Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Out Performance Requirements To Support Air Traffic Control (ATC) Service, 56947-56972 [07-4938]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
Honeywell International Inc. (formerly
AlliedSignal Inc. and Garrett Turbine
Engine Co.): Docket No. FAA–2007–
29092; Directorate Identifier 2007–NE–
30–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) action by
December 4, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Honeywell
International Inc. ATF3–6–4C, ATF3–6A–3C,
and ATF3–6A–4C turbofan engines equipped
with part number (P/N) 3002070–1 low
pressure compressor (LPC) aft shaft. These
engines are installed on, but not limited to,
Dassault Aviation Fan Jet Falcon Series G
(Falcon 20G/HU25), and Dassault Aviation
Mystere-Falcon 200 airplanes.
56947
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of eight
LPC aft shafts found cracked during
fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI). We
are issuing this AD to prevent uncoupling
and overspeed of the low pressure turbine,
which could result in uncontained engine
failure and damage to the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified in Table 1
and Table 2 of this AD, unless the actions
have already been done.
TABLE 1.—ATF3–6A–4C TURBOFAN ENGINES, LPC AFT SHAFT REPLACEMENT COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
For ATF3–6A–4C turbofan engines, if the
cycles-since-new (CSN) on the effective
date of this AD are:
Then replace the LPC aft shaft:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Within
Within
Within
Within
6,500 or more CSN ..............................
5,000 to 6,499 CSN .............................
4,000 to 4,999 CSN .............................
Fewer than 4,000 CSN ........................
an
an
an
an
additional
additional
additional
additional
100 cycles-in-service (CIS).
800 CIS, but not more than 6,600 CSN, whichever occurs first.
1,500 CIS, but not more than 5,800 CSN, whichever occurs first.
2,000 CIS, but not more than 5,500 CSN, whichever occurs first.
TABLE 2.—ATF3–6–4C AND ATF3–6A–3C TURBOFAN ENGINES, LPC AFT SHAFT REPLACEMENT COMPLIANCE
SCHEDULE
For ATF3–6–4C and ATF3–6A–3C turbofan engines, if the CSN on the effective
date of this AD are:
Then replace the LPC aft shaft:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Within
Within
Within
Within
4,400 or more CSN ..............................
3,600 to 4,399 CSN .............................
3,300 to 3,599 CSN .............................
Fewer than 3,300 CSN ........................
LPC Aft Shaft Replacement
(f) Using the compliance schedule in Table
1 or Table 2 of this AD as applicable, remove
the LPC aft shaft P/N 3002070–1, from
service, and install a serviceable LPC aft
shaft.
an
an
an
an
additional
additional
additional
additional
100 CIS.
500 CIS, but not more than 4,500 CSN, whichever occurs first.
700 CIS, but not more than 4,100 CSN, whichever occurs first.
1,000 CIS, but not more than 4,000 CSN, whichever occurs first.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
October 1, 2007.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–19684 Filed 10–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Definition
(g) For the purpose of this AD, a
serviceable LPC aft shaft is an aft shaft with
a P/N not referenced in this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 91
Related Information
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
(h) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, has the authority to
approve alternative methods of compliance
for this AD if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Automatic Dependent Surveillance—
Broadcast (ADS–B) Out Performance
Requirements To Support Air Traffic
Control (ATC) Service
(i) Honeywell International Inc. Service
Bulletin No. ATF3–72–6240, Revision 1,
dated May 14, 2007, pertains to the subject
of this AD.
(j) Contact Joseph Costa, Aerospace
Engineer, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA
90712–4137; e-mail: joseph.costa@faa.gov;
telephone: (562) 627–5246; fax: (562) 627–
5210.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
[Docket No. FAA–2007–29305; Notice No.
07–15]
RIN 2120–AI92
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice proposes
performance requirements for certain
avionics equipment on aircraft operating
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in specified classes of airspace within
the United States National Airspace
System. The proposed rule would
facilitate the use of Automatic
Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast
(ADS–B) for aircraft surveillance by
Federal Aviation Administration and
Department of Defense air traffic
controllers to accommodate the
expected increase in demand for air
transportation. In addition to
accommodating the anticipated increase
in operations, this proposal, if adopted,
would provide aircraft operators with a
platform for additional flight
applications and services.
DATES: Send your comments on or
before January 3, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments
identified by Docket Number FAA–
2007–29305 using any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to the Docket
Management Facility; U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
56948
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed after the comment period has
closed if it is possible to do so without
incurring expense or delay. We may
change this proposal in light of the
comments we receive.
If you want the FAA to acknowledge
receipt of your comments on this
proposal, include with your comments
a pre-addressed, stamped postcard on
which the docket number appears. We
will stamp the date on the postcard and
mail it to you.
Do not file in the docket information
that you consider to be proprietary or
confidential business information. Send
or deliver this information directly to
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document. You must mark the
information that you consider
proprietary or confidential. If you send
the information on a disk or CD–ROM,
mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM
and also identify electronically within
the disk or CD–ROM the specific
information that is proprietary or
confidential.
Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), when we are
aware of proprietary information filed
with a comment, we do not place it in
the docket. We hold it in a separate file
to which the public does not have
access, and place a note in the docket
that we have received it. If we receive
a request to examine or copy this
information, we treat it as any other
request under the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). We
process such a request under the DOT
procedures found in 49 CFR part 7.
Comments Invited
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Bring
comments to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 of the West
Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to the Docket
Management Facility at 202–493–2251.
Privacy Act: We will post all
comments we receive, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information you provide.
Anyone is able to search the electronic
form of all comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477–78) or you may visit
https://DocketInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: To read background
documents or comments received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov at any time
and follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket. Or, go to the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 of the West Building Ground
Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vincent Capezzuto, Surveillance and
Broadcast Services Office, Air Traffic
Organization, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone 202–385–8288.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Rulemaking Documents
The FAA invites interested persons to
participate in this rulemaking proposal
by submitting written comments, data,
or views. We also invite comments
relating to the economic, environmental,
energy, or federalism impacts that might
result from adopting the proposals in
this document. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, include specific
rule language changes, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send
us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive
You can get an electronic copy of
rulemaking documents using the
Internet by—
1. Searching the Federal eRulemaking
Portal (https://www.regulations.gov);
2. Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and
Policies Web page at https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/; or
3. Accessing the Government Printing
Office’s Web page at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
You can also get a copy by sending a
request to the Federal Aviation
Administration, Office of Rulemaking,
ARM–1, 800 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by
calling (202) 267–9680. Make sure to
identify the docket number, notice
number, or amendment number of this
rulemaking.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
Proprietary or Confidential Business
Information
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103, Sovereignty and use of airspace,
and Subpart III, section 44701, General
requirements. Under section 40103, the
FAA is charged with prescribing
regulations on the flight of aircraft,
including regulations on safe altitudes,
navigating, protecting, and identifying
aircraft, and the safe and efficient use of
the navigable airspace. Under section
44701, the FAA is charged with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce.
This proposal is within the scope of
sections 40103 and 44701 since it
proposes aircraft performance
requirements that would meet advanced
surveillance needs to accommodate the
projected increase in operations within
the National Airspace System (NAS). As
more aircraft operate within the U.S.
airspace, improved surveillance
performance is necessary to continue to
balance the growth in air transportation
with the agency’s mandate for a safe and
efficient air transportation system.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Vision of the Future
B. The Century of Aviation Reauthorization
Act and NextGen
C. Today’s Radar Environment
II. The ADS–B System
A. General
B. Ground Infrastructure
III. Summary of the Proposal
IV. The Proposal for ADS–B Out
A. Advantages of ADS–B Out
B. Avionics
1. 1090ES and UAT Broadcast Links
2. Broadcast Link Requirements for
Different Flight Levels
3. Part 91 Appendix H Message Elements
4. Navigation Position Sensor and the
Accuracy and Integrity of the ADS–B
Message
5. ADS–B Antenna Diversity and Transmit
Power Requirements
6. Latency of the ADS–B Out Broadcast
Message Elements
7. Maintenance
C. Operational Procedures
1. Applicability
2. Airspace
3. Pilot Procedures
4. Backup Surveillance Strategy
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
5. Compliance Schedule for ADS–B Out
Requirements
V. ADS–B In
A. Avionics
B. Applications and Services
VI. FAA Experience with ADS–B
A. Capstone
B. Gulf of Mexico
C. UPS—Louisville
D. Surveillance in Non-Radar Airspace
VII. ADS–B in Other Countries
VIII. Alternatives to ADS–B
IX. Rulemaking Notices and Analyses
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
I. Background
A. Vision of the Future
The demand for air travel is growing
in the U.S. and around the world. The
FAA’s forecasts project a doubling in
U.S. airline passenger traffic by 2025.
The forecasts also show strong growth
for general aviation, especially with the
advent of very light jets. By the end of
this decade as many as 400–500 of these
small jets could join the fleet each year.
With the new small jets and other
growth, the active general aviation fleet
is projected to grow from 230,000
aircraft today to 275,000 aircraft in
2020.
That is the demand from piloted
aircraft. The development and use of
unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) is one
of the next big steps forward in
aviation’s evolution. The FAA is
working across government and
industry to ensure the safe authorization
of these aircraft to fly in civil airspace.
The good news is U.S. air travel and
related use of the National Airspace
System (NAS) will grow. That growth
will bring challenges since the present
U.S. air traffic system—the world’s
largest and safest—is not designed to
absorb this level of growth. Today’s
system is limited by outmoded
technology—such as the constraints
ground-based radar places on the
distance aircraft must be separated and
the limits caused by having to transmit
information by voice between aircraft
and the ground.
The solution to managing the
anticipated growth in the use of the
NAS is the Next Generation Air
Transportation System, or NextGen,
which will assure the safe and efficient
movement of people and goods as
demand increases. NextGen will use
technology to allow precise navigation,
permit accurate real-time
communication, and vastly improve
situational awareness. The goal: A
system flexible enough to accommodate
safely whatever number, type and mix
of aircraft there will be in U.S. skies by
2025.
NextGen will be an aircraft-centric
system with performance-based
requirements. The future system will
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
describe performance for navigation,
communications, and surveillance.
For navigation, the aviation
community is already seeing the
benefits of performance-based
navigation with the use of Required
Navigation Performance (RNP) as well
as Area Navigation (RNAV) procedures
at many U.S. airports. RNP and RNAV
are examples of procedures that use
improved navigational accuracy as
compared to traditional procedures. The
new procedures are being implemented
consistent with the ‘‘Roadmap for
Performance-Based Navigation.’’ The
benefit of performance-based
navigation: Enabling aircraft to fly
precisely defined flight paths with
unprecedented accuracy.
For communication, NextGen will be
built on a more comprehensive and
capable information network than has
been previously available. It will ensure
the right information gets to the right
person at the right time. With
performance-based navigation and
internet-like access to critical
information—including nearly real-time
weather—pilots will be able to make
precision landings at airports that have
no control towers, radar, or Instrument
Landing Systems. Attaining the goal of
performance-based communications
will depend on technology, such as
datalink, which would transmit key
instructions directly to aircraft flight
management systems, which would
speed receipt of critical information and
prevent errors that can come from
manual data entry.
The third element—performancebased surveillance—relies on
technology that permits knowing the
exact location of other aircraft in the air
and of other aircraft and ground
vehicles on the airport surface. The
aviation community’s experience with
ADS–B, which periodically broadcasts
an aircraft’s location—both horizontal
and vertical position and horizontal and
vertical velocity—will lead directly to
the performance requirements. When
displayed in the cockpit, information
obtained through ADS–B greatly
improves situational awareness in the
en route segment, in the terminal area
during approaches, and on the airport
surface. For additional information on
ADS–B activities, see Section VI, FAA
Experience with ADS–B later in the
preamble.
This rulemaking is important because
ADS–B is an essential NextGen building
block. Improving surveillance requires
advanced onboard equipment with
backup capability. Most, if not all, of the
surveillance capability as well as the
navigation and communications
capabilities should be onboard the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56949
aircraft so the required capabilities will
go wherever the aircraft goes. As part of
the rulemaking effort, the FAA
established an Aviation Rulemaking
Committee under Order 1110.147. This
committee has been chartered to deliver
a report on how to optimize operational
benefits of the ADS–B system and to
provide recommendations to the FAA
on the rulemaking after the NPRM is
published. The scope of the ARC
membership is designed to provide the
widest range of inputs into the
development of the NextGen strategy.
The FAA will put the ARC
recommendations in the docket
established for this rulemaking.
It is this combination of onboard
capability and performance expectations
that will enable aircraft in the future to
fly safely and efficiently despite everincreasing demands on the airspace.
B. The Century of Aviation
Reauthorization Act and NextGen
The ‘‘Century of Aviation
Reauthorization Act’’ was enacted on
December 12, 2003 (Pub. L. 108–176)
(the ‘‘Act’’). This law set forth
requirements and objectives for
transforming the U.S. air transportation
system to meet the needs of the 21st
Century. Section 709 of the Act required
the Secretary of Transportation to
establish in the FAA a joint planning
and development office (JPDO) to
manage work related to NextGen.
Among its statutorily defined
responsibilities, the JPDO coordinates
the development and utilization of new
technologies to ensure that when
available, they may be used to the
fullest potential in aircraft and in the air
traffic control system.
The FAA, the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration (NASA) and
the Departments of Commerce, Defense,
and Homeland Security have launched
an effort to align their resources to
develop and further evolve NextGen.
The goals of NextGen, as stated in the
Act, that are addressed by this proposal
are:
(1) Improve the level of safety,
security, efficiency, quality, and
affordability of the NAS and aviation
services;
(2) Take advantage of data from
emerging ground-based and space-based
communications, navigation, and
surveillance technologies;
(3) Be scalable to accommodate and
encourage substantial growth in
domestic and international
transportation and anticipate and
accommodate continuing technology
upgrades and advances; and
(4) Accommodate a wide range of
aircraft operations, including airlines,
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
56950
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
air taxis, helicopters, general aviation,
and UAS.
The JPDO was also charged with
creating and carrying out an integrated
plan for NextGen. The Act mandates
that the NextGen Integrated Plan (the
‘‘Plan’’) be designed to ensure that the
NextGen system meets the air
transportation safety, security, mobility,
efficiency, and capacity needs beyond
those currently included in the FAA’s
Operational Evolution Plan.1 As
described in the Plan 2, the current
approach to air transportation, where
ground based radars track flights along
congested airways, and pass information
among the control centers for the
duration of the flights, is becoming
operationally obsolete. The current
system is increasingly inefficient, and
large increases in air traffic will result
in mounting delays or limitations in
service for many areas in the NAS.
As detailed in the Plan, the demand
for air travel is expected to double
within the next 20 years. Current FAA
projections are that by 2025, operations
will grow to more than half a million
departures and arrivals per year at
approximately 16 additional airports.
The present air traffic control system
will be unable to handle this level of
growth. Not only will the current
method of handling traffic flow not be
able to adapt to the highest volume and
density for future operations, but the
nature of the new growth may be
problematic, as future aviation activity
will be much more diverse than it is
today. A shift of 2 percent of today’s
commercial passengers to very light jets
that seat 4–6 passengers would result in
triple the number of flights necessary to
carry the same number of passengers.3
Furthermore, the challenges grow with
the advent of other non-conventional
aircraft, such as the UAS.
The future of air transportation
contemplated in the Plan is complex,
and the FAA believes that ADS–B
technology is a key component in
achieving many of the goals set forth in
the Plan. This proposed rule embraces
a new approach to surveillance
performance requirements that can lead
to greater and more efficient use of
airspace. The Plan articulates several
large transformation strategies to create
the NextGen System. This proposal is a
major step toward strategically
1 The Plan was submitted to Congress on
December 12, 2004.
2 A copy of the Plan has been placed in the docket
for this rulemaking.
3 Very light jets may revolutionize the industry by
permitting more individuals and corporations to
own aircraft. It addition, many airports that are too
small for large jet operations should benefit because
they can support very light jets.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
‘‘establishing an agile air traffic system
that accommodates future requirements
and readily responds to shifts in
demand from all users.’’ ADS–B
technology will assist in the transition
to a system with less dependence on
ground infrastructure and facilities, and
would provide for more efficient use of
airspace.
C. Today’s Radar Environment
In the U.S., Air Traffic Control (ATC)
surveillance and aircraft separation
services are provided by the use of
primary and secondary surveillance
radar systems. While radar technology
has advanced, it is essentially a product
of 1940s World War II technology. Both
primary and secondary radars are very
large structures that are expensive to
deploy and maintain; they also require
the agency to lease land for site
installation.
Primary radar is a passive detection
method that requires no special
equipment aboard the aircraft. It is a
technology that transmits a beam that is
reflected by a target. This reflection
forms a return signal that is translated
into an aircraft position by ATC
automation systems. Primary radar,
however, is not always able to
distinguish aircraft from other objects
that reflect radar beams, such as birds or
severe weather, which can result in
‘‘clutter’’ on the ATC radar scope. In
addition, with primary radar, ATC is
provided only with an aircraft’s position
relative to time. It does not provide any
other information about the aircraft.
Primary radar measures both the
range and bearing of a particular
aircraft. Bearing is measured by the
position of the rotating radar antenna
when it receives a response to its signal
that is reflected from the aircraft. Range
is measured by the time it takes for the
radar to receive the reflected response.
Detecting changes in an aircraft’s
velocity requires several radar sweeps
that are spaced several seconds apart.
Because the antenna beam becomes
wider as the aircraft travels farther away
from the radar, the accuracy of the radar
is a function of range, and the accuracy
decreases as the distance between the
aircraft and the radar site increases.
Consequently, aircraft on the outer
fringes of radar coverage or in non-radar
areas are separated by greater distances,
directly affecting efficiency and
ultimately capacity in the NAS.
A Secondary Surveillance Radar
(SSR) system consists of antennas,
transmitters, and processors installed in
ATC facilities, and radio transponder
devices that are installed in aircraft.
This system enhances primary radar by
improving the ability to detect and
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
identify aircraft. An SSR transmits
interrogation pulses that elicit responses
from transponders on board the aircraft.
A transponder installed on the aircraft
‘‘listens’’ for the interrogation signal and
sends back a reply that provides aircraft
information. The aircraft is then
displayed as a tagged icon on the air
traffic controller’s radar screen.4
Each transponder category has unique
characteristics, operating functions, and
requirements. A transponder with Mode
A functionality requires the pilot to
input a discrete code. If the same
transponder is connected with an
encoding device then it will also report
the aircraft’s altitude (Mode C). Most
aircraft operated in general aviation
have Mode A/C transponders. Any
aircraft required to have Traffic Alert
and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)
II, or that voluntarily has TCAS II
installed must also be equipped with a
Mode S Transponder. (This generally
includes aircraft operated under parts
121, 125, 129 and some aircraft operated
under part 135.) Mode S transponders
transmit both aircraft altitude and
aircraft identification information. Both
Mode A/C transponders and Mode S
transponders require interrogation to
provide information.
To accommodate the projected level
of traffic without increasing delay, more
comprehensive surveillance in the NAS,
including more radar sites in certain
areas, would be necessary. Even if more
radar sites were commissioned,
however, there are many areas in which
radar coverage is not feasible, either
geographically (e.g., mountainous areas)
or in a cost-effective manner (e.g.,
remote areas). Furthermore, simply
increasing the number of radars in the
NAS does not solve the inherent
limitation of radar technology, and
would not allow the FAA to reduce
current separation standards.5
Consequently, the future of air traffic
surveillance cannot be based solely on
the use of radar. Radar technology also
lacks the capability to provide services
on the flight deck. However, the FAA is
planning to maintain its current
network of primary radars, and expects
to be able to reduce a percentage of its
secondary radars. This NPRM does not
propose to reduce primary radar sites.6
4 An aircraft without an operating transponder
may still be observed by ATC using primary radar,
but the aircraft will not have an identifying tag.
5 The FAA currently separates aircraft by 5 NM
in the en route environment and 3 NM in the
terminal environment.
6 While the FAA expects to be able to reduce a
significant percentage of the national secondary
surveillance radar infrastructure, primary radars
will not be decommissioned as a function of this
proposal. Primary radar will serve a role in
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Instead, this NPRM would transfer
future aircraft surveillance to newer and
more advanced onboard avionics that
provide more accurate and timely
aircraft information. ADS–B has been
identified as the technology to facilitate
that goal.
II. The ADS–B System
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
A. General
The ADS–B system is an advanced
surveillance technology that combines a
satellite positioning service, aircraft
avionics, and ground infrastructure to
enable more accurate transmission of
information between aircraft and ATC.
The system enables equipped aircraft to
continually broadcast information, such
as identification, current position,
altitude, and velocity. ADS–B uses
information from a position service, e.g.
Global Positioning System (GPS), to
broadcast the aircraft’s location, thereby
making this information more timely
and accurate than the information
provided by the conventional radar
system (which has a latency factor since
it is based on interrogation and reply).
ADS–B also can provide the platform for
aircraft to receive various types of
information, including ADS–B
transmissions from other equipped
aircraft or vehicles. ADS–B is automatic
because no external interrogation is
required, but is ‘‘dependent’’ because it
relies on onboard position sources and
onboard broadcast transmission systems
to provide surveillance information to
ATC and ultimately to other users.
Implementation of an ADS–B system
would not completely replace the
primary radar or SSR at this time. In
addition, ADS–B does not replace the
requirement for transponders.
Transponders are still necessary for
SSR, which is the FAA’s backup
strategy in case of ADS–B failure. For
more information on the backup
strategy, see section IV.C.4, Backup
Surveillance Strategy.
The performance requirements for
ADS–B avionics proposed in this NPRM
would ensure that the aircraft is
broadcasting the requisite information
with the degree of accuracy and
integrity necessary for ATC to use that
information for surveillance.7 This
enhanced surveillance would provide
ATC with the enhanced ability to
surveillance during the transition period of ADS–
B avionics equipage.
7 An aircraft equipped for ADS–B Out would
transmit the aircraft’s position, velocity and other
specified, proposed message elements once per
second. Radar data, on the other hand, is generated
approximately once every 3–12 seconds for display
to the air traffic controller depending on whether
the aircraft is in the en route or terminal
environment.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
surveil and separate aircraft so that
efficiency and capacity could increase
beyond current levels to meet the
predicted demand for ATC services
while continually maintaining safety.
Incremental developments in capacity,
efficiency, and air traffic control
procedures based on radar technology
cannot accommodate the anticipated
increase in demand for surveillance and
separation services, which could result
in delays that would far exceed those
experienced today. Without ADS–B, the
increase in demand could result in
increased congestion and the denial of
ATC service to some users of the NAS.
ADS–B technology already has been
demonstrated successfully in Alaska via
the Capstone program.8 In Alaska, radar
coverage is either very limited or nonexistent. ADS–B provides a level of
surveillance performance that
previously did not exist and has
resulted in increases in both efficiency
and capacity.
‘‘ADS–B Out’’ refers to an
appropriately equipped aircraft’s
broadcasting of various aircraft
information. ‘‘ADS–B In’’ refers to an
appropriately equipped aircraft’s ability
to receive another aircraft’s ADS–B Out
information. This proposal only seeks to
require ADS–B Out; the FAA is not
proposing to require ADS–B In at this
time.9
B. Ground Infrastructure
Implementing ADS–B in the NAS to
provide surveillance requires avionics,
ground infrastructure, automation, and
data. This NPRM addresses the
performance requirements for the
avionics and the necessary data that
must be broadcast from the aircraft in
order for ATC to use that information
for surveillance and separation. The
ground infrastructure involves the
installation of a multitude of ground
stations throughout the NAS that first
receive the ADS–B Out transmissions
from an aircraft, then relay real-time
information based on those
transmissions to ATC facilities. The
exact number of ground stations needed
to provide broadcast services across the
NAS will be negotiated as part of the
national broadcast service contract. The
8 For additional information on Capstone, see
Section VI. later in the preamble. It should be noted
that Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 97,
Special Operating Rules for the Conduct of
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) Area Navigation
(RNAV) Operations Using Global Positioning
Systems (GPS) in Alaska (68 FR 14072; March 21,
2003), would remain in effect to supplement the
requirements in this proposal as it applies to
Alaska.
9 See Sections IV. later in the preamble for a
detailed discussion of ADS–B Out and V. for a
detailed discussion of ADS–B In.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56951
preliminary estimate approved by the
FAA’s Joint Resource Council call for
548 ground stations to provide coverage
NAS-wide and in the Gulf of Mexico.
On August 30, 2007, the FAA
awarded a performance-based service
contract to a consortium led by ITT
Corporation. The contract is to provide
ADS–B surveillance uplink (ground-toair) and downlink (air-to-ground)
services and Automatic Dependent
Surveillance Rebroadcast (ADS–R),
Traffic Information Services—Broadcast
(TIS–B) 10, and Flight Information
Services—Broadcast (FIS–B) 11 services.
The vendor will install and maintain the
ground equipment necessary to provide
ADS–B uplink and downlink services to
ATC. On November, 30, 2006, the FAA
issued a Screening Information Request
to determine which vendors understand
the contract requirements well enough
to proceed in the acquisition process.
The FAA’s schedule for ADS–B Out
calls for all ground infrastructure,
including the provision of broadcast
services, to be in place and available
where current surveillance exists by the
end of fiscal year 2013. This schedule
will provide reasonably ample time for
operators to equip their aircraft for
ADS–B Out and meet the proposed
compliance date of 2020 in this notice.
III. Summary of the Proposal
The FAA is proposing ADS–B Out
performance requirements for all aircraft
operations in Class A, B, and C airspace
areas in the NAS, and Class E airspace
areas at or above 10,000 feet mean sea
level (MSL) over the 48 contiguous
United States and the District of
Columbia. This proposal also would
require that aircraft meet these
performance requirements in the
airspace out to 30 nautical miles (NM),
from the surface up to 10,000 MSL,
around certain identified airports that
are among the nation’s busiest. In
addition, this proposal if adopted would
require that aircraft meet ADS–B Out
performance requirements to operate in
10 Traffic Information Services—Broadcast (TIS–
B) is a ground-based uplink report to a pilot of
proximate traffic that is under surveillance by ATC
but is not ADS–B-equipped. This service would be
available even with limited ADS–B
implementation. The combinations of the
surveillance and TIS–B services can enable pilots
to have enhanced visual acquisition of other
aircraft. Having traffic and other flight obstacles on
a cockpit display will enable pilots to more quickly
identify safety hazards and communicate with ATC
if necessary. Aircraft that are equipped with ADS–
B can be monitored through a direct reception of
their ADS–B signals in an air-to-air environment.
11 Flight Information Services—Broadcast (FIS–B)
is a ground-based uplink of flight information
services and weather data. Other flight information
provided by the FIS–B service includes Notices to
Airmen and Temporary Flight Restrictions.
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
56952
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Class E airspace over the Gulf of Mexico
from the coastline of the United States
out to 12 nautical miles (NM), at and
above 3,000 feet MSL.
The FAA proposes to require aircraft
flying at or above Flight Level 240
(FL240) to have ADS–B Out
performance capabilities using the 1090
Extended Squitter (1090ES) broadcast
link. Aircraft flying in the designated
airspace below FL 240 would have to
use either the 1090ES or Universal
Access Transceiver (UAT) broadcast
link. These proposals would affect all
U.S. commercial air carrier operations,
foreign-flag carriers operating in the
designated classes of U.S. airspace, air
charter operations, air cargo operations,
and a significant portion of the general
aviation fleet operating in the NAS.
The implementation of ADS–B
requires two datalinks to support the
full set of applications. UAT is intended
to support applications for the general
aviation user community that are not
needed by air carriers because air
carriers have weather radar, fly at high
altitudes, and have other aeronautical
links. UAT-equipped general aviation
aircraft are not generally equipped with
weather radar and would be flying at
low altitudes. The 1090ES link is the
internationally agreed upon link for
ADS–B, and is intended to support
applications for air carriers and other
high-performance aircraft. The 1090ES
broadcast link does not support
applications available from FIS–B, like
weather and related flight information.
This is because of the bandwidth
limitations of the 1090ES link for
transmitting the large message
structures required by FIS–B. Weather
and flight information for 1090ESequipped aircraft is generally provided
by commercial products.
As described in the Plan, large
increases in air traffic would result in
mounting delays or limitations in
service for many areas if the current
surveillance system is not modified. An
environment in which aircraft meet the
proposed ADS–B Out performance
requirements would result in greater
capacity and efficiency in the NAS,
maintain safety, and provide a flexible,
expandable platform to accommodate
future traffic growth while avoiding
possible system delays and limitations
in service.
In moving forward with a
performance-based surveillance system,
the FAA believes that communication
with the affected industry is critical.
The FAA hosted several Industry Days
to brief the technology, the rulemaking
and procurement processes and
associated milestones to interested
parties, including manufacturers and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
affected operators. As with any
rulemaking, the FAA invites comments
on the various elements of this proposal,
and all comments will be carefully
considered. If this proposal is adopted
as a final rule, it may be modified in
view of the submitted comments.
IV. The Proposal for ADS–B Out
A. Advantages of ADS–B Out
ADS–B Out, as proposed in this
notice, would enhance surveillance and
broadcast services in both the en route
and terminal environments and provide
ATC with more accurate information to
safely separate aircraft in the air.
In today’s radar surveillance
environment, accuracy and integrity of
radar information is a function of range
and decreases as the distance between
the radar antenna and the aircraft
increases. Unlike radar, both the
accuracy and integrity of ADS–B Out is
uniform and consistent throughout the
service area. A comprehensive, national
surveillance system that utilizes ADS–B
Out would provide ATC with the ability
to accurately identify and locate aircraft
that are either far away from the ATC
facilities or at the outer boundaries of
ground station service volume.
If ATC had more precise aircraft
position information, it could position,
separate, and provide speed and
direction instructions to aircraft with
improved precision and timing. This
would result in the use of optimal flight
paths and altitudes. This transmission
of information would enable
improvement of airspace capacity
throughout the NAS. Additionally, with
ADS–B Out, ATC would receive
updated information broadcast by
aircraft more frequently than with radar,
and would be able to track a more
closely monitored flight path. This
would result in ATC providing fewer
instructions to pilots, thus having more
time to accommodate additional aircraft
within the allotted airspace. These
improved efficiencies for ATC
ultimately should accommodate the
increased number of aircraft able to
operate in the NAS. In addition, we
expect a reduction in aircraft fuel burn
because better surveillance provides for
more efficient use of the airspace,
provides for optimal aircraft routing,
and addresses the limits currently
experienced with radar.
In the terminal radar environment
today, ATC may have to request pilots
to provide aircraft speed, heading, and
in some cases, aircraft identification.
Neither the primary radar nor SSR
systems provide all that information.
With ADS–B, ATC is automatically
provided aircraft speed, heading, and
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
other identifying information, including
aircraft size, which are necessary to
safely position and separate aircraft
more rapidly than is possible today.
While more precise ADS–B derived
aircraft position information improves
ATC efficiencies under current
separation standards, the potential for
significantly greater capacity and
efficiency gains may be realized by
reducing separation standards between
aircraft. Therefore, this rulemaking is
expected to help achieve a level of
surveillance accuracy that would
support reducing aircraft separation
standards. ADS–B is an essential
component of the NextGen platform and
is necessary to achieve a level of
capacity in the NAS commensurate with
future growth.
B. Avionics
This discussion first addresses the
broadcast message links necessary to
transmit aircraft information to the
ground stations and the specific
message elements that would be
broadcast by the aircraft comprising the
ADS–B Out transmission. Next we
discuss the navigation position sensor
and the necessary accuracy and integrity
of the ADS–B message. Finally, we
explain the necessary requirements for
antenna diversity on the aircraft, and
the required latency of the data in the
ADS–B transmission from the aircraft.
1. 1090ES and UAT Broadcast Links
In 2002, the United States determined
that two frequencies would be
appropriate for ADS–B: 1090MHz and
978MHz. To broadcast the necessary
data elements for ADS–B Out
transmission under this proposal,
aircraft would have to be equipped with
either 1090ES or UAT that meet the
latest version of either Technical
Standard Order (TSO)–C166a or TSO–
C154b, respectively.12 Today, operators
of air carriers and many private/
commercial aircraft already are
primarily equipped with avionics
designed under TSO–C112, Air Traffic
Control Radar Beacon System/Mode
Select (ATCRBS/Mode S), which are
required to function with the Traffic
Alert and Collision Avoidance System
12 A TSO is a minimum performance standard
issued by the Administrator for specified materials,
parts, processes, and appliances used on civil
aircraft. TSO–C166a sets the minimum performance
standards for Extended Squitter Automatic
Dependent Surveillance—Broadcast (ADS–B) and
Traffic Information Service Broadcast (TIS–B)
Equipment Operating on the Radio Frequency of
1090 MHz. TSO–C154b sets the minimum
performance standard for Universal Access
Transceiver (UAT) Automatic Dependent
Surveillance— Broadcast (ADS–B) Equipment.
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
(TCAS II) or ACAS.13 Many TSO–C112
Mode S Transponders can be modified
or are designed to provide 1090ES
functionality under TSO–C166a. Most
other general aviation aircraft, typically
small aircraft operated in noncommercial service (that are not
required to have TCAS II), would likely
use the UAT broadcast link for ADS–B
Out, which operates on the 978MHz
frequency. Today, a small number of
aircraft are equipped with UAT ADS–B
In and are capable of receiving TIS–B
and FIS–B services. While the 1090ES
link does not support FIS–B, it does
support TIS–B.
In December 2006, RTCA 14 published
RTCA/DO–260A, Change 2, ‘‘Minimum
Operational Performance Standards
(MOPS) for 1090 MHz Automatic
Dependent Surveillance—Broadcast
(ADS–B).’’ This change revised RTCA/
DO–260 1090ES MOPS. The major
differences between RTCA/DO–260 and
RTCA/ DO–260A are refinements of the
Navigation Integrity Category (NIC),
Navigation Accuracy Category (NAC),
and Surveillance Integrity Level (SIL)
parameters, which significantly improve
the overall performance and
interoperability of the ADS–B Out
broadcast link. These modified
parameters (NIC, NAC, and SIL) provide
a level of accuracy and integrity with
respect to the information transmitted in
the ADS–B Out message that would
enable ATC to provide improved
surveillance and separation services
based on the information it receives
from the aircraft.
After RTCA issued its updates in
December 2006, the FAA subsequently
issued TSO–C166a, which adopted the
recent modifications specified in change
2 to RTCA/DO–260A, and characterizes
the parameters of NIC, NAC, and SIL.15
There are some aircraft equipped today
with legacy 1090ES ADS–B systems.
Operators of these aircraft would need
to modify their broadcast link
equipment to meet the proposed
requirements defined in TSO–C166a.
This modification could include
hardware, software, or both depending
13 Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS)
is comparable to TCAS II and is specified for use
in Europe.
14 RTCA, Incorporated is a not-for-profit
corporation formed to advance the art and science
of aviation and aviation electronic systems for the
benefit of the public. The organization functions as
a Federal Advisory Committee and develops
consensus-based recommendations on
contemporary aviation issues. The organization’s
recommendations are often used as the basis for
government and private sector decisions as well as
the foundation for many TSOs.
15 TSO–C166a superseded TSO–C166.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
upon other avionics installed on the
aircraft.
The transition to TSO–C166a and
TSO–C154b has been identified as a
requirement for use of ADS–B in the
required airspace. The United States
faces unique challenges in air traffic
control due to its high density airspace
and stringent safety requirements. In
order to maintain safety and capacity,
given a state of increased air traffic,
advanced surveillance technologies will
be necessary. The earlier standards in
RTCA/DO–260 do not provide the
performance standards necessary to
meet the requirements of the NAS.
RTCA/DO–260a provides a means to
transmit the Secondary Surveillance
Radar beacon codes that currently
service the NAS and will continue to be
required as a backup to ADS–B. RTCA/
DO–260 does not provide that
compatibility.
The International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) is in the process of
updating the 1090ES Standards and
Recommended Practices (SARPs)
published in ICAO Annex 10,
Amendment 77, to include those
requirements identified in the
publication of RTCA/DO–260A, Change
2. These updated SARPs are expected to
become effective in November 2007.
Operators may, under this proposal,
also choose to equip with dual link
avionics, i.e. 1090ES and UAT, which
would provide the capability to transmit
and receive information on both
broadcast links at the same time.
If an aircraft is to operate at or above
FL240, which is discussed further in
section IV.b.3. of this preamble
(‘‘Broadcast Link Requirements for
Different Flight Levels’’), the aircraft’s
broadcast link capabilities would have
to meet the minimum performance
requirements of TSO–C166a, (i.e., be
equipped with 1090ES). Consequently,
those aircraft operating at or above
FL240 with Mode A/C transponders
would need new transponders. Aircraft
with Mode S transponders without
compatible extended squitter capability
installed would need to be reequipped
with those providing 1090ES
functionality, or supplement them with
1090ES to operate at or above FL240.
In December 2006, RTCA also issued
RTCA/DO–282A, Change 1 for UAT,
which clarified the definitions of the
NIC, NAC, and SIL similar to those
specified for 1090ES discussed above.
TSO–C154b adopted the requirements
of RTCA/DO–282A and clarifies
performance parameters capable of
ensuring interoperability with ground
stations deployed to support the
Capstone program in Alaska, and to
provide for future NAS interoperability
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56953
assurances. Aircraft equipped with UAT
must meet the minimum performance
standards in TSO–C154b, or later
version. There are very few aircraft
equipped with legacy UAT equipment.
Operators of those aircraft would need
to modify their equipment to meet the
performance standards of TSO–C154b.
2. Broadcast Link Requirements for
Different Flight Levels
The FAA proposes to require that
aircraft flying at or above FL240 have
ADS–B Out performance capability
using the 1090ES broadcast link. For
operations below FL240, operators
could equip their aircraft with either the
1090ES or UAT broadcast links. Some
general aviation aircraft are already
equipped with the UAT broadcast link,
and most general aviation operators are
expected to equip with UAT under this
proposal in order to have TIS–B and
FIS–B services. Larger aircraft,
particularly the transport category
aircraft, generally operate at higher
altitudes and are already equipped with
1090ES that meets TSO–C166 (which
would require modification to upgrade
to TSO–C166a under this proposal) or
have equipment installed that uses the
1090 broadcast link. Furthermore, the
international aviation communities, and
for the most part, foreign-flag aircraft
operating in the U.S., tend to operate
large transport category aircraft that also
operate at the higher altitudes. Having a
single broadcast link at higher altitudes
would enable aircraft equipped for
ADS–B In to benefit from potential
future applications such as aircraft
merging and spacing, and selfseparation. These applications are
enabled by having aircraft identify each
other on the same data link without the
need to employ ADS–R, which would
increase the latency of the transmission.
The FAA believes that the approach
articulated in the proposal to require
1090ES for operations at and above
FL240 is largely consistent with how
those affected operators would choose
their respective broadcast link. While
this NPRM does not require equipage for
ADS–B In, we fully recognize that
operators may choose to equip for that
capability and that it is reasonable to lay
the foundation so that operators may be
able to take advantage of future
applications if they so choose.
3. Part 91 Appendix H—Broadcast
Message Elements
The FAA is proposing to add an
appendix to 14 CFR part 91 to specify
the broadcast message elements
necessary for ADS–B Out. These
message elements contain the data
necessary for ATC to support aircraft
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
56954
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
surveillance by ADS–B. The message
elements required support future
NextGen air-to-air applications such as
reduced horizontal separation and self
separation. These message elements also
support the capability for aircraft
avionics to be verified during normal
operations for continuing airworthiness
in lieu of conducting ground checks of
the avionics. We believe the message
elements allow for further NextGen
capabilities, at least to the extent we can
predict those future needs at this time.
However, in the future, additional
elements such as predictive aircraft
movement could be added to enable
further capabilities.
These elements would be broadcast
automatically from the aircraft except
where pilot entry is necessary. Pilot
entry would be necessary for elements
(g) through (k). The following is a
description of each message element.
(a) The length and width of the
aircraft. This message element would
provide ATC with quick reference to the
aircraft’s dimensions. On airport
surfaces in particular, aircraft are in
close proximity to each other and this
information would facilitate ATC’s
ability to use the most appropriate
landing and surface movement
procedures for individual aircraft in
managing traffic on the airport surfaces.
This information would be pre-set when
avionics equipment meeting the
standards in TSO–C166a or TSO–C154b,
as applicable, is installed on the aircraft.
(b) An indication of the aircraft’s
lateral and longitudinal position. This
message element is derived from the
aircraft’s navigation position sensor 16
and would provide an accurate position
based on latitude, longitude, and
accuracy values for the display of
information in a format that meets ATC
requirements. This information is
critical to the safe and efficient
separation of aircraft.
(c) An indication of the aircraft’s
barometric pressure altitude. This
message element would provide ATC
with the aircraft’s altitude information.
Currently, § 91.217 requires Mode C and
Mode S transponders to transmit
pressure altitude. It is critical that the
altitude transmitted by the Mode C and
Mode S transponders is identical to that
in the ADS–B transmission. Therefore,
in addition to this proposed data
element, we believe that § 91.217 should
be amended as well. Section 91.217
requires Mode C and Mode S
transponders to transmit pressure
altitude. We propose to revise § 91.217
to also apply to the ADS–B transmission
16 The aircraft’s navigation position sensor is
discussed in detail in section IV.4. of this preamble.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
of altitude to ensure that the reported
altitude from various avionics is
consistent.
(d) An indication of the aircraft’s
velocity. This message element is also
derived from the aircraft’s navigation
position sensor and would provide ATC
with the aircraft’s airspeed with a
clearly stated direction and describes
the rate at which an aircraft changes its
position.
(e) An indication if TCAS II or ACAS
is installed and operating in a mode
that may generate resolution advisory
alerts. This information would identify
to ATC whether an aircraft is equipped
with TCAS II or a later version or its
European equivalent ACAS, and
whether that equipment is operating in
a mode that may generate resolution
advisory alerts.
(f) For aircraft with an operable TCAS
II or ACAS, an indication if a resolution
advisory is in progress. Both TCAS II
and ACAS improve safety by detecting
impending airborne collisions or
incursions and issuing commands to the
pilot on how to avoid the hazard by
climbing or descending. If two aircraft
get too close to each other, the aircrafts’
TCAS II or ACAS systems will provide
a resolution advisory (RA), which gives
the pilots a command to climb or
descend to avoid the other aircraft. The
RA command is provided independent
of ATC instructions. It is critical for
ATC to know why an aircraft is
climbing or descending, i.e., responding
to an RA, ATC instruction, or a previous
flight plan path. ATC may respond more
efficiently and safely in managing the
air traffic environment by knowing
whether an aircraft is responding to an
RA.
(g) An indication if ATC services are
requested. (Requires flight crew entry.)
This message element would identify to
air traffic controllers if services are
requested and whether the aircraft is in
fact receiving ATC services.
(h) An indication of the Mode 3/A
transponder code specified by ATC.
(Requires flight crew entry.) All
transponder-equipped aircraft on
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) flights are
directed by ATC to ‘‘squawk’’ a unique
four-digit code, commonly referred to as
a ‘‘Mode 3/A transponder code.’’ All
transponder equipped aircraft on Visual
Flight Rules (VFR) flights are directed
by ATC to squawk 1200. The assigned
Mode 3/A transponder code is used by
ATC to identify each aircraft operating
under IFR, and the 1200 transponder
code identifies aircraft operating under
VFR.
An aircraft equipped with ADS–B Out
continually broadcasts its state vector
(3-dimensional position and 3-
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
dimensional velocity). It is critical for
ATC to correlate and verify that the
ADS–B Out information transmitted
from each aircraft is displayed and
identified correctly on the ATC radar
display. Therefore, it is imperative that
the ATC-assigned transponder code be
identical to the assigned transponder
code in the ADS–B Out message. If the
aircraft’s avionics are not capable of
allowing a single point of entry for the
transponder and ADS–B Out Mode 3A
code, the pilot would have to ensure
that conflicting codes are not
transmitted to ATC. Operational
procedures would have to be developed,
including specific guidance,
instructions, or training material
provided by the equipment
manufacturer, as well as the operator
training programs, manuals, Operations
Specifications, and Letters of
Authorization, to ensure that conflicting
codes are not transmitted to ATC.
(i) An indication of the aircraft’s call
sign that is submitted on the flight plan,
or the aircraft’s registration number.
(Aircraft call sign requires flight crew
entry.) This message element would
correlate flight plan information with
the data that ATC views on the radar
display and facilitate ATC
communication with the aircraft. The
aircraft’s call sign or registration number
broadcast in the ADS–B message would
have to be identical to information
contained in its flight plan.
(j) An indication if the flight crew has
identified an emergency, and if so, the
emergency status being transmitted.
(Requires flight crew entry.) This
message element would alert ATC that
the aircraft is experiencing emergency
conditions and indicate the type of
emergency. Applicable emergency codes
would be found in the Aeronautical
Information Manual. This information
would alert ATC to potential danger to
the aircraft so it could take appropriate
action.
(k) An indication of the aircraft’s
‘‘IDENT’’ to ATC. (Requires flight crew
entry.) ATC may request an aircraft to
‘‘IDENT,’’ to aid controllers to quickly
identify a specific aircraft. The pilot
manually inputs the aircraft’s identity,
which then highlights the aircraft on the
ATC scope. When activated, this
message element allows identification of
the aircraft with which ATC is in
communication.
(l) An indication of the aircraft’s
assigned ICAO 24-bit address. ICAO 24bit codes are unique and assigned to
each individual aircraft. These codes are
necessary for aircraft used for
international operations. This code
would provide the FAA with the future
capability to identify aircraft using the
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
ICAO 24-bit address. This capability
addresses limits on future capacity due
to the finite number of aircraft that can
be tracked with discrete transponder
codes.
(m) An indication of the emitter
category. If ATC knows the emitter
category, it can determine separation
minima based in part on a particular
aircraft’s wake vortex. This information
would be used to provide air traffic
controllers and ground crews with more
efficient information regarding a
particular aircraft’s constraints and
capabilities. Once the emitter category is
set at installation, it would not change.
(Refer to TSO–C166a or TSO–C154b for
additional information.) Some examples
of emitter categories to be used (as
specified in RTCA DO–260A, DO–242A,
and DO–282A) include, but are not
limited to, the following:
• Light (ICAO)—7,000 kg (15,500 lbs)
or less.
• Small aircraft—7,000 kg to 34,000
kg (15,500 lbs to 75,000 lbs).
• Large aircraft—34,000 kg to 136,000
kg (75,000 lbs to 300,00 lbs).
• High vortex large (i.e., B–757).
• Heavy aircraft (ICAO)—136,000 kg
(300,000 lbs) or more.
• Rotorcraft.
(n) An indication whether a cockpit
display of traffic information (CDTI) is
installed and operable. This message
element would alert ATC as to whether
an aircraft has an operable CDTI 17
installed. A CDTI is necessary for
aircraft to have ADS–B In capability.
This message element would indicate to
ATC which aircraft are capable of
receiving ADS–B In services.
(o) An indication of the aircraft’s
geometric altitude. The geometric
altitude is a measure of altitude
provided by a satellite-based position
service, determined mathematically,
based on a three-dimensional position
in space. This message element is
necessary to confirm accuracy or
discrepancies between geometric and
barometric altitude, which changes as a
function of air pressure in the
environment. The message element
would serve as a tool for validating
positioning services.
17 CDTI is the function of presenting surveillance
traffic information (e.g., airborne or surface) to the
flight crew. To display traffic, the CDTI may use a
dedicated display or a shared multi-function
display (MFD) device. The CDTI is capable of
displaying position information for nearby aircraft
and ADS–B-equipped airport surface vehicles. The
CDTI consolidates ADS–B traffic targets, terrain,
weather, and other products relative to the pilot’s
own aircraft or flight operation. It allows pilots to
display textual and graphical information provided
by the ADS–B System and Broadcast Services.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
4. Navigation Position Sensor and the
Accuracy and Integrity of the ADS–B
Message
ADS–B Out continuously transmits
aircraft information through the selected
broadcast data links of 1090ES or UAT.
The aircraft’s lateral and longitudinal
position and velocity are proposed data
elements transmitted in the broadcast
message. The navigation position sensor
is equipment onboard the aircraft that
computes a geodetic position (latitude
and longitude) that can be a separate
sensor or integrated into other
navigation equipment or system
onboard the aircraft. (Examples of such
equipment are LORAN C, GPS, GPS–
WAAS, DME/DME and Inertial
Reference Unit (IRU).)
The accuracy and integrity of these
broadcast message elements transmitted
from the aircraft to the ground stations
depends on the aircraft’s navigation
position sensor and the signal source
from which the position is derived. The
accuracy and integrity of the transmitted
aircraft position and velocity are critical
for use in surveillance and various
airborne and surface applications. The
accuracy and integrity of transmitted
information expressed by ADS–B
avionics is measured by the Navigation
Accuracy Category for Position (NACp),
the Navigation Accuracy Category for
Velocity (NACv), the NIC and the SIL.
An aircraft transmitting its position
and velocity with the accuracy and
integrity proposed in part 91, Appendix
H, Section 3 (ADS–B Out Performance
Requirements for NIC, NAC, and SIL)
would be more accurately identified by
ATC than it would be in today’s radar
environment. The confidence with
respect to the accuracy of the position
and velocity reported by ADS–B Out
would enable the future applications
discussed further in this proposal that
simply could not be provided by
existing surveillance systems. While
existing surveillance systems provide
information that is sufficient for
separation purposes and the capacity
needs of today’s traffic environment, a
more responsive and versatile ATC
system will need improved accuracy
and integrity of broadcast information
for future surveillance performance. The
values proposed would ensure that the
information ATC receives has the level
of performance and the requisite
confidence in the accuracy of that
information necessary to control
aircraft. Increasing the quality and
standards for surveillance information
presents new opportunities for
efficiency and capacity improvements
in the NAS, and the potential for future
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56955
self-separation or air-to-air applications
of ADS–B.
The NACp specifies the accuracy of
the aircraft’s horizontal position
information (latitude and longitude) and
the vertical geometric position
transmitted from the aircraft’s avionics.
All aircraft position information has a
margin of error and the accuracy
category specifies that margin. The
NACp specifies with 95 percent
probability that the reported
information is correct within an
associated allowance. (The horizontal
95% bound error allowance resembles
an imaginary circle around the aircraft
with a radius equivalent to the NACp
defined value.) ATC and aircraft
equipped for ADS–B In would monitor
the NACp reporting to ensure that the
accuracy supports the intended
operational use. Not all navigation
position sensors are capable of
providing the necessary aircraft
information with the accuracy and
integrity needed to support certain
surveillance applications.18 In order to
use ADS–B Out for surveillance and
separation, the NACp value must have
a small margin of error in position
reporting.
In today’s radar surveillance
environment, aircraft position accuracy
is required to be within 0.3 NM for
operations in the en route airspace, and
0.1 NM for operations within terminal
area airspace. An aircraft broadcasting
its position with a NACp equal to or
greater than 7 would provide a
horizontal position accuracy of at least
0.1 NM with no specific requirement for
vertical (geometric) position accuracy.
Aircraft position reported at a NACp
equal to or greater than 7 would meet
the minimum radar accuracy
requirement for terminal area operations
and exceed radar performance for en
route operations. Therefore, the FAA
believes that the minimum accuracy
requirement necessary to maintain an
equivalent level of surveillance in the
terminal airspace area (and provide for
equivalent separation as that in today’s
radar environment) would be a NACp of
7. The FAA is not, however, engaging in
this rulemaking simply to meet the level
of surveillance that exists in the current
infrastructure, or to establish a new
surveillance system that would only
enable separation performance
equivalent to that realized today. ADS–
B performance is intended to go beyond
today’s standards for accuracy and
provide a platform for NextGen. In order
to accomplish that goal, we propose a
minimum accuracy value of NACp 9 in
18 Surveillance applications are discussed further
in Section V of this NPRM.
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
56956
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
all airspace areas that ADS–B would be
required. This proposed accuracy
requirement would provide horizontal
position information for ADS–B Out
equipped aircraft to within 30 meters
(0.016NM) horizontally and vertical
(geometric) position accuracy to within
45 meters. This proposed accuracy
requirement could make it possible for
future airspace separation to be reduced
from today’s current separation minima.
At this time the FAA cannot determine
the extent to which separation standards
might be reduced. Significant testing
and certification is required before any
reduction in separation standards might
be applied. The FAA may examine the
possible reduction of separation
standards once ADS–B has been
certified to meet existing separation
standards safely and consistently.
Under this proposal, any aircraft not
operating with at least this level of
performance would not be permitted in
the designated airspace without first
obtaining authorization from ATC. If the
aircraft broadcast message element for
position has an NACp of less than 9,
ATC would be notified and it could
choose to revert to a backup system or
apply procedural mitigation.
This proposed NACp of 9 would also
provide the necessary accuracy to
enable certain applications on the
surface at the nation’s busiest airports.
For various operational applications
including situational awareness and
traffic alerting, it would be necessary for
aircraft position accuracy to be
transmitted with an error of 30 meters
or less horizontally, particularly for
surface operations. The proposed
requirement for an NACp equal to or
better than 9 would meet the 30 meter
or less performance requirement for
surface operations and would apply to
all aircraft equipped with ADS–B Out.
If the aircraft broadcast message element
for position has an NACp of less than 9,
ATC and aircraft equipped with ADS–
B In would be automatically notified
that the ADS–B Out performance for a
particular aircraft is degraded and
therefore, the information is unusable to
support either situational awareness on
the surface or awareness of runway
occupancy on approach to airports. The
NACp values are specified in greater
detail in RTCA/DO–260A and RTCA/
DO–282A, which are recognized
performance standards by the applicable
TSOs identified under this proposal.
The NACv is a measured value similar
to the NACp value except that it applies
to the computed velocity derived from
navigation position sensor or navigation
system. In accordance with TSO–C166a
and TSO–C154b, which recognize the
performance standards of DO–260A and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
DO–282A respectively, the NACv must
be greater than or equal to 1. This means
that the estimate of aircraft velocity
must be accurate to within 10 meters
per second and must be reported with
95 percent probability.
NIC differs from NAC in that a NIC
value specifies aircraft integrity
containment often referred to as the
‘‘containment radius,’’ which is the
maximum error for the broadcast
position as described in RTCA/DO–
260A, Change 2 and DO–282A, Change
1. NIC and NAC performance values
will vary depending upon the
positioning service and navigation
position sensor. NIC/NAC values may
be enhanced or degraded by external
NAS infrastructure or by characteristics
of avionics systems performance. For
instance, a GPS outage would interrupt
the integrity and accuracy of the
broadcast information. Avionics failures
also could degrade expected
performance. The NIC value is broadcast
so that surveillance services may
determine whether the horizontal and
vertical (geometric) position meets an
acceptable level of integrity
containment for the intended operation
or phase of flight. For ADS–B Out, the
FAA proposes a NIC value of 7. This
value would bound the error to within
0.2 NM. The NIC parameter combined
with the SIL parameter described in the
next paragraph provides integrity
assurance in broadcast position.
The SIL specifies the ADS–B Out
avionics integrity level and the
probability that the position error may
be larger than the reported NIC. The SIL
may be configured at the time of
installation. SIL is typically based on
the design assurance level 19 of the
ADS–B Out avionics and its navigation
position sensor. While a NIC value
varies based on computed navigation
sensor position, SIL is typically a static
(unchanging) value for the ADS–B Out
avionics. For example, while the NIC is
dependent on the satellite constellation
(or number of available satellites), the
SIL’s reporting of the installed ADS–B
avionics is not dependent upon the
satellite constellation and would not be
affected by changes in the number of
19 ADS–B Out avionics design assurance is
dependent on both the hardware and software
levels. There are 5 hardware design assurance
failure classifications; (1) Catastrophic, (2)
Hazardous/Severe-Major, (3) Major, (4) Minor, and
(5) No Safety Effect. RTCA/DO–178B ‘‘Software
Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment
Certification’’ software classifications are; (1) Level
A, (2) Level B, (3) Level C, (4) Level D, and (5) Level
E which directly map to the hardware design
assurance failure classifications. The minimum
requirement for systems development assurance for
ADS–B Out is a hardware design assurance (failure
classification) of ‘‘major’’ dependent upon RTCA/
DO–178B Level ‘‘C’’ software.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
available satellites being used in the
derived position. To achieve
performance at least equivalent to
existing radar systems, the FAA
proposes a SIL of 2 or better. This value
would provide integrity assurance that
meets a failure rate probability of 99.999
per flight hour.
The proposed NIC, NACp, NACv, and
SIL requirements would support not
only ATC services, but also advisory
applications for those who choose to
equip aircraft with ADS–B In. The
proposed values for accuracy and
integrity would meet the needs of all the
ADS–B In applications discussed in this
proposal. Terminal area and surface
applications such as Final Approach
and Runway Occupancy Awareness
would not be enabled unless all aircraft
in the surface environment report their
position accurately on runways and
taxiways (NACp equal to or greater than
9). Universal compliance with accuracy
and integrity requirements would
ensure that ADS–B In applications
could provide accurate data even in a
closely spaced environment such as an
airport surface.
This proposal specifies performance
standards for aircraft avionics
equipment for operation to enable ADS–
B Out. These performance standards
would accommodate and facilitate the
use of new technology. Presently, GPS
augmented by the Wide Area
Augmentation System (WAAS) is the
only navigation position service that
provides the level of accuracy and
integrity (NIC, NACp, and NACv) to
enable ADS–B Out to be used for NASbased surveillance operations with
sufficient availability. The FAA is
considering whether other navigation
position systems such as the Global
Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)
combined with tightly coupled inertial
navigation systems are also capable of
meeting the proposed performance
standards. Other types of positioning
systems that meet the requisite
performance requirements may be
developed in the future, and may
include satellite constellations similar
to the Galileo system, or tightly coupled
IRU to existing GPS. At this point,
however, the agency is still studying the
ability of these other navigation position
systems to meet the performance
standards articulated in this proposal.
In order to meet the proposed
performance requirements using the
GPS/WAAS system, aircraft would be
required to have equipment installed
onboard the aircraft that meets one of
the following: (1) TSO–C145b, Airborne
Navigation Sensors using the GPS
augmented by WAAS; or (2) TSO–C146b
Stand-Alone Airborne Navigation
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
Equipment using the GPS augmented by
WAAS.
5. ADS–B Aircraft Antenna Diversity
and Transmit Power Requirements
The aircraft antenna is an important
part of the overall ADS–B Out system
because antennas are major contributors
to the system link performance. The
location, number of antennas and
transmit power required for the airborne
ADS–B Out system is a function of the
equipment class for the selected
broadcast link (UAT or 1090ES). This
proposal specifies the classes of 1090ES
and UAT equipment that would meet
the performance standards for ADS–B
Out. The equipment classes include
requirements for aircraft antenna
diversity and transmit power, as
explained below.
Optimal link performance requires
both a top and bottom antenna (antenna
diversity). Accordingly, the agency is
proposing to require that the aircraft be
equipped with both a top and bottom
antenna to support ADS–B Out
applications as well as future air-to-air
ADS–B In applications. Antenna
diversity is a requirement of the
equipment classes identified in the
proposed rule.
For aircraft already equipped with a
Mode S transponder (TSO–C112), which
incorporates antenna diversity, no
additional antennas would be required
for ADS–B Out using 1090ES. For ADS–
B In, however, additional 1090 MHz
receive antennas may be necessary
depending on the additional avionics
equipment installed on the aircraft. It
may be possible to share the TCAS 1090
MHz receiver, as long as it can be shown
that TCAS performance is not degraded.
This shared approach is addressed in
TSO–C166a.
For ADS–B installations using UAT, it
may be possible to share the aircraft’s
existing bottom ATCRBS transponder
(TSO–C74c) antenna through the use of
an antenna diplexer, thus only requiring
installation of a top antenna.
Specifications for the diplexer are
addressed in TSO–C154b. This dual
antenna system would not result in
degraded performance relative to that
which would have been produced by a
single system having a bottom-mounted
antenna.
Antennas would also have to transmit
their signal at a certain level of power
in order to ensure that transmitted
signals are received by ground stations,
and by ADS–B In equipped aircraft and
vehicles. The UAT requires a 16 watt
minimum transmit power. Therefore,
aircraft equipped with the UAT would
be required to have Class A1H, A2, A3,
or B1 equipment, as defined in TSO–
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
C154b. The 1090ES broadcast link
requires a 125 watt minimum transmit
power. Correspondingly, aircraft
operating with 1090ES would also be
required to have Class A1, A2, A3 or B1
equipment, as defined in TSO–C166a.
The transmitted power level supports
the coverage requirements for each
equipment class, including the impact
of loss of antenna system performance.
These proposed antenna requirements
are necessary so that receivers of the
ADS–B system on the ground and in
other aircraft could receive ADS–B Out
messages with sufficient strength,
consistency, and update rate to provide
the necessary information for
surveillance and broadcast services.
6. Latency of the ADS–B Out Broadcast
Message Elements
This proposal defines the latency for
the ADS–B message from the time
information enters the aircraft through
the aircraft antenna(s) until the time it
is transmitted from the aircraft. A
specific limit between the time the
information is received and then
processed through onboard avionics is
necessary to ensure timely transmission
of information and to realize the
benefits of the ADS–B system. As
discussed previously, ADS–B Out
transmits accurate and timely
information more frequently than
information transmitted under the
current radar surveillance system. With
ADS–B, information is sent to the
aircraft from satellites, processed on the
aircraft and sent to ground stations. The
information would enter the aircraft
through an antenna(s), be processed by
the onboard avionics (e.g., navigation
sensor, navigation processor, and either
1090ES or UAT broadcast links), then
transmitted to the ground stations
through another antenna(s) on either the
1090 or 978 MHz frequencies,
depending upon the aircraft’s avionics.
Under this proposal, the navigation
sensor would process information
received by the aircraft’s antenna(s) and
forward this information to the ADS–B
broadcast link avionics in less than 0.5
seconds. That processed information
would then be transmitted in the ADS–
B message from the ADS–B Out
broadcast link avionics in less than 1.0
second from the time it was received
from the navigation sensor. This latency
would support the proposed
requirement that the aircraft transmit its
position and velocity at least once per
second while airborne, or while the
aircraft is moving on the surface.
Additionally, the aircraft would be
required to transmit its position
information at least once every 5
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56957
seconds while stationary on the airport
surface.
Latency requirements for the
reception and processing of ADS–B Out
by the ground station for display to the
ATC automation system are described in
the FAA surveillance and broadcast
services acquisition documents.20
7. Maintenance
This NPRM would not require
additional maintenance requirements
for the installation of ADS–B avionics
equipment. The current requirements of
14 CFR 21.50, ‘‘Instructions for
continued airworthiness and
manufacturer’s maintenance manuals
having airworthiness limitations
sections,’’ are applicable to all ADS–B
equipment. Since any alteration of
equipment is subject to the
requirements of that section, the
existing requirements would apply to
any new avionics equipment installed
in an aircraft.
C. Operational Procedures
1. Applicability
With specific and limited exceptions,
the ADS–B Out performance
requirements proposed here would
apply to all aircraft operating in certain
U.S. designated airspace.21 These
requirements would be applicable to
operations conducted by domestic and
foreign operators in U.S. territorial
airspace. The efficiency and capacity
benefits that can be realized with ADS–
B Out are largely obtainable if all
aircraft are equipped for ADS–B Out
broadcast. There are some aircraft,
however, that were not originally
certified with an electrical system, or
that have not been subsequently
certified with such a system installed,
for which installation of equipment that
meets ADS–B Out performance
standards is impractical. These aircraft
may include certain airplanes, balloons,
and gliders. There may be instances
where a pilot of an aircraft without an
electrical system (such as a glider) may
want to operate in airspace where ADS–
B Out performance standards would be
required under this proposal. The
procedures for requesting authorization
to enter the airspace where ADS–B is
required would be the same procedures
used today for aircraft not equipped
with a transponder to enter certain
airspace. In these cases, an operator may
request an ATC authorization to operate
20 Final Program Requirements for Surveillance
and Broadcast Services, En Route and Oceanic
Services, Air Traffic Organization, Federal Aviation
Administration.
21 See section IV.c.2. for a further discussion of
the airspace where ADS–B Out would be required.
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
56958
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
in the airspace and the FAA addresses
those requests on a case-by-case basis.
In formulating this proposal, the FAA
considered various options including
whether to require ADS–B Out
performance standards for aircraft based
on the type of operation conducted (e.g.,
part 121 and 135 operations), or based
on the type of aircraft (e.g., large or
small). The agency concluded that there
is no distinguishing operational need for
differing performance standards based
on aircraft type or category of the
operation, as many different types of
operators and aircraft operate in the
same airspace.
The FAA also considered proposing
ADS–B Out performance standards for
aircraft operations at and above
specified altitudes. Since aircraft
operate at various altitudes between the
en route and terminal environments,
this option was dismissed as confusing
to pilots and impractical to implement.
ADS–B requirements based on specific
altitudes could result in different
equipment requirements applying
within different segments of the same
class of airspace.
Lastly, the FAA considered whether
to propose ADS–B Out for all aircraft
operations in domestic airspace (Classes
A–G). Domestic airspace includes
airspace over the territorial United
States that extends out to 12 NM from
the coastline that is controlled by ATC
(Classes A, B, C, D, and E) and
uncontrolled airspace (Classes G). While
this would result in almost 100% of
aircraft meeting ADS–B Out
performance requirements and increase
the number of identifiable aircraft in the
NAS, it also would place an
unnecessary financial and operational
burden on aircraft operators who do not
operate in controlled airspace, or who
are not under ATC surveillance.
2. Airspace
In February 1988, the FAA
promulgated an ATC transponder and
altitude reporting equipment final rule,
which established § 91.215 of 14 CFR
and articulated the operating
requirements for ATC transponder and
altitude reporting equipment and use.22
The rule specifies the airspace for which
Mode A/C, and S transponders are
required, and the process for when an
operator may request a deviation from
the transponder requirements. Under
§ 91.215, transponders are required for
all aircraft operating in Classes A, B,
and C airspace areas, and in all airspace
at and above 10,000 feet MSL over the
22 Transponder with Automatic Altitude
Reporting Capability Requirement, 53 FR 4306;
February 12, 1988.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
48 contiguous United States and the
District of Columbia. In addition,
transponders are required for operations
within 30 NM of an airport listed in 14
CFR part 91, Appendix D, from the
surface upwards to 10,000 feet MSL.
(The airports listed in Appendix D are
in Class B airspace areas.) 23
ADS–B Out would provide for
enhanced surveillance in areas where
SSR surveillance currently exists.
Consequently, the FAA believes that it
is reasonable to require that aircraft
meet the performance requirements
necessary for ADS–B Out for operation
in airspace that currently requires
transponders. Similar to § 91.215,
proposed § 91.225 would require that
aircraft meet ADS–B Out performance
requirements to operate in Class A,
Class B, and Class C airspace areas, and
in Class E airspace areas at and above
10,000 ft MSL over the 48 contiguous
United States and the District of
Columbia. In addition, this proposal
would require that aircraft meet ADS–B
Out performance requirements to
operate in Class E airspace over the Gulf
of Mexico, from the coastline of the
United States out to 12 NM at and above
3,000 feet MSL. Similar to the
transponder requirements, ADS–B Out
also would be required within 30 NM of
an airport listed in 14 CFR part 91,
appendix D, from the surface upward to
10,000 feet MSL.
This proposal would permit aircraft
not originally certificated with an
electrical system or not subsequently
certified with such a system installed
(such as a balloon or glider) to conduct
operations without ADS–B Out in the
airspace within 30 NM of an airport
listed in part 91 appendix D if the
operations are conducted: (1) Outside
any Class B or Class C airspace area; and
(2) below the altitude of the ceiling of
a Class B or Class C airspace area
designated for an airport or 10,000 feet
MSL, whichever is lower.
Generally, Class A airspace is that
airspace from 18,000 feet MSL to and
including FL 600, including the airspace
overlying the waters within 12 NM of
the coastline of the United States. This
proposal would not require aircraft to
meet the proposed ADS–B Out
performance standards for aircraft that
23 This section excludes from the transponder
requirements all aircraft not originally certificated
with an electrical system or not subsequently
certified with such a system installed, such as
balloons or gliders. These operations may be
conducted in the airspace within 30 nautical miles
of an airport listed in part 91 appendix D provided
that the operations are conducted: (1) Outside any
Class A, Class B, or Class C airspace area; and (2)
below the altitude of the ceiling of a Class B or Class
C airspace area designated for any airport or 10,000
feet MSL, whichever is lower.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
operate in Class A airspace that extends
beyond 12 NM from the U.S. coastline
and that do not enter U.S. territorial
airspace.24
Class B airspace is designated from
the surface to 10,000 feet MSL
surrounding the nation’s busiest airports
in terms of airport operations or
passenger enplanements. (Class B
airspace areas generally are configured
and appear as an upside down wedding
cake.) The configuration of each Class B
airspace area is individually tailored
and consists of a surface area and two
or more layers, and is designed to
contain all published instrument
procedures. An ATC clearance is
required for all aircraft to operate in the
area, and all aircraft that are cleared
receive separation services within the
airspace. Under this proposal, ADS–B
Out would be required for aircraft
operating in Class B airspace areas. In
addition, for those airports listed in part
91 appendix D, ADS–B Out would be
required for operations within 30 NM of
the airport from the surface up to 10,000
feet MSL. This area can experience a
high volume of aircraft operations and
complex transitions from the en route
environment to the terminal area around
the nation’s busiest airports.
Consequently, we expect ADS–B Out to
result in better surveillance across a
larger area, leading to better ATC
situational awareness.
Generally, Class C airspace is
designated from the surface to 4,000 feet
above the airport elevation surrounding
those airports that have an operational
control tower, are serviced by a radar
approach control, and have a certain
number of IFR operations or passenger
enplanements. Although the
configuration of each Class C area is
individually tailored, the airspace
usually consists of a surface area with
a 5 NM radius and an outer circle
within a 10 NM radius that extends
from no lower than 1,200 feet up to
4,000 feet above the airport elevation.
Each person must establish two-way
radio communications with the ATC
facility providing air traffic services
prior to entering the airspace and must
thereafter maintain those
communications while within the
airspace.
Similar to the transponder
requirements, we are proposing that all
24 There are numerous Offshore Airspace Areas
that are designated as Class A airspace and the
boundaries of those airspace areas extend beyond
12 NM from the coastline of the U.S. into
international waters. Under agreement with ICAO,
the U.S. provides ATC services in these areas and
may designate the airspace accordingly in order to
indicate to pilots the type of ATC services that may
be provided.
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
aircraft in Class E airspace of the 48
contiguous United States and the
District of Columbia, at and above
10,000 feet MSL, meet ADS–B Out
performance requirements.
Additionally, the FAA proposes that
aircraft operating in Class E airspace
over the Gulf of Mexico, from the
coastline of the United States out to 12
NM at and above 3,000 feet MSL, meet
the performance requirements for ADS–
B Out. The proposed 3,000 feet MSL
will be the lowest altitude that
surveillance and communication
coverage will exist for the purposes of
ATC services. The rule is restricted to
12 NM from the coastline, which is the
extent of the NAS in that area.
This proposal includes an option for
pilots to request an authorization from
ATC to operate in certain designated
airspace with aircraft that do not meet
the ADS–B Out performance standards.
As stated previously, aircraft that do not
have an electrical system, and therefore
are not ADS–B Out compliant, may
receive an ATC authorization to operate
in the designated airspace. This
provision would provide ATC with the
flexibility to control aircraft that may
have been directed to turn off ADS–B or
to reroute non-equipped aircraft through
a regulated area if that is necessary for
safety.25
ATC authorizations may contain
conditions necessary to provide a level
of safety equivalent to operation by an
aircraft equipped with ADS–B Out
equipment. ATC may not be able to
grant authorization in all cases.
3. Pilot Procedures
In accordance with proper preflight
actions,26 each operator would have to
verify ADS–B Out availability for the
flight planned route through the
appropriate flight planning information
sources. If the aircraft cannot meet the
proposed performance requirements
using a given position service, the
operator would have to use either a
different, available position service, reroute, or reschedule the flight. Under
this proposal, pilot procedures are
expected to be minimal. Pilots would
have to: (1) Check that the ADS–B
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
25 If
the Air Traffic Controller identifies that the
aircraft avionics is not operating properly (such as
providing erroneous or incomplete information),
the pilot would be instructed to turn off the
avionics. A simple switch or button in the cockpit
to disable ADS–B avionics would provide this
feature. Aircraft would then be controlled using the
backup surveillance system or procedurally. This is
similar to the methods used today in removing
faulty transponder information from a controllers
display. Pilots currently have the capability to turn
off transponders. Aircraft are then handled
procedurally or through primary radar returns.
26 See 14 CFR 91.103.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
avionics equipment is turned on and
operating properly; (2) ensure that
message elements (g)–(k) of part 91,
appendix H, section 4 are entered
during the appropriate phase of flight;
(3) turn off the ADS–B equipment if
directed by ATC; and (4) if notified by
ATC that the aircraft’s ADS–B
information is not being transmitted,
request special handling that may
include accommodation (on a case-bycase basis), or direction to exit the
present airspace.
4. Backup Surveillance Strategy
The FAA recognizes there are
vulnerabilities in using a GPS system as
the aircraft’s position service. There are
times when GPS may be unreliable in
certain areas and during certain times
due to planned testing or solar flare
activity. Unintentional interference is
historically infrequent in the U.S. In the
event of GPS outages, a backup strategy
is necessary for ATC to continue
surveillance capability.
The FAA identified and analyzed
several potential backup strategies. The
strategies varied from SSR, active and
passive multilateration, Distance
Measuring Equipment (DME)/IRU,
Satellite Navigation (SATNAV), and
combinations thereof. The FAA
reviewed the cost estimates and
performance of the various
combinations and conducted
comparative safety assessments. In May
2006, the Surveillance/Positioning
Backup Strategy Technical Team was
formed to review candidate strategies.
The team members consisted of
representatives from air transport,
general aviation, avionics
manufacturers, and the FAA’s Aircraft
Certification Service and Air Traffic
Organization. In addition, a steering
committee was organized under the
RTCA ADS–B Working Group and the
RTCA Air Traffic Management Advisory
Committee to ensure that user needs
were being addressed.
The FAA specified that the backup
strategy must meet certain minimum
requirements to meet the needs of the
airspace users. The strategy must be able
to support ATC surveillance to at least
the same extent as current back up
surveillance capabilities. In other
words, at least the same level of
capacity must be maintained during a
loss of GPS signal as would be
experienced during a comparative loss
of radar services today in both the
terminal and en route areas over several
days.27
27 Generally, a loss of radar services for a given
area is mitigated in one of several ways: by
providing terminal capabilities (e.g., 3 NM
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56959
The FAA has concluded that a
strategy of maintaining a reduced
network of SSRs best meets the agency’s
back up needs given the limitations of
ADS–B surveillance capabilities. Under
this strategy, secondary radar services
will be provided in high density
terminal airspace (surrounding
approximately the top 40 airports in
terms of capacity), all en route airspace
above 18,000 feet MSL, and medium
density terminal airspace above certain
altitudes, as determined by proximate
en route SSR coverage (identical to
today’s Center Radar Automated Radar
Terminal Systems Processing (CENRAP)
coverage). This approach would require
retaining 40 terminal SSRs and 150 en
route SSRs beyond 2020, which is
approximately one-half of the quantity
in use today. Primary surveillance radar
services will be retained in all terminal
areas covered by primary radar today
(approximately 200 locations), to serve
as the means of mitigating single aircraft
avionics failures. No new avionics
would be required to support this
strategy. The legacy transponders (Mode
A/C/S) continue to support secondary
radar surveillance. A copy of the FAA’s
Surveillance/Positioning Backup
Strategy Alternatives Analysis Final
Report, dated December 8, 2006, has
been placed in the docket for this
rulemaking.
During interference outages of GNSS
(scheduled or unscheduled), the FAA
expects to revert to the backup groundbased surveillance system and
temporarily allow operations without
ADS–B Out in required airspace. Pilots
would be notified of such action via the
Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) system. The
FAA also expects to revert to the backup
surveillance system during significant
degradation in the GPS constellation.
When deciding to issue NOTAMs to
allow operations by aircraft with
inoperable ADS–B Out equipment, the
FAA will weigh the impact of denying
airspace access to those aircraft that do
not comply with the performance
requirements against the reduction in
operational capability due to the
limitations of the backup surveillance
system.
5. Compliance Schedule for ADS–B Out
Requirements
The FAA proposes that affected
aircraft meet ADS–B Out performance
requirements by January 1, 2020. The
FAA’s schedule for ADS–B Out calls for
separations) with reduced coverage using a nearby
terminal radar; by providing en route capabilities
(e.g., 5 NM separations) with reduced coverage
using the nearest en route radar; or by reversion to
procedural separation if neither of the first two
options are feasible.
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
56960
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
the ground infrastructure, including the
provision of broadcast services, to be in
place and available by the end of 2013
where surveillance exists today. The
FAA is committed to meeting this
schedule, but if unforeseen
circumstances prevent ADS–B Out
services from being available by the end
of 2013 where surveillance exists today,
the FAA would follow notice and
comment rulemaking procedures to
adjust the compliance date. Although
compliance of the rule would not be
necessary until 2020, it is necessary to
have the final requirements published to
allow avionics manufacturers time to
produce compliant equipment. It is also
preferable to give operators time to
schedule equipment installation
consistent with the aircraft’s normal
maintenance cycle. A 10-year
compliance window gives the aviation
community ample time to manage costs
and minimize the impact of ADS–B
installation on their normal operations.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
V. ADS–B In
A. Avionics
The FAA is not proposing to mandate
ADS–B In performance requirements at
this time. While ADS–B In provides
substantial benefits to operators, it has
not been identified as a requirement for
maintaining the safety and efficiency of
NAS operations at this time. However,
this NPRM includes a discussion of
ADS–B In because ADS–B Out
transmissions provide the aircraft
information viewed by the flight crew in
aircraft equipped for ADS–B In.
Operators who voluntarily equip with
ADS–B In could receive additional
benefits compared to those that equip
only with ADS–B Out. ADS–B In
provides the capability to display ADS–
B message information to pilots in the
flight deck. The ADS–B In function is a
combination broadcast link processor
(i.e., it receives information) and flight
deck display.
The ADS–B Out broadcast message
elements support the initial ADS–B In
applications discussed in this proposal.
However, future ADS–B In applications
may require additional broadcast
message elements in the ADS–B Out
transmission. The reason for the
differences is that the information
displayed to ATC may be a subset of
information displayed to the pilots.
Additional ADS–B Out broadcast
message elements beyond those
described in this document could be
needed to support a fully functional
ADS–B In CDTI for future operational
applications. Additional message
elements cannot be defined until future
applications have been developed. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
current set of ADS–B Out message
elements will meet the needs of the
initial services and applications and the
future applications currently pursued by
the FAA.
As some operators may voluntarily
equip with ADS–B In avionics to take
advantage of emerging technology, the
ground infrastructure will be designed
to accommodate ADS–B Out and ADS–
B In. In order to provide ADS–B In
equipped aircraft with the capability to
use the information transmitted, a
service called ADS–R has been
developed. In this proposal, ADS–R is
considered part of the ground
infrastructure that will need to be in
place to enable a fully functional ADS–
B system. ADS–R provides aircraft with
a more complete traffic picture of other
ADS–B equipped aircraft using a
different data-link (i.e., 1090ES versus
UAT). For example, ADS–R takes the
aircraft’s ADS–B information that is
transmitted by 1090ES and ‘‘rebroadcasts’’ that information to any
aircraft that is equipped for ADS–B In
and uses UAT. ADS–R similarly makes
the corresponding rebroadcast of
information from UAT equipped aircraft
to ADS–B In equipped aircraft using
1090ES. As stated previously, this
proposal does not seek to require ADS–
B In. The FAA does realize, however,
that some operators may voluntarily
equip with ADS–B In avionics to take
advantage of emerging technology. The
ADS–B ARC is investigating ways to
encourage operators to equip with ADS–
B prior to the compliance date of the
rule. The FAA will review the ARC’s
recommendations on how to facilitate
the transition between legacy
surveillance and ADS–B.
B. Applications and Services
As this proposal lays the foundation
for the entire ADS–B system, it is
appropriate to briefly discuss the
applications and services that would be
available with ADS–B In. Functions and
associated applications that enable an
aircraft to be able to receive ADS–B
messages from ground stations and from
other aircraft are collectively referred to
as ADS–B In. If aircraft are voluntarily
equipped with ADS–B In, pilots could
see real-time information similar to
what ATC views and have access to
similar services and applications. Pilots
would have better situational awareness
because their flight deck displays would
depict all aircraft equipped with ADS–
B or transponders. Pilots may be able to
use this information to monitor and
maintain safe separation from other
aircraft with fewer instructions from
ATC. At night and in poor visual
conditions, pilots could also see where
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
they are in relation to the ground using
onboard avionics and terrain maps
associated with a multi-function
display. The information would be clear
and accurate regardless of inclement
weather conditions.
Also, like ATC, aircraft CDTIs could
display precise locations of all ADS–B
equipped aircraft and ground vehicles,
along with data that shows their
direction of movement in flight or on
the airport surface. With this
information, pilots would be able to
follow the progress of other aircraft or
ground vehicles using the cockpit
display, and correlate that position by
reference to outside visual cues. The
increased position and traffic awareness
would allow more efficient movement
on airport surfaces by pilots.
Aircraft equipped with ADS–B In
capabilities could receive traffic
information for other aircraft regardless
of whether those aircraft are equipped
with a functional ADS–B system.
Aircraft equipped with ADS–B In would
also be able to identify other ADS–B
equipped aircraft regardless of the
broadcast link being used. This
comprehensive air traffic situational
awareness would be provided by Traffic
Information Service-Broadcast (TIS–B)
until all aircraft are equipped with
ADS–B Out, at which time TIS–B would
be decommissioned and the information
would be transmitted by ADS–R.
Existing radar surveillance information
is provided to ground stations and sent
out on both 1090ES and UAT as a part
of the TIS–B message.
The FAA expects the following two
services and five applications to be
available to operators voluntarily
equipping with ADS–B In:
• Traffic Information ServiceBroadcast (TIS–B). This is a groundbased uplink report of traffic that is
under surveillance by ATC. During
implementation of the ADS–B system,
TIS–B would provide surveillance
information on aircraft that are not yet
ADS–B equipped. The ground
infrastructure would support air-to-air
operations by broadcasting TIS–B
messages on both the 978 MHz UAT and
1090 MHz ES broadcast links for targets
detected and reported by radar or other
surveillance systems. TIS–B would be
available during the transition period
and until all affected aircraft are
equipped for ADS–B Out. Once all
aircraft are equipped to meet ADS–B
Out performance requirements, TIS–B
would be decommissioned as it would
no longer be necessary since aircraft
would receive traffic information
through ADS–B.
• Flight Information ServiceBroadcast (FIS–B). FIS–B provides the
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
broadcast of weather and non-control
advisory information providing users
aeronautical information supporting
safe and efficient operations. FIS–B
products include, but are not limited to,
graphical and textual weather reports
and forecasts, NextGen radar
precipitation information, special use
airspace information, NOTAMS,
electronic pilot reports, and other
similar meteorological and aeronautical
information. FIS–B products would be
uplinked using the 978 MHz UAT
broadcast link, but would not be
available on the 1090 MHz ES broadcast
link. The FIS–B service could
accommodate additional products in the
future. Both government and
commercial sources would provide
uplink products.
The following applications would be
available to all pilots whose aircraft are
voluntarily equipped to receive ADS–B
In messages:
• Airport Surface Situational
Awareness. This application would
reduce the potential for deviations,
errors, and collisions through an
increase in pilots’ situational awareness
while operating an aircraft on the
airport movement area. Pilots would use
a flight deck display to increase
awareness of other traffic positions on
the airport movement area.
Additionally, the display may be used
to determine the position of ground
vehicles, e.g., snowplows, emergency
vehicles, tugs, follow-me vehicles, and
airport maintenance vehicles, if they
meet ADS–B Out performance
requirements. Surface vehicles
operating on the movement area
(runways and taxiways) would need to
be ADS–B Out equipped.
• Final Approach and Runway
Occupancy Awareness. This application
would reduce the likelihood of pilot
errors associated with runway
occupancy and would improve the
capability of the flight crew to detect
ATC errors. It involves using a cockpit
display to depict the runway
environment and display traffic from
the surface up to approximately 1,000
feet AGL on final approach. It would be
used by the flight crew to help
determine runway occupancy.
• Enhanced Visual Acquisition. This
application would provide the pilots
with enhanced traffic situational
awareness in controlled and
uncontrolled airspace and airports. The
application uses a cockpit display to
enhance out-of-the-window visual
acquisition of air traffic. Pilots would
refer to the display during the
instrument scan to supplement visual
observations. The display would be
used to aid in initial detection of an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
aircraft or to receive further information
on an aircraft that has been reported by
ATC. The application provides the
pilots with the relative range, altitude,
and bearing of other aircraft.
• Enhanced Visual Approach. This
application would enhance sequential
approaches for aircraft cleared to
maintain visual separation from another
aircraft on the approach in order to
maintain visual approach procedure
operation arrival rates even during
periods of reduced visibility or
obstructions to vision (e.g., haze, fog,
and sunlight). Pilots would have a
cockpit display of nearby traffic that
would continually update identity and
position information to assist the pilots
with achieving and maintaining visual
contact with relevant traffic. Additional
information such as range and speed
would be provided to assist pilots in
monitoring their distance from the
preceding aircraft. The display may also
be used to monitor aircraft on approach
to parallel runways.
• Conflict Detection. This application
would alert the pilot to potential
conflicts with other aircraft and provide
relevant traffic information. Aircraft
equipped with a cockpit display have
the capability to display aircraft location
and projected flight path. More than
simply displaying traffic, the
application would alert pilots of
developing conflicts. Also, the
surveillance range afforded by ADS–B
would enable alerts to be issued in time
to resolve potential conflicts with
minimum disruption to the flight path.
The conflict detection application is an
ADS–B-enabled capability for properly
equipped aircraft and is not intended as
a TCAS replacement.
ADS–B In is not limited to the
reception of these services and
applications. The ability to receive
ADS–B In messages provides a platform
for services that may be developed in
the future by the FAA or by
independent vendors.
Users with ADS–B In may also have
greater predictability of flight duration
because they would have more
information on the state of air traffic and
the procedures being used by air traffic
controllers to handle traffic. Greater
predictability of arrival and departure
times could allow air carriers to have
ground crews ready sooner, and with
less margin of error. Shared situational
awareness may also allow pilots to
observe patterns in the flight of traffic
around them and may increase the
efficiency of their flight by allowing
them to operate in concert with other
traffic with less radio communication.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56961
VI. FAA Experience With ADS–B
A. Capstone
The Capstone project was initially
proposed as an operational
demonstration program for Alaska in the
Bethel and Yukon-Kuskokwim (Y–K)
Delta area. Flights below 6,000 feet in
the Y–K Delta are conducted in a nonradar environment. The only radar
coverage in the area is high-altitude
coverage for aircraft controlled from
Anchorage. Capstone’s traffic awareness
function, which lets anyone with an
ADS–B receiver see the locations and
altitudes of Capstone-equipped aircraft,
enhances situational awareness to
aircraft operators in the Y–K Delta.
Phase II of Capstone, which extended
the Capstone program into Southeast
Alaska, officially began in March 2003.
The FAA is integrating Phase II of the
Capstone program into the national
ADS–B program. Statewide deployment
of ADS–B is expected to be completed
by 2013.
Special Federal Aviation Regulation
(SFAR) 97 allows suitably equipped
aircraft to conduct IFR Area Navigation
(RNAV) operations in Alaska on
published air traffic routes using TSO–
C145a/C146a navigation systems as the
only means of IFR navigation. It also
allows pilots to conduct IFR en route
RNAV operations in Alaska using
Special Minimum En Route Altitudes
that are outside the operational service
volume of ground-based navigation aids.
This SFAR opened more than 40,000
square miles of airspace that included
more than 1,500 NM of new routes. As
discussed previously, SFAR No. 97
would remain in effect to supplement
the requirements of this proposal.
According to FAA accident statistics
compiled by the MITRE Corporation,
the Capstone safety program reduced
the aircraft fatal accident rates for
Alaska part 135 operators equipped
with Capstone avionics by 45%. While
this accident reduction is not solely
attributable to ADS–B, the ADS–B
information in the flight deck did
provide increased pilot awareness of
surrounding traffic and directly
contributed to the accident rate
reduction. In addition, search and
rescue efforts for individuals in
equipped aircraft have been
dramatically improved over efforts
towards those in non-equipped aircraft.
Knowing a more precise location of the
aircraft’s last known position has
minimized the response times and
reduced the search area.
B. Gulf of Mexico
Air traffic across the Gulf of Mexico
has experienced significant growth over
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
56962
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
the past decade, at a rate twice that of
domestic airspace. The northern portion
of the Gulf of Mexico is home to one of
the largest helicopter fleets in the world.
More than 650 helicopters provide
support for 5,500 off-shore oil and gas
production platforms. The helicopter
fleet in the Gulf of Mexico logs
approximately 2.1 million operations
per year. These operations are contained
in a 500 mile area along the Texas,
Louisiana, and Mississippi coastline,
extending 250 miles into the Gulf of
Mexico. The majority of helicopter
operations take place between the
surface and 7,000 feet. Much of this fleet
flies without the ability to communicate
with or be seen by ATC, or to obtain
current weather data. When IFR
conditions are prevalent, capacity is
reduced nearly 95%. On IFR days, many
operators are forced to cancel flights due
to the lack of both en route and
destination weather information and
surveillance. Adverse weather
conditions impact the region an average
of one day out of every four.
On March 24, 2006, the National
Traffic Safety Board (NTSB) issued
safety recommendations A–06–19
through 23 to the FAA in response to a
helicopter accident that occurred in the
Gulf of Mexico on March 23, 2004.
Specifically, the NTSB recommended,
in A–06–21, that ‘‘FAA should ensure
that the infrastructure for the National
Automatic Dependent SurveillanceBroadcast Program in the Gulf of Mexico
is operational by fiscal year 2010.’’
In May 2006, the FAA established a
cooperative government/industry
business relationship to enhance
communications, weather, and
surveillance capabilities in the Gulf of
Mexico through a Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA). Through the MOA,
the FAA teamed with the Helicopter
Association International and others to
deliver a higher level of aviation service
in the Gulf of Mexico. The FAA plans
to build a Gulf of Mexico infrastructure
to enhance low and high altitude voice
communication and surveillance, and
low altitude weather observation
capability. While chiefly intended for
helicopter use, the enhancements offer
potential benefit to all aircraft operating
in Gulf airspace. The MOA continues in
effect for 5 years and can be renewed.
The FAA plans to install
communications equipment in the
2007/2008 timeframe, weather
equipment in the 2008 timeframe, and
surveillance equipment in the 2008/
2009 timeframe. The FAA expects
initial operational capability of the
communications, weather, and
surveillance equipment in the 2009/
2010 timeframe.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
C. UPS—Louisville
The FAA and the United Parcel
Service (UPS) are working together to
implement a system at Louisville,
Kentucky (SDF) airport that would
increase airport capacity and efficiency
while significantly reducing
vulnerability to runway incursion
events and reduce the events
themselves. UPS and the FAA have
developed a concept to create a system
that would use ADS–B surveillance at
SDF, along with a Surface Management
System and a scheduling and
sequencing system to meet the demands
of the future. ADS–B Out is expected to
be operational on certain UPS aircraft by
fall 2007. UPS is also installing a CDTI
display for certain proposed operational
applications such as merging and
spacing, Surface Area Moving
Management, and CDTI Assisted Visual
Spacing capability in all of its B–757,
B–767, B–747–400, A–300, and MD–11
fleets.
D. Surveillance in Non-Radar Airspace
Today, there are pockets of airspace
across the NAS that are outside of radar
coverage and are managed by ATC using
non-radar procedural separation. While
the FAA has not yet decided whether to
place GBTs in these areas, it could
decide to do so. Since the vast majority
of the fleet would already be equipped
with ADS–B Out, placing GBTs in these
areas would result in the types of
benefits experienced in Alaska and
predicted for the Gulf of Mexico.
Presently ATC controls IFR operations
in non-radar airspace using inefficient
separation techniques and is unable to
provide many advisory services
otherwise available in a surveillance
environment. Consequently, non-radar
separation between aircraft in a nonradar environment within the domestic
U.S. is up to 10 minutes (80 miles for
jet traffic) compared to 3 or 5 miles in
a radar environment. Operators would
realize significant efficiency gains, if
ATC were able to utilize traffic
monitoring techniques currently only
available in a surveillance environment
(e.g., aircraft vectoring and speed
control).
Surveillance capability also allows
ATC to offer other safety-related
services to both VFR and IFR aircraft,
including traffic safety alerts when
aircraft that are on conflicting courses,
minimum safe altitude warnings
(MSAW), and navigational assistance.
VII. ADS–B in Other Countries
The European Organisation for the
Safety of Air Navigation, known as
EUROCONTROL, a cooperative
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
organization of 37 member states in
Europe, is focused on developing a
seamless, pan-European Air Traffic
Management system. In support of its
objective, EUROCONTROL is
considering a plan to install ADS–B
ground broadcast transceivers in
European areas that do not have
adequate radar coverage.
EUROCONTROL proposed guidance is
to use ADS–B for surveillance in
medium density airspace where there is
currently no surveillance capability.
In April 2007, the Australian Civil
Aviation Safety Authority (CASA)
published a Notice of Final Rule Making
(NFRM) 28 adopting operational and
technical standards for aircraft that are
voluntarily equipped for ADS–B
services in Australian airspace. CASA
stated that it will not consider
mandatory use of ADS–B until
Airservices Australia makes a final
decision on the replacement of its
enroute radar systems. Until such
determination is made, operators may
choose to equip with ADS–B to operate
in Australian airspace. Airservices
Australia is installing ADS–B ground
stations for operational use that can
receive and process both RTCA DO–260
and DO–260A transmissions to apply a
5NM air traffic separation standard.29
NAV Canada is deploying ADS–B in
northern Canada to provide surveillance
in the airspace over Hudson Bay where
there currently is no radar coverage
today. Future deployments of ADS–B in
Canadian airspace are targeted for the
Northwest Territories and northern B.C.,
which also do not have radar coverage.
NAV Canada anticipates having ADS–B
in the rest of Canada as a replacement
for, or complement to, radar.
The FAA is working with
EUROCONTROL, Airservices Australia
and NAV CANADA to internationally
harmonize operational concepts and
minimum safety and performance
requirements for ADS–B.
VIII. Alternatives to ADS–B
Multilateration is a non-radar system
that has limited deployment in the U.S.
The FAA considered multilateration as
an alternative to ADS–B. Multilateration
is a process by which an aircraft’s
position is determined by measuring the
time difference between the arrival of
28 This NFRM summarizes the comments
received in response to proposal 0601AS and
presents CASA’s evaluation of those comments.
This document also sets forth the amendments for
ADS–B equipage and related guidance material.
29 The FAA’s decision to propose performance
standards that meet TSO–166a is because the FAA
intends to use ADS–B transmissions to provide
surveillance using the existing separation standards
of 3 NM in terminal environments and 5 NM miles
in the enroute environment.
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
56963
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
the aircraft’s signal to multiple receivers
on the ground. At a minimum,
multilateration requires upwards of four
ground stations to deliver the same
volume of coverage and integrity of
information as ADS–B, due to the need
to ‘‘triangulate’’ the aircraft’s position.
While both radar and multilateration
meet today’s surveillance needs, it
would be substantially more costly to
expand these systems than to
implement ADS–B to meet future
surveillance demands. Moreover, future
uses of these systems would not provide
a platform for air-to-air applications, as
ADS–B does.
Radars have different update rates,
accuracies, ranges, and functions.
Alternatively, since ADS–B employs
one type of receiving equipment, it does
not have to accommodate for transition
between differing surveillance systems.
The consistency of the signal and
information could increase the
productivity of air traffic controllers by
eliminating the need to account for
different surveillance systems and
environments. The deployment of
secondary surveillance as a backup
would entail some of the costs, but these
would be significantly less than the
costs of a full NAS-wide secondary
surveillance solution.
IX. Rulemaking Notices and Analyses
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposal contains the following
new information collection
requirements. As required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3507(d)), the FAA has submitted
the information requirements associated
with this proposal to the Office of
Management and Budget for its review.
Title: Automatic Dependent
Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS–B) Out
performance requirements to support air
traffic control service.
Summary: This proposal requires
performance requirements for certain
avionics equipment on aircraft operating
in specified classes of airspace within
the United States National Airspace
System. The proposed rule would
facilitate the use of ADS–B for aircraft
surveillance by FAA air traffic
controllers to accommodate the
expected increase in demand for air
transportation. In addition to
accommodating the anticipated increase
in operations, this proposal, if adopted,
would provide aircraft operators with a
platform for additional flight
applications and services.
Use of: This proposal would support
the information needs of the FAA by
requiring avionics equipment that
continuously transmits aircraft
information to be received by the FAA,
via automation, for use in providing
surveillance services.
Respondents (including number of):
The likely respondents to this proposed
information requirement are stated in
the chart below.
Frequency: The FAA estimates that
each respondent would incur costs of
installing the equipment onboard the
aircraft, as provided below. The FAA
does not attribute any costs to each
individual transmission from the
electronics onboard the aircraft.
Attempts to capture each aircraft
transmission would be impossible and
even if it could be captured, the cost
would be minimal.
Annual Burden Estimate: This
proposal would result in unit aircraft
costs for new equipment installation
and associated labor as follows:
ADS–B EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION HOURS & COST & RESPONDENTS
Aircraft unit costs—includes equipment and installation costs
Aircraft group
Low
GA ................................................................
TurboProp ....................................................
TurboJet .......................................................
$4,328
12,906
3,862
High
$17,283
463,706
135,736
Installation costs by aircraft
Labor costs
Low
High
$2,250 .....
minimal ....
minimal ....
Number of
operators
Labor hours
Low
$5,000
23,000
23,000
30 ............
minimal ....
minimal ....
High
50
230
230
n/a
2,522
294
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
Note: ADS–B Equipment could be hardware, software or combination of both.
The agency is soliciting comments
to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of collecting
information on those who are to
respond, including by using appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Individuals and
organizations may send comments on
the information collection requirement
by January 3, 2008, and should direct
them to the address listed in the
ADDRESSES section at the end of this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
preamble. Comments also should be
faxed to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, (202) 395–
6974, Attention: Desk Officer for FAA.
According to the 1995 amendments to
the Paperwork Reduction Act (5 CFR
1320.8(b)(2)(vi)), an agency may not
collect or sponsor the collection of
information, nor may it impose an
information collection requirement
unless it displays a currently valid
OMB control number. The OMB control
number for this information collection
will be published in the Federal
Register after the Office of Management
and Budget approves it.
International Compatibility
In keeping with U.S. obligations
under the Convention on International
Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to
comply with ICAO SARPS to the
maximum extent practicable.
Considering that the long-term global
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
capabilities of ADS–B are not yet fully
defined, ICAO SARPS are still evolving
and are not yet fully developed.
However, the FAA researched existing
ICAO requirements for ADS–B Out
operations (using one of the ADS–B
links, either 1090ES or UAT) to the
maximum extent practicable.
Specifically, the FAA reviewed
applications to avionics and airframe
manufacturers, air carriers, and general
aviation operating under 14 CFR parts
91, 121, 125, or 135, and foreign air
carriers conducting operations in U.S.
airspace. The FAA has identified no
differences with these proposed
regulations.30
30 ICAO references: PANS–ATM, Doc 4444,
Amendment 4 (24/11/05), Procedures for Air
Navigation Services—Air Traffic Management; Doc
9694, ICAO Manual of Air Traffic Services Data
Link Applications; Annex 2, Rules of the Air;
Annex 4, Aeronautical Charts; Annex 6 Part II,
Operation of Aircraft; Annex 11, Air Traffic
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
Continued
05OCP1
56964
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Evaluation, Regulatory
Flexibility Determination, International
Trade Impact Assessment, and
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Changes to Federal regulations must
undergo several economic analyses.
First, Executive Order 12866 directs that
each Federal agency shall propose or
adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned
determination that the benefits of the
intended regulation justify its costs.
Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354) requires
agencies to analyze the economic
impact of regulatory changes on small
entities. Third, the Trade Agreements
Act (Pub. L. 96–39) prohibits agencies
from setting standards that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States. In
developing U.S. standards, this Trade
Act requires agencies to consider
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis of
U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4) requires agencies to prepare a
written assessment of the costs, benefits,
and other effects of proposed or final
rules that include a Federal mandate
likely to result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more annually (adjusted
for inflation with base year of 1995).
This portion of the preamble
summarizes the FAA’s analysis of the
economic impacts of this proposed rule.
We suggest readers seeking greater
detail read the full regulatory impact
analysis, a copy of which we have
placed in the docket for this rulemaking.
In conducting these analyses, FAA
has determined that this proposed rule:
(1) Has benefits that justify its costs, (2)
is an economically ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as defined in section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, (3) is
‘‘significant’’ as defined in DOT’s
Regulatory Policies and Procedures; (4)
would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities; (5) would not create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States; and (6)
would impose an unfunded mandate on
state, local, or tribal governments, or on
the private sector by exceeding the
Services; Annex 15, Aeronautical Information
Services; Doc 9689, Manual for determination of
separation minima; Circular 311, SASP Circular—
ADS–B Comparative Assessment; Circular 278,
National Plan for CNS/ATM Systems Guidance
Material; Annex 10 Vol. IV, Amendment 77,
Aeronautical Telecommunications; Doc 9871,
Technical Provisions for Mode S Services and
Extended Squitter (Approved draft to be published
in 2006); Doc 9688, ICAO Manual on Mode S
Specific Services.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
threshold identified above. These
analyses are summarized below.
Request for Comment
While we welcome and encourage, all
comments on the regulatory evaluation,
we specifically request comment in the
regulatory evaluation as follows:
• We solicit comments from
manufacturers of large category turbojet,
regional turboprop and general aviation
aircraft on when they intend to start
delivering new aircraft to comply with
the rule if enacted. We need
clarification of the avionics currently
installed on new production airplanes
and expected enhancements that would
occur without the rule. Lastly, we solicit
comment regarding the remaining
assumptions.
• We assumed the weight for an
ADS–B Out transponder, on a GA
aircraft, would be about the same as
weight as existing transponders and
therefore the change would be negligible
and there would be no additional
weight or fuel burn costs. We request
comments from industry on this
assumption.
• We request comments from
industry on the estimated costs,
maintenance intervals MTBF
replacement, and MTTR requirements
for the ADS–B Out transponder and
position source units.
• The FAA solicits comments on the
benefits that we have identified and
estimated and whether there are any
potential benefits of ADS–B that we
have not identified.
• We solicit comments from the
industry on what they expect avionics
costs of equipping with ADS–B In to be
as well as whether the industry will
voluntarily equip and the benefits of
ADS–B In equipage.
• We request comments from the
aviation industry about FAA
surveillance deployment strategies that
could permit acceleration of realized
benefits.
• The FAA seeks comment, with
supportive justification, to determine
the degree of hardship the proposed rule
will have on these small entities.
• Overall, in terms of competition,
this rulemaking reduces small operators
ability to compete. We request
comments from industry on the results
of the competitive analysis.
• The FAA assumed that
maintenance and replacement costs for
ADS–B Out for GA aircraft equals zero
because the maintenance and
replacement times would occur beyond
2035. The FAA seeks comment on this
assumption.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Total Benefits and Costs of this Rule
The demand for air travel is growing
in the U.S. and around the world. The
FAA’s forecasts project a doubling in
U.S. airline passenger traffic by 2025.
The forecasts also show strong growth
for general aviation, especially with the
advent of very light jets.
The solution to managing the
anticipated growth in the use of the
NAS is the Next Generation Air
Transportation System, or NextGen,
which will assure the safe and efficient
movement of people and goods as
demand increases. NextGen will use
technology to allow precise navigation,
permit accurate real-time
communication, and vastly improve
situational awareness.
ADS–B is the chosen new technology
for surveillance in the NextGen system.
It is a key component in achieving many
of the goals set forth in the Next
Generation Air Transportation System
(NextGen) Integrated Plan.
We review the following three
alternatives for surveillance in this
analysis:
1. Baseline radar—maintain the
current radar based surveillance system
and replace radar facilities when they
wear out;
2. ADS–B—Aircraft operators equip to
meet performance requirements
proposed by the rule and the FAA
provides surveillance services based on
downlinked aircraft information.
3. Multilateration—The FAA would
provide surveillance using
multilateration.
The proposed rule requires aircraft to
equip only with ADS–B Out when
flying in certain airspace. Operators may
choose to more fully equip with ADS–
B In and Out, and so we also address
these costs and benefits.
The estimated cost of this proposed
rule ranges from a low of $2.3 billion
($1.6 billion at 7% present value) to a
high of $8.5 billion dollars ($4.5 billion
at 7% present value).31 These costs
include costs to the government, as well
as to the aviation industry and other
users of the airspace, to deploy ADS–B
and are incremental to maintaining
surveillance via current technology
(radar). The aviation industry would
begin incurring costs for avionics
equipage in 2012 and would incur total
costs ranging from $1.27 billion ($670
million at 7% present value) 32 to $7.46
billion ($3.6 billion at 7% present
value) 33 with an estimated midpoint of
31 Costs at 3% present value range from $1.9
billion to $6.3 billion.
32 $950 million at 3% present value.
33 $5.35 billion at 3% present value.
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
$4.32 billion ($2.12 billion at 7%
present value) 34 from 2012 to 2035.
The estimated quantified potential
benefits of the proposed rule are about
$10 billion ($2.7 billion at 7% present
value) 35 and primarily result from fuel,
operating cost and time savings from
more efficient flights.
The proposed rule would make it
more likely that aircraft operators would
equip with ADS–B In equipment, which
could result in estimated additional
benefits of $3.9 billion ($1.0 billion at
7% present value).36 The additional cost
of the ADS–B In ground segment is
estimated at $533 million ($283 million
at 7% present value).37 We did not
estimate the cost for aircraft operators to
equip with ADS–B In because we
concluded the requirements for ADS–B
In are insufficient in detail and do not
yet support the development of a cost
estimate. The FAA will continue to
study ADS–B In technology and intends
to provide an adoption cost estimate for
the final rule. Benefits of both ADS–B In
and Out have been estimated at $13.8
billion ($3.7 billion at 7% present
value).38 Estimated costs of ADS–B In
and Out (excluding ADS–B In avionics
costs), relative to the radar baseline,
range from $2.8 billion ($1.8 at 7%
present value) 39 to $9.0 billion ($4.8 at
7% present value).40
While we do not have estimates of
ADS–B In avionics costs, we can derive
an upper bound for what that cost
cannot exceed if the ADS–B In and Out
scenario is to be cost beneficial relative
to radar for each of the two possibilities
described below.
Given that we have a range of costs
(low to high) we considered two
possibilities: (1) Low cost, and (2) high
cost:
• We concluded that ADS–B In and
Out would be cost beneficial at a
present value of 7% if the costs for the
ADS–B Out avionics are low ($670
million at 7% present value) and the
avionics costs for ADS–B In do not
exceed $1.85 billion at 7% present
value.
• We also concluded that ADS–B In
and Out would be cost beneficial at a
3% present value if the costs for the
ADS–B Out avionics are low ($950
million at 3% present value) and the
ADS–B In avionics costs do not exceed
$5.3 billion at 3% present value or if the
costs for the ADS–B Out avionics are
34 $3.13
billion at 3% present value.
billion at 3% present value.
36 $2.1 billion at 3% present value.
37 $392 million when discounted by 3%.
38 $7.6 billion at 3% present value.
39 $2.3 billion at 3% present value.
40 $6.7 billion at 3% present value.
35 $5.48
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
high ($5.35 billion at 3% present value)
and the ADS–B In avionics costs do not
exceed $870 million.
ADS–B is a critical component of the
Next Generation Air Transportation
System Plan (NextGen) that is being
developed to transform today’s radarbased aviation system to handle
increased aviation demand. By itself,
ADS–B presents significant benefits, but
as a component of the NextGen system
the benefits will substantially increase.
The Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis
has been placed in the docket for this
rulemaking.
Reduced Carbon Dioxide Emissions
Besides the cost savings made
possible by this proposed rulemaking,
there will also be potential
environmental benefits. ADS–B is an
enabling technology critical to the
concept of operations for the Next
Generation Air Transportation System
(NextGen) plan. Under the NextGen
operational concept there will be less
fuel used on many flights because of
fewer potential conflicts needing
resolution, more efficient en route
conflict resolution aircraft maneuvers,
and more efficient taxi and ground idle
operations. Additionally, having more
precise knowledge of the position of an
aircraft with ADS–B may assist the
implementation of such
environmentally friendly flight
procedures like continuous descent
arrivals (CDA) to be employed in higher
density traffic times.
The FAA estimates that between 2017
and 2035 ADS–B technology would
allow more efficient handling of
potential en route conflicts, which will
result in a total of 410 million gallons
of fuel savings in the national airspace
system over that time period. This
decrease in fuel use would result in
about 4 million metric tons less carbon
dioxide emissions.41 The increased use
of continuous descent approaches that
ADS–B would allow would lead to
about 10 billion pounds of total fuel
savings from 2017 through 2035. This
would result in about 14 million tons
less carbon dioxide emissions.
Additionally, the FAA has estimated a
decline in fuel use on airline flights over
the Gulf of Mexico due to optimal
routing because of this proposed
rulemaking. This savings in fuel use
would result in an additional
cumulative decrease of 300,000 metric
41 For more information on the methodology used
to calculate this estimate, see ‘‘ADS–B Benefits
Enabled from Improved en Route Conflict Probe
Performance’’ in the docket established for this
rulemaking. The specific data in this regulatory
evaluation however, is more conservation than the
data in the report just mentioned.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56965
tons of carbon dioxide emissions over
the 2012 to 2035 time period.
Reduced fuel consumption will also
translate into fewer emissions such as
oxides of nitrogen, which potentially
impact, both local air quality and
climate (as a greenhouse gas emission),
as well as hydrocarbons and carbon
monoxide-both of which impact local
air quality. Reduction in local air
quality impacts associated with
increasing capacity is vital in
maintaining compliance with national
ambient air quality standards.
The FAA solicits comments on the
benefits that we have identified and
estimated and whether there are any
potential benefits of ADS–B that we
have not identified.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Determination ADS–B
Introduction and Purpose of This
Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(Pub. L. 96–354) (RFA) establishes ‘‘as a
principle of regulatory issuance that
agencies shall endeavor, consistent with
the objectives of the rule and of
applicable statutes, to fit regulatory and
informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and
governmental jurisdictions subject to
regulation. To achieve this principle,
agencies are required to solicit and
consider flexible regulatory proposals
and to explain the rationale for their
actions to assure that such proposals are
given serious consideration.’’ The RFA
covers a wide-range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-forprofit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to
determine whether a rule will have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. If
the agency determines that it will, the
agency must prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis as described in the
RFA.
However, if an agency determines that
a proposed or final rule is not expected
to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities, section 605(b) of the 1980 RFA
provides that the head of the agency
may so certify and a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required. The
certification must include a statement
providing the factual basis for this
determination, and the reasoning should
be clear.
The FAA believes that this proposal
would result in a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The purpose of this analysis is
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
56966
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
to provide the reasoning underlying the
FAA determination.
Under Section 603(b) of the RFA, the
analysis must address:
• Description of reasons the agency is
considering the action,
• Statement of the legal basis and
objectives for the proposed rule,
• Description of the record keeping
and other compliance requirements of
the proposed rule,
• All federal rules that may duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with the proposed
rule,
• Description and an estimated
number of small entities to which the
proposed rule will apply,
• Analysis of small firms’ ability to
afford the proposed rule,
• Estimation of the potential for
business closures,
• Conduct a competitive analysis,
• Conduct a disproportionality
analysis, and
• Describe the alternatives
considered.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
Reasons Why the Rule Is Being
Proposed
Public Law 108–176, referred to as
‘‘The Century of Aviation
Reauthorization Act,’’ was enacted
December 12, 2003 (Pub. L. 108–176).
This law set forth requirements and
objectives for transforming the air
transportation system to progress further
into the 21st century. Section 709 of this
statute requires the Secretary of
Transportation to establish in the FAA
a joint planning and development office
(JPDO) to manage work related to the
Next Generation Air Transportation
System (NextGen). Among its statutorily
defined responsibilities, the JPDO
coordinates the development and
utilization of new technologies to
ensure that when available, they may be
used to the fullest potential in aircraft
and in the air traffic control system.
The FAA, the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration (NASA) and
the Departments of Commerce, Defense,
and Homeland Security have launched
an effort to align their resources to
develop and further the NextGen. The
goals of NextGen, as stated in section
709, are addressed by this proposal and
include:
(1) Improve the level of safety,
security, efficiency, quality, and
affordability of the NAS and aviation
services;
(2) take advantage of data from
emerging ground-based and space-based
communications, navigation, and
surveillance technologies;
(3) be scalable to accommodate and
encourage substantial growth in
domestic and international
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
transportation and anticipating and
accommodating continuing technology
upgrades and advances; and
(4) accommodate a wide range of
aircraft operations, including airlines,
air taxis, helicopters, general aviation,
and unmanned aerial vehicles.
The JPDO was also charged to create
and carry out an integrated plan for
NextGen. The NextGen Integrated
Plan,42 transmitted to Congress on
December 12, 2004, ensures that the
NextGen system meets the air
transportation safety, security, mobility,
efficiency and capacity needs beyond
those currently included in the FAA’s
Operational Evolution Plan (OEP). As
described in the NextGen Integrated
Plan, the current approach to air
transportation, i.e., ground based radars
tracking congested flyways and passing
information among the control centers
for the duration of the flights, is
becoming operationally obsolete. The
current system is increasingly
inefficient and large increases in air
traffic will only result in mounting
delays or limitations in service for many
areas.
This growth will result in more air
traffic than the present system can
handle. The current method of handling
traffic flow will not be able to adapt to
the highest volume and density of it in
the future. It is not only the number of
flights but also the nature of the new
growth that is problematic, as the future
of aviation will be much more diverse
than it is today. For example, a shift of
2 percent of today’s commercial
passengers to micro-jets that seat 4–6
passengers would result in triple the
number of flights in order to carry the
same number of passengers.
Furthermore, the challenges grow as
other non-conventional aircraft, such as
unmanned aircraft, are developed for
special operations, e.g. forest fire
fighting.
The FAA believes that ADS–B
technology is a key component in
achieving many of the goals set forth in
the plan. This proposed rule embraces
a new approach to surveillance that can
lead to greater and more efficient
utilization of airspace. The NextGen
Integrated Plan articulates several large
transformation strategies in its roadmap
to successfully creating the Next
Generation System. This proposal is a
major step toward strategically
‘‘establishing an agile air traffic system
that accommodates future requirements
and readily responds to shifts in
demand from all users.’’ ADS–B
technology would assist in the
42 A copy of the Plan has been placed in the
docket for this rulemaking.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
transition to a system with less
dependence on ground infrastructure
and facilities, and provide for more
efficient use of airspace.
Statement of the Legal Basis and
Objectives
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103, Sovereignty and use of airspace,
and Subpart III, section 44701, General
requirements. Under section 40103, the
FAA is charged with prescribing
regulations on the flight of aircraft,
including regulations on safe altitudes,
navigating, protecting, and identifying
aircraft, and the safe and efficient use of
the navigable airspace. Under section
44701, the FAA is charged with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce.
This proposal is within the scope of
sections 40103 and 44701 since it
proposes aircraft performance
requirements that would meet advanced
surveillance needs to accommodate the
projected increase in operations within
the National Airspace System (NAS). As
more aircraft operate within the U.S.
airspace, improved surveillance
performance is necessary to continue to
balance the growth in air transportation
with the agency’s mandate for a safe and
efficient air transportation system.
Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping and
Other Requirements
We expect no more than minimal new
reporting and recordkeeping compliance
requirements to result from this
proposed rule. Costs for the initial
installation of new equipment and
associated labor constitute a burden
under the Paperwork Reduction Act and
are accounted for in this document.
Overlapping, Duplicative, or Conflicting
Federal Rules
We are unaware that the proposed
rule will overlap, duplicate or conflict
with existing Federal Rules.
Estimated Number of Small Firms
Potentially Impacted
Under the RFA, the FAA must
determine whether a proposed rule
significantly affects a substantial
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
number of small entities. This
determination is typically based on
small entity size and cost thresholds
that vary depending on the affected
industry. Using the size standards from
the Small Business Administration for
Air Transportation and Aircraft
Manufacturing, we defined companies
as small entities if they have fewer than
1,500 employees.43
We considered the economic impact
on small-business part 91, 121, and 135
operators. Many of the General Aviation
(GA) aircraft are operating in part 91 are
not for hire or flown for profit so we
will not include these operators in our
small business impact analysis.
This proposed rule would become
final in 2009 and fully effective in 2020.
Although the FAA forecasts traffic and
air carrier fleets to 2030, our forecasts
do not have the granularity to determine
if an operator will still be in business or
will still remain a small business entity.
Therefore we will use current U.S.
operator’s fleet and employment in
order to determine the number of
operators this proposal would affect.
We obtained a list of part 91, 121 and
135 U.S. operators from the FAA Flight
Standards Service.44 Using information
provided by the U.S. Department of
Transportation Form 41 filings, World
Aviation Directory and ReferenceUSA,
operators that are subsidiary businesses
of larger businesses and businesses with
more than 1,500 employees were
eliminated from the list of small
entities. In many cases the employment
and annual revenue data was not public
and we did not include these companies
in our analysis. For the remaining
businesses, we obtained company
revenue and employment from the
above three sources.
The methodology discussed above
resulted in the following list of 34 U.S.
part 91, 121 and 135 operators, with less
than 1,500 employees, who operate 341
airplanes. Due to the sparse amount of
publicly available data on internal
company financial statistics for small
entities, it is not feasible to estimate the
total population of small entities
affected by this proposed rule. These 34
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
43 13 CFR part 121.201, Size Standards Used to
Define Small Business Concerns, Sector 48–49
Transportation, Subsector 481 Air Transportation.
44 AFS–260.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
U.S. small entity operators are a
representative sample to assess the cost
impact of the total population of small
businesses, who operate aircraft affected
by this proposed rulemaking.
Operator name
Number
of aircraft
Air 1ST Aviation Companies of
Oklahoma, Inc ...........................
Air Flight Enterprises Inc ..............
Air Transport International ............
Aircraft Charter Services Inc ........
Allegiant Air ..................................
American Check Transport Inc .....
Anaconda Aviation Corp ...............
Arrow Services .............................
Bankair Inc ....................................
Caribbean Sun Airlines .................
Champion Air ................................
Copper Station Holdings, LLC ......
EPPS Air Service, Inc ..................
ERA Aviation Inc ..........................
Executive Airlines .........................
Falcon Air Express .......................
GOJET Airlines .............................
Lynden Air Cargo .........................
Miami Air International ..................
Midwest Airlines ............................
North American Airlines ................
Northeast Aviation, Inc .................
Northern Air Cargo .......................
Omni Air International ...................
Pace Airlines .................................
Premier Jets Inc ...........................
Professional Aviation Services .....
Royal Air Freight, Inc ....................
Ryan International Airlines ...........
Samaritan’s Purse ........................
Sun Country Airlines .....................
USA Jet Airlines ...........................
World Airways ...............................
XTRA Airways ..............................
9
2
12
2
26
11
2
2
10
6
16
1
11
9
38
4
15
6
11
36
9
1
10
16
8
1
4
3
12
2
13
10
17
6
Total .......................................
341
Cost and Affordability for Small Entities
To assess the cost impact to small
business part 91, 121 and 135 operators,
we contacted manufacturers, industry
associations, and ADS–B equipage
providers to estimate ADS–B equipage
costs. We requested estimates of
airborne installation costs, by aircraft
model, for the output parameters listed
in the Equipment Specifications section
of the Regulatory Evaluation.
This proposed rule would become
final in 2009 and fully effective in 2020.
Although the FAA forecast traffic and
air carrier fleets to 2030, our forecasts
do not have the granularity to determine
if an operator will still be in business or
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56967
will still remain a small business entity.
Therefore we will use current U.S.
operator’s revenues and apply the
industry-provided costs in order to
determine if this proposal would have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entity operators.
To satisfy the manufacturer’s request
to keep individual aircraft pricing
confidential, we calculated a low,
baseline, and high range of costs by
equipment class. The baseline estimate
equals the average of the low and high
industry estimates. The dollar value
ranges consist of a wide variety of
avionics within each aircraft group. The
aircraft architecture within each
equipment group can vary, causing
different carriage, labor and wiring
requirements for the installation of
ADS–B. Volume discounting versus
single line purchasing also affects the
dollar value ranges. On the low end, the
dollar value may represent a software
upgrade or OEM option change. On the
high end, the dollar value may represent
a new installation of upgraded
transponder systems necessary to assure
accuracy, reliability and safety. We used
the estimated baseline dollar value cost
by equipment class in determining the
impact to small business entities.
We estimated each operator’s total
compliance cost by multiplying the
baseline dollar value cost, by equipment
class, by the number of aircraft each
small business operator currently has in
its fleet. We summed these costs by
equipment class and group. We then
measured the economic impact on small
entities by dividing the estimated
baseline dollar value compliance cost
for their fleet by the small entity’s
annual revenue. Each equipment group
operated by a small entity may have to
comply with different requirements in
the proposed rule depending on the
state the aircraft’s avionics. In the ADS–
B Out Equipage Cost Estimate section of
the Regulatory Evaluation we detail our
methodology to estimate operator’s total
compliance cost by equipment group.
As shown in the following table, the
ADS–B cost is estimated to be greater
than two percent of annual revenues for
12 small entity operators and greater
than one percent of annual revenues for
19 small entity operators.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
56968
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4910–13–C
Business Closure Analysis
Thus, from this sample population,
the FAA determined that a substantial
number of small entities would be
significantly affected by the proposed
rule. Every small entity who operates an
aircraft in the airspace defined by this
proposal would be required to install
ADS–B out equipage and therefore
would be affected by this rulemaking.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
For commercial operators, the ratio of
present-value costs to annual revenue
shows that 7 of 34 small business air
operator firms analyzed would have
rations in excess of five percent. Since
many of the other commercial small
business air operator firms do not make
their annual revenue publicly available,
it is difficult to assess the financial
impact of this proposed rule on their
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
business. To fully assess whether this
proposed rule could force a small entity
into bankruptcy requires more financial
information than is publicly available.
The FAA seeks comment, with
supportive justification, to determine
the degree of hardship, and feasible
alternative methods of compliance, the
proposed rule will have on these small
entities.
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
EP05OC07.008
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
The aviation industry is an extremely
competitive industry with slim profit
margins. The number of operators who
entered the industry and have stopped
operations because of mergers,
In this competitive industry, cost
increases imposed by this proposed
regulation would be hard to recover by
raising prices, especially by those
operators showing an average five-year
negative operating profit. Further, large
operators may be able to negotiate better
pricing from outside firms for
inspections and repairs, so small
operators may need to raise their prices
more than large operators. These factors
make it difficult for the small operators
to recover their compliance costs by
raising prices. If small operators cannot
recover all the additional costs imposed
by this regulation, market shares could
shift to the large operators.
Small operators successfully compete
in the aviation industry by providing
unique services and controlling costs.
To the extent the affected small entities
operate in niche markets enhances small
entity’s ability to pass on costs.
Currently small operators are much
more profitable than the established
major scheduled carriers. This proposed
rule would offset some of the
advantages of older aircraft lower
capital cost.
Overall, in terms of competition, this
rulemaking reduces small operators
ability to compete. We request
comments from industry on the results
of the competitive analysis.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
acquisitions, or bankruptcy litters the
history of the aviation industry.
The FAA analyzed five years of
operating profits for the affected smallentity operators listed above. We were
able to determine the operating profit
for 18 of the 34 small business entities.
The FAA discovered that 33% of these
18 affected operator’s average operating
profit is negative. Only four of the 18
affected operators had average annual
operating profit that exceeded
$10,000,000. These results are shown in
the following table.
Disproportionality Analysis
The disproportionately higher impact
of the proposed rule on the fleets of
small operators result in
disproportionately higher costs to small
operators. Due to the potential of fleet
discounts, large operators may be able to
negotiate better pricing from outside
sources for inspections, installation, and
ADS–B hardware purchases. Based on
the percent of potentially affected
current airplanes over the analysis
period, small U.S. business operators
may bear a disproportionate impact
from the proposed rule.
Comments received and final rule
changes on regulatory flexibility issues
will be addressed in the statement of
considerations for the final rule.
Alternative Two
Analysis of Alternatives
Alternative One
The status quo alternative has
compliance costs to continue the
operation and commissioning of radar
sites. The FAA rejected this status quo
alternative because the ground based
radars tracking congested flyways and
passing information among the control
centers for the duration of the flights is
becoming operationally obsolete. The
current system is not efficient enough to
accommodate the estimated increases in
air traffic, which would result in
mounting delays or limitations in
service for many areas.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
This alternative would employ a
technology called multilateration.
Multilateration is a separate type of
secondary surveillance system that is
not radar and has limited deployment in
the U.S. At a minimum, multilateration
requires upwards of four ground
stations to deliver the same volume of
coverage and integrity of information as
ADS–B, due to the need to ‘‘triangulate’’
the aircraft’s position. Multilateration is
a process wherein an aircraft position is
determined using the difference in time
of arrival of a signal from an aircraft at
a series of receivers on the ground.
Multilateration meets the need for
accurate surveillance and is less costly
than ADS–B (but more costly than
radar), but cannot achieve the same
level of benefits that ADS–B can.
Multilateration would provide the same
benefits as radar, but at a higher cost.
Alternative Three
This alternative would provide relief
by having the FAA provide an
exemption to small air carriers from all
requirements of this rule. This
alternative would mean that the small
air carriers would rely on the status quo
ground based radars tracking their
flights and passing information among
the control centers for the duration of
the flights. This alternative would
require compliance costs to continue for
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
EP05OC07.009
Competitive Analysis
56969
56970
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
the commissioning of radar sites. Air
traffic controller workload and training
costs would increase having to employ
two systems in tracking aircraft. Small
entities may request ATC deviations
prior to operating in the airspace
affected by this proposal. It would also
be contrary to our policy for one level
of safety in part 121 operations to
exclude certain operators simply
because they are small entities. Thus,
this alternative is not considered to be
acceptable.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
Alternative Four
This alternative is the proposed ADS–
B rule. ADS–B does not employ
different classes of receiving equipment
or provide different information based
on its location. Therefore, controllers
will not have to account for transitions
between surveillance solutions as an
aircraft moves closer or farther away
from an airport. In order to meet future
demand for air travel without significant
delays or denial of service, ADS–B was
found to be the most cost effective
solution to maintain a viable air
transportation system. ADS–B provides
a wider range of services to aircraft
users and could enable applications
unavailable to multilateration or radar.
Trade Impact Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(Pub. L. 96–39) prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing any
standards or engaging in related
activities that create unnecessary
obstacles to the foreign commerce of the
United States. Legitimate domestic
objectives, such as safety, are not
considered unnecessary obstacles. The
statute also requires consideration of
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for
U.S. standards.
ICAO is developing a set of standards
that are influenced by, and similar to,
the U.S. RTCA developed standards.
Initial discussions with the
international community lead us to
conclude that U.S. aircraft operating in
foreign airspace would not have to add
any equipment or incur any costs in
addition to what they would incur to
operate in domestic airspace under this
proposed rulemaking. Foreign operators
may incur additional costs to operate in
U.S. airspace, if their national rules,
standards and, current level of equipage
are different than those required by this
proposed rule. The FAA is actively
engaged with the international
community to ensure that the
international and US. ADS–B standards
are as compatible as possible. For a
fuller discussion of what other countries
are planning with regard to ADS–B, see
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
Section VII of this preamble. By 2020
ICAO standards may change to
harmonize with this proposed rule and
foreign operators will not have to incur
additional costs.
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4)
requires each Federal agency to prepare
a written statement assessing the effects
of any Federal mandate in a proposed or
final agency rule that may result in an
expenditure of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation with the
base year 1995) in any one year by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector; such
a mandate is deemed to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action.’’ The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of
$128.1 million in lieu of $100 million.
This proposed rule is not expected to
impose significant costs on small
governmental jurisdictions such as state,
local, or tribal governments, but the
FAA calls for comment on whether this
expectation is correct. However, this
proposed rule would result in an
unfunded mandate because it would
result in expenditures in excess of an
inflation-adjusted value of $128.1
million. We have considered three
alternatives to this rulemaking, which
are discussed in section 4.0 and in the
regulatory flexibility analysis in section
7.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The FAA has analyzed this proposed
rule under the principles and criteria of
Executive Order 13132, Federalism. We
determined that this action would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, and therefore
would not have federalism implications.
Environmental Analysis
FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA
actions that are categorically excluded
from preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act in the
absence of extraordinary circumstances.
The FAA has determined this proposed
rulemaking action qualifies for the
categorical exclusion identified in
paragraph 312f and involves no
extraordinary circumstances.
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
The FAA has analyzed this NPRM
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). We
have determined that it is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under the
executive order because it is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866, and it is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 91
Aircraft, Airmen, Air traffic control,
Aviation safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend chapter I of title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 91—GENERAL OPERATING AND
FLIGHT RULES
1. The authority citation for part 91
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 1155, 40103,
40113, 40120, 44101, 44111, 44701, 44709,
44711, 44712, 44715, 44716, 44717, 44722,
46306, 46315, 46316, 46504, 46506–46507,
47122, 47508, 47528–47531, articles 12 and
29 of the Convention on International Civil
Aviation (61 stat.1180).
2. Amend § 91.1 by revising paragraph
(b) to read as follows:
§ 91.1
Applicability.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Each person operating an aircraft
in the airspace overlying the waters
between 3 and 12 nautical miles from
the coast of the United States must
comply with §§ 91.1 through 91.21;
§§ 91.101 through 91.143; §§ 91.151
through 91.159; §§ 91.167 through
91.193; § 91.203; § 91.205; §§ 91.209
through 91.217; § 91.221, § 91.225;
§§ 91.303 through 91.319; §§ 91.323
through 91.327; § 91.605; § 91.609;
§§ 91.703 through 91.715; and § 91.903.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Revise § 91.217 to read as follows:
§ 91.217 Data correspondence between
automatically reported pressure altitude
data and the pilot’s altitude reference.
(a) No person may operate any
automatic pressure altitude reporting
equipment associated with a radar
beacon transponder—
(1) When deactivation of that
equipment is directed by ATC;
(2) Unless, as installed, that
equipment was tested and calibrated to
transmit altitude data corresponding
within 125 feet (on a 95 percent
probability basis) of the indicated or
calibrated datum of the altimeter
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
normally used to maintain flight
altitude, with that altimeter referenced
to 29.92 inches of mercury for altitudes
from sea level to the maximum
operating altitude of the aircraft; or
(3) Unless the altimeters and
digitizers in that equipment meet the
standards of TSO–C10b and TSO–C88,
respectively.
(b) After January 1, 2020, no person
may operate any automatic pressure
altitude reporting equipment associated
with a radar beacon transponder or with
ADS–B Out equipment unless the
pressure altitude reported for ADS–B
Out and Mode C/S is derived from the
same source for aircraft equipped with
both a transponder and ADS–B Out.
4. Add § 91.225 to read as follows:
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
§ 91.225 Automatic Dependent
Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS–B) Out
equipment and use.
(a) After January 1, 2020, and unless
otherwise authorized by ATC, no person
may operate an aircraft below Flight
Level 240 (FL240) and in airspace
described in paragraph (b) of this
section unless the aircraft is equipped
with ADS–B Out equipment that:
(1) Meets the performance
requirements in TSO–C166a (1090ES),
or later version; or
(2) Meets TSO–C154b (UAT), or later
version; and
(3) Meets the requirements in part 91,
Appendix H;
(b) Airspace:
(1) Class A airspace below FL240;
(2) Class B and Class C airspace areas;
(3) All aircraft in all airspace within
30 nautical miles of an airport listed in
appendix D, section 1 of this part from
the surface upward to 10,000 feet MSL;
(4) All aircraft in all airspace above
the ceiling and within the lateral
boundaries of a Class B or Class C
airspace area designated for an airport
upward to 10,000 feet MSL.
(c) After January 1, 2020, and unless
otherwise authorized by ATC, no person
may operate an aircraft at or above
FL240 unless the aircraft is equipped
with ADS–B Out equipment that:
(1) Meets the performance
requirements in TSO–C166a or later
version; and
(2) Meets the requirements of part 91,
Appendix H.
(d) The requirements of paragraphs (a)
and (c) of this section, as appropriate,
apply to:
(1) All aircraft in Class E airspace over
the Gulf of Mexico from the coastline of
the United States out to 12 nautical
miles at and above 3,000 feet MSL;
(2) All aircraft, except for any aircraft
that was not originally certificated with
an electrical system, or which has not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
subsequently been certified with such a
system installed, including balloons and
gliders, in Class E airspace within the 48
contiguous states and the District of
Columbia at and above 10,000 feet MSL.
(e) The requirements of paragraphs
(a), (c), and (d) of this section do not
apply to any aircraft that was not
originally certificated with an electrical
system, or which has not subsequently
been certified with such a system
installed, including balloons and
gliders, which may conduct operations
without ADS–B Out in airspace within
30 nautical miles of an airport listed in
appendix D, section 1 of this part
provided such operations are
conducted:
(1) Outside any Class B or Class C
airspace area; and
(2) Below the altitude of the ceiling of
a Class B or Class C airspace area
designated for an airport, or 10,000 feet
MSL, whichever is lower.
(f) Each person operating an aircraft
equipped with ADS–B Out must operate
this equipment in the transmit mode at
all times except as otherwise directed by
ATC.
(g) Requests for ATC authorized
deviations must be made to the ATC
facility having jurisdiction over the
concerned airspace within the time
periods specified as follows:
(1) For operation of an aircraft with an
inoperative ADS–B Out, to the airport of
ultimate destination, including any
intermediate stops, or to proceed to a
place where suitable repairs can be
made or both, the request may be made
at any time.
(2) For operation of an aircraft that is
not equipped with ADS–B Out, the
request must be made at least one hour
before the proposed operation.
5. Amend appendix D to part 91 by
revising section 1 introductory text to
read as follows:
Appendix D to Part 91—Airports/
Locations: Special Operating
Restrictions
Section 1. Locations at which the
requirements of § 91.215(b)(2) and
§ 91.225(b)(3) apply. The requirements of
§ 91.215(b)(2) and § 91.225(b)(3) apply below
10,000 feet above the surface within a 30nautical-mile radius of each location in the
following list:
*
*
*
*
*
6. Add appendix H to part 91 to read
as follows;
Appendix H—Performance
Requirements for Automatic Dependent
Surveillance—Broadcast (Ads–B) Out
Section 1. Terms of Reference
ADS–B Out is a function of an aircraft’s
onboard avionics that periodically broadcasts
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4700
56971
the aircraft’s state vector (3-dimensional
position and 3-dimensional velocity) and
other required information as described in
this appendix.
ADS–B Out operating requirements are
defined in 14 CFR 91.225.
Navigation Accuracy Category for Position
(NACp) specifies the accuracy of reported
aircraft’s position as defined in TSO–C166a
and TSO–C154b.
Navigation Accuracy Category for Velocity
(NACv) specifies the accuracy of reported
aircraft’s velocity as defined in TSO–C166a
and TSO–C154b.
Navigation Integrity Category (NIC)
specifies an integrity containment region
around the aircraft’s reported position, as
defined in TSO–C166a and TSO–C154b.
Navigation Position Sensor is the
equipment installed onboard an aircraft used
to process and transmit aircraft position (e.g.
location, latitude and longitude, state vector)
information.
Surveillance Integrity Level (SIL) indicates
the potential risk that the reported aircraft’s
position is outside the integrity containment
region described by the NIC parameter, as
defined in TSO–C166a and TSO–C154b.
Section 2. 1090ES and UAT Broadcast Links
and Power Requirements
(a) Aircraft operating above FL240 with
equipment installed that meets the minimum
performance requirements of TSO–C166a or
later version, must meet the performance
requirements of Class A1, A2, A3, or B1
equipment as defined in TSO–C166a or later
version.
(b) Aircraft operating in airspace
designated for ADS–B Out and below FL240
must have equipment installed that meets the
performance requirements of either:
(1) Class A1, A2, A3 or B1 equipment as
defined in TSO–C166a or later version; or
(2) Class A1H, A2, A3, or B1 equipment as
defined in TSO–C154b or later version.
Section 3. ADS–B Out Performance
Requirements for NIC, NAC, and SIL
(a) For aircraft broadcasting ADS–B Out as
required under § 91.225(a), (c), and (d):
(1) The aircraft’s NACp for the positioning
source must be greater than or equal to 9;
(2) The aircraft’s NACv for the positioning
source must be greater than or equal to 1;
(3) The aircraft’s NIC must be greater than
or equal to 7; and
(4) The aircraft’s SIL must be 2 or 3.
(b) Changes in the NIC, NAC, or SIL must
be broadcast within 10 seconds.
Section 4. Minimum Broadcast Message
Element Set for ADS–B Out
Each aircraft must broadcast the following
information, as defined in TSO–C166a or
later version, or TSO–C154b or later version.
The pilot must enter information for message
elements (g)–(k) of this section during the
appropriate phase of flight:
(a) The length and width of the aircraft;
(b) An indication of the aircraft’s lateral
and longitudinal position;
(c) An indication of the aircraft’s
barometric pressure altitude;
(d) An indication of the aircraft’s velocity;
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
56972
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 193 / Friday, October 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(e) An indication if TCAS II or ACAS is
installed and operating in a mode that can
generate resolution advisory alerts;
(f) If an operable TCAS II or ACAS is
installed, an indication if a resolution
advisory is in effect;
(g) An indication if the flight crew has
selected to receive ATC services;
(h) An indication of the Mode 3/A
transponder code specified by ATC;
(i) An indication of the aircraft’s call sign
that is submitted on the flight plan, or the
aircraft’s registration number;
(j) An indication if the flight crew has
identified an emergency and if so, the
emergency status being transmitted;
(k) An indication of the aircraft’s ‘‘IDENT’’
to ATC;
(l) An indication of the aircraft assigned
ICAO 24-bit address;
(m) An indication of the aircraft’s emitter
category;
(n) An indication whether a cockpit
display of traffic information (CDTI) is
installed and operable; and
(o) An indication of the aircraft’s geometric
altitude.
Section 5. ADS–B Latency Requirements
(a) Upon receipt of the information by the
aircraft antenna(s), the navigation position
sensor must process the information in less
than 0.5 seconds.
(b) The processed information from the
navigation position sensor must be
transmitted in the ADS–B Out message in
less than 1.0 second.
(c) The aircraft must transmit its position
and velocity at least once per second while
airborne or while moving on the airport
surface.
(d) The aircraft must transmit its position
at least once every 5 seconds while stationary
on the airport surface.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 1,
2007.
Michael A. Cirillo,
Vice President, System Operations Services.
Rick Day,
Vice President, En Route and Oceanic
Services.
in the vicinity of Hopewell, VA centered
on position 37–19.18′ N/077–16.93′ W
(NAD 1983) in support of the Christmas
Holiday Boat Parade and Fireworks
Event. This action is intended to restrict
vessel traffic on the Appomattox River
as necessary to protect mariners from
the hazards associated with fireworks
displays.
Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
November 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander,
Sector Hampton Roads, Norfolk Federal
Building, 200 Granby St., 7th Floor,
Attn: Lieutenant Junior Grade TaQuitia
Winn, Norfolk, VA 23510. Sector
Hampton Roads maintains the public
docket for this rulemaking. Comments
and material received from the public,
as well as documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, will become part of this docket
and will be available for inspection or
copying at the Norfolk Federal Building
between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Junior Grade TaQuitia Winn,
Assistant Chief, Waterways
Management Division, Sector Hampton
Roads at (757) 668–5580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Request for Comments
33 CFR Part 165
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking, CGD05–07–092, and
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
[CCGD05–07–092]
Public Meeting
RIN 1625–AA00
We do not plan to hold a public
meeting, but you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to the
Commander, Sector Hampton Roads at
the address under ADDRESSES explaining
why one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
[FR Doc. 07–4938 Filed 10–2–07; 9:08 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
Coast Guard
Safety Zone: Christmas Holiday Boat
Parade and Fireworks, Appomattox
River, Hopewell, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a 600 foot radius safety zone
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Oct 04, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Background and Purpose
On December 1, 2007, the Christmas
Holiday Boat Parade and Fireworks
event will be held on the Appomattox
River in Hopewell, VA. Due to the need
to protect mariners and spectators from
the hazards associated with the
fireworks display, vessel traffic will be
temporarily restricted within 600 feet of
the display.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
a 600 foot radius safety zone on
specified waters of the Appomattox
River in the vicinity of Hopewell, VA
centered on position 37–19.18′ N/077–
16.93′ W (NAD 1983). This regulated
area will be established in the interest
of public safety during the Christmas
Holiday Boat Parade and Fireworks
event and will be enforced from 6 p.m.
on December 1, 2007 to 8 p.m. on
December 2, 2007. General navigation in
the safety zone will be restricted during
the event. Except for participants and
vessels authorized by the Captain of the
Port or his designated Coast Guard
Representative on scene, no person or
vessel may enter or remain in the
regulated area.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary. Although this
proposed regulation would restrict
access to the regulated area, the effect of
this rule will not be significant because:
(i) The safety zone will be in effect for
a limited duration of time; and, (ii) the
Coast Guard will provide notifications
via maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM
05OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 193 (Friday, October 5, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56947-56972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4938]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 91
[Docket No. FAA-2007-29305; Notice No. 07-15]
RIN 2120-AI92
Automatic Dependent Surveillance--Broadcast (ADS-B) Out
Performance Requirements To Support Air Traffic Control (ATC) Service
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice proposes performance requirements for certain
avionics equipment on aircraft operating in specified classes of
airspace within the United States National Airspace System. The
proposed rule would facilitate the use of Automatic Dependent
Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) for aircraft surveillance by Federal
Aviation Administration and Department of Defense air traffic
controllers to accommodate the expected increase in demand for air
transportation. In addition to accommodating the anticipated increase
in operations, this proposal, if adopted, would provide aircraft
operators with a platform for additional flight applications and
services.
DATES: Send your comments on or before January 3, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2007-
29305 using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building Ground
[[Page 56948]]
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Bring comments to the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor
at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at
202-493-2251.
Privacy Act: We will post all comments we receive, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit https://
DocketInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov at any time and follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket. Or, go to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vincent Capezzuto, Surveillance and
Broadcast Services Office, Air Traffic Organization, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone 202-385-8288.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking proposal by submitting written comments, data, or views. We
also invite comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy,
or federalism impacts that might result from adopting the proposals in
this document. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion
of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, include
specific rule language changes, and include supporting data. We ask
that you send us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
Before acting on this proposal, we will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for comments. We will consider
comments filed after the comment period has closed if it is possible to
do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change this proposal
in light of the comments we receive.
If you want the FAA to acknowledge receipt of your comments on this
proposal, include with your comments a pre-addressed, stamped postcard
on which the docket number appears. We will stamp the date on the
postcard and mail it to you.
Proprietary or Confidential Business Information
Do not file in the docket information that you consider to be
proprietary or confidential business information. Send or deliver this
information directly to the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. You must mark the
information that you consider proprietary or confidential. If you send
the information on a disk or CD-ROM, mark the outside of the disk or
CD-ROM and also identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is proprietary or confidential.
Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), when we are aware of proprietary information
filed with a comment, we do not place it in the docket. We hold it in a
separate file to which the public does not have access, and place a
note in the docket that we have received it. If we receive a request to
examine or copy this information, we treat it as any other request
under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). We process such a
request under the DOT procedures found in 49 CFR part 7.
Availability of Rulemaking Documents
You can get an electronic copy of rulemaking documents using the
Internet by--
1. Searching the Federal eRulemaking Portal (https://
www.regulations.gov);
2. Visiting the FAA's Regulations and Policies Web page at https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/; or
3. Accessing the Government Printing Office's Web page at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
You can also get a copy by sending a request to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202) 267-9680. Make
sure to identify the docket number, notice number, or amendment number
of this rulemaking.
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103, Sovereignty and use of
airspace, and Subpart III, section 44701, General requirements. Under
section 40103, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations on the
flight of aircraft, including regulations on safe altitudes,
navigating, protecting, and identifying aircraft, and the safe and
efficient use of the navigable airspace. Under section 44701, the FAA
is charged with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce
by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the
Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce.
This proposal is within the scope of sections 40103 and 44701 since
it proposes aircraft performance requirements that would meet advanced
surveillance needs to accommodate the projected increase in operations
within the National Airspace System (NAS). As more aircraft operate
within the U.S. airspace, improved surveillance performance is
necessary to continue to balance the growth in air transportation with
the agency's mandate for a safe and efficient air transportation
system.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Vision of the Future
B. The Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act and NextGen
C. Today's Radar Environment
II. The ADS-B System
A. General
B. Ground Infrastructure
III. Summary of the Proposal
IV. The Proposal for ADS-B Out
A. Advantages of ADS-B Out
B. Avionics
1. 1090ES and UAT Broadcast Links
2. Broadcast Link Requirements for Different Flight Levels
3. Part 91 Appendix H Message Elements
4. Navigation Position Sensor and the Accuracy and Integrity of
the ADS-B Message
5. ADS-B Antenna Diversity and Transmit Power Requirements
6. Latency of the ADS-B Out Broadcast Message Elements
7. Maintenance
C. Operational Procedures
1. Applicability
2. Airspace
3. Pilot Procedures
4. Backup Surveillance Strategy
[[Page 56949]]
5. Compliance Schedule for ADS-B Out Requirements
V. ADS-B In
A. Avionics
B. Applications and Services
VI. FAA Experience with ADS-B
A. Capstone
B. Gulf of Mexico
C. UPS--Louisville
D. Surveillance in Non-Radar Airspace
VII. ADS-B in Other Countries
VIII. Alternatives to ADS-B
IX. Rulemaking Notices and Analyses
I. Background
A. Vision of the Future
The demand for air travel is growing in the U.S. and around the
world. The FAA's forecasts project a doubling in U.S. airline passenger
traffic by 2025. The forecasts also show strong growth for general
aviation, especially with the advent of very light jets. By the end of
this decade as many as 400-500 of these small jets could join the fleet
each year. With the new small jets and other growth, the active general
aviation fleet is projected to grow from 230,000 aircraft today to
275,000 aircraft in 2020.
That is the demand from piloted aircraft. The development and use
of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) is one of the next big steps forward
in aviation's evolution. The FAA is working across government and
industry to ensure the safe authorization of these aircraft to fly in
civil airspace.
The good news is U.S. air travel and related use of the National
Airspace System (NAS) will grow. That growth will bring challenges
since the present U.S. air traffic system--the world's largest and
safest--is not designed to absorb this level of growth. Today's system
is limited by outmoded technology--such as the constraints ground-based
radar places on the distance aircraft must be separated and the limits
caused by having to transmit information by voice between aircraft and
the ground.
The solution to managing the anticipated growth in the use of the
NAS is the Next Generation Air Transportation System, or NextGen, which
will assure the safe and efficient movement of people and goods as
demand increases. NextGen will use technology to allow precise
navigation, permit accurate real-time communication, and vastly improve
situational awareness. The goal: A system flexible enough to
accommodate safely whatever number, type and mix of aircraft there will
be in U.S. skies by 2025.
NextGen will be an aircraft-centric system with performance-based
requirements. The future system will describe performance for
navigation, communications, and surveillance.
For navigation, the aviation community is already seeing the
benefits of performance-based navigation with the use of Required
Navigation Performance (RNP) as well as Area Navigation (RNAV)
procedures at many U.S. airports. RNP and RNAV are examples of
procedures that use improved navigational accuracy as compared to
traditional procedures. The new procedures are being implemented
consistent with the ``Roadmap for Performance-Based Navigation.'' The
benefit of performance-based navigation: Enabling aircraft to fly
precisely defined flight paths with unprecedented accuracy.
For communication, NextGen will be built on a more comprehensive
and capable information network than has been previously available. It
will ensure the right information gets to the right person at the right
time. With performance-based navigation and internet-like access to
critical information--including nearly real-time weather--pilots will
be able to make precision landings at airports that have no control
towers, radar, or Instrument Landing Systems. Attaining the goal of
performance-based communications will depend on technology, such as
datalink, which would transmit key instructions directly to aircraft
flight management systems, which would speed receipt of critical
information and prevent errors that can come from manual data entry.
The third element--performance-based surveillance--relies on
technology that permits knowing the exact location of other aircraft in
the air and of other aircraft and ground vehicles on the airport
surface. The aviation community's experience with ADS-B, which
periodically broadcasts an aircraft's location--both horizontal and
vertical position and horizontal and vertical velocity--will lead
directly to the performance requirements. When displayed in the
cockpit, information obtained through ADS-B greatly improves
situational awareness in the en route segment, in the terminal area
during approaches, and on the airport surface. For additional
information on ADS-B activities, see Section VI, FAA Experience with
ADS-B later in the preamble.
This rulemaking is important because ADS-B is an essential NextGen
building block. Improving surveillance requires advanced onboard
equipment with backup capability. Most, if not all, of the surveillance
capability as well as the navigation and communications capabilities
should be onboard the aircraft so the required capabilities will go
wherever the aircraft goes. As part of the rulemaking effort, the FAA
established an Aviation Rulemaking Committee under Order 1110.147. This
committee has been chartered to deliver a report on how to optimize
operational benefits of the ADS-B system and to provide recommendations
to the FAA on the rulemaking after the NPRM is published. The scope of
the ARC membership is designed to provide the widest range of inputs
into the development of the NextGen strategy. The FAA will put the ARC
recommendations in the docket established for this rulemaking.
It is this combination of onboard capability and performance
expectations that will enable aircraft in the future to fly safely and
efficiently despite ever-increasing demands on the airspace.
B. The Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act and NextGen
The ``Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act'' was enacted on
December 12, 2003 (Pub. L. 108-176) (the ``Act''). This law set forth
requirements and objectives for transforming the U.S. air
transportation system to meet the needs of the 21st Century. Section
709 of the Act required the Secretary of Transportation to establish in
the FAA a joint planning and development office (JPDO) to manage work
related to NextGen. Among its statutorily defined responsibilities, the
JPDO coordinates the development and utilization of new technologies to
ensure that when available, they may be used to the fullest potential
in aircraft and in the air traffic control system.
The FAA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
and the Departments of Commerce, Defense, and Homeland Security have
launched an effort to align their resources to develop and further
evolve NextGen. The goals of NextGen, as stated in the Act, that are
addressed by this proposal are:
(1) Improve the level of safety, security, efficiency, quality, and
affordability of the NAS and aviation services;
(2) Take advantage of data from emerging ground-based and space-
based communications, navigation, and surveillance technologies;
(3) Be scalable to accommodate and encourage substantial growth in
domestic and international transportation and anticipate and
accommodate continuing technology upgrades and advances; and
(4) Accommodate a wide range of aircraft operations, including
airlines,
[[Page 56950]]
air taxis, helicopters, general aviation, and UAS.
The JPDO was also charged with creating and carrying out an
integrated plan for NextGen. The Act mandates that the NextGen
Integrated Plan (the ``Plan'') be designed to ensure that the NextGen
system meets the air transportation safety, security, mobility,
efficiency, and capacity needs beyond those currently included in the
FAA's Operational Evolution Plan.\1\ As described in the Plan \2\, the
current approach to air transportation, where ground based radars track
flights along congested airways, and pass information among the control
centers for the duration of the flights, is becoming operationally
obsolete. The current system is increasingly inefficient, and large
increases in air traffic will result in mounting delays or limitations
in service for many areas in the NAS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Plan was submitted to Congress on December 12, 2004.
\2\ A copy of the Plan has been placed in the docket for this
rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As detailed in the Plan, the demand for air travel is expected to
double within the next 20 years. Current FAA projections are that by
2025, operations will grow to more than half a million departures and
arrivals per year at approximately 16 additional airports. The present
air traffic control system will be unable to handle this level of
growth. Not only will the current method of handling traffic flow not
be able to adapt to the highest volume and density for future
operations, but the nature of the new growth may be problematic, as
future aviation activity will be much more diverse than it is today. A
shift of 2 percent of today's commercial passengers to very light jets
that seat 4-6 passengers would result in triple the number of flights
necessary to carry the same number of passengers.\3\ Furthermore, the
challenges grow with the advent of other non-conventional aircraft,
such as the UAS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Very light jets may revolutionize the industry by permitting
more individuals and corporations to own aircraft. It addition, many
airports that are too small for large jet operations should benefit
because they can support very light jets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The future of air transportation contemplated in the Plan is
complex, and the FAA believes that ADS-B technology is a key component
in achieving many of the goals set forth in the Plan. This proposed
rule embraces a new approach to surveillance performance requirements
that can lead to greater and more efficient use of airspace. The Plan
articulates several large transformation strategies to create the
NextGen System. This proposal is a major step toward strategically
``establishing an agile air traffic system that accommodates future
requirements and readily responds to shifts in demand from all users.''
ADS-B technology will assist in the transition to a system with less
dependence on ground infrastructure and facilities, and would provide
for more efficient use of airspace.
C. Today's Radar Environment
In the U.S., Air Traffic Control (ATC) surveillance and aircraft
separation services are provided by the use of primary and secondary
surveillance radar systems. While radar technology has advanced, it is
essentially a product of 1940s World War II technology. Both primary
and secondary radars are very large structures that are expensive to
deploy and maintain; they also require the agency to lease land for
site installation.
Primary radar is a passive detection method that requires no
special equipment aboard the aircraft. It is a technology that
transmits a beam that is reflected by a target. This reflection forms a
return signal that is translated into an aircraft position by ATC
automation systems. Primary radar, however, is not always able to
distinguish aircraft from other objects that reflect radar beams, such
as birds or severe weather, which can result in ``clutter'' on the ATC
radar scope. In addition, with primary radar, ATC is provided only with
an aircraft's position relative to time. It does not provide any other
information about the aircraft.
Primary radar measures both the range and bearing of a particular
aircraft. Bearing is measured by the position of the rotating radar
antenna when it receives a response to its signal that is reflected
from the aircraft. Range is measured by the time it takes for the radar
to receive the reflected response. Detecting changes in an aircraft's
velocity requires several radar sweeps that are spaced several seconds
apart. Because the antenna beam becomes wider as the aircraft travels
farther away from the radar, the accuracy of the radar is a function of
range, and the accuracy decreases as the distance between the aircraft
and the radar site increases. Consequently, aircraft on the outer
fringes of radar coverage or in non-radar areas are separated by
greater distances, directly affecting efficiency and ultimately
capacity in the NAS.
A Secondary Surveillance Radar (SSR) system consists of antennas,
transmitters, and processors installed in ATC facilities, and radio
transponder devices that are installed in aircraft. This system
enhances primary radar by improving the ability to detect and identify
aircraft. An SSR transmits interrogation pulses that elicit responses
from transponders on board the aircraft. A transponder installed on the
aircraft ``listens'' for the interrogation signal and sends back a
reply that provides aircraft information. The aircraft is then
displayed as a tagged icon on the air traffic controller's radar
screen.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ An aircraft without an operating transponder may still be
observed by ATC using primary radar, but the aircraft will not have
an identifying tag.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each transponder category has unique characteristics, operating
functions, and requirements. A transponder with Mode A functionality
requires the pilot to input a discrete code. If the same transponder is
connected with an encoding device then it will also report the
aircraft's altitude (Mode C). Most aircraft operated in general
aviation have Mode A/C transponders. Any aircraft required to have
Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) II, or that
voluntarily has TCAS II installed must also be equipped with a Mode S
Transponder. (This generally includes aircraft operated under parts
121, 125, 129 and some aircraft operated under part 135.) Mode S
transponders transmit both aircraft altitude and aircraft
identification information. Both Mode A/C transponders and Mode S
transponders require interrogation to provide information.
To accommodate the projected level of traffic without increasing
delay, more comprehensive surveillance in the NAS, including more radar
sites in certain areas, would be necessary. Even if more radar sites
were commissioned, however, there are many areas in which radar
coverage is not feasible, either geographically (e.g., mountainous
areas) or in a cost-effective manner (e.g., remote areas). Furthermore,
simply increasing the number of radars in the NAS does not solve the
inherent limitation of radar technology, and would not allow the FAA to
reduce current separation standards.\5\ Consequently, the future of air
traffic surveillance cannot be based solely on the use of radar. Radar
technology also lacks the capability to provide services on the flight
deck. However, the FAA is planning to maintain its current network of
primary radars, and expects to be able to reduce a percentage of its
secondary radars. This NPRM does not propose to reduce primary radar
sites.\6\
[[Page 56951]]
Instead, this NPRM would transfer future aircraft surveillance to newer
and more advanced onboard avionics that provide more accurate and
timely aircraft information. ADS-B has been identified as the
technology to facilitate that goal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The FAA currently separates aircraft by 5 NM in the en route
environment and 3 NM in the terminal environment.
\6\ While the FAA expects to be able to reduce a significant
percentage of the national secondary surveillance radar
infrastructure, primary radars will not be decommissioned as a
function of this proposal. Primary radar will serve a role in
surveillance during the transition period of ADS-B avionics
equipage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. The ADS-B System
A. General
The ADS-B system is an advanced surveillance technology that
combines a satellite positioning service, aircraft avionics, and ground
infrastructure to enable more accurate transmission of information
between aircraft and ATC. The system enables equipped aircraft to
continually broadcast information, such as identification, current
position, altitude, and velocity. ADS-B uses information from a
position service, e.g. Global Positioning System (GPS), to broadcast
the aircraft's location, thereby making this information more timely
and accurate than the information provided by the conventional radar
system (which has a latency factor since it is based on interrogation
and reply). ADS-B also can provide the platform for aircraft to receive
various types of information, including ADS-B transmissions from other
equipped aircraft or vehicles. ADS-B is automatic because no external
interrogation is required, but is ``dependent'' because it relies on
onboard position sources and onboard broadcast transmission systems to
provide surveillance information to ATC and ultimately to other users.
Implementation of an ADS-B system would not completely replace the
primary radar or SSR at this time. In addition, ADS-B does not replace
the requirement for transponders. Transponders are still necessary for
SSR, which is the FAA's backup strategy in case of ADS-B failure. For
more information on the backup strategy, see section IV.C.4, Backup
Surveillance Strategy.
The performance requirements for ADS-B avionics proposed in this
NPRM would ensure that the aircraft is broadcasting the requisite
information with the degree of accuracy and integrity necessary for ATC
to use that information for surveillance.\7\ This enhanced surveillance
would provide ATC with the enhanced ability to surveil and separate
aircraft so that efficiency and capacity could increase beyond current
levels to meet the predicted demand for ATC services while continually
maintaining safety. Incremental developments in capacity, efficiency,
and air traffic control procedures based on radar technology cannot
accommodate the anticipated increase in demand for surveillance and
separation services, which could result in delays that would far exceed
those experienced today. Without ADS-B, the increase in demand could
result in increased congestion and the denial of ATC service to some
users of the NAS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ An aircraft equipped for ADS-B Out would transmit the
aircraft's position, velocity and other specified, proposed message
elements once per second. Radar data, on the other hand, is
generated approximately once every 3-12 seconds for display to the
air traffic controller depending on whether the aircraft is in the
en route or terminal environment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADS-B technology already has been demonstrated successfully in
Alaska via the Capstone program.\8\ In Alaska, radar coverage is either
very limited or non-existent. ADS-B provides a level of surveillance
performance that previously did not exist and has resulted in increases
in both efficiency and capacity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For additional information on Capstone, see Section VI.
later in the preamble. It should be noted that Special Federal
Aviation Regulation No. 97, Special Operating Rules for the Conduct
of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) Area Navigation (RNAV) Operations
Using Global Positioning Systems (GPS) in Alaska (68 FR 14072; March
21, 2003), would remain in effect to supplement the requirements in
this proposal as it applies to Alaska.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
``ADS-B Out'' refers to an appropriately equipped aircraft's
broadcasting of various aircraft information. ``ADS-B In'' refers to an
appropriately equipped aircraft's ability to receive another aircraft's
ADS-B Out information. This proposal only seeks to require ADS-B Out;
the FAA is not proposing to require ADS-B In at this time.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Sections IV. later in the preamble for a detailed
discussion of ADS-B Out and V. for a detailed discussion of ADS-B
In.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Ground Infrastructure
Implementing ADS-B in the NAS to provide surveillance requires
avionics, ground infrastructure, automation, and data. This NPRM
addresses the performance requirements for the avionics and the
necessary data that must be broadcast from the aircraft in order for
ATC to use that information for surveillance and separation. The ground
infrastructure involves the installation of a multitude of ground
stations throughout the NAS that first receive the ADS-B Out
transmissions from an aircraft, then relay real-time information based
on those transmissions to ATC facilities. The exact number of ground
stations needed to provide broadcast services across the NAS will be
negotiated as part of the national broadcast service contract. The
preliminary estimate approved by the FAA's Joint Resource Council call
for 548 ground stations to provide coverage NAS-wide and in the Gulf of
Mexico.
On August 30, 2007, the FAA awarded a performance-based service
contract to a consortium led by ITT Corporation. The contract is to
provide ADS-B surveillance uplink (ground-to-air) and downlink (air-to-
ground) services and Automatic Dependent Surveillance Rebroadcast (ADS-
R), Traffic Information Services--Broadcast (TIS-B) \10\, and Flight
Information Services--Broadcast (FIS-B) \11\ services. The vendor will
install and maintain the ground equipment necessary to provide ADS-B
uplink and downlink services to ATC. On November, 30, 2006, the FAA
issued a Screening Information Request to determine which vendors
understand the contract requirements well enough to proceed in the
acquisition process. The FAA's schedule for ADS-B Out calls for all
ground infrastructure, including the provision of broadcast services,
to be in place and available where current surveillance exists by the
end of fiscal year 2013. This schedule will provide reasonably ample
time for operators to equip their aircraft for ADS-B Out and meet the
proposed compliance date of 2020 in this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Traffic Information Services--Broadcast (TIS-B) is a
ground-based uplink report to a pilot of proximate traffic that is
under surveillance by ATC but is not ADS-B-equipped. This service
would be available even with limited ADS-B implementation. The
combinations of the surveillance and TIS-B services can enable
pilots to have enhanced visual acquisition of other aircraft. Having
traffic and other flight obstacles on a cockpit display will enable
pilots to more quickly identify safety hazards and communicate with
ATC if necessary. Aircraft that are equipped with ADS-B can be
monitored through a direct reception of their ADS-B signals in an
air-to-air environment.
\11\ Flight Information Services--Broadcast (FIS-B) is a ground-
based uplink of flight information services and weather data. Other
flight information provided by the FIS-B service includes Notices to
Airmen and Temporary Flight Restrictions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Summary of the Proposal
The FAA is proposing ADS-B Out performance requirements for all
aircraft operations in Class A, B, and C airspace areas in the NAS, and
Class E airspace areas at or above 10,000 feet mean sea level (MSL)
over the 48 contiguous United States and the District of Columbia. This
proposal also would require that aircraft meet these performance
requirements in the airspace out to 30 nautical miles (NM), from the
surface up to 10,000 MSL, around certain identified airports that are
among the nation's busiest. In addition, this proposal if adopted would
require that aircraft meet ADS-B Out performance requirements to
operate in
[[Page 56952]]
Class E airspace over the Gulf of Mexico from the coastline of the
United States out to 12 nautical miles (NM), at and above 3,000 feet
MSL.
The FAA proposes to require aircraft flying at or above Flight
Level 240 (FL240) to have ADS-B Out performance capabilities using the
1090 Extended Squitter (1090ES) broadcast link. Aircraft flying in the
designated airspace below FL 240 would have to use either the 1090ES or
Universal Access Transceiver (UAT) broadcast link. These proposals
would affect all U.S. commercial air carrier operations, foreign-flag
carriers operating in the designated classes of U.S. airspace, air
charter operations, air cargo operations, and a significant portion of
the general aviation fleet operating in the NAS.
The implementation of ADS-B requires two datalinks to support the
full set of applications. UAT is intended to support applications for
the general aviation user community that are not needed by air carriers
because air carriers have weather radar, fly at high altitudes, and
have other aeronautical links. UAT-equipped general aviation aircraft
are not generally equipped with weather radar and would be flying at
low altitudes. The 1090ES link is the internationally agreed upon link
for ADS-B, and is intended to support applications for air carriers and
other high-performance aircraft. The 1090ES broadcast link does not
support applications available from FIS-B, like weather and related
flight information. This is because of the bandwidth limitations of the
1090ES link for transmitting the large message structures required by
FIS-B. Weather and flight information for 1090ES-equipped aircraft is
generally provided by commercial products.
As described in the Plan, large increases in air traffic would
result in mounting delays or limitations in service for many areas if
the current surveillance system is not modified. An environment in
which aircraft meet the proposed ADS-B Out performance requirements
would result in greater capacity and efficiency in the NAS, maintain
safety, and provide a flexible, expandable platform to accommodate
future traffic growth while avoiding possible system delays and
limitations in service.
In moving forward with a performance-based surveillance system, the
FAA believes that communication with the affected industry is critical.
The FAA hosted several Industry Days to brief the technology, the
rulemaking and procurement processes and associated milestones to
interested parties, including manufacturers and affected operators. As
with any rulemaking, the FAA invites comments on the various elements
of this proposal, and all comments will be carefully considered. If
this proposal is adopted as a final rule, it may be modified in view of
the submitted comments.
IV. The Proposal for ADS-B Out
A. Advantages of ADS-B Out
ADS-B Out, as proposed in this notice, would enhance surveillance
and broadcast services in both the en route and terminal environments
and provide ATC with more accurate information to safely separate
aircraft in the air.
In today's radar surveillance environment, accuracy and integrity
of radar information is a function of range and decreases as the
distance between the radar antenna and the aircraft increases. Unlike
radar, both the accuracy and integrity of ADS-B Out is uniform and
consistent throughout the service area. A comprehensive, national
surveillance system that utilizes ADS-B Out would provide ATC with the
ability to accurately identify and locate aircraft that are either far
away from the ATC facilities or at the outer boundaries of ground
station service volume.
If ATC had more precise aircraft position information, it could
position, separate, and provide speed and direction instructions to
aircraft with improved precision and timing. This would result in the
use of optimal flight paths and altitudes. This transmission of
information would enable improvement of airspace capacity throughout
the NAS. Additionally, with ADS-B Out, ATC would receive updated
information broadcast by aircraft more frequently than with radar, and
would be able to track a more closely monitored flight path. This would
result in ATC providing fewer instructions to pilots, thus having more
time to accommodate additional aircraft within the allotted airspace.
These improved efficiencies for ATC ultimately should accommodate the
increased number of aircraft able to operate in the NAS. In addition,
we expect a reduction in aircraft fuel burn because better surveillance
provides for more efficient use of the airspace, provides for optimal
aircraft routing, and addresses the limits currently experienced with
radar.
In the terminal radar environment today, ATC may have to request
pilots to provide aircraft speed, heading, and in some cases, aircraft
identification. Neither the primary radar nor SSR systems provide all
that information. With ADS-B, ATC is automatically provided aircraft
speed, heading, and other identifying information, including aircraft
size, which are necessary to safely position and separate aircraft more
rapidly than is possible today.
While more precise ADS-B derived aircraft position information
improves ATC efficiencies under current separation standards, the
potential for significantly greater capacity and efficiency gains may
be realized by reducing separation standards between aircraft.
Therefore, this rulemaking is expected to help achieve a level of
surveillance accuracy that would support reducing aircraft separation
standards. ADS-B is an essential component of the NextGen platform and
is necessary to achieve a level of capacity in the NAS commensurate
with future growth.
B. Avionics
This discussion first addresses the broadcast message links
necessary to transmit aircraft information to the ground stations and
the specific message elements that would be broadcast by the aircraft
comprising the ADS-B Out transmission. Next we discuss the navigation
position sensor and the necessary accuracy and integrity of the ADS-B
message. Finally, we explain the necessary requirements for antenna
diversity on the aircraft, and the required latency of the data in the
ADS-B transmission from the aircraft.
1. 1090ES and UAT Broadcast Links
In 2002, the United States determined that two frequencies would be
appropriate for ADS-B: 1090MHz and 978MHz. To broadcast the necessary
data elements for ADS-B Out transmission under this proposal, aircraft
would have to be equipped with either 1090ES or UAT that meet the
latest version of either Technical Standard Order (TSO)-C166a or TSO-
C154b, respectively.\12\ Today, operators of air carriers and many
private/commercial aircraft already are primarily equipped with
avionics designed under TSO-C112, Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon
System/Mode Select (ATCRBS/Mode S), which are required to function with
the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System
[[Page 56953]]
(TCAS II) or ACAS.\13\ Many TSO-C112 Mode S Transponders can be
modified or are designed to provide 1090ES functionality under TSO-
C166a. Most other general aviation aircraft, typically small aircraft
operated in non-commercial service (that are not required to have TCAS
II), would likely use the UAT broadcast link for ADS-B Out, which
operates on the 978MHz frequency. Today, a small number of aircraft are
equipped with UAT ADS-B In and are capable of receiving TIS-B and FIS-B
services. While the 1090ES link does not support FIS-B, it does support
TIS-B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ A TSO is a minimum performance standard issued by the
Administrator for specified materials, parts, processes, and
appliances used on civil aircraft. TSO-C166a sets the minimum
performance standards for Extended Squitter Automatic Dependent
Surveillance--Broadcast (ADS-B) and Traffic Information Service
Broadcast (TIS-B) Equipment Operating on the Radio Frequency of 1090
MHz. TSO-C154b sets the minimum performance standard for Universal
Access Transceiver (UAT) Automatic Dependent Surveillance--
Broadcast (ADS-B) Equipment.
\13\ Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS) is comparable to
TCAS II and is specified for use in Europe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In December 2006, RTCA \14\ published RTCA/DO-260A, Change 2,
``Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) for 1090 MHz
Automatic Dependent Surveillance--Broadcast (ADS-B).'' This change
revised RTCA/DO-260 1090ES MOPS. The major differences between RTCA/DO-
260 and RTCA/ DO-260A are refinements of the Navigation Integrity
Category (NIC), Navigation Accuracy Category (NAC), and Surveillance
Integrity Level (SIL) parameters, which significantly improve the
overall performance and interoperability of the ADS-B Out broadcast
link. These modified parameters (NIC, NAC, and SIL) provide a level of
accuracy and integrity with respect to the information transmitted in
the ADS-B Out message that would enable ATC to provide improved
surveillance and separation services based on the information it
receives from the aircraft.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ RTCA, Incorporated is a not-for-profit corporation formed
to advance the art and science of aviation and aviation electronic
systems for the benefit of the public. The organization functions as
a Federal Advisory Committee and develops consensus-based
recommendations on contemporary aviation issues. The organization's
recommendations are often used as the basis for government and
private sector decisions as well as the foundation for many TSOs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After RTCA issued its updates in December 2006, the FAA
subsequently issued TSO-C166a, which adopted the recent modifications
specified in change 2 to RTCA/DO-260A, and characterizes the parameters
of NIC, NAC, and SIL.\15\ There are some aircraft equipped today with
legacy 1090ES ADS-B systems. Operators of these aircraft would need to
modify their broadcast link equipment to meet the proposed requirements
defined in TSO-C166a. This modification could include hardware,
software, or both depending upon other avionics installed on the
aircraft.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ TSO-C166a superseded TSO-C166.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The transition to TSO-C166a and TSO-C154b has been identified as a
requirement for use of ADS-B in the required airspace. The United
States faces unique challenges in air traffic control due to its high
density airspace and stringent safety requirements. In order to
maintain safety and capacity, given a state of increased air traffic,
advanced surveillance technologies will be necessary. The earlier
standards in RTCA/DO-260 do not provide the performance standards
necessary to meet the requirements of the NAS. RTCA/DO-260a provides a
means to transmit the Secondary Surveillance Radar beacon codes that
currently service the NAS and will continue to be required as a backup
to ADS-B. RTCA/DO-260 does not provide that compatibility.
The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) is in the
process of updating the 1090ES Standards and Recommended Practices
(SARPs) published in ICAO Annex 10, Amendment 77, to include those
requirements identified in the publication of RTCA/DO-260A, Change 2.
These updated SARPs are expected to become effective in November 2007.
Operators may, under this proposal, also choose to equip with dual
link avionics, i.e. 1090ES and UAT, which would provide the capability
to transmit and receive information on both broadcast links at the same
time.
If an aircraft is to operate at or above FL240, which is discussed
further in section IV.b.3. of this preamble (``Broadcast Link
Requirements for Different Flight Levels''), the aircraft's broadcast
link capabilities would have to meet the minimum performance
requirements of TSO-C166a, (i.e., be equipped with 1090ES).
Consequently, those aircraft operating at or above FL240 with Mode A/C
transponders would need new transponders. Aircraft with Mode S
transponders without compatible extended squitter capability installed
would need to be reequipped with those providing 1090ES functionality,
or supplement them with 1090ES to operate at or above FL240.
In December 2006, RTCA also issued RTCA/DO-282A, Change 1 for UAT,
which clarified the definitions of the NIC, NAC, and SIL similar to
those specified for 1090ES discussed above. TSO-C154b adopted the
requirements of RTCA/DO-282A and clarifies performance parameters
capable of ensuring interoperability with ground stations deployed to
support the Capstone program in Alaska, and to provide for future NAS
interoperability assurances. Aircraft equipped with UAT must meet the
minimum performance standards in TSO-C154b, or later version. There are
very few aircraft equipped with legacy UAT equipment. Operators of
those aircraft would need to modify their equipment to meet the
performance standards of TSO-C154b.
2. Broadcast Link Requirements for Different Flight Levels
The FAA proposes to require that aircraft flying at or above FL240
have ADS-B Out performance capability using the 1090ES broadcast link.
For operations below FL240, operators could equip their aircraft with
either the 1090ES or UAT broadcast links. Some general aviation
aircraft are already equipped with the UAT broadcast link, and most
general aviation operators are expected to equip with UAT under this
proposal in order to have TIS-B and FIS-B services. Larger aircraft,
particularly the transport category aircraft, generally operate at
higher altitudes and are already equipped with 1090ES that meets TSO-
C166 (which would require modification to upgrade to TSO-C166a under
this proposal) or have equipment installed that uses the 1090 broadcast
link. Furthermore, the international aviation communities, and for the
most part, foreign-flag aircraft operating in the U.S., tend to operate
large transport category aircraft that also operate at the higher
altitudes. Having a single broadcast link at higher altitudes would
enable aircraft equipped for ADS-B In to benefit from potential future
applications such as aircraft merging and spacing, and self-separation.
These applications are enabled by having aircraft identify each other
on the same data link without the need to employ ADS-R, which would
increase the latency of the transmission. The FAA believes that the
approach articulated in the proposal to require 1090ES for operations
at and above FL240 is largely consistent with how those affected
operators would choose their respective broadcast link. While this NPRM
does not require equipage for ADS-B In, we fully recognize that
operators may choose to equip for that capability and that it is
reasonable to lay the foundation so that operators may be able to take
advantage of future applications if they so choose.
3. Part 91 Appendix H--Broadcast Message Elements
The FAA is proposing to add an appendix to 14 CFR part 91 to
specify the broadcast message elements necessary for ADS-B Out. These
message elements contain the data necessary for ATC to support aircraft
[[Page 56954]]
surveillance by ADS-B. The message elements required support future
NextGen air-to-air applications such as reduced horizontal separation
and self separation. These message elements also support the capability
for aircraft avionics to be verified during normal operations for
continuing airworthiness in lieu of conducting ground checks of the
avionics. We believe the message elements allow for further NextGen
capabilities, at least to the extent we can predict those future needs
at this time. However, in the future, additional elements such as
predictive aircraft movement could be added to enable further
capabilities.
These elements would be broadcast automatically from the aircraft
except where pilot entry is necessary. Pilot entry would be necessary
for elements (g) through (k). The following is a description of each
message element.
(a) The length and width of the aircraft. This message element
would provide ATC with quick reference to the aircraft's dimensions. On
airport surfaces in particular, aircraft are in close proximity to each
other and this information would facilitate ATC's ability to use the
most appropriate landing and surface movement procedures for individual
aircraft in managing traffic on the airport surfaces. This information
would be pre-set when avionics equipment meeting the standards in TSO-
C166a or TSO-C154b, as applicable, is installed on the aircraft.
(b) An indication of the aircraft's lateral and longitudinal
position. This message element is derived from the aircraft's
navigation position sensor \16\ and would provide an accurate position
based on latitude, longitude, and accuracy values for the display of
information in a format that meets ATC requirements. This information
is critical to the safe and efficient separation of aircraft.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The aircraft's navigation position sensor is discussed in
detail in section IV.4. of this preamble.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) An indication of the aircraft's barometric pressure altitude.
This message element would provide ATC with the aircraft's altitude
information. Currently, Sec. 91.217 requires Mode C and Mode S
transponders to transmit pressure altitude. It is critical that the
altitude transmitted by the Mode C and Mode S transponders is identical
to that in the ADS-B transmission. Therefore, in addition to this
proposed data element, we believe that Sec. 91.217 should be amended
as well. Section 91.217 requires Mode C and Mode S transponders to
transmit pressure altitude. We propose to revise Sec. 91.217 to also
apply to the ADS-B transmission of altitude to ensure that the reported
altitude from various avionics is consistent.
(d) An indication of the aircraft's velocity. This message element
is also derived from the aircraft's navigation position sensor and
would provide ATC with the aircraft's airspeed with a clearly stated
direction and describes the rate at which an aircraft changes its
position.
(e) An indication if TCAS II or ACAS is installed and operating in
a mode that may generate resolution advisory alerts. This information
would identify to ATC whether an aircraft is equipped with TCAS II or a
later version or its European equivalent ACAS, and whether that
equipment is operating in a mode that may generate resolution advisory
alerts.
(f) For aircraft with an operable TCAS II or ACAS, an indication if
a resolution advisory is in progress. Both TCAS II and ACAS improve
safety by detecting impending airborne collisions or incursions and
issuing commands to the pilot on how to avoid the hazard by climbing or
descending. If two aircraft get too close to each other, the aircrafts'
TCAS II or ACAS systems will provide a resolution advisory (RA), which
gives the pilots a command to climb or descend to avoid the other
aircraft. The RA command is provided independent of ATC instructions.
It is critical for ATC to know why an aircraft is climbing or
descending, i.e., responding to an RA, ATC instruction, or a previous
flight plan path. ATC may respond more efficiently and safely in
managing the air traffic environment by knowing whether an aircraft is
responding to an RA.
(g) An indication if ATC services are requested. (Requires flight
crew entry.) This message element would identify to air traffic
controllers if services are requested and whether the aircraft is in
fact receiving ATC services.
(h) An indication of the Mode 3/A transponder code specified by
ATC. (Requires flight crew entry.) All transponder-equipped aircraft on
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) flights are directed by ATC to ``squawk''
a unique four-digit code, commonly referred to as a ``Mode 3/A
transponder code.'' All transponder equipped aircraft on Visual Flight
Rules (VFR) flights are directed by ATC to squawk 1200. The assigned
Mode 3/A transponder code is used by ATC to identify each aircraft
operating under IFR, and the 1200 transponder code identifies aircraft
operating under VFR.
An aircraft equipped with ADS-B Out continually broadcasts its
state vector (3-dimensional position and 3-dimensional velocity). It is
critical for ATC to correlate and verify that the ADS-B Out information
transmitted from each aircraft is displayed and identified correctly on
the ATC radar display. Therefore, it is imperative that the ATC-
assigned transponder code be identical to the assigned transponder code
in the ADS-B Out message. If the aircraft's avionics are not capable of
allowing a single point of entry for the transponder and ADS-B Out Mode
3A code, the pilot would have to ensure that conflicting codes are not
transmitted to ATC. Operational procedures would have to be developed,
including specific guidance, instructions, or training material
provided by the equipment manufacturer, as well as the operator
training programs, manuals, Operations Specifications, and Letters of
Authorization, to ensure that conflicting codes are not transmitted to
ATC.
(i) An indication of the aircraft's call sign that is submitted on
the flight plan, or the aircraft's registration number. (Aircraft call
sign requires flight crew entry.) This message element would correlate
flight plan information with the data that ATC views on the radar
display and facilitate ATC communication with the aircraft. The
aircraft's call sign or registration number broadcast in the ADS-B
message would have to be identical to information contained in its
flight plan.
(j) An indication if the flight crew has identified an emergency,
and if so, the emergency status being transmitted. (Requires flight
crew entry.) This message element would alert ATC that the aircraft is
experiencing emergency conditions and indicate the type of emergency.
Applicable emergency codes would be found in the Aeronautical
Information Manual. This information would alert ATC to potential
danger to the aircraft so it could take appropriate action.
(k) An indication of the aircraft's ``IDENT'' to ATC. (Requires
flight crew entry.) ATC may request an aircraft to ``IDENT,'' to aid
controllers to quickly identify a specific aircraft. The pilot manually
inputs the aircraft's identity, which then highlights the aircraft on
the ATC scope. When activated, this message element allows
identification of the aircraft with which ATC is in communication.
(l) An indication of the aircraft's assigned ICAO 24-bit address.
ICAO 24-bit codes are unique and assigned to each individual aircraft.
These codes are necessary for aircraft used for international
operations. This code would provide the FAA with the future capability
to identify aircraft using the
[[Page 56955]]
ICAO 24-bit address. This capability addresses limits on future
capacity due to the finite number of aircraft that can be tracked with
discrete transponder codes.
(m) An indication of the emitter category. If ATC knows the emitter
category, it can determine separation minima based in part on a
particular aircraft's wake vortex. This information would be used to
provide air traffic controllers and ground crews with more efficient
information regarding a particular aircraft's constraints and
capabilities. Once the emitter category is set at installation, it
would not change. (Refer to TSO-C166a or TSO-C154b for additional
information.) Some examples of emitter categories to be used (as
specified in RTCA DO-260A, DO-242A, and DO-282A) include, but are not
limited to, the following:
Light (ICAO)--7,000 kg (15,500 lbs) or less.
Small aircraft--7,000 kg to 34,000 kg (15,500 lbs to
75,000 lbs).
Large aircraft--34,000 kg to 136,000 kg (75,000 lbs to
300,00 lbs).
High vortex large (i.e., B-757).
Heavy aircraft (ICAO)--136,000 kg (300,000 lbs) or more.
Rotorcraft.
(n) An indication whether a cockpit display of traffic information
(CDTI) is installed and operable. This message element would alert ATC
as to whether an aircraft has an operable CDTI \17\ installed. A CDTI
is necessary for aircraft to have ADS-B In capability. This message
element would indicate to ATC which aircraft are capable of receiving
ADS-B In services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ CDTI is the function of presenting surveillance traffic
information (e.g., airborne or surface) to the flight crew. To
display traffic, the CDTI may use a dedicated display or a shared
multi-function display (MFD) device. The CDTI is capable of
displaying position information for nearby aircraft and ADS-B-
equipped airport surface vehicles. The CDTI consolidates ADS-B
traffic targets, terrain, weather, and other products relative to
the pilot's own aircraft or flight operation. It allows pilots to
display textual and graphical information provided by the ADS-B
System and Broadcast Services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(o) An indication of the aircraft's geometric altitude. The
geometric altitude is a measure of altitude provided by a satellite-
based position service, determined mathematically, based on a three-
dimensional position in space. This message element is necessary to
confirm accuracy or discrepancies between geometric and barometric
altitude, which changes as a function of air pressure in the
environment. The message element would serve as a tool for validating
positioning services.
4. Navigation Position Sensor and the Accuracy and Integrity of the
ADS-B Message
ADS-B Out continuously transmits aircraft information through the
selected broadcast data links of 1090ES or UAT. The aircraft's lateral
and longitudinal position and velocity are proposed data elements
transmitted in the broadcast message. The navigation position sensor is
equipment onboard the aircraft that computes a geodetic position
(latitude and longitude) that can be a separate sensor or integrated
into other navigation equipment or system onboard the aircraft.
(Examples of such equipment are LORAN C, GPS, GPS-WAAS, DME/DME and
Inertial Reference Unit (IRU).)
The accuracy and integrity of these broadcast message elements
transmitted from the aircraft to the ground stations depends on the
aircraft's navigation position sensor and the signal source from which
the position is derived. The accuracy and integrity of the transmitted
aircraft position and velocity are critical for use in surveillance and
various airborne and surface applications. The accuracy and integrity
of transmitted information expressed by ADS-B avionics is measured by
the Navigation Accuracy Category for Position (NACp), the Navigation
Accuracy Category for Velocity (NACv), the NIC and the SIL.
An aircraft transmitting its position and velocity with the
accuracy and integrity proposed in part 91, Appendix H, Section 3 (ADS-
B Out Performance Requirements for NIC, NAC, and SIL) would be more
accurately identified by ATC than it would be in today's radar
environment. The confidence with respect to the accuracy of the
position and velocity reported by ADS-B Out would enable the future
applications discussed further in this proposal that simply could not
be provided by existing surveillance systems. While existing
surveillance systems provide information that is sufficient for
separation purposes and the capacity needs of today's traffic
environment, a more responsive and versatile ATC system will need
improved accuracy and integrity of broadcast information for future
surveillance performance. The values proposed would ensure that the
information ATC receives has the level of performance and the requisite
confidence in the accuracy of that information necessary to control
aircraft. Increasing the quality and standards for surveillance
information presents new opportunities for efficiency and capacity
improvements in the NAS, and the potential for future self-separation
or air-to-air applications of ADS-B.
The NACp specifies the accuracy of the aircraft's horizontal
position information (latitude and longitude) and the vertical
geometric position transmitted from the aircraft's avionics. All
aircraft position information has a margin of error and the accuracy
category specifies that margin. The NACp specifies with 95 percent
probability that the reported information is correct within an
associated allowance. (The horizontal 95% bound error allowance
resembles an imaginary circle around the aircraft with a radius
equivalent to the NACp defined value.) ATC and aircraft equipped for
ADS-B In would monitor the NACp reporting to ensure that the accuracy
supports the intended operational use. Not all navigation position
sensors are capable of providing the necessary aircraft information
with the accuracy and integrity needed to support certain surveillance
applications.\18\ In order to use ADS-B Out for surveillance and
separation, the NACp value must have a small margin of error in
position reporting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Surveillance applications are discussed further in Section
V of this NPRM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In today's radar surveillance environment, aircraft position
accuracy is required to be within 0.3 NM for operations in the en route
airspace, and 0.1 NM for operations within terminal area airspace. An
aircraft broadcasting its position with a NACp equal to or greater than
7 would provide a horizontal position accuracy of at least 0.1 NM with
no specific requirement for vertical (geometric) position accuracy.
Aircraft position reported at a NACp equal to or greater than 7 would
meet the minimum radar accuracy requirement for terminal area
operations and exceed radar performance for en route operations.
Therefore, the FAA believes that the minimum accuracy requirement
necessary to maintain an equivalent level of surveillance in the
terminal airspace area (and provide for equivalent separation as that
in today's radar environment) would be a NACp of 7. The FAA is not,
however, engaging in this rulemaking simply to meet the level of
surveillance that exists in the current infrastructure, or to establish
a new surveillance system that would only enable separation performance
equivalent to that realized today. ADS-B performance is intended to go
beyond today's standards for accuracy and provide a platform for
NextGen. In order to accomplish that goal, we propose a minimum
accuracy value of NACp 9 in
[[Page 56956]]
all airspace areas that ADS-B would be required. This proposed accuracy
requirement would provide horizontal position information for ADS-B Out
equipped aircraft to within 30 meters (0.016NM) horizontally and
vertical (geometric)