Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC; Boston Stock Exchange, Inc; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated and International Securities Exchange, LLC: Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Changes Relating to the Definition of a Complex Trade; NYSE Arca, Inc.: Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Definition of a Complex Trade, 56814-56815 [E7-19558]
Download as PDF
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
56814
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 192 / Thursday, October 4, 2007 / Notices
same group of investment companies;
(ii) the acquiring company holds only
securities of acquired companies that
are part of the same group of investment
companies, government securities, and
short-term paper; (iii) the aggregate sales
loads and distribution-related fees of the
acquiring company and the acquired
company are not excessive under rules
adopted pursuant to section 22(b) or
section 22(c) of the Act by a securities
association registered under section 15A
of the Exchange Act or by the
Commission; and (iv) the acquired
company has a policy that prohibits it
from acquiring securities of registered
open-end management investment
companies or registered unit investment
trusts in reliance on section 12(d)(1)(F)
or (G) of the Act.
3. Rule 12d1–2 under the Act permits
a registered open-end investment
company or a registered unit investment
trust that relies on section 12(d)(1)(G) of
the Act to acquire, in addition to
securities issued by another registered
investment company in the same group
of investment companies, government
securities, and short-term paper: (1)
Securities issued by an investment
company that is not in the same group
of investment companies, when the
acquisition is in reliance on section
12(d)(1)(A) or 12(d)(1)(F) of the Act; (2)
securities (other than securities issued
by an investment company); and (3)
securities issued by a money market
fund, when the investment is in reliance
on rule 12d1–1 under the Act. For the
purposes of rule 12d1–2, ‘‘securities’’
means any security as defined in section
2(a)(36) of the Act.
4. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that
the Commission may exempt any
person, security, or transaction from any
provisions of the Act, or from any rule
under the Act, if such exemption is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the
protection of investors and the purposes
fairly intended by the policies and
provisions of the Act.
5. Applicants state that the proposed
arrangement would comply with the
provisions of rule 12d1–2 under the Act,
but for the fact that the Funds may
invest a portion of their assets in Other
Investments. Applicants request an
order under section 6(c) of the Act for
an exemption from rule 12d1–2(a) to
allow the Funds to invest in Other
Investments. Applicants assert that
permitting the Funds to invest in Other
Investments as described in the
application would not raise any of the
concerns that the requirements of
section 12(d)(1) were designed to
address.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:20 Oct 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
Applicants’ Conditions
Applicants agree that the order
granting the requested relief will be
subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to approving any investment
advisory agreement under section 15 of
the Act, the board of trustees of the
appropriate Fund, including a majority
of the trustees who are not ‘‘interested
persons,’’ as defined in section 2(a)(19)
of the Act, will find that the advisory
fees, if any, charged under the
agreement are based on services
provided that are in addition to, rather
than duplicative of, services provided
pursuant to any Underlying Fund’s
advisory agreement. Such finding, and
the basis upon which the finding is
made, will be recorded fully in the
minute books of the appropriate Fund.
2. Applicants will comply with all
provisions of rule 12d1–2 under the Act,
except for paragraph (a)(2), to the extent
that it restricts any Fund from investing
in Other Investments as described in the
application.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–19639 Filed 10–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–56555; File Nos. SR–Amex–
2007–65; SR–BSE–2007–45; SR–CBOE–
2007–64; SR–ISE–2007–44; SR–NYSEArca–
2007–65]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
American Stock Exchange LLC;
Boston Stock Exchange, Inc; Chicago
Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
and International Securities Exchange,
LLC: Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Changes Relating to the Definition of a
Complex Trade; NYSE Arca, Inc.:
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto
Relating to the Definition of a Complex
Trade
September 27, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’)1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 27,
2007, September 13, 2007, June 12,
2007, June 1, 2007, and July 6, 2007, the
American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’), the Boston Stock Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘BSE’’), the Chicago Board Options
1 15
2 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(l).
CFR 240. 19b–4.
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’), the
International Securities Exchange, LLC
(‘‘ISE’’), and NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE
Arca’’) (each, an ‘‘Exchange’’ and,
collectively, the ‘‘Exchanges’’),
respectively, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
changes as described in Items I, II and
III below, which Items have been
substantially prepared by the
Exchanges. On July 11, 2007, NYSE
Arca filed Amendment No. 1 to its
proposed rule change.3 The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule
changes, as amended, from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organizations’
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Changes
The Exchanges propose to amend the
definition of ‘‘complex trade’’ set forth
in their respective rules pertaining to
the Intermarket Options Linkage
(‘‘Linkage’’) to include stock-option
trades. The text of the proposed rule
changes is available at the Exchanges’
Web sites,4 the Exchanges’ principal
offices, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organizations’
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Changes
In their filings with the Commission,
each Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
their proposed rule changes and
discussed any comments they received
on the proposed rule changes. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchanges have prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organizations’
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Changes
1. Purpose
Under Section 8(c)(iii)(G) of the Plan
for the Purpose of Creating and
Operating an Intermarket Option
Linkage (‘‘Linkage Plan’’),5 the Linkage
3 Amendment No. 1 to SR–NYSEArca–2007–65
effected technical corrections to the proposed rule
change.
4 See https://www.amex.com, https://
www.bostonstock.com, https://www.cboe.com,
https://www.ise.com, and https://www.nyse.com.
5 On July 28, 2000, the Commission approved a
national market system plan for the purpose of
creating and operating the Linkage proposed by
Amex, CBOE, and ISE. See Securities Exchange Act
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 192 / Thursday, October 4, 2007 / Notices
Plan participants (‘‘Participants’’) may
amend the definition of the term
‘‘complex trade’’ from time to time. The
Participants have agreed to update the
definition of ‘‘complex trade’’ to extend
the associated trade-through liability
exemption to cover certain stock-option
trades. Accordingly, each of the
Exchanges has submitted a proposal that
would amend each of the Exchange’s
definition of ‘‘complex trade,’’ set forth
in the Exchange’s respective rules
pertaining to the Linkage, to include the
execution of a stock option order to buy
or sell a stated number of units of an
underlying stock or a security
convertible into the underlying stock
(‘‘convertible security’’) coupled with
the purchase or sale of option
contract(s) on the opposite side of the
market representing either (A) The same
number of units of the underlying stock
or convertible security, or (B) the
number of units of the underlying stock
or convertible security necessary to
create a delta neutral position, but in no
case in a ratio greater than 8 option
contracts per unit of trading of the
underlying stock or convertible security
established for that series by the
Options Clearing Corporation.6
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchanges believe the proposed
rule changes are consistent with the Act
and the rules and regulations under the
Act applicable to national securities
exchanges and, in particular, the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.7
Specifically, the Exchanges believe the
proposed rule changes are consistent
with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,8 which provides that the
rules of an exchange be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
Release No. 43086 (July 28, 2000), 65 FR 48023
(August 4, 2000). Subsequently, Phlx, Pacific
Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a NYSE Arca, Inc.), and BSE
joined the Linkage Plan. See Securities Exchange
Act Release Nos. 43573 (November 16, 2000), 65 FR
70851 (November 28, 2000); 43574 (November 16,
2000), 65 FR 70850 (November 28, 2000); and 49198
(February 5, 2004), 69 FR 7029 (February 12, 2004).
6 The Exchanges propose to amend their
respective rules that define ‘‘complex trade’’ for
Linkage purposes, namely Amex Rule 940(b)(3),
Boston Options Exchange Rule Chapter XII, Section
1(c), CBOE Rule 6.80(4), ISE Rule 1900(3), and
NYSEArca Rule 6.92(a)(4).
The Phlx has filed a proposed rule change with
the Commission to amend its definitions of
‘‘synthetic option’’ and ‘‘complex trade’’ to conform
such definitions with the related ‘‘stock option’’
and ‘‘complex trade’’ definitions of the Exchanges.
See SR–Phlx–2007–40.
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:20 Oct 03, 2007
Jkt 214001
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organizations’
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchanges believe that the
proposed rule changes would impose no
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organizations’
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Changes Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchanges have neither solicited
nor received comments on these
proposals.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
As the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organizations consent, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule changes, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule changes
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
changes are consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Numbers SR–Amex–2007–65; SR–BSE–
2007–45; SR–CBOE–2007–64; SR–ISE–
2007–44; and SR–NYSEArca–2007–65
on the subject line.
on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submissions, all
subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed
rule changes that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule changes between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of the filings also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal offices of the Exchanges.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Numbers SR–Amex-2007–65; SR–BSE–
2007–45; SR–CBOE–2007–64; SR–ISE–
2007–44; and SR–NYSEArca–2007–65
and should be submitted on or before
October 25, 2007.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–19558 Filed 10–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Numbers SR–Amex-2007–65; SR–BSE–
2007–45; SR–CBOE–2007–64; SR–ISE–
2007–44; and SR–NYSEArca–2007–65.
These file numbers should be included
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56815
9 17
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
04OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 192 (Thursday, October 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56814-56815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-19558]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-56555; File Nos. SR-Amex-2007-65; SR-BSE-2007-45; SR-
CBOE-2007-64; SR-ISE-2007-44; SR-NYSEArca-2007-65]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC;
Boston Stock Exchange, Inc; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated and International Securities Exchange, LLC: Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Changes Relating to the Definition of a Complex
Trade; NYSE Arca, Inc.: Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Definition of a Complex Trade
September 27, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 27, 2007, September 13, 2007, June 12, 2007, June 1, 2007, and
July 6, 2007, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex''), the Boston
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``BSE''), the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``CBOE''), the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(``ISE''), and NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') (each, an ``Exchange''
and, collectively, the ``Exchanges''), respectively, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
changes as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have
been substantially prepared by the Exchanges. On July 11, 2007, NYSE
Arca filed Amendment No. 1 to its proposed rule change.\3\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule changes, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(l).
\2\ 17 CFR 240. 19b-4.
\3\ Amendment No. 1 to SR-NYSEArca-2007-65 effected technical
corrections to the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Changes
The Exchanges propose to amend the definition of ``complex trade''
set forth in their respective rules pertaining to the Intermarket
Options Linkage (``Linkage'') to include stock-option trades. The text
of the proposed rule changes is available at the Exchanges' Web
sites,\4\ the Exchanges' principal offices, and at the Commission's
Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See https://www.amex.com, https://www.bostonstock.com, https://
www.cboe.com, https://www.ise.com, and https://www.nyse.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Changes
In their filings with the Commission, each Exchange included
statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, their proposed
rule changes and discussed any comments they received on the proposed
rule changes. The text of these statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The Exchanges have prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Changes
1. Purpose
Under Section 8(c)(iii)(G) of the Plan for the Purpose of Creating
and Operating an Intermarket Option Linkage (``Linkage Plan''),\5\ the
Linkage
[[Page 56815]]
Plan participants (``Participants'') may amend the definition of the
term ``complex trade'' from time to time. The Participants have agreed
to update the definition of ``complex trade'' to extend the associated
trade-through liability exemption to cover certain stock-option trades.
Accordingly, each of the Exchanges has submitted a proposal that would
amend each of the Exchange's definition of ``complex trade,'' set forth
in the Exchange's respective rules pertaining to the Linkage, to
include the execution of a stock option order to buy or sell a stated
number of units of an underlying stock or a security convertible into
the underlying stock (``convertible security'') coupled with the
purchase or sale of option contract(s) on the opposite side of the
market representing either (A) The same number of units of the
underlying stock or convertible security, or (B) the number of units of
the underlying stock or convertible security necessary to create a
delta neutral position, but in no case in a ratio greater than 8 option
contracts per unit of trading of the underlying stock or convertible
security established for that series by the Options Clearing
Corporation.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ On July 28, 2000, the Commission approved a national market
system plan for the purpose of creating and operating the Linkage
proposed by Amex, CBOE, and ISE. See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 43086 (July 28, 2000), 65 FR 48023 (August 4, 2000).
Subsequently, Phlx, Pacific Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a NYSE Arca, Inc.),
and BSE joined the Linkage Plan. See Securities Exchange Act Release
Nos. 43573 (November 16, 2000), 65 FR 70851 (November 28, 2000);
43574 (November 16, 2000), 65 FR 70850 (November 28, 2000); and
49198 (February 5, 2004), 69 FR 7029 (February 12, 2004).
\6\ The Exchanges propose to amend their respective rules that
define ``complex trade'' for Linkage purposes, namely Amex Rule
940(b)(3), Boston Options Exchange Rule Chapter XII, Section 1(c),
CBOE Rule 6.80(4), ISE Rule 1900(3), and NYSEArca Rule 6.92(a)(4).
The Phlx has filed a proposed rule change with the Commission to
amend its definitions of ``synthetic option'' and ``complex trade''
to conform such definitions with the related ``stock option'' and
``complex trade'' definitions of the Exchanges. See SR-Phlx-2007-40.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchanges believe the proposed rule changes are consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations under the Act applicable to
national securities exchanges and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.\7\ Specifically, the Exchanges believe the
proposed rule changes are consistent with the requirements of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ which provides that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchanges believe that the proposed rule changes would impose
no burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Changes Received From Members, Participants or Others
The Exchanges have neither solicited nor received comments on these
proposals.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) As the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organizations consent, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule changes, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
changes should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
changes are consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any
of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Numbers SR-Amex-2007-65; SR-BSE-2007-45; SR-CBOE-2007-64; SR-ISE-
2007-44; and SR-NYSEArca-2007-65 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Numbers SR-Amex-2007-65; SR-BSE-
2007-45; SR-CBOE-2007-64; SR-ISE-2007-44; and SR-NYSEArca-2007-65.
These file numbers should be included on the subject line if e-mail is
used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submissions, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule changes that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule changes between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filings also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchanges. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Numbers SR-Amex-2007-65; SR-BSE-2007-
45; SR-CBOE-2007-64; SR-ISE-2007-44; and SR-NYSEArca-2007-65 and should
be submitted on or before October 25, 2007.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-19558 Filed 10-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P