Federal Records Management; Media Neutral Schedules, 64153-64155 [E7-22376]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 220 / Thursday, November 15, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Madisonville, St. Tammany Parish,
Louisiana. This deviation will test a
change to the drawbridge operation
schedule to determine whether a
permanent change to the schedule is
needed.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
November 15, 2007 until May 13, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(dpb), Eighth Coast Guard District, 500
Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana
70130–3310. The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the Bridge
Administration office between 7 a.m.
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phil
Johnson, Bridge Administration Branch,
telephone (504) 671–2128.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
evaluating this test schedule by
submitting comments and related
material. If you do so, please include
your name and address, identify the
docket number for this deviation
[CGD08–07–037], indicate the specific
section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason
for each comment. Please submit all
comments and related material in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying. If you
would like to know they reached us,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period. Comments
must be received by January 14, 2008.
Background and Purpose
The Louisiana Department of
Transportation and Development has
requested that the operating regulation
of the SR 22 swing span bridge, located
on the Tchefuncta River at mile 2.5 in
Madisonville, St. Tammany Parish,
Louisiana, be changed in order
accommodate the flow of vehicular
traffic at rush hour peaks. Currently, the
draw of the SR 22 Bridge in
Madisonville opens on signal, except
that, from 5 a.m. to 8 p.m., the draw
need open only on the hour and halfhour.
This Temporary Deviation from
Drawbridge Operating Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 Nov 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
allows the bridge to operate as follows:
The draw of the SR 22 Bridge, mile 2.5
at Madisonville, shall open on signal
from 7 p.m. to 6 a.m. From 6 a.m. to 7
p.m., the draw need only open on the
hour and half hour, except that, from 6
a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m.
Monday through Friday except Federal
holidays, the draw need only open on
the hour.
A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
[CGD08–07–38] is being issued in
conjunction with this Temporary
Deviation to obtain public comments.
The Coast Guard will evaluate public
comments from this Temporary
Deviation and the above referenced
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
determine if a permanent special
drawbridge operating regulation is
warranted.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: November 6, 2007.
David M. Frank,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–22366 Filed 11–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
36 CFR Part 1228
[FDMS Docket NARA–07–0004]
RIN 3095–AB43
Federal Records Management; Media
Neutral Schedules
National Archives and Records
Administration
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA) is
revising its regulations on scheduling
Federal records to make future records
schedules and certain existing approved
records schedules applicable to series of
records regardless of the medium in
which the records are created and
maintained. Both the agency (in
submitting the schedule) and NARA (in
approving the schedule) would be able
to specify that certain disposition
authorities are valid only for the current
media/format of the records. Although
agencies currently are permitted to
submit ‘‘media-neutral’’ records
schedules, most existing records
schedules were developed for hard-copy
(usually paper) recordkeeping systems
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64153
and do not state that they apply to
records in other formats. Therefore,
agencies have been required to submit
new schedules when they convert from
a hard-copy system of records,
including special media records (such
as still pictures, aerial photography,
maps, charts, drawings, motion picture
film, analog videotape, and analog
sound recordings), to an electronic
system. This rule makes all new
schedules media neutral unless
otherwise specified and allows
schedules previously approved for hard
copy records to be applied to electronic
versions of the files if certain conditions
are met. The new rule will reduce the
workload for both agencies and NARA,
allowing them to focus resources on
critical records management needs.
DATES: This rule is effective December
17, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurence Brewer, Director, Life Cycle
Management Division, at 301–837–1539
or via fax at 301–837–3697.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 19, 2004, at 69 FR
67692, NARA published a proposed rule
making schedules media neutral. In
response, we received comments from
five Federal agencies and from a private
firm that does records management
work for Federal agencies. Four public
interest groups submitted comments on
a related proposed records disposition
schedule modifying the General Records
Schedules (GRS) to implement the
proposed rule insofar as the rule applies
to previously approved schedules. The
notice inviting public comment on the
proposed disposition schedule N1–
GRS–05–1 was published on November
16, 2004 (69 FR 67182). We considered
the comments on both the proposed rule
and the proposed disposition schedule
in developing this final rule.
Discussion of Comments Received on
the Proposed Rule
All five agencies and the consulting
firm generally endorsed NARA’s
proposals regarding media neutrality.
However, three of the agencies and the
consulting firm felt that the new
regulations should allow agencies more
than 45 days to notify NARA when they
convert previously scheduled
permanent records to an electronic
format. One of these agencies suggested
allowing agencies up to 90 days, while
another agency suggested that NARA
require annual updates. The third
agency that addressed this issue
suggested that the regulation require
notification ‘‘as soon as possible.’’ The
E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM
15NOR1
64154
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 220 / Thursday, November 15, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
consulting firm suggested that notifying
NARA be done as part of annual or
other periodic reviews conducted by
agency records managers to identify
new or modified recordkeeping systems.
NARA agrees that 45 days is probably
not sufficient. Consequently, the final
regulation allows agencies up to 90 days
to notify NARA when permanent
records are converted to an electronic
format.
One agency commented on the
wording in the regulation regarding
records maintained on agency web sites.
This agency thought the term ‘‘web
version,’’ which NARA used in the
proposed rule, was not sufficiently
clear. In response to this comment,
NARA has used the expression ‘‘copies
of records that are maintained on an
agency web site.’’ We believe that this
wording clarifies NARA’s intent.
The agency which commented on web
site records also questioned why the
proposed regulations did not allow
previously approved schedules to be
applied to temporary program records
with retention periods of 20 years or
more or to records containing
observational and social science raw
data. (The consulting firm which
submitted comments also questioned
these exclusions.) This agency suggested
instead that ‘‘the provisions for media
neutral schedules [in 36 CFR
1228.24(b)(3)] should be grandfathered
to include all previously approved
records schedules and not limited to
those approved after the final date of
this ruling.’’ We did not adopt either
suggestion. Based on our analysis of all
comments on the proposed rule and
disposition schedule, instead, the
regulations now allow retrospective
media neutrality for temporary program
records only when the records are
converted to scanned images or, in the
case of temporary audiovisual records,
from traditional media to any digital
format. This matter is addressed in more
detail in the following discussion of the
comments NARA received from several
public interest organizations.
Discussion of Comments Received on
the Disposition Schedule
Four public interest groups also
addressed NARA’s media neutral
proposals. These organizations did not
comment on the regulations directly but
provided comments on the NARAprepared disposition schedule
(Disposition Job N1–GRS–05–1) that
modified GRS 20 to reflect the proposed
regulations. Their comments on the
proposed GRS 20 revisions concerning
retrospective media neutrality as they
relate to the provisions of the proposed
rule are discussed below.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 Nov 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
None of the public interest groups
commented on NARA’s proposal to
make previously approved schedule
items media neutral in the case of
permanent records. However, all of
these groups were critical of
retrospective media neutrality as it
relates to temporary program records,
arguing that the enhanced search
capabilities and manipulability of
electronic records might increase the
value of records that were appropriately
temporary if maintained in paper form.
In their view, if the proposed GRS
modifications and regulations
pertaining to media neutrality were
implemented, records warranting
permanent retention or a longer
temporary retention period if
maintained electronically could be
destroyed without NARA review.
Both this final rule and the approved
schedule modifying GRS 20 now allow
for retrospective media neutrality for
temporary program records only if
records are converted to scanned images
in the case of textual records or to
digital media in the case of sound
recordings, moving images, and still
photography. We note that this action
reflects long-standing NARA policy on
conversion to scanned images. Since the
1990s, NARA has authorized agencies to
dispose of scanned images of temporary
hard copy records in accordance with
previously approved schedules so long
as the basic content and function of the
records remain the same.
While scanned images of hard copy
records can with proper indexing be
searched more easily than the original
documents, the information in the
records cannot be manipulated in the
same fashion as a database. It is this
manipulability that renders some
databases of historical value even if the
related paper records are temporary.
Hence, the final rule and the related
changes to GRS 20 now mandate the
submission of a new schedule to NARA
when an agency converts temporary
program records that are textual in
nature to an electronic format other than
scanned image. This will afford NARA
the opportunity to assess the value of
the electronic records to determine if
their manipulability renders them
potentially permanent. This
consideration, enhanced manipulability,
does not apply if an agency uses a
digital format for its still pictures or
other temporary audiovisual records. In
all instances, therefore, where an agency
converts temporary audiovisual records
to a digital format, the previously
approved retention period may be
applied.
The GRS and the regulations, as
initially proposed, would have allowed
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
agencies to apply retrospectively
previously approved schedules to
electronic systems that merge
information drawn from more than one
previously scheduled temporary record
series so long as the electronic records
are maintained for the longest retention
period specified in the previously
approved schedules. Two of the public
interest groups took issue with this,
arguing that electronic systems that
merge information from multiple hard
copy files are likely to be more valuable
than the component hard copy series
considered individually. NARA agrees
and has revised the final rule to allow
agencies to apply previously approved
schedules to electronic records drawn
from multiple temporary series only if
the records are housekeeping in nature
and are either covered by temporary
items in the GRS or by agency schedules
for administrative records. In the case of
temporary program records, agencies
must submit a new schedule if an
electronic system is drawn from
multiple previously scheduled series.
One public interest group commented
that NARA’s proposals did not take into
account that converting hard copy
records to an electronic format, by
decreasing storage costs and increasing
search capabilities and manipulability
might justify retaining the electronic
versions longer than the previously
approved hard copy documents. NARA
is well aware that how long temporary
records should be retained may change
over time, even absent a change in the
recordkeeping medium. NARA expects
agencies to re-evaluate their needs
periodically. If agencies determine that
a series of records warrants a longer
retention period for any reason, they
should submit a schedule to NARA.
Even though the General Records
Schedules are mandatory, agencies can
submit schedules requesting an
exception if the retention periods
specified in the GRS do not meet their
needs.
We have modified the provisions of
the proposed rule and the disposition
schedule to address the comments.
NARA published a notice for the revised
NARA-prepared disposition schedule
on August 9, 2007 (72 FR 44875), and
approved the schedule on September
26, 2007.
This rule is a significant regulatory
action for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and has been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget.
As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, I certify that this rule
will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because it affects Federal agencies. This
regulation does not have any federalism
E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM
15NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 220 / Thursday, November 15, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
implications. This rule is not a major
rule as defined in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 8,
Congressional Review of Agency
Rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1228
Archives and Records.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, NARA amends part 1228 of
title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 1228—DISPOSITION OF
FEDERAL RECORDS
1. The authority citation for part 1228
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 44 U.S.C. chs. 21, 29, and 33.
2. Amend § 1228.24 by redesignating
paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) as
paragraphs (b)(4) and (b)(5) respectively,
and adding new paragraph (b)(3) to read
as follows:
I
§ 1228.24 Formulation of agency records
schedules.
(b) * * *
(3) Records schedules submitted to
NARA for approval on or after [the
effective date of the final rule] are media
neutral, i.e., the disposition instructions
apply to the described records in all
media, unless the schedule identifies a
specific medium for a specific series.
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. Add § 1228.31 to read as follows:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
§ 1228. 31 Applying previously approved
schedules to electronic records.
(a) When must an agency submit a
new schedule for electronic versions of
previously scheduled hard copy
records? Agencies must submit a new
schedule to NARA for electronic
versions of previously scheduled
records if:
(1) The content and function of the
records have changed significantly (e.g.,
the electronic records contain
information that is substantially
different from the information included
in the hard copy series or are used for
different purposes).
(2) The previously approved schedule
explicitly excludes electronic records.
(3) The electronic records consist of
program records maintained on an
agency web site.
(4) The electronic records consist of
program records maintained in a format
other than scanned image AND the
previously approved schedule is not
media neutral.
(b) When can an agency apply a
previously approved schedule to
electronic versions of the records? If the
conditions specified in paragraph (a) of
this section do not apply, the conditions
in paragraph (b) apply:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 Nov 14, 2007
Jkt 214001
(1) Permanent records. (i) The agency
may apply a previously approved
schedule for hard copy records to
electronic versions of the permanent
records when the electronic records
system replaces a single series of hard
copy permanent records or the
electronic records consist of information
drawn from multiple previously
scheduled permanent series. Agencies
must notify NARA (NWM) in writing of
records that have been previously
scheduled as permanent in hard copy
form, including special media records as
described in 36 CFR 1228.266 and 36
CFR 1228.268. The notification must be
submitted within 90 days of when the
electronic recordkeeping system
becomes operational and must contain
the:
(A) Name of agency;
(B) Name of the electronic system;
(C) Organizational unit(s) or agency
program which records support;
(D) Current disposition authority
reference; and
(E) Format of the records (e.g.,
database, scanned images, digital
photographs, etc.).
(ii) If the electronic records include
information drawn from both temporary
and permanent hard copy series, an
agency either may apply a previously
approved permanent disposition
authority, after submitting the
notification required by paragraph
(b)(1)(i) or may submit a new schedule
if the agency believes the electronic
records do not warrant permanent
retention.
(2) Temporary still pictures, sound
recordings, motion picture film, and
video recordings. The agency must
apply the previously approved schedule
to digital versions. If changes in the
approved schedule are required, follow
§ 1228.32.
(3) Scanned images of temporary
records, including temporary program
records. The agency must apply the
previously approved schedule. If
changes in the approved schedule are
required, follow § 1228.32.
(4) Other temporary records
maintained in an electronic format
other than scanned images. (i) For
temporary records that are covered by
an item in a General Records Schedule
or an agency-specific schedule that
pertains to administrative/housekeeping
activities, apply the previously
approved schedule. If the electronic
records consist of information drawn
from multiple hard copy series, apply
the previously approved schedule item
with the longest retention period.
(ii) For temporary program records
covered by a NARA-approved media
neutral schedule item (i.e., the item
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64155
appears on a schedule approved before
December 17, 2007 that is explicitly
stated to be media neutral, or it appears
on any schedule approved on or after
December 17, 2007 that is not explicitly
limited to a specific recordkeeping
medium), apply the previously
approved schedule.
Dated: September 27, 2007.
Allen Weinstein,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. E7–22376 Filed 11–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 301, 3010, 3015 and 3020
[Docket No. RM2007–1; Order No. 43]
Administrative Practice and Procedure,
Postal Service; Correction
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Final rule; correction.
SUMMARY: The Postal Regulatory
Commission published a final rule in
the Federal Register of November 9,
2007 implementing certain provisions
in the Postal Accountability and
Enhancement Act. The effective date
should have read December 10, 2007,
rather than November 9, 2007.
The effective date for FR Doc.
E7–21596, published on November 9,
2007 (72 FR 63662) is corrected to
December 10, 2007.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 and
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
In the
Federal Register of November 9, 2007,
page 72 FR 63662, in the first column
in the ‘‘Dates’’ entry, correct the
reference ‘‘Effective date: November 9,
2007’’ to read ‘‘Effective date: December
10, 2007.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Steven W. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07–5683 Filed 11–9–07; 12:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–M
E:\FR\FM\15NOR1.SGM
15NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 220 (Thursday, November 15, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64153-64155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22376]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
36 CFR Part 1228
[FDMS Docket NARA-07-0004]
RIN 3095-AB43
Federal Records Management; Media Neutral Schedules
AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is
revising its regulations on scheduling Federal records to make future
records schedules and certain existing approved records schedules
applicable to series of records regardless of the medium in which the
records are created and maintained. Both the agency (in submitting the
schedule) and NARA (in approving the schedule) would be able to specify
that certain disposition authorities are valid only for the current
media/format of the records. Although agencies currently are permitted
to submit ``media-neutral'' records schedules, most existing records
schedules were developed for hard-copy (usually paper) recordkeeping
systems and do not state that they apply to records in other formats.
Therefore, agencies have been required to submit new schedules when
they convert from a hard-copy system of records, including special
media records (such as still pictures, aerial photography, maps,
charts, drawings, motion picture film, analog videotape, and analog
sound recordings), to an electronic system. This rule makes all new
schedules media neutral unless otherwise specified and allows schedules
previously approved for hard copy records to be applied to electronic
versions of the files if certain conditions are met. The new rule will
reduce the workload for both agencies and NARA, allowing them to focus
resources on critical records management needs.
DATES: This rule is effective December 17, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurence Brewer, Director, Life Cycle
Management Division, at 301-837-1539 or via fax at 301-837-3697.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 19, 2004, at 69 FR 67692, NARA published a proposed
rule making schedules media neutral. In response, we received comments
from five Federal agencies and from a private firm that does records
management work for Federal agencies. Four public interest groups
submitted comments on a related proposed records disposition schedule
modifying the General Records Schedules (GRS) to implement the proposed
rule insofar as the rule applies to previously approved schedules. The
notice inviting public comment on the proposed disposition schedule N1-
GRS-05-1 was published on November 16, 2004 (69 FR 67182). We
considered the comments on both the proposed rule and the proposed
disposition schedule in developing this final rule.
Discussion of Comments Received on the Proposed Rule
All five agencies and the consulting firm generally endorsed NARA's
proposals regarding media neutrality. However, three of the agencies
and the consulting firm felt that the new regulations should allow
agencies more than 45 days to notify NARA when they convert previously
scheduled permanent records to an electronic format. One of these
agencies suggested allowing agencies up to 90 days, while another
agency suggested that NARA require annual updates. The third agency
that addressed this issue suggested that the regulation require
notification ``as soon as possible.'' The
[[Page 64154]]
consulting firm suggested that notifying NARA be done as part of annual
or other periodic reviews conducted by agency records managers to
identify new or modified recordkeeping systems. NARA agrees that 45
days is probably not sufficient. Consequently, the final regulation
allows agencies up to 90 days to notify NARA when permanent records are
converted to an electronic format.
One agency commented on the wording in the regulation regarding
records maintained on agency web sites. This agency thought the term
``web version,'' which NARA used in the proposed rule, was not
sufficiently clear. In response to this comment, NARA has used the
expression ``copies of records that are maintained on an agency web
site.'' We believe that this wording clarifies NARA's intent.
The agency which commented on web site records also questioned why
the proposed regulations did not allow previously approved schedules to
be applied to temporary program records with retention periods of 20
years or more or to records containing observational and social science
raw data. (The consulting firm which submitted comments also questioned
these exclusions.) This agency suggested instead that ``the provisions
for media neutral schedules [in 36 CFR 1228.24(b)(3)] should be
grandfathered to include all previously approved records schedules and
not limited to those approved after the final date of this ruling.'' We
did not adopt either suggestion. Based on our analysis of all comments
on the proposed rule and disposition schedule, instead, the regulations
now allow retrospective media neutrality for temporary program records
only when the records are converted to scanned images or, in the case
of temporary audiovisual records, from traditional media to any digital
format. This matter is addressed in more detail in the following
discussion of the comments NARA received from several public interest
organizations.
Discussion of Comments Received on the Disposition Schedule
Four public interest groups also addressed NARA's media neutral
proposals. These organizations did not comment on the regulations
directly but provided comments on the NARA-prepared disposition
schedule (Disposition Job N1-GRS-05-1) that modified GRS 20 to reflect
the proposed regulations. Their comments on the proposed GRS 20
revisions concerning retrospective media neutrality as they relate to
the provisions of the proposed rule are discussed below.
None of the public interest groups commented on NARA's proposal to
make previously approved schedule items media neutral in the case of
permanent records. However, all of these groups were critical of
retrospective media neutrality as it relates to temporary program
records, arguing that the enhanced search capabilities and
manipulability of electronic records might increase the value of
records that were appropriately temporary if maintained in paper form.
In their view, if the proposed GRS modifications and regulations
pertaining to media neutrality were implemented, records warranting
permanent retention or a longer temporary retention period if
maintained electronically could be destroyed without NARA review.
Both this final rule and the approved schedule modifying GRS 20 now
allow for retrospective media neutrality for temporary program records
only if records are converted to scanned images in the case of textual
records or to digital media in the case of sound recordings, moving
images, and still photography. We note that this action reflects long-
standing NARA policy on conversion to scanned images. Since the 1990s,
NARA has authorized agencies to dispose of scanned images of temporary
hard copy records in accordance with previously approved schedules so
long as the basic content and function of the records remain the same.
While scanned images of hard copy records can with proper indexing
be searched more easily than the original documents, the information in
the records cannot be manipulated in the same fashion as a database. It
is this manipulability that renders some databases of historical value
even if the related paper records are temporary. Hence, the final rule
and the related changes to GRS 20 now mandate the submission of a new
schedule to NARA when an agency converts temporary program records that
are textual in nature to an electronic format other than scanned image.
This will afford NARA the opportunity to assess the value of the
electronic records to determine if their manipulability renders them
potentially permanent. This consideration, enhanced manipulability,
does not apply if an agency uses a digital format for its still
pictures or other temporary audiovisual records. In all instances,
therefore, where an agency converts temporary audiovisual records to a
digital format, the previously approved retention period may be
applied.
The GRS and the regulations, as initially proposed, would have
allowed agencies to apply retrospectively previously approved schedules
to electronic systems that merge information drawn from more than one
previously scheduled temporary record series so long as the electronic
records are maintained for the longest retention period specified in
the previously approved schedules. Two of the public interest groups
took issue with this, arguing that electronic systems that merge
information from multiple hard copy files are likely to be more
valuable than the component hard copy series considered individually.
NARA agrees and has revised the final rule to allow agencies to apply
previously approved schedules to electronic records drawn from multiple
temporary series only if the records are housekeeping in nature and are
either covered by temporary items in the GRS or by agency schedules for
administrative records. In the case of temporary program records,
agencies must submit a new schedule if an electronic system is drawn
from multiple previously scheduled series.
One public interest group commented that NARA's proposals did not
take into account that converting hard copy records to an electronic
format, by decreasing storage costs and increasing search capabilities
and manipulability might justify retaining the electronic versions
longer than the previously approved hard copy documents. NARA is well
aware that how long temporary records should be retained may change
over time, even absent a change in the recordkeeping medium. NARA
expects agencies to re-evaluate their needs periodically. If agencies
determine that a series of records warrants a longer retention period
for any reason, they should submit a schedule to NARA. Even though the
General Records Schedules are mandatory, agencies can submit schedules
requesting an exception if the retention periods specified in the GRS
do not meet their needs.
We have modified the provisions of the proposed rule and the
disposition schedule to address the comments. NARA published a notice
for the revised NARA-prepared disposition schedule on August 9, 2007
(72 FR 44875), and approved the schedule on September 26, 2007.
This rule is a significant regulatory action for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and has been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, I certify
that this rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities because it affects Federal agencies. This
regulation does not have any federalism
[[Page 64155]]
implications. This rule is not a major rule as defined in 5 U.S.C.
Chapter 8, Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1228
Archives and Records.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, NARA amends part 1228 of
title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 1228--DISPOSITION OF FEDERAL RECORDS
0
1. The authority citation for part 1228 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 44 U.S.C. chs. 21, 29, and 33.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1228.24 by redesignating paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) as
paragraphs (b)(4) and (b)(5) respectively, and adding new paragraph
(b)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 1228.24 Formulation of agency records schedules.
(b) * * *
(3) Records schedules submitted to NARA for approval on or after
[the effective date of the final rule] are media neutral, i.e., the
disposition instructions apply to the described records in all media,
unless the schedule identifies a specific medium for a specific series.
* * * * *
0
3. Add Sec. 1228.31 to read as follows:
Sec. 1228. 31 Applying previously approved schedules to electronic
records.
(a) When must an agency submit a new schedule for electronic
versions of previously scheduled hard copy records? Agencies must
submit a new schedule to NARA for electronic versions of previously
scheduled records if:
(1) The content and function of the records have changed
significantly (e.g., the electronic records contain information that is
substantially different from the information included in the hard copy
series or are used for different purposes).
(2) The previously approved schedule explicitly excludes electronic
records.
(3) The electronic records consist of program records maintained on
an agency web site.
(4) The electronic records consist of program records maintained in
a format other than scanned image AND the previously approved schedule
is not media neutral.
(b) When can an agency apply a previously approved schedule to
electronic versions of the records? If the conditions specified in
paragraph (a) of this section do not apply, the conditions in paragraph
(b) apply:
(1) Permanent records. (i) The agency may apply a previously
approved schedule for hard copy records to electronic versions of the
permanent records when the electronic records system replaces a single
series of hard copy permanent records or the electronic records consist
of information drawn from multiple previously scheduled permanent
series. Agencies must notify NARA (NWM) in writing of records that have
been previously scheduled as permanent in hard copy form, including
special media records as described in 36 CFR 1228.266 and 36 CFR
1228.268. The notification must be submitted within 90 days of when the
electronic recordkeeping system becomes operational and must contain
the:
(A) Name of agency;
(B) Name of the electronic system;
(C) Organizational unit(s) or agency program which records support;
(D) Current disposition authority reference; and
(E) Format of the records (e.g., database, scanned images, digital
photographs, etc.).
(ii) If the electronic records include information drawn from both
temporary and permanent hard copy series, an agency either may apply a
previously approved permanent disposition authority, after submitting
the notification required by paragraph (b)(1)(i) or may submit a new
schedule if the agency believes the electronic records do not warrant
permanent retention.
(2) Temporary still pictures, sound recordings, motion picture
film, and video recordings. The agency must apply the previously
approved schedule to digital versions. If changes in the approved
schedule are required, follow Sec. 1228.32.
(3) Scanned images of temporary records, including temporary
program records. The agency must apply the previously approved
schedule. If changes in the approved schedule are required, follow
Sec. 1228.32.
(4) Other temporary records maintained in an electronic format
other than scanned images. (i) For temporary records that are covered
by an item in a General Records Schedule or an agency-specific schedule
that pertains to administrative/housekeeping activities, apply the
previously approved schedule. If the electronic records consist of
information drawn from multiple hard copy series, apply the previously
approved schedule item with the longest retention period.
(ii) For temporary program records covered by a NARA-approved media
neutral schedule item (i.e., the item appears on a schedule approved
before December 17, 2007 that is explicitly stated to be media neutral,
or it appears on any schedule approved on or after December 17, 2007
that is not explicitly limited to a specific recordkeeping medium),
apply the previously approved schedule.
Dated: September 27, 2007.
Allen Weinstein,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. E7-22376 Filed 11-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P