Woodside Natural Gas, Inc. OceanWay Secure Energy Liquefied Natural Gas Deepwater Port License Application; Preparation of Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, 52607-52611 [E7-18130]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Notices
U.S.-flag vessels in that business, a
waiver will not be granted. Comments
should refer to the docket number of
this notice and the vessel name in order
for MARAD to properly consider the
comments. Comments should also state
the commenter’s interest in the waiver
application, and address the waiver
criteria given in § 388.4 of MARAD’s
regulations at 46 CFR part 388.
By order of the Maritime Administrator.
Daron T. Threet,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–18129 Filed 9–13–07; 8:45 am]
Submit comments on or before
October 15, 2007.
[USCG–2007–26844]
DATES:
Comments should refer to
docket number MARAD–2007–29216.
Written comments may be submitted by
hand or by mail to the Docket Clerk,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. You may also
send comments electronically via the
Internet at
https://dmses.dot.gov/submit/. All
comments will become part of this
docket and will be available for
inspection and copying at the above
address between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
E.T., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. An electronic version
of this document and all documents
entered into this docket is available on
the World Wide Web at https://
dms.dot.gov.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joann Spittle, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W21–203,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone 202–
366–5979.
As
described by the applicant the intended
service of the vessel OCEAN SPIRIT is:
Intended Use: ‘‘Charters for
sightseeing, burial at sea and similar.’’
Geographic Region: ‘‘Southern
California and Baha, Mexico.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Dated: September 10, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:44 Sep 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
Woodside Natural Gas, Inc. OceanWay
Secure Energy Liquefied Natural Gas
Deepwater Port License Application;
Preparation of Environmental Impact
Statement/Environmental Impact
Report
Maritime Administration, DOT.
Notice of intent; notice of public
meeting; request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Maritime Administration
and the U.S. Coast Guard announce the
intent to prepare an environmental
impact statement/environmental impact
report (EIS/EIR). The application
describes a project located in the
Federal waters of the Santa Monica
Basin, approximately 27 miles
southwest of Los Angeles International
Airport.
The EIS/EIR will be prepared with the
City of Los Angeles (City) as a
cooperating agency in the
environmental review with the Coast
Guard since the applicant has also filed
an application for lease/franchise of
offshore submerged City lands and an
onshore pipeline franchise for the
subsea pipelines through City waters
and a pipeline through the City. The
EIS/EIR will meet the requirements of
both the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) and the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Publication of this notice begins a 30
day scoping process that will assist in
the identification and determination of
the environmental issues to be
addressed in the EIS/EIR. This notice
requests public participation in the
scoping process and provides
information regarding how to
participate in the process. It announces
a public meeting to be held in
connection with the EIS/EIR; requests
public comment on the scope of the EIS/
EIR; and also serves as a notice of intent
(NOI) and notice of preparation (NOP)
for the purposes of California law.
DATES: The Coast Guard, Maritime
Administration, and the City will
conduct an informational open house,
followed by a public scoping meeting
Wednesday, September 26, 2007 to
receive oral or written comments. The
informational open house will run from
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52607
4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m. followed by a public
meeting from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. The
time may be extended depending on the
number of speakers. Comments or
related material must be received by
October 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: The open house and public
meeting will be held at the Los Angeles
Airport Marriott, 5855 West Century
Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90045; (310)
641–5700. Please Note: All attendees are
requested to bring their hotel parking
tickets inside the hotel for parking
validation.
The public docket for USCG–2007–
26844 is maintained by the Department
of Transportation, Docket Management
Facility, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
West Building, Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Docket contents are available for public
inspection and copying at this address
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Facility’s telephone number is 202–
366–9329, the fax number is 202–493–
2251, and the Web site for electronic
submissions or for electronic access to
docket contents is https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding the proposed
Project, the license application process,
or the EIS/EIR process may be directed
to Roddy Bachman, U.S. Coast Guard,
telephone: (202) 367–1451, e-mail:
(Roddy.C.Bachman@uscg.mil), or Linda
Moore, City of Los Angeles, telephone:
(213) 485–5751, e-mail:
(Linda.Moore@lacity.org).
Questions regarding viewing or
submitting materials to the docket may
be directed to, Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations,
(202–493–0402).
The DOT Docket Management System
also chronologically contains the
application and related correspondence,
public meeting transcripts, will contain
the Draft and the Final EIS/EIR, and will
contain all comments submitted
whether at public meetings or submitted
directly. This can be accessed at
https://dms.dot.gov, and search for
docket number 26844.
Information pertaining to the
proposed OceanWay Deepwater Port
Project is also available online with the
City of Los Angeles at: https://
eng.lacity.org/techdocs/emg/
Environmental_Review_Documents.htm.
This public notice may be requested
from the City of Los Angeles in an
alternative format such as Spanish
translation, audiotape, large print, or
Braille. Contact the City of Los Angeles
at the City project Web site listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
52608
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Notices
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Public Meeting and Open House
The Coast Guard, Maritime
Administration, and City plan to
conduct an informational open house
and public meeting related to
preparation of an EIS/EIR for the
proposed Project. The open house will
be an informal opportunity to ask
questions and receive information
regarding the Project. The public
scoping meeting will be structured to
provide the public with an opportunity
to present comments regarding the
approach and conduct of the
environmental analysis. Comments will
help us identify and refine the scope of
the environmental issues to be
addressed in the EIS/EIR.
Speaker registrations will be available
at the door. Speakers at the public
scoping meeting will be recognized in
the following order: Elected officials,
public agencies, individuals or groups
in the sign-up order, and anyone else
who wishes to speak. Speakers may be
asked to limit their oral comments to
three (3) minutes in order to afford
everyone an opportunity to speak and
the meeting time may be extended.
Speakers must identify themselves and
any organization represented, by name.
Remarks will be recorded or transcribed
for inclusion in the public docket.
Public docket materials will be made
available to the public on the Docket
Management Facility’s Docket
Management System (DMS). See
‘‘Request for Comments’’ for
information about the DMS and your
rights under the Privacy Act.
Written comments will also be
accepted. You may submit written
material at the public meeting, either in
place of or in addition to speaking.
Written material must include your
name and address, and will be included
in the public docket.
Please notify Roddy Bachman, U.S.
Coast Guard, telephone: (202) 367–1451,
e-mail: (Roddy.C.Bachman@uscg.mil) as
soon as possible, but at least three (3)
business days before the scheduled
meeting, if translation of written
materials is required.
A court reporter will also be available
during the open house to transcribe oral
comments if you wish to speak at the
meeting.
All public scoping meeting spaces
will be wheelchair-accessible.
Individuals may request special
accommodations for the public scoping
meetings, such as real-time translation.
Contact the Coast Guard or City of Los
Angeles (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT) if special accommodations are
required. Requests should be made as
soon as possible but at least three (3)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:44 Sep 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
business days before the scheduled
meeting. Include the name and
telephone number of the contact person,
the timelines for requesting
accommodations, and a TDD number
that can be used by individuals with
hearing impairments.
on the DMS Web site, or the Department
of Transportation Privacy Act Statement
that appeared in the Federal Register on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477). You may
view docket submissions at the Docket
Management Facility (see ADDRESSES),
or electronically on the DMS Web site.
Request for Comments
The Coast Guard, Maritime
Administration, and the City request
submittal of comments and related
material regarding this notice using one
of the methods described below. The
Coast Guard, Maritime Administration,
and the City most particularly seek
comments that identify potentially
significant impacts, alternatives, or
mitigation measures that should be
taken into account in determining the
scope of the EIS/EIR.
We request public comments or other
relevant information on environmental
issues related to the proposed
deepwater port. The public meeting is
not the only opportunity to comment. In
addition to or in place of attending the
meeting, comments may be submitted to
the Docket Management Facility or City
of Los Angeles during the public
comment period (see DATES). The Coast
Guard, Maritime Administration, and
City will consider all comments and
material received during the comment
period. It is not necessary to present
comments more than once. Comments
need not be submitted to multiple
agencies; all comments received will be
shared amongst agencies.
Submissions to the DOT Docket
Management System should include:
• Docket number USCG–2007–26844.
• Your name and address.
• Your reasons for making each
comment or for bringing information to
our attention.
Submit comments or material using
only one of the following methods:
• Electronic submission to DMS,
https://dms.dot.gov.
• Fax, mail, or hand delivery to the
Docket Management Facility (see
ADDRESSES). Faxed or hand delivered
submissions must be unbound, no larger
than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, and suitable for
copying and electronic scanning. If you
mail your submission and want to know
when it reaches the Facility, include a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope.
Regardless of the method used for
submitting comments or material, all
submissions will be posted, without
change, to the DMS Web site (https://
dms.dot.gov), and will include any
personal information provided.
Therefore, submitting this information
makes it public. You may wish to read
the Privacy Act notice that is available
Background
A notice of application for the
proposed OceanWay DWP was
published in the Federal Register (FR)
on September 7, 2007 (72 FR 51488).
Consult that notice for additional
information regarding the proposed
DWP, the ship-to-ship transfer locations,
the offshore and onshore pipelines and
the receiving and custody transfer
facility. The ‘‘Summary of the
Application/Proposed Action’’ from that
publication is reprinted below for your
convenience.
Congress first authorized DWPs in
1974. Federal law (33 United States
Code [U.S.C.] 1501 et seq.) defines a
DWP as any fixed or floating manmade
structure other than a vessel, or any
group of such structures, that is located
beyond State seaward boundaries, and
that is used or intended for use as a port
or terminal for the transportation,
storage, or further handling of oil or
natural gas for transportation to any
state. All DWPs require a license
granted by the Maritime Administrator
based on an application process
administered by the Coast Guard, in
coordination with the Maritime
Administration. Part of that process
involves assessment of the natural and
human environmental impacts from the
port, in compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332). The Maritime
Administration and Coast Guard are the
lead Federal agencies for NEPA
compliance. The Coast Guard, in
cooperation with the Maritime
Administration, determines the scope
and completes the environmental
review of the proposed project. This
includes consultation with States that
are adjacent to the proposed port. For
the purposes of the OceanWay
deepwater port application, California is
an adjacent coastal state. The Coast
Guard and Maritime Administration
have determined that compliance with
the NEPA requires preparation of an
EIS.
The City has determined that the
proposed port would require a City
license/franchise for subsea pipelines
through City waters to deliver the
natural gas to shore, and a new
franchise and other approvals for the
onshore pipeline and receiving and
custody transfer station (RCTS) to
deliver the natural gas into the existing
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Notices
pipeline system, and that compliance
with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) requires
preparation of an EIR. Because of the
many similarities between an EIS and
an EIR, the Coast Guard, Maritime
Administration and the City have agreed
to cooperate in preparing a single
document that satisfies both the NEPA
and the CEQA.
The EIS/EIR will be consistent with
the Deepwater Port Act (DWPA) of 1974,
as amended (33 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.); the
NEPA (Section 102[2][c]), as
implemented by Council on
Environmental Quality regulations (40
Code of Federal Regulations 1500 to
1508); and the CEQA (California Public
Resources Code 21000 et seq.) as
implemented by the State CEQA
Guidelines (14 California Code of
Regulations 15000 et seq.). The
environmental review and analysis will
be completed according to the timeline
prescribed by the DWPA, which
requires a decision within 356 days. The
period to complete all NEPA/CEQA
documents is approximately 240 days.
This timeline will govern the activities
related to the processing of the license
application and the completion of all
NEPA and CEQA related actions needed
to support the decision regarding
whether to approve, approve with
conditions, or disapprove the proposed
license/lease/franchise.
This notice of intent is in compliance
with the requirements of the NEPA
regulations and also serves as the notice
of preparation as required by CEQA. It
briefly describes the proposed action
and possible alternatives and our
proposed scoping process. Address any
questions about the proposed action, the
scoping process, or the EIS/EIR to the
Coast Guard or City of Los Angeles (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Proposed Action and Alternatives
The proposed action requiring
environmental review is the Federal
licensing of the proposed deepwater
port described in ‘‘Summary of the
Application/Proposed Action/Project’’
below. The alternatives to licensing the
proposed port are: (1) Licensing with
conditions (including conditions
designed to mitigate environmental
impact), and (2) denying the
application, which for purposes of
environmental review is the ‘‘no-action’’
alternative.
The proposed action requiring
environmental review by the City of Los
Angeles is the granting of a pipeline
franchise and appurtenant approvals for
the same project.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:44 Sep 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Scoping Process
Public scoping is an early and open
process for identifying and determining
the scope of issues addressed in the EIS/
EIR. Scoping begins with this notice,
continues through the public comment
period and ends when the Coast Guard,
Maritime Administration and the City
have:
• Invited the participation of Federal,
State, and local agencies, any affected
Indian tribes, the applicant, and other
interested persons;
• Determined the actions,
alternatives, and impacts described in
40 CFR 1508.25;
• Identified and eliminated from
detailed study those issues that are not
significant or that have been covered
elsewhere;
• Allocated responsibility for
preparing EIS/EIR components;
• Indicated any related
environmental assessments or
environmental impact statements that
are not part of the EIS;
• Identified other relevant
environmental review and consultation
requirements;
• Indicated the relationship between
timing of the environmental review and
other aspects of the application process;
and
• At the Federal agencies’ discretion,
exercised the options provided in 40
CFR 1501.7 (b).
Once the scoping process is complete,
the Coast Guard and City of Los Angeles
will prepare a draft EIS/EIR (DEIS/
DEIR), and publish a Federal Register
notice announcing its public
availability. To receive that notice,
please contact those identified in (FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). An
opportunity to review and comment on
the draft EIS/EIR will be provided. The
Coast Guard, Maritime Administration
and City will consider those comments
in the preparation of the final EIS/EIR
(FEIS/FEIR). As with the draft EIS, we
will announce the availability of the
FEIS/FEIR and once again allow an
opportunity for review and comment.
Availability of EIS/EIR
A notice of availability (NOA) will be
published in the Federal Register when
the DEIS/DEIR is available, and the City
will file a notice of completion with the
California State Clearinghouse and the
Los Angeles County Clerk and will
publish a notice of availability in the
‘‘City of Los Angeles Environmental
Notices’’ section of the Los Angeles
Times. The DEIS/DEIR in hardcopy or
electronic format will be distributed to
agencies, local public libraries and
interested parties that have requested
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52609
copies. Anyone who wishes to comment
on the draft report will be provided with
an opportunity to review the DEIS/DEIR
and to offer comments on the
environmental effects of the proposed
project. Comments received during the
DEIS/DEIR review period will be
available in the public docket and
responded to in the FEIS/FEIR. An NOA
of the FEIS/FEIR will also be published
in the Federal Register, and the City
will issue notices of availability and
completion. Additional public meetings
will be held after the draft and final
documents are published.
Summary of the Application/Proposed
Action/Project
Woodside Natural Gas proposes to
construct, own, and operate a deepwater
port with associated ship-to-ship
transfer (STS) location(s) and single
point mooring (SPM) buoys for the
receiving of regasification liquefied
natural gas carriers (RLNGCs), offshore
and onshore natural gas pipelines and a
receiving and custody transfer facility
(RCTS) to deliver natural gas with an
annualized rate of 0.4 billion cubic feet
per day (bcf/d) and a peak of 1.1 bcf/d
into the Southern California market on
initial development and an annualized
rate of 1.0 bcf/d and a peak of up to 1.6
bcf/d at full project development.
The deepwater port would be located
in the Federal waters of the Santa
Monica Basin, 21 miles from the nearest
point on the mainland of Southern
California, and 18 miles from the
western end of Santa Catalina Island,
approximately 27 miles southwest of
Los Angeles International Airport
(LAX), in a water depth of
approximately 3,000 feet. It would
consist of two single point mooring
(SPM) buoys that serve as cargo
discharge system connections for the
RLNGCs, a mooring/anchoring array,
four flexible risers that connect the
SPMs to four seafloor riser end
manifolds, two pipeline end manifolds
(PLEMs) and two parallel 24-inch
pipelines beginning on the seafloor at
the PLEMs beneath the SPM buoys and
continuing to shore. The SPMs would
be located approximately 5 nautical
miles (5.75 miles) outside established
shipping lanes (SPM NE: Latitude:
33°41′52″ N, Longitude: 118°48′33″ W
and SPM SW: Latitude: 33°39′58″ N,
Longitude: 118°49′15″ W).
Woodside has proposed three ship-toship transfer locations ranging from
approximately 35 to 90 nautical miles
(40 to 104 miles) from shore and 55 to
111 nautical miles (63 to 128 miles)
from the port where each RLNGC is
expected to receive LNG cargo at sea
from conventional LNG carriers
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
52610
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Notices
(LNGCs): STS1 Santa Rosa (Latitude
33°39′ N, Longitude 119°56′30″ W),
STS2 Inshore San Clemente (Latitude
33°05′ N, Longitude 118°10′ W) and
STS3 Skaugen Offshore (Latitude 32°15′
N, Longitude 120°0′ W). Only one
transfer location would be used at a
time. The RLNGCs, with storage
capacity of 224,000 m3 of LNG would be
capable of receiving LNGCs with storage
capacities of up to 216,000 m3 of LNG.
As proposed, LNG would be delivered
from overseas by LNGCs and transferred
to a Woodside RLNGC at one of the
three STS locations. The RLNGC would
then be sailed and moored to a SPM,
where the LNG would be regasified into
natural gas and delivered to shore via
two new parallel 24-inch pipelines. The
RLNGC would then return to a STS
location.
The RLNGCs would use a turret
system with the SPMs to allow the
RLNGC to weathervane (rotate) around
the buoy. Onboard utilities and systems
associated with RLNGC operations
would include electric power generation
and distribution, instrumentation and
controls, and fire and safety systems.
The RLNGC would include all marine
systems, communications, navigation
aids and equipment necessary to safely
conduct RLNGC carrier operations
receive and vaporize the product.
The RLNGCs would use a forced draft
ambient air LNG vaporization system
employing a combination of
intermediate fluid and direct ambient
air with heat provided by ambient air
called the Woodside Hybrid Air
Vaporization (WHAV) concept.
Natural gas would be delivered
onshore via two 24-inch parallel
pipelines, approximately 35 miles in
length. These pipelines would come
onshore on the north end of LAX at
Dockweiler Beach. It is proposed that
horizontal directional drilling be used to
install the pipelines beneath land and
seabed in offshore City waters and
underneath the beach and adjacent
dunes from a point about 1000 feet
inland from the high tide mark just east
of Vista del Mar on LAX property.
Woodside would lease/franchise from
the City a 300 foot wide corridor on
submerged City lands out to the 3
nautical mile (3.45 mile) offshore limit
of the City boundary. On-shore
pipelines would be constructed on Cityowned land from the high tide line to
Pershing Drive, passing under the beach
and the El Segundo Dunes, and
underground through City streets. The
route would include Westchester
Parkway/Arbor Vitae Street, then south
on Bellanca Avenue to the receiving and
custody transfer station (RCTS) and
adjacent Inert Gas Injection Facility
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:44 Sep 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
(IGIF) located at 5651 96th Street, Los
Angeles, about 4 miles inland. A single
36-inch pipeline would run
approximately a quarter of a mile back
north on Bellanca Avenue to Arbor
Vitae, then to the existing Southern
California Gas natural gas pipeline
infrastructure with Tie-in #1 at the
intersection of Aviation Boulevard and
Arbor Vitae Street. A second stage, with
development depending on demand,
may include additional pipelines and
tie-ins that are an approximate 11-mile
single 24-inch line from Tie-in #1 along
Arbor Vitae, Prairie, Manchester,
Firestone, and California to Tie-in #3 at
Santa Ana Street and Otis Avenue in
South Gate and approximate 1 mile
single 24-inch line from Manchester
Street to Central Ave to Tie-in #2 at the
intersection of S. Central Avenue and E.
Century Boulevard. These pipeline
routes include areas within the cities of
Los Angeles, Inglewood, and South
Gate. At full development, Southern
California Gas would own and operate
the system downstream of the RCTS.
The application also includes an
alternative DWP location in the Gulf of
Santa Catalina approximately 30 miles
from Huntington Beach at latitude
117°56′28.53″ west, longitude
33°13′24.88″ north with a 30-mile
pipeline running north to a shore
crossing at the AES power plant in
Huntington Beach. It would cross
through the cities of Huntington Beach,
Fountain Valley, Westminster, Garden
Grove, Santa Ana, and Orange. It would
be trenched through city streets
traveling north along Newland Street
towards Bolsa Avenue; turn east at
Bolsa Ave. (1st Street); turn north at the
OCTA Metrolink Right of Way and join
Lincoln Ave; east on Fairhaven Ave.;
north at Cambridge Street; and finally
west on Palm Ave., where it would
connect to the SCG tie-in in Orange.
Currently Identified Environmental
Issues
The NEPA and CEQA processes
require agencies to consider
environmental impacts that may result
from a proposed action, to inform the
public of potential impacts and
alternatives, and to facilitate public
involvement in the assessment process.
Additionally, CEQA requires measures
to avoid or lessen the significant
impacts of a project when granting an
approval, unless it finds certain benefits
of the project outweigh those significant
effects.
The EIS/EIR for the OceanWay DWP
will describe the nature and extent of
environmental impacts of the proposed
action and each alternative, and will
discuss appropriate mitigation measures
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for any adverse impacts. The EIS/EIR
will include, among other matters,
discussions of the purpose and need for
the proposed action, a description of
alternatives, a description of the affected
environment, an evaluation of the
environmental impacts of the proposed
action and alternatives, and
explanations of proposed mitigation.
The EIS/EIR will assess the impacts of
the alternatives on the natural and
human environment, including the noaction/no project alternative, which for
this Project would mean that the
Maritime Administration would not
approve the application or the City
would not approve the application for
the lease/franchise of the offshore
pipelines in City waters, the RCTS, and
onshore pipelines. Regardless of
geographic or other jurisdictional
boundaries, the Coast Guard, Maritime
Administration and the City will
consider the entire proposed Project.
Environmental issues that will require
detailed analysis include, but are not
necessarily limited to:
Aesthetics: Alteration of the view
shed by construction and operations.
Air Quality: Impacts on regional air
quality, including visibility and other
resources in sensitive Federal Class I
areas (e.g., Channel Islands National
Park).
Geological Resources and Soils:
Impacts on facilities from seismic
hazards; Impacts on onshore facilities
from liquefaction; and erosion and dust.
Hazardous/Toxic Materials and
Wastes: Impacts from HAZMAT spills
including petroleum, LNG, other
hydrocarbons, fuels, lubricant, urea,
paints, solvents, and sanitary or other
hazardous/toxic materials or waste.
Marine Transportation: Disruption in
marine transportation affecting existing
ship traffic to and from the ports of Los
Angeles and Long Beach or other ports;
potential navigational hazards to marine
traffic; and increase in tanker travel to
and from the single point mooring
locations that could impact existing
marine traffic.
Marine Biology: Vessels potentially
striking sea turtles and marine
mammals; crushing and displacement of
benthic communities during
construction; effects of ‘‘cold water’’
resulting from LNG release to marine
mammals; and effects of increases in
turbidity and changes in water quality,
lights, and noise.
Terrestrial and Freshwater Biology:
Impacts from construction or operation
on wetlands and other habitats, and
sensitive species, within the proposed
pipeline landing and corridor areas.
Recreation: Impacts on boating and
commercial and recreational fishing
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Notices
opportunities; recreational areas
potentially impacted by noise or dust
generated during construction; access to
the beach or ocean; and permanent and
temporary areas of restricted access
around the RLNGC.
Hazards and Risk/Safety: LNG
releases resulting in potential impacts
on third parties from fire, radiant
energy, or ignitable gas clouds (mainly
to passengers of small craft operating
near the RLNGC); and effects of pipeline
failures on humans, property, and
marine and terrestrial ecosystems. The
EIS/EIR will include an independently
prepared, site-specific risk assessment.
Noise: Potential increases in noise
levels due to project construction and
operation; and effects of noise on local
residents, recreational visitors,
passengers and crews on marine vessels,
and marine mammals.
Water Quality: Impacts from LNG or
spills, increases in turbidity, or
unearthing of contaminated sediments;
and increases in shoreline erosion
during construction and operation.
Environmental Justice: Potential
disproportionate effects on minority and
low-income populations within the
Project area. The EIS/EIR will identify
any relevant populations that might be
disproportionately affected by the
proposed Project.
Cultural Resources: Potential effects
on known and as yet unidentified
cultural resources, offshore and
onshore.
Energy and Mineral Resources:
Restriction of future availability of
exploitable oil and gas resources due to
infrastructure development and
restricted access.
Land Use and Traffic: Impacts to
existing land uses, especially in coastal
areas designated for recreational
purposes; impacts on marine resources
off the coast of Los Angeles, including
Catalina Island, the Channel Islands
National Marine Sanctuary and Channel
Islands National Park; and disruptions
to traffic use and patterns.
Population and Housing: Impacts on
the existing community character and
development, population, housing,
infrastructure and social services,
employment, and the regional economic
base.
Cumulative Impacts: The EIS/EIR will
evaluate the cumulative effects of the
project within each resource area
examined. These include the
incremental effects of past projects,
other current and proposed projects,
and reasonably foreseeable future
projects.
No-Action/No Project Alternative: The
EIS/EIR will examine the impacts of not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:44 Sep 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
approving the DWP license/lease/
franchise application.
Alternative Offshore Locations: The
EIS/EIR will consider an alternative
location in the vicinity of the proposed
Project and other locations adjacent to
the California coast.
Land-Based Alternatives: The
California Legislature mandated the
evaluation of land-based LNG sites.
Land-based alternatives previously
considered by California agencies will
be considered.
Alternative Technologies: Alternative
Project technologies, including open
rack vaporizers and a hybrid
vaporization system and alternative
facility designs will also be evaluated.
Alternative Pipeline Routes: The EIS/
EIR will also evaluate an alternative
submarine pipeline route and an
alternative onshore pipeline route.
Federal, State, and City Permit,
Approval, and Consultation: The major
federal and city permit, approval, and
consultation requirements for
OceanWay include, but are not
necessarily limited to, the following:
Federal
• DOT/Maritime Administration—
DWP license.
• DHS/U.S. Coast Guard—DWP
design and operational requirements.
• U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Title V Federal air
operating permit; Clean Water Act
(CWA) storm water and wastewater
discharge permits.
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE)—Clean Water Act Section 404
and Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10
permits.
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service—
Section 7, Endangered Species Act
(ESA) consultation.
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), Section 7, ESA
consultation requirements.
• NOAA Fisheries—MagnusonStevens Fisheries Management and
Conservation Act consultation.
• NOAA Fisheries—Marine Mammal
Protection Act consultation.
California
• California Coastal Commission
Compliance with California Coastal Act
and consistency with California Coastal
Management Program.
• California State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO), National
Historic Preservation Act Section 106
and California historic preservation
requirements, consultation and
compliance.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52611
City of Los Angeles
• Los Angeles Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB)—CWA Section
401 certification.
• Los Angeles RWQCB—Hydrostatic
test water discharge permit.
• Pipeline franchise and lease or
easement approvals.
• Local coastal development permit
in compliance with the California
Coastal Act.
(Authority: 49 CFR 1.66)
Dated: September 10, 2007.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Daron T. Threet,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–18130 Filed 9–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Research and Innovative Technology
Administration
[Docket Number: RITA–2007–27185]
Notice of Termination for Approval To
Collect Survey Data To Evaluate Close
Call Reporting System for Railroad
Operations
Volpe National Transportation
Systems Center (Volpe Center), Research
and Innovative Technology
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces that
the Volpe Center no longer intends to
request the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) to approve a data
collection effort to help in the
evaluation of a five-year demonstration
project focused on improving rail safety
by analyzing information on close calls
and other unsafe occurrences in the rail
industry.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joyce Ranney, RTV–4G, Room 1–655A,
Volpe Center; Kendall Square, 55
Broadway; Cambridge, MA 617–494–
2095; Fax No. (617) 494–3622; e-mail:
ranney@volpe.dot.gov.
The Volpe
Center is notifying the public that it no
longer intends to seek OMB approval for
the information collection activity
described in its February 13, 2007
Notice and Request for Comments (see
72 FR 6808). The agency did not receive
any comments to its February 13, 2007
Notice. The Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS) will continue to collect
Close Call Reporting System evaluation
related survey data under OMB Number
2139–0011.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 178 (Friday, September 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52607-52611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-18130]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[USCG-2007-26844]
Woodside Natural Gas, Inc. OceanWay Secure Energy Liquefied
Natural Gas Deepwater Port License Application; Preparation of
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report
AGENCY: Maritime Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent; notice of public meeting; request for
comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Maritime Administration and the U.S. Coast Guard announce
the intent to prepare an environmental impact statement/environmental
impact report (EIS/EIR). The application describes a project located in
the Federal waters of the Santa Monica Basin, approximately 27 miles
southwest of Los Angeles International Airport.
The EIS/EIR will be prepared with the City of Los Angeles (City) as
a cooperating agency in the environmental review with the Coast Guard
since the applicant has also filed an application for lease/franchise
of offshore submerged City lands and an onshore pipeline franchise for
the subsea pipelines through City waters and a pipeline through the
City. The EIS/EIR will meet the requirements of both the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA).
Publication of this notice begins a 30 day scoping process that
will assist in the identification and determination of the
environmental issues to be addressed in the EIS/EIR. This notice
requests public participation in the scoping process and provides
information regarding how to participate in the process. It announces a
public meeting to be held in connection with the EIS/EIR; requests
public comment on the scope of the EIS/EIR; and also serves as a notice
of intent (NOI) and notice of preparation (NOP) for the purposes of
California law.
DATES: The Coast Guard, Maritime Administration, and the City will
conduct an informational open house, followed by a public scoping
meeting Wednesday, September 26, 2007 to receive oral or written
comments. The informational open house will run from 4:30 p.m. to 6
p.m. followed by a public meeting from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. The time
may be extended depending on the number of speakers. Comments or
related material must be received by October 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: The open house and public meeting will be held at the Los
Angeles Airport Marriott, 5855 West Century Blvd, Los Angeles, CA
90045; (310) 641-5700. Please Note: All attendees are requested to
bring their hotel parking tickets inside the hotel for parking
validation.
The public docket for USCG-2007-26844 is maintained by the
Department of Transportation, Docket Management Facility, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Docket contents are available for public
inspection and copying at this address between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Facility's
telephone number is 202-366-9329, the fax number is 202-493-2251, and
the Web site for electronic submissions or for electronic access to
docket contents is https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the proposed
Project, the license application process, or the EIS/EIR process may be
directed to Roddy Bachman, U.S. Coast Guard, telephone: (202) 367-1451,
e-mail: (Roddy.C.Bachman@uscg.mil), or Linda Moore, City of Los
Angeles, telephone: (213) 485-5751, e-mail: (Linda.Moore@lacity.org).
Questions regarding viewing or submitting materials to the docket
may be directed to, Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, (202-493-0402).
The DOT Docket Management System also chronologically contains the
application and related correspondence, public meeting transcripts,
will contain the Draft and the Final EIS/EIR, and will contain all
comments submitted whether at public meetings or submitted directly.
This can be accessed at https://dms.dot.gov, and search for docket
number 26844.
Information pertaining to the proposed OceanWay Deepwater Port
Project is also available online with the City of Los Angeles at:
https://eng.lacity.org/techdocs/emg/Environmental_Review_
Documents.htm.
This public notice may be requested from the City of Los Angeles in
an alternative format such as Spanish translation, audiotape, large
print, or Braille. Contact the City of Los Angeles at the City project
Web site listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 52608]]
Public Meeting and Open House
The Coast Guard, Maritime Administration, and City plan to conduct
an informational open house and public meeting related to preparation
of an EIS/EIR for the proposed Project. The open house will be an
informal opportunity to ask questions and receive information regarding
the Project. The public scoping meeting will be structured to provide
the public with an opportunity to present comments regarding the
approach and conduct of the environmental analysis. Comments will help
us identify and refine the scope of the environmental issues to be
addressed in the EIS/EIR.
Speaker registrations will be available at the door. Speakers at
the public scoping meeting will be recognized in the following order:
Elected officials, public agencies, individuals or groups in the sign-
up order, and anyone else who wishes to speak. Speakers may be asked to
limit their oral comments to three (3) minutes in order to afford
everyone an opportunity to speak and the meeting time may be extended.
Speakers must identify themselves and any organization represented, by
name. Remarks will be recorded or transcribed for inclusion in the
public docket. Public docket materials will be made available to the
public on the Docket Management Facility's Docket Management System
(DMS). See ``Request for Comments'' for information about the DMS and
your rights under the Privacy Act.
Written comments will also be accepted. You may submit written
material at the public meeting, either in place of or in addition to
speaking. Written material must include your name and address, and will
be included in the public docket.
Please notify Roddy Bachman, U.S. Coast Guard, telephone: (202)
367-1451, e-mail: (Roddy.C.Bachman@uscg.mil) as soon as possible, but
at least three (3) business days before the scheduled meeting, if
translation of written materials is required.
A court reporter will also be available during the open house to
transcribe oral comments if you wish to speak at the meeting.
All public scoping meeting spaces will be wheelchair-accessible.
Individuals may request special accommodations for the public scoping
meetings, such as real-time translation. Contact the Coast Guard or
City of Los Angeles (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) if special
accommodations are required. Requests should be made as soon as
possible but at least three (3) business days before the scheduled
meeting. Include the name and telephone number of the contact person,
the timelines for requesting accommodations, and a TDD number that can
be used by individuals with hearing impairments.
Request for Comments
The Coast Guard, Maritime Administration, and the City request
submittal of comments and related material regarding this notice using
one of the methods described below. The Coast Guard, Maritime
Administration, and the City most particularly seek comments that
identify potentially significant impacts, alternatives, or mitigation
measures that should be taken into account in determining the scope of
the EIS/EIR.
We request public comments or other relevant information on
environmental issues related to the proposed deepwater port. The public
meeting is not the only opportunity to comment. In addition to or in
place of attending the meeting, comments may be submitted to the Docket
Management Facility or City of Los Angeles during the public comment
period (see DATES). The Coast Guard, Maritime Administration, and City
will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. It is not necessary to present comments more than once.
Comments need not be submitted to multiple agencies; all comments
received will be shared amongst agencies.
Submissions to the DOT Docket Management System should include:
Docket number USCG-2007-26844.
Your name and address.
Your reasons for making each comment or for bringing
information to our attention.
Submit comments or material using only one of the following
methods:
Electronic submission to DMS, https://dms.dot.gov.
Fax, mail, or hand delivery to the Docket Management
Facility (see ADDRESSES). Faxed or hand delivered submissions must be
unbound, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, and suitable for copying
and electronic scanning. If you mail your submission and want to know
when it reaches the Facility, include a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope.
Regardless of the method used for submitting comments or material,
all submissions will be posted, without change, to the DMS Web site
(https://dms.dot.gov), and will include any personal information
provided. Therefore, submitting this information makes it public. You
may wish to read the Privacy Act notice that is available on the DMS
Web site, or the Department of Transportation Privacy Act Statement
that appeared in the Federal Register on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477).
You may view docket submissions at the Docket Management Facility (see
ADDRESSES), or electronically on the DMS Web site.
Background
A notice of application for the proposed OceanWay DWP was published
in the Federal Register (FR) on September 7, 2007 (72 FR 51488).
Consult that notice for additional information regarding the proposed
DWP, the ship-to-ship transfer locations, the offshore and onshore
pipelines and the receiving and custody transfer facility. The
``Summary of the Application/Proposed Action'' from that publication is
reprinted below for your convenience.
Congress first authorized DWPs in 1974. Federal law (33 United
States Code [U.S.C.] 1501 et seq.) defines a DWP as any fixed or
floating manmade structure other than a vessel, or any group of such
structures, that is located beyond State seaward boundaries, and that
is used or intended for use as a port or terminal for the
transportation, storage, or further handling of oil or natural gas for
transportation to any state. All DWPs require a license granted by the
Maritime Administrator based on an application process administered by
the Coast Guard, in coordination with the Maritime Administration. Part
of that process involves assessment of the natural and human
environmental impacts from the port, in compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332). The Maritime
Administration and Coast Guard are the lead Federal agencies for NEPA
compliance. The Coast Guard, in cooperation with the Maritime
Administration, determines the scope and completes the environmental
review of the proposed project. This includes consultation with States
that are adjacent to the proposed port. For the purposes of the
OceanWay deepwater port application, California is an adjacent coastal
state. The Coast Guard and Maritime Administration have determined that
compliance with the NEPA requires preparation of an EIS.
The City has determined that the proposed port would require a City
license/franchise for subsea pipelines through City waters to deliver
the natural gas to shore, and a new franchise and other approvals for
the onshore pipeline and receiving and custody transfer station (RCTS)
to deliver the natural gas into the existing
[[Page 52609]]
pipeline system, and that compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) requires preparation of an EIR. Because of the many
similarities between an EIS and an EIR, the Coast Guard, Maritime
Administration and the City have agreed to cooperate in preparing a
single document that satisfies both the NEPA and the CEQA.
The EIS/EIR will be consistent with the Deepwater Port Act (DWPA)
of 1974, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.); the NEPA (Section
102[2][c]), as implemented by Council on Environmental Quality
regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations 1500 to 1508); and the CEQA
(California Public Resources Code 21000 et seq.) as implemented by the
State CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations 15000 et
seq.). The environmental review and analysis will be completed
according to the timeline prescribed by the DWPA, which requires a
decision within 356 days. The period to complete all NEPA/CEQA
documents is approximately 240 days. This timeline will govern the
activities related to the processing of the license application and the
completion of all NEPA and CEQA related actions needed to support the
decision regarding whether to approve, approve with conditions, or
disapprove the proposed license/lease/franchise.
This notice of intent is in compliance with the requirements of the
NEPA regulations and also serves as the notice of preparation as
required by CEQA. It briefly describes the proposed action and possible
alternatives and our proposed scoping process. Address any questions
about the proposed action, the scoping process, or the EIS/EIR to the
Coast Guard or City of Los Angeles (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
Proposed Action and Alternatives
The proposed action requiring environmental review is the Federal
licensing of the proposed deepwater port described in ``Summary of the
Application/Proposed Action/Project'' below. The alternatives to
licensing the proposed port are: (1) Licensing with conditions
(including conditions designed to mitigate environmental impact), and
(2) denying the application, which for purposes of environmental review
is the ``no-action'' alternative.
The proposed action requiring environmental review by the City of
Los Angeles is the granting of a pipeline franchise and appurtenant
approvals for the same project.
Scoping Process
Public scoping is an early and open process for identifying and
determining the scope of issues addressed in the EIS/EIR. Scoping
begins with this notice, continues through the public comment period
and ends when the Coast Guard, Maritime Administration and the City
have:
Invited the participation of Federal, State, and local
agencies, any affected Indian tribes, the applicant, and other
interested persons;
Determined the actions, alternatives, and impacts
described in 40 CFR 1508.25;
Identified and eliminated from detailed study those issues
that are not significant or that have been covered elsewhere;
Allocated responsibility for preparing EIS/EIR components;
Indicated any related environmental assessments or
environmental impact statements that are not part of the EIS;
Identified other relevant environmental review and
consultation requirements;
Indicated the relationship between timing of the
environmental review and other aspects of the application process; and
At the Federal agencies' discretion, exercised the options
provided in 40 CFR 1501.7 (b).
Once the scoping process is complete, the Coast Guard and City of
Los Angeles will prepare a draft EIS/EIR (DEIS/DEIR), and publish a
Federal Register notice announcing its public availability. To receive
that notice, please contact those identified in (FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). An opportunity to review and comment on the draft
EIS/EIR will be provided. The Coast Guard, Maritime Administration and
City will consider those comments in the preparation of the final EIS/
EIR (FEIS/FEIR). As with the draft EIS, we will announce the
availability of the FEIS/FEIR and once again allow an opportunity for
review and comment.
Availability of EIS/EIR
A notice of availability (NOA) will be published in the Federal
Register when the DEIS/DEIR is available, and the City will file a
notice of completion with the California State Clearinghouse and the
Los Angeles County Clerk and will publish a notice of availability in
the ``City of Los Angeles Environmental Notices'' section of the Los
Angeles Times. The DEIS/DEIR in hardcopy or electronic format will be
distributed to agencies, local public libraries and interested parties
that have requested copies. Anyone who wishes to comment on the draft
report will be provided with an opportunity to review the DEIS/DEIR and
to offer comments on the environmental effects of the proposed project.
Comments received during the DEIS/DEIR review period will be available
in the public docket and responded to in the FEIS/FEIR. An NOA of the
FEIS/FEIR will also be published in the Federal Register, and the City
will issue notices of availability and completion. Additional public
meetings will be held after the draft and final documents are
published.
Summary of the Application/Proposed Action/Project
Woodside Natural Gas proposes to construct, own, and operate a
deepwater port with associated ship-to-ship transfer (STS) location(s)
and single point mooring (SPM) buoys for the receiving of
regasification liquefied natural gas carriers (RLNGCs), offshore and
onshore natural gas pipelines and a receiving and custody transfer
facility (RCTS) to deliver natural gas with an annualized rate of 0.4
billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d) and a peak of 1.1 bcf/d into the
Southern California market on initial development and an annualized
rate of 1.0 bcf/d and a peak of up to 1.6 bcf/d at full project
development.
The deepwater port would be located in the Federal waters of the
Santa Monica Basin, 21 miles from the nearest point on the mainland of
Southern California, and 18 miles from the western end of Santa
Catalina Island, approximately 27 miles southwest of Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX), in a water depth of approximately 3,000
feet. It would consist of two single point mooring (SPM) buoys that
serve as cargo discharge system connections for the RLNGCs, a mooring/
anchoring array, four flexible risers that connect the SPMs to four
seafloor riser end manifolds, two pipeline end manifolds (PLEMs) and
two parallel 24-inch pipelines beginning on the seafloor at the PLEMs
beneath the SPM buoys and continuing to shore. The SPMs would be
located approximately 5 nautical miles (5.75 miles) outside established
shipping lanes (SPM NE: Latitude: 33[deg]41'52'' N, Longitude:
118[deg]48'33'' W and SPM SW: Latitude: 33[deg]39'58'' N, Longitude:
118[deg]49'15'' W).
Woodside has proposed three ship-to-ship transfer locations ranging
from approximately 35 to 90 nautical miles (40 to 104 miles) from shore
and 55 to 111 nautical miles (63 to 128 miles) from the port where each
RLNGC is expected to receive LNG cargo at sea from conventional LNG
carriers
[[Page 52610]]
(LNGCs): STS1 Santa Rosa (Latitude 33[deg]39' N, Longitude
119[deg]56'30'' W), STS2 Inshore San Clemente (Latitude 33[deg]05' N,
Longitude 118[deg]10' W) and STS3 Skaugen Offshore (Latitude 32[deg]15'
N, Longitude 120[deg]0' W). Only one transfer location would be used at
a time. The RLNGCs, with storage capacity of 224,000 m\3\ of LNG would
be capable of receiving LNGCs with storage capacities of up to 216,000
m\3\ of LNG.
As proposed, LNG would be delivered from overseas by LNGCs and
transferred to a Woodside RLNGC at one of the three STS locations. The
RLNGC would then be sailed and moored to a SPM, where the LNG would be
regasified into natural gas and delivered to shore via two new parallel
24-inch pipelines. The RLNGC would then return to a STS location.
The RLNGCs would use a turret system with the SPMs to allow the
RLNGC to weathervane (rotate) around the buoy. Onboard utilities and
systems associated with RLNGC operations would include electric power
generation and distribution, instrumentation and controls, and fire and
safety systems. The RLNGC would include all marine systems,
communications, navigation aids and equipment necessary to safely
conduct RLNGC carrier operations receive and vaporize the product.
The RLNGCs would use a forced draft ambient air LNG vaporization
system employing a combination of intermediate fluid and direct ambient
air with heat provided by ambient air called the Woodside Hybrid Air
Vaporization (WHAV) concept.
Natural gas would be delivered onshore via two 24-inch parallel
pipelines, approximately 35 miles in length. These pipelines would come
onshore on the north end of LAX at Dockweiler Beach. It is proposed
that horizontal directional drilling be used to install the pipelines
beneath land and seabed in offshore City waters and underneath the
beach and adjacent dunes from a point about 1000 feet inland from the
high tide mark just east of Vista del Mar on LAX property.
Woodside would lease/franchise from the City a 300 foot wide
corridor on submerged City lands out to the 3 nautical mile (3.45 mile)
offshore limit of the City boundary. On-shore pipelines would be
constructed on City-owned land from the high tide line to Pershing
Drive, passing under the beach and the El Segundo Dunes, and
underground through City streets. The route would include Westchester
Parkway/Arbor Vitae Street, then south on Bellanca Avenue to the
receiving and custody transfer station (RCTS) and adjacent Inert Gas
Injection Facility (IGIF) located at 5651 96th Street, Los Angeles,
about 4 miles inland. A single 36-inch pipeline would run approximately
a quarter of a mile back north on Bellanca Avenue to Arbor Vitae, then
to the existing Southern California Gas natural gas pipeline
infrastructure with Tie-in 1 at the intersection of Aviation
Boulevard and Arbor Vitae Street. A second stage, with development
depending on demand, may include additional pipelines and tie-ins that
are an approximate 11-mile single 24-inch line from Tie-in 1
along Arbor Vitae, Prairie, Manchester, Firestone, and California to
Tie-in 3 at Santa Ana Street and Otis Avenue in South Gate and
approximate 1 mile single 24-inch line from Manchester Street to
Central Ave to Tie-in 2 at the intersection of S. Central
Avenue and E. Century Boulevard. These pipeline routes include areas
within the cities of Los Angeles, Inglewood, and South Gate. At full
development, Southern California Gas would own and operate the system
downstream of the RCTS.
The application also includes an alternative DWP location in the
Gulf of Santa Catalina approximately 30 miles from Huntington Beach at
latitude 117[deg]56'28.53'' west, longitude 33[deg]13'24.88'' north
with a 30-mile pipeline running north to a shore crossing at the AES
power plant in Huntington Beach. It would cross through the cities of
Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Westminster, Garden Grove, Santa
Ana, and Orange. It would be trenched through city streets traveling
north along Newland Street towards Bolsa Avenue; turn east at Bolsa
Ave. (1st Street); turn north at the OCTA Metrolink Right of Way and
join Lincoln Ave; east on Fairhaven Ave.; north at Cambridge Street;
and finally west on Palm Ave., where it would connect to the SCG tie-in
in Orange.
Currently Identified Environmental Issues
The NEPA and CEQA processes require agencies to consider
environmental impacts that may result from a proposed action, to inform
the public of potential impacts and alternatives, and to facilitate
public involvement in the assessment process. Additionally, CEQA
requires measures to avoid or lessen the significant impacts of a
project when granting an approval, unless it finds certain benefits of
the project outweigh those significant effects.
The EIS/EIR for the OceanWay DWP will describe the nature and
extent of environmental impacts of the proposed action and each
alternative, and will discuss appropriate mitigation measures for any
adverse impacts. The EIS/EIR will include, among other matters,
discussions of the purpose and need for the proposed action, a
description of alternatives, a description of the affected environment,
an evaluation of the environmental impacts of the proposed action and
alternatives, and explanations of proposed mitigation. The EIS/EIR will
assess the impacts of the alternatives on the natural and human
environment, including the no-action/no project alternative, which for
this Project would mean that the Maritime Administration would not
approve the application or the City would not approve the application
for the lease/franchise of the offshore pipelines in City waters, the
RCTS, and onshore pipelines. Regardless of geographic or other
jurisdictional boundaries, the Coast Guard, Maritime Administration and
the City will consider the entire proposed Project. Environmental
issues that will require detailed analysis include, but are not
necessarily limited to:
Aesthetics: Alteration of the view shed by construction and
operations.
Air Quality: Impacts on regional air quality, including visibility
and other resources in sensitive Federal Class I areas (e.g., Channel
Islands National Park).
Geological Resources and Soils: Impacts on facilities from seismic
hazards; Impacts on onshore facilities from liquefaction; and erosion
and dust.
Hazardous/Toxic Materials and Wastes: Impacts from HAZMAT spills
including petroleum, LNG, other hydrocarbons, fuels, lubricant, urea,
paints, solvents, and sanitary or other hazardous/toxic materials or
waste.
Marine Transportation: Disruption in marine transportation
affecting existing ship traffic to and from the ports of Los Angeles
and Long Beach or other ports; potential navigational hazards to marine
traffic; and increase in tanker travel to and from the single point
mooring locations that could impact existing marine traffic.
Marine Biology: Vessels potentially striking sea turtles and marine
mammals; crushing and displacement of benthic communities during
construction; effects of ``cold water'' resulting from LNG release to
marine mammals; and effects of increases in turbidity and changes in
water quality, lights, and noise.
Terrestrial and Freshwater Biology: Impacts from construction or
operation on wetlands and other habitats, and sensitive species, within
the proposed pipeline landing and corridor areas.
Recreation: Impacts on boating and commercial and recreational
fishing
[[Page 52611]]
opportunities; recreational areas potentially impacted by noise or dust
generated during construction; access to the beach or ocean; and
permanent and temporary areas of restricted access around the RLNGC.
Hazards and Risk/Safety: LNG releases resulting in potential
impacts on third parties from fire, radiant energy, or ignitable gas
clouds (mainly to passengers of small craft operating near the RLNGC);
and effects of pipeline failures on humans, property, and marine and
terrestrial ecosystems. The EIS/EIR will include an independently
prepared, site-specific risk assessment.
Noise: Potential increases in noise levels due to project
construction and operation; and effects of noise on local residents,
recreational visitors, passengers and crews on marine vessels, and
marine mammals.
Water Quality: Impacts from LNG or spills, increases in turbidity,
or unearthing of contaminated sediments; and increases in shoreline
erosion during construction and operation.
Environmental Justice: Potential disproportionate effects on
minority and low-income populations within the Project area. The EIS/
EIR will identify any relevant populations that might be
disproportionately affected by the proposed Project.
Cultural Resources: Potential effects on known and as yet
unidentified cultural resources, offshore and onshore.
Energy and Mineral Resources: Restriction of future availability of
exploitable oil and gas resources due to infrastructure development and
restricted access.
Land Use and Traffic: Impacts to existing land uses, especially in
coastal areas designated for recreational purposes; impacts on marine
resources off the coast of Los Angeles, including Catalina Island, the
Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary and Channel Islands National
Park; and disruptions to traffic use and patterns.
Population and Housing: Impacts on the existing community character
and development, population, housing, infrastructure and social
services, employment, and the regional economic base.
Cumulative Impacts: The EIS/EIR will evaluate the cumulative
effects of the project within each resource area examined. These
include the incremental effects of past projects, other current and
proposed projects, and reasonably foreseeable future projects.
No-Action/No Project Alternative: The EIS/EIR will examine the
impacts of not approving the DWP license/lease/franchise application.
Alternative Offshore Locations: The EIS/EIR will consider an
alternative location in the vicinity of the proposed Project and other
locations adjacent to the California coast.
Land-Based Alternatives: The California Legislature mandated the
evaluation of land-based LNG sites. Land-based alternatives previously
considered by California agencies will be considered.
Alternative Technologies: Alternative Project technologies,
including open rack vaporizers and a hybrid vaporization system and
alternative facility designs will also be evaluated.
Alternative Pipeline Routes: The EIS/EIR will also evaluate an
alternative submarine pipeline route and an alternative onshore
pipeline route.
Federal, State, and City Permit, Approval, and Consultation: The
major federal and city permit, approval, and consultation requirements
for OceanWay include, but are not necessarily limited to, the
following:
Federal
DOT/Maritime Administration--DWP license.
DHS/U.S. Coast Guard--DWP design and operational
requirements.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Title V Federal
air operating permit; Clean Water Act (CWA) storm water and wastewater
discharge permits.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)--Clean Water Act
Section 404 and Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 permits.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service--Section 7, Endangered
Species Act (ESA) consultation.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Section 7, ESA consultation requirements.
NOAA Fisheries--Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Management and
Conservation Act consultation.
NOAA Fisheries--Marine Mammal Protection Act consultation.
California
California Coastal Commission Compliance with California
Coastal Act and consistency with California Coastal Management Program.
California State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO),
National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 and California historic
preservation requirements, consultation and compliance.
City of Los Angeles
Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)--
CWA Section 401 certification.
Los Angeles RWQCB--Hydrostatic test water discharge
permit.
Pipeline franchise and lease or easement approvals.
Local coastal development permit in compliance with the
California Coastal Act.
(Authority: 49 CFR 1.66)
Dated: September 10, 2007.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Daron T. Threet,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-18130 Filed 9-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P