Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission In Part, 60638 [E7-21039]
Download as PDF
60638
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 206 / Thursday, October 25, 2007 / Notices
ITC Notification
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
In accordance with section 735(d) of
the Act, we have notified the ITC of our
final determination. As our final
determination is affirmative, the ITC
will determine within 45 days whether
imports of the subject merchandise are
causing material injury, or threat of
material injury, to an industry in the
United States. If the ITC determines that
material injury or threat of injury does
not exist, the proceeding will be
terminated and all securities posted will
be refunded or canceled. If the ITC
determines that such injury does exist,
the Department will issue an
antidumping duty order directing CBP
to assess antidumping duties on all
imports of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the effective
date of the suspension of liquidation.
Return or Destruction of Proprietary
Information
Dated: October 17, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix—Issues in Decision Memo
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Comments
Issue 1: Whether to Adjust Export Price
for Amounts Paid by TK to an
Unaffiliated Company
Issue 2: Application of Major Input Rule
to Logs Used to Produce Pulp by IK
Issue 3: Application of Major Input Rule
to Pulp Produced by Lontar
Issue 4: Selection of Market Price Used
for Testing of Purchases of Pulp from
Lontar
Issue 5: Application of Transactions
Disregarded Rule for Purchases of
Electricity
Issue 6: Treatment of Miscellaneous
Expenses in Financial Expense
Calculation
[FR Doc. E7–21042 Filed 10–24–07; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:26 Oct 24, 2007
Jkt 214001
(A–533–840)
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
from India: Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Rescission In Part
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 25, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3874.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
This notice will serve as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this
determination and notice in accordance
with sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the
Act.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
International Trade Administration
In accordance with sections 751(a)(1)
and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), on September 12,
2007, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published its notice of final
results of antidumping duty
administrative review on certain frozen
warmwater shrimp from India. See
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from
India: Final Results and Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 72 FR 52055
(Sept. 12, 2007) (Final Results). On
October 12, 2007, we received an
allegation from Lotus Sea Farms (Lotus),
a respondent in this proceeding, that the
Department made a ministerial error
with respect to the rate assigned to it in
the final results.
Although we received Lotus’s
ministerial error allegation after the
normal deadline for filing ministerial
error allegations (see 19 CFR
351.224(c)(2),(4)), we find good cause to
extend the deadline for filing a
ministerial error allegation to the date
we received the request and allegation
from Lotus. See 19 CFR 351.302(b).
After analyzing Lotus’s submission, we
have determined, in accordance with
section 751(h) of the Act, that we made
a ministerial error in the final results
when we assigned the adverse facts
available (AFA) rate to Lotus because
we believed that it had failed to submit
a response to the Department’s quantity
and value (Q&V) questionnaire when, in
fact, it had done so. Therefore, because:
1) Lotus responded to the Department’s
request for Q&V information in this
administrative review; and 2) the
evidence on the record does not indicate
that Lotus exported subject merchandise
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to the United States during the POR, we
are rescinding the administrative review
for it.
Amended Final Results of Review and
Rescission in Part
We have determined, in accordance
with section 751(h) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.224(e), that the Department
made a ministerial error in the final
results by assigning Lotus the AFA rate
when Lotus did indeed respond to the
Department’s request for Q&V
information. In addition, because the
evidence on the record of this
administrative review does not indicate
that Lotus exported subject merchandise
during the POR, we are rescinding the
administrative review for it. For a
detailed discussion of this ministerial
error, the Department’s finding of good
cause to extend the deadline for filing
a ministerial error allegation, and the
Department’s analysis, see the October
16, 2007, memorandum to James
Maeder from Elizabeth Eastwood
entitled, ‘‘Ministerial Error Allegation
Regarding Lotus Sea Farms in the Final
Results of the 2004–2006 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review of Certain
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India.’’
Therefore, we are amending the final
results of administrative review of
certain frozen warmwater shrimp from
India for the period August 4, 2004,
through January 31, 2006. As a result of
correcting the ministerial error
discussed above, we are rescinding this
administrative review with respect to
Lotus, and we will notify U.S. Customs
and Border Protection of this rescission.
For the remaining respondents, the
weighted–average dumping margins
remain the same. See Final Results.
We are issuing and publishing this
determination and notice in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: October 19, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–21039 Filed 10–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 206 (Thursday, October 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 60638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21039]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A-533-840)
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India: Amended Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission In Part
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 25, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3874.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), on September 12, 2007, the
Department of Commerce (the Department) published its notice of final
results of antidumping duty administrative review on certain frozen
warmwater shrimp from India. See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from
India: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 72 FR 52055 (Sept. 12, 2007) (Final Results). On
October 12, 2007, we received an allegation from Lotus Sea Farms
(Lotus), a respondent in this proceeding, that the Department made a
ministerial error with respect to the rate assigned to it in the final
results.
Although we received Lotus's ministerial error allegation after the
normal deadline for filing ministerial error allegations (see 19 CFR
351.224(c)(2),(4)), we find good cause to extend the deadline for
filing a ministerial error allegation to the date we received the
request and allegation from Lotus. See 19 CFR 351.302(b). After
analyzing Lotus's submission, we have determined, in accordance with
section 751(h) of the Act, that we made a ministerial error in the
final results when we assigned the adverse facts available (AFA) rate
to Lotus because we believed that it had failed to submit a response to
the Department's quantity and value (Q&V) questionnaire when, in fact,
it had done so. Therefore, because: 1) Lotus responded to the
Department's request for Q&V information in this administrative review;
and 2) the evidence on the record does not indicate that Lotus exported
subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, we are
rescinding the administrative review for it.
Amended Final Results of Review and Rescission in Part
We have determined, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.224(e), that the Department made a ministerial error in
the final results by assigning Lotus the AFA rate when Lotus did indeed
respond to the Department's request for Q&V information. In addition,
because the evidence on the record of this administrative review does
not indicate that Lotus exported subject merchandise during the POR, we
are rescinding the administrative review for it. For a detailed
discussion of this ministerial error, the Department's finding of good
cause to extend the deadline for filing a ministerial error allegation,
and the Department's analysis, see the October 16, 2007, memorandum to
James Maeder from Elizabeth Eastwood entitled, ``Ministerial Error
Allegation Regarding Lotus Sea Farms in the Final Results of the 2004-
2006 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater
Shrimp from India.''
Therefore, we are amending the final results of administrative
review of certain frozen warmwater shrimp from India for the period
August 4, 2004, through January 31, 2006. As a result of correcting the
ministerial error discussed above, we are rescinding this
administrative review with respect to Lotus, and we will notify U.S.
Customs and Border Protection of this rescission. For the remaining
respondents, the weighted-average dumping margins remain the same. See
Final Results.
We are issuing and publishing this determination and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 19, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-21039 Filed 10-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S