Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 60909-60911 [E7-21184]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 207 / Friday, October 26, 2007 / Notices applicable to workers of Benchmark Electronics, Inc., Loveland Division, including on-site leased workers from Volt Services Group, Loveland, Colorado. The notice was published in the Federal Register on November 16, 2006 (71 FR 66799). At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in the production (assemble, test, etc.) of flash memory test systems. New information shows that when Benchmark Electronics, Inc., Loveland Division, closed in November 2006, a customer, Verigy US Development, retained the on-site leased workers from Volt Services Group to complete their outstanding orders of flash memory test systems. Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to include on-site leased workers who were retained by Verigy US Development. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of Benchmark Electronics, Inc., Loveland Division who were adversely affected by increased customer imports. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–60,023 is hereby issued as follows: ‘‘All workers of Benchmark Electronics, Inc., Loveland Division, including on-site leased workers from Volt Services Group who were retained by Verigy US Development, Loveland, Colorado, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after September 6, 2005, through October 27, 2008, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’ Signed at Washington, DC this 17th day of October 2007. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–21185 Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am] rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:23 Oct 25, 2007 Signed at Washington, DC this 23rd day of October 2007. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–21188 Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–62,073] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America, Rushville Indiana Operations Including On-Site Leased Workers of Personnel Management, Inc. and Penmack Rushville, Indiana; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on October 11, 2007, applicable to workers of Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America, Rushville Indiana Operations, including on-site leased workers of Personnel Management, Inc., Rushville, Indiana. The notice will be published soon in the Federal Register. At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of automotive electronic controls. The review of the investigation record shows that the Department inadvertently excluded from the certification on-site leased workers from Penmack. Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to include on-site leased workers from Penmack. The workers of Penmack at the Rushville site are sufficiently under the control of Fujitsu Corporation of America to be considered leased workers. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–62,073 is hereby issued as follows: ‘‘All workers of Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America, Rushville Indiana Operations, including on-site leased workers of Personnel Management, Inc. and Penmack, Rushville, Indiana, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after August 28, 2006, through October 11, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’ Jkt 214001 60909 PO 00000 Frm 00114 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA–W) number issued during the period of October 9 through October 12, 2007. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. there has been a shift in production by such workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1 rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES 60910 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 207 / Friday, October 26, 2007 / Notices C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. the country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) the workers’ firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and (3) either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) a loss or business by the workers’ firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers’ firm are 50 years of age or older. 2. Whether the workers in the workers’ firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:23 Oct 25, 2007 Jkt 214001 3. The competitive conditions within the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions within the industry are adverse). Affirmative Determinations For Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. None. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been met. Ta–W–62,205; Gemtron Corporation, Holland, MI: November 11, 2007. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. None. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been met. None. Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–61,978; PCS Company, Pins Department, Federal Signal Corp, Fraser, MI: July 30, 2006. TA–W–62,053; Sunrise Medical Incorporation, Devilbiss Healthcare, Kelly Services, Somerset, PA: August 27, 2006. TA–W–62,116; U.S. Textile Corporation, Newland, NC: September 8, 2007. TA–W–62,157; Johnston Textiles, Inc., Micolas Division, Opp, AL: September 17, 2006. TA–W–62,219; Creative Interiors, aka TFI Carysbrook Plant, Fork Union, VA: September 27, 2006. PO 00000 Frm 00115 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 TA–W–62,250; Vaughan Furniture Company, Inc., Galax, VA: October 3, 2006. TA–W–61,871; Dirigo Paper Company, Prometheus Power Co, Gilman, VT: July 23, 2006. TA–W–62,016; Mohawk Industries, Inc., Karastan Division, On-Site Leased Workers From Ameristaff, Eden, NC: August 20, 2006. TA–W–62,138; Maine Fence Company, World Wide Personnel/ASMARA Human Resources, Pittsfield, ME: September 11, 2006. TA–W–62,176; First American Title Insurance Co, Eagle Production Center, Flint, MI. TA–W–62,262; Summit Switching, Working On-Site At Ford Motor Company, Chesapeake, VA: October 4, 2006. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–62,073; Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America, Rushville Indiana Operations, On-Site Leased Workers of Personnel Management, Rushville, IN: August 28, 2006. TA–W–62,074; Playtex Puerto Rico/Sara Lee Branded Apparel, Vega Baja, PR: August 29, 2006. TA–W–62,078; Colgate Palmolive, Inc., Guayama, PR: August 29, 2006. TA–W–62,201; Head Lites Corp, Woodbury, MN: September 25, 2006. TA–W–62,248; ArvinMeritor, Gabriel Ride Control Division, Chickasha, OK: October 3, 2006. TA–W–62,261; American Uniform Company, Headquarters/Cleveland Div., Cleveland, TN: December 4, 2006. TA–W–62,059; M/A-Com, Inc., A Division of Tyco Electronics, IC Department & Component Group Department, Lowell, MA: August 24, 2006. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–62,032; DGS Stampings, Inc., Cleveland, OH: August 15, 2006. TA–W–62,140; R.E. Phelon Company, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers From Aiken Staffing and Manpower, Aiken, SC: September 11, 2006. TA–W–62,140A; Manufacturing Performance Services, LLC, Aiken, SC: September 11, 2006. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 207 / Friday, October 26, 2007 / Notices 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. None. rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50 years of age or older. TA–W–62,205; Gemtron Corporation, Holland, MI. The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. None. The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been met. Competition conditions within the workers’ industry are not adverse. None. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met. None. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. None. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA–W–62,033; Textile Arts and Film, Inc., Chester, SC. TA–W–62,102; Network Appliance, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA. The workers’ firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:23 Oct 25, 2007 Jkt 214001 TA–W–62,176; First American Title Insurance Co, Eagle Production Center, Flint, MI. The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified eligible to apply for TAA. None. I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of October 9 through October 12, 2007. Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C–5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. Dated: October 19, 2007. Ralph DiBattista, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–21184 Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am] 60911 a company official on behalf of workers of Manpower Incorporated, Spring Lake, Michigan. All workers of the subject firm are covered by a certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance and alternative trade adjustment assistance under petition number TA– W–61,530 (amended), that does not expire until August 23, 2009. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose and the investigation under this petition has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of October 2007. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–21189 Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR [TA–W–61,983] Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–62,267] Lamplight Farms, Menomonee Falls, WI; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 9, 2007 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Lamplight Farms, Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin. The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of October 2007. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–21190 Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–62,253] Manpower Incorporated, Loveland, CO; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 4, 2007 in response to a petition filed by PO 00000 Frm 00116 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Molon Motor and Coil Corporation, El Paso, TX; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated September 17, 2007, the petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department’s negative determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The denial notice was signed on September 7, 2007 and published in the Federal Register on September 21, 2007 (72 FR 54076). Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; (2) if it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or (3) if in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The petition for the workers of Molon Motor and Coil Corporation, El Paso, Texas engaged in production of vacuum cleaner motors was denied because the ‘‘contributed importantly’’ group eligibility requirement of Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, was not met. The ‘‘contributed importantly’’ test is generally demonstrated through a E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 207 (Friday, October 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60909-60911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment 
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of October 
9 through October 12, 2007.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
    I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
    A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or 
partially separated;
    B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision 
have decreased absolutely; and
    C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with 
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed 
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to 
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
    II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
    A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or 
partially separated;
    B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or 
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly 
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or 
subdivision; and

[[Page 60910]]

    C. One of the following must be satisfied:
    1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of 
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United 
States;
    2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of 
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference 
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin 
Economic Recovery Act; or
    3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of 
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are 
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
    Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for 
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' 
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or 
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially 
separated;
    (2) the workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream 
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers 
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade 
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related 
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
    (3) either--
    (A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) 
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the 
workers' firm; or
    (B) a loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or 
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the 
workers' separation or threat of separation.
    In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a 
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements 
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
    1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 
50 years of age or older.
    2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are 
not easily transferable.
    3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e., 
conditions within the industry are adverse).

Affirmative Determinations For Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been 
met.
    None.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

Ta-W-62,205; Gemtron Corporation, Holland, MI: November 11, 2007.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
    None.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are 
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or 
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been 
met.
    None.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-61,978; PCS Company, Pins Department, Federal Signal Corp, Fraser, 
MI: July 30, 2006.
TA-W-62,053; Sunrise Medical Incorporation, Devilbiss Healthcare, Kelly 
Services, Somerset, PA: August 27, 2006.
TA-W-62,116; U.S. Textile Corporation, Newland, NC: September 8, 2007.
TA-W-62,157; Johnston Textiles, Inc., Micolas Division, Opp, AL: 
September 17, 2006.
TA-W-62,219; Creative Interiors, aka TFI Carysbrook Plant, Fork Union, 
VA: September 27, 2006.
TA-W-62,250; Vaughan Furniture Company, Inc., Galax, VA: October 3, 
2006.
TA-W-61,871; Dirigo Paper Company, Prometheus Power Co, Gilman, VT: 
July 23, 2006.
TA-W-62,016; Mohawk Industries, Inc., Karastan Division, On-Site Leased 
Workers From Ameristaff, Eden, NC: August 20, 2006.
TA-W-62,138; Maine Fence Company, World Wide Personnel/ASMARA Human 
Resources, Pittsfield, ME: September 11, 2006.
TA-W-62,176; First American Title Insurance Co, Eagle Production 
Center, Flint, MI.
TA-W-62,262; Summit Switching, Working On-Site At Ford Motor Company, 
Chesapeake, VA: October 4, 2006.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-62,073; Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America, Rushville Indiana 
Operations, On-Site Leased Workers of Personnel Management, Rushville, 
IN: August 28, 2006.
TA-W-62,074; Playtex Puerto Rico/Sara Lee Branded Apparel, Vega Baja, 
PR: August 29, 2006.
TA-W-62,078; Colgate Palmolive, Inc., Guayama, PR: August 29, 2006.
TA-W-62,201; Head Lites Corp, Woodbury, MN: September 25, 2006.
TA-W-62,248; ArvinMeritor, Gabriel Ride Control Division, Chickasha, 
OK: October 3, 2006.
TA-W-62,261; American Uniform Company, Headquarters/Cleveland Div., 
Cleveland, TN: December 4, 2006.
TA-W-62,059; M/A-Com, Inc., A Division of Tyco Electronics, IC 
Department & Component Group Department, Lowell, MA: August 24, 2006.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 
been met.

TA-W-62,032; DGS Stampings, Inc., Cleveland, OH: August 15, 2006.
TA-W-62,140; R.E. Phelon Company, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers From 
Aiken Staffing and Manpower, Aiken, SC: September 11, 2006.
TA-W-62,140A; Manufacturing Performance Services, LLC, Aiken, SC: 
September 11, 2006.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section

[[Page 60911]]

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified 
eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in 
production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the 
Trade Act have been met.
    None.

Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, it has been determined that the 
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons 
specified.
    The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has 
not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50 
years of age or older.

TA-W-62,205; Gemtron Corporation, Holland, MI.

    The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has 
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily 
transferable.
    None.
    The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has 
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are 
not adverse.
    None.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met 
for the reasons specified.
    Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, 
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and 
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.
    None.
    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 
production to a foreign country) have not been met.

    None.
    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign 
country) have not been met.

TA-W-62,033; Textile Arts and Film, Inc., Chester, SC.
TA-W-62,102; Network Appliance, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA.

    The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for 
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA-W-62,176; First American Title Insurance Co, Eagle Production 
Center, Flint, MI. 
    The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has 
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to 
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified 
eligible to apply for TAA.
    None.

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were 
issued during the period of October 9 through October 12, 2007. 
Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room 
C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed 
to persons who write to the above address.

    Dated: October 19, 2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-21184 Filed 10-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P