Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements, 56130-56132 [07-4796]
Download as PDF
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
56130
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 2, 2007 / Notices
The EIS Process and the Role of
Participating Agencies and the Public
The purpose of the NEPA process is
to explore, in a public setting, the effects
of the proposed project and its
alternatives on the physical, human,
and natural environment. The FTA and
METRO will evaluate all significant
environmental, social, and economic
impacts of the construction and
operation of the proposed project.
Impact areas to be addressed include:
Land use; development potential;
secondary development; land
acquisition, displacements, and
relocations; cultural resources
(including impacts on historical and
archaeological resources); parklands and
recreation areas; visual and aesthetic
qualities; air quality; noise and
vibration; ecosystems (including
threatened and endangered species);
energy use; business and neighborhood
disruptions; environmental justice;
changes in traffic and pedestrian
circulation and congestion; and changes
in transit service and patronage.
Measures to avoid, minimize, or
mitigate any significant adverse impacts
will be identified and evaluated.
The methodology for evaluation of
impacts will focus on the areas of
investigation mentioned above. As the
public involvement and agency
consultation process proceeds,
additional evaluation criteria and
impact assessment measures will be
included in the analysis. Potential
alternatives will be developed to a
conceptual level, and will be screened
and ranked against these evaluation
criteria and local community
considerations. Travel time savings,
potential for congestion reduction and
improved mobility options for residents
of the City of Phoenix and adjacent
metropolitan areas will be assessed for
the transportation alternatives
considered. The public involvement
program and agency coordination plan
discussed below will provide the
vehicle through which these evaluation
analyses will be conducted.
The regulations implementing NEPA,
as well as provisions of the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU), call for public
involvement in the EIS process. Section
6002 of SAFETEA–LU requires that FTA
and METRO do the following: (1)
Extend an invitation to other Federal
and non-Federal agencies and Indian
tribes that may have an interest in the
proposed project to become
‘‘participating agencies’’; (2) provide an
opportunity for involvement by
participating agencies and the public in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Oct 01, 2007
Jkt 214001
helping to define the purpose and need
for a proposed project, as well as the
range of alternatives for consideration in
the EIS; and (3) establish a plan for
coordinating public and agency
participation in and comment on the
environmental review process.
A list of interested agencies has been
developed, and an invitation to become
a participating agency, with the scoping
information packet appended, will be
extended to other Federal and nonFederal agencies and Indian tribes that
may have an interest in the proposed
project. It is possible that we may not be
able to identify all Federal and nonFederal agencies and Indian tribes that
may have such an interest. Any Federal
or non-Federal agency or Indian tribe
interested in the proposed project that
does not receive an invitation to become
a participating agency should notify, at
the earliest opportunity, the person
identified above under ADDRESSES.
A comprehensive Public Involvement
Program will be developed, and a public
and agency involvement Coordination
Plan will be created. The Public
Involvement Program will include a full
range of involvement activities.
Activities will include outreach to local
and county officials and community and
civic groups; a public scoping process to
define the issues of concern among all
parties interested in the project;
organizing periodic meetings with
various local agencies, organizations
and committees; a public hearing upon
release of the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS); development
and distribution of project newsletters
and the establishment of a project Web
site. Opportunities to participate in the
scoping process, in addition to the
public meetings announced in this
notice, will be made available. Specific
mechanisms for involvement will be
detailed in the Public Involvement
Program.
METRO may seek New Starts funding
for the proposed project under 49 U.S.C.
5309 and will therefore be subject to
New Starts regulations (49 CFR part
611). The New Starts regulations require
a planning Alternatives Analysis that
leads to the selection of a locally
preferred alternative and the inclusion
of the locally preferred alternative as
part of the long-range transportation
plan adopted by the MAG. The New
Starts regulations also require the
submission of certain projectjustification information in support of a
request to initiate preliminary
engineering, and this information is
normally developed in conjunction with
the NEPA process. Pertinent New Starts
evaluation criteria will be included in
the Final EIS.
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The AA/EIS will be prepared in
accordance with NEPA and its
implementing regulations issued by the
Council on Environmental Quality (40
CFR parts 1500–1508) and with the
FTA/Federal Highway Administration
regulations ‘‘Environmental Impact and
Related Procedures’’ (23 CFR part 771).
In accordance with 23 CFR 771.105(a)
and 771.133, FTA will comply with all
Federal environmental laws,
regulations, and executive orders
applicable to the proposed project
during the environmental review
process to the maximum extent
practicable. These requirements
include, but are not limited to, the
environmental and public hearing
provisions of Federal transit laws (49
U.S.C. 5301(e), 5323(b), and 5324), the
project-level air quality conformity
regulation of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) (40 CFR part
93), the Section 404(b)(1) guidelines of
EPA (40 CFR part 230), the regulation
implementing Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act (36
CFR part 800), the regulation
implementing Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (50 CFR part
402), and Executive Orders 12898 on
environmental justice, 11988 on
floodplain management and 11990 on
wetlands. The Section 4(f) Evaluation
will comply with the United States
Department of Transportation Act (23
CFR 771.135).
Issued on: September 27, 2007.
Leslie T. Rogers,
Regional Administrator, FTA Region IX.
[FR Doc. E7–19417 Filed 10–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket Number NHTSA–2007–
28638]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
an extension of a currently approved
collection.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 2, 2007 / Notices
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatement of previously approved
collections.
This document describes one
collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 3, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
[identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA 2007–28638] by any of the
following methods:
If filing comments by September 27,
2007, please use:
• Web site: https://dms.dot.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the Department of
Transportation Docket Management
System electronic docket site. No
electronic submissions will be accepted
between September 28, 2007, and
October 1, 2007.
If filing comments on or after October
1, 2007, use:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
Alternatively, you can file comments
using the following methods:
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the Public Participation heading of
the Supplementary Information section
of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.dms.dot.gov or https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Oct 01, 2007
Jkt 214001
dms.dot.gov until September 27, 2007,
or the street address listed above. The
DOT docket may be offline at times
between September 28 through
September 30 to migrate to the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS).
On October 1, 2007, the internet access
to the docket will be at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Complete copies of each request for
collection of information may be
obtained at no change from Carlita
Ballard, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey, SE.,
Room W43–439, NVS–131, Washington,
DC 20590. Ms. Ballard’s telephone
number is (202) 366–0846. Please
identify the relevant collection of
information by referring to its OMB
Control Number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must first publish a
document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and
otherwise consult with members of the
public and affected agencies concerning
each proposed collection of information.
The OMB has promulgated
regulations describing what must be
included in such a document. Under
OMB’s regulation (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d),
an agency must ask for public comment
on the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected and;
(iv) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g. permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed
collections of information:
Title: Petitions for Exemption from
the Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard
(49 CFR part 543).
OMB Control Number: 2127–0542.
Form Number: None.
Affected Public: Motor vehicle
manufacturers.
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56131
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: Three years from approval
date.
Abstract: Manufacturers of passenger
vehicle lines may petition the agency for
an exemption from Part 541
requirements, if the line is equipped
with an anti-theft device as standard
equipment and meets agency criteria.
Device must be as effective as
partsmarking.
Estimated Annual Burden: 3,164.
Number of Respondents: 14.
49 U.S.C. Chapter 331 requires the
Secretary of Transportation to
promulgate a theft prevention standard
to provide for the identification of
certain motor vehicles and their major
replacement parts to impede motor
vehicle theft. 49 U.S.C. 33106 provides
for an exemption to this identification
process by petitions from manufacturers
who equip covered vehicles with
standard original equipment antitheft
devices, which the Secretary determines
are likely to be as effective in reducing
or deterring theft as partsmarking.
NHTSA may exempt a vehicle line from
the partsmarking requirements, if the
manufacturer installs an antitheft device
as standard equipment on the entire
vehicle line for which it seeks an
exemption and NHTSA determines that
the antitheft device is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the partsmarking requirements. In
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 33106, after
model year (MY) 2000, the number of
new exemptions is contingent on a
finding by the Attorney General as part
of its long-range review of effectiveness.
After consulting with DOJ, the agency
decided it could continue granting one
exemption per model year pending the
results of the long-term review.
In a final rule published on April 6,
2004, the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard was extended to
include all passenger cars and
multipurpose passenger vehicles with a
gross vehicle rating of 6,000 pounds or
less, and to light duty trucks with major
parts that are interchangeable with a
majority of the covered major parts of
multipurpose passenger vehicles.
Consistent with this DOJ consultation,
the April 6, 2004 final rule amended the
general requirements of Section 543.5 of
Chapter 49 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, allowing a manufacturer to
petition NHTSA to grant an exemption
for one additional line of its passenger
motor vehicles from the requirements of
the theft prevention standard for each
model year after MY 1996. The final
rule became effective September 1,
2006.
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
56132
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 2, 2007 / Notices
Prior to September 1, 2006,
manufacturers were only allowed to
petition NHTSA for high-theft vehicle
lines. In its April 6, 2004 final rule, the
agency amended part 543 to allow
vehicle manufacturers to file petitions to
exempt all vehicle lines that would
become subject to parts-marking
requirements beginning with the
effective date of the final rule. As a
result of this amendment, vehicle
manufacturers are allowed to file
petitions to exempt all vehicle lines that
would become subject to the partsmarking requirements regardless of their
theft status (high or low). While there
are approximately 27 vehicle
manufacturers, since the effective date
of the rule, a maximum of 14 petitions
for exemption from the parts-marking
requirements have been received by the
agency for any single model year. We
anticipate this to remain the average
number of yearly responses received by
the agency.
NHTSA estimates that the average
hours per submittal will be 226, for a
total annual burden of 3,164. This was
an increase from the previous OMB
inventory of 1,130 burden hours.
NHTSA estimates that the cost
associated with these burden hours is
$36.62 per hour, for a total cost of
approximately $115,866.
Comments are invited on: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Issued on: September 24, 2007.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 07–4796 Filed 10–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
September 26, 2007.
The Department of Treasury has
submitted the following public
information collection requirement(s) to
OMB for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Copies of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Oct 01, 2007
Jkt 214001
submission(s) may be obtained by
calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance
Officer listed. Comments regarding this
information collection should be
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed
and to the Treasury Department
Clearance Officer, Department of the
Treasury, Room 11000, 1750
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20220.
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503.
Robert Dahl,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–19366 Filed 10–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
DATES:
Written comments should be
received on or before November 1, 2007
to be assured of consideration.
Senior Executive Service;
Departmental Offices Performance
Review Board
Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration (TIGTA)
AGENCY:
OMB Number: 1591—New.
Type of Review: Emergency.
Title: Refund Anticipation Loans—
Individual Taxpayers.
Description: The Treasury Inspector
General for Tax Administration
(TIGTA), as part of its FY 2008 audit
plan, will interview, via survey, a valid
sample of individual taxpayers who
received Refund Anticipation Loans
(RALs) after submitting electronically
filed (e-file) tax returns. RALs target
low-income taxpayers, especially those
who receive an Earned Income Tax
Credit (EITC) or who do not have
banking accounts. Because the duration
of a RAL is approximately 7–14 days
(the difference between the time a RALs
are obtained and when they are repaid
by with taxpayers’ refunds), fees for
these loans translate into triple digit
annualized interest rates. While the IRS
has eliminated the marketing of RALs
from its Free File Program, educating
taxpayers about the cost and burden of
RALs and the ability to receive refunds
quickly without RALs would further
help reduce the financial burden RALs
place on taxpayers. In addition, this
data will help in learning how RALs
affect tax administration, what changes
are possible and could be taken to better
monitor e-file providers, and what
actions could be taken to mitigate
burden through taxpayer education and/
or changes to the administration of the
tax system.
Respondents: Individuals or
Households.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 51
hours.
Clearance Officer: Joseph Ananka,
(202) 622–5964, Treasury Inspector
General for Tax Administration, 1125
15th Street, NW., Suite 700A,
Washington, DC 20005.
OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt,
(202) 395–7316, Office of Management
and Budget, Room 10235, New
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Treasury Department.
Notice of members of the
Departmental Offices Performances
Review Board.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
4314(c)(4), this notice announces the
appointment of members of the
Departmental Offices Performance
Review Board (PRB). The purpose of
this Board is to review and make
recommendations concerning proposed
performance appraisals, ratings, bonuses
and other appropriate personnel actions
for incumbents of SES positions in the
Departmental Offices, excluding the
Legal Division. The Board will perform
PRB functions for other bureau
positions if requested.
Composition of Departmental Offices
PRB: The Board shall consist of at least
three members. In the case of an
appraisal of a career appointee, more
than half the members shall consist of
career appointees. The names and titles
of the Board members are as follows:
Abbott, Matthew, Deputy Assistant
Secretary (Federal Finance);
Carfine, Kenneth E., Fiscal Assistant
Secretary;
Carroll, Robert J., Deputy Assistant
Secretary (Tax Analysis);
Duffy, Michael D., Deputy Assistant
Secretary/Chief Information Officer;
Eddy, Lynn M., Associate Chief
Information Officer (HR Connect);
Foster, Wesley T., Deputy Assistant
Secretary (Management and Budget);
Fuller, Reese H., Advanced Counterfeit
Deterrence Program Director.
Gerardi, Geraldine A., Director for
Business and International Taxation;
Glaser, Daniel L., Deputy Assistant
Secretary (Terrorist Financing and
Financial Crimes);
Granat, Rochelle F., Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Human Resources and
Chief Human Capital Officer;
Daly, Nova James, Deputy Assistant
Secretary (Investment Security);
Dick, Denise, White House Liaison;
Foster, Robert U., Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Legislative Affairs
(Banking & Finance);
Foster, Wesley T., Deputy Assistant
Secretary (Management and Budget);
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56130-56132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4796]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket Number NHTSA-2007-28638]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for public comment on an extension of a currently
approved collection.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public
[[Page 56131]]
comment on proposed collections of information, including extensions
and reinstatement of previously approved collections.
This document describes one collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 3, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA 2007-28638] by any of the following methods:
If filing comments by September 27, 2007, please use:
Web site: https://dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments on the Department of Transportation Docket
Management System electronic docket site. No electronic submissions
will be accepted between September 28, 2007, and October 1, 2007.
If filing comments on or after October 1, 2007, use:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Alternatively, you can file comments using the following methods:
Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Public
Participation heading of the Supplementary Information section of this
document. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.dms.dot.gov or https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://dms.dot.gov until September 27, 2007,
or the street address listed above. The DOT docket may be offline at
times between September 28 through September 30 to migrate to the
Federal Docket Management System (FDMS). On October 1, 2007, the
internet access to the docket will be at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for accessing the dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Complete copies of each request for
collection of information may be obtained at no change from Carlita
Ballard, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey, SE., Room W43-439, NVS-131,
Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's telephone number is (202) 366-0846.
Please identify the relevant collection of information by referring to
its OMB Control Number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must first publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information.
The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must be
included in such a document. Under OMB's regulation (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected and;
(iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic
submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed collections of information:
Title: Petitions for Exemption from the Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR part 543).
OMB Control Number: 2127-0542.
Form Number: None.
Affected Public: Motor vehicle manufacturers.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from approval
date.
Abstract: Manufacturers of passenger vehicle lines may petition the
agency for an exemption from Part 541 requirements, if the line is
equipped with an anti-theft device as standard equipment and meets
agency criteria. Device must be as effective as partsmarking.
Estimated Annual Burden: 3,164.
Number of Respondents: 14.
49 U.S.C. Chapter 331 requires the Secretary of Transportation to
promulgate a theft prevention standard to provide for the
identification of certain motor vehicles and their major replacement
parts to impede motor vehicle theft. 49 U.S.C. 33106 provides for an
exemption to this identification process by petitions from
manufacturers who equip covered vehicles with standard original
equipment antitheft devices, which the Secretary determines are likely
to be as effective in reducing or deterring theft as partsmarking.
NHTSA may exempt a vehicle line from the partsmarking requirements, if
the manufacturer installs an antitheft device as standard equipment on
the entire vehicle line for which it seeks an exemption and NHTSA
determines that the antitheft device is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
partsmarking requirements. In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 33106, after
model year (MY) 2000, the number of new exemptions is contingent on a
finding by the Attorney General as part of its long-range review of
effectiveness. After consulting with DOJ, the agency decided it could
continue granting one exemption per model year pending the results of
the long-term review.
In a final rule published on April 6, 2004, the Federal Motor
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard was extended to include all passenger
cars and multipurpose passenger vehicles with a gross vehicle rating of
6,000 pounds or less, and to light duty trucks with major parts that
are interchangeable with a majority of the covered major parts of
multipurpose passenger vehicles. Consistent with this DOJ consultation,
the April 6, 2004 final rule amended the general requirements of
Section 543.5 of Chapter 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
allowing a manufacturer to petition NHTSA to grant an exemption for one
additional line of its passenger motor vehicles from the requirements
of the theft prevention standard for each model year after MY 1996. The
final rule became effective September 1, 2006.
[[Page 56132]]
Prior to September 1, 2006, manufacturers were only allowed to
petition NHTSA for high-theft vehicle lines. In its April 6, 2004 final
rule, the agency amended part 543 to allow vehicle manufacturers to
file petitions to exempt all vehicle lines that would become subject to
parts-marking requirements beginning with the effective date of the
final rule. As a result of this amendment, vehicle manufacturers are
allowed to file petitions to exempt all vehicle lines that would become
subject to the parts-marking requirements regardless of their theft
status (high or low). While there are approximately 27 vehicle
manufacturers, since the effective date of the rule, a maximum of 14
petitions for exemption from the parts-marking requirements have been
received by the agency for any single model year. We anticipate this to
remain the average number of yearly responses received by the agency.
NHTSA estimates that the average hours per submittal will be 226,
for a total annual burden of 3,164. This was an increase from the
previous OMB inventory of 1,130 burden hours. NHTSA estimates that the
cost associated with these burden hours is $36.62 per hour, for a total
cost of approximately $115,866.
Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Issued on: September 24, 2007.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 07-4796 Filed 10-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-M