Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in US-Zeroing (EC); Notice of Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act: Antidumping Duty Order on Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils From Italy, 54640-54642 [E7-18991]
Download as PDF
54640
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 26, 2007 / Notices
arriving for the meeting, please enter the
South Agriculture Building through the
Second Wing entrance on C Street, SW.
For Further Information About the
39th Session of the CCFH Contact:
Rebecca Buckner, Alternate to the U.S.
Delegate to the CCFH, FDA, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition,
Harvey W. Wiley Federal Building, 5100
Paint Branch Parkway, College Park, MD
20740–3835, Phone: (301) 436–1486,
Fax: (301) 436–2632. E-mail:
Rebecca.Buckner@fda.hhs.gov.
For Further Information About the
Public Meeting Contact: Amjad Ali,
International Issues Analyst, U.S. Codex
Office, Food Safety and Inspection
Service, Room 4861, South Agriculture
Building, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250, Phone:
(202) 205–7760, Fax: (202) 720–3157.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Codex Alimentarius (Codex) was
established in 1963 by two United
Nations organizations, the Food and
Agriculture Organization and the World
Health Organization. Through adoption
of food standards, codes of practice, and
other guidelines developed by its
committees, and by promoting their
adoption and implementation by
governments, Codex seeks to protect the
health of consumers and ensure fair
practices are used in trade.
The Codex Committee on Food
Hygiene was established to elaborate
codes, standards and related texts for
food hygiene. The Committee is hosted
by the United States.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Issues To Be Discussed at the Public
Meeting
The following items on the agenda for
the 39th Session of the CCFH will be
discussed during the public meeting:
• Matters Referred to the Committee
on Food Hygiene from the other Codex
bodies.
• Proposed Draft Code of Hygienic
Practice for Powdered Formulae for
Infants and Young Children.
• Proposed Draft Guidelines for the
Validation of Food Safety Control
Measures.
• Microbiological Criteria for Listeria
monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Foods.
• Discussion Paper on the Proposed
Draft Guidelines for the Control of
Campylobacter and Salmonella spp. in
Broiler (Young Bird) Chicken Meat.
• Principles and Guidelines for the
Conduct of Microbiological Risk
Management: Annex II: Guidance on
Microbiological Risk Management
Metrics.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Sep 25, 2007
Jkt 211001
• Discussion of the Report of the Ad
Hoc Working Group for Establishment
of CCFH Work Priorities.
Each issue listed will be fully
described in documents distributed, or
to be distributed, by the Secretariat prior
to the meeting. Members of the public
may access or request copies of these
documents (see ADDRESSES).
Public Meeting
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of
rulemaking and policy development is
important. Consequently, in an effort to
ensure that minorities, women, and
persons with disabilities are aware of
this notice, FSIS will announce it online
through the FSIS Web page located at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations/
2007_Notices_Index/. FSIS will also
make copies of this Federal Register
publication available through the FSIS
Constituent Update, which is used to
provide information regarding FSIS
policies, procedures, regulations,
Federal Register notices, FSIS public
meetings, and other types of information
that could affect or would be of interest
to constituents and stakeholders. The
Update is communicated via Listserv, a
free electronic mail subscription service
for industry, trade groups, consumer
interest groups, health professionals,
and other individuals who have asked
to be included. The Update is also
available on the FSIS Web page.
Through Listserv and the Web page,
FSIS is able to provide information to a
much broader and more diverse
audience. In addition, FSIS offers an
electronic mail subscription service
which provides automatic and
customized access to selected food
safety news and information. This
service is available at https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/news_and_events/
email_subscription/. Options range from
recalls to export information to
regulations, directives and notices.
Customers can add or delete
subscriptions themselves, and have the
option to password protect their
accounts.
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
At the September 26, 2007, public
meeting, draft U.S. positions on the
agenda items will be described and
discussed, and attendees will have the
opportunity to pose questions and offer
comments. Written comments may be
offered at the meeting or sent to the U.S.
Delegate for the 39th Session of the
CCFH, Dr. Robert Buchanan (see
ADDRESSES). Written comments should
state that they relate to activities of the
39th Session of the CCFH.
PO 00000
Done at Washington, DC, on: September
24, 2007.
F. Edward Scarbrough,
U.S. Manager for Codex Alimentarius.
[FR Doc. 07–4757 Filed 9–24–07; 12:06 pm]
Sfmt 4703
[A–475–824]
Implementation of the Findings of the
WTO Panel in US-Zeroing (EC); Notice
of Determination Under Section 129 of
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act:
Antidumping Duty Order on Stainless
Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils From
Italy
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 31, 2007, the U.S.
Trade Representative instructed the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) to implement the
Department’s findings under section 129
of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act
(URAA) regarding the offsetting of
dumped sales with non-dumped sales in
the above-referenced investigation
involving average-to-average
transactions. The Department issued its
finding on August 20, 2007, for stainless
steel sheet and strip in coils from Italy
(Italy SSSS) for ThyssenKrupp Acciai
Speciali Terni S.P.A. and ThyssenKrupp
AST USA, Inc. (collectively ‘‘TKAST’’).1
The Department hereby implements that
finding.
DATES: The effective date of this
determination is August 31, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel O’Brien, William Kovatch, or
Michael Rill, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1376, (202) 482–5052, or (202) 482–
3058, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
1 On April 30, 2007, the Department implemented
the findings of the World Trade Organization
(WTO) with respect to eleven investigations
challenged by the European Communities. For the
reasons detailed below, the final determination for
stainless steel sheet and strip in coils from Italy was
not included in the April 30, 2007, final
determinations. See Implementation of the Findings
of the WTO Panel in US-Zeroing (EC): Notice of
Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay
Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial
Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders,
72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007) (Implementation
Notice).
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 26, 2007 / Notices
Background
On February 22, 2007, the Department
initiated twelve proceedings under
section 129 of the URAA to implement
the WTO dispute settlement panel’s
report in United States—Laws,
Regulations and Methodology for
Calculating Dumping Margins
(‘‘Zeroing’’) (WT/DS294). See
Implementation of the Findings of the
WTO Panel in U.S. Zeroing (EC): Notice
of Initiation of Proceedings Under
Section 129 of the URAA; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Protective
Orders; and Proposed Timetable and
Procedures, 72 FR 9306 (March 1, 2007).
In each proceeding, the Department
recalculated the weighted-average
dumping margin, applying the
calculation methodology described in
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation
of the Weighted-Average Dumping
Margin During an Antidumping
Investigation; Final Modification, 71 FR
77722 (December 27, 2006).
On February 26, 2007, the Department
issued its preliminary determinations
and requested comments. See
Memorandum from Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, to David M.
Spooner, Assistant Secretary, Regarding
Section 129 Determinations: Calculation
of the Weighted-Average Margins dated
February 26, 2007 (Preliminary
Determination). TKAST, Allegheny
Ludlum Corporation, Armco Inc., J&L
Specialty Steel, Inc., Washington Steel
Division of Bethlehem Steel
Corporation, the United Steelworkers of
America, AFL-CIO/CLC, the Butler
Armco Independent Union, and the
Zanesville Armco Independent
Organization, Inc., (collectively,
‘‘petitioners’’) and the European Union
submitted case briefs with respect to
Italy SSSS. TKAST and petitioners
submitted rebuttal briefs. In its
comments to the Department, TKAST
alleged clerical errors in the
Department’s margin calculation in the
less-than-fair-value investigation and
Preliminary Determination. Because of
these allegations, we placed the original
less-than-fair-value investigation record
onto the record of this 129 proceeding
and invited interested parties to provide
comments on computational errors that
may have been present in the
Department’s recalculation of the
weighted-average dumping margin with
respect to TKAST. See the Department’s
Memo to the File from Angelica
Mendoza, Program Manager, and
Stephen Bailey, Case Analyst, through
Richard Weible, Office Director, AD/
CVD Operations/OFC 7, to the File,
titled Placement of Record from the
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation onto
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Sep 25, 2007
Jkt 211001
the Record of the Section 129
Determination, dated April 19, 2007.
The Department also held two public
hearings at the request of TKAST.
Because of the two hearings, and the
placement of the original less-than-fairvalue investigation record onto the
record of this 129 proceeding, the
Department was delayed in issuing its
final determination with respect to Italy
SSSS.
On August 20, 2007, the Department
issued its final results for the Section
129 Determination with respect to Italy
SSSS. See the Department’s Memo to
David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary
for Import Administration from Gary
Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration,
titled Issues and Decision Memorandum
for the Final Results of the Section 129
Determination, dated August 20, 2007
(Issues and Decision Memorandum). On
August 28, 2007, TKAST submitted an
allegation of ministerial errors and on
August 31, 2007, petitioners filed their
response to TKAST’s ministerial error
submission. The Department intends to
address all ministerial error comments
in a subsequent memorandum.
On August 24, and August 28, 2007,
consistent with section 129(b)(3) of the
URAA, the U.S. Trade Representative
held consultations with the Department
and the appropriate congressional
committees with respect to this
determination. On August 31, 2007, in
accordance with sections 129(b)(4) and
129(c)(1)(B) of the URAA, the U.S.
Trade Representative directed the
Department to implement this
determination.
Nature of the Proceedings
Section 129 of the URAA governs the
nature and effect of determinations
issued by the Department to implement
findings by WTO dispute settlement
panels and the Appellate Body.
Specifically, section 129(b)(2) provides
that ‘‘notwithstanding any provision of
the Tariff Act of 1930,’’ within 180 days
of a written request from the U.S. Trade
Representative, the Department shall
issue a determination that would render
its actions not inconsistent with an
adverse finding of a WTO panel or the
Appellate Body. See 19 U.S.C.
3538(b)(2). The Statement of
Administrative Action accompanying
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act,
H.R. Rep. No. 103–316, Vol. 1, 103d
Cong. (1994) (SAA), reprinted in 1994
U.S.C.C.A.N. 4040, variously refers to
such a determination by the Department
as a ‘‘new,’’ ‘‘second,’’ and ‘‘different’’
determination. See SAA at 1025, 1027;
19 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 4313–14. After
consulting with the Department and the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54641
appropriate congressional committees,
the U.S. Trade Representative may
direct the Department to implement, in
whole or in part, the new determination
made under section 129.
See 19 U.S.C. 3538(b)(4). Pursuant to
section 129(c), the new determination
shall apply with respect to unliquidated
entries of the subject merchandise that
are entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date on which the U.S. Trade
Representative directs the Department
to implement the new determination.
See 19 U.S.C. 3538(c). The new
determination is subject to judicial
review separate and apart from judicial
review of the Department’s original
determination. See 19 U.S.C.
1516a(a)(2)(B)(vii).
Analysis of Comments Received
The issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs submitted by interested
parties to this proceeding are addressed
in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is on file in the Central
Records Unit (CRU), room B–099 of the
Department of Commerce main building
and can be accessed directly at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content. A list of the issues addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum is
appended to this notice.
Final Dumping Margins
The margin for TKAST decreases from
11.23 percent to 2.11 percent. The allothers rate changes from 11.23 percent
to 2.11 percent.
Cash Deposit and Continuation of the
Suspension of Liquidation
On August 31, 2007, in accordance
with sections 129(b)(4) and 129(c)(1)(B)
of the URAA, the U.S. Trade
Representative, after consulting with the
Department and Congress, directed the
Department to implement this
determination.
Therefore, we will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
continue to suspend liquidation of all
entries of subject merchandise from all
exporters or producers. CBP shall
continue to require a cash deposit equal
to the estimated amount by which the
normal value exceeds the U.S. price.
The suspension of liquidation
instructions will remain in effect until
further notice. The Section 129
Determination all-others rate will be the
new cash deposit rate for all exporters
of subject merchandise for whom the
Department has not calculated an
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
54642
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 26, 2007 / Notices
individual rate, which is 2.11 percent.
The cash deposit rates will remain
unchanged for those companies whose
cash deposit rates since the original
investigation have been superseded by
administrative reviews.
This Section 129 Determination is
issued and published in accordance
with section 129(c)(2)(A) of the URAA.
See 19 U.S.C. 3538(c)(2)(A).
Dated: September 20, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix I—Issues Raised in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Clerical Error Allegations.
Comment 2: Whether the Department Has the
Authority to Implement the WTO
Appellate Body Decision.
Comment 3: The Court of International Trade
Remand.
[FR Doc. E7–18991 Filed 9–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Federal Consistency Appeal by Mill
River Pipeline, LLC
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (Commerce).
ACTION: Notice of appeal.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This announcement provides
notice that Mill River Pipeline, LLC
(Mill River) has filed an administrative
appeal with the Department of
Commerce asking that the Secretary
override the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts’ objection to Mill River’s
proposed natural gas pipeline, which is
part of a proposed liquefied natural gas
terminal to be constructed in Fall River,
Massachusetts.
ADDRESSES: Materials from the appeal
record will be available at the NOAA
Office of General Counsel for Ocean
Services, 1305 East-West Highway,
Room 6111, Silver Spring, MD 20910
and on the following Web site: https://
www.ogc.doc.gov/czma.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brett Grosko, Attorney-Advisor, NOAA
Office of General Counsel, 301–713–
7384.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Notice of Appeal
Mill River Pipeline, LLC (Mill River)
filed a notice of appeal with the
Secretary of Commerce pursuant to the
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Sep 25, 2007
Jkt 211001
(CZMA), 16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq., and
implementing regulations found at 15
CFR part 930, subpart H. Mill River
appealed an objection raised by the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
relative to the proposed construction of
a liquefied natural gas pipeline, which
is part of a proposed liquefied natural
gas terminal to be constructed in Fall
River, Massachusetts.
Under the CZMA, the Secretary may
override Massachusetts’ objection on
grounds that the project is consistent
with the objectives or purposes of the
CZMA, or necessary in the interest of
national security. To make the
determination that the proposed activity
is ‘‘consistent with the objectives or
purposes’’ of the CZMA, the Secretary
must find that: (1) The proposed activity
furthers the national interest as
articulated in sections 302 or 303 of the
CZMA, in a significant or substantial
manner; (2) the adverse effects of the
proposed activity do not outweigh its
contribution to the national interest,
when those effects are considered
separately or cumulatively; and (3) no
reasonable alternative is available that
would permit the activity to be
conducted in a manner consistent with
the enforceable policies of
Massachusetts’ coastal management
program. 15 CFR 930.121. To make the
determination that the proposed activity
is ‘‘necessary in the interest of national
security,’’ the Secretary must find that a
national defense or other national
security interest would be significantly
impaired were the proposed activity not
permitted to go forward as proposed. 15
CFR 930.122.
II. Appeal Documents
NOAA intends to provide the public
with access to all publicly available
materials and related documents
comprising the appeal record during
business hours, at the NOAA Office of
General Counsel for Ocean Services.
For additional information about this
appeal contact Brett Grosko, 301–713–
7384.
[Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog No.
11.419 Coastal Zone Management Program
Assistance.]
Dated: September 21, 2007.
Joel La Bissonniere,
Assistant General Counsel for Ocean Services.
[FR Doc. E7–19047 Filed 9–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–08–P
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Federal Consistency Appeal by
Weaver’s Cove Energy, LLC
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (Commerce).
ACTION: Notice of appeal.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This announcement provides
notice that Weaver’s Cove Energy, LLC
(Weaver’s Cove) has filed an
administrative appeal with the
Department of Commerce asking that
the Secretary override the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
objection to Weaver’s Cove’s proposed
liquefied natural gas terminal in Fall
River, Massachusetts.
ADDRESSES: Materials from the appeal
record will be available at the NOAA
Office of General Counsel for Ocean
Services, 1305 East-West Highway,
Room 6111, Silver Spring, MD 20910
and on the following Web site: https://
www.ogc.doc.gov/czma.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brett Grosko, Attorney-Advisor, NOAA
Office of the General Counsel, 301–713–
7384.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Notice of Appeal
Weaver’s Cove Energy, LLC (Weaver’s
Cove) filed a notice of appeal with the
Secretary of Commerce pursuant to the
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972
(CZMA), 16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq., and
implementing regulations found at 15
CFR part 930, subpart H. Weaver’s Cove
appealed an objection raised by the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
relative to the proposed construction of
a liquefied natural gas terminal in Fall
River, Massachusetts.
Under the CZMA, the Secretary may
override Massachusetts’ objection on
grounds that the project is consistent
with the objectives or purposes of the
CZMA, or necessary in the interest of
national security. To make the
determination that the proposed activity
is ‘‘consistent with the objectives or
purposes’’ of the CZMA, the Secretary
must find that: (1) The proposed activity
furthers the national interest as
articulated in sections 302 or 303 of the
CZMA, in a significant or substantial
manner; (2) the adverse effects of the
proposed activity do not outweigh its
contribution to the national interest,
when those effects are considered
separately or cumulatively; and (3) no
reasonable alternative is available that
would permit the activity to be
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54640-54642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-475-824]
Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in US-Zeroing
(EC); Notice of Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act: Antidumping Duty Order on Stainless Steel Sheet and
Strip in Coils From Italy
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 31, 2007, the U.S. Trade Representative instructed
the Department of Commerce (the Department) to implement the
Department's findings under section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements
Act (URAA) regarding the offsetting of dumped sales with non-dumped
sales in the above-referenced investigation involving average-to-
average transactions. The Department issued its finding on August 20,
2007, for stainless steel sheet and strip in coils from Italy (Italy
SSSS) for ThyssenKrupp Acciai Speciali Terni S.P.A. and ThyssenKrupp
AST USA, Inc. (collectively ``TKAST'').\1\ The Department hereby
implements that finding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On April 30, 2007, the Department implemented the findings
of the World Trade Organization (WTO) with respect to eleven
investigations challenged by the European Communities. For the
reasons detailed below, the final determination for stainless steel
sheet and strip in coils from Italy was not included in the April
30, 2007, final determinations. See Implementation of the Findings
of the WTO Panel in US-Zeroing (EC): Notice of Determinations Under
Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Revocations and
Partial Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders, 72 FR 25261
(May 4, 2007) (Implementation Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: The effective date of this determination is August 31, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel O'Brien, William Kovatch, or
Michael Rill, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1376, (202) 482-5052, or (202) 482-3058, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 54641]]
Background
On February 22, 2007, the Department initiated twelve proceedings
under section 129 of the URAA to implement the WTO dispute settlement
panel's report in United States--Laws, Regulations and Methodology for
Calculating Dumping Margins (``Zeroing'') (WT/DS294). See
Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in U.S. Zeroing (EC):
Notice of Initiation of Proceedings Under Section 129 of the URAA;
Opportunity to Request Administrative Protective Orders; and Proposed
Timetable and Procedures, 72 FR 9306 (March 1, 2007). In each
proceeding, the Department recalculated the weighted-average dumping
margin, applying the calculation methodology described in Antidumping
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin During
an Antidumping Investigation; Final Modification, 71 FR 77722 (December
27, 2006).
On February 26, 2007, the Department issued its preliminary
determinations and requested comments. See Memorandum from Stephen J.
Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary, to David M. Spooner, Assistant
Secretary, Regarding Section 129 Determinations: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Margins dated February 26, 2007 (Preliminary
Determination). TKAST, Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, Armco Inc., J&L
Specialty Steel, Inc., Washington Steel Division of Bethlehem Steel
Corporation, the United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO/CLC, the
Butler Armco Independent Union, and the Zanesville Armco Independent
Organization, Inc., (collectively, ``petitioners'') and the European
Union submitted case briefs with respect to Italy SSSS. TKAST and
petitioners submitted rebuttal briefs. In its comments to the
Department, TKAST alleged clerical errors in the Department's margin
calculation in the less-than-fair-value investigation and Preliminary
Determination. Because of these allegations, we placed the original
less-than-fair-value investigation record onto the record of this 129
proceeding and invited interested parties to provide comments on
computational errors that may have been present in the Department's
recalculation of the weighted-average dumping margin with respect to
TKAST. See the Department's Memo to the File from Angelica Mendoza,
Program Manager, and Stephen Bailey, Case Analyst, through Richard
Weible, Office Director, AD/CVD Operations/OFC 7, to the File, titled
Placement of Record from the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation onto
the Record of the Section 129 Determination, dated April 19, 2007. The
Department also held two public hearings at the request of TKAST.
Because of the two hearings, and the placement of the original less-
than-fair-value investigation record onto the record of this 129
proceeding, the Department was delayed in issuing its final
determination with respect to Italy SSSS.
On August 20, 2007, the Department issued its final results for the
Section 129 Determination with respect to Italy SSSS. See the
Department's Memo to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration from Gary Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Import Administration, titled Issues and Decision Memorandum for
the Final Results of the Section 129 Determination, dated August 20,
2007 (Issues and Decision Memorandum). On August 28, 2007, TKAST
submitted an allegation of ministerial errors and on August 31, 2007,
petitioners filed their response to TKAST's ministerial error
submission. The Department intends to address all ministerial error
comments in a subsequent memorandum.
On August 24, and August 28, 2007, consistent with section
129(b)(3) of the URAA, the U.S. Trade Representative held consultations
with the Department and the appropriate congressional committees with
respect to this determination. On August 31, 2007, in accordance with
sections 129(b)(4) and 129(c)(1)(B) of the URAA, the U.S. Trade
Representative directed the Department to implement this determination.
Nature of the Proceedings
Section 129 of the URAA governs the nature and effect of
determinations issued by the Department to implement findings by WTO
dispute settlement panels and the Appellate Body. Specifically, section
129(b)(2) provides that ``notwithstanding any provision of the Tariff
Act of 1930,'' within 180 days of a written request from the U.S. Trade
Representative, the Department shall issue a determination that would
render its actions not inconsistent with an adverse finding of a WTO
panel or the Appellate Body. See 19 U.S.C. 3538(b)(2). The Statement of
Administrative Action accompanying the Uruguay Round Agreements Act,
H.R. Rep. No. 103-316, Vol. 1, 103d Cong. (1994) (SAA), reprinted in
1994 U.S.C.C.A.N. 4040, variously refers to such a determination by the
Department as a ``new,'' ``second,'' and ``different'' determination.
See SAA at 1025, 1027; 19 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 4313-14. After consulting
with the Department and the appropriate congressional committees, the
U.S. Trade Representative may direct the Department to implement, in
whole or in part, the new determination made under section 129.
See 19 U.S.C. 3538(b)(4). Pursuant to section 129(c), the new
determination shall apply with respect to unliquidated entries of the
subject merchandise that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date on which the U.S. Trade Representative
directs the Department to implement the new determination. See 19
U.S.C. 3538(c). The new determination is subject to judicial review
separate and apart from judicial review of the Department's original
determination. See 19 U.S.C. 1516a(a)(2)(B)(vii).
Analysis of Comments Received
The issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by
interested parties to this proceeding are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is on file in the Central Records Unit (CRU),
room B-099 of the Department of Commerce main building and can be
accessed directly at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical
in content. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is appended to this notice.
Final Dumping Margins
The margin for TKAST decreases from 11.23 percent to 2.11 percent.
The all-others rate changes from 11.23 percent to 2.11 percent.
Cash Deposit and Continuation of the Suspension of Liquidation
On August 31, 2007, in accordance with sections 129(b)(4) and
129(c)(1)(B) of the URAA, the U.S. Trade Representative, after
consulting with the Department and Congress, directed the Department to
implement this determination.
Therefore, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to continue to suspend liquidation of all entries of subject
merchandise from all exporters or producers. CBP shall continue to
require a cash deposit equal to the estimated amount by which the
normal value exceeds the U.S. price. The suspension of liquidation
instructions will remain in effect until further notice. The Section
129 Determination all-others rate will be the new cash deposit rate for
all exporters of subject merchandise for whom the Department has not
calculated an
[[Page 54642]]
individual rate, which is 2.11 percent. The cash deposit rates will
remain unchanged for those companies whose cash deposit rates since the
original investigation have been superseded by administrative reviews.
This Section 129 Determination is issued and published in
accordance with section 129(c)(2)(A) of the URAA. See 19 U.S.C.
3538(c)(2)(A).
Dated: September 20, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix I--Issues Raised in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Clerical Error Allegations.
Comment 2: Whether the Department Has the Authority to Implement the
WTO Appellate Body Decision.
Comment 3: The Court of International Trade Remand.
[FR Doc. E7-18991 Filed 9-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P