Silicomanganese From India, Kazakhstan, and Venezuela, 67965 [E7-23353]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 231 / Monday, December 3, 2007 / Notices
production facilities used for other
products and the use, cost, or
availability of major inputs into
production); and factors related to the
ability to shift supply among different
national markets (including barriers to
importation in foreign markets or
changes in market demand abroad).
Demand conditions to consider include
end uses and applications; the existence
and availability of substitute products;
and the level of competition among the
Domestic Like Product produced in the
United States, Subject Merchandise
produced in each Subject Country, and
such merchandise from other countries.
(11) (OPTIONAL) A statement of
whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product
and Domestic Industry; if you disagree
with either or both of these definitions,
please explain why and provide
alternative definitions.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these reviews to the
Secretary of Commerce on November
28, 2007. The views of the Commission
are contained in USITC Publication
3963 (November 2007), entitled
Silicomanganese From India,
Kazakhstan, and Venezuela:
Investigation Nos. 731–TA–929–931
(Review).
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission’s rules.
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—IMS Global Learning
Consortium, Inc.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 26, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–23226 Filed 11–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–929–931
(Review)]
Silicomanganese From India,
Kazakhstan, and Venezuela
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on silicomanganese from India,
Kazakhstan, and Venezuela would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on April 2, 2007 (72 FR 15726)
and determined on July 6, 2007 that it
would conduct expedited reviews (72
FR 52581, September 14, 2007).
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR § 207.2(f)).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Nov 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 28, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–23353 Filed 11–30–07; 8:45 am]
67965
Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR
55283).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on August 7, 2007. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the
Act on September 11, 2007 (72 FR
51840).
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 07–5898 Filed 11–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
[TA–W–62,243]
Notice is hereby given that, on
October 18, 2007, pursuant to section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301, et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), IMS
Global Learning Consortium, Inc. has
filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Icodeon Ltd., Cambridge,
UNITED KINGDOM; Korea Education &
Research Information Service (KERIS),
Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; National
Association of College Stores (NACS),
Oberlin, OH; TIDIA Ae FAPESP Project,
Sao Paulo, BRAZIL; and UOC—
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya,
Barcelona, SPAIN have been added as
parties to this venture. Also, Apple
Computer, Cupertino, CA has
withdrawn as a party to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and IMS Global
Learning Consortium, Inc. intends to file
additional written notifications
disclosing all changes in membership.
On April 7, 2000, IMS Global
Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its
original notification pursuant to section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Electric Mobility Corporation; Sewell,
NJ; Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated November 19,
2007, the petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department of Labor’s Notice of
Negative Determination Regarding
Eligibility to Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance, applicable to
workers and former workers of the
subject firm. The denial notice was
signed on November 1, 2007 and
published in the Federal Register on
November 15, 2007 (72 FR 64247).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
finding that the subject firm did not
separate or threaten to separate a
significant number or proportion of
workers as required by Section 222 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner provided additional
information regarding the subject firm’s
employment.
The Department has reviewed the
workers’ request for reconsideration and
the existing record, and has determined
that an administrative review is
appropriate. Therefore, the Department
will conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. The application
is, therefore, granted.
E:\FR\FM\03DEN1.SGM
03DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 231 (Monday, December 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 67965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23353]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-929-931 (Review)]
Silicomanganese From India, Kazakhstan, and Venezuela
Determinations
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission)
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on
silicomanganese from India, Kazakhstan, and Venezuela would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry
in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Sec. 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission instituted these reviews on April 2, 2007 (72 FR
15726) and determined on July 6, 2007 that it would conduct expedited
reviews (72 FR 52581, September 14, 2007).
The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to
the Secretary of Commerce on November 28, 2007. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3963 (November 2007),
entitled Silicomanganese From India, Kazakhstan, and Venezuela:
Investigation Nos. 731-TA-929-931 (Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 28, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-23353 Filed 11-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
