires generally consist of the
following four parts: (part I) General
questions relating to the organization
and activities of the firm; (part II) data
on capacity, production, inventories,
employment, and the quantity and value
of the firm’s shipments and purchases
from various sources; (part III) financial
data, including income-and-loss data on
the product in question, data on asset
valuation, research and development
expenses, and capital expenditures; and
(part IV) pricing and market factors.
(Questionnaires may, on occasion, also
contain part V, an abbreviated version of
the above-listed parts, used for gathering
data on additional product categories.)
Importer questionnaires generally
consist of three parts: (part I) General
questions relating to the organization
and activities of the firm; (part II) data
on the firm’s imports and the shipment
and inventories of its imports; and (part
III) pricing and market factors similar to
that requested in the producer
questionnaire.
Purchaser questionnaires generally
consist of five parts: (part I) General
questions relating to the organization
and activities of the firm; (part II) data
concerning the purchases of the product
by the firm; (part III) market
characteristics and purchasing practices;
(part IV) comparisons between imported
and U.S.-produced product; and (part V)
actual purchase prices for specific types
of domestic and subject imported
products and the names of the firm’s
vendors.
Foreign producer questionnaires
generally consist of (part I) general
questions relating to the organization
and activities of the firm; (part II) data
concerning the firm’s manufacturing
operations; and may include (part III)
market factors.
The notices of institution for the fiveyear sunset reviews include 11 specific
requests for information that firms are to
provide if their response is to be
considered by the Commission.
(4) Estimated Burden of the Proposed
Information Collection
The Commission estimates that
information collections issued under the
requested generic clearance will impose
an average annual burden of 183,000
burden hours on 4,900 respondents (i.e.,
recipients that provide a response to the
Commission’s questionnaires or the
notices of institution of five-year sunset
reviews). Table 1 lists the projected
annual burden for each type of
information collection for the July
2008–June 2011 period.
TABLE 1.—PROJECTED AVERAGE ANNUAL BURDEN DATA, BY TYPE OF INFORMATION COLLECTION, JULY 2008–JUNE 2011
Producer
questionnaires 1
Item
Importer
questionnaires 2
Purchaser
questionnaires 3
Foreign
producer
questionnaires 4
Institution
notices for 5year reviews 5
Total
Estimated average burden hours imposed annually for July 2008–June 2011
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Number of respondents ...........................
Frequency of response ............................
Total annual responses ...........................
Hours per response .................................
Total hours ........................................
1,021
1
1,021
49.2
50,233
1,469
1
1,469
42.5
62,432
1,140
1
1,140
24.5
27,930
1,180
1
1,180
34.5
40,710
86
1
86
14.8
1,273
4,896
1
4,896
37.3
182,578
1 Producer questionnaires.—Estimates based upon the following variables: number of respondents (anticipated caseload (×) number of producer respondents per case) and hours per response (responding firm burden (+) outside review burden (+) third-party disclosure burden). See
definitions below. Responding firm burden accounts for 91 percent of the total producer questionnaire burden, outside review burden accounts
for 6 percent of the total burden, and third-party disclosure burden accounts for the remaining 3 percent. (The averages per questionnaire of the
outside review and third-party disclosure burdens are not listed here since they are incurred only for the questionnaires of parties; such averages
for all questionnaires are not meaningful.)
2 Importer questionnaires.—Estimates based upon the following variables: number of respondents (anticipated caseload (×) number of importer
respondents per case) and hours per response (responding firm burden (+) outside review burden (+) third-party disclosure burden). See definitions below. Responding firm burden accounts for 98 percent of the total importer questionnaire burden, outside review burden and third-party
disclosure burden each account for about 1 percent of the total burden. (The averages per questionnaire of the outside review and third-party
disclosure burdens are not listed here since they are incurred only for the questionnaires of parties; such averages for all questionnaires are not
meaningful.)
3 Purchaser questionnaires.—Estimates based upon the following variables: number of respondents (anticipated caseload (×) number of purchaser respondents per case) and hours per response (responding firm burden). See definitions below. Purchasers are not interested parties to
investigations by statute and typically do not engage outside counsel. Therefore, there is minimal outside review burden nor third-party disclosure
burden for purchasers.
4 Foreign producer questionnaires.—Estimates based upon the following variables: number of respondents (anticipated caseload (×) number of
foreign producer respondents per case) and hours per response (responding firm burden (+) outside review burden (+) third-party disclosure burden). See definitions below. Responding firm burden accounts for 62 percent of the total foreign producer questionnaire burden, outside review
burden accounts for another 20 percent, and third-party disclosure burden accounts for 18 percent of the total burden.
5 Institution notices for 5-year sunset reviews.—Estimates based upon the following variables: anticipated five-year review caseload, number of
respondents to each notice, and responding firm burden.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:57 Dec 05, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
68898
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2007 / Notices
Note.—Above estimates include questionnaires for specific investigations where the mailing list consists of fewer than 10 firms. In such instances the majority or all firms within the industry under investigation may be said to receive questionnaires.
Anticipated caseload.—Derived from current Commission budget estimates.
Number of respondents per case.—Defined as the number of firms which return completed questionnaires to the Commission. Current estimates of ‘‘number of respondents per case’’ for the questionnaires were derived from the number of respondents to Commission questionnaires
issued under the generic clearances previously provided to the Commission.
Responding firm burden.—Defined as the time required by the firm which received the questionnaire to review instructions, search data
sources, and complete and review its response. Commission questionnaires do not impose the burden of developing, acquiring, installing and utilizing technology and systems, nor require adjusting existing methodology or training personnel. Current estimates of ‘‘responding firm burden’’
for the questionnaires were derived from the actual burden reported by firms that responded to Commission questionnaires issued under the generic clearances previously provided to the Commission.
Outside review burden.—Time devoted by outside legal and financial advisors to reviewing questionnaires completed by the responding firms
who are their clients prior to submitting them to the Commission.
Third-party disclosure burden.—Time required for outside legal advisors to serve their clients’ questionnaires on other parties to the investigation or review under an administrative protective order.
(5) Minimization of Burden
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
The Commission periodically reviews
its investigative processes, including
data collection, to reduce the
information burden. Questionnaires
clearly state that estimates are
acceptable for certain items. They are
designed in part with check-in type
formats to simplify the response. The
reporting burden for smaller firms is
reduced in that the sections of the
questionnaire that are applicable to their
operations are typically more limited.
Requests by parties to expand the data
collection or add items to the
questionnaire for specific investigations
may not be accepted if the Commission
believes such requests will increase the
response burden while not substantially
adding to the investigative record.
The Commission’s collection of data
through its questionnaires does not
currently involve the interactive use of
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. At this time, completed
questionnaires are usually returned to
the Commission in paper form, although
there are several options available for
filing electronically. Further, the
information provided in response to its
notices of institution for the five-year
sunset reviews is typically submitted in
document form directly to the Office of
the Secretary although it may be
submitted to the Commission’s
Electronic Data Information System
(EDIS) and Electronic Docket.
[OMB Number 1103–NEW]
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Issued: November 30, 2007.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–23598 Filed 12–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:57 Dec 05, 2007
Jkt 214001
Office of Community Oriented Policing
Services; Agency Information
Collection Activities: Proposed
Collection; Comments Requested
30-day notice of information
collection under review: COPS nonHiring progress report.
ACTION:
The Department of Justice (DOJ)
Office of Community Oriented Policing
Services (COPS) will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The revision of
a currently approved information
collection is published to obtain
comments from the public and affected
agencies.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
for 30 days for public comment until
January 7, 2008. This process is
conducted in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Rebekah Dorr,
Department of Justice Office of
Community Oriented Policing Services,
1100 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Proposed collection; comments
requested.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: COPS
Non-Hiring Progress Report.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
None. U.S. Department of Justice Office
of Community Oriented Policing
Services.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Law enforcement and
partner public safety agencies,
institutions of higher learning and nonprofit organizations that are recipients
of COPS Non-Hiring Grants from Fiscal
Year 2007 and forward.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond/reply: It is estimated that
approximately 2,975 annual, quarterly,
and final report respondents can
complete the report in an average of one
hour.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: 3,200 total burden hours.
If additional information is required
contact: Lynn Bryant, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building,
Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 234 (Thursday, December 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68896-68898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23598]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request: Generic Survey Clearance for Import Injury
Investigations
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The proposed information collection is a 3-year extension,
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13) (the
``Act''), of the current generic survey clearance previously approved
by the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB''). The clearance is used
by the U.S. International Trade Commission (``Commission'') to issue
information collections (specifically, producer, importer, purchaser,
and foreign producer questionnaires and certain institution notices)
for a series of import injury investigations that are required by the
Tariff Act of 1930 and the Trade Act of 1974. The current generic
survey clearance is assigned OMB control No. 3117-0016; it will expire
on June 30, 2008. Comments concerning the proposed information
collections are requested in accordance with section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the Act; such comments are described in greater detail in the section
of this notice entitled supplementary information.
DATES: Written comments should be received not later than 60 days after
publication of this notice on the Federal Register to be assured of
consideration.
ADDRESSES: Signed comments should be submitted to Marilyn Abbott,
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the proposed information
collections may be obtained from: Debra Baker, Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission (telephone No. 202-
205-3180; e-mail address: Debra.Baker@usitc.gov). Hearing-impaired
persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000.
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
Comments are solicited as to (1) whether the proposed information
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and (4) minimization of the burden
of the proposed information collection on those who are to respond
(including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses).
Summary of the Proposed Information Collections
(1) Need for the Proposed Information Collections
The information requested in questionnaires and five-year sunset
review institution notices issued under the generic survey clearance is
utilized by the Commission in the following statutory investigations:
Antidumping duty, countervailing duty, escape clause, North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) safeguard, market disruption, and
interference-with-programs of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA). The Commission's generic survey clearance to issue
questionnaires will not apply to repetitive questionnaires such as
those issued on a quarterly or annual basis or to other investigations
and research studies conducted under section 332 of the Trade Act of
1974.
The information provided by firms in response to the questionnaires
provides the basis for the Commission's determinations in the above-
cited statutory investigations. The submitted data are consolidated by
Commission staff and provided to the Commission in the form of a staff
report. In addition, in the majority of its investigations, the
Commission releases completed questionnaires returned by industry
participants to representatives of parties to its investigations under
the terms of an administrative protective order, the terms of which
safeguard the confidentiality of any business proprietary or business
confidential information. Representatives of interested parties also
receive a confidential version of the staff report under the
administrative protective order. Subsequent party submissions to the
Commission during the investigative process are based, in large part,
upon their review of the information collected.
Included in the proposed generic clearance are the institution
notices for the five-year sunset reviews of antidumping and
countervailing duty orders and suspended investigations.
[[Page 68897]]
Responses to the institution notices will be evaluated by the
Commission and form much of the record for its determinations to
conduct either expedited or full five-year sunset reviews of existing
antidumping and countervailing duty orders.
(2) Information Collection Plan
Questionnaires for specific investigations are sent to all
identified domestic producers manufacturing the product(s) in question.
Importer and purchaser questionnaires are also sent to all substantial
importers/purchasers of the product(s). Finally, all foreign
manufacturers of the product(s) in question that are represented by
counsel are sent questionnaires, and, in addition, the Commission
attempts to contact any other foreign manufacturers, especially if they
export the product(s) in question to the United States. Firms receiving
questionnaires include businesses, farms, and/or other for-profit
institutions; responses are mandatory.
The institution notices for the five-year sunset reviews are
published in the Federal Register and solicit comment from interested
parties (i.e., U.S. producers within the industry in question as well
as labor unions or representative groups of workers, U.S. importers and
foreign exporters, and involved foreign country governments).
(3) Description of the Information To Be Collected
Although the content of each questionnaire will differ based on the
needs of a particular investigation, questionnaires are based on long-
established, generic formats. Producer questionnaires generally consist
of the following four parts: (part I) General questions relating to the
organization and activities of the firm; (part II) data on capacity,
production, inventories, employment, and the quantity and value of the
firm's shipments and purchases from various sources; (part III)
financial data, including income-and-loss data on the product in
question, data on asset valuation, research and development expenses,
and capital expenditures; and (part IV) pricing and market factors.
(Questionnaires may, on occasion, also contain part V, an abbreviated
version of the above-listed parts, used for gathering data on
additional product categories.)
Importer questionnaires generally consist of three parts: (part I)
General questions relating to the organization and activities of the
firm; (part II) data on the firm's imports and the shipment and
inventories of its imports; and (part III) pricing and market factors
similar to that requested in the producer questionnaire.
Purchaser questionnaires generally consist of five parts: (part I)
General questions relating to the organization and activities of the
firm; (part II) data concerning the purchases of the product by the
firm; (part III) market characteristics and purchasing practices; (part
IV) comparisons between imported and U.S.-produced product; and (part
V) actual purchase prices for specific types of domestic and subject
imported products and the names of the firm's vendors.
Foreign producer questionnaires generally consist of (part I)
general questions relating to the organization and activities of the
firm; (part II) data concerning the firm's manufacturing operations;
and may include (part III) market factors.
The notices of institution for the five-year sunset reviews include
11 specific requests for information that firms are to provide if their
response is to be considered by the Commission.
(4) Estimated Burden of the Proposed Information Collection
The Commission estimates that information collections issued under
the requested generic clearance will impose an average annual burden of
183,000 burden hours on 4,900 respondents (i.e., recipients that
provide a response to the Commission's questionnaires or the notices of
institution of five-year sunset reviews). Table 1 lists the projected
annual burden for each type of information collection for the July
2008-June 2011 period.
Table 1.--Projected Average Annual Burden Data, by Type of Information Collection, July 2008-June 2011
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Foreign Institution
Producer Importer Purchaser producer notices for 5-
Item questionnaires questionnaires questionnaires questionnaires year reviews Total
\1\ \2\ \3\ \4\ \5\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated average burden hours imposed annually for July 2008-June 2011
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of respondents................................... 1,021 1,469 1,140 1,180 86 4,896
Frequency of response................................... 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total annual responses.................................. 1,021 1,469 1,140 1,180 86 4,896
Hours per response...................................... 49.2 42.5 24.5 34.5 14.8 37.3
Total hours......................................... 50,233 62,432 27,930 40,710 1,273 182,578
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Producer questionnaires.--Estimates based upon the following variables: number of respondents (anticipated caseload (x) number of producer
respondents per case) and hours per response (responding firm burden (+) outside review burden (+) third-party disclosure burden). See definitions
below. Responding firm burden accounts for 91 percent of the total producer questionnaire burden, outside review burden accounts for 6 percent of the
total burden, and third-party disclosure burden accounts for the remaining 3 percent. (The averages per questionnaire of the outside review and third-
party disclosure burdens are not listed here since they are incurred only for the questionnaires of parties; such averages for all questionnaires are
not meaningful.)
\2\ Importer questionnaires.--Estimates based upon the following variables: number of respondents (anticipated caseload (x) number of importer
respondents per case) and hours per response (responding firm burden (+) outside review burden (+) third-party disclosure burden). See definitions
below. Responding firm burden accounts for 98 percent of the total importer questionnaire burden, outside review burden and third-party disclosure
burden each account for about 1 percent of the total burden. (The averages per questionnaire of the outside review and third-party disclosure burdens
are not listed here since they are incurred only for the questionnaires of parties; such averages for all questionnaires are not meaningful.)
\3\ Purchaser questionnaires.--Estimates based upon the following variables: number of respondents (anticipated caseload (x) number of purchaser
respondents per case) and hours per response (responding firm burden). See definitions below. Purchasers are not interested parties to investigations
by statute and typically do not engage outside counsel. Therefore, there is minimal outside review burden nor third-party disclosure burden for
purchasers.
\4\ Foreign producer questionnaires.--Estimates based upon the following variables: number of respondents (anticipated caseload (x) number of foreign
producer respondents per case) and hours per response (responding firm burden (+) outside review burden (+) third-party disclosure burden). See
definitions below. Responding firm burden accounts for 62 percent of the total foreign producer questionnaire burden, outside review burden accounts
for another 20 percent, and third-party disclosure burden accounts for 18 percent of the total burden.
\5\ Institution notices for 5-year sunset reviews.--Estimates based upon the following variables: anticipated five-year review caseload, number of
respondents to each notice, and responding firm burden.
[[Page 68898]]
Note.--Above estimates include questionnaires for specific investigations where the mailing list consists of fewer than 10 firms. In such instances the
majority or all firms within the industry under investigation may be said to receive questionnaires.
Anticipated caseload.--Derived from current Commission budget estimates.
Number of respondents per case.--Defined as the number of firms which return completed questionnaires to the Commission. Current estimates of ``number
of respondents per case'' for the questionnaires were derived from the number of respondents to Commission questionnaires issued under the generic
clearances previously provided to the Commission.
Responding firm burden.--Defined as the time required by the firm which received the questionnaire to review instructions, search data sources, and
complete and review its response. Commission questionnaires do not impose the burden of developing, acquiring, installing and utilizing technology and
systems, nor require adjusting existing methodology or training personnel. Current estimates of ``responding firm burden'' for the questionnaires were
derived from the actual burden reported by firms that responded to Commission questionnaires issued under the generic clearances previously provided
to the Commission.
Outside review burden.--Time devoted by outside legal and financial advisors to reviewing questionnaires completed by the responding firms who are their
clients prior to submitting them to the Commission.
Third-party disclosure burden.--Time required for outside legal advisors to serve their clients' questionnaires on other parties to the investigation or
review under an administrative protective order.
(5) Minimization of Burden
The Commission periodically reviews its investigative processes,
including data collection, to reduce the information burden.
Questionnaires clearly state that estimates are acceptable for certain
items. They are designed in part with check-in type formats to simplify
the response. The reporting burden for smaller firms is reduced in that
the sections of the questionnaire that are applicable to their
operations are typically more limited. Requests by parties to expand
the data collection or add items to the questionnaire for specific
investigations may not be accepted if the Commission believes such
requests will increase the response burden while not substantially
adding to the investigative record.
The Commission's collection of data through its questionnaires does
not currently involve the interactive use of automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology. At this time, completed questionnaires are
usually returned to the Commission in paper form, although there are
several options available for filing electronically. Further, the
information provided in response to its notices of institution for the
five-year sunset reviews is typically submitted in document form
directly to the Office of the Secretary although it may be submitted to
the Commission's Electronic Data Information System (EDIS) and
Electronic Docket.
Issued: November 30, 2007.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-23598 Filed 12-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P