Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements, 66026-66028 [E7-22880]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
66026
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 226 / Monday, November 26, 2007 / Notices
provide an opportunity for involvement
by participating agencies and the public
to help define the purpose and need for
a proposed project, as well as the range
of alternatives for consideration in the
EIS; and (3) establish a plan for
coordinating public and agency
participation in, and comment on, the
environmental review process. An
invitation to become a participating or
cooperating agency, with scoping
materials appended, will be extended to
other Federal and non-Federal agencies
and Native American tribes that may
have an interest in the proposed project.
It is possible that FTA and UTA will not
be able to identify all Federal and nonFederal agencies and Native American
tribes that may have such an interest.
Any Federal or non-Federal agency or
Native American tribe interested in the
proposed project that does not receive
an invitation to become a participating
agency should notify the Project
Manager identified above under
ADDRESSES at the earliest opportunity.
UTA is seeking federal assistance
from the FTA to fund the proposed
project under 49 United States Code
5309 and will, therefore, be subject to
regulations (49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 611) related to
New Starts projects.
The EIS will be prepared in
accordance with NEPA and its
implementing regulation issued by the
Council on Environmental Quality (40
CFR Parts 1500–1508) and with the
FTA/Federal Highway Administration
regulations ‘‘Environmental Impact and
Related Procedures’’ (23 CFR part 771).
In accordance with 23 CFR 771.105(a)
and 771.133, FTA will comply with all
Federal environmental laws,
regulations, and executive orders
applicable to the proposed project
during the environmental review
process to the maximum extent
practicable. These requirements
include, but are not limited to, the
environmental and public hearing
provisions of Federal transit laws (49
U.S.C. 5301(e), 5323(b), and 5324); the
project-level air quality conformity
regulation of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) (40 CFR part
93); The section 404(b)(1) guidelines of
EPA (40 CFR part 230); the regulation
implementing section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act (36
CFR Part 800); the regulation
implementing section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (50 CFR part
402); Section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act (23 CFR 771.135);
and Executive Orders 12898 on
environmental justice, 11988 on
floodplain management, and 11990 on
wetlands.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:03 Nov 23, 2007
Jkt 214001
Issued on: November 14, 2007.
Charmaine Knighton,
FTA Deputy Regional Administrator, Region
VIII.
[FR Doc. E7–22913 Filed 11–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2007–0039]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed revision of the previously
approved collection of information,
OMB # 2127–0646.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatements of previously approved
collections.
This document describes the
collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to U.S. Department of Transportation
Dockets, 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Docket No.
NHTSA–2007–0039
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Siegler, Ph.D., Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative, Office of
Behavioral Safety Research (NTI–132),
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave,
SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must publish a document in
the Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulations (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following:
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) how to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) how to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, and or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks public
comment on the following proposed
revision of the previously approved
collection of information, OMB # 2127–
0646:
Evaluation Surveys for Impaired
Driving and Seat Belt Interventions
Type of Request—Revision of the
previously approved collection of
information.
OMB Clearance Number: 2127–0646.
Form Number: NHTSA1010.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval—3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information—The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
proposes to conduct telephone surveys
to evaluate interventions designed to
increase seat belt use and reduce
impaired driving. Sample sizes would
range from 200 to 2000 depending on
the geographic unit being surveyed
(Nation, Region, State, Community) and
the evaluation design for the
intervention (e.g., number of analytic
groups). Interview length would be 10
minutes. The surveys would collect
information on attitudes, awareness,
knowledge, and behavior related to the
intervention. The surveys would follow
a pre-post design where they are
administered prior to the
implementation of the intervention and
after its conclusion. Interim survey
waves may also be administered if the
duration of the intervention permits.
In conducting the proposed surveys,
the interviewers would use computerassisted telephone interviewing to
reduce interview length and minimize
recording errors. A Spanish Language
translation and bilingual interviewers
would be used to minimize language
E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM
26NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 226 / Monday, November 26, 2007 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
barriers to participation. The proposed
surveys would be anonymous.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information
The National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) was
established to reduce the mounting
number of deaths, injuries, and
economic losses resulting from motor
vehicle crashes on the Nation’s
highways. As part of this statutory
mandate, NHTSA is authorized to
conduct research as a foundation for the
development of motor vehicle standards
and traffic safety programs.
The heavy toll that impaired driving
exacts on the nation, in fatalities,
injuries, and economic costs, is well
documented. Strong documentation also
exists to show that wearing a seat belt
is one of the most important actions a
person can take to prevent injury or
fatality in the event of a crash, but a
significant proportion of the population
still does not wear them. The
persistence of these traffic safety
problems points to a continuing need
for effective interventions to address
impaired driving and non-use of safety
belts. This in turn calls for strong
evaluation efforts to identify what
interventions are effective. This
includes monitoring key interventions
that have been shown to be effective in
order to determine whether they are
retaining their potency, as well as
identifying new or refined interventions
that may influence parts of the
population that have been resistant to
previous measures.
Over the next few years, a number of
legislative and programmatic changes
will require NHTSA to collect public
awareness information about its
programs. Under section 410 of
SAFETEA–LU, spending for State
enforcement grants for impaired driving
programs will increase almost 100
million dollars annually, from 39.6
million in 2005 to $139 million in 2009.
States seeking to access these grants for
specific impaired driving activities will
need to have implemented a number of
programs in order to be eligible for these
grants including; statewide checkpoints
and/or saturation patrols, prosecution/
adjudication outreach, increased BAC
testing of drivers in fatal crashes, high
BAC law (stronger/additional penalties),
effective alcohol rehabilitation and/or
DWI courts, under age 21 program,
administrative license revocation or
suspension, and self-sustaining
programs.
Under Section 406 of SAFETEA–LU,
incentive grants to encourage States to
enactment and enforce primary seat belt
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:03 Nov 23, 2007
Jkt 214001
laws were $124.5 million per year
between 2006 and 2009. States were
eligible for these grants if they passed a
primary seat belt law, or achieved a
state seat belt use rate of 85% for two
consecutive years after passing a
primary law. Under Section 405 of
SAFETEA–LU, incentive grants to
encourage States to adopt and
implement effective programs to reduce
deaths and injuries from riding
unrestrained or improperly restrained in
motor vehicles increased from $19.84
million annually in 2005 to $25 million
annually in 2006 and through 2009.
States can only use these grant funds to
implement and enforce occupant
protection programs.
It is expected that such heightened
activity will increase drivers’ awareness
of these programs and reduce incidents
of impaired driving and unrestrained or
improperly restrained driving. Public
awareness surveys would enable
NHTSA to evaluate the effectiveness of
this increased spending.
Between 2006 and 2009, SAFETEA–
LU has authorized NHTSA to spend $29
million annually on National media to
promote a message of high visibility
enforcement for both impaired driving
and occupant protection programs. This
requires NHTSA to examine public
awareness of programs to determine
whether the media messages are
reaching the target audience.
In order to reduce the work
requirements for each State and to
create sets of survey data that may be
compared among the States, NHTSA
will grant one or more separate awards
to survey firms with expertise in
conducting random telephone surveys.
The data will be used to properly plan
and evaluate enforcement activities
directed at reducing the occurrence of
alcohol impaired driving and increasing
the use of safety belts. Data from
National surveys will be used to assess
the overall effectiveness of these
programs, while State data will assess
effectiveness of individual State
programs. States found to have
implemented effective programs to
reduce their impaired driving problem,
and increased their seat belt use, will
prepare materials that highlight major
features of their programs to be
disseminated among States that want to
implement an improved alcohol
enforcement program or occupant
protection enforcement program.
It should be noted that during the past
decade NHTSA has conducted surveys
on attitudes and behaviors on impaired
driving and seat belt use. These surveys
were very useful in documenting
effective programs that have increased
awareness of occupant protection and
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66027
impaired driving issues. Most of these
surveys were conducted years ago and
cannot be used to evaluate new
programs scheduled to be initiated in
the next few years.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information)
Over the next 3 years, NHTSA intends
to conduct National telephone surveys
to collect data from a total of 28,000
participants. For the impaired driving
programs, 2 sets of pre/post intervention
surveys, each with sample sizes of 1200,
will be administered annually for 3
years. For the Occupant Protection
programs, 2 sets of pre/post intervention
surveys, each with sample sizes of 1200,
will be administered annually for 3
years. NHTSA may also select certain
sub-groups to survey, including State,
Regional, and Community telephone
surveys to monitor and evaluate
occupant protection and impaired
driving demonstration projects.
Typically, a State demonstration survey
will require 500 participants. A regional
demonstration survey can range from as
few as 200 participants for a small
county to 2000 participants for a region
covering more than one State.
Interviews will be conducted with
persons at residential phone numbers
selected using random digit dialing. No
more than one respondent per
household will be selected, and each
sample member will complete just one
interview. Businesses are ineligible for
the sample and would not be
interviewed. After each wave is
completed and the data analyzed, the
findings will be disseminated to each
State for review.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting
and Record Keeping Burden Resulting
from the Collection of Information
NHTSA estimates that respondents in
the sample would require an average of
10 minutes to complete the telephone
interviews. Thus, the number of annual
estimated reporting burden on the
general public would be 1,600 hours for
the National surveys and a maximum of
2,800 hours for the State and regional
demonstration surveys, or a maximum
of 4,400 hours per year for the combined
National, State, and regional surveys.
The respondents would not incur any
reporting or record keeping costs from
the information collection.
E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM
26NON1
66028
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 226 / Monday, November 26, 2007 / Notices
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Marilena Amoni,
Associate Administrator for Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. E7–22880 Filed 11–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2007–0020, Notice 1]
Ferrari S.p.A. and Ferrari North
America; Receipt of Application for a
Temporary Exemption From the
Advanced Air Bag Requirements of
FMVSS No. 208
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for
temporary exemption from provisions of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 208, Occupant Crash
Protection.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
procedures in 49 CFR Part 555, Ferrari
S.P.A. and Ferrari North America
(collectively, ‘‘Ferrari’’) have petitioned
the agency for a temporary exemption
from certain advanced air bag
requirements of FMVSS No. 208. The
basis for the application is that
compliance would cause substantial
economic hardship to a manufacturer
that has tried in good faith to comply
with the standard.
This notice of receipt of an
application for temporary exemption is
published in accordance with the
statutory provisions of 49 U.S.C.
30113(b)(2). NHTSA has made no
judgment on the merits of the
application.
You should submit your
comments not later than December 26,
2007.
Comments: We invite you to submit
comments on the application described
above. You may submit comments
identified by docket number at the
heading of this notice by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: DOT Docket Management
Facility, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:03 Nov 23, 2007
Jkt 214001
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 1–(202)–493–2251
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number or Regulatory Identification
Number (RIN) for this rulemaking. Note
that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket in
order to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.reglulations.gov, at any time or to
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal Holidays.
Confidential Business Information: If
you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit three copies of your
complete submission, including the
information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief
Counsel, NHTSA, at the address given
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. In addition, you should
submit two copies, from which you
have deleted the claimed confidential
business information, to Docket
Management at the address given above.
When you send a comment containing
information claimed to be confidential
business information, you should
include a cover letter setting forth the
information specified in our
confidential business information
regulation (49 CFR Part 512).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ari Scott, Office of the Chief Counsel,
NCC–112, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone: (202) 366–2992; Fax: (202)
366–3820.
Discussion
I. Advanced Air Bag Requirements and
Small Volume Manufacturers
In 2000, NHTSA upgraded the
requirements for air bags in passenger
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
cars and light trucks, requiring what are
commonly known as ‘‘advanced air
bags.’’ 1 The upgrade was designed to
meet the goals of improving protection
for occupants of all sizes, belted and
unbelted, in moderate-to-high-speed
crashes, and of minimizing the risks
posed by air bags to infants, children,
and other occupants, especially in lowspeed crashes.
The advanced air bag requirements
were a culmination of a comprehensive
plan that the agency announced in 1996
to address the adverse effects of air bags.
This plan also included an extensive
consumer education program to
encourage the placement of children in
rear seats. The new requirements were
phased in beginning with the 2004
model year.
Small volume manufacturers were not
subject to the advanced air bag
requirements until September 1, 2006,
but their efforts to bring their respective
vehicles into compliance with these
requirements began several years earlier.
However, because the new requirements
were challenging, major air bag
suppliers concentrated their efforts on
working with large volume
manufacturers, and thus, until recently,
small volume manufacturers had
limited access to advanced air bag
technology. Because of the nature of the
requirements for protecting out-ofposition occupants, ‘‘off-the-shelf’’
systems could not be readily adopted.
Further complicating matters, because
small volume manufacturers build so
few vehicles, the costs of developing
custom advanced air bag systems
compared to potential profits
discouraged some air bag suppliers from
working with small volume
manufacturers.
As always, we are concerned about
the potential safety implication of any
temporary exemptions granted by this
agency. In the present case, we are
seeking comments on a petition for an
extension of a temporary exemption
from the advanced air bag requirements
submitted by a manufacturer of highperformance sports cars.
II. Overview of Petition for Economic
Hardship Exemption
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 30113
and the procedures in 49 CFR Part 555,
Ferrari has petitioned the agency for an
extension of a temporary exemption
from certain advanced air bag
requirements of FMVSS No. 208. The
basis for the application is that
compliance would cause substantial
economic hardship to a manufacturer
that has tried in good faith to comply
1 See
E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM
65 FR 30680 (May 12, 2000).
26NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 226 (Monday, November 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66026-66028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22880]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2007-0039]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed revision of the
previously approved collection of information, OMB 2127-0646.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections.
This document describes the collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to U.S. Department of
Transportation Dockets, 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Docket No. NHTSA-2007-0039
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Siegler, Ph.D., Contracting
Officer's Technical Representative, Office of Behavioral Safety
Research (NTI-132), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) how to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, and or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on
the following proposed revision of the previously approved collection
of information, OMB 2127-0646:
Evaluation Surveys for Impaired Driving and Seat Belt Interventions
Type of Request--Revision of the previously approved collection of
information.
OMB Clearance Number: 2127-0646.
Form Number: NHTSA1010.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval--3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of Information--The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposes to conduct telephone
surveys to evaluate interventions designed to increase seat belt use
and reduce impaired driving. Sample sizes would range from 200 to 2000
depending on the geographic unit being surveyed (Nation, Region, State,
Community) and the evaluation design for the intervention (e.g., number
of analytic groups). Interview length would be 10 minutes. The surveys
would collect information on attitudes, awareness, knowledge, and
behavior related to the intervention. The surveys would follow a pre-
post design where they are administered prior to the implementation of
the intervention and after its conclusion. Interim survey waves may
also be administered if the duration of the intervention permits.
In conducting the proposed surveys, the interviewers would use
computer-assisted telephone interviewing to reduce interview length and
minimize recording errors. A Spanish Language translation and bilingual
interviewers would be used to minimize language
[[Page 66027]]
barriers to participation. The proposed surveys would be anonymous.
Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) was
established to reduce the mounting number of deaths, injuries, and
economic losses resulting from motor vehicle crashes on the Nation's
highways. As part of this statutory mandate, NHTSA is authorized to
conduct research as a foundation for the development of motor vehicle
standards and traffic safety programs.
The heavy toll that impaired driving exacts on the nation, in
fatalities, injuries, and economic costs, is well documented. Strong
documentation also exists to show that wearing a seat belt is one of
the most important actions a person can take to prevent injury or
fatality in the event of a crash, but a significant proportion of the
population still does not wear them. The persistence of these traffic
safety problems points to a continuing need for effective interventions
to address impaired driving and non-use of safety belts. This in turn
calls for strong evaluation efforts to identify what interventions are
effective. This includes monitoring key interventions that have been
shown to be effective in order to determine whether they are retaining
their potency, as well as identifying new or refined interventions that
may influence parts of the population that have been resistant to
previous measures.
Over the next few years, a number of legislative and programmatic
changes will require NHTSA to collect public awareness information
about its programs. Under section 410 of SAFETEA-LU, spending for State
enforcement grants for impaired driving programs will increase almost
100 million dollars annually, from 39.6 million in 2005 to $139 million
in 2009. States seeking to access these grants for specific impaired
driving activities will need to have implemented a number of programs
in order to be eligible for these grants including; statewide
checkpoints and/or saturation patrols, prosecution/adjudication
outreach, increased BAC testing of drivers in fatal crashes, high BAC
law (stronger/additional penalties), effective alcohol rehabilitation
and/or DWI courts, under age 21 program, administrative license
revocation or suspension, and self-sustaining programs.
Under Section 406 of SAFETEA-LU, incentive grants to encourage
States to enactment and enforce primary seat belt laws were $124.5
million per year between 2006 and 2009. States were eligible for these
grants if they passed a primary seat belt law, or achieved a state seat
belt use rate of 85% for two consecutive years after passing a primary
law. Under Section 405 of SAFETEA-LU, incentive grants to encourage
States to adopt and implement effective programs to reduce deaths and
injuries from riding unrestrained or improperly restrained in motor
vehicles increased from $19.84 million annually in 2005 to $25 million
annually in 2006 and through 2009. States can only use these grant
funds to implement and enforce occupant protection programs.
It is expected that such heightened activity will increase drivers'
awareness of these programs and reduce incidents of impaired driving
and unrestrained or improperly restrained driving. Public awareness
surveys would enable NHTSA to evaluate the effectiveness of this
increased spending.
Between 2006 and 2009, SAFETEA-LU has authorized NHTSA to spend $29
million annually on National media to promote a message of high
visibility enforcement for both impaired driving and occupant
protection programs. This requires NHTSA to examine public awareness of
programs to determine whether the media messages are reaching the
target audience.
In order to reduce the work requirements for each State and to
create sets of survey data that may be compared among the States, NHTSA
will grant one or more separate awards to survey firms with expertise
in conducting random telephone surveys. The data will be used to
properly plan and evaluate enforcement activities directed at reducing
the occurrence of alcohol impaired driving and increasing the use of
safety belts. Data from National surveys will be used to assess the
overall effectiveness of these programs, while State data will assess
effectiveness of individual State programs. States found to have
implemented effective programs to reduce their impaired driving
problem, and increased their seat belt use, will prepare materials that
highlight major features of their programs to be disseminated among
States that want to implement an improved alcohol enforcement program
or occupant protection enforcement program.
It should be noted that during the past decade NHTSA has conducted
surveys on attitudes and behaviors on impaired driving and seat belt
use. These surveys were very useful in documenting effective programs
that have increased awareness of occupant protection and impaired
driving issues. Most of these surveys were conducted years ago and
cannot be used to evaluate new programs scheduled to be initiated in
the next few years.
Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)
Over the next 3 years, NHTSA intends to conduct National telephone
surveys to collect data from a total of 28,000 participants. For the
impaired driving programs, 2 sets of pre/post intervention surveys,
each with sample sizes of 1200, will be administered annually for 3
years. For the Occupant Protection programs, 2 sets of pre/post
intervention surveys, each with sample sizes of 1200, will be
administered annually for 3 years. NHTSA may also select certain sub-
groups to survey, including State, Regional, and Community telephone
surveys to monitor and evaluate occupant protection and impaired
driving demonstration projects. Typically, a State demonstration survey
will require 500 participants. A regional demonstration survey can
range from as few as 200 participants for a small county to 2000
participants for a region covering more than one State.
Interviews will be conducted with persons at residential phone
numbers selected using random digit dialing. No more than one
respondent per household will be selected, and each sample member will
complete just one interview. Businesses are ineligible for the sample
and would not be interviewed. After each wave is completed and the data
analyzed, the findings will be disseminated to each State for review.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of Information
NHTSA estimates that respondents in the sample would require an
average of 10 minutes to complete the telephone interviews. Thus, the
number of annual estimated reporting burden on the general public would
be 1,600 hours for the National surveys and a maximum of 2,800 hours
for the State and regional demonstration surveys, or a maximum of 4,400
hours per year for the combined National, State, and regional surveys.
The respondents would not incur any reporting or record keeping costs
from the information collection.
[[Page 66028]]
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Marilena Amoni,
Associate Administrator for Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E7-22880 Filed 11-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P