Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Cargo Carrying Capacity, 68442-68466 [E7-22962]
Download as PDF
68442
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2007–0040]
RIN 2127–AJ57
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards; Cargo Carrying Capacity
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this final rule, we (NHTSA)
address the problem of motor home and
recreation vehicle trailer overloading by
amending the Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standards (FMVSS) on tire
selection and rims.
This final rule requires manufacturers
of all motor homes and recreation
vehicle trailers to provide information
to consumers in a label that informs the
consumer about the vehicle’s load
carrying capacity. This information is
helpful both at the time the consumer is
making a purchase decision and as the
consumer uses his or her vehicle. We
also require that the size of tires on
motor homes and recreation vehicle
trailers be the same as the size of the
tires listed on the tire information label.
In addition, this rule provides
regulatory relief for dealers from a
labeling requirement in the safety
standard on tire selection and rims for
light vehicles. The standard’s
requirement can currently require
dealers which add even small amounts
of weight to re-label the vehicles. Under
today’s amendment, any party that adds
weight to a completed vehicle exceeding
the lesser of 1.5 percent of the vehicle’s
gross vehicle weight rating or 100
pounds (before first sale to the retail
customer) is required to disclose this
extra weight on labels affixed to the
vehicles. Lesser amounts of weight may
be added without changing or adding
labels.
It is our belief that this rule
complements the efforts of the
recreation vehicle industry to provide
consumers with information in order to
help reduce overloading motor homes
and recreation vehicle trailers. This
rulemaking was initiated in response to
a petition from Ms. Justine May.
DATES: Effective date: The effective date
for this final rule is June 2, 2008.
Optional immediate compliance is
available as of December 4, 2007.
Petitions for reconsideration: Petitions
for reconsideration of the final rule must
be received not later than January 18,
2008.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
Petitions for reconsideration
of the final rule must refer to the docket
and notice number set forth above and
be submitted to the Administrator,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For non-legal issues, you may call Mr.
William D. Evans, Office of Crash
Avoidance Standards at (202) 366–2272.
His FAX number is (202) 366–2990.
For legal issues, you may call Ms.
Dorothy Nakama, Office of the Chief
Counsel at (202) 366–2992. Her FAX
number is (202) 366–3820.
You may send mail to both of these
officials at National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. The May Petition
B. Joint Industry Petition for Rulemaking
and Interim Relief Concerning Standard
No. 110 Issues
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking of August
31, 2005
III. Overview
A. Summary of Comments
B. Summary of the Final Rule
C. Summary of Significant Differences
Between the NPRM and the Final Rule
IV. Public Comments and NHTSA’s Response
A. Applicability of This Final Rule
1. Whether the Final Rule Should Apply to
All RVs, Not Just to RVs with Gross
Vehicle Weight Ratings Greater than
4,536 Kilograms (10,000 Pounds)
2. Excluding Light RVs from FMVSS No.
110 Labeling Requirements
B. Definitions
1. NPRM
2. The Definition of ‘‘Travel Trailer’’ and
‘‘Motor Home’’
3. NPRM’s Term ‘‘Tongue Load Rating’’ for
RV Trailers
C. GVWR, GAWR and Tire Load
Information for Motor Homes and
Recreation Vehicle Trailers
1. NPRM
2. Requirement that Heavy RVs be
Delivered to the Customer With the
Same Size Tires That are Listed on the
Vehicle Certification Label or Tire
Information Label
3. Whether the ‘‘Make Inoperative’’
Prohibition Applies to the FMVSS No.
110 Vehicle Placard and Optional Tire
Inflation Pressure Label
D. Determining Occupant Capacity Weight
1. NPRM
2. RV Occupant Capacity Weight (OCW)
and the Weight of a Standard Occupant
E. Location of Labels
1. NPRM
2. Revised RV Load Carrying Capacity
Labels
3. Label Locations for Heavy RVs and All
Light Vehicles
4. Location of the FMVSS No. 110 Load
Carrying Capacity Modification Label
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
F. Label Format and Content
1. NPRM
2. Revised RV Load Carrying Capacity
Labels
G. Addition of Weight to FMVSS No. 110
Vehicles and FMVSS No. 120 Motor
Homes and Travel Trailers Between
Vehicle Certification and First Retail
Sale of the Vehicle
1. Proposal Concerning FMVSS No. 110
2. Proposal Concerning FMVSS No. 120
3. Comments and Decision Concerning
Weight Added to Heavy RVs and All
Light Vehicles After Final Vehicle
Certification and Before First Retail Sale
H. Other Issues
1. Whether the Final Rule Should Protect
Against Overloading Tires, Wheels,
Axles and Suspensions on RVs
2. RV Weight and Weighing Issues
3. Numbering in Proposed FMVSS No. 110
Regulatory Text
4. Scope of Notice for Joint Petition Issues
5. Response to Issues of the Joint Petition
6. The Meaning of ‘‘Stated Weight Ratings’’
on FMVSS No. 110 Placards
7. Issues Outside the Scope of this
Rulemaking
V. Final Rule
VI. Leadtime
VII. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
B. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
C. Executive Order 13045 (Economically
Significant Rules Affecting Children)
D. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
F. National Environmental Policy Act
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
H. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
I. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
J. Plain Language
K. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
Final Rule Regulatory Text
I. Background
A. The May Petition
In a petition dated January 21, 2000,
Ms. Justine May petitioned NHTSA to
amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) Number 120, Tire
selection and rims for motor vehicles
other than passenger cars. Ms. May
requested that FMVSS No. 120 be
revised in such a way that motor
vehicles would be equipped with tires
that meet maximum load standards
when the vehicle is loaded with a
reasonable amount of luggage and the
total number of passengers the vehicle
is designed to carry. Ms. May’s stated
reason for her petition was her family’s
personal experience with a fifth-wheel
travel trailer. She stated that there was
no information provided with her trailer
stating its cargo carrying capacity (CCC).
Ms. May believes that loading her
vehicle with cargo for a trip placed it in
an overloaded condition, resulting in
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
tire blowouts. The agency granted Ms.
May’s petition for rulemaking.
B. Joint Industry Petition for Rulemaking
and Interim Relief Concerning Standard
No. 110 Issues
Prior to publication of an NPRM
addressing the May petition, NHTSA
received a Joint Petition for Rulemaking
and Interim Relief concerning certain
FMVSS No. 110 provisions that were
scheduled to take effect on September 1,
2005 regarding vehicle capacity weight
and tire information. The Joint Petition 1
requested a notice of interim final
rulemaking authorizing or clarifying
that the vehicle capacity weight
statement required by FMVSS No. 110
allows for a reasonable tolerance, that
vehicle capacity weight be labeled as
‘‘estimated’’ and as ‘‘originally
manufactured,’’ that placards/labels
may be modified rather than replaced
and that shipping weight or weight
determined by scales of reasonable
accuracy may be used to determine the
additional weight of equipment added
to vehicles.
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking of
August 31, 2005
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
On August 31, 2005, NHTSA
published in the Federal Register (70
FR 51707) (DMS Docket No. NHTSA–
2005–22242), the NPRM to address the
problem of motor home and travel
trailer overloading. The agency
explained in some detail the safety need
for the proposed rule, which would help
to prevent motor home and travel trailer
overloading.2 NHTSA cited data from
the Recreation Vehicle Industry
Association (RVIA) regarding the
number of recreation vehicles and from
the Recreation Vehicle Safety Education
Foundation (RVSEF) showing the scope
of the overloading problem. The agency
described characteristics of motor
homes and travel trailers, explaining
how they may become overloaded, and
cited cargo carrying capacity-related
consumer information and labels that
are currently required by NHTSA.
Finally, NHTSA described cargo
carrying capacity consumer information
and labels currently required or
1 ‘‘Joint Petition’’ means the ‘‘Joint Petition for
Rulemaking and Interim Relief; Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 110; Vehicle
Capacity Weight and Tire Information’’ dated July
29, 2005 which was submitted to NHTSA by a
group of trade organizations through Mike Kastner
(NTEA) and Douglas Greenhaus (NADA). The
document is available in docket NHTSA–2005–
22242–3.
2 For a full explanation of the safety need for the
rulemaking, and data cited in support, please refer
to the NPRM of August 31, 2005 at 70 FR 51707.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
recommended by Transport Canada and
the RVIA.
In the NPRM, we also included
several provisions to address the Joint
Petition concerning FMVSS No. 110.
Included was a proposal to permit
dealers to add weight up to 0.5 percent
of the GVWR (of a vehicle subject to
FMVSS No. 110) before first retail sale,
without need for the dealers to re-label
or re-placard the vehicle.
III. Overview
A. Summary of Comments
In response to the NPRM, NHTSA
received comments from the following:
Adaptive Driving Alliance (ADA);
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers
(Alliance); Association of International
Automobile Manufacturers (AIAM);
Marine Retailers Association of America
(MRAA); National Association of Trailer
Manufacturers (NATM); National
Automobile Dealers Association
(NADA); National Marine
Manufacturers Association (NMMA);
National Mobility Equipment Dealers
Association (NMEDA); National RV
Dealers Association (RVDA); National
Trailer Dealers Association (NTDA);
National Truck Equipment Association
(NTEA); Recreation Vehicle Industry
Association (RVIA); Rubber
Manufacturers Association (RMA); Mr.
Nate J. Seymour (Seymour); Specialty
Equipment Market Association (SEMA);
Toyota Motor North America, Inc.
(Toyota); Mr. James Weston (Weston);
and Mr. Tim Walker (Walker).
Many of the commenters addressed
the applicability of the proposed rule,
and recommended that the final rule
should apply to all motor homes and
travel trailers, not just those with
GVWRs over 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds).
We were also asked to simplify the
definition of ‘‘occupant capacity
weight.’’ Some commenters, notably the
RVIA, asked NHTSA to specify multiple
locations (three) for the labeling
information. There were
recommendations for more detailed
information on cargo carrying capacity,
including definitions of GVWR,
unloaded vehicle weight, and cargo
carrying capacity, and a request for
NHTSA to provide more guidance on
the effects of dealer installed equipment
on cargo carrying capacity and the
distribution of cargo.
Reiterating issues raised in previous
rulemakings, and interpretation letters,
some commenters asked for revisions in
FMVSS No. 110 vehicle (tire)
placarding 3 requirements. Relief was
3 For purposes of this document, ‘‘tire placard’’
means the vehicle placard required by S4.3 of
FMVSS No. 110.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
68443
also supported for instances when
weight is added to a vehicle after final
vehicle certification and before first
retail sale. Many commenters stated that
the relief proposed in the NPRM, 0.5
percent of vehicle GVWR, was too low.
B. Summary of the Final Rule
After considering the public
comments, and for the reasons
discussed in detail later in this
document, we have decided to require
all motor homes and recreation vehicle
(RV) trailers to bear a label that informs
the consumer about the vehicle’s load
carrying capacity. The final rule defines
the term ‘‘recreation vehicle trailer’’
rather than using the term proposed in
the NPRM, ‘‘travel trailer.’’ We also
require that the size of tires on motor
homes and RV trailers be the same as
the size of tires listed on the tire
information label.
For motor homes and RV trailers, we
require labels that display the VIN, the
weight of a full load of water, the unit
weight of water and a cautionary
statement that the weight of water is
part of cargo. Motor home labels must
display the maximum weight of
occupants and cargo and RV trailer
labels must display the maximum
weight of cargo. In addition, for motor
homes, the label must show the safety
belt equipped seating capacity and must
indicate that the tongue weight of a
towed trailer counts as cargo.
To promote a consistent conspicuous
label location, this final rule specifies
that permanent load carrying capacity
labels be affixed to the interior of the
forward-most exterior passenger door on
the right side of the vehicle and be
visible. As an alternative (to address
aesthetic considerations) the rule
permits manufacturers to place a
temporary label to the interior of the
forward-most exterior passenger door on
the right side of the vehicle and apply
a permanent label in the area of the
vehicle specified by FMVSS Nos. 110
and 120 for tire information.
In addition, this final rule adopts a
threshold for correcting load carrying
capacity information on tire placards,
motor home occupant and cargo
carrying capacity (OCCC) labels and RV
trailer CCC labels of the lesser of 1.5
percent of GVWR or 100 pounds, greatly
decreasing the need to correct the
information. When correction of load
carrying capacity is needed, this rule
permits the use of generic labels where
corrected values can be legibly entered
using a black, fine point, indelible
marker. This permits dealers to stock
one generic load carrying capacity
modification label.
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
68444
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
In this final rule, the addition of the
load carrying capacity modification
label is one of three options that can be
used to correct load carrying capacity
information when dealer added weight
exceeds the threshold. Dealers/service
facilities are permitted to: (1) Replace
existing tire placards, motor home
OCCC labels or RV trailer CCC labels
with new placards/labels containing
correct load carrying capacity
information; (2) modify existing tire
placards, motor home OCCC labels or
RV trailer CCC labels so they display
correct load carrying capacity
information; or (3) add a load carrying
capacity modification label within 25
mm of the existing tire placard and/or
the motor home OCCC label or RV
trailer CCC label.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
C. Summary of Significant Differences
Between the NPRM and the Final Rule
This final rule differs from the August
2005 NPRM in the following significant
ways. In the NPRM, NHTSA proposed
that the rule apply to motor homes and
travel trailers with GVWRs greater than
4,536 kg (10,000 pounds). This final rule
applies to all motor homes and
recreation vehicle trailers, regardless of
GVWR. In the NPRM, NHTSA proposed
that in determining cargo carrying
capacity, that the occupant capacity
weight be determined. In this final rule,
we adopt labels that display the
maximum weight allotted for both
occupants and cargo. In the NPRM,
NHTSA proposed one location for the
permanent label—affixed to the interior
of the forward-most exterior passenger
door on the right side of the vehicle.
This location has been adopted in the
final rule. In addition, the final rule
permits manufacturers the option of
placing a temporary label in the
specified location and applying an
identical permanent label in the area of
the vehicle specified by FMVSS Nos.
110 and 120 for tire information.
In the NPRM, NHTSA proposed for
both FMVSS No. 110 and 120 vehicles,
that if weight greater than 0.5 percent of
GVWR is added by the dealer before
first retail sale, the dealer would be
required to correct the stated load
carrying capacity information. In the
final rule, the weight has been adjusted
to the lesser of 1.5 percent of GVWR or
100 pounds.
Finally, in the NPRM, NHTSA
proposed labels with detailed
information on how the cargo carrying
capacity is calculated. In this final rule,
we adopt labels that have been
simplified.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
IV. Public Comments and NHTSA’s
Response
A. Applicability of This Final Rule
1. Whether the Final Rule Should
Apply to All RVs, Not Just to RVs with
GVWRs Greater Than 4,536 kg (10,000
pounds)—In the NPRM, NHTSA
proposed that the new labeling rule
apply to motor homes and travel trailers
over 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds).
Seymour, the RVDA and the RVIA all
commented that the proposed RV
labeling requirements should not be
limited to motor homes and travel
trailers with GVWRs over 4,536 kg
(10,000 pounds) but should apply to all
RVs.
RVDA commented that the proposed
CCC labels for heavy RVs 4 provide
useful information for both consumers
and dealers. It argued that consumers
who purchase light RVs should also
have the benefit of the same detailed
information. RVDA also indicated that if
the proposed regulatory text was made
final, there would be three different
labels for RVs: (1) Heavy RVs would
have the FMVSS No. 120 CCC label
which would most likely replace the
RVIA label; (2) Light RVs would have
the FMVSS No. 110 tire placard with
load carrying capacity information; and
(3) Most light RVs may also have a more
detailed RVIA label. According to that
organization, these different labels for
heavy RVs versus light RVs may confuse
consumers.
RVIA commented that the majority of
‘‘travel trailers,’’ some smaller motor
homes and virtually all RV conversion
vehicles 5 have GVWRs of 4,536 kg
(10,000 pounds) or less and are subject
to the FMVSS No. 110 load carrying
capacity labeling requirements. Travel
trailers with GVWRs greater than 4,536
kg (10,000 pounds) and most motor
homes would be subject to the proposed
FMVSS No. 120 NPRM CCC label. RVIA
recommended consistency of the
information provided to RV consumers
regardless of the RV’s size. RVIA stated
that all RVs regardless of their GVWRs
have the primary function of providing
mobile, temporary, on-site living
quarters, and all contain residential
features such as sleeping
accommodations, bathrooms, cooking
4 Throughout this document, ‘‘light RV’’ means a
recreation vehicle with a GVWR of 4,536 kg (10,000
pounds) or less. ‘‘Heavy RV’’ means a recreation
vehicle with a GVWR of more than 4,536 kg. Motor
homes, travel trailers (as proposed to be defined in
the NPRM) and recreation vehicle trailers are all
subgroups of recreation vehicles (RVs).
5 As defined by RVIA, conversion vehicle means
vans, SUVs and pickup trucks that are
manufactured by an automaker, then altered for
recreational use by a company specializing in
customizing vehicles.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
facilities, water storage and cargo
storage.
RVIA cited its 2004 sales statistics
that approximately 250,300 RVs
shipped were light RVs and would be
subject to FMVSS No. 110 requirements,
and approximately 112,300 RVs shipped
were heavy RVs and would be subject
to FMVSS No. 120 requirements. RVIA
said that if the proposed CCC label
requirements are limited to heavy RVs,
a large portion of the overloading
problem would not be addressed and
different labels for different classes of
RVs would confuse consumers,
minimizing the benefits of the new RV
labeling requirements.
Since NHTSA seeks to apply the load
carrying capacity label requirements
most effectively, it has decided to apply
the new requirements to all RVs that fit
the appropriate definitions, regardless of
GVWR. We believe this is a logical
outgrowth of the proposal, and note that
the request for wider applicability came
from the RVIA and RVDA which
represent approximately 95 percent of
the RV industry, consisting of many
small businesses. As they explained in
the comments, both light and heavy RVs
have similar uses, loading
characteristics, and overloading issues;
a substantial number of RVs sold have
GVWRs of 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds) or
less. Applying this final rule to all RVs
will require RV load carrying capacity
label requirements to appear in both
Standard Nos. 110 and 120.
We note that since the August 2005
NPRM was published, amendments to
Standard Nos. 110 and 120 took effect
on September 1, 2005. Before the
amendments, Standard No. 110 applied
to passenger cars and Standard No. 120
applied to other vehicles. After the
amendments took effect, Standard No.
110 applies to vehicles with GVWRs of
4,536 kg (10,000 pounds) or less, and
Standard No. 120 applies to vehicles
with a GVWR of more than 4,536 kg
(10,000 pounds).
2. Excluding Light RVs from FMVSS
No. 110 Labeling Requirements—As part
of its recommended labeling format,
RVIA suggested that light RVs be
excluded from the labeling requirements
of FMVSS No. 110, and RVs only be
subject to RVIA’s suggested format. If
adopted, RVIA’s recommendation
would mean that for light RVs, load
carrying capacity information would not
be required on the FMVSS No. 110 tire
placard. Manufacturers that are RVIA
members would place RVIA’s suggested
small label with similar load carrying
capacity information in the same area as
the tire placard.
NHTSA has decided not to change the
existing tire placard requirements in
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
FMVSS No. 110. Some of these
requirements have recently become
effective and additional amendments
are scheduled to become effective in the
near future. However, in this final rule,
NHTSA is adding additional language to
FMVSS Nos. 110 and 120 in order to
accommodate the RV load carrying
capacity labeling requirements. As more
fully explained in the section titled
‘‘Location of Labels,’’ this final rule has
an alternative labeling scheme that
prevents duplication of information
when both a tire placard and a motor
home OCCC label or RV trailer CCC
label are located in the same area of the
vehicle.
B. Definitions
1. NPRM—In the August 2005 NPRM,
NHTSA proposed that the rule apply to
motor homes and travel trailers. We
proposed to revise the definition of
‘‘motor home’’ (included in 49 CFR Part
571.3) to refer to ‘‘propane’’ rather than
‘‘LP gas supply’’ and to add a new
definition of ‘‘travel trailer’’ to Part
571.3 as follows:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
Motor home means a multi-purpose
vehicle with motive power that is designed
to provide temporary residential
accommodations, as evidenced by the
presence of at least four of the following
facilities: Cooking; refrigeration or ice box;
self-contained toilet; heating and/or air
conditioning; a potable water supply system
including a faucet and a sink; and a separate
110–125 volt electrical power supply and/or
propane.
Travel trailer means a trailer designed to be
drawn by a vehicle with motive power by
means of a bumper or frame hitch or a special
hitch in a truck bed and is designed to
provide temporary residential
accommodations, as evidenced by the
presence of at least four of the following
facilities: Cooking; refrigeration or ice box;
self-contained toilet; heating and/or air
conditioning; a potable water supply system
including a faucet and a sink; and a separate
110–125 volt electrical power supply and/or
propane.
2. The Definition of ‘‘Travel Trailer’’
and ‘‘Motor Home’’—A definition of
‘‘travel trailer’’ was proposed in the
NPRM since the majority of heavy RV
trailers, including 5th wheel travel
trailers and all other travel trailers are
considered ‘‘travel trailers.’’ As more
fully explained elsewhere in this final
rule, since this final rule applies the
motor home OCCC label and the RV
trailer CCC label to all RVs regardless of
GVWR, the definition must apply to
more types of RV trailers. NHTSA
believes that it is therefore necessary to
make the trailer term being defined
more generic.
In this final rule, NHTSA changes the
term being defined from ‘‘travel trailer’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
to ‘‘recreation vehicle trailer.’’ The load
carrying capacity labeling requirements
in this final rule apply to all vehicles
that meet the definitions of ‘‘motor
home’’ and ‘‘recreation vehicle trailer’’
(RV trailer). RV trailers include all
towable RVs such as folding camping
trailers, conventional travel trailers,
fifth-wheel travel trailers, travel trailers
with expansion ends, sport utility RV
trailers, and all other trailers intended
for recreational purposes that meet the
definition of ‘‘recreation vehicle trailer.’’
Raising similar concerns, NATM
commented that the ‘‘travel trailer’’
definition inadvertently includes
ordinary cargo trailers with built-in
living quarters, trailers that NATM’s
members (few of whom are members of
RVIA) build primarily for transporting
horses, livestock, automobiles and other
commercial products. These cargo
trailers also include four of the six
specified facilities NHTSA proposed as
evidence of temporary living or
residential accommodations.
These ‘‘living quarters’’ or facilities
are often installed after the horse trailer
or auto hauler leaves the trailer
manufacturer’s plant. Since these living
quarter-equipped cargo trailers are
designed primarily to haul commercial
cargo, their living quarters occupy much
less floor space than do RV travel
trailers. The cargo trailers are not
labeled to disclose cargo carrying
capacity. NATM argued that mandating
their labeling with a RV trailer CCC
label would impose an unnecessary
burden upon these manufacturers, most
of which are small businesses.
NATM asked NHTSA to revise the
proposed definition of ‘‘travel trailer’’ to
include the following exception to the
definition: ‘‘* * * except trailers
designed primarily to transport cargo.’’
It argued that this more limited
definition is fully consistent with the
intent of the proposed new consumerlabeling requirement.
NHTSA agrees with NATM that it did
not intend the definition of ‘‘travel
trailer’’ to include the types of
commercial cargo trailers that NATM
described in its comment. Trailers
designed to accommodate cargo such as
livestock and racing cars usually have
ample space and GVWR for such cargo,
and the space allotted for living quarters
is incidental. Therefore, in this final
rule, the definition of ‘‘recreation
vehicle trailer’’ will not include trailers
‘‘designed primarily to transport cargo.’’
NHTSA further notes that trailers
‘‘designed primarily to transport cargo’’
does not include trailers (used for
personal purposes) known as ‘‘sport
utility RVs’’ or ‘‘toy haulers.’’ These
trailers usually have spacious rather
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
68445
than incidental living quarters and
provide a cargo area for smaller items
for personal use such as motorcycles,
mountain bikes, all terrain vehicles
(ATVs), snowmobiles, canoes or other
types of recreational gear. NHTSA
intends these vehicles to be included in
definition of ‘‘recreation vehicle trailer’’
and be subject to the requirements of
this final rule.
RVIA commented that the definition
of ‘‘travel trailer’’ inadvertently
excludes some folding camping trailers
which collapse into a low profile unit in
the travel mode. Upon reaching the
camping destination, the unit when
deployed has a ‘‘pop-up’’ roof, padded
sleeping surface extensions and canvas
side walls. Some of the smaller and less
expensive models may not have four of
the six specified facilities noted in the
proposed ‘‘travel trailer’’ definition.
RVIA suggested that these smaller
folding camping trailers would be
covered by modifying the definition of
‘‘travel trailer’’ to focus on the primary
purpose of the trailer, not simply the
presence of certain amenities alone.
Thus, the definition recommended by
RVIA would only require one of the
facilities proposed in the NPRM to be
considered a ‘‘recreation vehicle
trailer.’’
NHTSA has decided not to adopt
RVIA’s comment. The definition for
‘‘travel trailer’’ proposed in the NPRM
was fashioned after the definition of
‘‘motor home’’ at 49 CFR 571.3, and to
minimize confusion, NHTSA seeks to
keep the ‘‘facilities’’ and the number of
facilities needed to provide temporary
residential accommodations in both
definitions consistent.
In this final rule, the folding camping
trailers that are not subject to the heavy
RV CCC label requirements will have
GVWRs of 4,536 kilograms (10,000
pounds) or less and will be required to
have tire placard load carrying capacity
information required by FMVSS No.
110. NHTSA does not believe that the
folding camping trailers are significantly
contributing to the RV overloading
problem, as when the trailer is folded,
there is little room for cargo.
Finally, in this final rule, ‘‘motor
homes’’ will include all motorized RVs
such as Type A motor homes, Type B
motor homes, Type C motor homes, van
conversions, truck conversions, sportutility conversions, and other motor
vehicles that meet the definition of
‘‘motor home.’’ There were no
comments to the proposed change to the
‘‘motor home’’ definition to refer to
propane. Thus, the proposed definition
of ‘‘motor home’’ is adopted as final.
3. NPRM’s Term ‘‘Tongue Load
Rating’’ for RV Trailers—NATM
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
68446
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
commented that the term ‘‘tongue load
rating’’ used in the NPRM is not
recognized in the trailer industry, and
recommended that ‘‘measured tongue
weight’’ be used instead. NATM also
recommended that S10.2 in the
proposed regulatory text of FMVSS No.
120 be changed to ‘‘On travel trailers,
the sum of the GAWRs of all axles on
the vehicle plus the minimum
recommended tongue weight must not
be less than the GVWR.’’ NATM said
that manufacturers cannot control the
loading patterns of end-users and
therefore, most manufacturers
recommend a range of tongue weights
for their particular trailer designs.
RVIA commented that the term
‘‘tongue load rating’’ is undefined and
suggested that the term ‘‘hitch/pin load
rating’’ be used in place of ‘‘tongue load
rating’’ in the final rule.
NHTSA agrees that the term ‘‘tongue
load rating’’ may not be widely used in
the trailer industry and agrees with the
public comments. Therefore, in the final
rule, NHTSA will make the appropriate
changes to the regulatory text and will
use the terms ‘‘tongue weight’’ and/or
‘‘hitch pin load’’ rather than ‘‘tongue
load rating.’’
‘‘Tongue weight’’ means the
downward force exerted on the ball of
a hitch by the trailer coupler. In the case
of a fifth-wheel travel trailer, it is the
downward force exerted on the truck
bed by the trailer. The manufacturer
will specify the tongue weight or the
tongue weight range according to the
design of a particular trailer. Tongue
weights are typically 10 to 14 percent of
the trailer’s weight; however, the range
can vary depending on the trailer hitch
configuration and the number of axles
on the trailer. The axle ratings of the
trailer can be based on the fact that
portions of the trailer weight will be
transferred to the tow vehicle. If a range
is specified, the axles should be
designed to accommodate the worstcase scenario which would be when
tongue weight is at the minimum
portion of its range and more weight is
shifted to the axles. Consumers should
load their trailers in a fashion that keeps
the tongue weight within the range
recommended by the manufacturer.
C. GVWR, GAWR and Tire Load
Information for Motor Homes and
Recreation Vehicle Trailers
1. NPRM—In the NPRM, we proposed
to amend FMVSS No. 120 to require that
the sum of the GAWRs of all the axles
on a motor home and that the sum of the
GAWRs of all the axles on a ‘‘travel
trailer’’ plus the ‘‘tongue load rating’’
not be less than the GVWR of each
respective vehicle. We noted that the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
proposed requirement would not
prevent individual tires on motor homes
and ‘‘travel trailers’’ from being
overloaded.
In the NPRM, we also proposed to
require that the size of the tires that are
on motor homes and ‘‘travel trailers’’ at
the time of first retail sale be the same
size as the tires on the tire label required
by FMVSS No. 120. FMVSS No. 120
requires certain information on either
the Part 567 vehicle certification label or
on a separate tire information label.6
Since inflation tire pressure is critical to
tire loading, the tire label provides the
recommended tire size and cold
inflation pressure for the vehicle. If a
different tire is placed on the vehicle, it
may require a different tire inflation
pressure. Consumers may refer to the
tire label for inflation pressures. If the
size of the tire on the label and the size
of the tire on the vehicle are not the
same, the consumer may inflate the
vehicle’s tires to the wrong pressure. In
some cases, inflating vehicle tires to the
wrong pressure can intensify the effects
of overloading.
We also proposed that manufacturers
disclose the CCC of motor homes and
‘‘travel trailers.’’ NHTSA anticipated
that consumers would use this
information both to purchase vehicles
with CCCs that will meet their needs
and as guidance for how they may
subsequently load their vehicles in a
safe manner. However, we did not
propose to specify a minimum required
CCC for any motor home or travel
trailer.
2. Requirement That Heavy RVs be
Delivered to the Consumer with the
Same Size Tires That Are Listed on the
Vehicle Certification Label or Tire
Information Label—As earlier noted, in
the NPRM, NHTSA proposed to require
that RVs with GVWRs of more than
4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) have
tires at first retail sale that are the same
size as the tires listed on the vehicle
certification label or tire information
label. RMA commented that the
requirement should read: ‘‘The tires on
each motor home and travel trailer at
first retail sale must have the same or
greater tire size and load rating as the
tire size and load rating on the labeling
required by S5.3 (of FMVSS No. 120). If
the tire/wheel assemblies on the motor
home or travel trailer at first retail sale
are heavier than those listed on the
6 In FMVSS No. 120, S5.3(a) provides the option
of including tire information on the certification
label required by § 567.4 or § 567.5. In FMVSS No.
120, S5.3(b) provides the option of including the
tire information on a tire information label affixed
to the vehicle in the manner, location and form
described in 49 CFR 567.4(b) through (f). Note that
§ 567(d) applies only to trailers.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
required label, the additional weight
must be added to the unloaded vehicle
weight (UVW).’’
RVDA commented that after
consulting with many dealers and
aftermarket suppliers of RVs, it believes
a requirement that RVs with GVWRs of
more than 4,536 kg have tires at first
retail sale that are the same size as the
tires listed on the vehicle certification
label or tire information label is not a
problem in the RV industry for either
motorized RVs or travel trailers. RVDA’s
understanding is that if a customer
requests customized tires or rims on an
RV, the dealer can only install tires and
rims that are the same size as the sizes
provided on the tire information label.
Otherwise, dealers will not perform the
customization.
NHTSA notes that the proposed
requirement was not intended to
prevent dealers/service facilities from
changing the tire size and providing
customized tires with vehicles before
first retail sale. It simply states that the
size of the tires on the vehicle at first
retail sale must agree with the size of
the tires listed on the tire information
label. The dealer may replace the tires
and correct or replace the tire
information label or the vehicle
certification label to reflect the new tire
size so long as the vehicle continues to
meet all applicable requirements.
Therefore, revising the requirement
according to RMA’s suggestion would
not be necessary as it is desirable that
the tire size on the vehicle and the tire
size on the label agree.
With respect to RVDA’s comment,
NHTSA notes that the dealer/service
facility may change the tires to a
different size as long as the tire size
information on the label is corrected to
agree with the tire size on the vehicle at
the time of first retail sale and the
vehicle otherwise continues to meet all
applicable requirements. The label
assures that the consumer will always
know the size of the tires that were on
the vehicle at delivery which
presumably is a tire size recommended
by the vehicle manufacturer. If the
replacement tires weigh more than the
original tires, the additional weight will
be included in the total weight added
between final vehicle certification and
first retail sale.
Dealers/service facilities usually
correct tire sizes on FMVSS No. 110 tire
placards by either replacing or
obscuring the original tire placard with
an identical tire placard with corrected
tire sizes or obscuring a portion of the
original tire placard with an overlay that
matches the original tire placard and
allows new tire sizes to be entered. If
the new tire sizes are not machine
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
printed on the replacement tire placard
or partial overlay and there are blanks
on these labels, the new tire sizes may
be legibly entered with a black,
indelible, fine-point marker. This final
rule does not permit crossing out
incorrect values and entering new
values as a means of updating tire sizes.
The final rule requires dealers to replace
or obscure the FMVSS No. 120 tire
information label or vehicle certification
label to reflect the new tire sizes.
3. Whether the ‘‘Make Inoperative’’
Prohibition Applies to the FMVSS No.
110 Vehicle Placard and Optional Tire
Inflation Pressure Label—NHTSA
received comments from SEMA, NTEA,
NADA and ADA regarding how the
‘‘make inoperative’’ prohibition applies
to the FMVSS No. 110 tire placard after
first retail sale. The comments asked if
modifiers and repair facilities are
required to update and/or replace tire
placard/labels or whether the
requirement ends after first retail sale.
Recent NHTSA interpretations issued
to NMEDA, SEMA and Bruno on April
7, 2006, explain that it would not be a
violation of the 49 U.S.C. § 30122 ‘‘make
inoperative’’ prohibition, with respect to
S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110, if modifiers
change the vehicle’s tire size, cold
inflation pressure, and/or cargo capacity
rating after first retail sale and do not
update the tire placard.
In evaluating this question, NHTSA
focused on the language of S4.3 of
FMVSS No. 110. One of the items of
safety information required by S4.3 is
identified in paragraph (d), which reads:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
Tire size designation, indicated by the
headings ‘‘size’’ or ‘‘original tire size’’ or
‘‘original size,’’ and ‘‘spare tire’’ or ‘‘spare,’’
for the tires installed at the time of the first
purchase for purposes other than resale. For
full size spare tires, the statement ‘‘see
above’’ may, at the manufacturer’s option
replace the tire size designation. If no spare
tire is provided, the word ‘‘none’’ must
replace the tire size designation;’’ [Emphasis
added.]
The agency thus stated that the
requirement for one of the critical items
of safety information to be provided on
the tire placard is specifically expressed
in terms of the ‘‘tires installed at the
time of first purchase for purposes other
than resale.’’ NHTSA also noted that
there is a relationship between a
number of the items required to be
specified on the tire placard.
NHTSA further observed that
regardless of what changes a modifier
may make to a vehicle, it does not
change the size of the tires that were
installed at the time of the first purchase
for purposes other than resale (the
information S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110
requires to be on the placard). Given
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
this, and recognizing the relationship
between a number of the items required
to be specified on the tire placard,
NHTSA expressed its opinion that it
would not be a violation of the Section
30122 ‘‘make inoperative’’ provision,
with respect to S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110,
if modifiers change the vehicle’s tire
size, cold inflation pressure, and/or
cargo capacity rating, but do not update
the tire placard.7
Similarly, the requirement to correct
the weight value that the weight of
occupants and cargo should never
exceed on the motor home OCCC label
or the value that the weight of cargo
should never exceed on the RV trailer
CCC label ends after first retail sale.
After first retail sale, it is up to the
consumer to subtract any weight added
after first retail sale from the vehicle’s
load carrying capacity.
NHTSA notes, however, that in
accordance with 49 CFR 595.7,
businesses that modify vehicles to
accommodate people with disabilities
must provide the vehicle owner with a
document that indicates any reduction
in the load carrying capacity of a vehicle
of more than 100 kg (220 lb) after the
modifications are complete.
D. Determining Occupant Capacity
Weight
1. NPRM—In the NPRM, NHTSA
stated that in order to determine the
CCC of a motor home, the occupant
capacity weight (OCW) must be
determined. The OCW is then grouped
with the other weight factors (such as
weight of full fresh water, propane and
the unloaded vehicle weight) that must
be subtracted from the vehicle’s GVWR
in order to determine the portion of the
GVWR available for carrying cargo.
Therefore, in the NPRM, NHTSA
proposed that the greater of the total
number of safety belt-equipped seating
positions or the total number of sleeping
positions be multiplied by 68 kilograms
(150 pounds) to determine the OCW.
This OCW value would be used to
determine the weight of maximum
occupants for the motor home. NHTSA
believed that this method would capture
the worst-case OCW scenario in order to
prevent the possibility of overloading.
2. RV Occupant Capacity Weight
(OCW) and the Weight of a Standard
7 In the interpretation letter, NHTSA went on to
note that the potential inconsistency between the
information on the placard and the actual vehicle
could be ‘‘misleading and dangerous to vehicle
operators.’’ Thus, NHTSA encouraged any party
that modifies a used vehicle ‘‘so that the tire safety
information is no longer accurate to either add a
new label to the vehicle which indicates the correct
tire safety information or add a warning label * * *
indicating that the tire safety information placard is
no longer accurate.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
68447
Occupant—Seymour agreed with
NHTSA, commenting that since families
often carry a tent or tow a travel trailer
for children, basing the OCW strictly on
the number of sleeping positions does
not necessarily reflect the number of
passengers who will be traveling in the
vehicle. Seymour further commented
that the allocation of 68 kg (150 pounds)
per person in the standard is an
underestimate and will lead to
overloading.
Walker also agreed with the NHTSA
proposal, commenting that the use of
only sleeping positions to determine the
number of occupants the RV is intended
to carry undermines the entire cargo
carrying capacity calculation. The
number of occupants a motor home is
intended to carry must also be based on
the number of seats provided. Basing
the OCW calculation strictly on sleeping
positions allows manufacturers to boost
the available cargo carrying capacity
and increases the likelihood that the RV
will be operated in an overloaded
condition when seating positions are
fully occupied. Walker recommended
the practice be prohibited.
RMA commented that labeling and/or
instructions should indicate that cargo
weight could be substituted for
occupant weight if fewer than maximum
occupants are transported. Consumers
would thus get maximum use out of
their available load carrying capacity.
RMA also commented that the weight
allocation of 68 kg (150 pounds) per
occupant is low.
RVIA commented that in virtually
every case, the total safety belt-equipped
seating positions in a motor home will
be greater than the number of sleeping
positions. NHTSA’s method of
determining OCW assumes that all
safety belt-equipped seating positions
will always be occupied when
determining the vehicle’s cargo carrying
capacity. RVIA stated that while it is
certainly possible, it is unrealistic and
counter-productive to presume that this
is always the case. That organization
argued that, consequently, the consumer
will be misled by an inaccurately low
cargo carrying capacity value whenever
there are fewer passengers in the vehicle
than there are safety belt-equipped
seating positions. In its comments, RVIA
suggested alternative labels to avoid this
confusion and permit consumers to
arrive at a more accurate load carrying
capacity value for their particular
loading situation.
In response to the comments, NHTSA
notes that its proposed definition for
OCW intended to capture the maximum
OCW for a motor home, ensuring that a
vehicle with maximum occupants
would not be overloaded. NHTSA
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
68448
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
envisioned that consumers would use
the information on the label to
determine the amount of additional
cargo carrying capacity that exists when
fewer than maximum occupants are
transported. In this rulemaking, NHTSA
used an occupant weight of 68 kg (150
pounds), as it is a value currently used
throughout the FMVSS. The selection of
a new, different value would require
research.
As discussed in the section on label
content and format, in this final rule,
NHTSA adopts labels that display the
total, maximum weight allotted for
occupants and cargo. Adoption of the
abbreviated format (that displays the
total, maximum weight for occupants
plus cargo) supersedes the need to
define individually OCW or the
standard weight of an occupant. The
abbreviated format, as suggested by
RVIA, permits consumers to get
maximum use of their available load
carrying capacity as the weights of
occupants and cargo (including onboard water) are based on actual
quantities. In addition, it permits
manufacturers to state their actual load
carrying capacity for occupants and
cargo instead of understating the cargo
carrying capacity value.
E. Location of Labels
1. NPRM—To promote a consistent
label location, which may increase the
number of times consumers see the label
and thus increase label effectiveness, in
the NPRM, we proposed that the label
be affixed to the interior of the forwardmost exterior passenger door on the
right side of the vehicle and be visible.
Such a door is used repeatedly when
entering, exiting, and loading the
vehicle. In addition, such a door will
have the surface area to accommodate
the size of the required label.
2. Revised RV Load Carrying Capacity
Labels—In its comments, the RVIA
suggested a revised labeling format that
would require each RV to have
information in three locations: (1) An
abbreviated label in locations similar to
those specified for tire information
under FMVSS Nos. 110 and 120; (2) a
more detailed label that would be
placed on the inside of a prominent
cabinet door in the living quarters of the
vehicle; and (3) information in the
vehicle owner’s manual.
NHTSA agrees, in part, with the
revised format suggested by RVIA.
NHTSA believes that the most
important time for RV purchasers occurs
at the point-of-sale. Those who are not
exposed to the correct load carrying
capacity information and those who see
the load carrying capacity information
but do not understand it could follow
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
through with their purchase uninformed
of the vehicle’s load carrying capacity.
It is not until after the vehicle is
purchased and in use that overloading
issues are realized. Then, consumers
may experience unexplained control
problems, premature tire wear, tire
blowouts, rim failures, suspension
component failures, and other issues.
For these reasons, NHTSA remains in
favor of a single label requirement
providing concise information in a
prominent location on the vehicle.
Based on comments to the NPRM, in
this final rule, NHTSA will supplement
the RVIA’s suggested abbreviated label
with additional information, and will
make them the only labels required.
3. Label Locations for Heavy RVs and
All Light Vehicles—In the NPRM,
NHTSA proposed that the CCC labels be
affixed to the interior of the forwardmost exterior passenger door on the
right side of the vehicle. NHTSA stated
its belief that such a door will be
heavily used while loading cargo giving
the label maximum exposure. Also,
since such a location is not crowded
with other labels, the CCC labels would
be more recognizable and would have a
higher probability of being noticed by
the consumer during the sale of the
vehicle.
Walker commented that the CCC label
should be placed in a location similar to
the ‘‘sticker’’ label placed uniformly on
a conspicuous window on new cars.
Then a permanent label could be placed
in a prominent location elsewhere on
the vehicle. He also commented that RV
sale documents should have a required
acknowledgement referencing the
aspects of weight, overloading and addons. NHTSA notes that the location
recommended by Walker is already the
location for information required by the
Automobile Information Disclosure Act
(AIDA) (15 U.S.C. 1231–1233). Adding
the CCC label to the AIDA location
could confuse potential customers with
additional information that is not
related to AIDA requirements. Matters
involving RV sales documents are
subject to State law, and are outside the
scope of this rulemaking.
RVDA asked NHTSA to provide RV
manufacturers with reasonable
flexibility in label placement. RVDA
stated that RV floor plans for motorized
RVs and travel trailers vary widely.
Some motorized RVs do not have driverside or passenger-side front doors that
enter into the living quarters of the
vehicle. In some RVs, occupants enter
from the back and in others, occupants
enter from the front door to the cab area.
RVDA further stated that some RVs have
extensive trim packages covering the
door while others have glass doors and
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
screen doors where the labels would be
placed. RVDA said that in most
situations the label would likely be
located in the middle of the living
room/kitchen which may result in the
consumer removing it or covering it up.
RVIA had comments similar to those
from RVDA. RVIA commented that
NHTSA’s proposed requirement would
mean that most RVs would have a large,
technical, aesthetically displeasing,
stick-on label in the midst of the
owner’s living quarters. RVIA also
commented that the proposed label
location fails to take Type C and Type
B motor homes into consideration. For
instance, Type C motor homes are
typically built on a modified truck
chassis and Type B motor homes are
typically built on a full sized van
chassis. For such vehicles, the forwardmost exterior passenger door on the
right side of the vehicle is the typical
vehicle style door providing access to
the front passenger seat. RVIA stated
that given the presence of arm rests,
map compartments, beverage holders,
speakers, windows and window
controls, it may be difficult to find a
place that will accommodate the label
on the tens of thousands of Type C and
B motor homes built each year.
NHTSA believes that in order to be as
effective as possible, the label must be
seen by the consumer during the sale of
the vehicle, and that the label would be
more visible in the location specified in
the NPRM than it would be on the ‘‘B’’
pillar, on the inside of a cabinet door or
in the vehicle owner’s manual. If, due
to aesthetics, the specified location 8
results in the label looking intrusive, the
label will stand out to consumers. Since
the information on the label specified in
this final rule is more concise than that
specified in the NPRM, the label is
potentially physically smaller and
should not present as much of an
aesthetic problem as the label proposed
in the NPRM.
If there are two doors installed in the
same location, the temporary or
permanent load carrying capacity label
must be affixed to the inside of the
innermost door. For example, many RVs
have an inner screen door and outer
solid door hinged in the same location.
The doors can be used individually or
can be latched together and used as a
single door. The label must be affixed to
the inside solid portion of the inner
screen door so it will be visible at all
times. If it were placed on the inside of
the solid door, the label could be hidden
8 For the purposes of this document, ‘‘specified
location’’ means the interior of the forward-most
exterior passenger door on the right side of the
vehicle.
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
when the doors are latched together or
would be viewed through screening. On
Type B and Type C motor homes, the
temporary or permanent load carrying
capacity label will be placed on the
inside of the passenger door to the cab
of the vehicle.
Therefore, this final rule specifies the
same location as that proposed in the
NPRM (interior of the forward-most
exterior passenger door on the right side
of the vehicle). It should be noted,
however, if there are two doors installed
in the same location, the temporary or
permanent load carrying capacity label
must be affixed to the inside of the
inner-most door. For example, many
RVs have an inner screen door and outer
solid door hinged in the same location.
The doors can be used individually or
can be latched together and used as a
single door. The label must be affixed to
the inside solid portion of the inner
screen door so it will be visible at all
times. If it were placed on the inside of
the solid door, the label could be hidden
when the doors are latched together or
would be viewed through screening. On
Type B and Type C motor homes, the
temporary or permanent load carrying
capacity label will be placed on the
inside of the passenger door to the cab
of the vehicle. Also, if no doors exist on
the right side of the vehicle, the
permanent or temporary load carrying
capacity label will be placed on the
inside of the inner door on the rear of
the vehicle.
However, in order to provide
flexibility in situations where this
location may create a label that is overly
obtrusive for vehicle users, in this final
rule, NHTSA permits manufacturers the
option of placing a temporary label in
the specified location and applying an
identical permanent label in the area of
the vehicle specified by FMVSS Nos.
110 and 120 for tire information. This
approach places the information in a
prominent location during the sale of
the RV yet allows the label to be
removed by the consumer after purchase
if aesthetically displeasing. In such
cases, an identical label will remain
permanently affixed in the same area
specified for tire information.
NMMA recommended a ‘‘Plain
English’’ Guide that explains this final
rule’s labeling requirements to
manufacturers and dealers. Appendix A
of this final rule (following the final rule
regulatory text) summarizes the label
requirements for various vehicle/GVWR
combinations.
4. Location of the FMVSS No. 110
Load Carrying Capacity Modification
Label—The Alliance noted that the
NPRM provisions would require the
load carrying capacity modification
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
label to be placed within 25 mm of the
tire placard when the load carrying
capacity modification label is used to
correct load carrying capacity
information. It requested that in cases
where there is no room for the load
carrying capacity modification label
within 25 mm of the tire placard, that
the rule allow the load carrying capacity
modification label to be placed in any
location allotted for the tire placard. In
such cases, a small label near the tire
placard could refer the consumer to the
other location.
In this final rule NHTSA has clarified
that the tire placard, as well as other
sources of load carrying capacity
information may be corrected by
replacing/modifying existing labels or
adding the load carrying capacity
modification label within 25 mm of the
tire placard or original labeling. There
are many location alternatives offered
by FMVSS No. 110 at S4.3 for tire
placard placement.9 It is suggested that
a location be selected where there is
room for placement of the load carrying
capacity modification label within 25
mm if necessary.
For example, the manufacturer of a
light RV that applies a temporary OCCC
or RV trailer CCC label in the specified
location (visible on the interior of the
forward-most exterior passenger door on
the right side of the vehicle) knows that
there must be room within 25 mm of the
tire placard for two labels. One is a
permanent RV trailer or motor home
supplemental label which will be
installed by the manufacturer itself. The
other is a permanent load carrying
capacity modification label that may
have to be installed by the dealer or
service facility if the added weight
threshold is exceeded. Therefore, the
vehicle placard should be placed in an
area of the ‘‘B’’ pillar where there is
room for these labels. If the
manufacturer of the light RV is placing
a permanent OCCC or RV trailer CCC
label in the specified location, then it is
only required to assure that there is
room for a possible load carrying
capacity modification label within 25
mm of the tire placard in case it must
9 S4.3 Placard of FMVSS No. 110 states in part:
‘‘Each vehicle * * * shall show the information
specified * * * on a placard permanently affixed
to the driver’s side B-pillar. In each vehicle without
a driver’s side B-pillar and with two doors on the
driver’s side of the vehicle opening in opposite
directions, the placard shall be affixed on the
forward edge of the rear side door. If the above
locations do not permit the affixing of a placard that
is legible, visible and prominent, the placard shall
be permanently affixed to the rear edge of the
driver’s side door. If this location does not permit
the affixing of a placard that is legible, visible and
prominent, the placard shall be affixed to the
inward facing surface of the vehicle next to the
driver’s seating position. * * *’’
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
68449
be applied by the dealer or service
facility if the added weight threshold is
exceeded. If there is no room for the
dealer to apply a modification label near
the placard, then the placard must be
modified or replaced. NHTSA declines
to permit non-substantive labels that
only direct consumers to the location of
other labels.
F. Label Format and Content
1. NPRM—In the NPRM, we stated
that we seek to provide purchasers of
motor homes and travel trailers with
information about the vehicles’ CCC.
NHTSA stated its belief that the labels
should also provide consumers with a
detailed explanation of how the CCC is
calculated, thus enabling each consumer
to adjust the values according to their
particular applications. For example, if
there are only two occupants riding in
a motor home designed for six
occupants, there would be more
capacity for cargo. NHTSA proposed a
label similar to the RVIA label that is
currently voluntarily used by many
companies. Although RVIA requires its
labels on all member-manufactured RVs,
in the NPRM, NHTSA proposed labels
only for heavy RVs as it believed, at the
time, that these heavier vehicles were
more susceptible to overloading.
NHTSA also stated its belief that the
proposed label formats have information
consumers can use while comparison
shopping for motor homes or travel
trailers. The labels would also serve as
a reference to recreational vehicle
owners when the owners are loading
cargo.
NHTSA proposed that the label for
travel trailers would include the trailer
tongue load rating and the statement:
‘‘The weight of cargo should never
exceed XXX kilograms (XXX pounds)’’
in black lettering on yellow background.
The travel trailer manufacturer would
be responsible for determining the
trailer tongue load rating and the cargo
carrying capacity of its travel trailer, and
for providing this information on its
travel trailer label.
NHTSA proposed that the label for
motor homes would include the
statement: ‘‘The combined weight of
occupants and cargo should never
exceed XXX kilograms (XXX pounds)’’
in black lettering on yellow background.
This statement is the same as that
required for vehicles with GVWRs of
4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less
under the required FMVSS No. 110
vehicle placard, which became effective
on September 1, 2005. The motor home
manufacturer would be responsible for
determining the cargo carrying capacity
of its motor home, and for providing
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
68450
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
this information on its motor home
label.
All information on each of the
proposed motor home and travel trailer
labels would be required to be a
minimum print size of 2.4 millimeters
(3⁄32 inches) high and be printed on a
contrasting background. The weights on
the label would be required to be
displayed to the nearest kilogram (with
conversion to the nearest pound in
parentheses) and must reflect the
particular weight specifications of the
motor home or travel trailer to which it
is affixed as the vehicle leaves the
factory.
It was proposed that both labels
advise the purchaser that the weight of
any dealer-installed equipment must be
subtracted from the manufacturer’s
value of CCC and advise consumers to
load cargo appropriately to prevent nonuniform side-to-side and forward-aft
loading. In the case of motor homes, it
was proposed that the label contain the
weight of the maximum hitch load and
the advice that the ‘‘tongue weight’’ of
trailers or vehicles being towed also
subtracts from the manufacturer’s value
of CCC. If the motor home was not
delivered with a hitch, this block would
be left blank.
NHTSA did not propose that the label
refer to the owner’s manual, but did not
propose to prohibit manufacturers from
adding references on the label that refer
to specific information included in the
owner’s manual.
2. Revised RV Load Carrying Capacity
Labels—In its comments to the NPRM,
RVIA suggested a revised labeling
format that would require varied
information in three locations. RVIA’s
suggested format would require each RV
to have an abbreviated label, a more
detailed label and information in the
vehicle owner’s manual. Under the
RVIA revised format, an abbreviated
label would appear on each motorized
and towable RV in locations similar to
those specified for tire information
under FMVSS Nos. 110 and 120. This
abbreviated label was intended to
provide essential information in a
visible location. The abbreviated label
for motorized RVs would contain the
VIN, the maximum weight value
allotted for occupants and cargo and a
referral to the vehicle owner’s manual
for additional information. The
abbreviated label for towable RVs would
be similar to the motor home label
except that it would display the
maximum weight value allotted for
cargo only, as occupants do not
normally ride in a towed RV.
In addition, RVIA’s recommended
revised format would require more
detailed labels that would be placed on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
the inside of a prominent cabinet door
in the living quarters of the vehicle. The
more detailed labels for motor homes
and towable RVs would repeat the
information that appears on the
abbreviated labels; however, it would
also provide the definitions of GVWR,
UVW and CCC and the designated
sleeping capacity (for motor homes). In
addition, the more detailed labels would
provide advisory statements on the
effects of dealer installed equipment on
CCC and the distribution of cargo.
Also, under the revised format
suggested by RVIA, each RV would be
required to have information in the
vehicle owner’s manual. RVIA
recommended that vehicle owner’s
manuals contain the information
provided on both the abbreviated and
more detailed labels, as well as,
information about the loading of cargo,
how to weigh a vehicle, towing
guidelines and additional definitions.
The revised RVIA format also
suggested that the weight of full
propane be included in the vehicle’s
UVW weight and the weight of on-board
water be treated as cargo.
NHTSA agrees, in part, with the
revised format suggested by RVIA in its
comments. However, as stated earlier,
NHTSA favors a single label
requirement with concise information in
a prominent location on the vehicle.
The final rule specifies the minimum
information necessary to help
consumers make informed RV
purchasing decisions.
Thus, the motor home label will
include the VIN and the weight value
that the combined weight of occupants
and cargo should never exceed. To this,
in this final rule, NHTSA adds
requirements for the safety belt
equipped seating capacity (number of
safety belt equipped seating positions),
the weight of a full load of water, the
unit weight of water and an advisory
that the weight of water and towed
vehicle tongue weight is part of cargo 10.
The label for RV trailers will include
the VIN and the weight value that the
weight of cargo should never exceed. To
this, in this final rule, NHTSA adds the
weight of a full load of water, the unit
weight of water and a caution that the
weight of water is part of cargo.11
Information about on-board water
weight is important because filled water
tanks can be a significant portion of the
vehicle’s total cargo capacity. The safety
10 Throughout this document, this label will be
known as the motor home occupant and cargo
carrying capacity label or the motor home OCCC
label.
11 Throughout this document, this label will be
known as the RV trailer cargo carrying capacity
label or the RV trailer CCC label.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
belt equipped seating capacity is
provided because the combined weights
of motor home occupants is part of the
load carrying capacity equation.
These labels will follow RVIA’s
suggestions that the weight of a full load
of propane be included in the vehicle’s
UVW and the weight of on-board water
be treated as cargo. It is not easy to
determine the weight of partially filled
propane tanks and propane is usually
not off-loaded to make room for
additional cargo. Therefore, it is less
confusing to include the weight of full
propane in the UVW. The level of onboard water can be assessed by the
consumer. Campgrounds often provide
water hook-ups, making it unnecessary
to carry water. In such cases, the
absence of water provides more capacity
for cargo.
The load carrying capacity
information provided on these
abbreviated labels for RVs is also
consistent with the FMVSS No. 110 load
carrying capacity information required
on the tire placards of light vehicles.
NHTSA believes that the motor home
OCCC label and the RV trailer CCC label
specified in this final rule promotes
commonality of load carrying capacity
information between light vehicles and
heavy RVs and provides concise,
essential, non-confusing information to
consumers.
The information provided by these
labels is the information consumers
need for a quick assessment of a RV’s
load carrying capacity. Providing load
carrying capacity information in this
simple form requires that consumers
only think about the total weight of
occupants, cargo and on-board water for
motor homes and the total weight of
cargo and on-board water for RV trailers.
The definitions and other information
on the labels originally proposed in the
NPRM are not needed for a quick
assessment of load carrying capacity.
Manufacturers can provide additional
information voluntarily in the vehicle
owner’s manual. This simple format
allows consumers to easily arrive at a
more accurate load carrying capacity
value for a particular trip as the weight
of occupants and on-board water are
based on actual quantities and are not
automatically based on maximum
capacities.
NHTSA believes that by specifying
one concise, visible label it is
unnecessary to require the additional
more detailed label on the inside of a
cabinet door in the living quarters of the
vehicle or the additional information in
the vehicle owner’s manual as suggested
by RVIA. The advisory regarding dealer
installed equipment that appeared on
the CCC labels proposed in the NPRM
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
68451
however, that small increases in weight
are insignificant. Moreover, requiring
dealers to reprint labels with new
information each time a small amount of
weight is added to a vehicle is
unnecessarily burdensome.
To address these issues, in the NPRM,
NHTSA proposed that for FMVSS No.
110 vehicles, if weight equal to or less
than 0.5 percent of gross vehicle weight
rating (GVWR) is added by the dealer
before first retail sale, no additional
action is required. If weight greater than
0.5 percent of GVWR is added by the
dealer before first retail sale, the dealer
would be required to add a label to the
vehicle within 25 millimeters (1 inch) of
the FMVSS No. 110 tire placard, which
discloses the total weight of added items
to the nearest kilogram (pound). NHTSA
proposed that the label be visible when
the FMVSS No. 110 tire placard is read.
The label as proposed included blank
spaces that represent the value for total
added weight. The total added weight
would be provided by the dealer when
it installs optional accessories and
equipment in excess of 0.5 percent of
the vehicle’s GVWR. To fill out the
blank spaces, the dealer need only know
the total weight effect of added items.
NHTSA stated its belief that dealers can
provide the information without
weighing vehicles.
2. Proposal Concerning FMVSS No.
120—In the NPRM, NHTSA stated its
belief that the proposed changes to
FMVSS No. 110 concerning additional
dealer-added weight are also
appropriate for FMVSS No. 120. In the
NPRM, NHTSA proposed that the same
method proposed for FMVSS No. 110
vehicles above also be used for motor
homes and travel trailers in FMVSS No.
120. If weight equal to or less than 0.5
percent of GVWR is added by the dealer
to an FMVSS No. 120 motor home or
travel trailer between certification and
first retail sale, no additional action is
required. If weight greater than 0.5
percent of GVWR is added by the dealer
to a FMVSS No. 120 motor home or
travel trailer between certification and
first retail sale, the dealer would be
required to add the following label
within 25 millimeters (1 inch) of the
FMVSS No. 120 motor home or travel
trailer cargo carrying capacity label
which discloses the total weight of
added items to the nearest kilogram
(pound). It was proposed that the label
be visible when the FMVSS No. 120
motor home or travel trailer cargo
carrying capacity label is read.
The label as proposed included blank
spaces that represent the value for total
added weight. The total added weight
would be provided by the dealer when
it installs optional accessories and
equipment in excess of 0.5 percent of
the vehicle’s GVWR. To fill out the
blank spaces, dealers need only know
1. Proposal Concerning FMVSS No.
110—September 1, 2005 was the
effective date of an amendment to
FMVSS No. 110, Tire selection and
rims, which requires manufacturers to
affix a tire placard to the vehicle’s
driver-side B-pillar or to the edge of the
driver’s door (if no B-pillar exists)
which adds the statement: ‘‘The
combined weight of occupants and
cargo should never exceed XXX kg or
XXX lbs.’’ to the information previously
required on the existing tire placard.
Vehicle manufacturers are required to
disclose the amount of weight carrying
capacity that is available on the vehicle
for passengers and cargo. The vehicle
manufacturer installs this label when
the vehicle is certified.
Manufacturers and dealers have
inquired as to what must be done when
optional equipment and accessories are
added to a vehicle before first retail sale,
which increases the vehicle’s weight
and decreases the weight allotted for
passengers and cargo. NHTSA’s
response to such inquiries has been that
the label must be replaced as necessary
so that the vehicle has a label with
accurate information. NHTSA believes,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
ER04DE07.041
and other general requirements. Such
additional information can be provided
to consumers in ways determined by
manufacturers and organizations such
as the RVIA.
For these reasons, the labels specified
in this final rule are as follows:
ER04DE07.040
designated sleeping positions has been
made moot.
The vehicle owner’s manual
information suggested by RVIA would
also repeat information from the
abbreviated and more detailed labels,
including definitions not needed for the
load carrying capacity determination
G. Addition of Weight to FMVSS No.
110 Vehicles and to FMVSS No. 120
Motor Homes and Travel Trailers
Between Vehicle Certification and First
Retail Sale of the Vehicle
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
is addressed by the load carrying
capacity modification label required by
this final rule. Definitions are not
necessary for consumers to understand
the simple statement of occupant and
cargo limitations on the label. Also, the
need to specify the number of
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
68452
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
the total weight effect of added items.
NHTSA stated its belief that dealers can
provide the information without
weighing vehicles.
3. Comments and Decision
Concerning Weight Added to Heavy RVs
and All Light Vehicles After Final
Vehicle Certification and Before First
Retail Sale—NHTSA received
comments from numerous sources
arguing that the proposed 0.5 percent
GVWR threshold for relabeling
requirements to be triggered was too
low. Most commenters suggested that
the threshold be the lesser of 3 percent
GVWR or 100 kg (220 lb). This
suggested threshold was based on the 49
CFR 595.7 threshold afforded to those
who modify vehicles to accommodate
persons with disabilities. NMEDA
suggested that the threshold be 20
percent of the vehicle’s load carrying
capacity. RMA commented that weight
equivalent to 0.5 percent of the vehicle’s
GVWR should be added to the vehicle’s
UVW which would automatically
accommodate add-ons. NATM indicated
that trailer manufacturers understate the
load carrying capacity of trailers so
dealers would not have to worry about
optional equipment installed.
Toyota commented that the proposal
for adding the load carrying capacity
modification label to correct load
carrying capacity information when
weight is added is burdensome to
passenger vehicle manufacturers,
distributors and dealers due to the large
number of potential labels. The number
of combinations of vehicle model
weights, optional equipment and
accessories greater than the threshold is
large. The number of labels required to
accommodate all of the various
combinations of weights will be in the
thousands.
Many of the commenters asked
NHTSA to clarify the following issues:
To whom the threshold applies;
whether CCC information must be
corrected when vehicle weight is
reduced and load carrying capacity is
increased; whether the shipping weight
of added items can be used to update
load carrying capacity values; and
whether the label can still be updated or
replaced in lieu of applying the load
carrying capacity modification label.
As previously mentioned, the purpose
of the load carrying capacity
modification label and its applicability
threshold is to relieve dealers/service
facilities from having to correct load
carrying capacity information when
insignificant amounts of weight are
added to light vehicles and heavy RVs
between final vehicle certification and
first retail sale. It is also necessary to
keep the load carrying capacity
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
information reasonably accurate when
significant amounts of weight are added
to light vehicles and heavy RVs between
final vehicle certification and first retail
sale. It is anticipated that dealers/
service facilities that handle vehicles
such as RVs may have to correct the
load carrying capacity information
when equipment such as awnings,
generators, spare water tanks, and spare
fuel tanks are added between final
vehicle certification and first retail sale.
It is anticipated that dealers/service
facilities that handle vehicles such as
passenger cars will not have to correct
load carrying capacity information very
often.
In response to the many comments
arguing that the threshold value is too
low, NHTSA has reconsidered the
threshold for labels concerning
reductions in load carrying capacity. For
the following reasons, we are raising the
threshold to the lesser of 1.5 percent
GVWR or 45.4 kg (100 pounds) to
distinguish between common
transactions for trailer hitches and less
common transactions causing larger
changes in load carrying capacity.
The most commonly installed heavy
item by dealers before first retail sale is
a heavy duty Class IV trailer hitch for a
pickup truck. Such hitches have an
advertised shipping weight of less than
36.3 kg (80 lbs). A relatively small
pickup truck for this hitch application
would have a GVWR of 2721.6 kg (6000
lbs) or greater. This installation would
involve equipment representing 1.33
percent of the vehicle’s GVWR or less.
However, 5th wheel hitches which are
much heavier would still exceed the
threshold.
We believe the threshold for added
equipment weight of the lesser of 1.5
percent of GWVR or 100 pounds
relieves passenger vehicle dealers of the
responsibility for label changes in the
vast majority of equipment sales
without creating a practical safety
problem. A vehicle with the maximum
weight of added equipment of 1.5
percent of GVWR when also loaded to
the maximum weight of passengers and
cargo specified in the original label
could exceed the tire load rating by 1.5
percent as a worst case. However,
NHTSA tire research (for example,
Docket NHTSA 2000–8011 item 22)
shows that fully inflated tires are not
very sensitive to small overloads. Even
in a high speed test rigorous enough to
fail a third of the tire samples, tires that
were slightly overloaded (taking into
consideration the curvature of the test
wheel) performed comparably to a
sample of the same tire make/models
with 10 percent less load.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
NHTSA does not favor basing the
threshold on a percentage of load
carrying capacity because that does not
yield a predictable limit on the slight
overload that becomes possible, as in
the case of a threshold tied to GVWR.
Although NHTSA would prefer that the
load carrying capacity information be as
accurate as possible, there is no
requirement that prevents
manufacturers from understating the
load carrying capacity value.
Therefore, if the total combined
weight added between final vehicle
certification and first retail sale exceeds
the lesser of 1.5 percent of the vehicle’s
GVWR or 100 pounds, the load carrying
capacity information must be corrected.
This threshold applies to those who add
weight to a light vehicle or heavy RV
after the final vehicle certification and
before first retail sale.
The load carrying capacity
modification label which shows the
amount by which the load carrying
capacity is reduced is also available to
alterers of light vehicles. However, if
after the alteration, the vehicle qualifies
as a motor home or RV trailer, the
alterer is required to apply the motor
home OCCC label or RV trailer CCC
label as specified in this final rule.
Manufacturers that build heavy RVs
are required to install a motor home
OCCC label or RV trailer CCC label
which will provide accurate load
carrying capacity information for each
vehicle as it is shipped to the dealer.
The load carrying capacity modification
label/compliance threshold is then
available to dealers/service facilities
that add additional weight between final
vehicle certification and first retail sale.
When a dealer/service facility adds
weight that exceeds the lesser of 1.5
percent GVWR or 100 pounds, the load
carrying capacity information on the
motor home OCCC label or the RV
trailer CCC label and the tire placard (if
a light vehicle) must be corrected. The
dealer/service facility may accomplish
this by label replacement, label
modification, or the addition of the load
carrying capacity modification label
near the original label/tire placard.
Replacement labels must be identical
to the labels being replaced except for
the corrected values. Label modification
must be accomplished by a pre-printed
overlay which, when applied, obscures
the original values while maintaining
the original appearance of the label or
tire placard. The overlay may have
blanks where the original values were,
and corrected values may be legibly
written in the blanks of the overlay with
a black, fine-point, indelible marker.
Original labels cannot be modified
simply by crossing out incorrect values
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
68453
carrying capacity modification labels
with corrected machine printed values
could potentially better ensure legibility
than labels with handwritten corrected
values. However, we believe requiring
only machine printed (including
corrected values) load carrying capacity
modification labels would result in
unnecessary cost burdens.
Manufacturers such as Ford have
successfully used the ‘‘handwritten’’
method to allow dealers to correct
vehicle tire information when customers
request different tires before first retail
sale.
Manufacturers are not prohibited from
using load carrying capacity
modification labels with machine
printed corrected values if they choose.
Corrected motor home OCCC labels, RV
trailer CCC labels, tire placards and load
carrying capacity modification labels
must reflect the total weight added after
final vehicle certification and before
first retail sale. Correcting load carrying
capacity information is not required in
cases where vehicle weight is reduced
and load carrying capacity is increased.
Dealers/service facilities may use any
accurate method for determining the
weight of added items and
subsequently, the total amount the load
carrying capacity will be reduced. We
note that most consumer electronic
bathroom scales have ranges from 0 to
350 pounds and provide repeatable
readings within plus or minus one
percent of the actual weight. Such scales
would be suitable for weighing most
added items. The load carrying capacity
modification label specified in this final
rule is provided below:
NATM commented that the load
carrying capacity modification label
installed by dealers when additional
weight is added should identify the
dealer/service facility installing the
label for traceability.
NHTSA is not adopting a requirement
for dealer/service facility identification
on the load carrying capacity
modification label described in this
final rule. The lack of such a
requirement however does not prevent
dealers/service facilities from supplying
identifying information on load carrying
capacity modification labels or
voluntarily applying a dealer
identification label near the load
carrying capacity modification label.
Requiring dealers to provide identifying
information on load carrying capacity
modification labels would negate the
label’s generic qualities.
To summarize, in this final rule, when
the load carrying capacity is modified
between final vehicle certification and
the first retail sale, NHTSA permits the
use of generic labels where corrected
values can be legibly entered using a
black, fine point, indelible marker. This
permits dealers to stock one generic
load carrying capacity modification
label. Also, in this final rule, the
addition of the load carrying capacity
modification label is one of three
options that can be used to correct load
carrying capacity information. Dealers/
service facilities are permitted to: (1)
Replace existing tire placards, motor
home OCCC labels or RV trailer CCC
labels with new placards/labels
containing correct load carrying
capacity information; (2) modify
existing tire placards, motor home
OCCC labels or RV trailer CCC labels so
they display correct load carrying
capacity information; or (3) add a load
carrying capacity modification label
within 25 mm of the existing tire
placard and/or the motor home OCCC
label or RV trailer CCC label.
In addition, this final rule adopts a
threshold for correcting load carrying
capacity information of the lesser of 1.5
percent of GVWR or 100 pounds, greatly
decreasing the need to correct the
information.
wheel travel trailer experienced two rim
failures resulting in tire deflation,
suggested that NHTSA address common
practices for suspension component
sizing to include a safety factor built
into the design of axles, suspension
components, wheels and tires to
accommodate horizontal and vertical
dynamic loads that are higher than the
static loads normally measured.
Weston also argued that to allow for
adequate load carrying capacity,
manufacturers should be required to
add a minimum safety factor of 20 to 25
percent when sizing axles on RV
trailers. Weston stated further that
motorized and towable RVs should be
equipped with tire pressure monitoring
systems (TPMS), that manufacturers of
RVs should be required to provide
‘‘adequacy of design,’’ and that NHTSA
should consider the situation where
dealers add weight to RVs that does not
exceed the vehicle’s GVWR but still
exceeds the vehicle’s gross axle weight
rating (GAWR). In addition, Weston
commented that a government oversight
office should be formed to police the RV
industry and that upon discovery of a
problem RV manufacturers should be
required to notify customers within 48
hours.
Walker commented that drivers of
RVs over a specified weight should be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
H. Other Issues
1. Whether the Final Rule Should
Protect Against Overloading Tires,
Wheels, Axles and Suspensions on
RVs—NHTSA received numerous
comments to the NPRM which
suggested other possible actions that
may be taken in addition to or in lieu
of the proposed labeling approach.
Weston, a private citizen who during his
first long trip with a 2005, 36-foot, 5th
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
ER04DE07.042
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
on the original label/placard and writing
in new values on the original placard.
If the load carrying capacity
modification label option is used, the
modification label must be placed
within 25 mm of the original label it is
modifying. Added load carrying
capacity modification labels may be preprinted with the load carrying capacity
values blank, and the correct load
carrying capacity values may be legibly
printed on the label with a black, fine
point, indelible marker at the time it is
applied.
Because the ‘‘handwritten’’ method
has proved to be successful in the past,
we believe that permitting the
‘‘handwritten’’ method for the load
carrying capacity modification label will
provide consumers with necessary
information. Machine printed load
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
68454
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
required to have specific training and
license endorsements to demonstrate a
minimum level of knowledge. He also
argued that both the State DOT and
Federal DOT should employ spot checks
for RVs to assure that they are not over
weight or over length.
RMA commented that the NPRM does
not prevent individual tires on RVs from
being overloaded. RMA further
commented that a requirement of 10 to
25 percent tire reserve load above
GVWR would assure sufficient capacity
in the event of spot overloading and/or
poor inflation pressure maintenance.
RMA also suggested that consideration
should be given to the labeling of major
storage/cargo compartments with their
maximum load carrying capacity to
assure proper load distribution.
NHTSA recognizes that there are
numerous aspects to the problem of
potential RV overloading. Current
requirements, as well as the
requirements in this final rule do not
specifically regulate suspension
components. We believe, however, that
the labeling requirements that appear in
this final rule will improve consumer
awareness, purchase decisions and RV
loading practices. It is anticipated that
the motor home OCCC label or RV
trailer CCC label that will be provided
on each RV will encourage consumers to
purchase RVs with a load carrying
capacity adequate for their needs.
NHTSA’s Office of Defects
Investigations (ODI) continually
compiles data and responds to
complaints from consumers regarding
various RV issues. Many of these
complaints and issues are related to the
failure of RV suspension components,
individual axles, rims and tires. Many
complaints are investigated for defects
in materials and design, and all
complaints become part of a permanent
database that is used to trigger further
investigations and recalls. NHTSA’s
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance
(OVSC) enforces current NHTSA
regulations and will enforce the
requirements in this final rule when it
becomes effective. We note that actual
RV crash data specific to crashes where
an overloaded RV is a contributing
factor are rare. Statistical databases and
investigation techniques usually do not
capture overloading related attributes.
NHTSA continuously monitors all of its
databases for issues relative to vehicle
safety and takes appropriate action
when necessary.
As indicated above, Weston
commented that TPMS should be
required on all RVs. NHTSA’s TPMS
requirements are specified at FMVSS
No. 138, Tire pressure monitoring
systems and are currently being phased
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
in. Full compliance must occur on and
after September 1, 2007. Final stage
manufacturers and alterers must comply
on and after September 1, 2008. TPMS
will be required on passenger cars,
multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks
and buses with GVWRs of 4,536 kg
(10,000 pounds) or less except those
vehicles with dual wheels on an axle.
Therefore, most light, motorized RVs
will be required to have TPMS. NHTSA
does not currently plan further actions
to extend TPMS requirements to other
vehicle types or weight classes, and
notes that such action is outside the
scope of this rulemaking.
ADA commented that NHTSA fails to
address the situation where weight is
added to a vehicle by a dealer so as to
affect the GAWR but not necessarily
affect the GVWR. It said that the
situation can arise in the mobility
industry when the dealer installs an
outside scooter lift on the rear of the
vehicle. While the weight of the scooter
and lift do not cause the vehicle to
exceed its GVWR, it may cause the
GAWR of the rear axle to be exceeded.
As noted earlier, NHTSA recognizes
that there are numerous aspects to the
overloading problem. Current
requirements, as well as the
requirements in this final rule do not
specifically regulate suspension
components or the load on individual
axles, rims or tires. This final rule is
intended to inform consumers of the
load carrying capacity of the RVs that
they are purchasing so that after these
RVs are in use, consumers can avoid
overloading the RVs. We believe that
these labeling requirements will
improve consumer awareness, purchase
decisions and loading practices. Issues
concerning overloading of individual
axles, rims and tires in order to modify
vehicles for persons with disabilities is
outside the scope of this rulemaking.
Comments concerning licensing of RV
drivers and spot-checks for RVs that are
over weight/length, address matters that
are outside the scope of this rulemaking.
2. RV Weight and Weighing Issues
Weston commented that individual
RVs should actually be weighed to
verify the UVW used to design the
suspension and that compliance checks
by other than the RVIA must occur to
guarantee compliance by the industry.
Walker commented that the use of
generic floor plans to approximate RV
weights should be prohibited as there
are too many variables that may be
overlooked or manipulated. He stated
that relying on this method
compromises the entire cargo carrying
capacity calculation and may not
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
provide the consumer with fair and
equal information.
Walker also commented that if a hitch
is installed on a motor home, the weight
of the hitch, as well as the weight value
of the hitch rating should be included
in the UVW. He said that otherwise, this
important information may be
misunderstood or disregarded by
consumers.
Walker further commented that RV
manufacturers leave a variety of heavy
items off of the vehicle until the vehicle
has been weighed. He said that the addons are installed by a dealer or service
facility. Items such as roof air
conditioners, awnings, generators,
surplus fuel tanks, surplus water tanks,
microwave ovens, washer/dryers and
dishwashers are installed and not
included in the UVW or cargo carrying
capacity calculations. Regarding the
NPRM proposal that weight added by
the dealer or service facility that
exceeds 0.5 percent of GVWR be
documented on an additional label,
Walker commented that this
information will not be accurate if prior
weight information is not accurate.
Walker commented that when weight is
added at a dealer or service facility, it
should be a requirement that the vehicle
be weighed to verify if the chassis has
the capacity to handle the additional
weight.
The RVDA commented that it would
like to see NHTSA develop a consistent
set of rules on weighing procedures for
RVs.
In the NPRM, NHTSA proposed that
the weight values provided by
manufacturers be displayed to the
nearest kilogram with conversion to the
nearest pound, must be measured on
scales with a minimum accuracy of plus
or minus one percent of the actual value
and reflect the weights of the RV as
configured for delivery to the dealer/
service facility. NHTSA notes that in the
July 29, 2005 Joint Petition for
Rulemaking and Interim Relief from
FMVSS No. 110, it was stated that it was
not ‘‘financially possible’’ for all
affected manufacturers, alterers and
modifiers to have scales capable of
weighing motor vehicles. However, no
information on the extent of the
financial burden was provided,
especially if methods other than
weighing the entire vehicle were used.
The scale requirements proposed in
the NPRM were for the purpose of
ensuring that the many weight values on
the NPRM proposed label were accurate.
However, as a result of comments to the
NPRM, this final rule only requires
manufacturers to report the allowable
load carrying capacity. Therefore, in this
final rule, in place of requiring scales
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
with an accuracy of plus or minus one
percent of the actual reading, we require
the statement: ‘‘The combined weight of
occupants and cargo should never
exceed XXX kg or XXX lbs’’ on motor
homes, and the statement: ‘‘The weight
of cargo should never exceed XXX kg or
XXX lbs’’ on RV trailers. These
statements are required to state weights
that will not overload the vehicle. These
requirements allow manufacturers to
understate (but not overstate) the weight
value for load carrying capacity. This
will assure that when the consumer
loads the vehicle to the stated load
carrying capacity, the GVWR will not be
exceeded.
When the manufacturer states that the
load carrying capacity must not exceed
a certain weight value, it means that the
stated load carrying capacity weight
value plus the UVW is less than or equal
to the GVWR. The manufacturer must
consider product variability to ensure
that the load carrying capacity plus the
UVW does not exceed the GVWR. If,
after the RV leaves the manufacturing
facility and before first retail sale,
additional weight is added whose total
exceeds the threshold set by this final
rule (the lesser of 1.5 percent of GVWR
or 100 pounds), the load carrying
capacity information must be corrected
by the dealer. The total weight added by
the dealer, however, cannot exceed the
load carrying capacity weight value
initially provided by the vehicle
manufacturer.
Regarding Walker’s comments which
stated that if a hitch is installed on a
motor home, the weight of the hitch, as
well as the weight value of the hitch
rating should be included in the UVW,
NHTSA does not favor such a
requirement. If a hitch is installed by a
manufacturer on any vehicle before final
vehicle certification and delivery to the
dealer/service facility, the physical
weight of the hitch must be included in
the vehicle’s UVW value. If a hitch is
installed by a dealer/service facility on
any vehicle after final vehicle
certification, the weight of the hitch
contributes to the weight of added items
installed after final vehicle certification
and before first retail sale. When the
weight of such items exceeds the
threshold set by this final rule (the
lesser of 1.5 percent of GVWR or 100
pounds), the load carrying capacity
information is corrected by the dealer/
service facility.
If the consumer installs a hitch or has
a hitch installed after taking delivery of
the vehicle, the consumer should
subtract the physical weight of the hitch
from available load carrying capacity.
When the consumer applies tongue
weight to any hitch in the form of a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
towed vehicle or cargo carrier, the
consumer must subtract such weight
from the available load carrying
capacity. The intent of the motor home
OCCC label and the RV trailer CCC label
on the vehicle is to encourage
consumers to determine an accurate
value of load carrying capacity
according to their particular loading
situation.
NHTSA does not favor including
fictitious weight in the UVW in
anticipation that the consumer will
overload the vehicle. Therefore, a
consumer whose vehicle is equipped
with a hitch, but is not towing a vehicle
or using a hitch mounted cargo carrier,
will know that additional load carrying
capacity is available. An advisory
statement on the motor home OCCC
label informs consumers that towed
vehicle tongue weight is cargo that
counts against the total load carrying
capacity.
Regarding RVDA’s request that
NHTSA develop a consistent set of rules
or weighing procedures for RVs, NHTSA
believes that such information is best
left up to manufacturers to provide.
Other sources for weighing information
can be obtained from organizations such
as the Recreation Vehicle Safety
Education Foundation and the RVIA.
3. Numbering in Proposed FMVSS No.
110 Regulatory Text—Comments from
AIAM and the Alliance indicated that
the proposed changes to FMVSS No.
110 regulatory text in the NPRM will
eliminate the current requirement in
S4.3 (a) that relates to vehicle tire
placards. Both sought clarification
regarding the proposed amendment.
NHTSA agrees with AIAM, and the
Alliances’ comments. In this final rule
the language has been moved to separate
sections (S9 and S10) where it won’t
affect existing tire placard requirements.
4. Scope of Notice for Joint Petition
Issues—Comments from NTEA asked if
the August 31, 2005 NPRM has a broad
enough scope to encompass all of the
issues presented in the previously
submitted Joint Petition 12 that was
placed in the docket or whether the
issues will be addressed in a
supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM). NATM expressed
concern that NHTSA will not be able to
consider many of the Joint Petition’s
requested changes as the changes may
12 ‘‘Joint Petition’’ means the ‘‘Joint Petition for
Rulemaking and Interim Relief: Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 110; Vehicle
Capacity Weight and Tire Information’’ dated July
29, 2005 which was submitted to NHTSA by a
group of trade organizations through Mike Kastner
(NTEA) and Douglas Greenhaus (NADA). The
document is available in docket NHTSA–2005–
22242–3.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
68455
be out of scope of the present
rulemaking. NADA urged NHTSA to
consider whether an SNPRM should be
issued addressing the concerns
expressed in the Joint Petition in order
to provide interested parties with the
opportunity for notice and comment.
NHTSA originally drafted the cargo
carrying capacity NPRM to specifically
require load carrying capacity
information on a label for heavy RVs.
Before the NPRM was published, issues
arose regarding the load carrying
capacity information required on the
tire placard for light vehicles. According
to FMVSS No. 110 and as explained in
a subsequent interpretation, added
weight prior to first retail sale that made
the load carrying capacity information
on the tire placard inaccurate had the
effect of requiring the dealer/service
facility adding the weight to replace the
tire placard in order to correct the load
carrying capacity weight values. This
meant that the addition of even small
amounts of weight could require replacarding.
As the Joint Petition issue was related
to that NPRM, a proposed solution was
drafted and included in the heavy RV
cargo carrying capacity NPRM, which
proposed but did not require the load
carrying capacity information to be
corrected when insignificant amounts of
weight were added. This solution was
proposed for all light vehicles and all
heavy RVs.
NHTSA did not propose all of the
specific items requested by the Joint
Petition; it is, however, providing a
further response to the petition in this
document.
5. Response to Issues of the Joint
Petition—The Joint Petition that appears
in docket NHTSA–2005–22242–3 raised
five basic issues.
The Joint Petition argued that the load
carrying capacity statement required by
FMVSS No. 110 should allow for a
reasonable tolerance in the calculation
of the load carrying capacity or not
require action unless load carrying
capacity is reduced by at least 100 kg
(220 pounds). This final rule addresses
this issue by adopting a threshold of the
lesser of 1.5 percent of GVWR or 100
pounds. While this is lower than the
amount requested in the Joint Petition,
we believe it addresses the concerns
raised in the petition.
Also, in the NPRM we proposed that
the unloaded vehicle weight for heavy
RVs be determined with scales that have
a minimum accuracy of plus or minus
one percent of the actual reading.
Since, in this final rule, the label
format has changed and manufacturers
will only be reporting the weight
allotted for passengers and cargo or
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
68456
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
simply cargo in the case of RV trailers,
we are requiring that the stated load
carrying capacity not overload the
vehicle. The GVWR of the vehicle must
not be exceeded when the vehicle is
loaded with the stated load carrying
capacity. Manufacturers are permitted to
understate the value of load carrying
capacity to compensate for variances in
manufacturing techniques, materials,
and weighing techniques, however,
under no circumstances is an overstated
value of load carrying capacity
permitted. Any inaccuracies due to
scale tolerances and variances in
manufacturing techniques or materials
must be compensated for by
appropriately increasing the safety
factor between the allotted weight for
occupants and cargo (or just cargo in the
case of RV trailers) and the GVWR.
Accordingly, the probability of moisture
absorption by wooden structures before
first retail sale should be considered in
assigning the load carrying capacity.
The Joint Petition also requested that
the weight value listed on the original
tire placard be labeled as ‘‘estimated.’’
This request is denied because the load
carrying capacity is not merely an
estimate. The manufacturer must
determine that the vehicle will not
exceed GVWR when carrying the ‘‘load
carrying capacity’’ weight. This final
rule requires an accurate determination
of load carrying capacity.
As an alternative to the first two
issues, the Joint Petition requested that
the load carrying capacity be labeled as
‘‘originally manufactured.’’ This request
is denied because it is not an accurate
statement to a purchaser of the vehicle’s
load carrying capacity. However, the
final rule does address basic concerns in
the context of the first issue of the Joint
Petition, regarding a reporting threshold
for added weight. Thus, the labeled load
carrying capacity reflects both the
vehicle as originally manufactured and
any reduction in load carrying capacity
that occurs beyond a given threshold
before the first retail sale. Also, in an
interpretation written to John Russell
Deane III, Esq. on April 7, 2005, NHTSA
stated that regulations do not require
changes to the tire safety information
placard if the changes to the vehicle
occur after it is first sold for purposes
other than retail sale.
The Joint Petition also asked for
clarification of whether placards/labels
may still be modified in lieu of being
replaced. This issue is addressed in this
final rule. There are three methods
available to dealers/service facilities for
updating load capacity information:
1. Replacement of original placard/
label with a new placard/label with
updated information.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
2. Modification of original placard/
label in order to update information.
This must be accomplished with an
overlay that maintains the original
appearance of the placard/label. The
overlay may have blanks where the
updated weight values may be legibly
printed by hand with a fine point
indelible marker.
3. Addition of the Load Carrying
Capacity Modification Label within 25
mm of the placard/label being corrected
which indicates the amount the load
carrying capacity is reduced. The load
carrying capacity modification labels
may have blank spaces where the value
of load carrying capacity reduction may
be legibly printed by hand with a fine
point indelible marker.
Finally, the Joint Petition asked if any
revised cargo capacity weight may be
calculated by subtracting total added
weight from the stated load capacity
weight on the existing tire placard or
label. It also asked if the total added
weight may be determined by using the
supplier’s stated shipping weight of the
equipment, or its weight as determined
by commercially reasonable scales. This
issue is addressed in this final rule.
Dealers/service facilities may determine
total added weight by using any means
that result in accurate weights. It is up
to the dealers/service facilities to decide
how to achieve accurate weights. Since
the vehicle manufacturer has certified
the vehicle with the stated load capacity
weight on the existing tire placard or
label as long as the dealers/service
facilities have reason to believe the
stated weights on the placard or label,
it is reasonable for dealers/service
facilities to rely on this so long as they
have reason to believe the stated
weights on the placard or label have not
changed.
If the total added weight exceeds the
lesser of 1.5 percent GVWR or 100
pounds, the load carrying capacity
information must be corrected on the
tire placards and RV load carrying
capacity labels.
6. The Meaning of ‘‘Stated Weight
Ratings’’ in FMVSS No. 110
In a November 30, 2005 request for
interpretation submitted by all of the
Joint Petitioners except the National
Trailer Dealers Association, NHTSA was
asked to address a series of questions
about the Tire Safety Information Rule
of November 18, 2002 (67 FR 69600).
One question was whether the term
‘‘stated weight ratings’’ used in 49 CFR
Sections 567.3, 567.6, and 567.7 refers
to a vehicle’s gross vehicle weight rating
as defined in 49 CFR Section 571.3. In
a January 22, 2007 interpretation letter
responding to that request, NHTSA
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
noted that ‘‘stated weight rating’’ is used
in both 49 CFR Part 567 and in FMVSS
No. 110. We stated that: ‘‘In responding
to the petitions for rulemaking, we will
address the meaning of this term in Part
567 and FMVSS No. 110, and the
interrelationship between these
provisions.’’
We note that in a final rule of
February 14, 2005 (70 FR 7414), Part
567 was reissued. The changes took
effect on September 1, 2006. The term
‘‘stated weight ratings’’ in Part 567
(particularly in the definition of ‘‘altered
vehicle’’ at Section 567.3) refer to a
vehicle’s stated weight ratings, in other
words, the Gross Axle Weight Rating
(GAWR) and Gross Vehicle Weight
Rating (GVWR). The use of the term
‘‘vehicle’s stated weight ratings’’ is longstanding in Part 567, and was used in
Part 567 before the final rule of
February, 2005. See also Section 567.7,
Requirements for persons who alter
certified vehicles.
The November 18, 2002 Tire Safety
Information Final Rule amending
FMVSS No.110 added S4.3.2.
Requirements for altered vehicles. This
paragraph incorporated language from
the then-existing version of Section
567.7 Requirements for persons who
alter certified vehicles, including the
term ‘‘stated weight ratings.’’
As explained in the preamble, that
final rule required alterers, where
necessary, to affix a new placard,
containing accurate information for the
altered vehicle, over the placard
installed by the vehicle manufacturer,
so as to obscure the original placard. See
67 FR at 69618.
The language of S4.3.2 indicates that
it applies to alterers.13 Not all persons
who make changes to certified vehicles
prior to first sale are considered alterers.
(If someone is an alterer, they have
certification responsibilities under Part
567.) The question of whether someone
is an alterer is determined under Part
567.
We note, however, that regardless of
whether a person (such as a dealer)
making changes to a vehicle prior to
first sale is considered an alterer, they
are subject to other legal requirements.
Under 49 U.S.C. 30112, a dealer may not
sell vehicles or equipment that do not
comply with applicable safety
standards. Also, 49 U.S.C. 30122
prohibits dealers, manufacturers, and
certain other entities from ‘‘making
inoperative, in whole or in part’’ any
part of a device or element of design
installed on or in a motor vehicle in
compliance with an applicable motor
13 Compare the language of S4.3.2 with the
definition of ‘‘alterer’’ in Part 567.
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
vehicle safety standard. Accordingly, a
dealer would need to correct the tire
information placard if, after the dealer
installs additional equipment, the
required information is no longer
accurate.
As discussed earlier, in this final rule,
NHTSA is providing regulatory relief
related both to the circumstances under
which re-labeling is required and the
means by which it is done. The new/
revised requirements are in FMVSS No.
110, at S10 Weight added to vehicles
between final vehicle certification and
first retail sale of the vehicle. This
section is not limited to alterers, i.e., it
applies regardless of whether the person
adding the weight is considered an
alterer.
We are not removing the language of
S4.3.2 since it has broader applicability
than situations where weight is added.
We note, however, that if the addition
of weight is the only relevant issue and
the situation is addressed by the
provisions of S10, alterers need not
separately meet 4.3.2. To make this
clear, we are adding the phrase ‘‘Except
as provided in S10,’’ at the beginning of
S4.3.2.
7. Issues Outside the Scope of
Rulemaking—The purpose of this
rulemaking is to provide load carrying
capacity information to purchasers of
RVs. It also is intended to provide an
alternate means to correct load carrying
capacity information on all light
vehicles and heavy RVs when weight
exceeding the lesser of 1.5 percent of
GVWR or 100 pounds is added between
final vehicle certification and first retail
sale. We note that some NPRM
comments re-raise old issues related to
previous tire placarding rulemakings
that are outside the scope of this
rulemaking and are not addressed in
this final rule.
Additionally, it should be noted that
the load carrying capacity labels
required by this final rule are intended
to inform consumers of the RV’s load
carrying capacity they are about to
purchase and to remind them of the
RV’s load carrying capacity after
purchase and during use. Although
knowledge of the RV’s load carrying
capacity may prevent consumers from
exceeding the RV’s GVWR, it does not
prevent consumers from distributing
loads in a fashion that would cause
individual tires or components from
being overloaded. As various makes/
models of RVs each have its own
characteristics, it is difficult for
consumers to know the correct weight
distribution without weighing the
loaded vehicle at each individual tire.
Manufacturers are urged to provide
consumers with as much guidance as
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
possible in the vehicle owner’s manual
relative to the proper distribution of
cargo loads.
V. Final Rule
In this final rule, NHTSA amends 49
CFR 571.3 (Definitions), FMVSS No.
110, and FMVSS No. 120 as described
above. We require manufacturers of all
motor homes and recreation vehicle
(RV) trailers to provide information to
consumers in a label that informs the
consumer about the vehicle’s load
carrying capacity. The final rule defines
‘‘recreation vehicle trailer,’’ and adds
new language that would include
weights for water and propane tanks for
motor homes and recreation vehicle
(RV) trailers. We also require that the
size of tires on motor homes and RV
trailers be the same as the size of tires
listed on the vehicle certification label
or tire information label.
For motor homes, we adopt labels that
display the VIN, the weight allotted for
occupants and cargo, the weight of a full
load of water, the unit weight of water
and cautionary statements that the
weight of water is part of cargo and the
tongue weight of a towed trailer counts
as cargo. In addition, for motor homes,
NHTSA requires that the safety belt
equipped seating capacity be included
on the label.
For RV trailers, we adopt labels that
display the VIN, the weight allotted for
cargo, the weight of a full load of water,
the unit weight of water and a
cautionary statement that the weight of
water is part of cargo.
To promote a consistent label
location, this final rule specifies that
cargo carrying capacity labels be affixed
to the interior of the forward-most
exterior passenger door on the right side
of the vehicle and be visible. As an
alternative (due to aesthetic
considerations) NHTSA permits
manufacturers to place a temporary
label to the interior of the forward-most
exterior passenger door on the right side
of the vehicle and apply a permanent
label in the area of the vehicle specified
by FMVSS Nos. 110 and 120 for tire
information.
In addition, this final rule adopts a
threshold for correcting load carrying
capacity information of the lesser of 1.5
percent of GVWR or 100 pounds, greatly
decreasing the need to correct the
information. When the load carrying
capacity is increased beyond the lesser
of 1.5 percent of GVWR or 100 pounds,
between final vehicle certification and
the first retail sale, NHTSA permits the
use of generic labels where corrected
values can be legibly entered using a
black, fine point, indelible marker. This
permits dealers to stock one generic
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
68457
load carrying capacity modification
label.
In this final rule, the addition of the
load carrying capacity modification
label is one of three options that can be
used to correct load carrying capacity
information. Dealers/service facilities
are permitted to: (1) Replace existing
tire placards, motor home OCCC labels
or RV trailer CCC labels with new
placards/labels containing correct load
carrying capacity information; (2)
modify existing tire placards, motor
home OCCC labels or RV trailer CCC
labels so they display correct load
carrying capacity information; or (3) add
a load carrying capacity modification
label within 25 mm of existing tire
placard and/or the motor home OCCC
label or RV trailer CCC label.
VI. Leadtime
Since we had no public comment on
the leadtime issue, the amendments in
this final rule take effect, as proposed,
180 days (approximately six months)
after the final rule is published. We note
that the new labeling requirements in
this final rule do not require
manufacturers to collect or provide any
information other than that already
voluntarily provided by motor home
and travel trailer manufacturers that are
members of the Recreational Vehicle
Industry Association.
The provisions in this final rule
amending FMVSS No. 110 were made to
provide regulatory relief to dealers that
may add weight no more than 1.5
percent of gross vehicle weight rating
(or 100 pounds if less) after certification
of vehicles and before first retail sale of
the vehicles. Thus, optional compliance
with this final rule is available as of the
date this final rule is published in the
Federal Register.
VII. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993), provides for making
determinations whether a regulatory
action is ‘‘significant’’ and therefore
subject to Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) review and to the
requirements of the Executive Order.
The Order defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as one that is likely
to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
68458
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
We have considered the impact of this
rulemaking action under Executive
Order 12866 and the Department of
Transportation’s regulatory policies and
procedures. This rulemaking document
was not reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget under E.O.
12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review.’’ The rulemaking action is also
not considered to be significant under
the Department’s Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979).
For the following reasons, we believe
that this final rule will not have any
quantifiable cost effect on
manufacturers of motor homes or RV
trailers. As discussed earlier, the
labeling requirements in this rule
parallel the labels already required by
the Recreational Vehicle Industry
Association (RVIA) for RIVA members.
Approximately 95 percent of affected
motor home and travel trailer
manufacturers are RVIA members. Thus,
the final rule will have new labeling
requirements on only approximately 5
percent of recreational vehicle
manufacturers. The RV labels specified
in this final rule are simpler, less
complex versions of the labels proposed
in the NPRM.
In addition, this provides regulatory
relief for dealers from an existing
labeling requirement in the safety
standard on tire selection and rims.
Dealers that add items to covered
vehicles exceeding the lesser of 100
pounds or 1.5 percent of the vehicles’
gross vehicle weight ratings, will be
required to disclose this extra weight on
labels affixed to the vehicles. No labels
are required for the addition of weight
that does not exceed the lesser of 1.5
percent of the vehicle’s gross vehicle
weight rating or 100 pounds.
In its NPRM comments, Toyota stated
that NHTSA has not provided a cost
benefit analysis regarding load carrying
capacity modification labels. NTEA
commented that scales are too
expensive for every dealership and final
stage manufacturer to own.
For light vehicles, the requirements
for the tire placard and the load carrying
capacity information on the tire placard
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
were established by previous FMVSS
No. 110 rulemakings. The load carrying
capacity modification label proposed in
the August 15, 2005 NPRM was not
meant to be a new requirement, but an
option that may be used in lieu of
replacing or modifying the original tire
placard as required by FMVSS No. 110.
This option was adopted in this final
rule. Dealers/service facilities can
choose to replace or modify the tire
placard rather than apply the load
carrying capacity modification label.
For motor home OCCC labels and RV
trailer CCC labels required on RVs,
members of the RVIA, which include 95
percent of the RV industry, have
displayed cargo carrying capacity
information voluntarily for years. This
final rule standardizes and makes such
information mandatory, and mandates
its placement in a prominent location.
Also, NHTSA has adopted the RVIA
suggestion that the load carrying
capacity labeling requirements in the
NPRM be extended to all RVs.
As previously stated, dealers/service
facilities can use any accurate method
for determining the weight of added
items. We note that if a dealer/service
facility chooses to use a scale, most
consumer electronic bathroom scales
provide readings from 0 to 350 pounds
and can provide repeatable readings
within plus or minus one percent of the
actual weight. Bathroom scales are
inexpensive and would be suitable for
weighing smaller items. Dealer/service
facilities can also purchase larger
commercial scales to weigh larger items,
if necessary.
Because the economic impacts of this
proposal are so minimal, no separate
regulatory evaluation is necessary.
B. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
NHTSA has examined today’s final
rule pursuant to Executive Order 13132
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and
concluded that no additional
consultation with States, local
governments, or their representatives is
mandated beyond the rulemaking
process. The agency has concluded that
the rule does not have federalism
implications, because the rule does not
have ‘‘substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and the
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’
Further, no consultation is needed to
discuss the preemptive effect of today’s
rule. NHTSA rules can have preemptive
effect in at least two ways. First, the
National Traffic and Motor Vehicle
Safety Act contains an express
preemptive provision: ‘‘When a motor
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
vehicle safety standard is in effect under
this chapter, a State or a political
subdivision of a State may prescribe or
continue in effect a standard applicable
to the same aspect of performance of a
motor vehicle or motor vehicle
equipment only if the standard is
identical to the standard prescribed
under this chapter.’’ 49 U.S.C.
30102(b)(1).
In addition to the express preemption
noted above, the Supreme Court has
also recognized that State requirements
imposed on motor vehicle
manufacturers, including sanctions
imposed by State tort law, can stand as
an obstacle to the accomplishment and
execution of a NHTSA safety standard.
When such a conflict is discerned, the
Supremacy Clause of the Constitution
makes their State requirements
unenforceable. See Geier v. American
Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000).
NHTSA has not outlined such potential
State requirements in today’s
rulemaking, however, in part because
such conflicts can arise in varied
contexts, but it is conceivable that such
a conflict may become clear through
subsequent experience with changes
made in today’s final rule. NHTSA may
opine on such conflicts in the future, if
warranted. See id. at 883–86.
C. Executive Order 13045 (Economically
Significant Rules Affecting Children)
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) applies to any rule that:
(1) Is determined to be ‘‘economically
significant’’ as defined under E.O.
12866, and (2) concerns an
environmental, health or safety risk that
NHTSA has reason to believe may have
a disproportionate effect on children. If
the regulatory action meets both criteria,
we must evaluate the environmental
health or safety effects of the planned
rule on children, and explain why the
planned regulation is preferable to other
potentially effective and reasonably
feasible alternatives considered by us.
This rule is not subject to the
Executive Order because it is not
economically significant as defined in
E.O. 12866 and does not involve
decisions based on environmental,
health or safety risks that
disproportionately affect children. This
final rule makes changes affecting motor
home manufacturers and travel trailer
manufacturers. It has a beneficial impact
on children traveling in motor homes
and recreation vehicle trailers because
the new labeling requirements in this
final rule provides information to help
their parents or guardians keep from
overloading the vehicles.
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
D. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
With respect to the review of the
promulgation of a new regulation,
section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988,
‘‘Civil Justice Reform’’ (61 FR 4729,
February 7, 1996) requires that
Executive agencies make every
reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the
preemptive effect; (2) clearly specifies
the effect on existing Federal law or
regulation; (3) provides a clear legal
standard for affected conduct, while
promoting simplification and burden
reduction; (4) clearly specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any
guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. This document is consistent
with that requirement. Pursuant to this
Order, NHTSA notes as follows. The
preemptive effect of this rule is
discussed above. NHTSA notes further
that there is no requirement that
individuals submit a petition for
reconsideration or pursue other
administrative proceeding before they
may file suit in court.
Business Administration’s regulations at
13 CFR 121.201 defines a small ‘‘motor
home manufacturer’’ (NAICS Code
336213) as a ‘‘business entity organized
for profit, with a place of business
located in the United States, and which
operates primarily within the United
States or which makes a significant
contribution to the U.S. economy
through payment of taxes or use of
American products, materials or labor.’’
(See 13 CFR 121.105) that employs
fewer than 1,000 employees. RV trailer
and camper manufacturers (NAICS Code
336214) on the other hand, have a size
standard of fewer than 500 employees.
NHTSA believes that most RVIA
members are small businesses. As
earlier discussed, 95 percent of RVIA
members are already providing to their
customers labeling information that
parallel the information specified in this
NPRM. The RV labels specified in this
final rule are simpler versions of the
labels proposed in the NPRM.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
F. National Environmental Policy Act
We have analyzed this final rule for
the purposes of the National
Environmental Policy Act and
determined that it would not have any
significant impact on the quality of the
human environment.
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of
1996) whenever an agency is required to
publish a notice of rulemaking for any
proposed or final rule, it must prepare
and make available for public comment
a regulatory flexibility analysis that
describes the effect of the rule on small
entities (i.e., small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions). However, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required if the
head of an agency certifies the rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. SBREFA amended the
Regulatory Flexibility Act to require
Federal agencies to provide a statement
of the factual basis for certifying that a
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
The Administrator considered the
effects of this rulemaking action under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.) and certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for this
certification is that this final rule
minimally affects small U.S. motor
home manufacturers or small U.S. travel
trailer manufacturers. The U.S. Small
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
by a Federal agency unless the
collection displays a valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) control
number. This final rule introduces new
information collection requirements in
that the new regulation requires certain
disclosures to third parties. Information
collection under this final rule consists
of a load carrying capacity label applied
to all motor homes and recreation
vehicle (RV) trailers. If the original
information is changed, this information
collection also requires a load carrying
capacity modification label to correct
the original load carrying capacity
information on all RVs and light
vehicles when significant additional
weight is added between final vehicle
certification and first retail sale.
If the total weight added by dealers/
service facilities between final vehicle
certification and first retail sale exceeds
the lesser of 1.5 percent of GVWR or 100
pounds, the original load carrying
capacity information must be corrected.
Corrections can be made via the load
carrying capacity modification label
described in this final rule or by
provisions in a previous rulemaking
which allows original labels to be
corrected by modification or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
68459
replacement. Our estimates of the
burden that this rulemaking imparts on
all motor home and RV trailer
manufacturers and manufacturers of
light vehicles other than motor homes
are given below. There is no burden to
non-manufacturers or non-dealers.
RV estimates are based on the fact that
approximately 95 percent of all RV
manufacturers currently belong to RVIA
and already voluntarily apply load
carrying capacity labels to the vehicles
they produce. When this rulemaking
becomes a final rule, these 95 percent of
RVs will replace the current voluntary
label with the NHTSA label at no
additional cost. Therefore, any
additional cost for information
collection imparted by this final rule is
a result of the remaining 5 percent of RV
manufacturers to apply load carrying
capacity labels and the cost to RV
dealers/service facilities that choose to
apply the load carrying capacity
modification label. The cost to
manufacturers of light vehicles other
than RVs is minimal as most vehicles
will not exceed the added-weight
threshold and dealers/service facilities
will not be required update load
carrying capacity information. The
additional cost for information
collection to light vehicle manufacturers
other than RV manufacturers results
from those who choose to correct load
carrying capacity information by
applying the load carrying capacity
modification label. The label is not
mandatory; it is simply an alternative to
correcting load carrying capacity
information by replacing or updating
the original tire placard/label when the
weight threshold is exceeded.
The following are the cost and hour
burden estimates resulting from the CCC
information requirements in this final
rule. Numbers are based on 2005
estimates.
RV manufacturers and manufacturers
of light vehicles other than RVs already
have the following knowledge,
information and resources and therefore
these items will not impose any
additional costs and/or burden hours.
• Vehicle gross vehicle weight rating
(GVWR).
• Means to print or procure labels.
• Scale system for weighing vehicles.
Estimated annual burden hours on the
5 percent of RV manufacturers that
are not RVIA members to weigh an
RV in order to determine unloaded
vehicle weight (UVW)
Estimated burden hours to weigh an
RV = .16 hours/RV
Approximately 419,500 RVs shipped
in 2005
It is estimated that 5 percent or 20,975
RVs/year currently do not voluntarily
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
68460
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
display CCC information as their
manufacturers are not members of
RVIA.
20,975 RVs/year × 0.16 hours/RV =
3,356 hours/year
Estimated annual cost to the 5 percent
of RV manufacturers that are not
RVIA members to procure or
produce motor home OCCC labels
and RV trailer CCC labels
Estimated cost to produce labels =
$0.15/ RV
Approximately 419,500 RVs shipped
in 2005
It is estimated that 5 percent or 20,975
RVs/year currently do not voluntarily
display CCC information as their
manufacturers are not members of
RVIA.
20,975 RVs/year × $ 0.15/RV =
$3,146/year
Estimated annual burden hours on the
5 percent of RV manufacturers that
are not RVIA members to install
motor home OCCC labels and RV
trailer CCC labels
Estimated burden hours to install
labels = 0.02 hours/RV
Approximately 419,500 RVs shipped
in 2005
It is estimated that 5 percent or 20,975
RVs/year currently do not voluntarily
display CCC information as their
manufacturers are not members of
RVIA.
20,975 RVs/year × 0.02 hours/RV =
420 hours/year
Estimated annual cost to RV
manufacturers to procure or
produce the load carrying capacity
modification labels when necessary
Estimated cost to procure or produce
labels = $0.05/RV
Approximately 419,500 RVs shipped
in 2005
An estimated 25 percent or 104,875
RVs/year will receive the CCC
modification label.
104,875 RVs/year × $0.05/RV =
$5,245/year
Estimated annual burden hours on RV
manufacturers to install the load
carrying capacity modification
labels when necessary
Estimated burden hours to install
labels = 0.02 hours/RV
Approximately 419,500 RVs shipped
in 2005
An estimated 25 percent or 104,875
RVs/year will receive the CCC
modification label.
104,875 RVs/year × 0.02 hours/RV =
2,098 hours/year
Estimated annual cost to light vehicle
manufacturers to procure or
produce the load carrying capacity
modification labels when necessary
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
Estimated cost to procure or produce
labels = $0.05/light vehicle
Approximately 17,000,000 light
vehicles shipped in 2005
An estimated 1 percent or 170,000
light vehicles/year will receive the CCC
modification label.
170,000 light vehicles/year × $0.05/
light vehicle = $8,500/year
Estimated annual burden hours on light
vehicle manufacturers to insert
values and install the load carrying
capacity modification labels when
necessary/desired
Estimated burden hours to install
labels = 0.02 hours/light vehicle
Approximately 17,000,000 light
vehicles shipped in 2005
An estimated 1 percent or 170,000
light vehicles/year will receive the CCC
modification label.
170,000 light vehicles/year × 0.02
hours/light vehicle = 3,400 hours/
year
Total estimated burden hours and cost
9274 hours/year
$16,891/year
H. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104–
113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272)
directs us to use voluntary consensus
standards in our regulatory activities
unless doing so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards
bodies, such as the Society of
Automotive Engineers (SAE). The
NTTAA directs us to provide Congress,
through OMB, explanations when we
decide not to use available and
applicable voluntary consensus
standards.
After conducting a search of available
sources, we have decided to specify
labels similar to those used by the
Recreational Vehicle Industry
Association, advising consumers of
cargo carrying capacity for motor homes
and travel trailers, and providing
advisories.
I. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule will not impose any
unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995. This rule will not result in costs
of $100 million or more to either State,
local, or tribal governments, in the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
aggregate, or to the private sector. Thus,
this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
the UMRA.
J. Plain Language
Executive Order 12866 requires each
agency to write all rules in plain
language. Application of the principles
of plain language includes consideration
of the following questions:
—Have we organized the material to suit
the public’s needs?
—Are the requirements in the rule
clearly stated?
—Does the rule contain technical
language or jargon that is not clear?
—Would a different format (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing) make the rule easier to
understand?
—Would more (but shorter) sections be
better?
—Could we improve clarity by adding
tables, lists, or diagrams?
—What else could we do to make this
rulemaking easier to understand?
In response to public comments on
the NPRM, in this final rule, NHTSA
includes an Appendix A that
summarizes the label requirements for
various vehicle/GVWR combinations.
The scenarios assume use of the load
carrying capacity modification label
when load carrying capacity
information is corrected. This
explanation is offered as a Plain
Language guide to the various labels and
figure numbers. An explanation of the
labels applicable to each vehicle type
(i.e., light vehicles other than RVs, light
RVs, and heavy RVs) is set forth in the
appendix.
K. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
The Department of Transportation
assigns a regulation identifier number
(RIN) to each regulatory action listed in
the Unified Agenda of Federal
Regulations. The Regulatory Information
Service Center publishes the Unified
Agenda in April and October of each
year. You may use the RIN contained in
the heading at the beginning of this
document to find this action in the
Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 571
Imports, Motor vehicle safety, Motor
vehicles, Rubber and rubber products,
Tires.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
(49 CFR Part 571), are amended as set
forth below.
I
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
§ 571.110 Tire selection and rims and
motor home/recreation vehicle trailer load
carrying capacity information for motor
vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 kilograms
(10,000 pounds) or less.
PART 571—FEDERAL MOTOR
VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS
1. The authority citation for part 571
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115,
30117, and 30166; delegation of authority at
49 CFR 1.50.
2. Section 571.3 of title 49, Code of
Federal Regulations, is amended by
revising the definition of ‘‘motor home’’
and adding a definition of ‘‘recreation
vehicle trailer,’’ in the appropriate
alphabetical order, to read as follows:
I
§ 571.3
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Motor home means a multi-purpose
vehicle with motive power that is
designed to provide temporary
residential accommodations, as
evidenced by the presence of at least
four of the following facilities: cooking;
refrigeration or ice box; self-contained
toilet; heating and/or air conditioning; a
potable water supply system including
a faucet and a sink; and a separate 110–
125 volt electrical power supply and/or
propane.
*
*
*
*
*
Recreation vehicle trailer means a
trailer, except a trailer designed
primarily to transport cargo, designed to
be drawn by a vehicle with motive
power by means of a bumper, frame or
fifth wheel hitch and designed to
provide temporary residential
accommodations, as evidenced by the
presence of at least four of the following
facilities: cooking; refrigeration or ice
box; self-contained toilet; heating and/or
air conditioning; a potable water supply
system including a faucet and a sink;
and a separate 110–125 volt electrical
power supply and/or propane.
‘‘Recreation vehicle trailer’’ includes
trailers used for personal purposes,
commonly known as ‘‘sport utility RVs’’
or ‘‘toy haulers,’’ which usually have
spacious rather than incidental living
quarters and provide a cargo area for
smaller items for personal use such as
motorcycles, mountain bikes, all terrain
vehicles (ATVs), snowmobiles, canoes
or other types of recreational gear.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 571.110 of title 49, Code of
Federal Regulations, is amended by:
revising the section heading; by revising
S1; by adding to the introductory
paragraph of S4.3, ninth and tenth
sentences; by revising S4.3.2; by adding
to S4.3.5, fifth and sixth sentences; by
adding S9 through S9.3.8; and by
adding S10 through S10.2 to read as as
follows:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
S1. Purpose and scope. This standard
specifies requirements for tire selection
to prevent tire overloading and for
motor home/recreation vehicle trailer
load carrying capacity information.
*
*
*
*
*
S4.3 Placard. * * * If the vehicle is
a motor home and is equipped with a
propane supply, the weight of full
propane tanks must be included in the
vehicle’s unloaded vehicle weight. If the
vehicle is a motor home and is equipped
with an on-board potable water supply,
the weight of such on-board water must
be treated as cargo.
*
*
*
*
*
S4.3.2 Requirements for altered
vehicles. Except as provided in S10, a
new placard or placard and label shall
be affixed, so as to obscure the original
placard, to an altered vehicle that has
previously been certified in accordance
with § 567.4 or § 567.5, other than by
the addition, substitution, or removal of
readily attachable components such as
mirrors or tire and rim assemblies, or
minor finishing operations such as
painting, or who alters the vehicle in
such a manner that its stated weight
ratings are no longer valid, before the
first purchase of the vehicle in good
faith for purposes other than resale,
containing accurate information for the
altered vehicle, in accordance with S4.3.
*
*
*
*
*
S4.3.5 Requirements for trailers. * *
* If the vehicle is a recreation vehicle
trailer and is equipped with a propane
supply, the weight of full propane tanks
must be included in the vehicle’s
unloaded vehicle weight. If the vehicle
is a recreation vehicle trailer and is
equipped with an on-board potable
water supply, the weight of such onboard water must be treated as cargo.
*
*
*
*
*
S9. Each motor home and recreation
vehicle (RV) trailer must meet the
applicable requirements in S9.
S9.1 On motor homes, the sum of
the gross axle weight ratings (GAWR) of
all axles on the vehicle must not be less
than the gross vehicle weight rating
(GVWR).
S9.2 On RV trailers, the sum of the
GAWRs of all axles on the vehicle plus
the vehicle manufacturer’s
recommended tongue weight must not
be less than the GVWR. If tongue weight
is specified as a range, the minimum
value must be used.
S9.3 Each motor home and RV
trailer single stage or final stage
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
68461
manufacturer must affix either a motor
home occupant and cargo carrying
capacity (OCCC) label (Figure 3) or a RV
trailer cargo carrying capacity (CCC)
label (Figure 4) to its vehicles that meets
the following criteria:
S9.3.1 The RV load carrying
capacity labels (Figures 3 and 4) and the
RV supplemental labels (Figures 5 and
6) required by S9.3.3(b) must be legible,
visible, moisture resistant, presented in
the English language, have a minimum
print size of 2.4 millimeters (3/32
inches) high and be printed in black
print on a yellow background.
S9.3.2 The weight value for load
carrying capacity on the RV load
carrying capacity labels (Figures 3 and
4) must be displayed to the nearest
kilogram with conversion to the nearest
pound and must be such that the
vehicle does not exceed its GVWR when
loaded with the stated load carrying
capacity. The UVW and the GVWR used
to determine the RV’s load carrying
capacity must reflect the weights and
design of the motor home or RV trailer
as configured for delivery to the dealer/
service facility. If applicable, the weight
of full propane tanks must be included
in the RV’s UVW and the weight of onboard potable water must be treated as
cargo.
S9.3.3 An RV load carrying capacity
label (Figures 3 or 4) must be:
(a) Permanently affixed and must be
visibly located on the interior of the
forward-most exterior passenger door on
the right side of the vehicle or; at the
option of the manufacturer,
(b) A temporary version of the RV
load carrying capacity label (Figures 3
or 4) must be visibly located on the
interior of the forward-most exterior
passenger door on the right side of the
vehicle. A permanent motor home or RV
trailer supplemental label (Figures 5 or
6) must be permanently affixed within
25 millimeters of the placard specified
in S4.3 for motor homes and S4.3.5 for
RV trailers.
S9.3.4 Permanent and temporary
motor home OCCC labels must contain
the following information in accordance
with Figure 3:
(a) The statement: ‘‘MOTOR HOME
OCCUPANT AND CARGO CARRYING
CAPACITY’’ in block letters.
(b) The Vehicle Identification Number
(VIN).
(c) The statement ‘‘THE COMBINED
WEIGHT OF OCCUPANTS AND
CARGO SHOULD NEVER EXCEED:
XXX kg or XXX lbs’’ in block letters
with appropriate values included.
(d) The statement ‘‘Safety belt
equipped seating capacity: XXX’’ with
the appropriate value included. This is
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
68462
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
the total number of safety belt equipped
seating positions.
(e) The statement ‘‘CAUTION: A full
load of water equals XXX kg or XXX lbs
of cargo @ 1 kg/L (8.3 lb/gal) and the
tongue weight of a towed trailer counts
as cargo’’ with appropriate values
included.
S9.3.5 Permanent and temporary RV
trailer CCC labels must contain the
following information in accordance
with Figure 4:
(a) The statement: ‘‘RECREATION
VEHICLE TRAILER CARGO CARRYING
CAPACITY’’ in block letters.
(b) The Vehicle Identification Number
(VIN).
(c) The statement ‘‘THE WEIGHT OF
CARGO SHOULD NEVER EXCEED:
XXX kg or XXX lbs’’ in block letters
with appropriate values included.
(d) The statement ‘‘CAUTION: A full
load of water equals XXX kg or XXX lbs
of cargo @ 1 kg/L (8.3 lb/gal)’’ with
appropriate values included.
S9.3.6 For RVs, the vehicle capacity
weight values and the seating capacity
values (motor homes only) on the
placard required by S4.3 or S4.3.5 must
agree with the load carrying capacity
weight values and the safety belt
equipped seating capacity (motor homes
only) on the RV load carrying capacity
labels (Figures 3 and 4).
S9.3.7 The permanent motor home
supplemental label must contain the
following information in accordance
with Figure 5:
(a) The statement ‘‘CAUTION: A full
load of water equals XXX kg or XXX lbs
of cargo @ 1 kg/L (8.3 lb/gal) and the
tongue weight of a towed trailer counts
as cargo’’ with appropriate values
included.
S9.3.8 The permanent RV trailer
supplemental label must contain the
following information in accordance
with Figure 6:
(a) The statement ‘‘CAUTION: A full
load of water equals XXX kg or XXX lbs
of cargo @ 1 kg/L (8.3 lb/gal)’’ with
appropriate values included.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
S10. Weight added to vehicles
between final vehicle certification and
first retail sale of the vehicle.
S10.1 If weight exceeding the lesser
of 1.5 percent of GVWR or 45.4 kg (100
pounds) is added to a vehicle between
final vehicle certification and first retail
sale of the vehicle, the vehicle capacity
weight values on the placard required
by S4.3 or S4.3.5 and the load carrying
capacity weight values on the RV load
carrying capacity labels (Figures 3 and
4) required by S9.3 must be corrected
using one or a combination of the
following methods:
(a) Permanently affix load carrying
capacity modification labels (Figure 7),
which display the amount the load
carrying capacity is reduced to the
nearest kilogram with conversion to the
nearest pound, within 25 millimeters of
the original, permanent RV load
carrying capacity label (Figure 3 or 4)
and the original placard (Figure 1). The
load carrying capacity modification
labels must be legible, visible,
permanent, moisture resistant,
presented in the English language, have
a minimum print size of 2.4 millimeters
(3/32 inches) high and be printed in
black print on a yellow background, or
(b) If the manufacturer selects
S9.3.3(b), apply a temporary version of
the load carrying capacity modification
label (Figure 7) within 25 millimeters of
the original, temporary RV load carrying
capacity label (Figure 3 or 4) on the
interior of the forward-most exterior
passenger door on the right side of the
vehicle, in addition to applying a
permanent version of the same label
within 25 mm of the placard required by
S4.3 or S4.3.5. Both temporary and
permanent versions of the load carrying
capacity modification label (Figure 7)
may be printed without values and
values may be legibly applied to the
label with a black, fine point, indelible
marker. The label must contain the
statements ‘‘CAUTION—LOAD
CARRYING CAPACITY REDUCED’’ in
block letters and ‘‘Modifications to this
vehicle have reduced the original load
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
carrying capacity by XXX kg or XXX
lbs’’ in accordance with Figure 7. If two
load carrying capacity modification
labels are required (one permanent and
one temporary), the weight values on
each must agree, or
(c) Modify the original, permanent RV
load carrying capacity labels (Figures 3
and 4) and the placard (Figure 1) with
correct vehicle capacity weight values.
If the manufacturer selects S9.3.3(b), the
temporary RV load carrying capacity
labels (Figures 3 and 4) must also be
modified with correct vehicle capacity
weight values. Modification of labels
requires a machine printed overlay with
printed corrected values or blanks for
corrected values that may be entered
with a black, fine-point, indelible
marker. Crossing out old values and
entering corrected values on the original
label is not permissible, or
(d) Replace the original, permanent
RV load carrying capacity labels
(Figures 3 and 4) and the placard
(Figure 1) with the same labels/placard
containing correct vehicle capacity
weight values. If the manufacturer
selects S9.3.3(b), the temporary RV load
carrying capacity labels (Figures 3 and
4) must also be replaced with the same
labels containing correct vehicle
capacity weight values.
S10.2 Corrected load carrying
capacity weight values or the weight
amount the load carrying capacity is
reduced, must reflect the total weight
added between final vehicle
certification and first retail sale and
must be accurate within one percent of
the actual added weight. No action is
required if the weight of the vehicle is
reduced between final vehicle
certification and first retail sale.
§ 571.110
[Amended]
4. Section 571.110 of title 49, Code of
Federal Regulations, is amended by
adding, after S10, Figure 3, Figure 4,
Figure 5, Figure 6, and Figure 7 to read
as follows:
I
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
BILLING CODE 4910–59–C
5. Section 571.120 of title 49, Code of
Federal Regulations, is amended by
revising the section heading, by revising
S1, by revising S2, and by adding S10
through S10.5.2 to read as follows:
I
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
§ 571.120 Tire selection and rims and
motor home/recreation vehicle trailer load
carrying capacity information for motor
vehicles with a GVWR of more than 4,536
kilograms (10,000 pounds).
S1. Scope. This standard specifies tire
and rim selection requirements, rim
marking requirements and motor home/
recreation vehicle trailer load carrying
capacity information.
S2. Purpose. The purpose of this
standard is to provide safe operational
performance by ensuring that vehicles
to which it applies are equipped with
tires of adequate size and load rating
and with rims of appropriate size and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
type designation, and by ensuring that
consumers are informed of motor home/
recreation vehicle trailer load carrying
capacity.
*
*
*
*
*
S10. Each motor home and recreation
vehicle (RV) trailer must meet the
applicable requirements in S10.
S10.1 On motor homes, the sum of
the gross axle weight ratings (GAWR) of
all axles on the vehicle must not be less
than the gross vehicle weight rating
(GVWR).
S10.2 On RV trailers, the sum of the
GAWRs of all axles on the vehicle plus
the vehicle manufacturer’s
recommended tongue weight must not
be less than the GVWR. If tongue weight
is specified as a range, the minimum
value must be used.
S10.3 The tires on each motor home
and RV trailer at first retail sale must be
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
68463
the same size as the tire size on the
labeling required by S5.3.
S10.4 Each motor home and RV
trailer single stage or final stage
manufacturer must affix either a motor
home occupant and cargo carrying
capacity (OCCC) label (Figure 1) or a RV
trailer cargo carrying capacity (CCC)
label (Figure 2) to its vehicles that meets
the following criteria:
S10.4.1 The RV load carrying
capacity labels (Figures 1 and 2) must be
legible, visible, moisture resistant,
presented in the English language, have
a minimum print size of 2.4 millimeters
(3⁄32 inches) high and be printed in black
print on a yellow background.
S10.4.2 The weight value for load
carrying capacity on the RV load
carrying capacity labels (Figures 1 and
2) must be displayed to the nearest
kilogram with conversion to the nearest
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
ER04DE07.043
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
68464
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
pound and must be such that the
vehicle’s weight does not exceed its
GVWR when loaded with the stated
load carrying capacity. The UVW and
the GVWR used to determine the RV’s
load carrying capacity must reflect the
weights and design of the motor home
or RV trailer as configured for delivery
to the dealer/service facility. If
applicable, the weight of full propane
tanks must be included in the RV’s
UVW and the weight of on-board
potable water must be treated as cargo.
S10.4.3 The RV load carrying
capacity labels (Figures 1 and 2) must
be:
(a) Permanently affixed and must be
visibly located on the interior of the
forward-most exterior passenger door on
the right side of the vehicle; or
(b) If a permanent RV load carrying
capacity label (Figure 1 or 2) is affixed
in the location specified at S5.3(b), a
temporary version of the RV load
carrying capacity label (Figure 1 or 2)
may be visibly located on the interior of
the forward-most exterior passenger
door on the right side of the vehicle.
S10.4.4 Permanent and temporary
motor home OCCC labels must contain
the following information in accordance
with Figure 1:
(a) The statement: ‘‘MOTOR HOME
OCCUPANT AND CARGO CARRYING
CAPACITY’’ in block letters.
(b) The Vehicle Identification Number
(VIN).
(c) The statement ‘‘THE COMBINED
WEIGHT OF OCCUPANTS AND
CARGO SHOULD NEVER EXCEED:
XXX kg or XXX lbs’’ in block letters
with appropriate values included.
(d) The statement ‘‘Safety belt
equipped seating capacity: XXX’’ with
the appropriate value included. This is
the total number of safety belt equipped
seating positions.
(e) The statement: ‘‘CAUTION: A full
load of water equals XXX kg or XXX lbs
of cargo @ 1 kg/L (8.3 lb/gal) and the
tongue weight of a towed trailer counts
as cargo’’ with appropriate values
included.
S10.4.5 Permanent and temporary
RV trailer CCC labels must contain the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
following information in accordance
with Figure 2:
(a) The statement: ‘‘RECREATION
VEHICLE TRAILER CARGO CARRYING
CAPACITY’’ in block letters.
(b) The Vehicle Identification Number
(VIN).
(c) The statement: ‘‘THE WEIGHT OF
CARGO SHOULD NEVER EXCEED:
XXX kg or XXX lbs’’ in block letters
with appropriate values included.
(d) The statement: ‘‘CAUTION: A full
load of water equals XXX kg or XXX lbs
of cargo @ 1 kg/L (8.3 lb/gal)’’ with
appropriate values included.
S10.5 Weight added to motor homes
and RV trailers between final vehicle
certification and first retail sale of the
vehicle.
S10.5.1 If weight exceeding 45.4 kg
(100 pounds) is added to a motor home
or RV trailer between final vehicle
certification and first retail sale of the
vehicle, the load carrying capacity
values on the RV load carrying capacity
labels (Figures 1 and 2) required by
S10.4 must be corrected using one or a
combination of the following methods:
(a) Permanently affix the load carrying
capacity modification label (Figure 3)
which displays the amount the load
carrying capacity is reduced to the
nearest kilogram with conversion to the
nearest pound, within 25 millimeters of
the original, permanent RV load
carrying capacity label (Figure 1 or 2).
The load carrying capacity modification
label must be legible, visible,
permanent, moisture resistant,
presented in the English language, have
a minimum print size of 2.4 millimeters
(3/32 inches) high and be printed in
black print on a yellow background. If
the manufacturer selects S10.4.3(b),
apply a temporary version of the load
carrying capacity modification label
(Figure 3) within 25 millimeters of the
original, temporary RV load carrying
capacity label (Figure 1 or 2) on the
interior of the forward-most exterior
passenger door on the right side of the
vehicle. Both temporary and permanent
versions of the load carrying capacity
modification label (Figure 3) may be
printed without values and values may
be legibly applied to the label with a
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
black, fine point, indelible marker. The
label must contain the statements
‘‘CAUTION—LOAD CARRYING
CAPACITY REDUCED’’ in block letters
and ‘‘Modifications to this vehicle have
reduced the original load carrying
capacity by XXX kg or XXX lbs’’ in
accordance with Figure 3 with
appropriate values in place of XXX. If
two load carrying capacity modification
labels are required (one permanent and
one temporary), the weight values on
each must agree, or
(b) Modify the original permanent RV
load carrying capacity label (Figure 1 or
2) with correct load carrying capacity
weight values. If the manufacturer
selects S10.4.3(b), the temporary RV
load carrying capacity label (Figure 1 or
2) must also be modified with correct
load carrying capacity weight values.
Modification of labels requires a
machine printed overlay with printed
corrected values or blanks for corrected
values that may be entered with a black,
fine-point, indelible marker. Crossing
out old values and entering corrected
values on the original label is not
permissible, or
(c) Replace the original, permanent
RV load carrying capacity label (Figure
1 or 2) with the same label containing
correct load carrying capacity weight
values. If the manufacturer selects
S10.4.3(b), the temporary RV load
carrying capacity label (Figure 1 or 2)
must also be replaced with the same
label containing correct load carrying
capacity weight values.
S10.5.2 Corrected load carrying
capacity weight values or the weight
amount the load carrying capacity is
reduced, must reflect the total weight
added between final vehicle
certification and first retail sale and
must be accurate within one percent of
the actual added weight. No re-labeling
is required if the weight of the vehicle
is reduced between final vehicle
certification and the first retail sale.
6. Section 571.120 of title 49, Code of
Federal Regulations, is amended by
adding, after S10, Figure 1, Figure 2,
and Figure 3 to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
Note: This appendix will not appear in the
Code of Federal Regulations.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
Appendix A—Label Requirements for
Various Vehicle/GVWR Combinations
The following scenarios summarize the
label requirements for various vehicle/GVWR
combinations.
Note: This explanation is offered as a guide
to the various labels and figure numbers. An
explanation of the labels applicable to each
vehicle type (i.e., light vehicles other than
RVs, light RVs, and heavy RVs) is set forth
below.
Except for the motor home and RV trailer
supplemental labels in the amendment to
FMVSS No. 110 (Figures 5 and 6), light RVs
and heavy RVs use the same motor home
OCCC label and the same RV trailer CCC
labels. Also both light and heavy RVs use the
same load carrying capacity modification
label. As light vehicles are addressed by
FMVSS No. 110 and heavy vehicles are
addressed by FMVSS No. 120, regulatory text
and figures containing labels had to be
placed in each of the two standards. FMVSS
No. 110 already contained two figures;
therefore the new labels begin with Figure 3.
FMVSS No. 120 had no existing figures;
therefore the new labels begin with Figure 1.
For example:
• The motor home OCCC label in FMVSS
No. 110, Figure 3 is the same as the motor
home OCCC label in FMVSS No. 120, Figure
1.
• The RV trailer CCC label in FMVSS No.
110, Figure 4 is the same as the RV trailer
CCC label in FMVSS No. 120, Figure 2.
• The load carrying capacity modification
label FMVSS No. 110, Figure 7 is the same
as the load carrying capacity modification
label in FMVSS No. 120, Figure 3.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
Figure numbers in the following scenarios
refer to the figures in the regulatory text for
the amendments to FMVSS Nos. 110 and
120.
Light Vehicles Other Than RVs
• If weight added after final vehicle
certification and before first retail sale
exceeds the lesser of 1.5 percent of GVWR or
100 pounds, then
Æ Correct the load carrying capacity
information by modifying or replacing the
FMVSS No. 110 tire placard, or
Æ Install the load carrying capacity
modification label (amendment to Standard
No. 110, Figure 7) within 25 mm of the
FMVSS No. 110 tire placard showing the
amount the load carrying capacity is reduced.
Light RVs
• Option 1—Install a permanent motor
home OCCC label or RV trailer CCC label
(amendment to Standard No. 110, Figure 3 or
4) visibly on the interior of the forward-most
exterior passenger door on the right side of
the vehicle.
Æ If weight added after final vehicle
certification and before first retail sale
exceeds the lesser of 1.5 percent of GVWR or
100 pounds, then
fi Correct the load carrying capacity
information by modifying or replacing the
FMVSS No. 110 tire placard and the
permanent motor home OCCC label or RV
trailer CCC label, or
fi Install permanent load carrying
capacity modification labels (amendment to
Standard No. 110, Figure 7) within 25 mm of
the FMVSS No. 110 tire placard and within
25 mm of the permanent motor home OCCC
label or RV trailer CCC label showing the
amount the load carrying capacity is reduced
(two load carrying capacity modification
labels are required because on a light RV,
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
68465
load carrying capacity information appears
on both the tire placard and the motor home
OCCC label or RV trailer CCC label).
• Option 2—Install a temporary version of
the motor home OCCC label or RV trailer
CCC label (amendment to Standard No. 110,
Figure 3 or 4) visibly on the interior of the
forward-most exterior passenger door on the
right side of the vehicle and install a
permanent motor home or RV trailer
supplemental label (amendment to Standard
No. 110, Figure 5 or 6) within 25 mm of the
FMVSS No. 110 tire placard (motor home
and RV trailer supplemental labels do not
duplicate information that already exists on
the tire placard).
Æ If weight added after final vehicle
certification and before first retail sale
exceeds the lesser of 1.5 percent of GVWR or
100 pounds, then
fi Correct the load carrying capacity
information by modifying or replacing the
tire placard and the temporary version of the
motor home OCCC label or RV trailer CCC
label, or
fi Install a permanent load carrying
capacity modification label (amendment to
Standard No. 110, Figure 7) within 25 mm of
the tire placard and install a temporary
version of the load carrying capacity
modification label (amendment to Standard
No. 110, Figure 7) within 25 mm of the
temporary version of the motor home OCCC
label or RV trailer CCC label in the specified
location. The permanent and temporary
version of the load carrying capacity
modification label will display the amount
the load carrying capacity is reduced. This
scenario would have both the supplemental
label (Figure 5 or 6) and the permanent load
carrying capacity modification label (Figure
7) installed within 25 mm of the placard
(Figure 1).
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
ER04DE07.044
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
68466
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Heavy RVs
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES3
• Option 1—Install a permanent motor
home OCCC label or RV trailer CCC label
(amendment to Standard No. 120, Figure 1 or
2) visibly on the interior of the forward-most
exterior passenger door on the right side of
the vehicle.
Æ If weight added after final vehicle
certification and before first retail sale
exceeds 100 pounds, then
fi Correct the load carrying capacity
information by modifying or replacing the
permanent motor home OCCC label or RV
trailer CCC label, or
fi Install a permanent load carrying
capacity modification label (amendment to
Standard No. 120, Figure 3) within 25 mm of
the permanent motor home OCCC label or RV
trailer CCC label showing the amount the
load carrying capacity is reduced.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Dec 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
• Option 2—Install a temporary version of
the motor home OCCC label or RV trailer
CCC label (amendment to Standard No. 120,
Figure 1 or 2) visibly on the interior of the
forward-most exterior passenger door on the
right side of the vehicle and install a
permanent motor home OCCC label or RV
trailer CCC label in the area specified for tire
information by FMVSS No. 120.14
Æ If weight added after final vehicle
certification and before first retail sale
exceeds 100 pounds, then
14 FMVSS No. 120, S5.3(a) provides the option of
including tire information on the certification label
required by 49 CFR § 567.4 or § 567.5. FMVSS No.
120, S5.3(b) provides the option of including the
tire information on a tire information label affixed
to the vehicle in the manner, location and form
described in § 567.4(b) through (f). Note that
§ 567(d) applies only to trailers.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
fi Correct the load carrying capacity
information by modifying or replacing both
the permanent and temporary motor home
OCCC labels or RV trailer CCC labels, or
fi Install a permanent load carrying
capacity modification label (amendment to
Standard No. 120, Figure 3) within 25 mm of
the permanent motor home OCCC label or RV
trailer CCC label and install a temporary
version of the load carrying capacity
modification label (amendment to Standard
No. 120, Figure 3) within 25 mm of the
temporary motor home OCCC label or RV
trailer CCC label showing the amount the
load carrying capacity is reduced.
Issued on: November 20, 2007.
Nicole R. Nason,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–22962 Filed 12–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\04DER3.SGM
04DER3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 4, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68442-68466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22962]
[[Page 68441]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part III
Department of Transportation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
49 CFR Part 571
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Cargo Carrying Capacity; Final
Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 72 , No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 68442]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2007-0040]
RIN 2127-AJ57
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Cargo Carrying Capacity
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this final rule, we (NHTSA) address the problem of motor
home and recreation vehicle trailer overloading by amending the Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) on tire selection and rims.
This final rule requires manufacturers of all motor homes and
recreation vehicle trailers to provide information to consumers in a
label that informs the consumer about the vehicle's load carrying
capacity. This information is helpful both at the time the consumer is
making a purchase decision and as the consumer uses his or her vehicle.
We also require that the size of tires on motor homes and recreation
vehicle trailers be the same as the size of the tires listed on the
tire information label.
In addition, this rule provides regulatory relief for dealers from
a labeling requirement in the safety standard on tire selection and
rims for light vehicles. The standard's requirement can currently
require dealers which add even small amounts of weight to re-label the
vehicles. Under today's amendment, any party that adds weight to a
completed vehicle exceeding the lesser of 1.5 percent of the vehicle's
gross vehicle weight rating or 100 pounds (before first sale to the
retail customer) is required to disclose this extra weight on labels
affixed to the vehicles. Lesser amounts of weight may be added without
changing or adding labels.
It is our belief that this rule complements the efforts of the
recreation vehicle industry to provide consumers with information in
order to help reduce overloading motor homes and recreation vehicle
trailers. This rulemaking was initiated in response to a petition from
Ms. Justine May.
DATES: Effective date: The effective date for this final rule is June
2, 2008. Optional immediate compliance is available as of December 4,
2007.
Petitions for reconsideration: Petitions for reconsideration of the
final rule must be received not later than January 18, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Petitions for reconsideration of the final rule must refer
to the docket and notice number set forth above and be submitted to the
Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For non-legal issues, you may call Mr. William D. Evans, Office of
Crash Avoidance Standards at (202) 366-2272. His FAX number is (202)
366-2990.
For legal issues, you may call Ms. Dorothy Nakama, Office of the
Chief Counsel at (202) 366-2992. Her FAX number is (202) 366-3820.
You may send mail to both of these officials at National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. The May Petition
B. Joint Industry Petition for Rulemaking and Interim Relief
Concerning Standard No. 110 Issues
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking of August 31, 2005
III. Overview
A. Summary of Comments
B. Summary of the Final Rule
C. Summary of Significant Differences Between the NPRM and the
Final Rule
IV. Public Comments and NHTSA's Response
A. Applicability of This Final Rule
1. Whether the Final Rule Should Apply to All RVs, Not Just to
RVs with Gross Vehicle Weight Ratings Greater than 4,536 Kilograms
(10,000 Pounds)
2. Excluding Light RVs from FMVSS No. 110 Labeling Requirements
B. Definitions
1. NPRM
2. The Definition of ``Travel Trailer'' and ``Motor Home''
3. NPRM's Term ``Tongue Load Rating'' for RV Trailers
C. GVWR, GAWR and Tire Load Information for Motor Homes and
Recreation Vehicle Trailers
1. NPRM
2. Requirement that Heavy RVs be Delivered to the Customer With
the Same Size Tires That are Listed on the Vehicle Certification
Label or Tire Information Label
3. Whether the ``Make Inoperative'' Prohibition Applies to the
FMVSS No. 110 Vehicle Placard and Optional Tire Inflation Pressure
Label
D. Determining Occupant Capacity Weight
1. NPRM
2. RV Occupant Capacity Weight (OCW) and the Weight of a
Standard Occupant
E. Location of Labels
1. NPRM
2. Revised RV Load Carrying Capacity Labels
3. Label Locations for Heavy RVs and All Light Vehicles
4. Location of the FMVSS No. 110 Load Carrying Capacity
Modification Label
F. Label Format and Content
1. NPRM
2. Revised RV Load Carrying Capacity Labels
G. Addition of Weight to FMVSS No. 110 Vehicles and FMVSS No.
120 Motor Homes and Travel Trailers Between Vehicle Certification
and First Retail Sale of the Vehicle
1. Proposal Concerning FMVSS No. 110
2. Proposal Concerning FMVSS No. 120
3. Comments and Decision Concerning Weight Added to Heavy RVs
and All Light Vehicles After Final Vehicle Certification and Before
First Retail Sale
H. Other Issues
1. Whether the Final Rule Should Protect Against Overloading
Tires, Wheels, Axles and Suspensions on RVs
2. RV Weight and Weighing Issues
3. Numbering in Proposed FMVSS No. 110 Regulatory Text
4. Scope of Notice for Joint Petition Issues
5. Response to Issues of the Joint Petition
6. The Meaning of ``Stated Weight Ratings'' on FMVSS No. 110
Placards
7. Issues Outside the Scope of this Rulemaking
V. Final Rule
VI. Leadtime
VII. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures
B. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
C. Executive Order 13045 (Economically Significant Rules
Affecting Children)
D. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
F. National Environmental Policy Act
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
H. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
I. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
J. Plain Language
K. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
Final Rule Regulatory Text
I. Background
A. The May Petition
In a petition dated January 21, 2000, Ms. Justine May petitioned
NHTSA to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) Number
120, Tire selection and rims for motor vehicles other than passenger
cars. Ms. May requested that FMVSS No. 120 be revised in such a way
that motor vehicles would be equipped with tires that meet maximum load
standards when the vehicle is loaded with a reasonable amount of
luggage and the total number of passengers the vehicle is designed to
carry. Ms. May's stated reason for her petition was her family's
personal experience with a fifth-wheel travel trailer. She stated that
there was no information provided with her trailer stating its cargo
carrying capacity (CCC). Ms. May believes that loading her vehicle with
cargo for a trip placed it in an overloaded condition, resulting in
[[Page 68443]]
tire blowouts. The agency granted Ms. May's petition for rulemaking.
B. Joint Industry Petition for Rulemaking and Interim Relief Concerning
Standard No. 110 Issues
Prior to publication of an NPRM addressing the May petition, NHTSA
received a Joint Petition for Rulemaking and Interim Relief concerning
certain FMVSS No. 110 provisions that were scheduled to take effect on
September 1, 2005 regarding vehicle capacity weight and tire
information. The Joint Petition \1\ requested a notice of interim final
rulemaking authorizing or clarifying that the vehicle capacity weight
statement required by FMVSS No. 110 allows for a reasonable tolerance,
that vehicle capacity weight be labeled as ``estimated'' and as
``originally manufactured,'' that placards/labels may be modified
rather than replaced and that shipping weight or weight determined by
scales of reasonable accuracy may be used to determine the additional
weight of equipment added to vehicles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ``Joint Petition'' means the ``Joint Petition for Rulemaking
and Interim Relief; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 110; Vehicle Capacity Weight and Tire Information'' dated July
29, 2005 which was submitted to NHTSA by a group of trade
organizations through Mike Kastner (NTEA) and Douglas Greenhaus
(NADA). The document is available in docket NHTSA-2005-22242-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking of August 31, 2005
On August 31, 2005, NHTSA published in the Federal Register (70 FR
51707) (DMS Docket No. NHTSA-2005-22242), the NPRM to address the
problem of motor home and travel trailer overloading. The agency
explained in some detail the safety need for the proposed rule, which
would help to prevent motor home and travel trailer overloading.\2\
NHTSA cited data from the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association
(RVIA) regarding the number of recreation vehicles and from the
Recreation Vehicle Safety Education Foundation (RVSEF) showing the
scope of the overloading problem. The agency described characteristics
of motor homes and travel trailers, explaining how they may become
overloaded, and cited cargo carrying capacity-related consumer
information and labels that are currently required by NHTSA. Finally,
NHTSA described cargo carrying capacity consumer information and labels
currently required or recommended by Transport Canada and the RVIA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For a full explanation of the safety need for the
rulemaking, and data cited in support, please refer to the NPRM of
August 31, 2005 at 70 FR 51707.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the NPRM, we also included several provisions to address the
Joint Petition concerning FMVSS No. 110. Included was a proposal to
permit dealers to add weight up to 0.5 percent of the GVWR (of a
vehicle subject to FMVSS No. 110) before first retail sale, without
need for the dealers to re-label or re-placard the vehicle.
III. Overview
A. Summary of Comments
In response to the NPRM, NHTSA received comments from the
following: Adaptive Driving Alliance (ADA); Alliance of Automobile
Manufacturers (Alliance); Association of International Automobile
Manufacturers (AIAM); Marine Retailers Association of America (MRAA);
National Association of Trailer Manufacturers (NATM); National
Automobile Dealers Association (NADA); National Marine Manufacturers
Association (NMMA); National Mobility Equipment Dealers Association
(NMEDA); National RV Dealers Association (RVDA); National Trailer
Dealers Association (NTDA); National Truck Equipment Association
(NTEA); Recreation Vehicle Industry Association (RVIA); Rubber
Manufacturers Association (RMA); Mr. Nate J. Seymour (Seymour);
Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA); Toyota Motor North
America, Inc. (Toyota); Mr. James Weston (Weston); and Mr. Tim Walker
(Walker).
Many of the commenters addressed the applicability of the proposed
rule, and recommended that the final rule should apply to all motor
homes and travel trailers, not just those with GVWRs over 4,536 kg
(10,000 pounds). We were also asked to simplify the definition of
``occupant capacity weight.'' Some commenters, notably the RVIA, asked
NHTSA to specify multiple locations (three) for the labeling
information. There were recommendations for more detailed information
on cargo carrying capacity, including definitions of GVWR, unloaded
vehicle weight, and cargo carrying capacity, and a request for NHTSA to
provide more guidance on the effects of dealer installed equipment on
cargo carrying capacity and the distribution of cargo.
Reiterating issues raised in previous rulemakings, and
interpretation letters, some commenters asked for revisions in FMVSS
No. 110 vehicle (tire) placarding \3\ requirements. Relief was also
supported for instances when weight is added to a vehicle after final
vehicle certification and before first retail sale. Many commenters
stated that the relief proposed in the NPRM, 0.5 percent of vehicle
GVWR, was too low.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For purposes of this document, ``tire placard'' means the
vehicle placard required by S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Summary of the Final Rule
After considering the public comments, and for the reasons
discussed in detail later in this document, we have decided to require
all motor homes and recreation vehicle (RV) trailers to bear a label
that informs the consumer about the vehicle's load carrying capacity.
The final rule defines the term ``recreation vehicle trailer'' rather
than using the term proposed in the NPRM, ``travel trailer.'' We also
require that the size of tires on motor homes and RV trailers be the
same as the size of tires listed on the tire information label.
For motor homes and RV trailers, we require labels that display the
VIN, the weight of a full load of water, the unit weight of water and a
cautionary statement that the weight of water is part of cargo. Motor
home labels must display the maximum weight of occupants and cargo and
RV trailer labels must display the maximum weight of cargo. In
addition, for motor homes, the label must show the safety belt equipped
seating capacity and must indicate that the tongue weight of a towed
trailer counts as cargo.
To promote a consistent conspicuous label location, this final rule
specifies that permanent load carrying capacity labels be affixed to
the interior of the forward-most exterior passenger door on the right
side of the vehicle and be visible. As an alternative (to address
aesthetic considerations) the rule permits manufacturers to place a
temporary label to the interior of the forward-most exterior passenger
door on the right side of the vehicle and apply a permanent label in
the area of the vehicle specified by FMVSS Nos. 110 and 120 for tire
information.
In addition, this final rule adopts a threshold for correcting load
carrying capacity information on tire placards, motor home occupant and
cargo carrying capacity (OCCC) labels and RV trailer CCC labels of the
lesser of 1.5 percent of GVWR or 100 pounds, greatly decreasing the
need to correct the information. When correction of load carrying
capacity is needed, this rule permits the use of generic labels where
corrected values can be legibly entered using a black, fine point,
indelible marker. This permits dealers to stock one generic load
carrying capacity modification label.
[[Page 68444]]
In this final rule, the addition of the load carrying capacity
modification label is one of three options that can be used to correct
load carrying capacity information when dealer added weight exceeds the
threshold. Dealers/service facilities are permitted to: (1) Replace
existing tire placards, motor home OCCC labels or RV trailer CCC labels
with new placards/labels containing correct load carrying capacity
information; (2) modify existing tire placards, motor home OCCC labels
or RV trailer CCC labels so they display correct load carrying capacity
information; or (3) add a load carrying capacity modification label
within 25 mm of the existing tire placard and/or the motor home OCCC
label or RV trailer CCC label.
C. Summary of Significant Differences Between the NPRM and the Final
Rule
This final rule differs from the August 2005 NPRM in the following
significant ways. In the NPRM, NHTSA proposed that the rule apply to
motor homes and travel trailers with GVWRs greater than 4,536 kg
(10,000 pounds). This final rule applies to all motor homes and
recreation vehicle trailers, regardless of GVWR. In the NPRM, NHTSA
proposed that in determining cargo carrying capacity, that the occupant
capacity weight be determined. In this final rule, we adopt labels that
display the maximum weight allotted for both occupants and cargo. In
the NPRM, NHTSA proposed one location for the permanent label--affixed
to the interior of the forward-most exterior passenger door on the
right side of the vehicle. This location has been adopted in the final
rule. In addition, the final rule permits manufacturers the option of
placing a temporary label in the specified location and applying an
identical permanent label in the area of the vehicle specified by FMVSS
Nos. 110 and 120 for tire information.
In the NPRM, NHTSA proposed for both FMVSS No. 110 and 120
vehicles, that if weight greater than 0.5 percent of GVWR is added by
the dealer before first retail sale, the dealer would be required to
correct the stated load carrying capacity information. In the final
rule, the weight has been adjusted to the lesser of 1.5 percent of GVWR
or 100 pounds.
Finally, in the NPRM, NHTSA proposed labels with detailed
information on how the cargo carrying capacity is calculated. In this
final rule, we adopt labels that have been simplified.
IV. Public Comments and NHTSA's Response
A. Applicability of This Final Rule
1. Whether the Final Rule Should Apply to All RVs, Not Just to RVs
with GVWRs Greater Than 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds)--In the NPRM, NHTSA
proposed that the new labeling rule apply to motor homes and travel
trailers over 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds). Seymour, the RVDA and the RVIA
all commented that the proposed RV labeling requirements should not be
limited to motor homes and travel trailers with GVWRs over 4,536 kg
(10,000 pounds) but should apply to all RVs.
RVDA commented that the proposed CCC labels for heavy RVs \4\
provide useful information for both consumers and dealers. It argued
that consumers who purchase light RVs should also have the benefit of
the same detailed information. RVDA also indicated that if the proposed
regulatory text was made final, there would be three different labels
for RVs: (1) Heavy RVs would have the FMVSS No. 120 CCC label which
would most likely replace the RVIA label; (2) Light RVs would have the
FMVSS No. 110 tire placard with load carrying capacity information; and
(3) Most light RVs may also have a more detailed RVIA label. According
to that organization, these different labels for heavy RVs versus light
RVs may confuse consumers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Throughout this document, ``light RV'' means a recreation
vehicle with a GVWR of 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds) or less. ``Heavy
RV'' means a recreation vehicle with a GVWR of more than 4,536 kg.
Motor homes, travel trailers (as proposed to be defined in the NPRM)
and recreation vehicle trailers are all subgroups of recreation
vehicles (RVs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
RVIA commented that the majority of ``travel trailers,'' some
smaller motor homes and virtually all RV conversion vehicles \5\ have
GVWRs of 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds) or less and are subject to the FMVSS
No. 110 load carrying capacity labeling requirements. Travel trailers
with GVWRs greater than 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds) and most motor homes
would be subject to the proposed FMVSS No. 120 NPRM CCC label. RVIA
recommended consistency of the information provided to RV consumers
regardless of the RV's size. RVIA stated that all RVs regardless of
their GVWRs have the primary function of providing mobile, temporary,
on-site living quarters, and all contain residential features such as
sleeping accommodations, bathrooms, cooking facilities, water storage
and cargo storage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ As defined by RVIA, conversion vehicle means vans, SUVs and
pickup trucks that are manufactured by an automaker, then altered
for recreational use by a company specializing in customizing
vehicles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
RVIA cited its 2004 sales statistics that approximately 250,300 RVs
shipped were light RVs and would be subject to FMVSS No. 110
requirements, and approximately 112,300 RVs shipped were heavy RVs and
would be subject to FMVSS No. 120 requirements. RVIA said that if the
proposed CCC label requirements are limited to heavy RVs, a large
portion of the overloading problem would not be addressed and different
labels for different classes of RVs would confuse consumers, minimizing
the benefits of the new RV labeling requirements.
Since NHTSA seeks to apply the load carrying capacity label
requirements most effectively, it has decided to apply the new
requirements to all RVs that fit the appropriate definitions,
regardless of GVWR. We believe this is a logical outgrowth of the
proposal, and note that the request for wider applicability came from
the RVIA and RVDA which represent approximately 95 percent of the RV
industry, consisting of many small businesses. As they explained in the
comments, both light and heavy RVs have similar uses, loading
characteristics, and overloading issues; a substantial number of RVs
sold have GVWRs of 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds) or less. Applying this
final rule to all RVs will require RV load carrying capacity label
requirements to appear in both Standard Nos. 110 and 120.
We note that since the August 2005 NPRM was published, amendments
to Standard Nos. 110 and 120 took effect on September 1, 2005. Before
the amendments, Standard No. 110 applied to passenger cars and Standard
No. 120 applied to other vehicles. After the amendments took effect,
Standard No. 110 applies to vehicles with GVWRs of 4,536 kg (10,000
pounds) or less, and Standard No. 120 applies to vehicles with a GVWR
of more than 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds).
2. Excluding Light RVs from FMVSS No. 110 Labeling Requirements--As
part of its recommended labeling format, RVIA suggested that light RVs
be excluded from the labeling requirements of FMVSS No. 110, and RVs
only be subject to RVIA's suggested format. If adopted, RVIA's
recommendation would mean that for light RVs, load carrying capacity
information would not be required on the FMVSS No. 110 tire placard.
Manufacturers that are RVIA members would place RVIA's suggested small
label with similar load carrying capacity information in the same area
as the tire placard.
NHTSA has decided not to change the existing tire placard
requirements in
[[Page 68445]]
FMVSS No. 110. Some of these requirements have recently become
effective and additional amendments are scheduled to become effective
in the near future. However, in this final rule, NHTSA is adding
additional language to FMVSS Nos. 110 and 120 in order to accommodate
the RV load carrying capacity labeling requirements. As more fully
explained in the section titled ``Location of Labels,'' this final rule
has an alternative labeling scheme that prevents duplication of
information when both a tire placard and a motor home OCCC label or RV
trailer CCC label are located in the same area of the vehicle.
B. Definitions
1. NPRM--In the August 2005 NPRM, NHTSA proposed that the rule
apply to motor homes and travel trailers. We proposed to revise the
definition of ``motor home'' (included in 49 CFR Part 571.3) to refer
to ``propane'' rather than ``LP gas supply'' and to add a new
definition of ``travel trailer'' to Part 571.3 as follows:
Motor home means a multi-purpose vehicle with motive power that
is designed to provide temporary residential accommodations, as
evidenced by the presence of at least four of the following
facilities: Cooking; refrigeration or ice box; self-contained
toilet; heating and/or air conditioning; a potable water supply
system including a faucet and a sink; and a separate 110-125 volt
electrical power supply and/or propane.
Travel trailer means a trailer designed to be drawn by a vehicle
with motive power by means of a bumper or frame hitch or a special
hitch in a truck bed and is designed to provide temporary
residential accommodations, as evidenced by the presence of at least
four of the following facilities: Cooking; refrigeration or ice box;
self-contained toilet; heating and/or air conditioning; a potable
water supply system including a faucet and a sink; and a separate
110-125 volt electrical power supply and/or propane.
2. The Definition of ``Travel Trailer'' and ``Motor Home''--A
definition of ``travel trailer'' was proposed in the NPRM since the
majority of heavy RV trailers, including 5th wheel travel trailers and
all other travel trailers are considered ``travel trailers.'' As more
fully explained elsewhere in this final rule, since this final rule
applies the motor home OCCC label and the RV trailer CCC label to all
RVs regardless of GVWR, the definition must apply to more types of RV
trailers. NHTSA believes that it is therefore necessary to make the
trailer term being defined more generic.
In this final rule, NHTSA changes the term being defined from
``travel trailer'' to ``recreation vehicle trailer.'' The load carrying
capacity labeling requirements in this final rule apply to all vehicles
that meet the definitions of ``motor home'' and ``recreation vehicle
trailer'' (RV trailer). RV trailers include all towable RVs such as
folding camping trailers, conventional travel trailers, fifth-wheel
travel trailers, travel trailers with expansion ends, sport utility RV
trailers, and all other trailers intended for recreational purposes
that meet the definition of ``recreation vehicle trailer.''
Raising similar concerns, NATM commented that the ``travel
trailer'' definition inadvertently includes ordinary cargo trailers
with built-in living quarters, trailers that NATM's members (few of
whom are members of RVIA) build primarily for transporting horses,
livestock, automobiles and other commercial products. These cargo
trailers also include four of the six specified facilities NHTSA
proposed as evidence of temporary living or residential accommodations.
These ``living quarters'' or facilities are often installed after
the horse trailer or auto hauler leaves the trailer manufacturer's
plant. Since these living quarter-equipped cargo trailers are designed
primarily to haul commercial cargo, their living quarters occupy much
less floor space than do RV travel trailers. The cargo trailers are not
labeled to disclose cargo carrying capacity. NATM argued that mandating
their labeling with a RV trailer CCC label would impose an unnecessary
burden upon these manufacturers, most of which are small businesses.
NATM asked NHTSA to revise the proposed definition of ``travel
trailer'' to include the following exception to the definition: ``* * *
except trailers designed primarily to transport cargo.'' It argued that
this more limited definition is fully consistent with the intent of the
proposed new consumer-labeling requirement.
NHTSA agrees with NATM that it did not intend the definition of
``travel trailer'' to include the types of commercial cargo trailers
that NATM described in its comment. Trailers designed to accommodate
cargo such as livestock and racing cars usually have ample space and
GVWR for such cargo, and the space allotted for living quarters is
incidental. Therefore, in this final rule, the definition of
``recreation vehicle trailer'' will not include trailers ``designed
primarily to transport cargo.''
NHTSA further notes that trailers ``designed primarily to transport
cargo'' does not include trailers (used for personal purposes) known as
``sport utility RVs'' or ``toy haulers.'' These trailers usually have
spacious rather than incidental living quarters and provide a cargo
area for smaller items for personal use such as motorcycles, mountain
bikes, all terrain vehicles (ATVs), snowmobiles, canoes or other types
of recreational gear. NHTSA intends these vehicles to be included in
definition of ``recreation vehicle trailer'' and be subject to the
requirements of this final rule.
RVIA commented that the definition of ``travel trailer''
inadvertently excludes some folding camping trailers which collapse
into a low profile unit in the travel mode. Upon reaching the camping
destination, the unit when deployed has a ``pop-up'' roof, padded
sleeping surface extensions and canvas side walls. Some of the smaller
and less expensive models may not have four of the six specified
facilities noted in the proposed ``travel trailer'' definition. RVIA
suggested that these smaller folding camping trailers would be covered
by modifying the definition of ``travel trailer'' to focus on the
primary purpose of the trailer, not simply the presence of certain
amenities alone. Thus, the definition recommended by RVIA would only
require one of the facilities proposed in the NPRM to be considered a
``recreation vehicle trailer.''
NHTSA has decided not to adopt RVIA's comment. The definition for
``travel trailer'' proposed in the NPRM was fashioned after the
definition of ``motor home'' at 49 CFR 571.3, and to minimize
confusion, NHTSA seeks to keep the ``facilities'' and the number of
facilities needed to provide temporary residential accommodations in
both definitions consistent.
In this final rule, the folding camping trailers that are not
subject to the heavy RV CCC label requirements will have GVWRs of 4,536
kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less and will be required to have tire
placard load carrying capacity information required by FMVSS No. 110.
NHTSA does not believe that the folding camping trailers are
significantly contributing to the RV overloading problem, as when the
trailer is folded, there is little room for cargo.
Finally, in this final rule, ``motor homes'' will include all
motorized RVs such as Type A motor homes, Type B motor homes, Type C
motor homes, van conversions, truck conversions, sport-utility
conversions, and other motor vehicles that meet the definition of
``motor home.'' There were no comments to the proposed change to the
``motor home'' definition to refer to propane. Thus, the proposed
definition of ``motor home'' is adopted as final.
3. NPRM's Term ``Tongue Load Rating'' for RV Trailers--NATM
[[Page 68446]]
commented that the term ``tongue load rating'' used in the NPRM is not
recognized in the trailer industry, and recommended that ``measured
tongue weight'' be used instead. NATM also recommended that S10.2 in
the proposed regulatory text of FMVSS No. 120 be changed to ``On travel
trailers, the sum of the GAWRs of all axles on the vehicle plus the
minimum recommended tongue weight must not be less than the GVWR.''
NATM said that manufacturers cannot control the loading patterns of
end-users and therefore, most manufacturers recommend a range of tongue
weights for their particular trailer designs.
RVIA commented that the term ``tongue load rating'' is undefined
and suggested that the term ``hitch/pin load rating'' be used in place
of ``tongue load rating'' in the final rule.
NHTSA agrees that the term ``tongue load rating'' may not be widely
used in the trailer industry and agrees with the public comments.
Therefore, in the final rule, NHTSA will make the appropriate changes
to the regulatory text and will use the terms ``tongue weight'' and/or
``hitch pin load'' rather than ``tongue load rating.''
``Tongue weight'' means the downward force exerted on the ball of a
hitch by the trailer coupler. In the case of a fifth-wheel travel
trailer, it is the downward force exerted on the truck bed by the
trailer. The manufacturer will specify the tongue weight or the tongue
weight range according to the design of a particular trailer. Tongue
weights are typically 10 to 14 percent of the trailer's weight;
however, the range can vary depending on the trailer hitch
configuration and the number of axles on the trailer. The axle ratings
of the trailer can be based on the fact that portions of the trailer
weight will be transferred to the tow vehicle. If a range is specified,
the axles should be designed to accommodate the worst-case scenario
which would be when tongue weight is at the minimum portion of its
range and more weight is shifted to the axles. Consumers should load
their trailers in a fashion that keeps the tongue weight within the
range recommended by the manufacturer.
C. GVWR, GAWR and Tire Load Information for Motor Homes and Recreation
Vehicle Trailers
1. NPRM--In the NPRM, we proposed to amend FMVSS No. 120 to require
that the sum of the GAWRs of all the axles on a motor home and that the
sum of the GAWRs of all the axles on a ``travel trailer'' plus the
``tongue load rating'' not be less than the GVWR of each respective
vehicle. We noted that the proposed requirement would not prevent
individual tires on motor homes and ``travel trailers'' from being
overloaded.
In the NPRM, we also proposed to require that the size of the tires
that are on motor homes and ``travel trailers'' at the time of first
retail sale be the same size as the tires on the tire label required by
FMVSS No. 120. FMVSS No. 120 requires certain information on either the
Part 567 vehicle certification label or on a separate tire information
label.\6\ Since inflation tire pressure is critical to tire loading,
the tire label provides the recommended tire size and cold inflation
pressure for the vehicle. If a different tire is placed on the vehicle,
it may require a different tire inflation pressure. Consumers may refer
to the tire label for inflation pressures. If the size of the tire on
the label and the size of the tire on the vehicle are not the same, the
consumer may inflate the vehicle's tires to the wrong pressure. In some
cases, inflating vehicle tires to the wrong pressure can intensify the
effects of overloading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In FMVSS No. 120, S5.3(a) provides the option of including
tire information on the certification label required by Sec. 567.4
or Sec. 567.5. In FMVSS No. 120, S5.3(b) provides the option of
including the tire information on a tire information label affixed
to the vehicle in the manner, location and form described in 49 CFR
567.4(b) through (f). Note that Sec. 567(d) applies only to
trailers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We also proposed that manufacturers disclose the CCC of motor homes
and ``travel trailers.'' NHTSA anticipated that consumers would use
this information both to purchase vehicles with CCCs that will meet
their needs and as guidance for how they may subsequently load their
vehicles in a safe manner. However, we did not propose to specify a
minimum required CCC for any motor home or travel trailer.
2. Requirement That Heavy RVs be Delivered to the Consumer with the
Same Size Tires That Are Listed on the Vehicle Certification Label or
Tire Information Label--As earlier noted, in the NPRM, NHTSA proposed
to require that RVs with GVWRs of more than 4,536 kilograms (10,000
pounds) have tires at first retail sale that are the same size as the
tires listed on the vehicle certification label or tire information
label. RMA commented that the requirement should read: ``The tires on
each motor home and travel trailer at first retail sale must have the
same or greater tire size and load rating as the tire size and load
rating on the labeling required by S5.3 (of FMVSS No. 120). If the
tire/wheel assemblies on the motor home or travel trailer at first
retail sale are heavier than those listed on the required label, the
additional weight must be added to the unloaded vehicle weight (UVW).''
RVDA commented that after consulting with many dealers and
aftermarket suppliers of RVs, it believes a requirement that RVs with
GVWRs of more than 4,536 kg have tires at first retail sale that are
the same size as the tires listed on the vehicle certification label or
tire information label is not a problem in the RV industry for either
motorized RVs or travel trailers. RVDA's understanding is that if a
customer requests customized tires or rims on an RV, the dealer can
only install tires and rims that are the same size as the sizes
provided on the tire information label. Otherwise, dealers will not
perform the customization.
NHTSA notes that the proposed requirement was not intended to
prevent dealers/service facilities from changing the tire size and
providing customized tires with vehicles before first retail sale. It
simply states that the size of the tires on the vehicle at first retail
sale must agree with the size of the tires listed on the tire
information label. The dealer may replace the tires and correct or
replace the tire information label or the vehicle certification label
to reflect the new tire size so long as the vehicle continues to meet
all applicable requirements. Therefore, revising the requirement
according to RMA's suggestion would not be necessary as it is desirable
that the tire size on the vehicle and the tire size on the label agree.
With respect to RVDA's comment, NHTSA notes that the dealer/service
facility may change the tires to a different size as long as the tire
size information on the label is corrected to agree with the tire size
on the vehicle at the time of first retail sale and the vehicle
otherwise continues to meet all applicable requirements. The label
assures that the consumer will always know the size of the tires that
were on the vehicle at delivery which presumably is a tire size
recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. If the replacement tires weigh
more than the original tires, the additional weight will be included in
the total weight added between final vehicle certification and first
retail sale.
Dealers/service facilities usually correct tire sizes on FMVSS No.
110 tire placards by either replacing or obscuring the original tire
placard with an identical tire placard with corrected tire sizes or
obscuring a portion of the original tire placard with an overlay that
matches the original tire placard and allows new tire sizes to be
entered. If the new tire sizes are not machine
[[Page 68447]]
printed on the replacement tire placard or partial overlay and there
are blanks on these labels, the new tire sizes may be legibly entered
with a black, indelible, fine-point marker. This final rule does not
permit crossing out incorrect values and entering new values as a means
of updating tire sizes. The final rule requires dealers to replace or
obscure the FMVSS No. 120 tire information label or vehicle
certification label to reflect the new tire sizes.
3. Whether the ``Make Inoperative'' Prohibition Applies to the
FMVSS No. 110 Vehicle Placard and Optional Tire Inflation Pressure
Label--NHTSA received comments from SEMA, NTEA, NADA and ADA regarding
how the ``make inoperative'' prohibition applies to the FMVSS No. 110
tire placard after first retail sale. The comments asked if modifiers
and repair facilities are required to update and/or replace tire
placard/labels or whether the requirement ends after first retail sale.
Recent NHTSA interpretations issued to NMEDA, SEMA and Bruno on
April 7, 2006, explain that it would not be a violation of the 49
U.S.C. Sec. 30122 ``make inoperative'' prohibition, with respect to
S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110, if modifiers change the vehicle's tire size,
cold inflation pressure, and/or cargo capacity rating after first
retail sale and do not update the tire placard.
In evaluating this question, NHTSA focused on the language of S4.3
of FMVSS No. 110. One of the items of safety information required by
S4.3 is identified in paragraph (d), which reads:
Tire size designation, indicated by the headings ``size'' or
``original tire size'' or ``original size,'' and ``spare tire'' or
``spare,'' for the tires installed at the time of the first purchase
for purposes other than resale. For full size spare tires, the
statement ``see above'' may, at the manufacturer's option replace
the tire size designation. If no spare tire is provided, the word
``none'' must replace the tire size designation;'' [Emphasis added.]
The agency thus stated that the requirement for one of the critical
items of safety information to be provided on the tire placard is
specifically expressed in terms of the ``tires installed at the time of
first purchase for purposes other than resale.'' NHTSA also noted that
there is a relationship between a number of the items required to be
specified on the tire placard.
NHTSA further observed that regardless of what changes a modifier
may make to a vehicle, it does not change the size of the tires that
were installed at the time of the first purchase for purposes other
than resale (the information S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110 requires to be on
the placard). Given this, and recognizing the relationship between a
number of the items required to be specified on the tire placard, NHTSA
expressed its opinion that it would not be a violation of the Section
30122 ``make inoperative'' provision, with respect to S4.3 of FMVSS No.
110, if modifiers change the vehicle's tire size, cold inflation
pressure, and/or cargo capacity rating, but do not update the tire
placard.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ In the interpretation letter, NHTSA went on to note that the
potential inconsistency between the information on the placard and
the actual vehicle could be ``misleading and dangerous to vehicle
operators.'' Thus, NHTSA encouraged any party that modifies a used
vehicle ``so that the tire safety information is no longer accurate
to either add a new label to the vehicle which indicates the correct
tire safety information or add a warning label * * * indicating that
the tire safety information placard is no longer accurate.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similarly, the requirement to correct the weight value that the
weight of occupants and cargo should never exceed on the motor home
OCCC label or the value that the weight of cargo should never exceed on
the RV trailer CCC label ends after first retail sale. After first
retail sale, it is up to the consumer to subtract any weight added
after first retail sale from the vehicle's load carrying capacity.
NHTSA notes, however, that in accordance with 49 CFR 595.7,
businesses that modify vehicles to accommodate people with disabilities
must provide the vehicle owner with a document that indicates any
reduction in the load carrying capacity of a vehicle of more than 100
kg (220 lb) after the modifications are complete.
D. Determining Occupant Capacity Weight
1. NPRM--In the NPRM, NHTSA stated that in order to determine the
CCC of a motor home, the occupant capacity weight (OCW) must be
determined. The OCW is then grouped with the other weight factors (such
as weight of full fresh water, propane and the unloaded vehicle weight)
that must be subtracted from the vehicle's GVWR in order to determine
the portion of the GVWR available for carrying cargo. Therefore, in the
NPRM, NHTSA proposed that the greater of the total number of safety
belt-equipped seating positions or the total number of sleeping
positions be multiplied by 68 kilograms (150 pounds) to determine the
OCW. This OCW value would be used to determine the weight of maximum
occupants for the motor home. NHTSA believed that this method would
capture the worst-case OCW scenario in order to prevent the possibility
of overloading.
2. RV Occupant Capacity Weight (OCW) and the Weight of a Standard
Occupant--Seymour agreed with NHTSA, commenting that since families
often carry a tent or tow a travel trailer for children, basing the OCW
strictly on the number of sleeping positions does not necessarily
reflect the number of passengers who will be traveling in the vehicle.
Seymour further commented that the allocation of 68 kg (150 pounds) per
person in the standard is an underestimate and will lead to
overloading.
Walker also agreed with the NHTSA proposal, commenting that the use
of only sleeping positions to determine the number of occupants the RV
is intended to carry undermines the entire cargo carrying capacity
calculation. The number of occupants a motor home is intended to carry
must also be based on the number of seats provided. Basing the OCW
calculation strictly on sleeping positions allows manufacturers to
boost the available cargo carrying capacity and increases the
likelihood that the RV will be operated in an overloaded condition when
seating positions are fully occupied. Walker recommended the practice
be prohibited.
RMA commented that labeling and/or instructions should indicate
that cargo weight could be substituted for occupant weight if fewer
than maximum occupants are transported. Consumers would thus get
maximum use out of their available load carrying capacity. RMA also
commented that the weight allocation of 68 kg (150 pounds) per occupant
is low.
RVIA commented that in virtually every case, the total safety belt-
equipped seating positions in a motor home will be greater than the
number of sleeping positions. NHTSA's method of determining OCW assumes
that all safety belt-equipped seating positions will always be occupied
when determining the vehicle's cargo carrying capacity. RVIA stated
that while it is certainly possible, it is unrealistic and counter-
productive to presume that this is always the case. That organization
argued that, consequently, the consumer will be misled by an
inaccurately low cargo carrying capacity value whenever there are fewer
passengers in the vehicle than there are safety belt-equipped seating
positions. In its comments, RVIA suggested alternative labels to avoid
this confusion and permit consumers to arrive at a more accurate load
carrying capacity value for their particular loading situation.
In response to the comments, NHTSA notes that its proposed
definition for OCW intended to capture the maximum OCW for a motor
home, ensuring that a vehicle with maximum occupants would not be
overloaded. NHTSA
[[Page 68448]]
envisioned that consumers would use the information on the label to
determine the amount of additional cargo carrying capacity that exists
when fewer than maximum occupants are transported. In this rulemaking,
NHTSA used an occupant weight of 68 kg (150 pounds), as it is a value
currently used throughout the FMVSS. The selection of a new, different
value would require research.
As discussed in the section on label content and format, in this
final rule, NHTSA adopts labels that display the total, maximum weight
allotted for occupants and cargo. Adoption of the abbreviated format
(that displays the total, maximum weight for occupants plus cargo)
supersedes the need to define individually OCW or the standard weight
of an occupant. The abbreviated format, as suggested by RVIA, permits
consumers to get maximum use of their available load carrying capacity
as the weights of occupants and cargo (including on-board water) are
based on actual quantities. In addition, it permits manufacturers to
state their actual load carrying capacity for occupants and cargo
instead of understating the cargo carrying capacity value.
E. Location of Labels
1. NPRM--To promote a consistent label location, which may increase
the number of times consumers see the label and thus increase label
effectiveness, in the NPRM, we proposed that the label be affixed to
the interior of the forward-most exterior passenger door on the right
side of the vehicle and be visible. Such a door is used repeatedly when
entering, exiting, and loading the vehicle. In addition, such a door
will have the surface area to accommodate the size of the required
label.
2. Revised RV Load Carrying Capacity Labels--In its comments, the
RVIA suggested a revised labeling format that would require each RV to
have information in three locations: (1) An abbreviated label in
locations similar to those specified for tire information under FMVSS
Nos. 110 and 120; (2) a more detailed label that would be placed on the
inside of a prominent cabinet door in the living quarters of the
vehicle; and (3) information in the vehicle owner's manual.
NHTSA agrees, in part, with the revised format suggested by RVIA.
NHTSA believes that the most important time for RV purchasers occurs at
the point-of-sale. Those who are not exposed to the correct load
carrying capacity information and those who see the load carrying
capacity information but do not understand it could follow through with
their purchase uninformed of the vehicle's load carrying capacity. It
is not until after the vehicle is purchased and in use that overloading
issues are realized. Then, consumers may experience unexplained control
problems, premature tire wear, tire blowouts, rim failures, suspension
component failures, and other issues. For these reasons, NHTSA remains
in favor of a single label requirement providing concise information in
a prominent location on the vehicle. Based on comments to the NPRM, in
this final rule, NHTSA will supplement the RVIA's suggested abbreviated
label with additional information, and will make them the only labels
required.
3. Label Locations for Heavy RVs and All Light Vehicles--In the
NPRM, NHTSA proposed that the CCC labels be affixed to the interior of
the forward-most exterior passenger door on the right side of the
vehicle. NHTSA stated its belief that such a door will be heavily used
while loading cargo giving the label maximum exposure. Also, since such
a location is not crowded with other labels, the CCC labels would be
more recognizable and would have a higher probability of being noticed
by the consumer during the sale of the vehicle.
Walker commented that the CCC label should be placed in a location
similar to the ``sticker'' label placed uniformly on a conspicuous
window on new cars. Then a permanent label could be placed in a
prominent location elsewhere on the vehicle. He also commented that RV
sale documents should have a required acknowledgement referencing the
aspects of weight, overloading and add-ons. NHTSA notes that the
location recommended by Walker is already the location for information
required by the Automobile Information Disclosure Act (AIDA) (15 U.S.C.
1231-1233). Adding the CCC label to the AIDA location could confuse
potential customers with additional information that is not related to
AIDA requirements. Matters involving RV sales documents are subject to
State law, and are outside the scope of this rulemaking.
RVDA asked NHTSA to provide RV manufacturers with reasonable
flexibility in label placement. RVDA stated that RV floor plans for
motorized RVs and travel trailers vary widely. Some motorized RVs do
not have driver-side or passenger-side front doors that enter into the
living quarters of the vehicle. In some RVs, occupants enter from the
back and in others, occupants enter from the front door to the cab
area. RVDA further stated that some RVs have extensive trim packages
covering the door while others have glass doors and screen doors where
the labels would be placed. RVDA said that in most situations the label
would likely be located in the middle of the living room/kitchen which
may result in the consumer removing it or covering it up.
RVIA had comments similar to those from RVDA. RVIA commented that
NHTSA's proposed requirement would mean that most RVs would have a
large, technical, aesthetically displeasing, stick-on label in the
midst of the owner's living quarters. RVIA also commented that the
proposed label location fails to take Type C and Type B motor homes
into consideration. For instance, Type C motor homes are typically
built on a modified truck chassis and Type B motor homes are typically
built on a full sized van chassis. For such vehicles, the forward-most
exterior passenger door on the right side of the vehicle is the typical
vehicle style door providing access to the front passenger seat. RVIA
stated that given the presence of arm rests, map compartments, beverage
holders, speakers, windows and window controls, it may be difficult to
find a place that will accommodate the label on the tens of thousands
of Type C and B motor homes built each year.
NHTSA believes that in order to be as effective as possible, the
label must be seen by the consumer during the sale of the vehicle, and
that the label would be more visible in the location specified in the
NPRM than it would be on the ``B'' pillar, on the inside of a cabinet
door or in the vehicle owner's manual. If, due to aesthetics, the
specified location \8\ results in the label looking intrusive, the
label will stand out to consumers. Since the information on the label
specified in this final rule is more concise than that specified in the
NPRM, the label is potentially physically smaller and should not
present as much of an aesthetic problem as the label proposed in the
NPRM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For the purposes of this document, ``specified location''
means the interior of the forward-most exterior passenger door on
the right side of the vehicle.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If there are two doors installed in the same location, the
temporary or permanent load carrying capacity label must be affixed to
the inside of the innermost door. For example, many RVs have an inner
screen door and outer solid door hinged in the same location. The doors
can be used individually or can be latched together and used as a
single door. The label must be affixed to the inside solid portion of
the inner screen door so it will be visible at all times. If it were
placed on the inside of the solid door, the label could be hidden
[[Page 68449]]
when the doors are latched together or would be viewed through
screening. On Type B and Type C motor homes, the temporary or permanent
load carrying capacity label will be placed on the inside of the
passenger door to the cab of the vehicle.
Therefore, this final rule specifies the same location as that
proposed in the NPRM (interior of the forward-most exterior passenger
door on the right side of the vehicle). It should be noted, however, if
there are two doors installed in the same location, the temporary or
permanent load carrying capacity label must be affixed to the inside of
the inner-most door. For example, many RVs have an inner screen door
and outer solid door hinged in the same location. The doors can be used
individually or can be latched together and used as a single door. The
label must be affixed to the inside solid portion of the inner screen
door so it will be visible at all times. If it were placed on the
inside of the solid door, the label could be hidden when the doors are
latched together or would be viewed through screening. On Type B and
Type C motor homes, the temporary or permanent load carrying capacity
label will be placed on the inside of the passenger door to the cab of
the vehicle. Also, if no doors exist on the right side of the vehicle,
the permanent or temporary load carrying capacity label will be placed
on the inside of the inner door on the rear of the vehicle.
However, in order to provide flexibility in situations where this
location may create a label that is overly obtrusive for vehicle users,
in this final rule, NHTSA permits manufacturers the option of placing a
temporary label in the specified location and applying an identical
permanent label in the area of the vehicle specified by FMVSS Nos. 110
and 120 for tire information. This approach places the information in a
prominent location during the sale of the RV yet allows the label to be
removed by the consumer after purchase if aesthetically displeasing. In
such cases, an identical label will remain permanently affixed in the
same area specified for tire information.
NMMA recommended a ``Plain English'' Guide that explains this final
rule's labeling requirements to manufacturers and dealers. Appendix A
of this final rule (following the final rule regulatory text)
summarizes the label requirements for various vehicle/GVWR
combinations.
4. Location of the FMVSS No. 110 Load Carrying Capacity
Modification Label--The Alliance noted that the NPRM provisions would
require the load carrying capacity modification label to be placed
within 25 mm of the tire placard when the load carrying capacity
modification label is used to correct load carrying capacity
information. It requested that in cases where there is no room for the
load carrying capacity modification label within 25 mm of the tire
placard, that the rule allow the load carrying capacity modification
label to be placed in any location allotted for the tire placard. In
such cases, a small label near the tire placard could refer the
consumer to the other location.
In this final rule NHTSA has clarified that the tire placard, as
well as other sources of load carrying capacity information may be
corrected by replacing/modifying existing labels or adding the load
carrying capacity modification label within 25 mm of the tire placard
or original labeling. There are many location alternatives offered by
FMVSS No. 110 at S4.3 for tire placard placement.\9\ It is suggested
that a location be selected where there is room for placement of the
load carrying capacity modification label within 25 mm if necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ S4.3 Placard of FMVSS No. 110 states in part: ``Each vehicle
* * * shall show the information specified * * * on a placard
permanently affixed to the driver's side B-pillar. In each vehicle
without a driver's side B-pillar and with two doors on the driver's
side of the vehicle opening in opposite directions, the placard
shall be affixed on the forward edge of the rear side door. If the
above locations do not permit the affixing of a placard that is
legible, visible and prominent, the placard shall be permanently
affixed to the rear edge of the driver's side door. If this location
does not permit the affixing of a placard that is legible, visible
and prominent, the placard shall be affixed to the inward facing
surface of the vehicle next to the driver's seating position. * *
*''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For example, the manufacturer of a light RV that applies a
temporary OCCC or RV trailer CCC label in the specified location
(visible on the interior of the forward-most exterior passenger door on
the right side of the vehicle) knows that there must be room within 25
mm of the tire placard for two labels. One is a permanent RV trailer or
motor home supplemental label which will be installed by the
manufacturer itself. The other is a permanent load carrying capacity
modification label that may have to be installed by the dealer or
service facility if the added weight threshold is exceeded. Therefore,
the vehicle placard should be placed in an area of the ``B'' pillar
where there is room for these labels. If the manufacturer of the light
RV is placing a permanent OCCC or RV trailer CCC label in the specified
location, then it is only required to assure that there is room for a
possible load carrying capacity modification label within 25 mm of the
tire placard in case it must be applied by the dealer or service
facility if the added weight threshold is exceeded. If there is no room
for the dealer to apply a modification label near the placard, then the
placard must be modified or replaced. NHTSA declines to permit non-
substantive labels that only direct consumers to the location of other
labels.
F. Label Format and Content
1. NPRM--In the NPRM, we stated that we seek to provide purchasers
of motor homes and travel trailers with information about the vehicles'
CCC. NHTSA stated its belief that the labels should also provide
consumers with a detailed explanation of how the CCC is calculated,
thus enabling each consumer to adjust the values according to their
particular applications. For example, if there are only two occupants
riding in a motor home designed for six occupants, there would be more
capacity for cargo. NHTSA proposed a label similar to the RVIA label
that is currently voluntarily used by many companies. Although RVIA
requires its labels on all member-manufactured RVs, in the NPRM, NHTSA
proposed labels only for heavy RVs as it believed, at the time, that
these heavier vehicles were more susceptible to overloading.
NHTSA also stated its belief that the proposed label formats have
information consumers can use while comparison shopping for motor homes
or travel trailers. The labels would also serve as a reference to
recreational vehicle owners when the owners are loading cargo.
NHTSA proposed that the label for travel trailers would include the
trailer tongue load rating and the statement: ``The weight of cargo
should never exceed XXX kilograms (XXX pounds)'' in black lettering on
yellow background. The travel trailer manufacturer would be responsible
for determining the trailer tongue load rating and the cargo carrying
capacity of its travel trailer, and for providing this information on
its travel trailer label.
NHTSA proposed that the label for motor homes would include the
statement: ``The combined weight of occupants and cargo should never
exceed XXX kilograms (XXX pounds)'' in black lettering on yellow
background. This statement is the same as that required for vehicles
with GVWRs of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less under the
required FMVSS No. 110 vehicle placard, which became effective on
September 1, 2005. The motor home manufacturer would be responsible for
determining the cargo carrying capacity of its motor home, and for
providing
[[Page 68450]]
this information on its motor home label.
All information on each of the proposed motor home and travel
trailer labels would be required to be a minimum print size of 2.4
millimeters (\3/32\ inches) high and be printed on a contrasting
background. The weights on the label would be required to be displayed
to the nearest kilogram (with conversion to the nearest pound in
parentheses) and must reflect the particular weight specifications of
the motor home or travel trailer to which it is affixed as the vehicle
leaves the factory.
It was proposed that both labels advise the purchaser that the
weight of any dealer-installed equipment must be subtracted from the
manufacturer's value of CCC and advise consumers to load cargo
appropriately to prevent non-uniform side-to-side and forward-aft
loading. In the case of motor homes, it was proposed that the label
contain the weight of the maximum hitch load and the advice that the
``tongue weight'' of trailers or vehicles being towed also subtracts
from the manufacturer's value of CCC. If the motor home was not
delivered with a hitch, this block would be left blank.
NHTSA did not propose that the label refer to the owner's manual,
but did not propose to prohibit manufacturers from adding references on
the label that refer to specific information included in the owner's
manual.
2. Revised RV Load Carrying Capacity Labels--In its comments to the
NPRM, RVIA suggested a revised labeling format that would require
varied information in three locations. RVIA's suggested format would
require each RV to have an abbreviated label, a more detailed label and
information in the vehicle owner's manual. Under the RVIA revised
format, an abbreviated label would appear on each motorized a