Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Allow the Exchange To List Up to Seven Expiration Months for Broad-Based Security Index Options Upon Which the Exchange Calculates a Constant Three-Month Volatility Index, 58694-58696 [E7-20361]
Download as PDF
58694
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Notices
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
Amex’s principal office and on Amex’s
Web site (https://www.amex.com). All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex–2007–56 and should
be submitted on or before November 6,
2007.
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation pursuant to delegated
authority.4
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–20363 Filed 10–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–56632; File No. SR–CBOE–
2007–82]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a
Proposed Rule Change as Modified by
Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Allow the
Exchange To List Up to Seven
Expiration Months for Broad-Based
Security Index Options Upon Which
the Exchange Calculates a Constant
Three-Month Volatility Index
mmaher on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
October 9, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 17,
2007, the Chicago Board Options
4 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Aug<31>2005
04:12 Oct 16, 2007
Jkt 214001
Exchange, Incorporated ( ‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
substantially prepared by the Exchange.
On September 19, 2007, CBOE filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended, from
interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 24.9(a)(2), Terms of Index Option
Contracts, to allow the Exchange to list
up to seven expiration months for
broad-based security index options
upon which the Exchange calculates a
constant three-month volatility index.
The Exchange also proposes to remove
outdated rule text from Rule 24.9(a)(2).
The text of the rule proposal is available
on the Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.cboe.org/legal), at the Exchange’s
Office of the Secretary, and at the
Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
CBOE included statements concerning
the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. CBOE has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this rule filing is to
amend Rule 24.9(a)(2), Terms of Index
Options, to allow the Exchange to list
up to seven expiration months for
broad-based security index options
upon which the Exchange calculates a
constant three-month volatility index.
Currently, Rule 24.9(a)(2) permits the
Exchange to list only six expiration
months in any index options at any one
time.
Volatility products offer investors a
unique set of tools for speculating and
hedging. For example, CBOE Volatility
Index (‘‘VIX’’) options, first introduced
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in February 2006, have proven to be one
of the Exchange’s most successful new
products ever listed, currently averaging
over 90,000 contracts traded per day.
The Exchange plans to introduce new
volatility products and new volatility
indexes in the near future. One such
index is the CBOE S&P 500 ThreeMonth Volatility Index (‘‘VXV’’).3
Similar to the VIX, the VXV is a
measure of S&P 500 implied volatility—
the volatility implied by S&P option
prices—but instead of reflecting a
constant 1-month implied volatility
period, VXV is designed to reflect the
implied volatility of an option with a
constant 3 months to expiration. Since
there is only one day on which an
option has exactly 3 months to
expiration, VXV is calculated as a
weighted average of options expiring
immediately before and immediately
after the three-month standard.
Accordingly, the Exchange would need
to use four consecutive expiration
months in order to calculate a constant
three-month volatility index.
Under the current application of
CBOE Rule 24.9(a)(2), the Exchange
generally lists three consecutive near
term months and three months on a
quarterly expiration cycle. One of the
three consecutive near term months is
always a quarterly month; however, that
near term contract month (which is also
a quarterly month) is not included as
part of the three months listed on a
quarterly expiration cycle. Therefore, in
order to permit the addition of four
consecutive near term months under
current Rule 24.9(a)(2), the Exchange
would only be able to list two months
on a quarterly expiration cycle. Because
of customer demand and other
investment strategy reasons for having
three months on a quarterly expiration
cycle, the Exchange is seeking to
increase, from six to seven, the number
of expiration months for broad-based
security index options upon which the
Exchange calculates a constant threemonth volatility index.
Without this proposed rule change, if
the Exchange calculated a three-month
volatility using only three consecutive
near term months, this would result in
the VXV being calculated with options
expiring three months apart about onethird of the time. Another one-third of
the time, VXV would be calculated with
options expiring two months apart. And
the final one-third of the time, VXV
3 The Exchange calculates volatility indexes on
other broad-based security indexes, such as the
Dow Jones Industrial Average index (‘‘DJX’’), the
Nasdaq-100 index (‘‘NDX’’), and the Russell 2000
index (‘‘RUT’’). The Exchange may calculate a
constant three-month volatility index on DJX, NDX
or RUT in the future.
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
58695
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Notices
would be calculated with options
expiring one month apart. As a result,
the calculation of the three-month VXV
under current Rule 24.9(a)(2) would
render the VXV subject to
inconsistencies that may make the index
unattractive as an underlying for
volatility products.
The proposed rule change will permit
the Exchange, eight times a year, to add
an additional seventh month in order to
maintain four consecutive near term
contract months. The following
examples illustrate the need for a
seventh month in order to maintain four
consecutive near term contract months.
In the following examples, ‘‘X’’
represents RUT contract months that
will be listed under the current
application of Rule 24.9(a)(2).
Example 1: After September 2007
expiration, under the proposed rule change,
the Exchange will list January 2008 RUT
contracts in order to have four consecutive
near term contract months.
Consecutive near term months
March quarterly expiration
cycle
7th Month
Oct 07
Nov 07
Dec 07
X
X
X .......................................................................
Example 2: After October 2007 expiration,
under the proposed rule change, the
Exchange will list February 2008 RUT
Mar 08
Jan 08 ...............................................................
June
08
X
Sept
08
X
X
contracts in order to have four consecutive
near term contract months.
Consecutive near term months
March quarterly expiration
cycle
7th Month
Nov 07
Dec 07
Jan 07
X
X
X .......................................................................
Example 3: After November 2007
expiration, the Exchange will not have to add
a seventh RUT contract month because there
Mar 08
Feb 08 ..............................................................
June
08
X
Sept
08
X
X
will already be four consecutive near term
contract months.
Consecutive near term months
March quarterly expiration
cycle
7th Month
Dec 07
Jan 08
Feb 08
X
X
X .......................................................................
Example 4: After December 2007
expiration, under the proposed rule change,
the Exchange will list April 2008 RUT
Mar 08
N/A ....................................................................
contracts in order to have four consecutive
near term contract months, and to maintain
three contract months on the March quarterly
June
08
X
Sept
08
X
X
expiration cycle, the Exchange will list
December 2008 RUT contracts.
Consecutive near term months
March quarterly expiration
cycle
7th Month
Jan 08
Feb 08
Mar 08
X
X
mmaher on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
X .......................................................................
Therefore, the Exchange believes that
the addition of a fourth consecutive
near-term month for broad-based
security index options upon which the
Exchange calculates a constant threemonth volatility index will result in a
consistent calculation in which the
option series that bracket three months
to expiration will always expire one
month apart. In order to accommodate
the listing of a fourth consecutive nearterm month and to maintain the listing
of three months on a quarterly
expiration cycle, the Exchange proposes
VerDate Aug<31>2005
04:12 Oct 16, 2007
Jkt 214001
June
08
April 08 .............................................................
the increase, from six to seven, the
number of expiration months for broadbased security indexes on which the
Exchange calculates a constant threemonth volatility index.
The Exchange also proposes to
remove outdated rule text from Rule
24.9(a)(2). Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to delete the provision that
permitted the Exchange to list up to
seven expiration months at anyone time
for the SPX, MNX and DJX index option
contracts, provided that one of those
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
X
Sept
08
Dec 08
X
X
expiration months is November 2004.4
This allowance has since expired and
should be deleted from the Exchange’s
Rulebook.
4 This provision was added in July 2004 in
response to customer demand for index options
expiring in November 2004 to hedge positions in
stocks overlying particular index options or to
hedge market exposure to the equity markets
generally against the uncertainty presented by the
elections. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
50063 (July 22, 2004), 69 FR 45357 (July 29,
2004)(SR–CBOE–2004–49).
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
58696
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Notices
Capacity
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
CBOE has analyzed its capacity and
represents that it believes the Exchange
and the Options Price Reporting
Authority have the necessary systems
capacity to handle the additional traffic
associated with the additional listing of
a seventh contract month in order to
maintain four consecutive near term
contract months for those broad-based
security index options upon which the
Exchange calculates a constant threemonth volatility index.
2. Statutory Basis
Because the increase in the number of
expiration months is limited to broadbased security indexes upon which the
Exchange calculates a constant threemonth volatility and because the series
could be added without presenting
capacity problems, the Exchange
believes the rule proposal is consistent
with the Act and the rules and
regulations under the Act applicable to
a national securities exchange and, in
particular, the requirements of Section
6(b) of the Act.5 Specifically, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) Act 6 requirements that
the rules of an exchange be designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of purposes
of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposal.
mmaher on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
5 15
6 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
04:12 Oct 16, 2007
Jkt 214001
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2007–82 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2007–82. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of CBOE. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2007–82 and should
be submitted on or before November 6,
2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–20361 Filed 10–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–56633; File No. SR–ISE–
2007–60]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of a
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 4 Thereto, Adopting
Generic Listing Standards for
Exchange-Traded Funds Based on
International or Global Indexes or
Indexes Described in Exchange Rules
Previously Approved by the
Commission as Underlying
Benchmarks for Derivative Securities
October 9, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 12,
2007, the International Securities
Exchange, LLC (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘ISE’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. On August 6, 2007, ISE
submitted Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change. On August 7,
2007, ISE withdrew Amendment No. 1
and filed Amendment No. 2 to the
proposed rule change. On August 15,
2007, ISE filed Amendment No. 3 to the
proposed rule change, and on October 9,
2007, ISE filed Amendment No. 4 to the
proposed rule change.3 This order
provides notice of the proposal, as
amended, and approves the proposal on
an accelerated basis.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
ISE proposes to revise its Rule 2123
to include generic listing standards for
series of Investment Company Units
(‘‘ICUs’’) that are based on U.S. indexes
or portfolios, international or global
7 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Amendment No. 4 replaces and supersedes the
original rule filing and all previous amendments
thereto.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58694-58696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-20361]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-56632; File No. SR-CBOE-2007-82]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change as Modified by
Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Allow the Exchange To List Up to Seven
Expiration Months for Broad-Based Security Index Options Upon Which the
Exchange Calculates a Constant Three-Month Volatility Index
October 9, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 17, 2007, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (
``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially
prepared by the Exchange. On September 19, 2007, CBOE filed Amendment
No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended,
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 24.9(a)(2), Terms of Index
Option Contracts, to allow the Exchange to list up to seven expiration
months for broad-based security index options upon which the Exchange
calculates a constant three-month volatility index. The Exchange also
proposes to remove outdated rule text from Rule 24.9(a)(2). The text of
the rule proposal is available on the Exchange's Web site (https://
www.cboe.org/legal), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, CBOE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. CBOE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this rule filing is to amend Rule 24.9(a)(2), Terms
of Index Options, to allow the Exchange to list up to seven expiration
months for broad-based security index options upon which the Exchange
calculates a constant three-month volatility index. Currently, Rule
24.9(a)(2) permits the Exchange to list only six expiration months in
any index options at any one time.
Volatility products offer investors a unique set of tools for
speculating and hedging. For example, CBOE Volatility Index (``VIX'')
options, first introduced in February 2006, have proven to be one of
the Exchange's most successful new products ever listed, currently
averaging over 90,000 contracts traded per day. The Exchange plans to
introduce new volatility products and new volatility indexes in the
near future. One such index is the CBOE S&P 500 Three-Month Volatility
Index (``VXV'').\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Exchange calculates volatility indexes on other broad-
based security indexes, such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average
index (``DJX''), the Nasdaq-100 index (``NDX''), and the Russell
2000 index (``RUT''). The Exchange may calculate a constant three-
month volatility index on DJX, NDX or RUT in the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similar to the VIX, the VXV is a measure of S&P 500 implied
volatility--the volatility implied by S&P option prices--but instead of
reflecting a constant 1-month implied volatility period, VXV is
designed to reflect the implied volatility of an option with a constant
3 months to expiration. Since there is only one day on which an option
has exactly 3 months to expiration, VXV is calculated as a weighted
average of options expiring immediately before and immediately after
the three-month standard. Accordingly, the Exchange would need to use
four consecutive expiration months in order to calculate a constant
three-month volatility index.
Under the current application of CBOE Rule 24.9(a)(2), the Exchange
generally lists three consecutive near term months and three months on
a quarterly expiration cycle. One of the three consecutive near term
months is always a quarterly month; however, that near term contract
month (which is also a quarterly month) is not included as part of the
three months listed on a quarterly expiration cycle. Therefore, in
order to permit the addition of four consecutive near term months under
current Rule 24.9(a)(2), the Exchange would only be able to list two
months on a quarterly expiration cycle. Because of customer demand and
other investment strategy reasons for having three months on a
quarterly expiration cycle, the Exchange is seeking to increase, from
six to seven, the number of expiration months for broad-based security
index options upon which the Exchange calculates a constant three-month
volatility index.
Without this proposed rule change, if the Exchange calculated a
three-month volatility using only three consecutive near term months,
this would result in the VXV being calculated with options expiring
three months apart about one-third of the time. Another one-third of
the time, VXV would be calculated with options expiring two months
apart. And the final one-third of the time, VXV
[[Page 58695]]
would be calculated with options expiring one month apart. As a result,
the calculation of the three-month VXV under current Rule 24.9(a)(2)
would render the VXV subject to inconsistencies that may make the index
unattractive as an underlying for volatility products.
The proposed rule change will permit the Exchange, eight times a
year, to add an additional seventh month in order to maintain four
consecutive near term contract months. The following examples
illustrate the need for a seventh month in order to maintain four
consecutive near term contract months. In the following examples, ``X''
represents RUT contract months that will be listed under the current
application of Rule 24.9(a)(2).
Example 1: After September 2007 expiration, under the proposed
rule change, the Exchange will list January 2008 RUT contracts in
order to have four consecutive near term contract months.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consecutive near term months March quarterly
---------------------------------------------------------- expiration cycle
7th Month --------------------------
Oct 07 Nov 07 Dec 07 Mar 08 June 08 Sept 08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
X...................................... X X Jan 08.................... X X X
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example 2: After October 2007 expiration, under the proposed
rule change, the Exchange will list February 2008 RUT contracts in
order to have four consecutive near term contract months.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consecutive near term months March quarterly
---------------------------------------------------------- expiration cycle
7th Month --------------------------
Nov 07 Dec 07 Jan 07 Mar 08 June 08 Sept 08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
X...................................... X X Feb 08.................... X X X
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example 3: After November 2007 expiration, the Exchange will not
have to add a seventh RUT contract month because there will already
be four consecutive near term contract months.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consecutive near term months March quarterly
---------------------------------------------------------- expiration cycle
7th Month --------------------------
Dec 07 Jan 08 Feb 08 Mar 08 June 08 Sept 08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
X...................................... X X N/A....................... X X X
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example 4: After December 2007 expiration, under the proposed
rule change, the Exchange will list April 2008 RUT contracts in
order to have four consecutive near term contract months, and to
maintain three contract months on the March quarterly expiration
cycle, the Exchange will list December 2008 RUT contracts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consecutive near term months March quarterly
---------------------------------------------------------- expiration cycle
7th Month --------------------------
Jan 08 Feb 08 Mar 08 June 08 Sept 08 Dec 08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
X...................................... X X April 08.................. X X X
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, the Exchange believes that the addition of a fourth
consecutive near-term month for broad-based security index options upon
which the Exchange calculates a constant three-month volatility index
will result in a consistent calculation in which the option series that
bracket three months to expiration will always expire one month apart.
In order to accommodate the listing of a fourth consecutive near-term
month and to maintain the listing of three months on a quarterly
expiration cycle, the Exchange proposes the increase, from six to
seven, the number of expiration months for broad-based security indexes
on which the Exchange calculates a constant three-month volatility
index.
The Exchange also proposes to remove outdated rule text from Rule
24.9(a)(2). Specifically, the Exchange proposes to delete the provision
that permitted the Exchange to list up to seven expiration months at
anyone time for the SPX, MNX and DJX index option contracts, provided
that one of those expiration months is November 2004.\4\ This allowance
has since expired and should be deleted from the Exchange's Rulebook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ This provision was added in July 2004 in response to
customer demand for index options expiring in November 2004 to hedge
positions in stocks overlying particular index options or to hedge
market exposure to the equity markets generally against the
uncertainty presented by the elections. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 50063 (July 22, 2004), 69 FR 45357 (July 29, 2004)(SR-
CBOE-2004-49).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 58696]]
Capacity
CBOE has analyzed its capacity and represents that it believes the
Exchange and the Options Price Reporting Authority have the necessary
systems capacity to handle the additional traffic associated with the
additional listing of a seventh contract month in order to maintain
four consecutive near term contract months for those broad-based
security index options upon which the Exchange calculates a constant
three-month volatility index.
2. Statutory Basis
Because the increase in the number of expiration months is limited
to broad-based security indexes upon which the Exchange calculates a
constant three-month volatility and because the series could be added
without presenting capacity problems, the Exchange believes the rule
proposal is consistent with the Act and the rules and regulations under
the Act applicable to a national securities exchange and, in
particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\5\
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) Act \6\ requirements that the rules
of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2007-82 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2007-82. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of CBOE. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2007-82 and should be
submitted on or before November 6, 2007.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-20361 Filed 10-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P