Notice of Extension of the Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People's Republic of China, 58055-58056 [E7-20152]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 197 / Friday, October 12, 2007 / Notices reviewed companies did not know their merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all–others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full discussion of this clarification, see Assessment of Antidumping Duties. Export Price With respect to export–price (EP) sales, we divided the total dumping margins (calculated as the difference between normal value and the EP) for each exporter’s importer or customer by the total number of units the exporter sold to that importer or customer. We will direct CBP to assess the resulting per–unit dollar amount against each unit of merchandise on each of that importer’s or customer’s entries under the relevant order during the review period. Constructed Export Price For constructed export–price (CEP) sales, we divided the total dumping margins for the reviewed sales by the total entered value of those reviewed sales for each importer. We will direct CBP to assess the resulting percentage margin against the entered customs values for the subject merchandise on each of that importer’s entries under the relevant order during the review period. See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Cash–Deposit Requirements To calculate the cash–deposit rate for each respondent (i.e., each exporter and/or manufacturer included in these reviews), we divided the total dumping margins for each company by the total net value of that company’s sales of merchandise during the review period subject to each order. To derive a single deposit rate for each respondent, we weight–averaged the EP and CEP deposit rates (using the EP and CEP, respectively, as the weighting factors). To accomplish this when we sampled CEP sales, we first calculated the total dumping margins for all CEP sales during the review period by multiplying the sample CEP margins by the ratio of total days in the review period to days in the sample weeks. We then calculated a total net value for all CEP sales during the review period by multiplying the sample CEP total net value by the same ratio. Finally, we divided the combined total dumping margins for both EP and CEP sales by the combined total value for both EP and CEP sales to obtain the deposit rate. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:35 Oct 11, 2007 Jkt 214001 We will direct CBP to collect the resulting percentage deposit rate against the entered customs value of each of the exporter’s entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice. Entries of parts incorporated into finished bearings before sales to an unaffiliated customer in the United States will receive the respondent’s deposit rate applicable to the order. Furthermore, the following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of this notice of final results of administrative reviews for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, consistent with section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) the cash–deposit rates for the reviewed companies will be the rates shown above; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash–deposit rate will continue to be the company–specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less–than-fair–value (LTFV) investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash–deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) the cash–deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be the ‘‘All Others’’ rate for the relevant order made effective by the final results of review published on July 26, 1993. See Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof from France, et al: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Revocation in Part of an Antidumping Duty Order, 58 FR 39729 (July 26, 1993). For ball bearings from Italy, see Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof from France, et al; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Partial Termination of Administrative Reviews, 61 FR 66471, 66521 (December 17, 1996). These rates are the ‘‘All Others’’ rates from the relevant LTFV investigation. These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during these review periods. Failure to comply with this requirement could PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 58055 result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification Regarding APOs This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: Ocotober 4, 2007. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Appendix 1. Zeroing of Negative Margins 2. Model–Matching Methodology 3. Constructed Export–Price Offset 4. Inventory Carrying Costs 5. Calculation of Cost of Production and Constructed Value 6. Use of Acquisition Costs 7. Miscellaneous Issues A. Deduction of Japanese–Worker Expenses B. U.S. Duty C. Exclusion of High–Profit Sales D. NTN Bearing Design E. Further–Processing Methodology F. Completeness of Reported U.S. Sales G. 15-day Issuance of Liquidation Instructions [FR Doc. E7–20151 Filed 10–11–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–893] Notice of Extension of the Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People’s Republic of China Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: October 12, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Lai Robinson, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1 58056 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 197 / Friday, October 12, 2007 / Notices Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3797. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 26, 2007, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published a preliminary notice of intent to rescind the antidumping duty new shipper review of certain frozen warm water shrimp from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) with respect to Maoming Changxing Foods Co., Ltd. (‘‘Maoming Changxing’’), covering the period February 1, 2006, through July 31, 2007. See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Notice of Intent to Rescind Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 72 FR 41058 (July 26, 2007). jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Extension of Time Limit of Final Results The final results for this new shipper review are currently due on October 17, 2007. Consistent with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’) and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2), the Department is extending the time limit for the completion of the final results of this new shipper review by 60 days because the case is extraordinarily complicated. This new shipper review involves complicated ownership and affiliation issues which will require the Department to consider arguments by interested parties regarding the actual owners and the source of founding capital with respect to Maoming Changxing. In addition, the Department requires additional time to consider domestic producers’ arguments regarding the antidumping duty rate to apply to Maoming Changxing. Because of the complexity of issues in this case, and in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2), we are extending the time period for issuing the final results of the new shipper review of Maoming Changxing by 60 days. Since a 60-day extension would result in the deadline for the final results falling on December 16, 2007, which is Sunday, the new deadline for the final results will be the next business day, December 17, 2007. See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). This notice is published pursuant to sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i)(1) of VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:35 Oct 11, 2007 Jkt 214001 the Act and section 351.214(i)(2) of the Department’s regulations. Dated: October 4, 2007. Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E7–20152 Filed 10–11–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–549–812] Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Furfuryl Alcohol from Thailand Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On August 2, 2007, the Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on furfuryl alcohol from Thailand. The period of review is July 1, 2005, through May 3, 2006. The final results do not differ from the preliminary results of this review, in which we found that sales of the subject merchandise have not been made below normal value. EFFECTIVE DATE: October 12, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Damian Felton or Brandon Farlander, AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0133 and (202) 482–0182, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On July 25, 1995, the Department published an antidumping duty order on furfuryl alcohol from Thailand. See Furfuryl Alcohol from Thailand: Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination and Order, 60 FR 38035 (July 25, 1995). On August 30, 2006, the Department published a notice of initiation for this administrative review. See Notice of Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 71 FR 51573 (August 30, 2006). On August 2, 2007, the Department published in the Federal Register its preliminary results of the administrative review of this order. See Furfuryl Alcohol from Thailand; Preliminary Results of 2005–2006 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 72 FR 42390 (August 2, 2007) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). In the Preliminary Results, the Department invited interested PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 parties to submit briefs and request a hearing. No briefs were received and the Department did not conduct a hearing because none was requested. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is furfuryl alcohol (C4H3OCH2OH). Furfuryl alcohol is a primary alcohol, and is colorless or pale yellow in appearance. It is used in the manufacture of resins and as a wetting agent and solvent for coating resins, nitrocellulose, cellulose acetate, and other soluble dyes. The product subject to this order is classifiable under subheading 2932.13.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of this proceeding is dispositive. Period of Review The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is July 1, 2005, through May 3, 2006.1 Final Results of Review As noted above, the Department received no comments concerning the Preliminary Results. Consistent with the Preliminary Results, we find that a de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) dumping margin exists for Indorama Chemicals (Thailand) Ltd. during the POR. Because no party submitted comments on the Preliminary Results and the Department has not made any changes to the Preliminary Results, we have not prepared a Decision Memorandum for these final results. For further details of our findings, see the Preliminary Results. Exporter/manufacturer Weighted–average margin percentage Indorama Chemicals (Thailand) Ltd. ........... *This 0.39* is a de minimis rate. Assessment Rates The Department has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. The Department intends 1 On August 30, 2006, the Department published a notice of initiation for this administrative review covering the period July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006. See Notice of Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 71 FR 51573 (August 30, 2006). However, following the initiation, the Department has revoked this order effective May 4, 2006. See Furfuryl Alcohol from Thailand; Final Results of the Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order and Revocation of the Order, 72 FR 9729 (March 5, 2007). Therefore, the revised POR is now July 1, 2005 through May 3, 2006. E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 197 (Friday, October 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58055-58056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-20152]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-893]


Notice of Extension of the Final Results of Antidumping Duty New 
Shipper Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People's 
Republic of China

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 12, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Lai Robinson, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 9, Import

[[Page 58056]]

Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230; 
telephone: (202) 482-3797.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 26, 2007, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') 
published a preliminary notice of intent to rescind the antidumping 
duty new shipper review of certain frozen warm water shrimp from the 
People's Republic of China (``PRC'') with respect to Maoming Changxing 
Foods Co., Ltd. (``Maoming Changxing''), covering the period February 
1, 2006, through July 31, 2007. See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 
from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Notice of Intent to 
Rescind Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 72 FR 41058 (July 26, 
2007).

Extension of Time Limit of Final Results

    The final results for this new shipper review are currently due on 
October 17, 2007. Consistent with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``Act'') and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2), the 
Department is extending the time limit for the completion of the final 
results of this new shipper review by 60 days because the case is 
extraordinarily complicated. This new shipper review involves 
complicated ownership and affiliation issues which will require the 
Department to consider arguments by interested parties regarding the 
actual owners and the source of founding capital with respect to 
Maoming Changxing. In addition, the Department requires additional time 
to consider domestic producers' arguments regarding the antidumping 
duty rate to apply to Maoming Changxing.
    Because of the complexity of issues in this case, and in accordance 
with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2), we 
are extending the time period for issuing the final results of the new 
shipper review of Maoming Changxing by 60 days. Since a 60-day 
extension would result in the deadline for the final results falling on 
December 16, 2007, which is Sunday, the new deadline for the final 
results will be the next business day, December 17, 2007. See Notice of 
Clarification: Application of ``Next Business Day'' Rule for 
Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 
1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
    This notice is published pursuant to sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 
777(i)(1) of the Act and section 351.214(i)(2) of the Department's 
regulations.

    Dated: October 4, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-20152 Filed 10-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S