Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 61684-61686 [E7-21353]

Download as PDF 61684 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 31, 2007 / Notices [FR Doc. E7–21352 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–62,013] Columbia Lighting: Spokane, WA; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on August 21, 2007 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Columbia Lighting, Spokane, Washington. The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of October, 2007. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–21350 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–62,353] Hewlett Packard: Fort Collins, CO; Notice of Termination of Investigation rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 24, 2007 in response to a petition filed by a state agency representative on behalf of workers at Hewlett Packard, Fort Collins, Colorado. The workers at the subject facility provide troubleshooting support for Hewlett Packard customers. The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. Signed in Washington, DC, this 25th day of October 2007. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–21349 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:45 Oct 30, 2007 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Jkt 214001 In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA–W) number issued during the period of October 15 through October 19, 2007. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers’ firm are 50 years of age or older. 2. Whether the workers in the workers’ firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. 3. The competitive conditions within the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions within the industry are adverse). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM 31OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 31, 2007 / Notices rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. None. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–62,117; Intasco USA, Port Huron, MI: September 6, 2006. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. None. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been met. None. Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–62,005; Novacel, Inc., Newton, MA: September 30, 2007. TA–W–62,025; Seminole Tubular Products—Wheatland Tube Co., John Maneely Company, Houston, TX: August 20, 2006. TA–W–62,225; Delphi Corporation, East River Lab Facility, Moraine, OH: September 28, 2006. TA–W–62,228; Waverly Mills, Inc., A Subsidiary of R.J. Kunic and Co., Laurinburg, NC: September 26, 2006. TA–W–62,249; Fiskars Brands, Inc., Sauk City, WI: October 3, 2006. TA–W–62,275; Hubbell Power Systems, Inc., Connectors Business Unit, Workforce Personnel, Clanton, AL: October 5, 2006. TA–W–62,299; GDX Automotive, Inc., North American Division, A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of GDX Automotive North America, Batesville, AR: October 11, 2006. TA–W–61,860; Laser Die and Engineering, A Subsidiary of Hi-Tec VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:45 Oct 30, 2007 Jkt 214001 Enterprises, Hi-Tec Employment Services, LLC, Kentwood, MI: July 20, 2006. TA–W–61,860A; J-Tec Products Co., A Subsidiary of Hi-Tec Enterprises, Hi-Tec Employment Services, LLC, Kentwood, MI: July 20, 2006. TA–W–62,108; Vermont Plywood, LLC, Hancock, VT: September 4, 2006. TA–W–62,162; Through The Barn Door Furniture Co., Henderson, NC: September 18, 2006. TA–W–62,182; Ideal Tool Company, Inc., Tooling Division, On-Site Leased Workers From M-Ploy Temporaries, Meadville, PA: September 18, 2006. TA–W–62,218; Neilsen Manufacturing, Inc., Salem, OR: November 9, 2007. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–62,062; IPC Command Systems, A Division of IPC Information Systems, LLC, Mount Laurel, NJ: August 22, 2006. TA–W–62,209; Lear Corporation, Seating Systems Division, Walker, MI: September 25, 2006. TA–W–62,224; Porter Engineered Systems Ohio, Including Global Technical Recruiters, Solon, OH: September 28, 2006. TA–W–62,235; Sanmina-SCI, Enterprise Computing, Remedy, Fountain, CO: September 13, 2007. TA–W–62,296; Delphi Corporation #1, Powertrain Division, Oak Creek, WI: October 3, 2006. TA–W–62,192; TMP Directional Marketing, LLC, Graphics Division, Fort Wayne, IN: September 19, 2006. TA–W–62,203; HDM Furniture Industries, Inc., Plant 43 Morganton Casegoods, Manpower, Friday, etc., Morganton, NC: September 25, 2006. TA–W–62,208; Tyco Valves and Controls, Manpower, Adecco, Resource Mfg & All Tech, Houston, TX: September 25, 2006. TA–W–62,236; AB Automotive, Inc., OnSite Leased Workers From Corestaff Services and Manpower Services, Smithfield, NC: September 30, 2006. TA–W–62,301; AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Chemicals Division, Bayonne, NJ: October 10, 2006. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 61685 TA–W–61,639; Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc., Casting and Extrusion Divisions, Ellenville, NY: May 30, 2007. TA–W–62,137; Drake Extrusion, Inc., Div. of Chapelthorpe, Ridgeway, VA: September 11, 2006. TA–W–62,285; Carolina Textile Company, Inc., Dobson, NC: October 1, 2006. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. None. Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50 years of age or older. TA–W–62,117; Intasco USA, Port Huron, MI. The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. None. The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been met. Competition conditions within the workers’ industry are not adverse. None. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met. TA–W–62,017; Fargo Electronics, A Subsidiary of HID Global, Eden Prairie, MN. TA–W–62,133; Spectrum Yarns, Inc., Kings Mountain, NC. E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM 31OCN1 61686 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 31, 2007 / Notices rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES TA–W–62,229; Learjet, Inc., A Subsidiary of Bombardier, Inc., Wichita, KS. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. None. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA–W–61,862; OEM/Erie, Inc., Erie, PA. TA–W–61,902; Gates Corporation, Power Transmission Division, Moncks Corner, SC. TA–W–61,936; Gruber Systems, Inc., Valencia, CA. TA–W–62,085; Smurfit Stone Container Corporation, Container Division, Columbia, SC. TA–W–62,101; American Woodmark, Hardy County Plant, Moorefield, WV. TA–W–62,115; Rheem Sales Company, Air Conditioning Division, A Subsidiary of Rheem Mfg. Co., Milledgeville, GA. TA–W–62,119; Cygne Design, Commerce, CA. TA–W–62,216; Woolrich, Inc, Corporate Headquarters, Woolrich, PA. TA–W–62,271; Ravenwood Specialty Services, Inc., Ravenswood, WV. The workers’ firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. TA–W–61,990; CDI Corporation, CDI IT Solutions (IMB NE), Fishkill, NY. TA–W–62,166; Thompson Scientific, Thompson Scientific IDPO, Cherry Hill, NJ. TA–W–62,199; Faith Technologies, Appleton, WI. TA–W–62,252; Gavin Chevrolet Buick Pontiac Inc, Middleville, MI. The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified eligible to apply for TAA. TA–W–61,669; Superior Mills, Inc., Marion, VA. I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of October 15 through October 19, 2007. Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C–5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:45 Oct 30, 2007 Jkt 214001 Dated: October 25, 2007. Ralph DiBattista, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–21353 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P Signed at Washington, DC this 24th day of October 2007. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–21351 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–62,253] [TA–W–61,266] Manpower Incorporated, Spring Lake, MI; Notice of Termination of Investigation Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation, Concord, California; Notice of Negative Determination on Remand Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 4, 2007 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Manpower Incorporated, Spring Lake, Michigan. Workers of the subject firm are covered by a certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance and alternative trade adjustment assistance under petition number TA– W–61,530 (amended), that does not expire until August 23, 2009. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose and the investigation under this petition has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of October 2007. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–21356 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–62,316] Meco Corporation, Greeneville, TN; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 17, 2007 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Meco Corporation, Greeneville, Tennessee. The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 On August 9, 2007, the United States Court of International Trade (USCIT) granted the Department of Labor’s request for voluntary remand to conduct further investigation in Former Employees of Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation v. United States Secretary of Labor (Court No. 07– 00182). On April 19, 2007, the Department of Labor (Department) issued a Negative Determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers and former workers of Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation, Concord, California (the subject firm). (Administrative Record (‘‘AR’’) 64). The Department’s Notice of negative determination was published in the Federal Register on May 9, 2007 (72 FR 26425). (AR 76). The determination stated that, because the workers did not produce an article, and did not support a firm or appropriate subdivision that produced an article domestically, the workers cannot be considered import impacted or affected by a shift of production abroad. (AR 64– 65). Administrative reconsideration was not requested by any of the parties pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18. The complaint alleges that the subject workers are eligible to apply for worker adjustment assistance due to a shift of production to India followed by increased imports (‘‘our work was sent to Bangalore, India * * * our daily contract underwriting work was retrieved electronically by this team * * * then sent electronically back to * * * the United States’’). In order for the Secretary to issue a certification, petitioners must meet the group eligibility requirements under section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM 31OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61684-61686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21353]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility to Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment 
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of October 
15 through October 19, 2007.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
    I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
    A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or 
partially separated;
    B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision 
have decreased absolutely; and
    C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with 
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed 
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to 
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
    II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
    A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or 
partially separated;
    B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or 
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly 
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or 
subdivision; and
    C. One of the following must be satisfied:
    1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of 
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United 
States;
    2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of 
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference 
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin 
Economic Recovery Act; or
    3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of 
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are 
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
    Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for 
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' 
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or 
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially 
separated;
    (2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream 
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers 
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade 
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related 
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
    (3) Either--
    (A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) 
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the 
workers' firm; or
    (B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm (or 
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the 
workers' separation or threat of separation.
    In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a 
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements 
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
    1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 
50 years of age or older.
    2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are 
not easily transferable.
    3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e., 
conditions within the industry are adverse).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact

[[Page 61685]]

date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

None.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

TA-W-62,117; Intasco USA, Port Huron, MI: September 6, 2006.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
None.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are 
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or 
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been 
met.
None.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-62,005; Novacel, Inc., Newton, MA: September 30, 2007.
TA-W-62,025; Seminole Tubular Products--Wheatland Tube Co., John 
Maneely Company, Houston, TX: August 20, 2006.
TA-W-62,225; Delphi Corporation, East River Lab Facility, Moraine, OH: 
September 28, 2006.
TA-W-62,228; Waverly Mills, Inc., A Subsidiary of R.J. Kunic and Co., 
Laurinburg, NC: September 26, 2006.
TA-W-62,249; Fiskars Brands, Inc., Sauk City, WI: October 3, 2006.
TA-W-62,275; Hubbell Power Systems, Inc., Connectors Business Unit, 
Workforce Personnel, Clanton, AL: October 5, 2006.
TA-W-62,299; GDX Automotive, Inc., North American Division, A Wholly 
Owned Subsidiary of GDX Automotive North America, Batesville, AR: 
October 11, 2006.
TA-W-61,860; Laser Die and Engineering, A Subsidiary of Hi-Tec 
Enterprises, Hi-Tec Employment Services, LLC, Kentwood, MI: July 20, 
2006.
TA-W-61,860A; J-Tec Products Co., A Subsidiary of Hi-Tec Enterprises, 
Hi-Tec Employment Services, LLC, Kentwood, MI: July 20, 2006.
TA-W-62,108; Vermont Plywood, LLC, Hancock, VT: September 4, 2006.
TA-W-62,162; Through The Barn Door Furniture Co., Henderson, NC: 
September 18, 2006.
TA-W-62,182; Ideal Tool Company, Inc., Tooling Division, On-Site Leased 
Workers From M-Ploy Temporaries, Meadville, PA: September 18, 2006.
TA-W-62,218; Neilsen Manufacturing, Inc., Salem, OR: November 9, 2007.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-62,062; IPC Command Systems, A Division of IPC Information 
Systems, LLC, Mount Laurel, NJ: August 22, 2006.
TA-W-62,209; Lear Corporation, Seating Systems Division, Walker, MI: 
September 25, 2006.
TA-W-62,224; Porter Engineered Systems Ohio, Including Global Technical 
Recruiters, Solon, OH: September 28, 2006.
TA-W-62,235; Sanmina-SCI, Enterprise Computing, Remedy, Fountain, CO: 
September 13, 2007.
TA-W-62,296; Delphi Corporation #1, Powertrain Division, Oak Creek, WI: 
October 3, 2006.
TA-W-62,192; TMP Directional Marketing, LLC, Graphics Division, Fort 
Wayne, IN: September 19, 2006.
TA-W-62,203; HDM Furniture Industries, Inc., Plant 43 Morganton 
Casegoods, Manpower, Friday, etc., Morganton, NC: September 25, 2006.
TA-W-62,208; Tyco Valves and Controls, Manpower, Adecco, Resource Mfg & 
All Tech, Houston, TX: September 25, 2006.
TA-W-62,236; AB Automotive, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers From Corestaff 
Services and Manpower Services, Smithfield, NC: September 30, 2006.
TA-W-62,301; AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Chemicals Division, Bayonne, 
NJ: October 10, 2006.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 
been met.

TA-W-61,639; Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc., Casting and Extrusion 
Divisions, Ellenville, NY: May 30, 2007.
TA-W-62,137; Drake Extrusion, Inc., Div. of Chapelthorpe, Ridgeway, VA: 
September 11, 2006.
TA-W-62,285; Carolina Textile Company, Inc., Dobson, NC: October 1, 
2006.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are 
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or 
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

None.

Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, it has been determined that the 
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons 
specified.
    The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has 
not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50 
years of age or older.

TA-W-62,117; Intasco USA, Port Huron, MI.
    The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has 
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily 
transferable.

None.

    The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has 
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are 
not adverse.

None.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met 
for the reasons specified.
    Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, 
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and 
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.

TA-W-62,017; Fargo Electronics, A Subsidiary of HID Global, Eden 
Prairie, MN.
TA-W-62,133; Spectrum Yarns, Inc., Kings Mountain, NC.

[[Page 61686]]

TA-W-62,229; Learjet, Inc., A Subsidiary of Bombardier, Inc., Wichita, 
KS.

    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 
production to a foreign country) have not been met.

None.

    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign 
country) have not been met.

TA-W-61,862; OEM/Erie, Inc., Erie, PA.
TA-W-61,902; Gates Corporation, Power Transmission Division, Moncks 
Corner, SC.
TA-W-61,936; Gruber Systems, Inc., Valencia, CA.
TA-W-62,085; Smurfit Stone Container Corporation, Container Division, 
Columbia, SC.
TA-W-62,101; American Woodmark, Hardy County Plant, Moorefield, WV.
TA-W-62,115; Rheem Sales Company, Air Conditioning Division, A 
Subsidiary of Rheem Mfg. Co., Milledgeville, GA.
TA-W-62,119; Cygne Design, Commerce, CA.
TA-W-62,216; Woolrich, Inc, Corporate Headquarters, Woolrich, PA.
TA-W-62,271; Ravenwood Specialty Services, Inc., Ravenswood, WV.

    The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for 
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA-W-61,990; CDI Corporation, CDI IT Solutions (IMB NE), Fishkill, NY.
TA-W-62,166; Thompson Scientific, Thompson Scientific IDPO, Cherry 
Hill, NJ.
TA-W-62,199; Faith Technologies, Appleton, WI.
TA-W-62,252; Gavin Chevrolet Buick Pontiac Inc, Middleville, MI.

    The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has 
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to 
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified 
eligible to apply for TAA.

TA-W-61,669; Superior Mills, Inc., Marion, VA.

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were 
issued during the period of October 15 through October 19, 2007. 
Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room 
C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed 
to persons who write to the above address.

    Dated: October 25, 2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-21353 Filed 10-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P