Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 58639-58640 [E7-20346]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Notices mmaher on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B)) In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (6)) CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact Carol Booker at (202) 203–4545. received antidumping and countervailing duty petitions filed by Appleton Papers, Inc. (petitioner) on behalf of the domestic industry producing lightweight thermal paper. See Antidumping Duty Petitions on Lightweight Thermal Paper from Germany, the Republic of Korea, and the People’s Republic of China and Countervailing Duty Petition on Lightweight Thermal Paper from the People’s Republic of China (September 19, 2007) (Petitions). Determination of Industry Support for the Petition Section 732(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires that a petition be filed by or on behalf of the domestic industry. Section Dated: October 9, 2007. 732(c)(4)(A) of the Act provides that the Carol Booker, Department’s industry support determination be based on whether a Legal Counsel. [FR Doc. 07–5118 Filed 10–12–07; 12:01 pm] minimum percentage of the relevant industry supports the petition. A BILLING CODE 8610–01–M petition meets this requirement if the domestic producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) at DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE least 25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and (ii) International Trade Administration more than 50 percent of the production (A–428–840, A–580–860, A–570–920, C–570– of the domestic like product produced 921) by that portion of the industry Notice of Extension of the Deadline for expressing support for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section Determining the Adequacy of the 732(c)(4)(D) of the Act provides that, if Antidumping Duty Petitions: the petition does not establish support Lightweight Thermal Paper from of domestic producers or workers Germany, the Republic of Korea, and accounting for more than 50 percent of the People’s Republic of China; and the total production of the domestic like the Countervailing Duty Petition: product, the Department shall: (i) poll Lightweight Thermal Paper from the the industry or rely on other People’s Republic of China information in order to determine if there is support for the petition, as AGENCY: Import Administration, required by subparagraph (A), or (ii) if International Trade Administration, there is a large number of producers, Department of Commerce determine industry support using a EFFECTIVE DATE: October 16, 2007. statistically valid sampling method to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: poll the industry. Minoo Hatten at (202) 482–1690 and Dmitry Vladimirov at (202) 482–0665 Extension of Time (Republic of Korea); Blanche Ziv at Section 732(c)(1)(A)(ii) of the Act (202) 482–4207, Hallie Zink at (202) provides that within 20 days of the 482–6907, and Scott Holland at (202) filing of an antidumping duty petition, 482–1279 (People’s Republic of China), the Department will determine, inter Victoria Cho at (202) 482–5075 and alia, whether the petition has been filed Christopher Hargett at (202) 482–4161 by or on behalf of the U.S. industry (Germany), AD/CVD Operations, Import producing the domestic like product. Administration, International Trade Section 732(c)(1)(B) of the Act provides Administration, U.S. Department of that the deadline for the initiation Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution determination, in exceptional Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. circumstances, may be extended by 20 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: days in any case in which the Department must ‘‘poll or otherwise EXTENSION OF INITIATION OF determine support for the petition by INVESTIGATIONS the industry.’’ Because it is not clear The Petitions from the petition whether the industry support criteria have been met, the On September 19, 2007, the Department has determined to extend Department of Commerce (Department) VerDate Aug<31>2005 04:12 Oct 16, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 58639 the time for initiating an investigation in order to poll the domestic industry. The Department will need additional time to analyze the domestic producers’ responses to the Department’s request for information. Therefore, it is necessary to extend the deadline determining the adequacy of the petition for a period not to exceed 40 days from the filing of the petition. As a result, the initiation determination will now be due no later than October 29, 2007. International Trade Commission Notification The Department will contact the International Trade Commission (ITC) and will make this extension notice available to the ITC. Dated: October 09, 2007. Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E7–20345 Filed 10–15–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration A–533–838 Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: October 16, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun or Richard Rimlinger, AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5760 and (202) 482–4477, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background At the request of an interested party, the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbazole violet pigment 23 from India for the period December 1, 2005, through November 30, 2006. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 72 FR 5005 (February 2, 2007). On August 22, 2007, we extended the due date for the completion of the preliminary results of reviews by 45 E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM 16OCN1 58640 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Notices days. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 72 FR 46954 (August 22, 2007). The preliminary results of the review are currently due no later than October 19, 2007. Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires the Department to make a preliminary determination within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order for which a review is requested and a final determination within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary determination is published. If it is not practicable to complete the review within these time periods, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend the time limit for the preliminary determination to a maximum of 365 days after the last day of the anniversary month. We determine that it is not practicable to complete the preliminary results of this review within the original time limit because we need additional time to obtain and analyze information regarding suspended entries of the subject merchandise during the period of review. Therefore, we are extending the time period for issuing the preliminary results of this review by 45 days until December 3, 2007. This notice is published in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). Dated: October 10, 2007. Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. [FR Doc. E7–20346 Filed 10–15–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–809] Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges From India; Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On July 31, 2007, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the new shipper administrative review in the antidumping duty order covering mmaher on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 04:12 Oct 16, 2007 Jkt 214001 certain forged stainless steel flanges from India. See Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Administrative Review, 72 FR 41706 (July 31, 2007) (Preliminary Results). The merchandise covered by this review is certain forged stainless steel flanges, manufactured by Micro Forge (India) (Micro Forge), as described in the ‘‘Scope of the Order’’ section of this notice. The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2006 through July 31, 2006. We invited parties to comment on our Preliminary Results. We received no comments. Therefore, the final results are unchanged from those presented in the preliminary results. The final weighted–average dumping margin for Micro Forge is listed below in the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ EFFECTIVE DATE: October 16, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney, or Robert James, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4475 or (202) 482– 0649, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 31, 2007, the Department published the preliminary results of the antidumping duty new shipper administrative review of certain forged stainless steel flanges from India. See Preliminary Results. The review covers Micro Forge, and the POR is February 1, 2006, through July 31, 2006. In the Preliminary Results, we assigned Micro Forge a margin based on adverse facts available. We invited parties to comment. We received no comments. Scope of the Order The products covered by this order are certain forged stainless steel flanges, both finished and not finished, generally manufactured to specification ASTM A–182, and made in alloys such as 304, 304L, 316, and 316L. The scope includes five general types of flanges. They are weld–neck, used for butt–weld line connection; threaded, used for threaded line connections; slip–on and lap joint, used with stub–ends/butt– weld line connections; socket weld, used to fit pipe into a machined recession; and blind, used to seal off a line. The sizes of the flanges within the scope range generally from one to six inches; however, all sizes of the above– described merchandise are included in the scope. Specifically excluded from PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the scope of this order are cast stainless steel flanges. Cast stainless steel flanges generally are manufactured to specification ASTM A–351. The flanges subject to this order are currently classifiable under subheadings 7307.21.10.00 and 7307.21.50.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise under review is dispositive of whether or not the merchandise is covered by the scope of the order. Final Results of the Review We determine the following percentage weighted–average margin exists for the period February 1, 2006, through July 31, 2006: Manufacturer / Exporter Weighted Average Margin (percentage) Micro Forge .................. 210.00 Liquidation The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. In this review, the Department is applying an adverse facts available rate of 210.00 percent to Micro Forge’s U.S. sales. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. We will direct CBP to assess the appropriate assessment rate (210 percent) against the entered Customs values for the subject merchandise on each of Micro Forge’s entries under the relevant order during the POR. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Tariff Act): (1) for the company named above, the cash deposit rates will be the rate shown; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company–specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less–than–fair– value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM 16OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58639-58640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-20346]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

A-533-838


Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: Extension of Time Limit 
for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 16, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun or Richard Rimlinger, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
5760 and (202) 482-4477, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    At the request of an interested party, the Department of Commerce 
(the Department) initiated the administrative review of the antidumping 
duty order on carbazole violet pigment 23 from India for the period 
December 1, 2005, through November 30, 2006. See Initiation of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request 
for Revocation in Part, 72 FR 5005 (February 2, 2007). On August 22, 
2007, we extended the due date for the completion of the preliminary 
results of reviews by 45

[[Page 58640]]

days. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: Extension of Time 
Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 72 FR 46954 (August 22, 2007). The preliminary results of the 
review are currently due no later than October 19, 2007.

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), requires the Department to make a preliminary determination 
within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order 
for which a review is requested and a final determination within 120 
days after the date on which the preliminary determination is 
published. If it is not practicable to complete the review within these 
time periods, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to 
extend the time limit for the preliminary determination to a maximum of 
365 days after the last day of the anniversary month.
    We determine that it is not practicable to complete the preliminary 
results of this review within the original time limit because we need 
additional time to obtain and analyze information regarding suspended 
entries of the subject merchandise during the period of review. 
Therefore, we are extending the time period for issuing the preliminary 
results of this review by 45 days until December 3, 2007.
    This notice is published in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).

    Dated: October 10, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-20346 Filed 10-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.