In the Matter of Certain Unified Communications Systems, Products Used With Such Systems, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint, 62675-62676 [E7-21757]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 6, 2007 / Notices mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES within the exterior boundaries of any unit of the National Park System, National Wildlife Refuge System, or National Marine Sanctuary System, or any National Monument. Also, any request for authorization of data collection or technology testing activities in the areas of Nantucket Sound off Massachusetts and off Jones Beach, Long Island, New York, would be considered by the MMS to determine what impact any such authorizations would have on projects that are currently being evaluated by MMS pursuant to the ‘‘savings provision’’ included as section 388(d) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. authorization you are interested in acquiring? (4) Is the rental rate of $3.00 per acre appropriate? (5) How much acreage should be authorized for the types of activities proposed and how should leases for such activities be appropriately spaced (i.e., inclusion of buffers)? (6) How should the MMS define technology testing activities and what specific types of activities should be authorized by technology testing leases? Should technology testing leases accommodate projects that would require a transmission cable to connect to onshore interconnection points? Information Requested From Commenters As the MMS proposes to authorize on a limited basis the installation of data collection and technology testing facilities to produce or support production of alternative energy on the OCS, we invite all interested and affected parties to provide comments on any aspect of the interim policy. We also would appreciate responses to the questions posed below. (1) Would you be interested in acquiring an alternative energy resource assessment lease or technology testing lease as proposed under the interim policy? If so, please identify the resource(s) you would want to assess (e.g., wind, wave, current) and the technology you would want to test and provide a general description of the type and number of installations or technologies you would use, prospective locations, and a project schedule for the activities you would propose to pursue. The MMS requests respondents to identify prospective locations by depicting them on Official Protraction Diagrams (Leasing Maps for areas off Texas and Louisiana) available from each MMS regional office and online at http://www.mms.gov/ld/ Maps.htm. For areas such as those off Hawaii and Alaska that have nonexistent or incomplete Official Protraction Diagrams, please identify prospective locations by latitude and longitude (NAD 83). If you submit such nomination and application information, please provide the name, telephone number, and e-mail address of an individual for the MMS to contact. (2) Would you be willing to collaborate and enter into joint ventures with other prospective lessees who express interest in acquiring the same location for an alternative energy resource assessment or technology testing lease? (3) What would be an appropriate lease term (duration) for the Dated: October 25, 2007. Randall B. Luthi, Director, Minerals Management Service. [FR Doc. E7–21793 Filed 11–5–07; 8:45 am] VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:55 Nov 05, 2007 Jkt 214001 BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–598] In the Matter of Certain Unified Communications Systems, Products Used With Such Systems, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant’s Motion To Amend the Complaint U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 19) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting complainant’s motion to amend the complaint in the above-captioned investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2310. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 62675 The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on March 26, 2007, based on a complaint filed by Microsoft Corporation (‘‘Microsoft’’) of Redmond, Washington. 72 FR 14138–9. The complaint, as amended and supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. **1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain unified communications systems, products used with such systems, and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,421,439 (‘‘the ‘439 patent’’); 6,430,289 (‘‘the ‘289 patent’’); 6,263,064 (‘‘the ‘064 patent’’); and 6,728,357 (‘‘the ‘357 patent’’). The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission’s notice of investigation named Alcatel-Lucent of Paris, France as the only respondent. On April 20, 2007, Microsoft initially moved to amend the complaint to: (1) Substitute Alcatel Business Systems for Alcatel-Lucent as respondent in this investigation, and (2) add allegations of infringement of claims 8, 28, 38, and 48 of the ‘439 patent, and claim 20 of the ‘064 patent. Alcatel-Lucent, proposed respondent Alcatel Business Systems, and the Commission investigative attorney did not oppose the motion. On May 17 and September 20, 2007, respectively, the Commission determined not to review IDs, issued by the presiding ALJ, granting Microsoft’s motions to amend the complaint and to terminate the investigation in part based on Microsoft’s withdrawal of certain claims. On October 23, 2007, the Commission determined not to review an ID granting Microsoft’s withdrawal of additional claims. On October 12, 2007, respondent filed an unopposed motion to further amend the complaint to reflect a corporate name change from Alcatel Business Systems to Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise. On October 15, 2007, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting respondent’s motion to amend the complaint. No party petitioned for review of the ID pursuant to 19 CFR 210.43(a). The Commission has determined not to review this ID. E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM 06NON1 62676 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 6, 2007 / Notices The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in sections 210.14 and 210.42(c) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.14, 210.42(c). DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1123–NEW] Issued: October 25, 2007. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–21757 Filed 11–5–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [USITC SE–07–022] Sunshine Act Meeting United States International Trade Commission. Time and Date: November 9, 2007 at 11 a.m. Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205–2000. Status: Open to the public. Matters To Be Considered: 1. Agenda for future meetings: none. 2. Minutes. 3. Ratification List. 4. Inv. Nos. 731–TA–1131–1134 (Preliminary) (Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from Brazil, China, Thailand, and the United Arab Emirates)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations to the Secretary of Commerce on or before November 13, 2007; Commissioners’ opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on or before November 20, 2007.) 5. Outstanding action jackets: none. In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Issued: October 29, 2007. By order of the Commission. William R. Bishop, Hearings and Meetings Coordinator. [FR Doc. E7–21736 Filed 11–5–07; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:55 Nov 05, 2007 Jkt 214001 Criminal Division; Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section; Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested 30-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: Annual Certification Report and Equitable Sharing Agreement. ACTION: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Criminal Division, Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section (AFMLS) will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register Volume 72, Number 190, pages 56095– 56096 on October 2, 2007, allowing for a 60-day comment period. The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days for public comment until December 6, 2007. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503. Additionally, comments may be submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 395–5806. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection (1) Type of Information Collection: Authorization and combination of two currently unapproved collections. (2) Title of the Form/Collection: Annual Certification Report and Equitable Sharing Agreement. (3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: Form Number: N/A. Criminal Division, Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Law Enforcement Agencies that participate in the Federal Equitable Sharing Program. Other: None. The form is part of a voluntary program in which law enforcement agencies receive forfeited assets and proceeds to further law enforcement operations. The participating law enforcement agencies must account for their use of program funds on an annual basis and renew their contract of participation. DOJ uses this information to ensure that the funds are spent in accordance with the requirements of the program. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: It is estimated that 8,729 respondents will complete a 30 minute form. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: (7) There are an estimated 43,652 annual total burden hours associated with this collection. If additional information is required contact: Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, Suite 1600, Patrick Henry Building, 601 D Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530. Dated: October 31, 2007. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United States Department of Justice. [FR Doc. E7–21813 Filed 11–5–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–14–P E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM 06NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62675-62676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21757]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-598]


In the Matter of Certain Unified Communications Systems, Products 
Used With Such Systems, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission 
Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's 
Motion To Amend the Complaint

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 19) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') granting complainant's motion to amend the complaint in the 
above-captioned investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2310. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on March 26, 2007, based on a complaint filed by Microsoft Corporation 
(``Microsoft'') of Redmond, Washington. 72 FR 14138-9. The complaint, 
as amended and supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. **1337, in the importation 
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within 
the United States after importation of certain unified communications 
systems, products used with such systems, and components thereof by 
reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,421,439 
(``the `439 patent''); 6,430,289 (``the `289 patent''); 6,263,064 
(``the `064 patent''); and 6,728,357 (``the `357 patent''). The 
complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The 
Commission's notice of investigation named Alcatel-Lucent of Paris, 
France as the only respondent.
    On April 20, 2007, Microsoft initially moved to amend the complaint 
to: (1) Substitute Alcatel Business Systems for Alcatel-Lucent as 
respondent in this investigation, and (2) add allegations of 
infringement of claims 8, 28, 38, and 48 of the `439 patent, and claim 
20 of the `064 patent. Alcatel-Lucent, proposed respondent Alcatel 
Business Systems, and the Commission investigative attorney did not 
oppose the motion.
    On May 17 and September 20, 2007, respectively, the Commission 
determined not to review IDs, issued by the presiding ALJ, granting 
Microsoft's motions to amend the complaint and to terminate the 
investigation in part based on Microsoft's withdrawal of certain 
claims. On October 23, 2007, the Commission determined not to review an 
ID granting Microsoft's withdrawal of additional claims.
    On October 12, 2007, respondent filed an unopposed motion to 
further amend the complaint to reflect a corporate name change from 
Alcatel Business Systems to Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise.
    On October 15, 2007, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting 
respondent's motion to amend the complaint. No party petitioned for 
review of the ID pursuant to 19 CFR 210.43(a). The Commission has 
determined not to review this ID.

[[Page 62676]]

    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and 
in sections 210.14 and 210.42(c) of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.14, 210.42(c).

    Issued: October 25, 2007.
    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E7-21757 Filed 11-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P