Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 61684-61686 [E7-21353]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
61684
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 31, 2007 / Notices
[FR Doc. E7–21352 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Employment and Training
Administration
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility to Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,013]
Columbia Lighting: Spokane, WA;
Notice of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on August
21, 2007 in response to a petition filed
by a company official on behalf of
workers of Columbia Lighting, Spokane,
Washington.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of
October, 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–21350 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,353]
Hewlett Packard: Fort Collins, CO;
Notice of Termination of Investigation
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on October
24, 2007 in response to a petition filed
by a state agency representative on
behalf of workers at Hewlett Packard,
Fort Collins, Colorado. The workers at
the subject facility provide
troubleshooting support for Hewlett
Packard customers.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 25th day of
October 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–21349 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:45 Oct 30, 2007
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Jkt 214001
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
period of October 15 through October
19, 2007.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm
and a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 31, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W–62,117; Intasco USA, Port Huron,
MI: September 6, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act
have been met.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–62,005; Novacel, Inc., Newton,
MA: September 30, 2007.
TA–W–62,025; Seminole Tubular
Products—Wheatland Tube Co.,
John Maneely Company, Houston,
TX: August 20, 2006.
TA–W–62,225; Delphi Corporation, East
River Lab Facility, Moraine, OH:
September 28, 2006.
TA–W–62,228; Waverly Mills, Inc., A
Subsidiary of R.J. Kunic and Co.,
Laurinburg, NC: September 26,
2006.
TA–W–62,249; Fiskars Brands, Inc.,
Sauk City, WI: October 3, 2006.
TA–W–62,275; Hubbell Power Systems,
Inc., Connectors Business Unit,
Workforce Personnel, Clanton, AL:
October 5, 2006.
TA–W–62,299; GDX Automotive, Inc.,
North American Division, A Wholly
Owned Subsidiary of GDX
Automotive North America,
Batesville, AR: October 11, 2006.
TA–W–61,860; Laser Die and
Engineering, A Subsidiary of Hi-Tec
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:45 Oct 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
Enterprises, Hi-Tec Employment
Services, LLC, Kentwood, MI: July
20, 2006.
TA–W–61,860A; J-Tec Products Co., A
Subsidiary of Hi-Tec Enterprises,
Hi-Tec Employment Services, LLC,
Kentwood, MI: July 20, 2006.
TA–W–62,108; Vermont Plywood, LLC,
Hancock, VT: September 4, 2006.
TA–W–62,162; Through The Barn Door
Furniture Co., Henderson, NC:
September 18, 2006.
TA–W–62,182; Ideal Tool Company,
Inc., Tooling Division, On-Site
Leased Workers From M-Ploy
Temporaries, Meadville, PA:
September 18, 2006.
TA–W–62,218; Neilsen Manufacturing,
Inc., Salem, OR: November 9, 2007.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–62,062; IPC Command Systems,
A Division of IPC Information
Systems, LLC, Mount Laurel, NJ:
August 22, 2006.
TA–W–62,209; Lear Corporation,
Seating Systems Division, Walker,
MI: September 25, 2006.
TA–W–62,224; Porter Engineered
Systems Ohio, Including Global
Technical Recruiters, Solon, OH:
September 28, 2006.
TA–W–62,235; Sanmina-SCI, Enterprise
Computing, Remedy, Fountain, CO:
September 13, 2007.
TA–W–62,296; Delphi Corporation #1,
Powertrain Division, Oak Creek, WI:
October 3, 2006.
TA–W–62,192; TMP Directional
Marketing, LLC, Graphics Division,
Fort Wayne, IN: September 19,
2006.
TA–W–62,203; HDM Furniture
Industries, Inc., Plant 43 Morganton
Casegoods, Manpower, Friday, etc.,
Morganton, NC: September 25,
2006.
TA–W–62,208; Tyco Valves and
Controls, Manpower, Adecco,
Resource Mfg & All Tech, Houston,
TX: September 25, 2006.
TA–W–62,236; AB Automotive, Inc., OnSite Leased Workers From Corestaff
Services and Manpower Services,
Smithfield, NC: September 30,
2006.
TA–W–62,301; AGC Chemicals
Americas, Inc., Chemicals Division,
Bayonne, NJ: October 10, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade
Act have been met.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61685
TA–W–61,639; Hydro Aluminum North
America, Inc., Casting and
Extrusion Divisions, Ellenville, NY:
May 30, 2007.
TA–W–62,137; Drake Extrusion, Inc.,
Div. of Chapelthorpe, Ridgeway,
VA: September 11, 2006.
TA–W–62,285; Carolina Textile
Company, Inc., Dobson, NC:
October 1, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) and Section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. The firm does not have a
significant number of workers 50 years
of age or older.
TA–W–62,117; Intasco USA, Port Huron,
MI.
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
None.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
TA–W–62,017; Fargo Electronics, A
Subsidiary of HID Global, Eden
Prairie, MN.
TA–W–62,133; Spectrum Yarns, Inc.,
Kings Mountain, NC.
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
61686
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 31, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
TA–W–62,229; Learjet, Inc., A
Subsidiary of Bombardier, Inc.,
Wichita, KS.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–61,862; OEM/Erie, Inc., Erie, PA.
TA–W–61,902; Gates Corporation,
Power Transmission Division,
Moncks Corner, SC.
TA–W–61,936; Gruber Systems, Inc.,
Valencia, CA.
TA–W–62,085; Smurfit Stone Container
Corporation, Container Division,
Columbia, SC.
TA–W–62,101; American Woodmark,
Hardy County Plant, Moorefield,
WV.
TA–W–62,115; Rheem Sales Company,
Air Conditioning Division, A
Subsidiary of Rheem Mfg. Co.,
Milledgeville, GA.
TA–W–62,119; Cygne Design,
Commerce, CA.
TA–W–62,216; Woolrich, Inc, Corporate
Headquarters, Woolrich, PA.
TA–W–62,271; Ravenwood Specialty
Services, Inc., Ravenswood, WV.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under Section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–W–61,990; CDI Corporation, CDI IT
Solutions (IMB NE), Fishkill, NY.
TA–W–62,166; Thompson Scientific,
Thompson Scientific IDPO, Cherry
Hill, NJ.
TA–W–62,199; Faith Technologies,
Appleton, WI.
TA–W–62,252; Gavin Chevrolet Buick
Pontiac Inc, Middleville, MI.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
TA–W–61,669; Superior Mills, Inc.,
Marion, VA.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned
determinations were issued during the period
of October 15 through October 19, 2007.
Copies of these determinations are available
for inspection in Room C–5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during
normal business hours or will be mailed to
persons who write to the above address.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:45 Oct 30, 2007
Jkt 214001
Dated: October 25, 2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–21353 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Signed at Washington, DC this 24th day of
October 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–21351 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,253]
[TA–W–61,266]
Manpower Incorporated, Spring Lake,
MI; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Mortgage Guaranty Insurance
Corporation, Concord, California;
Notice of Negative Determination on
Remand
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on October 4,
2007 in response to a petition filed by
a company official on behalf of workers
of Manpower Incorporated, Spring Lake,
Michigan.
Workers of the subject firm are
covered by a certification of eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance
and alternative trade adjustment
assistance under petition number TA–
W–61,530 (amended), that does not
expire until August 23, 2009.
Consequently, further investigation in
this case would serve no purpose and
the investigation under this petition has
been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day
of October 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–21356 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,316]
Meco Corporation, Greeneville, TN;
Notice of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on October
17, 2007 in response to a petition filed
by a company official on behalf of
workers at Meco Corporation,
Greeneville, Tennessee.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On August 9, 2007, the United States
Court of International Trade (USCIT)
granted the Department of Labor’s
request for voluntary remand to conduct
further investigation in Former
Employees of Mortgage Guaranty
Insurance Corporation v. United States
Secretary of Labor (Court No. 07–
00182).
On April 19, 2007, the Department of
Labor (Department) issued a Negative
Determination regarding eligibility to
apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
(TAA) and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of Mortgage Guaranty Insurance
Corporation, Concord, California (the
subject firm). (Administrative Record
(‘‘AR’’) 64). The Department’s Notice of
negative determination was published
in the Federal Register on May 9, 2007
(72 FR 26425). (AR 76). The
determination stated that, because the
workers did not produce an article, and
did not support a firm or appropriate
subdivision that produced an article
domestically, the workers cannot be
considered import impacted or affected
by a shift of production abroad. (AR 64–
65).
Administrative reconsideration was
not requested by any of the parties
pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18.
The complaint alleges that the subject
workers are eligible to apply for worker
adjustment assistance due to a shift of
production to India followed by
increased imports (‘‘our work was sent
to Bangalore, India * * * our daily
contract underwriting work was
retrieved electronically by this team
* * * then sent electronically back to
* * * the United States’’).
In order for the Secretary to issue a
certification, petitioners must meet the
group eligibility requirements under
section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM
31OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61684-61686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21353]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of October
15 through October 19, 2007.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact
[[Page 61685]]
date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA-W-62,117; Intasco USA, Port Huron, MI: September 6, 2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-62,005; Novacel, Inc., Newton, MA: September 30, 2007.
TA-W-62,025; Seminole Tubular Products--Wheatland Tube Co., John
Maneely Company, Houston, TX: August 20, 2006.
TA-W-62,225; Delphi Corporation, East River Lab Facility, Moraine, OH:
September 28, 2006.
TA-W-62,228; Waverly Mills, Inc., A Subsidiary of R.J. Kunic and Co.,
Laurinburg, NC: September 26, 2006.
TA-W-62,249; Fiskars Brands, Inc., Sauk City, WI: October 3, 2006.
TA-W-62,275; Hubbell Power Systems, Inc., Connectors Business Unit,
Workforce Personnel, Clanton, AL: October 5, 2006.
TA-W-62,299; GDX Automotive, Inc., North American Division, A Wholly
Owned Subsidiary of GDX Automotive North America, Batesville, AR:
October 11, 2006.
TA-W-61,860; Laser Die and Engineering, A Subsidiary of Hi-Tec
Enterprises, Hi-Tec Employment Services, LLC, Kentwood, MI: July 20,
2006.
TA-W-61,860A; J-Tec Products Co., A Subsidiary of Hi-Tec Enterprises,
Hi-Tec Employment Services, LLC, Kentwood, MI: July 20, 2006.
TA-W-62,108; Vermont Plywood, LLC, Hancock, VT: September 4, 2006.
TA-W-62,162; Through The Barn Door Furniture Co., Henderson, NC:
September 18, 2006.
TA-W-62,182; Ideal Tool Company, Inc., Tooling Division, On-Site Leased
Workers From M-Ploy Temporaries, Meadville, PA: September 18, 2006.
TA-W-62,218; Neilsen Manufacturing, Inc., Salem, OR: November 9, 2007.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-62,062; IPC Command Systems, A Division of IPC Information
Systems, LLC, Mount Laurel, NJ: August 22, 2006.
TA-W-62,209; Lear Corporation, Seating Systems Division, Walker, MI:
September 25, 2006.
TA-W-62,224; Porter Engineered Systems Ohio, Including Global Technical
Recruiters, Solon, OH: September 28, 2006.
TA-W-62,235; Sanmina-SCI, Enterprise Computing, Remedy, Fountain, CO:
September 13, 2007.
TA-W-62,296; Delphi Corporation #1, Powertrain Division, Oak Creek, WI:
October 3, 2006.
TA-W-62,192; TMP Directional Marketing, LLC, Graphics Division, Fort
Wayne, IN: September 19, 2006.
TA-W-62,203; HDM Furniture Industries, Inc., Plant 43 Morganton
Casegoods, Manpower, Friday, etc., Morganton, NC: September 25, 2006.
TA-W-62,208; Tyco Valves and Controls, Manpower, Adecco, Resource Mfg &
All Tech, Houston, TX: September 25, 2006.
TA-W-62,236; AB Automotive, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers From Corestaff
Services and Manpower Services, Smithfield, NC: September 30, 2006.
TA-W-62,301; AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Chemicals Division, Bayonne,
NJ: October 10, 2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
TA-W-61,639; Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc., Casting and Extrusion
Divisions, Ellenville, NY: May 30, 2007.
TA-W-62,137; Drake Extrusion, Inc., Div. of Chapelthorpe, Ridgeway, VA:
September 11, 2006.
TA-W-62,285; Carolina Textile Company, Inc., Dobson, NC: October 1,
2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has
not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50
years of age or older.
TA-W-62,117; Intasco USA, Port Huron, MI.
The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
None.
The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA,
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.
TA-W-62,017; Fargo Electronics, A Subsidiary of HID Global, Eden
Prairie, MN.
TA-W-62,133; Spectrum Yarns, Inc., Kings Mountain, NC.
[[Page 61686]]
TA-W-62,229; Learjet, Inc., A Subsidiary of Bombardier, Inc., Wichita,
KS.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-61,862; OEM/Erie, Inc., Erie, PA.
TA-W-61,902; Gates Corporation, Power Transmission Division, Moncks
Corner, SC.
TA-W-61,936; Gruber Systems, Inc., Valencia, CA.
TA-W-62,085; Smurfit Stone Container Corporation, Container Division,
Columbia, SC.
TA-W-62,101; American Woodmark, Hardy County Plant, Moorefield, WV.
TA-W-62,115; Rheem Sales Company, Air Conditioning Division, A
Subsidiary of Rheem Mfg. Co., Milledgeville, GA.
TA-W-62,119; Cygne Design, Commerce, CA.
TA-W-62,216; Woolrich, Inc, Corporate Headquarters, Woolrich, PA.
TA-W-62,271; Ravenwood Specialty Services, Inc., Ravenswood, WV.
The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-61,990; CDI Corporation, CDI IT Solutions (IMB NE), Fishkill, NY.
TA-W-62,166; Thompson Scientific, Thompson Scientific IDPO, Cherry
Hill, NJ.
TA-W-62,199; Faith Technologies, Appleton, WI.
TA-W-62,252; Gavin Chevrolet Buick Pontiac Inc, Middleville, MI.
The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified
eligible to apply for TAA.
TA-W-61,669; Superior Mills, Inc., Marion, VA.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of October 15 through October 19, 2007.
Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room
C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed
to persons who write to the above address.
Dated: October 25, 2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-21353 Filed 10-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
