Molon Motor and Coil Corporation, El Paso, TX; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 60911-60912 [E7-21187]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 207 / Friday, October 26, 2007 / Notices
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) and Section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. The firm does not have a
significant number of workers 50 years
of age or older.
TA–W–62,205; Gemtron Corporation,
Holland, MI.
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
None.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
None.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–62,033; Textile Arts and Film,
Inc., Chester, SC.
TA–W–62,102; Network Appliance, Inc.,
Sunnyvale, CA.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under Section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Oct 25, 2007
Jkt 214001
TA–W–62,176; First American Title
Insurance Co, Eagle Production
Center, Flint, MI.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned
determinations were issued during the period
of October 9 through October 12, 2007.
Copies of these determinations are available
for inspection in Room C–5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during
normal business hours or will be mailed to
persons who write to the above address.
Dated: October 19, 2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–21184 Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am]
60911
a company official on behalf of workers
of Manpower Incorporated, Spring Lake,
Michigan.
All workers of the subject firm are
covered by a certification of eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance
and alternative trade adjustment
assistance under petition number TA–
W–61,530 (amended), that does not
expire until August 23, 2009.
Consequently, further investigation in
this case would serve no purpose and
the investigation under this petition has
been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day
of October 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–21189 Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Employment and Training
Administration
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA–W–61,983]
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,267]
Lamplight Farms, Menomonee Falls,
WI; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on October 9,
2007 in response to a petition filed by
a company official on behalf of workers
of Lamplight Farms, Menomonee Falls,
Wisconsin.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of
October 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–21190 Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–62,253]
Manpower Incorporated, Loveland, CO;
Notice of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on October 4,
2007 in response to a petition filed by
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Molon Motor and Coil Corporation, El
Paso, TX; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated September 17,
2007, the petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department’s negative determination
regarding eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA),
applicable to workers and former
workers of the subject firm. The denial
notice was signed on September 7, 2007
and published in the Federal Register
on September 21, 2007 (72 FR 54076).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The petition for the workers of Molon
Motor and Coil Corporation, El Paso,
Texas engaged in production of vacuum
cleaner motors was denied because the
‘‘contributed importantly’’ group
eligibility requirement of Section 222 of
the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, was
not met. The ‘‘contributed importantly’’
test is generally demonstrated through a
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
60912
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 207 / Friday, October 26, 2007 / Notices
survey of the workers’ firm’s declining
customers. The investigation revealed
that all vacuum cleaner motors
produced by the subject firm were
exported to Mexico and the subject firm
had no domestic customers. The
investigation further revealed that there
was no shift in production from that
firm to a foreign country nor did the
subject firm import vacuum cleaner
motors in 2005, 2006 and January
through July 2007.
The petitioner attached a letter from
the subject firm’s customer indicating
that this customer ‘‘discontinued use of
the Molon motors in favor of an Asian
sourced motor’’ and that this customer
‘‘was the sole customer using the motors
produced’’ at the subject firm.
The Department contacted the sole
customer of the subject firm for further
clarification. The customer confirmed
that even though his firm is a U.S. based
company, the production facility for
which the vacuum cleaner motors were
purchased is located in Mexico. The
customer stated that all vacuum cleaner
motors purchased from the subject firm
were shipped directly to the Mexican
facility and thus were exports. This
facility in Mexico is now purchasing
vacuum cleaner motors from Asia and
there was no increase in imports of
vacuum cleaner motors into the United
States by this customer. Therefore, the
loss of business at the subject firm is
attributed to a loss in export sales.
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of
October, 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–21187 Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am]
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Signed at Washington, DC this 23rd day of
October 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–21186 Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–61,555]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
National Braid Manufacturing Co., Also
Known As Long Island City Trim, Long
Island City, NY; Amended Certification
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on June 15, 2007, applicable
to workers of National Braid
Manufacturing Co., Long Island City,
New York. The notice was published in
the Federal Register on June 28, 2007
(72 FR 35516).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers were engaged in the production
of trimmings for textiles.
New information shows that the
correct name of the subject firm should
read National Braid Manufacturing Co.,
also known as Long Island City Trim.
Workers separated from employment at
the subject firm had their wages
reported under a separate
unemployment insurance (UI) tax
accounts for National Braid
Manufacturing Co., also known as Long
Island City Trim.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending this certification to correctly
identify the name of the subject firm.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
National Braid Manufacturing Co., Long
Island City, New York, who were
adversely affected by increased
company imports of trimmings for
textiles.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–61,555 is hereby issued as
follows:
‘‘All workers of National Braid
Manufacturing Co., also known as Long
Island City Trim, Long Island City, New
York, who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after May
15, 2006, through June 15, 2009, are eligible
to apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
also eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Oct 25, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Permit Application Received
Under the Antarctic Conservation Act
of 1978
National Science Foundation.
Notice of permit applications
received under the Antarctic
Conservation Act.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the National Science Foundation (NSF)
has received a waste management
permit application for operation of a
remote field support and emergency
provisions helicopter flight seeing for
the Motor Vessel, Octopus for the 2006–
2007 austral summer season. The
application is submitted to NSF
pursuant to regulations issued under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.
DATES: Interested parties are invited to
submit written data, comments, or
views with respect to this permit
application by November 26, 2007.
Permit applications may be inspected by
interested parties at the Permit Office,
address below.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
addressed to Permit Office, Room 755,
Office of Polar Programs, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Polly A. Penhale, Environmental
Officer, at the above address or (703)
292–8030.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NSF’s
Antarctic Waste Regulation, 45 CFR part
671, requires all U.S. citizens and
entities to obtain a permit for the use or
release of a designated pollutant in
Antarctica, and for the release of waste
in Antarctica. NSF has received a permit
application under this Regulation for a
team of eight traveling with the S/V
Pelagic Australis that will spend four
weeks traveling by sailboat, sea kayak,
and foot along the northeastern coast of
the Antarctic Peninsula and certain
outlying islands. Some camping ashore
will occur and any and all trash
generated will be returned to the Pelagic
for disposal in accordance with the
vessel’s permitted procedures. Fuel for
cook stoves will be transferred to
appropriate fuel bottles prior to leaving
South America. Any batteries taken
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 207 (Friday, October 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60911-60912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21187]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-61,983]
Molon Motor and Coil Corporation, El Paso, TX; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated September 17, 2007, the petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the
subject firm. The denial notice was signed on September 7, 2007 and
published in the Federal Register on September 21, 2007 (72 FR 54076).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The petition for the workers of Molon Motor and Coil Corporation,
El Paso, Texas engaged in production of vacuum cleaner motors was
denied because the ``contributed importantly'' group eligibility
requirement of Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, was
not met. The ``contributed importantly'' test is generally demonstrated
through a
[[Page 60912]]
survey of the workers' firm's declining customers. The investigation
revealed that all vacuum cleaner motors produced by the subject firm
were exported to Mexico and the subject firm had no domestic customers.
The investigation further revealed that there was no shift in
production from that firm to a foreign country nor did the subject firm
import vacuum cleaner motors in 2005, 2006 and January through July
2007.
The petitioner attached a letter from the subject firm's customer
indicating that this customer ``discontinued use of the Molon motors in
favor of an Asian sourced motor'' and that this customer ``was the sole
customer using the motors produced'' at the subject firm.
The Department contacted the sole customer of the subject firm for
further clarification. The customer confirmed that even though his firm
is a U.S. based company, the production facility for which the vacuum
cleaner motors were purchased is located in Mexico. The customer stated
that all vacuum cleaner motors purchased from the subject firm were
shipped directly to the Mexican facility and thus were exports. This
facility in Mexico is now purchasing vacuum cleaner motors from Asia
and there was no increase in imports of vacuum cleaner motors into the
United States by this customer. Therefore, the loss of business at the
subject firm is attributed to a loss in export sales.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of October, 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-21187 Filed 10-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P