Hot-Rolled Steel Products From Argentina, China, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Romania, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine, 61676-61677 [E7-21337]

Download as PDF rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES 61676 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 31, 2007 / Notices in this notice are the sole responsibility of the museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the Native American human remains. The National Park Service is not responsible for the determinations in this notice. A detailed assessment of the human remains was made by University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology professional staff on behalf of The Wistar Institute in consultation with representatives of the Hawai’i Island Burial Council, Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei, Kauai/Niihau Island Burial Council, Maui/Lanai Island Burial Council, Molokai Island Burial Council, O’ahu Burial Committee, and Office of Hawaiian Affairs. The Wistar Institute retains ownership of these human remains, but has authorized the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology to handle the NAGPRA process in collaboration with The Wistar Institute and on its behalf. At an unknown date, but probably around 1905, human remains representing a minimum of one individual were removed from one of the Hawaiian Islands by an unknown person. At an unknown date, the human remains were accessioned into the collections of The Wistar Institute (accession number: 14347). The human remains were transferred to the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology on a long term loan in 1956 (catalogue number: L–1011–124). On May 12, 2006, at the request of the Hawai’i Island Burial Council and Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei, the human remains were loaned to Pu’uhonua o Honaunau National Historical Park so that the iwi would be on Hawaiian soil pending a determination of its cultural affiliation and completion of the repatriation process. No known individual was identified. No associated funerary objects are present. The human remains have been identified as Native Hawaiian based on the specific cultural and geographic attribution identified in the museum records. Museum documentation identifies the human remains as those of a male ‘‘Hawaiian’’ whose approximate age is 50 years old and also attributes the human remains to ‘‘Sandwich Island.’’ Scholarly publications and consultation information indicate the term ‘‘Sandwich Island’’ or ‘‘Sandwich Islands’’ refers to the Hawaiian Islands. The term was bestowed upon the Hawaiian Islands by Captain James Cook upon his arrival in the Hawaiian archipelago on January 18, 1778. Subsequently, the indigenous people of VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:45 Oct 30, 2007 Jkt 214001 the Hawaiian Islands were often referred to as ‘‘Sandwich Islanders.’’ The term ‘‘Sandwich Island’’ fell into disuse in the late 19th century, however, the use of the term supports the identification of this individual as a Native Hawaiian. The morphology of this individual is not inconsistent with its identification as a Native Hawaiian. Officials of The Wistar Institute and University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (9–10), the human remains described above represent the physical remains of one individual of Native Hawaiian ancestry. Officials of The Wistar Institute and University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the Native Hawaiian human remains and the Hawai’i Island Burial Council, Hui Malama I Na Kupuna ’O Hawaii Nei, Kauai/Niihau Island Burial Council, Maui/Lani Island Burial Council, Molokai Island Burial Council, O’ahu Island Burial Council, and Office of Hawaiian Affairs. Representatives of any other Native Hawaiian Organization or Indian tribe that believes itself to be culturally affiliated with the human remains should contact Dr. Gerald Margolis, Interim Director, University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 3260 South Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104–6324, telephone (215) 898–4050, before November 30, 2007. Repatriation of the Native Hawaiian human remains to the Hawai’i Island Burial Council, Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei, Kauai/Niihau Island Burial Council, Maui/Lani Island Burial Council, Molokai Island Burial Council, O’ahu Island Burial Council, and the Office of Hawaiian Affairs may proceed after that date if no additional claimants come forward. The University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology is responsible for notifying the Hawai’i Island Burial Council, Hui Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawai’i Nei, Kauai/Niihau Island Burial Council, Maui/Lani Island Burial Council, Molokai Island Burial Council, O’ahu Island Burial Council, and Office of Hawaiian Affairs that this notice has been published. Dated: September 10, 2007. Sherry Hutt, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. E7–21380 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–50–S PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–404–408 and 731–TA–898–902 and 904–908 (Review)] Hot-Rolled Steel Products From Argentina, China, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Romania, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the countervailing duty orders on hot-rolled steel products from India, Indonesia, and Thailand and the antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled steel products from China, India, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission also determines that revocation of the countervailing duty orders on hot-rolled steel products from Argentina and South Africa and the antidumping duty orders on hotrolled steel products from Argentina, Kazakhstan, Romania, and South Africa would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.2 Background The Commission instituted these reviews on August 1, 2006 (71 FR 43521) and determined on November 6, 2006 that it would conduct full reviews (71 FR 37366, November 21, 2006). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on January 29, 2007 (72 FR 2556)(as revised, 72 FR 13123, March 20, 2007). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on July 31 and August 1, 2007, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.2(f)). 2 Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane dissenting with respect to Argentina, Kazakhstan, Romania, and South Africa. Commissioner Dean A. Pinkert dissenting with respect to Kazakhstan, Romania, and South Africa. E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM 31OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 31, 2007 / Notices The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on October 25, 2007. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3956 (October 2007), entitled Hot-Rolled Steel Products from Argentina, China, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Romania, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–404–408 and 731–TA–898–902 and 904–908 (Review). assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. By order of the Commission. Issued: October 25, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–21337 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am] Background.—The final phase of this investigation is being scheduled as a result of an affirmative preliminary determination by the Department of Commerce that imports of sodium hexametaphosphate from China are being sold in the United States at less than fair value within the meaning of section 733 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b). The investigation was requested in a petition filed on February 8, 2007, by ICL Performance Products, LP (St. Louis, MO) and Innophos, Inc. (Cranbury, NJ). Participation in the investigation and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the final phase of this investigation as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days prior to the hearing date specified in this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance during the preliminary phase of the investigation need not file an additional notice of appearance during this final phase. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the investigation. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in the final phase of this investigation available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the investigation, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days prior to the hearing date specified in this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. § 1677(9), who are parties to the investigation. A party granted access to BPI in the preliminary phase of the investigation need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1110 (Final)] Sodium Hexametaphosphate From China United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Scheduling of the final phase of an antidumping investigation. rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of the final phase of antidumping investigation No. 731–TA–1110 (Final) under section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act) to determine whether an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of less-than-fair-value imports from China of sodium hexametaphosphate, provided for in subheading 2835.39.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. For further information concerning the conduct of this phase of the investigation, hearing procedures, and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207). DATES: Effective Date: September 14, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debra Baker (202–205–3180), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:45 Oct 30, 2007 Jkt 214001 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 61677 Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Staff report.—The prehearing staff report in the final phase of this investigation will be placed in the nonpublic record on January 9, 2008, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.22 of the Commission’s rules. Hearing.—The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with the final phase of this investigation beginning at 9:30 a.m. on January 24, 2008, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before January 15, 2008. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission’s deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should attend a prehearing conference to be held at 9:30 a.m. on January 17, 2008, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Oral testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), and 207.24 of the Commission’s rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their hearing testimony in camera no later than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing. Written submissions.—Each party who is an interested party shall submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of section 207.23 of the Commission’s rules; the deadline for filing is January 16, 2008. Parties may also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, as provided in section 207.24 of the Commission’s rules, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section 207.25 of the Commission’s rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is January 31, 2008; witness testimony must be filed no later than three days before the hearing. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to the investigation may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of the investigation, including statements of support or opposition to the petition, on or before January 31, 2008. On February 15, 2008, the Commission will make available to parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or before February 20, 2008, but such final comments must not contain new factual E:\FR\FM\31OCN1.SGM 31OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61676-61677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21337]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-404-408 and 731-TA-898-902 and 904-908 
(Review)]


Hot-Rolled Steel Products From Argentina, China, India, 
Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Romania, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and 
Ukraine

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the countervailing duty orders on 
hot-rolled steel products from India, Indonesia, and Thailand and the 
antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled steel products from China, India, 
Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission also 
determines that revocation of the countervailing duty orders on hot-
rolled steel products from Argentina and South Africa and the 
antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled steel products from Argentina, 
Kazakhstan, Romania, and South Africa would not be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Sec.  207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane dissenting with respect to 
Argentina, Kazakhstan, Romania, and South Africa. Commissioner Dean 
A. Pinkert dissenting with respect to Kazakhstan, Romania, and South 
Africa.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on August 1, 2006 (71 FR 
43521) and determined on November 6, 2006 that it would conduct full 
reviews (71 FR 37366, November 21, 2006). Notice of the scheduling of 
the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in 
connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
January 29, 2007 (72 FR 2556)(as revised, 72 FR 13123, March 20, 2007). 
The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on July 31 and August 1, 2007, 
and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear 
in person or by counsel.

[[Page 61677]]

    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on October 25, 2007. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3956 (October 2007), 
entitled Hot-Rolled Steel Products from Argentina, China, India, 
Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Romania, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and 
Ukraine: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-404-408 and 731-TA-898-902 and 904-
908 (Review).

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: October 25, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E7-21337 Filed 10-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P