In the Matter of Certain Audio Processing Integrated Circuits and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Determination To Rescind a Limited Exclusion Order, 53263 [E7-18206]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 18, 2007 / Notices
must provide their own transportation
and lunch. The RAC will resume its
meeting at 8 a.m. on October 27 in the
Holiday Inn Express meeting room.
Time for public comment is reserved
from 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on October
27.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BLM Hollister Field Office Manager
Rick Cooper, (831) 630–5010; or BLM
Central California Public Affairs Officer
David Christy, (916) 985–4474.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
twelve-member Central California RAC
advises the Secretary of the Interior,
through the BLM, on a variety of public
land issues associated with public land
management in Central California. At
this meeting, agenda items include
discussion of issues at Fort Ord and at
the Clear Creek Management Area. The
RAC will also hear status reports from
BLM managers for the Folsom, Hollister,
Bakersfield and Bishop field offices. The
meeting is open to the public. The
public may present written comments to
the RAC, and time will be allocated for
hearing public comments. Depending on
the number of persons wishing to
comment and the time available, the
time for individual oral comments may
be limited. Individuals who plan to
attend and need special assistance such
as sign language interpretation or other
reasonable accommodations should
contact the BLM as indicated above.
Charge Code: CA 110–1820–XX.
Dated: September 6, 2007.
David Christy,
Public Affairs Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–18313 Filed 9–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1820–XX–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–538]
In the Matter of Certain Audio
Processing Integrated Circuits and
Products Containing Same; Notice of
Commission Determination To Rescind
a Limited Exclusion Order
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to rescind
the limited exclusion order issued in the
above-captioned investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint A. Gerdine, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E. Street, SW.,
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:28 Sep 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2310. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E.
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on April 18, 2005, based on a complaint
filed on behalf of SigmaTel, Inc.
(‘‘SigmaTel’’) of Austin, Texas. 70
Federal Register 20172. The complaint
alleged violations of section 337 (19
U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain audio
processing integrated circuits and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of claim 10 of U.S. Patent
No. 6,137,279 (‘‘the ’279 patent’’) and
claim 13 of U.S. Patent No. 6,633,187
(‘‘the ’187 patent’’). The complaint
named a single respondent, Actions
Semiconductor Co., Ltd. of Guangdong,
China (‘‘Actions’’). The complaint
further alleged that an industry in the
United States exists, as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
On July 8, 2005, the Commission
determined not to review an initial
determination (‘‘ID’’) granting
SigmaTel’s motion to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation to
add allegations of infringement of the
previously asserted patents and to add
an allegation of a violation of section
337 by reason of infringement of claims
1, 6, 9, and 13 of U.S. Patent No.
6,366,522 (‘‘the ’522 patent’’). On
October 31, 2005, the Commission
determined not to review an ID granting
complainant’s motion to terminate the
investigation as to the ’279 patent.
On March 2006, the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued
his final ID and recommended
determination on remedy and bonding.
The ALJ found a violation of section 337
by reason of infringement of claim 13 of
the ’187 patent by Actions’ accused
product families 207X, 208X, and 209X,
and of claims 1, 6, 9, and 13 of the ’522
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53263
patent by Actions’ accused product
families 208X and 209X.
On May 5, 2006, the Commission
determined to review the ID and
requested submissions regarding the
issues under review as well as remedy,
the public interest and bonding. On
September 15, 2006, the Commission
determined that there is a violation of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and issued a limited
exclusion order prohibiting the
importation of Actions’ infringing
products.
On August 20, 2007, complainant
SigmaTel and respondent Actions filed
a joint petition to rescind the remedial
order under Commission Rule
210.76(a)(1) on the basis of a settlement
agreement between the parties. The
parties asserted that their settlement
agreement constituted ‘‘changed
conditions of fact or law’’ sufficient to
justify rescission of the order under
Commission Rule 210.76(a)(1), 19 CFR
210.76(a)(1). The Commission
investigative attorney filed a response in
support of the petition on August 29,
2007.
Having reviewed the parties’
submissions, the Commission has
determined that the settlement
agreement satisfies the requirement of
Commission Rule 210.76(a)(1), 19 CFR
210.76(a)(1), that there be changed
conditions of fact or law. The
Commission therefore has issued an
order rescinding the limited exclusion
order previously issued in this
investigation.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) and section
210.76(a)(1) of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.76(a)(1)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 11, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–18206 Filed 9–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1124–0006]
National Security Division; Agency
Information Collection Activities:
Proposed Collection; Comments
Requested
60-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: Exhibit A to
Registration Statement (Foreign Agents).
ACTION:
The Department of Justice (DOJ),
National Security Division (NSD), will
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 53263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-18206]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-538]
In the Matter of Certain Audio Processing Integrated Circuits and
Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Determination To Rescind
a Limited Exclusion Order
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to rescind the limited exclusion order issued
in the above-captioned investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint A. Gerdine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E. Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2310. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E. Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on April 18, 2005, based on a complaint filed on behalf of SigmaTel,
Inc. (``SigmaTel'') of Austin, Texas. 70 Federal Register 20172. The
complaint alleged violations of section 337 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after importation of certain audio
processing integrated circuits and products containing same by reason
of infringement of claim 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,137,279 (``the '279
patent'') and claim 13 of U.S. Patent No. 6,633,187 (``the '187
patent''). The complaint named a single respondent, Actions
Semiconductor Co., Ltd. of Guangdong, China (``Actions''). The
complaint further alleged that an industry in the United States exists,
as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
On July 8, 2005, the Commission determined not to review an initial
determination (``ID'') granting SigmaTel's motion to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation to add allegations of
infringement of the previously asserted patents and to add an
allegation of a violation of section 337 by reason of infringement of
claims 1, 6, 9, and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 6,366,522 (``the '522
patent''). On October 31, 2005, the Commission determined not to review
an ID granting complainant's motion to terminate the investigation as
to the '279 patent.
On March 2006, the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'')
issued his final ID and recommended determination on remedy and
bonding. The ALJ found a violation of section 337 by reason of
infringement of claim 13 of the '187 patent by Actions' accused product
families 207X, 208X, and 209X, and of claims 1, 6, 9, and 13 of the
'522 patent by Actions' accused product families 208X and 209X.
On May 5, 2006, the Commission determined to review the ID and
requested submissions regarding the issues under review as well as
remedy, the public interest and bonding. On September 15, 2006, the
Commission determined that there is a violation of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and issued a limited exclusion order
prohibiting the importation of Actions' infringing products.
On August 20, 2007, complainant SigmaTel and respondent Actions
filed a joint petition to rescind the remedial order under Commission
Rule 210.76(a)(1) on the basis of a settlement agreement between the
parties. The parties asserted that their settlement agreement
constituted ``changed conditions of fact or law'' sufficient to justify
rescission of the order under Commission Rule 210.76(a)(1), 19 CFR
210.76(a)(1). The Commission investigative attorney filed a response in
support of the petition on August 29, 2007.
Having reviewed the parties' submissions, the Commission has
determined that the settlement agreement satisfies the requirement of
Commission Rule 210.76(a)(1), 19 CFR 210.76(a)(1), that there be
changed conditions of fact or law. The Commission therefore has issued
an order rescinding the limited exclusion order previously issued in
this investigation.
This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) and section 210.76(a)(1) of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.76(a)(1)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 11, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-18206 Filed 9-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P