Notice of Amended Final Results in Accordance With Court Decision: Helical Spring Lock Washers from the People's Republic of China, 68562-68563 [E7-23572]
Download as PDF
68562
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
need not respond to requests involving
information not covered by the
information quality guidelines.
.06 The Commission will respond to
all Petitions for Correction within sixty
(60) calendar days of the receipt of the
request by the DCIO, unless there is a
reasonable basis for an extension. The
requester will be told of the right to
appeal the decision.
.07 Appeal
(a) If the requester is not satisfied with
the Commission’s decision on the
request, he/she may appeal to the
Commission’s CIO within thirty (30)
calendar days of the receipt of the
Commission’s decision. This
administrative appeal must include a
copy of the initial request, a copy of the
Commission’s decision, and a written
narrative explaining why the requester
believes the Commission’s decision was
inadequate, incomplete, or in error.
(b) This appeal will be sent to the
Commission’s CIO at the following
address: The Chief Information Officer,
Staff Director’s Office, RE: Information
Quality Appeal, Room 700, 624 Ninth
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20425.
(c) All appeals will be impartially
reviewed by parties other than those
who prepared the Commission’s
decision. The Commission will respond
to all appeals within sixty (60) calendar
days of the CIO’s receipt of the appeal.
(d) If the appropriate Commission
official, whether at the initial or appeal
stage, decides that the requester is
correct and the information should be
corrected, he/she will notify the Staff
Director who will instruct the official to
take appropriate corrective actions.
Appropriate corrective actions may take
a number of forms, including (but not
limited to): Errata pages, personal
contacts via letter or telephone, form
letters, press releases or postings on the
Commission’s Web site. Corrective
measures, where appropriate, should be
designed to provide reasonable notice to
affected persons of such correction.The
Commission will also post information
quality correction requests to its Web
site. The specific information will
include a copy of each correction
request, the Commission’s formal
response(s), and any communications
regarding appeals.
[FR Doc. E7–23526 Filed 12–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–846]
Brake Rotors from the People’s
Republic of China: Extension of Time
Limit for the Final Results of the
Expedited Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frances Veith, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4295.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On July 2, 2007, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) initiated
a sunset review of the antidumping duty
order on brake rotors from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (‘‘the Act’’). See Initiation
of Five–Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 72 FR
35968 (July 2, 2007) (‘‘Initiation
Notice’’). Based on an adequate
response from the domestic interested
party and an inadequate response from
the respondent interested party, the
Department is conducting an expedited
sunset review to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping order
would lead to the continuation or
recurrence of dumping, pursuant to
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and
section 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the
Department’s regulations. See
Memorandum to the International Trade
Commission regarding, ‘‘Expedited
Sunset Review of the AD/CVD Order
Initiated in July 2007,’’ dated August 21,
2007. On November 5, 2007, the
Department published a notice
extending the time limit for the
completion of the final results of this
review by 30 days until November 29,
2007. See Brake Rotors from the
People’s Republic of China: Extension of
Final Results of the Expedited Sunset
Review of Antidumping Duty Order, 72
FR 62430 (November 5, 2007).
Extension of Time Limits for Final
Results
In accordance with section
751(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the Department
may extend the 120–day time period for
making its determination by not more
than 90 days, if it determines that a
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
review is extraordinarily complicated.
As set forth in section 751(c)(5)(C)(i) of
the Act, the Department may treat a
sunset review as extraordinarily
complicated if there are a large number
of issues, as is the case in this
proceeding. In particular, this sunset
review involves complicated issues
pertaining to adequacy of responses,
related party status, and interested party
status. Therefore, the Department has
determined, pursuant to section
751(c)(5)(C)(i) of the Act, that the
second sunset review of brake rotors
from the PRC is extraordinarily
complicated, as the Department must
consider numerous arguments presented
in the domestic interested party’s and
the U.S. importer’s August 1, 2007,
substantive response and each parties’
August 6, 2007, rebuttals to the
substantive responses. Based on the
timing of the case, the final results of
this expedited sunset review cannot be
completed within the statutory time
limit of 120 days. Accordingly, the
Department is extending the time limit
for the completion of the final results by
an additional 32 days, from the
November 29, 2007, extended deadline,
to no later than December 31, 2007, in
accordance with section 751(c)(5)(B) of
the Act.
This notice is published pursuant to
sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: November 29, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–23574 Filed 12–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–570–822
Notice of Amended Final Results in
Accordance With Court Decision:
Helical Spring Lock Washers from the
People’s Republic of China
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2007.
SUMMARY: On July 16, 2007, the Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(‘‘CAFC’’) affirmed the decision of the
U.S. Court of International Trade
(‘‘CIT’’) to sustain the Department of
Commerce’s (‘‘the Department’’) remand
redetermination in the tenth
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on helical
spring lock washers from the People’s
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / Notices
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), for the
period October 1, 2002, through
September 30, 2003. In its
redetermination, the Department
assigned Hangzhou Spring Washer Co.,
Ltd. (also known as Zhejiang Wanxin
Grp (ZWG)) (‘‘HSW’’) a dumping margin
of 19.48 percent, rather than the 0.00
percent calculated in the final results of
the 2002–2003 antidumping duty
administrative review of helical spring
lock washers from the PRC. As there is
now a final and conclusive court
decision in this case, the Department is
amending the final results of the 2002–
2003 antidumping duty administrative
review of helical spring lock washers
from the PRC. FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT: Marin
Weaver or Charles Riggle, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–2336 or (202) 482–
0650, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Background
On May 17, 2005, the Department
published its final results of
antidumping duty administrative
review. See Certain Helical Spring Lock
Washers from the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 70 FR
28274 (May 17, 2005) (‘‘Final Results’’),
and accompanying Issues and Decisions
Memorandum for the administrative
review covering October 1, 2002,
through September 30, 2003. In its Final
Results, the Department calculated an
individual rate for the sole respondent,
HSW. The petitioner in this case,
Shakeproof Assembly Components
Division of Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(‘‘Shakeproof’’), filed a court challenge
(Court No. 05–00404) to the
Department’s Final Results. In the CIT
proceeding, the Department moved for a
voluntary remand, which the court
granted. In the remand redetermination,
Commerce revisited the methodology
employed in the valuation of zinc
plating services and determined to rely
solely on the value submitted by
petitioner, Shakeproof. This resulted in
a recalculation of HSW’s dumping
margin to 19.48 percent. See Final
Results of Redetermination Pursuant to
United States Court of International
Trade Remand Order Shakeproof
Assembly Components Division of
Illinois Tool Works, Inc., Plaintiff, v.
United States, Defendant, and
Hangzhou Spring Washer Co., Ltd.,
Defendant - Intervenor (June 2, 2006).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
On August 25, 2006, the CIT sustained
the final remand redetermination made
by the Department. See Shakeproof
Assembly v. United States, Slip Op.
2006–129, 2006 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS
132 (CIT Aug. 25, 2006).
On October 23, 2006, HSW appealed
the CIT’s decision. Consistent with the
Federal Circuit’s decision in Timken
Company v. United States, 893 F.2d
337, 341 (Fed. Cir. 1990), on November
30, 2006, the Department published a
‘‘Notice of Court Decision Not in
Harmony with Final Results of
Administrative Review,’’ which
continued suspension of liquidation of
the subject merchandise until there was
a ‘‘final and conclusive’’ decision in this
case (71 FR 69204). On July 16, 2007,
the CAFC issued a judgment (without an
opinion) affirming the CIT’s decision
upholding Commerce’s remand
redetermination. The CAFC’s final
judgment was not in harmony with the
Department’s Final Results. Appeals of
this decision were due by October 15,
2007, and HSW did not file an appeal
of the CAFC’s decision.
68563
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–428–841, A–570–925]
Sodium Nitrite from the Federal
Republic of Germany and the People’s
Republic of China: Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Investigations
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Smith (Federal Republic of
Germany) or Magd Zalok (People’s
Republic of China), AD/CVD
Operations, Offices 2 and 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1766 or (202) 482–
4162, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
The Petitions
On November 8, 2007, the Department
of Commerce (the Department) received
Amended Final Results
petitions concerning imports of sodium
nitrite from the Federal Republic of
As the litigation in this case has
Germany (Germany) (German petition)
concluded, the Department is amending
and the People’s Republic of China
the Final Results. The revised dumping
(PRC) (PRC petition) filed in proper
margin in the amended final results is
form by General Chemical LLC
as follows:
(petitioner). See the Petitions on
Sodium Nitrite from the Federal
Exporter
Margin
Republic of Germany and the People’s
Republic of China submitted on
Hangzhou Spring
November 8, 2007. On November 14,
Washer Co., Ltd.
2007, the Department issued a request
(also known as
for additional information and
Zhejiang Wanxin Grp
(ZWG)) ......................
19.48 percent clarification of certain areas of the
petitions. Based on the Department’s
requests, the petitioner filed additional
The Department intends to issue
information on November 19, 2007
appropriate assessment instructions to
(three distinct submissions on General,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection 15
days after publication of this notice, and Germany–only and PRC–only material).
The period of investigation (POI) for
cash deposit instructions to revise the
Germany is October 1, 2006, through
cash deposit rate for the company listed
September 30, 2007. The POI for the
above, effective as of the publication
PRC is April 1, 2007, through September
date of this notice.
30, 2007. See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(i).
This notice is published in
In accordance with section 732(b) of
accordance with sections 735(d) and
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
Act), the petitioner alleges that imports
of sodium nitrite from Germany and the
amended.
PRC are being, or are likely to be, sold
Dated: November 23, 2007.
in the United States at less than fair
Stephen J. Claeys,
value, within the meaning of section
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
731 of the Act, and that such imports
Administration.
are materially injuring, or threatening
[FR Doc. E7–23572 Filed 12–4–07; 8:45 am]
material injury to, an industry in the
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
United States.
The Department finds that the
petitioner filed these petitions on behalf
of the domestic industry because the
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68562-68563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23572]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-570-822
Notice of Amended Final Results in Accordance With Court
Decision: Helical Spring Lock Washers from the People's Republic of
China
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2007.
SUMMARY: On July 16, 2007, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(``CAFC'') affirmed the decision of the U.S. Court of International
Trade (``CIT'') to sustain the Department of Commerce's (``the
Department'') remand redetermination in the tenth administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on helical spring lock washers from the
People's
[[Page 68563]]
Republic of China (``PRC''), for the period October 1, 2002, through
September 30, 2003. In its redetermination, the Department assigned
Hangzhou Spring Washer Co., Ltd. (also known as Zhejiang Wanxin Grp
(ZWG)) (``HSW'') a dumping margin of 19.48 percent, rather than the
0.00 percent calculated in the final results of the 2002-2003
antidumping duty administrative review of helical spring lock washers
from the PRC. As there is now a final and conclusive court decision in
this case, the Department is amending the final results of the 2002-
2003 antidumping duty administrative review of helical spring lock
washers from the PRC. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marin Weaver or
Charles Riggle, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-2336 or (202) 482-0650, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 17, 2005, the Department published its final results of
antidumping duty administrative review. See Certain Helical Spring Lock
Washers from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 70 FR 28274 (May 17, 2005)
(``Final Results''), and accompanying Issues and Decisions Memorandum
for the administrative review covering October 1, 2002, through
September 30, 2003. In its Final Results, the Department calculated an
individual rate for the sole respondent, HSW. The petitioner in this
case, Shakeproof Assembly Components Division of Illinois Tool Works
Inc. (``Shakeproof''), filed a court challenge (Court No. 05-00404) to
the Department's Final Results. In the CIT proceeding, the Department
moved for a voluntary remand, which the court granted. In the remand
redetermination, Commerce revisited the methodology employed in the
valuation of zinc plating services and determined to rely solely on the
value submitted by petitioner, Shakeproof. This resulted in a
recalculation of HSW's dumping margin to 19.48 percent. See Final
Results of Redetermination Pursuant to United States Court of
International Trade Remand Order Shakeproof Assembly Components
Division of Illinois Tool Works, Inc., Plaintiff, v. United States,
Defendant, and Hangzhou Spring Washer Co., Ltd., Defendant - Intervenor
(June 2, 2006). On August 25, 2006, the CIT sustained the final remand
redetermination made by the Department. See Shakeproof Assembly v.
United States, Slip Op. 2006-129, 2006 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 132 (CIT
Aug. 25, 2006).
On October 23, 2006, HSW appealed the CIT's decision. Consistent
with the Federal Circuit's decision in Timken Company v. United States,
893 F.2d 337, 341 (Fed. Cir. 1990), on November 30, 2006, the
Department published a ``Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with
Final Results of Administrative Review,'' which continued suspension of
liquidation of the subject merchandise until there was a ``final and
conclusive'' decision in this case (71 FR 69204). On July 16, 2007, the
CAFC issued a judgment (without an opinion) affirming the CIT's
decision upholding Commerce's remand redetermination. The CAFC's final
judgment was not in harmony with the Department's Final Results.
Appeals of this decision were due by October 15, 2007, and HSW did not
file an appeal of the CAFC's decision.
Amended Final Results
As the litigation in this case has concluded, the Department is
amending the Final Results. The revised dumping margin in the amended
final results is as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exporter Margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hangzhou Spring Washer Co., Ltd. (also known as 19.48 percent
Zhejiang Wanxin Grp (ZWG)).........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection 15 days after publication of this
notice, and cash deposit instructions to revise the cash deposit rate
for the company listed above, effective as of the publication date of
this notice.
This notice is published in accordance with sections 735(d) and
777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: November 23, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-23572 Filed 12-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S