Multi-Employer Pension Plan Information Made Available on Request, 52527-52534 [E7-18073]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Proposed Rules
a. Designate the existing text as
paragraph (a) and remove ‘‘(b)(3)(i)’’ and
add in its place ‘‘(b)(2)’’;
b. Add new paragraphs (b), (c), and
(d) to read as follows:
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
§ 215.6
The Model Agreement.
(a) * * *
(b) A grant applicant that is an
employer not initially a party to the
Model Agreement but seeking to use the
Model Agreement as the basis of the
Department’s certification may become
party thereto by serving written notice
of its desire to do so upon the Secretary
of Labor, the American Public Transit
Association, or its designee, and the
unions signatory to the Model
Agreement, or their designee. In the
event of any objection to the addition of
such employer as a signatory, then the
dispute as to whether such employer
shall become a signatory shall be
determined by the Secretary of Labor.
(c) A labor organization that is the
collective bargaining representative of
urban mass transportation employees in
the service area of a grant recipient but
not initially a party to the Model
Agreement, and who may be affected by
the assistance to the recipient, may
become a party to the Model Agreement
by serving written notice of its desire to
do so upon the other union
representatives of the employees
affected by the project, the recipient,
and the Secretary of Labor. In the event
of any disagreement that such labor
organization should become a party to
the Model Agreement, as applied to the
Project, then the dispute as to whether
such labor organization shall participate
shall be determined by the Secretary of
Labor.
(d) Any signatory employer may
individually withdraw from the Model
Agreement by serving written notice of
its intention to withdraw upon the
Secretary of Labor, the American Public
Transit Association, or its designee, and
the unions signatory to the Model
Agreement, or their designee. Any labor
organization may individually withdraw
from the Model Agreement by serving
written notice of its intention to
withdraw upon the other union
representatives of the employees
affected by the project, the recipient,
and the Secretary of Labor. Written
notice to withdraw must be served one
hundred twenty (120) days prior to
October 1, which is the annual renewal
date of the Model Agreement.
7. Section 215.7 is amended as
follows:
a. Remove ‘‘(b)(3)(ii)’’ and add
‘‘(b)(2)’’ in its place;
b. Remove the phrase ‘‘small urban
and rural program under section 5311 of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
the Federal Transit Statute’’ and add in
its place ‘‘Other Than Urbanized
program’’.
c. Designate the existing text as
paragraph (a) and add two sentences to
the end; and
d. Add new paragraphs (b) and (c).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 215.7
The Special Warranty.
(a) * * * The Special Warranty
Arrangement applicable to OTRB and
‘‘Other Than Urbanized’’ grants will be
derived from the terms and conditions
of the May 1979 Special Section 13(c)
Warranty, and the Department’s
subsequent experience under 49 U.S.C.
5333(b). From time to time, the
Department may update this Special
Warranty Arrangement to reflect
developments in the employee
protection program.
(b) The requirements of 49 U.S.C.
5333(b) for OTRB and ‘‘Other Than
Urbanized’’ grants are satisfied through
application of a Special Warranty
Arrangement certified by the
Department of Labor; a copy of the
current arrangement will be included on
the OLMS Web site.
(c) The Federal Transit
Administration will include the current
version of the Special Warranty
Arrangement, through reference in its
Master Agreement, in each OTRB and
‘‘Other Than Urbanized’’ grant of
assistance under the statute.
(1) The Federal Transit
Administration will notify the
Department that it is funding an OTRB
or ‘‘Other Than Urbanized’’ grant by
transmitting to the Department an
information copy of each grant
application upon approval of the grant.
(i) Each grant of assistance for an
‘‘Other Than Urbanized’’ program will
contain a labor section identifying labor
organizations representing transit
employees of each subrecipient, the
labor organizations representing
employees of other transit providers in
the service area, and a list of those
transit providers. A sample format is
posted on the OLMS Web site to
facilitate the inclusion of this
information in the grant application.
(ii) OTRB grants of assistance will
contain a labor section identifying labor
organizations representing transit
employees of the recipient.
(2) The Department will notify labor
organizations representing potentially
affected transit employees of OTRB
grants and inform them of their rights
under the Special Warranty
Arrangement.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 215.8
52527
[Amended]
8. Section 215.8 is amended as
follows:
a. Remove ‘‘Director,’’ and add in its
place ‘‘Chief, Division of’’;
b. Remove ‘‘Suite N5603,’’; and
c. Add the phrase ‘‘or e-mailed to
OLMS-TransitGrant@dol.gov’’ at the end
of the paragraph.
Victoria Lipnic,
Assistant Secretary for Employment
Standards.
Donald Todd,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of LaborManagement Standards.
[FR Doc. E7–18040 Filed 9–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–CP–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
29 CFR Part 2520
RIN 1210–AB21
Multi-Employer Pension Plan
Information Made Available on
Request
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains a
proposed regulation that, upon
adoption, would implement
amendments to the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,
as amended (ERISA or the Act),
requiring the administrator of a multiemployer plan to provide copies of
certain actuarial and financial
information about the plan to
participants and others upon request.
The amendments, enacted by the
Pension Protection Act of 2006, added
subsection (k) to section 101 of ERISA.
The proposed regulation would affect
plan administrators, participants and
beneficiaries of multi-employer plans,
as well as employee representatives of
such participants and employers that
have an obligation to contribute to such
plans.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed regulation should be received
by the Department of Labor on or before
October 15, 2007.
ADDRESSES: To facilitate the receipt and
processing of comments, the
Department encourages interested
persons to submit their comments
electronically by e-mail to eORI@dol.gov, or by using the Federal
eRulemaking portal at
www.regulations.gov (follow
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
52528
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
instructions for submission of
comments). Persons submitting
comments electronically are encouraged
not to submit paper copies. Persons
interested in submitting comments on
paper should send or deliver their
comments (at least three copies) to the
Office of Regulations and
Interpretations, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, Room N–5669,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210, Attention: ERISA 101(k)
Regulation. Comments received will be
posted without change to
www.regulations.gov and www.dol.gov/
ebsa, and available for public inspection
at the Public Disclosure Room, N–1513,
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210,
including any personal information
provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie L. Ward, Office of
Regulations and Interpretations,
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, (202) 693–8500. This is
not a toll-free number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
Section 502(a)(1) of the Pension
Protection Act of 2006, Public Law 109–
280, 120 Stat. 780 (PPA), which was
enacted on August 17, 2006, amended
the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended
(ERISA or the Act), by adding section
101(k). Section 101(k)(1) of ERISA
requires the administrator of a multiemployer pension plan, upon written
request, to furnish certain documents to
any plan participant, beneficiary,
employee representative, or any
employer that has an obligation to
contribute to the plan. The documents
that are required to be furnished are: (A)
A copy of any periodic actuarial report
(including sensitivity testing) received
by the plan for any plan year which has
been in the plan’s possession for at least
30 days; (B) a copy of any quarterly,
semi-annual, or annual financial report
prepared for the plan by any plan
investment manager or advisor or other
fiduciary which has been in the plan’s
possession for at least 30 days; and (C)
a copy of any application filed with the
Secretary of the Treasury requesting an
extension under section 304 of the Act
(or section 431(d) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986) and the
determination of such Secretary
pursuant to such application.
Section 502(a)(2) of the PPA amended
section 502(c)(4) of ERISA to provide
that the Secretary of Labor may assess
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
a civil penalty of not more than $1,000
a day for each violation of section
101(k). Section 502(a)(3) of the PPA
provides that the Secretary of Labor
shall prescribe regulations under section
101(k)(2) not later than one year after
the date of enactment of the PPA.
Section 502(d) of the PPA provides that
section 101(k) shall apply to plan years
beginning after December 31, 2007.
B. Overview of Proposed Regulation
Included in this notice is a proposed
regulation that, upon adoption, would
implement the new disclosure
requirement under section 101(k) of the
Act. Interested parties are invited to
comment on all aspects of the
regulation. The Department intends to
publish a separate regulation
implementing the Secretary’s authority
to assess civil penalties under section
502(c)(4) of ERISA at a later date.
Paragraph (a) of the proposed
regulation provides that the
administrator of a multi-employer
pension plan shall furnish copies of
actuarial, financial and funding-related
documents to certain persons who make
written requests to the plan.
For purposes of paragraph (a), a
person entitled to request and receive
documents is any participant within the
meaning of section 3(7) of the Act; any
beneficiary receiving benefits under the
plan; any labor organization
representing participants under the
plan; or any employer that is a party to
the collective bargaining agreement(s)
pursuant to which the plan is
maintained or who otherwise may be
subject to withdrawal liability pursuant
to section 4203 of the Act. See
§ 2520.101–6(d). In this regard, the
phrase ‘‘any employer that has an
obligation to contribute to the plan’’
under section 101(k) of the Act has been
construed under paragraph (d)(4) of the
proposed regulation in a manner that is
consistent with the construction given
to similar language under section 101(f)
of ERISA, which relates to annual
funding notices of multi-employer
defined benefit pension plans.1
Paragraph (b)(1) of the proposed
regulation provides that the plan
administrator must furnish the
requested document or documents to
the requester not later than 30 days after
the date the written request is received
by the plan, subject to the limitations in
paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4).
Paragraph (b)(3) of the proposed
regulation provides that a plan
administrator is not required to furnish
to any requester more than one copy of
1 See 29 CFR 2520.101–4(f)(4); 71 FR 1904, Jan.
11, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
a document described in paragraph (c)
during any 12-month period. Thus, an
eligible requester would not be entitled
to receive more than one copy of the
same financial report within a 12-month
period. This limitation, however, does
not mean that an eligible requester
would not be entitled to request and
receive copies of two different reports
(e.g., one financial report and one
actuarial report) during any 12-month
period. For purposes of the application
of this 12-month limitation, the
Department is of the view that the 12month period commences from the
earlier of the date the plan actually
responds to a request or the 30th day
referenced in paragraph (b)(1) of the
regulation.
Paragraph (b)(4) of the proposed
regulation permits the plan
administrator to charge the requester for
the reasonable costs of furnishing
documents. The PPA specifically
authorizes the Department to prescribe
in regulations the maximum amount
that would be considered a reasonable
charge for furnishing documents under
this section. For this purpose, the
Department proposes that a reasonable
charge may not exceed the lesser of the
actual cost to the plan for the least
expensive means of acceptable
reproduction of the document, or 25
cents per page, plus the cost of mailing
or otherwise delivering the requested
document. This standard adopts the
existing reasonable charge standard
under 29 CFR 2520.104b–30, but also
permits the plan administrator to charge
the requester the actual cost to the plan
of mailing or delivering the document or
information.
Paragraph (b)(2) provides that such
documents must be furnished in a
manner consistent with the general
furnishing requirements set forth in 29
CFR 2520.104b–1 including the use of
electronic media. See § 2520.104b–1(c).
In this regard, wherever possible, the
Department encourages plan
administrators to use electronic media
to furnish requested information in
order to reduce compliance costs under
the regulation.2
Paragraph (c) of the proposed
regulation delineates the documents
that must be disclosed pursuant to
section 101(k). Paragraph (c)(1) provides
that information subject to the
disclosure requirement in paragraph (a)
consists of a copy of any periodic
2 As part of a separate rulemaking initiative, the
Department is undertaking a review of the rules in
paragraph (c) of § 2520.104b–1 relating to disclosure
through electronic media. The Department is
reviewing these rules in light of advances in
technology and new disclosure requirements under
ERISA following enactment of the PPA.
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Proposed Rules
actuarial report (including any
sensitivity testing) received by the plan
that has been in the plan’s possession
for at least 30 days before the plan
receives the written request; a copy of
any quarterly, semi-annual, or annual
financial report prepared for the plan by
any plan investment manager or advisor
(without regard to whether such advisor
is a fiduciary within the meaning of
section 3(21) of the Act) or other
fiduciary which has been in the plan’s
possession for at least 30 days before the
plan receives the written request; and a
copy of any application filed by the plan
sponsor with the Secretary of the
Treasury requesting an amortization
extension under section 304 of the Act
or section 431(d) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 and the
determination of such Secretary
pursuant to such application.
To provide plan administrators with
clarity regarding their disclosure
obligations under section 101(k), the
proposed regulation clarifies that
financial reports prepared by advisors
are subject to disclosure without regard
to whether the advisor or advisors are
fiduciaries within the meaning of
section 3(21) of ERISA. See § 2520.101–
6(c)(1)(ii). The Department specifically
requests comments on whether this
clarification alone provides sufficient
certainty as to what financial reports are
required to be disclosed, or, whether, in
addition, the term ‘‘financial report’’
should also be clarified in regulation
and, if so, how.
Paragraph (c)(2) provides that
documents required to be disclosed
under the regulation shall not include
certain information. In this regard,
paragraph (c)(2)(i) provides that
required disclosures do not include the
information or data which served as the
basis for such report or application, e.g.,
the data behind or underlying a report
or application. In addition, paragraph
(c)(2)(ii) of the proposed regulation
provides that disclosed reports or
applications shall not include any
information that the plan administrator
reasonably determines to be either
individually identifiable information
regarding any plan participant,
beneficiary, employee, fiduciary, or
contributing employer, or proprietary
information regarding the plan, any
contributing employer, or entity
providing services to the plan. The
Department specifically invites
comment on whether clarification is
needed with respect to determinations
regarding what information should be
considered ‘‘proprietary’’ or
‘‘individually identifiable’’ in this
context and, if so, what standards
should govern such determinations. In
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
this regard, paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of the
proposed rule clarifies that, in
responding to a request under the
regulation, a plan administrator is
required to inform the requester if the
plan administrator withholds any
information determined to be
‘‘proprietary’’ or ‘‘individually
identifiable’’ within the meaning of the
restrictions in paragraph (c)(2) of the
proposed regulation.
Along with the proposed regulation
under section 101(k), discussed above,
this notice also includes amendments to
29 CFR 2520.104b–30, which provides
guidelines for assessing a reasonable
charge for furnishing plan documents
pursuant to section 104(b)(4) of the Act
(e.g., latest updated summary plan
description, latest annual report, any
terminal report, etc.). Language in
§ 2520.104b–30 could be construed as
contrary to specific language in section
101(k) of ERISA, § 2520.101–6, and
other PPA provisions amending title I of
ERISA that expressly permit plan
administrators to impose reasonable
charges on requesters for the cost of
furnishing the requested information,
including handling and postage charges.
Accordingly, minor conforming
amendments are being proposed to
paragraph (a) of § 2520.104b–30 to
eliminate any ambiguity that may be
caused by current § 2520.104b–30.
C. Regulatory Impact Analysis
Summary
The proposed rule contains guidance
necessary to implement the
amendments made by new section
101(k) of the Act, as enacted by section
502(a)(1) of the PPA, which requires
multiemployer plan administrators to
provide, upon written request, copies of
certain actuarial and financial reports
about the plan to participants,
beneficiaries, employee representatives,
or any employer that has an obligation
to contribute to the plan.
This disclosure requirement of PPA
was enacted because more complete
disclosures were considered an
important element of measures enacted
in PPA to strengthen the long-term
health of the multiemployer plan
pension system. Providing participants
and beneficiaries, employee
representatives, and contributing
employers with greater access to
actuarial and financial information
regarding their plans will increase the
transparency of the operation of
multiemployer pension plans and afford
all parties interested in the financial
viability of such plans greater
opportunity to monitor their funding
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52529
and financial status and to take
appropriate action when necessary.
By clarifying certain terms used in
section 101(k) of the Act, this regulation
will also permit multiemployer plan
administrators to fulfill their disclosure
responsibilities under this section with
greater certainty and less cost. The
increase in transparency of plan
operations may also contribute to an
atmosphere of greater accountability on
the part of plan officials. These benefits
have not been quantified.
The cost of the multiemployer plan
disclosure requirement under section
101(k) of the Act and the rule is
expected to total approximately $2.3
million in the year of implementation,
$2.0 million in the second year, and
$1.4 million in the third year. These
costs arise from logging in disclosure
requests, copying and mailing the
reports, and contracting for redacting
individually identifiable and
proprietary information from the
reports. In addition, multiemployer
plans will devote in-house staff time to
complying with this regulation. The
total hour burden is estimated to be
56,000 hours in 2008, 49,000 in 2009
and 37,000 in 2010. Both the dollar
burden and the hour burden are
projected to fall over the three-year
period as interest in the aging inventory
of existing documents subject to this
regulation wanes. The dollar equivalent
of the three-year hour burden is
estimated to be $4.4 million.
Because the costs of the proposed
regulation arise from notice provisions
in the PPA, the data and methodology
used in developing these estimates are
more fully described in the Paperwork
Reduction Act section of this analysis of
regulatory impact.
Executive Order 12866 Statement
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735), the Department must determine
whether a regulatory action is
‘‘significant’’ and therefore subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of the
Executive Order defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as an action that is
likely to result in a rule (1) having an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, or adversely and
materially affecting a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local or tribal
governments or communities (also
referred to as ‘‘economically
significant’’); (2) creating a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfering
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) materially altering
the budgetary impacts of entitlement
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
52530
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Proposed Rules
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) raising novel legal or
policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order. Although the Department
believes that this regulatory action is not
economically significant within the
meaning of section 3(f)(1) of the
Executive Order, the action has been
determined to be significant within the
meaning of section 3(f)(4) of the
Executive Order, and the Department
accordingly provides the following
assessment of its potential costs and
benefits. As elaborated below, the
Department believes that the benefits of
the rule justify its costs.
In assessing the costs and benefits of
the rule and associated provisions of the
Act, the Department endeavored to
consider all of the major activities that
will be carried out pursuant to them.
For example, multiemployer pension
plan administrators will have to make
arrangements for copying and mailing
the reports and redacting individually
identifiable and proprietary information
from the reports. Because the regulation
does not require the creation of any new
documents, the costs of the rule are
limited to those arising from logging in
requests and from copying, mailing and
redacting disclosed reports.
The Department estimates that the
total cost 3 for all multiemployer plans
to comply with the regulation will
average $1,200 per plan year over the
2008–2010 periods. Given that total
2004 assets of multiemployer pension
plans averaged about $247 million in
defined benefit plans and $50 million in
defined contribution plans, this annual
cost is approximately 0.0012% of
average plan assets in defined benefit
plans and 0.0061% of assets in defined
contribution plans. The Department
believes that the transparency contained
in the rule and associated section 101(k)
of the Act will provide participants,
beneficiaries, employee representatives,
and contributing employers with
important information regarding the
funding and financial status of
multiemployer pension plans. These
disclosures will allow participants,
beneficiaries, employee representatives,
and contributing employers to learn
more about the financial status of their
plans and take action where
appropriate. Although the benefits of
this increased transparency have not
been quantified, the Department has
concluded that these benefits of the rule
outweigh its modest costs. The
3 Total cost is the sum of the dollar burden and
the dollar equivalent of the hour burden.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Department invites comments on this
assessment and its conclusions.
Paperwork Reduction Act
As part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, the Department of Labor
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA
95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This helps
to ensure that requested data can be
provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial
resources) is minimized, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
the impact of collection requirements on
respondents can be properly assessed.
Currently, EBSA is soliciting
comments concerning the proposed
information collection request (ICR)
included in the Proposed Regulation on
Multiemployer Pension Plan
Information Made Available on Request.
A copy of the ICR may be obtained by
contacting the PRA addressee shown
below.
The Department has submitted a copy
of the proposed rule to OMB in
accordance with 44 U.S.C. 3507(d) for
review of its information collections.
The Department and OMB are
particularly interested in comments
that:
• Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Comments should be sent to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10235, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503;
Attention: Desk Officer for the
Employee Benefits Security
Administration. OMB requests that
comments be received within 30 days of
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
publication of the proposed regulation
to ensure their consideration.
PRA Addressee: Address requests for
copies of the ICR to Joseph S. Piacentini,
Office of Policy and Research, U.S.
Department of Labor, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N–
5647, Washington, DC 20210.
Telephone (202) 693–8410; Fax: (202)
219–5333. These are not toll-free
numbers.
The proposed regulation would, upon
adoption, implement the disclosure
requirements of new section 101(k) of
the Act, as added by section 502(a)(1) of
the PPA. As described earlier in the
preamble, section 101(k)(1) of the Act
requires multiemployer plan
administrators, upon written request, to
furnish certain documents to any plan
participant, beneficiary, employee
representative, or any employer that has
an obligation to contribute to the plan.
The documents that may be requested
are (1) a copy of any periodic actuarial
report (including sensitivity testing)
received by the plan for any plan year
which has been in the plan’s possession
for at least 30 days; (2) a copy of any
quarterly, semi-annual, or annual
financial report prepared for the plan by
any plan investment manager or advisor
or other fiduciary that has been in the
plan’s possession for at least 30 days;
and (3) a copy of any application filed
with the Secretary of the Treasury
requesting an extension under section
304 of the Act (or section 431(d) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986) and the
determination of such Secretary
pursuant to such application.
The information collection provisions
of this proposed rule are found in
section 2520.101–6(a) of the proposed
rule, which requires multiemployer
defined benefit and defined
contribution pension plan
administrators to furnish copies of
actuarial, financial, and funding related
documents to plan participants,
beneficiaries, employee representatives,
and contributing employers upon
request. This information constitutes a
third-party disclosure from the
administrator to participants,
beneficiaries, employee representatives,
and contributing employers. Pursuant to
section 2520.101–6(c)(2) the documents
required to be disclosed shall not
contain any information that the plan
administrator reasonably determines to
be either: (i) Individually identifiable
information regarding any plan
participant, beneficiary, employee,
fiduciary, or contributing employer, or
(ii) proprietary information regarding
the plan, any contributing employer, or
entity providing services to the plan.
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Proposed Rules
The plan administrator must inform the
requester if any such information is
withheld.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Annual Hour Burden
In order to estimate the potential costs
of the disclosure provisions of section
101(k) of the Act and this proposed rule,
the Department estimated the number of
multiemployer defined benefit and
defined contribution pension plans.
Based on data derived exclusively from
the Form 5500 for the 2004 plan year,
which is the most recent year for which
complete data are available, the
Department estimates that there are
1,533 multiemployer defined benefit
plans 4 and 1,372 multiemployer
defined contribution plans that would
be subject to this disclosure
requirement. Because section 101(k) of
the Act and the regulation generally do
not limit the class of documents that can
be requested in any way by date of
creation or receipt, the Department has
assumed for purposes of this estimate
that each multiemployer defined benefit
and defined contribution pension plan
will disclose both an existing inventory
and newly created periodic actuarial
reports (‘‘actuarial reports’’), quarterly,
semiannual, or annual financial reports
(‘‘financial reports’’), and amortization
extension requests filed with the IRS
(hereafter ‘‘extension requests’’).5
In developing burden estimates, the
Department has taken into account the
total estimated hours required to copy,
mail, and contract with a service
professional to redact individually
identifiable and proprietary information
from the reports.
With respect to an existing inventory
of reports, the Department estimates that
multiemployer defined benefit plans
will receive 169,000 requests to disclose
existing financial reports (an average of
110 per plan), 76,000 requests for
existing actuarial reports (an average of
50 per plan), and 340 requests for
existing amortization requests (an
average of .22 per plan), and defined
contribution plans will receive 96,000
requests for existing financial reports
(an average of 70 per plan). Therefore,
the Department estimates that
multiemployer pension plans would
receive a total of 341,000 requests for
disclosures of existing inventory of
reports.
The Department estimates that the
total hour burden associated with
4 All dollar or hour numbers in this burden
analysis have been rounded to either the nearest
thousand or the nearest hundred, as appropriate.
5 For purposes of this estimate, the Department
assumes that plans will receive no requests for
documents in existing inventory for years prior to
2002.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
disclosing existing documents upon
request over the 2008–2010 period will
be 66,000 hours. This would include
61,000 clerical hours to log requests and
to locate, copy, and mail paper
disclosures 6 and 5,000 of legal hours
(1.8 hours per plan for financial reports,
.7 hours for actuarial reports, and 0
hours for extension requests) 7 to redact
individually identifiable and
proprietary information.8 The
equivalent costs of these hours are $2.1
million.9
For purposes of this analysis, the
Department assumes that 40% of the
existing documents would be requested
in the year of implementation, 30% in
the second year, and 15% in the third
year, with the remaining 15% of
disclosures of existing documents
occurring after 2010.10 Based on this
allocation, the first year hour burden is
estimated to be 56,000 hours ($1.7
million equivalent cost), the second year
hour burden would be 49,000 hours
($1.5 million equivalent cost), and the
third year burden would be 37,000
hours ($1.1 million equivalent cost).
With respect to newly created reports,
the Department estimates that
multiemployer defined benefit plans
will receive 107,000 requests to disclose
newly created financial reports (an
average of 70 per plan), 32,000 requests
for newly created actuarial reports (an
average of 21 per plan), and 1,600
requests for newly created amortization
requests (an average of one per plan),
and defined contribution plans will
receive 82,000 requests for newly
6 This is the product of the total documents
disclosed times the percentage of documents
disclosed on paper times 15 minutes (to locate,
copy, and mail paper documents).
7 The Department estimates that 70% of the
requested documents will be redacted by outside
legal counsel, and that 30% of financial reports and
25% of actuarial reports will require redaction.
8 The Department estimates that 20% of existing
financial reports and actuarial reports for defined
benefit plans will be available electronically, 50%
of existing extension requests for such plans will be
available electronically, and 20% of existing
defined contribution plan financial reports will be
available electronically. The Department invites
comments on this estimate. Documents are assumed
to be disclosed on paper unless the requester has
access to e-mail and requests a document that
already exists in paper form.
9 Hourly wage estimates were based on data from
the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational
Employment Survey (November 30, 2004) and the
2005 Employment Cost Trends. Total labor costs
(wages plus benefits plus overhead) for clerical staff
were estimated to average $25 per hour over the
period based on metropolitan wage rates for
Executive Secretaries and Administrative
Assistants. Total labor cost for legal staff was
estimated to average $109 per hour based on
metropolitan wage estimates for attorneys.
10 This assumption is based on the expectation
that interest in receiving existing documents will be
high in the initial year of implementation and
gradually decrease in subsequent years.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52531
created financial reports (an average of
60 per plan). Therefore, the Department
estimates that multiemployer pension
plans would receive a total of 223,000
requests for disclosures of newly created
reports.
The Department estimates that the
total hour burden associated with
disclosing newly created documents
upon request is 25,000 hours. This
includes 24,000 clerical hours to copy
and mail paper disclosures and 1,200
legal hours to redact individually
identifiable and proprietary
information. The equivalent costs of
these hours are $744,000.
Annual Cost Burden
The costs arising from this
information collection derive from the
direct costs of distributing the reports.
As discussed above, the Department
believes that a substantial number of the
existing documents will be available
only in paper form; therefore, costs will
be incurred to copy and to distribute the
reports by mail.11 Some plans also will
incur costs to hire a service provider to
review the reports and redact
individually identifiable and
proprietary information from them.
The proposed rule allows plans to
charge requesters for the reasonable
costs of furnishing documents in an
amount that does not exceed the lesser
of the actual cost to the plan to furnish
the document, or 25 cents per page plus
the cost of mailing or otherwise
delivering the requested document. The
proposed rule does not allow plans to
charge for redaction costs. The extent to
which plans will impose such charges
has not been estimated, but the
Department has estimated the amount
these charges would reimburse plans for
their direct dollar cost if plans were to
consistently charge requesters for all
allowable charges. Because copy costs
will generally not exceed 25 cents per
page, the proceeds from these charges,
if imposed, would reimburse plans for
all mailing costs, for nearly all copy
costs, and for an estimated 60 percent of
the total dollar burden expected over
the 2008–2010 period.
With respect to the existing inventory
of documents for multiemployer defined
benefit plans, the Department estimates
copying costs of $791,000 for the
existing inventory of financial reports,12
11 See
footnote 9 above.
copying cost estimate is based on a $5.84
average per document cost of disclosure of financial
reports (estimated 40 pages per document times
$0.15 average copying cost per page), $2.80 for
actuarial reports (estimated 50 pages per document
times $0.06 average copying cost per page), $0.24
for extension requests (estimated 12 pages per
12 The
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
Continued
14SEP1
52532
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
$171,000 for the existing inventory of
actuarial reports, $41 for the existing
inventory of extension requests. For
multiemployer defined contribution
plans, estimated copying costs for
existing financial reports is $455,000.
Therefore, the total copying costs for the
existing inventory of all reports would
be $1.4 million.
The Department estimates mailing
costs of $271,000 to deliver the existing
inventory of financial reports, $152,000
to deliver the existing actuarial reports,
and $129 to deliver existing extension
requests.13 Multiemployer defined
contribution plans will incur an
estimated $157,000 of mailing costs to
deliver existing financial reports.
Therefore, the total mailing costs for the
existing inventory of all reports is
estimated to be $581,000.
The costs to redact individually
identifiable and proprietary information
from the existing inventory of financial
reports are $702,000 and from the
existing inventory of actuarial reports
are $263,000. The Department estimates
that no costs will be incurred for
redacting information from the existing
inventory of amortization extensions.
For multiemployer defined contribution
plans, the redaction costs for existing
financial reports are $628,000.
Therefore, the total redaction costs for
the existing inventory of all reports are
$1.6 million.
With respect to newly created reports
for multiemployer defined benefit plans,
the Department estimates that the
annual cost for all plans to copy the
newly created financial reports would
be $212,000, the newly created actuarial
reports would be $30,000, and the
newly created amortization extension
requests would be $21.14 For
multiemployer defined contribution
plans, the copy cost for newly created
financial reports would be $176,000.
Therefore, the total copying costs for all
document times $0.02 average copying cost per
page), and $5.84 for defined contribution plan
financial reports (estimated 50 pages per document
times $0.15 average copying cost per page). The
average copying costs per page takes into account
the estimated percentage of documents that are in
color, and will, therefore, require more expensive
color copying. The Department assumes that 70%
of financial reports and 20% of actuarial reports are
in color, and that 0% of extension requests are in
color.
13 The negligible cost for all plans to mail
extension requests results from the interaction of
various assumptions regarding these documents—a
low request rate, a high rate of electronic disclosure,
and a relatively low mailing cost arising from the
modest length of these documents.
14 The negligible cost for all plans to copy
amortization requests results from a combination of
assumptions about these documents—a low request
rate, a high rate of electronic disclosure, and a low
cost of copying a modest number of black and white
pages.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
newly created reports would be
$416,000.
The costs to mail the newly created
financial reports would be $73,000,
newly created actuarial reports would
be $27,000, and newly created
amortization extension requests would
be $66. For multiemployer defined
contribution plans, the mailing costs for
newly created financial reports would
be $55,000. Therefore, the total mailing
costs for newly created reports would be
$155,000.
The estimated costs of contract
work 15 to redact individually
identifiable and proprietary information
for newly created financial reports
would be $140,000 and $44,000 for
newly created actuarial reports. The
Department estimates that no costs will
be incurred for redacting information
from newly created amortization
extension requests. For multiemployer
defined contribution plans, the
redaction cost for newly created
financial reports is estimated to be
$126,000. Therefore, the total annual
redaction costs for all newly created
reports are estimated to be $310,000.
Type of Review: New collection.
Agency: Department of Labor,
Employee Benefits Security
Administration.
Title: Multiemployer Pension Plan
Information Made Available on Request.
OMB Number: 1210–NEW.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; business or other for-profit;
not-for-profit institutions.
Respondents: 2,905.
Frequency of Response: Occasionally.
Responses: 960,000.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
56,000 (first year); 49,000 (second year);
37,000 (third year).
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden:
$2.3 million (first year); $2.0 million
(second year); $1.4 million (third year).
OMB will consider comments
submitted in response to this request in
its review of the request for approval of
the ICR; these comments will also
become a matter of public record.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA) imposes
certain requirements with respect to
Federal rules that are subject to the
notice and comment requirements of
section 553(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.) and
which are likely to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Unless an
agency certifies that a proposed rule is
15 The Department has assumed that 70% of
redaction work will be contracted.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
not likely to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, section 603 of RFA requires
that the agency present an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis at the time
of the publication of the notice of
proposed rulemaking describing the
impact of the rule on small entities and
seeking public comment on such
impact. Small entities include small
businesses, organizations and
governmental jurisdictions.
The Department has deemed that an
employee benefit plan shall be
considered a small entity if it has fewer
than 100 participants.16 By this
standard, forthcoming data from the
EBSA Private Pension Bulletin 2004
show that only 291 multiemployer
pension plans or 10% of all
multiemployer pension plans are small
entities. The Department does not
consider this to be a substantial number
of small entities. Therefore, pursuant to
section 605(b) of RFA, the Department
hereby certifies that the proposed rule is
not likely to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
To the Department’s knowledge, there
are no federal regulations that might
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the
proposed regulation under section
101(k) of ERISA.
Congressional Review Act
The rule being issued here is subject
to the Congressional Review Act
provisions of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) and, if
finalized, will be transmitted to
Congress and the Comptroller General
for review. The rule is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as that term is defined in 5 U.S.C.
804, because it is not likely to result in
(1) an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more; (2) a major
increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, or
Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; or (3)
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4), as well as Executive Order
16 The basis for this definition is found in section
104(a)(2) of the Act, which permits the Secretary of
Labor to prescribe simplified annual reports for
pension plans that cover fewer than 100
participants.
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Proposed Rules
12875, the rule does not include any
Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures by State, local, or tribal
governments, and does not impose an
annual burden exceeding $100 million
on the private sector.
26 U.S.C. 401 note, 111 Stat. 788. Sec.
2520.101–4 also issued under sec. 103 of
Pub. L. 108–218. Sec. 2520.101–6 also issued
under sec. 502, Pub. L. 109–280, 120 Stat.
780.
Federalism Statement
Executive Order 13132 (August 4,
1999) outlines fundamental principles
of federalism and requires the
adherence to specific criteria by Federal
agencies in the process of their
formulation and implementation of
policies that have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. The
proposal does not have federalism
implications because it has no
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Section 514 of the
Act provides, with certain exceptions
specifically enumerated that are not
pertinent here, that the provisions of
Titles I and IV of the Act supersede any
and all laws of the States as they relate
to any employee benefit plan covered
under Act. The requirements of the
proposal would not alter the
fundamental reporting and disclosure
requirements of the statute with respect
to employee benefit plans, and as such
have no implications for the States or
the relationship or distribution of power
between the national government and
the States.
2. Add and reserve § 2520.101–5 of
subpart A.
3. Add § 2520.101–6 to subpart A to
read as follows:
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 2520
Accounting, Employee benefit plans,
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act, Pensions, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of Labor
proposes to amend 29 CFR part 2520 as
follows:
PART 2520—RULES AND
REGULATIONS FOR REPORTING AND
DISCLOSURE
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
1. The authority citation for part 2520
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1021–1025, 1027,
1029–31, 1059, 1134 and 1135; and Secretary
of Labor’s Order 1–2003, 68 FR 5374 (Feb. 3,
2003). Sec. 2520.101–2 also issued under 29
U.S.C. 1132, 1181–1183, 1181 note, 1185,
1185a–b, 1191, and 1191a–c. Secs. 2520.102–
3, 2520.104b–1 and 2520.104b–3 also issued
under 29 U.S.C. 1003, 1181–1183, 1181 note,
1185, 1185a–b, 1191, and 1191a–c. Secs.
2520.104b–1 and 2520.107 also issued under
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
§ 2520.101–5
[Reserved]
§ 2520.101–6 Multiemployer Pension Plan
Information Made Available on Request.
(a) In general. For purposes of
compliance with the requirements of
section 101(k) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,
as amended (the Act), 29 U.S.C. 1001, et
seq., the administrator of a
multiemployer pension plan shall, in
accordance with the requirements of
this section, furnish copies of actuarial,
financial and funding-related
documents described in paragraph (c) of
this section to plan participants,
beneficiaries, employee representatives
and contributing employers, described
in paragraph (d) of this section.
(b) Obligation to furnish. (1) Subject
to paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of this
section, the administrator of a
multiemployer pension plan shall, not
later than 30 days after receipt of a
written request for a document or
documents described in paragraph (c) of
this section from a plan participant,
beneficiary, employee representative or
contributing employer described in
paragraph (d) of this section, furnish the
requested document or documents to
the requester.
(2) The plan administrator shall
furnish documents pursuant to
paragraph (b)(1) of this section in a
manner consistent with the
requirements of 29 CFR 2520.104b–1,
including paragraph (c) of that section
relating to the use of electronic media.
(3) Nothing in this section shall
require a plan administrator to furnish
to any requester a document described
in paragraph (c) of this section more
than once during any 12-month period.
(4) The plan administrator may
impose a reasonable charge to cover the
costs of furnishing documents pursuant
to this section, but in no event may such
charge exceed—
(i) The lesser of: (A) the actual cost to
the plan for the least expensive means
of acceptable reproduction of the
document(s) or (B) 25 cents per page;
plus
(ii) The cost of mailing or delivery of
the document.
(c) Documents to be furnished. (1) For
purposes of paragraph (a) of this section,
and subject to paragraph (b) of this
section, a plan participant, beneficiary,
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52533
employee representative or contributing
employer described in paragraph (d) of
this section, shall be entitled to request
and receive a copy of any:
(i) Periodic actuarial report (including
any sensitivity testing) received by the
plan for any plan year which has been
in the plan’s possession for at least 30
days prior to the date of the written
request;
(ii) Quarterly, semi-annual, or annual
financial report prepared for the plan by
any plan investment manager or advisor
(without regard to whether such advisor
is a fiduciary within the meaning of
section 3(21) of the Act) or other
fiduciary which has been in the plan’s
possession for at least 30 days prior to
the date of the written request; and
(iii) Application filed with the
Secretary of the Treasury requesting an
extension under section 304 of this Act
or section 431(d) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 and the
determination of such Secretary
pursuant to such application.
(2) For purposes of this section, the
document(s) required to be disclosed
shall not include:
(i) Any information or data which
served as the basis for any report or
application described in paragraph
(c)(1) of this section, although nothing
herein shall limit any other right that a
person may have to review or obtain
such information under the Act; or
(ii) Any information that the plan
administrator reasonably determines to
be either: (A) individually identifiable
information regarding any plan
participant, beneficiary, employee,
fiduciary, or contributing employer, or
(B) proprietary information regarding
the plan, any contributing employer, or
entity providing services to the plan. A
plan administrator shall inform the
requester if the plan administrator
withholds any such information
included within a request under
paragraph (b) of this section.
(d) Persons entitled to request
documents. For purposes of this section,
a plan participant, beneficiary,
employee representative or contributing
employer entitled to request and receive
documents includes:
(1) Any participant within the
meaning of section 3(7) of the Act;
(2) Any beneficiary receiving benefits
under the plan;
(3) Any labor organization
representing participants under the
plan;
(4) Any employer that is a party to the
collective bargaining agreement(s)
pursuant to which the plan is
maintained or who otherwise may be
subject to withdrawal liability pursuant
to section 4203 of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
52534
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Proposed Rules
4. Amend § 2520.104b-30 to revise
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 2520.104b-30
You may mail comments
and related material to Commander,
Sector North Carolina, 2301 East Fort
Macon Road, Atlantic Beach, NC 28512.
Sector North Carolina maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the Federal
Building Fifth Coast Guard District
between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
ADDRESSES:
Charges for documents.
(a) Application. The plan
administrator of an employee benefit
plan may impose a reasonable charge to
cover the cost of furnishing to
participants and beneficiaries upon
their written request as required under
section 104(b)(4) of the Act, copies of
the following information, statements or
documents: The latest updated
summary plan description, and the
latest annual report, any terminal report,
the bargaining agreement, trust
agreement, contract, or other
instruments under which the plan is
established or operated. Except where
explicitly permitted under the Act, no
charge may be assessed for furnishing
information, statements or documents as
required by other provisions of the Act,
which include, in part 1 of title I,
sections 104(b)(1), (2), (3) and (c) and
105(a) and (c).
*
*
*
*
*
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
September, 2007.
Bradford P. Campbell,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, Department of
Labor.
[FR Doc. E7–18073 Filed 9–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
MSTC Todd C. Mann, Marine
Environmental Response Branch, Coast
Guard Marine Safety Unit, Wilmington,
North Carolina at (910) 772–2216.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking CGD05–07–088,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
[Docket No. CGD05–07–088]
Public Meeting
RIN 1625–AA00
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to Commander,
Sector North Carolina at the address
under ADDRESSES explaining why one
would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
Safety Zone: Holiday Flotilla Fireworks
Display, Motts Channel/Banks
Channel, Wrightsville Beach, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes the
establishment of a 1000 foot safety zone
around a fireworks display for the North
Carolina Holiday Flotilla occurring on
November 24, 2007, in the vicinity of
Motts Channel/Banks Channel and
Wrightsville Beach, NC. This action is
intended to restrict vessel traffic on
Motts Channel. This safety zone is
necessary to protect mariners from the
hazards associated with fireworks
displays.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
October 10, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:28 Sep 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Background and Purpose
On November 24, 2007, the North
Carolina Holiday Flotilla fireworks
display will be held adjacent to Motts
Channel/Banks Channel, Wrightsville
Beach, NC. Spectators will be observing
from both the shore and from vessels.
Due to the need of protection of
mariners and spectators from the
hazards associated with the fireworks
display, vessel traffic will be
temporarily restricted.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone on specified waters of Motts
Channel. The regulated area will consist
of a 1000 foot safety zone around Bird
Island position 34–12–42N 077–48–26W
south of the Seapath Yacht Club,
Wrightsville Beach, NC. The safety zone
will be enforced from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.
on November 24, 2007. General
navigation in the safety zone will be
restricted during the event. Except for
participants and vessels authorized by
the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
Although this regulation restricts
access to the regulated area, the effect of
this rule will not be significant because:
(i) The COTP may authorize access to
the safety zone; (ii) the safety zone will
be in effect for a limited duration; and
(iii) the Coast Guard will make
notifications via maritime advisories so
mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners and operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
that portion of Motts Channel/Banks
Channel from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. on
November 24, 2007. The safety zone
E:\FR\FM\14SEP1.SGM
14SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 178 (Friday, September 14, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52527-52534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-18073]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
29 CFR Part 2520
RIN 1210-AB21
Multi-Employer Pension Plan Information Made Available on Request
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains a proposed regulation that, upon
adoption, would implement amendments to the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA or the Act), requiring the
administrator of a multi-employer plan to provide copies of certain
actuarial and financial information about the plan to participants and
others upon request. The amendments, enacted by the Pension Protection
Act of 2006, added subsection (k) to section 101 of ERISA. The proposed
regulation would affect plan administrators, participants and
beneficiaries of multi-employer plans, as well as employee
representatives of such participants and employers that have an
obligation to contribute to such plans.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed regulation should be received
by the Department of Labor on or before October 15, 2007.
ADDRESSES: To facilitate the receipt and processing of comments, the
Department encourages interested persons to submit their comments
electronically by e-mail to e-ORI@dol.gov, or by using the Federal
eRulemaking portal at www.regulations.gov (follow
[[Page 52528]]
instructions for submission of comments). Persons submitting comments
electronically are encouraged not to submit paper copies. Persons
interested in submitting comments on paper should send or deliver their
comments (at least three copies) to the Office of Regulations and
Interpretations, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room N-
5669, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210, Attention: ERISA 101(k) Regulation. Comments
received will be posted without change to www.regulations.gov and
www.dol.gov/ebsa, and available for public inspection at the Public
Disclosure Room, N-1513, Employee Benefits Security Administration, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210, including any personal
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie L. Ward, Office of
Regulations and Interpretations, Employee Benefits Security
Administration, (202) 693-8500. This is not a toll-free number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
Section 502(a)(1) of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, Public Law
109-280, 120 Stat. 780 (PPA), which was enacted on August 17, 2006,
amended the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
(ERISA or the Act), by adding section 101(k). Section 101(k)(1) of
ERISA requires the administrator of a multi-employer pension plan, upon
written request, to furnish certain documents to any plan participant,
beneficiary, employee representative, or any employer that has an
obligation to contribute to the plan. The documents that are required
to be furnished are: (A) A copy of any periodic actuarial report
(including sensitivity testing) received by the plan for any plan year
which has been in the plan's possession for at least 30 days; (B) a
copy of any quarterly, semi-annual, or annual financial report prepared
for the plan by any plan investment manager or advisor or other
fiduciary which has been in the plan's possession for at least 30 days;
and (C) a copy of any application filed with the Secretary of the
Treasury requesting an extension under section 304 of the Act (or
section 431(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) and the
determination of such Secretary pursuant to such application.
Section 502(a)(2) of the PPA amended section 502(c)(4) of ERISA to
provide that the Secretary of Labor may assess a civil penalty of not
more than $1,000 a day for each violation of section 101(k). Section
502(a)(3) of the PPA provides that the Secretary of Labor shall
prescribe regulations under section 101(k)(2) not later than one year
after the date of enactment of the PPA. Section 502(d) of the PPA
provides that section 101(k) shall apply to plan years beginning after
December 31, 2007.
B. Overview of Proposed Regulation
Included in this notice is a proposed regulation that, upon
adoption, would implement the new disclosure requirement under section
101(k) of the Act. Interested parties are invited to comment on all
aspects of the regulation. The Department intends to publish a separate
regulation implementing the Secretary's authority to assess civil
penalties under section 502(c)(4) of ERISA at a later date.
Paragraph (a) of the proposed regulation provides that the
administrator of a multi-employer pension plan shall furnish copies of
actuarial, financial and funding-related documents to certain persons
who make written requests to the plan.
For purposes of paragraph (a), a person entitled to request and
receive documents is any participant within the meaning of section 3(7)
of the Act; any beneficiary receiving benefits under the plan; any
labor organization representing participants under the plan; or any
employer that is a party to the collective bargaining agreement(s)
pursuant to which the plan is maintained or who otherwise may be
subject to withdrawal liability pursuant to section 4203 of the Act.
See Sec. 2520.101-6(d). In this regard, the phrase ``any employer that
has an obligation to contribute to the plan'' under section 101(k) of
the Act has been construed under paragraph (d)(4) of the proposed
regulation in a manner that is consistent with the construction given
to similar language under section 101(f) of ERISA, which relates to
annual funding notices of multi-employer defined benefit pension
plans.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 29 CFR 2520.101-4(f)(4); 71 FR 1904, Jan. 11, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paragraph (b)(1) of the proposed regulation provides that the plan
administrator must furnish the requested document or documents to the
requester not later than 30 days after the date the written request is
received by the plan, subject to the limitations in paragraphs (b)(3)
and (b)(4).
Paragraph (b)(3) of the proposed regulation provides that a plan
administrator is not required to furnish to any requester more than one
copy of a document described in paragraph (c) during any 12-month
period. Thus, an eligible requester would not be entitled to receive
more than one copy of the same financial report within a 12-month
period. This limitation, however, does not mean that an eligible
requester would not be entitled to request and receive copies of two
different reports (e.g., one financial report and one actuarial report)
during any 12-month period. For purposes of the application of this 12-
month limitation, the Department is of the view that the 12-month
period commences from the earlier of the date the plan actually
responds to a request or the 30th day referenced in paragraph (b)(1) of
the regulation.
Paragraph (b)(4) of the proposed regulation permits the plan
administrator to charge the requester for the reasonable costs of
furnishing documents. The PPA specifically authorizes the Department to
prescribe in regulations the maximum amount that would be considered a
reasonable charge for furnishing documents under this section. For this
purpose, the Department proposes that a reasonable charge may not
exceed the lesser of the actual cost to the plan for the least
expensive means of acceptable reproduction of the document, or 25 cents
per page, plus the cost of mailing or otherwise delivering the
requested document. This standard adopts the existing reasonable charge
standard under 29 CFR 2520.104b-30, but also permits the plan
administrator to charge the requester the actual cost to the plan of
mailing or delivering the document or information.
Paragraph (b)(2) provides that such documents must be furnished in
a manner consistent with the general furnishing requirements set forth
in 29 CFR 2520.104b-1 including the use of electronic media. See Sec.
2520.104b-1(c). In this regard, wherever possible, the Department
encourages plan administrators to use electronic media to furnish
requested information in order to reduce compliance costs under the
regulation.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ As part of a separate rulemaking initiative, the Department
is undertaking a review of the rules in paragraph (c) of Sec.
2520.104b-1 relating to disclosure through electronic media. The
Department is reviewing these rules in light of advances in
technology and new disclosure requirements under ERISA following
enactment of the PPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paragraph (c) of the proposed regulation delineates the documents
that must be disclosed pursuant to section 101(k). Paragraph (c)(1)
provides that information subject to the disclosure requirement in
paragraph (a) consists of a copy of any periodic
[[Page 52529]]
actuarial report (including any sensitivity testing) received by the
plan that has been in the plan's possession for at least 30 days before
the plan receives the written request; a copy of any quarterly, semi-
annual, or annual financial report prepared for the plan by any plan
investment manager or advisor (without regard to whether such advisor
is a fiduciary within the meaning of section 3(21) of the Act) or other
fiduciary which has been in the plan's possession for at least 30 days
before the plan receives the written request; and a copy of any
application filed by the plan sponsor with the Secretary of the
Treasury requesting an amortization extension under section 304 of the
Act or section 431(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the
determination of such Secretary pursuant to such application.
To provide plan administrators with clarity regarding their
disclosure obligations under section 101(k), the proposed regulation
clarifies that financial reports prepared by advisors are subject to
disclosure without regard to whether the advisor or advisors are
fiduciaries within the meaning of section 3(21) of ERISA. See Sec.
2520.101-6(c)(1)(ii). The Department specifically requests comments on
whether this clarification alone provides sufficient certainty as to
what financial reports are required to be disclosed, or, whether, in
addition, the term ``financial report'' should also be clarified in
regulation and, if so, how.
Paragraph (c)(2) provides that documents required to be disclosed
under the regulation shall not include certain information. In this
regard, paragraph (c)(2)(i) provides that required disclosures do not
include the information or data which served as the basis for such
report or application, e.g., the data behind or underlying a report or
application. In addition, paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of the proposed
regulation provides that disclosed reports or applications shall not
include any information that the plan administrator reasonably
determines to be either individually identifiable information regarding
any plan participant, beneficiary, employee, fiduciary, or contributing
employer, or proprietary information regarding the plan, any
contributing employer, or entity providing services to the plan. The
Department specifically invites comment on whether clarification is
needed with respect to determinations regarding what information should
be considered ``proprietary'' or ``individually identifiable'' in this
context and, if so, what standards should govern such determinations.
In this regard, paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of the proposed rule clarifies
that, in responding to a request under the regulation, a plan
administrator is required to inform the requester if the plan
administrator withholds any information determined to be
``proprietary'' or ``individually identifiable'' within the meaning of
the restrictions in paragraph (c)(2) of the proposed regulation.
Along with the proposed regulation under section 101(k), discussed
above, this notice also includes amendments to 29 CFR 2520.104b-30,
which provides guidelines for assessing a reasonable charge for
furnishing plan documents pursuant to section 104(b)(4) of the Act
(e.g., latest updated summary plan description, latest annual report,
any terminal report, etc.). Language in Sec. 2520.104b-30 could be
construed as contrary to specific language in section 101(k) of ERISA,
Sec. 2520.101-6, and other PPA provisions amending title I of ERISA
that expressly permit plan administrators to impose reasonable charges
on requesters for the cost of furnishing the requested information,
including handling and postage charges. Accordingly, minor conforming
amendments are being proposed to paragraph (a) of Sec. 2520.104b-30 to
eliminate any ambiguity that may be caused by current Sec. 2520.104b-
30.
C. Regulatory Impact Analysis
Summary
The proposed rule contains guidance necessary to implement the
amendments made by new section 101(k) of the Act, as enacted by section
502(a)(1) of the PPA, which requires multiemployer plan administrators
to provide, upon written request, copies of certain actuarial and
financial reports about the plan to participants, beneficiaries,
employee representatives, or any employer that has an obligation to
contribute to the plan.
This disclosure requirement of PPA was enacted because more
complete disclosures were considered an important element of measures
enacted in PPA to strengthen the long-term health of the multiemployer
plan pension system. Providing participants and beneficiaries, employee
representatives, and contributing employers with greater access to
actuarial and financial information regarding their plans will increase
the transparency of the operation of multiemployer pension plans and
afford all parties interested in the financial viability of such plans
greater opportunity to monitor their funding and financial status and
to take appropriate action when necessary.
By clarifying certain terms used in section 101(k) of the Act, this
regulation will also permit multiemployer plan administrators to
fulfill their disclosure responsibilities under this section with
greater certainty and less cost. The increase in transparency of plan
operations may also contribute to an atmosphere of greater
accountability on the part of plan officials. These benefits have not
been quantified.
The cost of the multiemployer plan disclosure requirement under
section 101(k) of the Act and the rule is expected to total
approximately $2.3 million in the year of implementation, $2.0 million
in the second year, and $1.4 million in the third year. These costs
arise from logging in disclosure requests, copying and mailing the
reports, and contracting for redacting individually identifiable and
proprietary information from the reports. In addition, multiemployer
plans will devote in-house staff time to complying with this
regulation. The total hour burden is estimated to be 56,000 hours in
2008, 49,000 in 2009 and 37,000 in 2010. Both the dollar burden and the
hour burden are projected to fall over the three-year period as
interest in the aging inventory of existing documents subject to this
regulation wanes. The dollar equivalent of the three-year hour burden
is estimated to be $4.4 million.
Because the costs of the proposed regulation arise from notice
provisions in the PPA, the data and methodology used in developing
these estimates are more fully described in the Paperwork Reduction Act
section of this analysis of regulatory impact.
Executive Order 12866 Statement
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735), the Department must
determine whether a regulatory action is ``significant'' and therefore
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Section
3(f) of the Executive Order defines a ``significant regulatory action''
as an action that is likely to result in a rule (1) having an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and
materially affecting a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State,
local or tribal governments or communities (also referred to as
``economically significant''); (2) creating a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfering with an action taken or planned by another
agency; (3) materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement
[[Page 52530]]
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raising novel legal or policy issues arising
out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order. Although the Department believes that
this regulatory action is not economically significant within the
meaning of section 3(f)(1) of the Executive Order, the action has been
determined to be significant within the meaning of section 3(f)(4) of
the Executive Order, and the Department accordingly provides the
following assessment of its potential costs and benefits. As elaborated
below, the Department believes that the benefits of the rule justify
its costs.
In assessing the costs and benefits of the rule and associated
provisions of the Act, the Department endeavored to consider all of the
major activities that will be carried out pursuant to them. For
example, multiemployer pension plan administrators will have to make
arrangements for copying and mailing the reports and redacting
individually identifiable and proprietary information from the reports.
Because the regulation does not require the creation of any new
documents, the costs of the rule are limited to those arising from
logging in requests and from copying, mailing and redacting disclosed
reports.
The Department estimates that the total cost \3\ for all
multiemployer plans to comply with the regulation will average $1,200
per plan year over the 2008-2010 periods. Given that total 2004 assets
of multiemployer pension plans averaged about $247 million in defined
benefit plans and $50 million in defined contribution plans, this
annual cost is approximately 0.0012% of average plan assets in defined
benefit plans and 0.0061% of assets in defined contribution plans. The
Department believes that the transparency contained in the rule and
associated section 101(k) of the Act will provide participants,
beneficiaries, employee representatives, and contributing employers
with important information regarding the funding and financial status
of multiemployer pension plans. These disclosures will allow
participants, beneficiaries, employee representatives, and contributing
employers to learn more about the financial status of their plans and
take action where appropriate. Although the benefits of this increased
transparency have not been quantified, the Department has concluded
that these benefits of the rule outweigh its modest costs. The
Department invites comments on this assessment and its conclusions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Total cost is the sum of the dollar burden and the dollar
equivalent of the hour burden.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paperwork Reduction Act
As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, the Department of Labor conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public and federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing collections of
information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA
95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This helps to ensure that requested data
can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents
can be properly assessed.
Currently, EBSA is soliciting comments concerning the proposed
information collection request (ICR) included in the Proposed
Regulation on Multiemployer Pension Plan Information Made Available on
Request. A copy of the ICR may be obtained by contacting the PRA
addressee shown below.
The Department has submitted a copy of the proposed rule to OMB in
accordance with 44 U.S.C. 3507(d) for review of its information
collections. The Department and OMB are particularly interested in
comments that:
Evaluate whether the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Comments should be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; Attention: Desk Officer for the
Employee Benefits Security Administration. OMB requests that comments
be received within 30 days of publication of the proposed regulation to
ensure their consideration.
PRA Addressee: Address requests for copies of the ICR to Joseph S.
Piacentini, Office of Policy and Research, U.S. Department of Labor,
Employee Benefits Security Administration, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Room N-5647, Washington, DC 20210. Telephone (202) 693-8410; Fax:
(202) 219-5333. These are not toll-free numbers.
The proposed regulation would, upon adoption, implement the
disclosure requirements of new section 101(k) of the Act, as added by
section 502(a)(1) of the PPA. As described earlier in the preamble,
section 101(k)(1) of the Act requires multiemployer plan
administrators, upon written request, to furnish certain documents to
any plan participant, beneficiary, employee representative, or any
employer that has an obligation to contribute to the plan. The
documents that may be requested are (1) a copy of any periodic
actuarial report (including sensitivity testing) received by the plan
for any plan year which has been in the plan's possession for at least
30 days; (2) a copy of any quarterly, semi-annual, or annual financial
report prepared for the plan by any plan investment manager or advisor
or other fiduciary that has been in the plan's possession for at least
30 days; and (3) a copy of any application filed with the Secretary of
the Treasury requesting an extension under section 304 of the Act (or
section 431(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) and the
determination of such Secretary pursuant to such application.
The information collection provisions of this proposed rule are
found in section 2520.101-6(a) of the proposed rule, which requires
multiemployer defined benefit and defined contribution pension plan
administrators to furnish copies of actuarial, financial, and funding
related documents to plan participants, beneficiaries, employee
representatives, and contributing employers upon request. This
information constitutes a third-party disclosure from the administrator
to participants, beneficiaries, employee representatives, and
contributing employers. Pursuant to section 2520.101-6(c)(2) the
documents required to be disclosed shall not contain any information
that the plan administrator reasonably determines to be either: (i)
Individually identifiable information regarding any plan participant,
beneficiary, employee, fiduciary, or contributing employer, or (ii)
proprietary information regarding the plan, any contributing employer,
or entity providing services to the plan.
[[Page 52531]]
The plan administrator must inform the requester if any such
information is withheld.
Annual Hour Burden
In order to estimate the potential costs of the disclosure
provisions of section 101(k) of the Act and this proposed rule, the
Department estimated the number of multiemployer defined benefit and
defined contribution pension plans. Based on data derived exclusively
from the Form 5500 for the 2004 plan year, which is the most recent
year for which complete data are available, the Department estimates
that there are 1,533 multiemployer defined benefit plans \4\ and 1,372
multiemployer defined contribution plans that would be subject to this
disclosure requirement. Because section 101(k) of the Act and the
regulation generally do not limit the class of documents that can be
requested in any way by date of creation or receipt, the Department has
assumed for purposes of this estimate that each multiemployer defined
benefit and defined contribution pension plan will disclose both an
existing inventory and newly created periodic actuarial reports
(``actuarial reports''), quarterly, semiannual, or annual financial
reports (``financial reports''), and amortization extension requests
filed with the IRS (hereafter ``extension requests'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ All dollar or hour numbers in this burden analysis have been
rounded to either the nearest thousand or the nearest hundred, as
appropriate.
\5\ For purposes of this estimate, the Department assumes that
plans will receive no requests for documents in existing inventory
for years prior to 2002.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In developing burden estimates, the Department has taken into
account the total estimated hours required to copy, mail, and contract
with a service professional to redact individually identifiable and
proprietary information from the reports.
With respect to an existing inventory of reports, the Department
estimates that multiemployer defined benefit plans will receive 169,000
requests to disclose existing financial reports (an average of 110 per
plan), 76,000 requests for existing actuarial reports (an average of 50
per plan), and 340 requests for existing amortization requests (an
average of .22 per plan), and defined contribution plans will receive
96,000 requests for existing financial reports (an average of 70 per
plan). Therefore, the Department estimates that multiemployer pension
plans would receive a total of 341,000 requests for disclosures of
existing inventory of reports.
The Department estimates that the total hour burden associated with
disclosing existing documents upon request over the 2008-2010 period
will be 66,000 hours. This would include 61,000 clerical hours to log
requests and to locate, copy, and mail paper disclosures \6\ and 5,000
of legal hours (1.8 hours per plan for financial reports, .7 hours for
actuarial reports, and 0 hours for extension requests) \7\ to redact
individually identifiable and proprietary information.\8\ The
equivalent costs of these hours are $2.1 million.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ This is the product of the total documents disclosed times
the percentage of documents disclosed on paper times 15 minutes (to
locate, copy, and mail paper documents).
\7\ The Department estimates that 70% of the requested documents
will be redacted by outside legal counsel, and that 30% of financial
reports and 25% of actuarial reports will require redaction.
\8\ The Department estimates that 20% of existing financial
reports and actuarial reports for defined benefit plans will be
available electronically, 50% of existing extension requests for
such plans will be available electronically, and 20% of existing
defined contribution plan financial reports will be available
electronically. The Department invites comments on this estimate.
Documents are assumed to be disclosed on paper unless the requester
has access to e-mail and requests a document that already exists in
paper form.
\9\ Hourly wage estimates were based on data from the Bureau of
Labor Statistics Occupational Employment Survey (November 30, 2004)
and the 2005 Employment Cost Trends. Total labor costs (wages plus
benefits plus overhead) for clerical staff were estimated to average
$25 per hour over the period based on metropolitan wage rates for
Executive Secretaries and Administrative Assistants. Total labor
cost for legal staff was estimated to average $109 per hour based on
metropolitan wage estimates for attorneys.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For purposes of this analysis, the Department assumes that 40% of
the existing documents would be requested in the year of
implementation, 30% in the second year, and 15% in the third year, with
the remaining 15% of disclosures of existing documents occurring after
2010.\10\ Based on this allocation, the first year hour burden is
estimated to be 56,000 hours ($1.7 million equivalent cost), the second
year hour burden would be 49,000 hours ($1.5 million equivalent cost),
and the third year burden would be 37,000 hours ($1.1 million
equivalent cost).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ This assumption is based on the expectation that interest
in receiving existing documents will be high in the initial year of
implementation and gradually decrease in subsequent years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to newly created reports, the Department estimates
that multiemployer defined benefit plans will receive 107,000 requests
to disclose newly created financial reports (an average of 70 per
plan), 32,000 requests for newly created actuarial reports (an average
of 21 per plan), and 1,600 requests for newly created amortization
requests (an average of one per plan), and defined contribution plans
will receive 82,000 requests for newly created financial reports (an
average of 60 per plan). Therefore, the Department estimates that
multiemployer pension plans would receive a total of 223,000 requests
for disclosures of newly created reports.
The Department estimates that the total hour burden associated with
disclosing newly created documents upon request is 25,000 hours. This
includes 24,000 clerical hours to copy and mail paper disclosures and
1,200 legal hours to redact individually identifiable and proprietary
information. The equivalent costs of these hours are $744,000.
Annual Cost Burden
The costs arising from this information collection derive from the
direct costs of distributing the reports. As discussed above, the
Department believes that a substantial number of the existing documents
will be available only in paper form; therefore, costs will be incurred
to copy and to distribute the reports by mail.\11\ Some plans also will
incur costs to hire a service provider to review the reports and redact
individually identifiable and proprietary information from them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See footnote 9 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule allows plans to charge requesters for the
reasonable costs of furnishing documents in an amount that does not
exceed the lesser of the actual cost to the plan to furnish the
document, or 25 cents per page plus the cost of mailing or otherwise
delivering the requested document. The proposed rule does not allow
plans to charge for redaction costs. The extent to which plans will
impose such charges has not been estimated, but the Department has
estimated the amount these charges would reimburse plans for their
direct dollar cost if plans were to consistently charge requesters for
all allowable charges. Because copy costs will generally not exceed 25
cents per page, the proceeds from these charges, if imposed, would
reimburse plans for all mailing costs, for nearly all copy costs, and
for an estimated 60 percent of the total dollar burden expected over
the 2008-2010 period.
With respect to the existing inventory of documents for
multiemployer defined benefit plans, the Department estimates copying
costs of $791,000 for the existing inventory of financial reports,\12\
[[Page 52532]]
$171,000 for the existing inventory of actuarial reports, $41 for the
existing inventory of extension requests. For multiemployer defined
contribution plans, estimated copying costs for existing financial
reports is $455,000. Therefore, the total copying costs for the
existing inventory of all reports would be $1.4 million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The copying cost estimate is based on a $5.84 average per
document cost of disclosure of financial reports (estimated 40 pages
per document times $0.15 average copying cost per page), $2.80 for
actuarial reports (estimated 50 pages per document times $0.06
average copying cost per page), $0.24 for extension requests
(estimated 12 pages per document times $0.02 average copying cost
per page), and $5.84 for defined contribution plan financial reports
(estimated 50 pages per document times $0.15 average copying cost
per page). The average copying costs per page takes into account the
estimated percentage of documents that are in color, and will,
therefore, require more expensive color copying. The Department
assumes that 70% of financial reports and 20% of actuarial reports
are in color, and that 0% of extension requests are in color.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department estimates mailing costs of $271,000 to deliver the
existing inventory of financial reports, $152,000 to deliver the
existing actuarial reports, and $129 to deliver existing extension
requests.\13\ Multiemployer defined contribution plans will incur an
estimated $157,000 of mailing costs to deliver existing financial
reports. Therefore, the total mailing costs for the existing inventory
of all reports is estimated to be $581,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The negligible cost for all plans to mail extension
requests results from the interaction of various assumptions
regarding these documents--a low request rate, a high rate of
electronic disclosure, and a relatively low mailing cost arising
from the modest length of these documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The costs to redact individually identifiable and proprietary
information from the existing inventory of financial reports are
$702,000 and from the existing inventory of actuarial reports are
$263,000. The Department estimates that no costs will be incurred for
redacting information from the existing inventory of amortization
extensions. For multiemployer defined contribution plans, the redaction
costs for existing financial reports are $628,000. Therefore, the total
redaction costs for the existing inventory of all reports are $1.6
million.
With respect to newly created reports for multiemployer defined
benefit plans, the Department estimates that the annual cost for all
plans to copy the newly created financial reports would be $212,000,
the newly created actuarial reports would be $30,000, and the newly
created amortization extension requests would be $21.\14\ For
multiemployer defined contribution plans, the copy cost for newly
created financial reports would be $176,000. Therefore, the total
copying costs for all newly created reports would be $416,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The negligible cost for all plans to copy amortization
requests results from a combination of assumptions about these
documents--a low request rate, a high rate of electronic disclosure,
and a low cost of copying a modest number of black and white pages.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The costs to mail the newly created financial reports would be
$73,000, newly created actuarial reports would be $27,000, and newly
created amortization extension requests would be $66. For multiemployer
defined contribution plans, the mailing costs for newly created
financial reports would be $55,000. Therefore, the total mailing costs
for newly created reports would be $155,000.
The estimated costs of contract work \15\ to redact individually
identifiable and proprietary information for newly created financial
reports would be $140,000 and $44,000 for newly created actuarial
reports. The Department estimates that no costs will be incurred for
redacting information from newly created amortization extension
requests. For multiemployer defined contribution plans, the redaction
cost for newly created financial reports is estimated to be $126,000.
Therefore, the total annual redaction costs for all newly created
reports are estimated to be $310,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The Department has assumed that 70% of redaction work will
be contracted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of Review: New collection.
Agency: Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security
Administration.
Title: Multiemployer Pension Plan Information Made Available on
Request.
OMB Number: 1210-NEW.
Affected Public: Individuals or households; business or other for-
profit; not-for-profit institutions.
Respondents: 2,905.
Frequency of Response: Occasionally.
Responses: 960,000.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 56,000 (first year); 49,000
(second year); 37,000 (third year).
Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden: $2.3 million (first year); $2.0
million (second year); $1.4 million (third year).
OMB will consider comments submitted in response to this request in
its review of the request for approval of the ICR; these comments will
also become a matter of public record.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA) imposes
certain requirements with respect to Federal rules that are subject to
the notice and comment requirements of section 553(b) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.) and which are
likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. Unless an agency certifies that a proposed rule is not
likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities, section 603 of RFA requires that the agency present an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis at the time of the publication
of the notice of proposed rulemaking describing the impact of the rule
on small entities and seeking public comment on such impact. Small
entities include small businesses, organizations and governmental
jurisdictions.
The Department has deemed that an employee benefit plan shall be
considered a small entity if it has fewer than 100 participants.\16\ By
this standard, forthcoming data from the EBSA Private Pension Bulletin
2004 show that only 291 multiemployer pension plans or 10% of all
multiemployer pension plans are small entities. The Department does not
consider this to be a substantial number of small entities. Therefore,
pursuant to section 605(b) of RFA, the Department hereby certifies that
the proposed rule is not likely to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The basis for this definition is found in section 104(a)(2)
of the Act, which permits the Secretary of Labor to prescribe
simplified annual reports for pension plans that cover fewer than
100 participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the Department's knowledge, there are no federal regulations
that might duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the proposed regulation
under section 101(k) of ERISA.
Congressional Review Act
The rule being issued here is subject to the Congressional Review
Act provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) and, if finalized, will be
transmitted to Congress and the Comptroller General for review. The
rule is not a ``major rule'' as that term is defined in 5 U.S.C. 804,
because it is not likely to result in (1) an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; (2) a major increase in costs or
prices for consumers, individual industries, or Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or geographic regions; or (3) significant
adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of United States-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export markets.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4), as well as Executive Order
[[Page 52533]]
12875, the rule does not include any Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures by State, local, or tribal governments, and does not
impose an annual burden exceeding $100 million on the private sector.
Federalism Statement
Executive Order 13132 (August 4, 1999) outlines fundamental
principles of federalism and requires the adherence to specific
criteria by Federal agencies in the process of their formulation and
implementation of policies that have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. The proposal does not have federalism
implications because it has no substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Section 514 of the Act provides, with certain
exceptions specifically enumerated that are not pertinent here, that
the provisions of Titles I and IV of the Act supersede any and all laws
of the States as they relate to any employee benefit plan covered under
Act. The requirements of the proposal would not alter the fundamental
reporting and disclosure requirements of the statute with respect to
employee benefit plans, and as such have no implications for the States
or the relationship or distribution of power between the national
government and the States.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 2520
Accounting, Employee benefit plans, Employee Retirement Income
Security Act, Pensions, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of Labor
proposes to amend 29 CFR part 2520 as follows:
PART 2520--RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE
1. The authority citation for part 2520 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1021-1025, 1027, 1029-31, 1059, 1134 and
1135; and Secretary of Labor's Order 1-2003, 68 FR 5374 (Feb. 3,
2003). Sec. 2520.101-2 also issued under 29 U.S.C. 1132, 1181-1183,
1181 note, 1185, 1185a-b, 1191, and 1191a-c. Secs. 2520.102-3,
2520.104b-1 and 2520.104b-3 also issued under 29 U.S.C. 1003, 1181-
1183, 1181 note, 1185, 1185a-b, 1191, and 1191a-c. Secs. 2520.104b-1
and 2520.107 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 401 note, 111 Stat. 788.
Sec. 2520.101-4 also issued under sec. 103 of Pub. L. 108-218. Sec.
2520.101-6 also issued under sec. 502, Pub. L. 109-280, 120 Stat.
780.
Sec. 2520.101-5 [Reserved]
2. Add and reserve Sec. 2520.101-5 of subpart A.
3. Add Sec. 2520.101-6 to subpart A to read as follows:
Sec. 2520.101-6 Multiemployer Pension Plan Information Made Available
on Request.
(a) In general. For purposes of compliance with the requirements of
section 101(k) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,
as amended (the Act), 29 U.S.C. 1001, et seq., the administrator of a
multiemployer pension plan shall, in accordance with the requirements
of this section, furnish copies of actuarial, financial and funding-
related documents described in paragraph (c) of this section to plan
participants, beneficiaries, employee representatives and contributing
employers, described in paragraph (d) of this section.
(b) Obligation to furnish. (1) Subject to paragraphs (b)(3) and
(b)(4) of this section, the administrator of a multiemployer pension
plan shall, not later than 30 days after receipt of a written request
for a document or documents described in paragraph (c) of this section
from a plan participant, beneficiary, employee representative or
contributing employer described in paragraph (d) of this section,
furnish the requested document or documents to the requester.
(2) The plan administrator shall furnish documents pursuant to
paragraph (b)(1) of this section in a manner consistent with the
requirements of 29 CFR 2520.104b-1, including paragraph (c) of that
section relating to the use of electronic media.
(3) Nothing in this section shall require a plan administrator to
furnish to any requester a document described in paragraph (c) of this
section more than once during any 12-month period.
(4) The plan administrator may impose a reasonable charge to cover
the costs of furnishing documents pursuant to this section, but in no
event may such charge exceed--
(i) The lesser of: (A) the actual cost to the plan for the least
expensive means of acceptable reproduction of the document(s) or (B) 25
cents per page; plus
(ii) The cost of mailing or delivery of the document.
(c) Documents to be furnished. (1) For purposes of paragraph (a) of
this section, and subject to paragraph (b) of this section, a plan
participant, beneficiary, employee representative or contributing
employer described in paragraph (d) of this section, shall be entitled
to request and receive a copy of any:
(i) Periodic actuarial report (including any sensitivity testing)
received by the plan for any plan year which has been in the plan's
possession for at least 30 days prior to the date of the written
request;
(ii) Quarterly, semi-annual, or annual financial report prepared
for the plan by any plan investment manager or advisor (without regard
to whether such advisor is a fiduciary within the meaning of section
3(21) of the Act) or other fiduciary which has been in the plan's
possession for at least 30 days prior to the date of the written
request; and
(iii) Application filed with the Secretary of the Treasury
requesting an extension under section 304 of this Act or section 431(d)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the determination of such
Secretary pursuant to such application.
(2) For purposes of this section, the document(s) required to be
disclosed shall not include:
(i) Any information or data which served as the basis for any
report or application described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section,
although nothing herein shall limit any other right that a person may
have to review or obtain such information under the Act; or
(ii) Any information that the plan administrator reasonably
determines to be either: (A) individually identifiable information
regarding any plan participant, beneficiary, employee, fiduciary, or
contributing employer, or (B) proprietary information regarding the
plan, any contributing employer, or entity providing services to the
plan. A plan administrator shall inform the requester if the plan
administrator withholds any such information included within a request
under paragraph (b) of this section.
(d) Persons entitled to request documents. For purposes of this
section, a plan participant, beneficiary, employee representative or
contributing employer entitled to request and receive documents
includes:
(1) Any participant within the meaning of section 3(7) of the Act;
(2) Any beneficiary receiving benefits under the plan;
(3) Any labor organization representing participants under the
plan;
(4) Any employer that is a party to the collective bargaining
agreement(s) pursuant to which the plan is maintained or who otherwise
may be subject to withdrawal liability pursuant to section 4203 of the
Act.
[[Page 52534]]
4. Amend Sec. 2520.104b-30 to revise paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 2520.104b-30 Charges for documents.
(a) Application. The plan administrator of an employee benefit plan
may impose a reasonable charge to cover the cost of furnishing to
participants and beneficiaries upon their written request as required
under section 104(b)(4) of the Act, copies of the following
information, statements or documents: The latest updated summary plan
description, and the latest annual report, any terminal report, the
bargaining agreement, trust agreement, contract, or other instruments
under which the plan is established or operated. Except where
explicitly permitted under the Act, no charge may be assessed for
furnishing information, statements or documents as required by other
provisions of the Act, which include, in part 1 of title I, sections
104(b)(1), (2), (3) and (c) and 105(a) and (c).
* * * * *
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of September, 2007.
Bradford P. Campbell,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration,
Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. E7-18073 Filed 9-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P