In the Matter of Terax Energy, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading, 52588-52589 [07-4584]
Download as PDF
52588
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Notices
Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20005, 202–326–
4024. (TTY/TDD users may call the
Federal relay service toll-free at 1–800–
877–8339 and ask to be connected to
202–326–4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Variable-Rate Premiums
Section 4006(a)(3)(E)(iii)(II) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA) and § 4006.4(b)(1)
of the PBGC’s regulation on Premium
Rates (29 CFR part 4006) prescribe use
of an assumed interest rate (the
‘‘required interest rate’’) in determining
a single-employer plan’s variable-rate
premium. Pursuant to the Pension
Protection Act of 2006, for premium
payment years beginning in 2006 or
2007, the required interest rate is the
‘‘applicable percentage’’ of the annual
rate of interest determined by the
Secretary of the Treasury on amounts
invested conservatively in long-term
investment grade corporate bonds for
the month preceding the beginning of
the plan year for which premiums are
being paid (the ‘‘premium payment
year’’).
On February 2, 2007 (at 72 FR 4955),
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
published final regulations containing
updated mortality tables for determining
current liability under section 412(l)(7)
of the Code and section 302(d)(7) of
ERISA for plan years beginning on or
after January 1, 2007. As a result, in
accordance with section
4006(a)(3)(E)(iii)(II) of ERISA, the
‘‘applicable percentage’’ to be used in
determining the required interest rate
for plan years beginning in 2007 is 100
percent.
The required interest rate to be used
in determining variable-rate premiums
for premium payment years beginning
in September 2007 is 6.33 percent (i.e.,
100 percent of the 6.33 percent
composite corporate bond rate for
August 2007 as determined by the
Treasury).
The following table lists the required
interest rates to be used in determining
variable-rate premiums for premium
payment years beginning between
October 2006 and September 2007.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
For premium payment years
beginning in
The required
interest rate is
October 2006 ........................
November 2006 ....................
December 2006 ....................
January 2007 ........................
February 2007 ......................
March 2007 ...........................
April 2007 .............................
May 2007 ..............................
June 2007 .............................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:44 Sep 13, 2007
5.06
5.05
4.90
5.75
5.89
5.85
5.84
5.98
6.01
Jkt 211001
The subject matter of the closed
meeting scheduled for Wednesday,
September 12, 2007 will be:
July 2007 ..............................
6.32
August 2007 .........................
6.33 Institution and settlement of injunctive
actions;
September 2007 ...................
6.33
Institution and settlement of
administrative proceedings of an
Multiemployer Plan Valuations
enforcement nature; and
Following Mass Withdrawal
Other matters related to enforcement
The PBGC’s regulation on Duties of
proceedings.
Plan Sponsor Following Mass
At times, changes in Commission
Withdrawal (29 CFR part 4281)
priorities require alterations in the
prescribes the use of interest
scheduling of meeting items. For further
assumptions under the PBGC’s
information and to ascertain what, if
regulation on Allocation of Assets in
any, matters have been added, deleted
Single-Employer Plans (29 CFR part
or postponed, please contact:
4044). The interest assumptions
The Office of the Secretary at (202)
applicable to valuation dates in October
551–5400.
2007 under part 4044 are contained in
an amendment to part 4044 published
September 11, 2007.
elsewhere in today’s Federal Register.
Florence E. Harmon,
Tables showing the assumptions
Deputy Secretary.
applicable to prior periods are codified
[FR Doc. E7–18214 Filed 9–13–07; 8:45 am]
in appendix B to 29 CFR part 4044.
For premium payment years
beginning in
The required
interest rate is
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Issued in Washington, DC, on this 11th day
of September 2007.
Vincent K. Snowbarger,
Deputy Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E7–18158 Filed 9–13–07; 8:45 pm]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 500–1]
BILLING CODE 7709–01–P
In the Matter of Terax Energy, Inc.;
Order of Suspension of Trading
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting; Federal
Register Citation of Previous
Announcement; 72 FR 51281,
September 6, 2007
Closed meeting.
100 F Street, NE., Washington,
STATUS:
PLACE:
DC.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF ADDITIONAL MEETING:
Additional meeting.
The Commission has scheduled a
closed meeting for Wednesday,
September 12, 2007 at 10:30 a.m.
Commissioners, Counsel to the
Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries
will attend the closed meeting. Certain
staff members who have an interest in
the matters may also be present.
The General Counsel of the
Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, exemption
5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (9)(ii) and
(10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7),
(9)(ii) and (10) permit consideration of
the scheduled matters at the Closed
Meeting.
Commissioner Casey, as duty officer,
voted to consider the items listed for the
closed meeting in closed session, and
determined that no earlier notice thereof
was possible.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
September 12, 2007.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Terax
Energy, Inc. (‘‘Terax,’’ trading symbol
TEXG.OB), because of questions
regarding the accuracy of assertions by
Terax and by others, in reports filed
with the Commission and in press
releases to investors concerning, among
other things: (1) The status of Terax’s oil
and gas operations, (2) Terax’s
purported financing agreements, (3)
Terax’s supposed acquisition of a
controlling interest in a foreign oil and
gas firm, (4) the existence, terms and
status of a purported share exchange
agreement between Terax and Westar
Oil, Inc., and (5) the identity of the
persons in control of the operations and
management of Terax.
The Commission is of the opinion that
the public interest and the protection of
investors require a suspension of trading
in the securities of the above-listed
company.
Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to
section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, that trading in the abovelisted company is suspended for the
period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, September
12, 2007 through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on
September 26, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 178 / Friday, September 14, 2007 / Notices
By the Commission.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07–4584 Filed 9–12–07; 12:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–56377; File No. SR–Amex–
2007–84]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
American Stock Exchange, LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment
No. 1 Thereto, Relating to Commentary
.02 to Amex Rule 950–ANTE(d)
September 10, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August 7,
2007, the American Stock Exchange,
LLC (‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II, below, which Items have
been prepared substantially by the
Exchange. On September 7, 2007, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposal.3 The Exchange filed the
proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A),4 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder,5 which renders the
proposal effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
The Exchange proposes to amend
Commentary .02 to Rule 950–ANTE(d)
to permit the member firm guarantee to
be set at either 20% or 40% and to
permit the guarantee to apply to certain
specified solicited orders.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Amex’s Web site at
https://www.amex.com, the Amex’s
Office of the Secretary, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange made
technical, non-substantive corrections to the filing.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
2 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:44 Sep 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Amex included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. The Amex has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule
change is to permit the Facilitation
Procedures Committee (‘‘Committee’’),
appointed by the Board, on a class-byclass basis, to apply the member firm
guarantee currently available for
facilitation crosses, to solicited orders
which improve the quoted market. The
Exchange proposes either a 20% or a
40% guarantee, to be determined by the
Committee. The current member firm
guarantee provides that a member firm
is entitled to a participation guarantee of
40% if the order is traded at a price that
matches or improves the market. The
Amex submits that the proposal is
similar to amendments adopted by the
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’).6
A solicited order is an order solicited
by a member firm (floor broker) to trade
with another order. The Amex submits
that orders which improve the quoted
market that are solicited in order to
facilitate a public customer order should
receive a similar guaranteed
participation as a member firm
facilitating its customer’s order if so
determined by the Facilitation
Procedures Committee.
Pursuant to Commentary .02(a)–(c) to
Rule 950–ANTE(d), a floor broker
holding an order for its public customer
and a facilitation order is permitted to
cross the orders if (i) floor broker
discloses on its order ticket for the
public customer order which is subject
to facilitation, all the terms of such
order, including, if applicable, any
contingency involving other options,
underlying securities, or related
securities; (ii) the floor broker requests
bids and offers for the option series
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53543
(March 23, 2006), 71 FR 15780 (March 29, 2006)
(SR–CBOE–2006–21).
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52589
subject to facilitation, then discloses the
public customer order and any
contingency respecting such order
which is subject to facilitation and
identifies the order as being subject to
facilitation; and (iii) after providing an
opportunity for such bids and offers to
be made, the floor broker on behalf of
the public customer whose order is
subject to facilitation, either bids at or
above the highest bid or at or below the
lowest offer in the market. After all
other market participants are given an
opportunity to accept the bid or offer
made on behalf of the public customer
whose order is subject to facilitation, the
floor broker may cross all or any
remaining part of such order and the
facilitation order at such customer’s bid
or offer by announcing in public outcry
that he is crossing such orders, stating
the quantity and price(s).
Notwithstanding the provisions
provided for in Commentary .02(a)–(c)
of 950–ANTE(d), in cases where a
member firm is seeking to facilitate its
own public customer’s order,
Commentary .02(d)(1) to Rule 950–
ANTE(d) currently provides that
member firms are entitled to participate
in the firm’s proprietary account as the
contra-side of that order to the extent of
40% of the remaining contracts, after
public customer orders on the
specialist’s book or customer orders
represented by a floor broker in the
crowd have been filled, provided the
order trades at a price that matches or
improves the market. This member firm
guarantee provides, under certain
conditions, the ability to cross 40% of
the customer order on behalf of a
member organization before the
specialist and/or registered options
traders in the crowd can participate in
the transaction. The provision generally
applies to orders of 400 contracts or
more. However, the Exchange is
currently permitted to establish smaller
eligible order sizes, on a class-by-class
basis, provided that size is not for fewer
than 50 contracts.
The proposed amendments to
Commentary .02(d) to Rule 950–ANTE
would allow the Committee to (i)
determine if solicited orders which
improve the quoted market may be
crossed in the same manner as
facilitation cross transactions, including
that the floor broker complies with the
disclosure and quote request process
described above and (ii) to establish
smaller eligible order sizes (i.e., less
than 400 contracts but not less than 50
contracts), a determination that is
currently made by the Exchange.
Current Commentary .02(d)(1) to Rule
950–ANTE(d) permits a member seeking
to facilitate its own public customer’s
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 178 (Friday, September 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52588-52589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4584]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 500-1]
In the Matter of Terax Energy, Inc.; Order of Suspension of
Trading
September 12, 2007.
It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Terax Energy, Inc. (``Terax,'' trading symbol TEXG.OB), because of
questions regarding the accuracy of assertions by Terax and by others,
in reports filed with the Commission and in press releases to investors
concerning, among other things: (1) The status of Terax's oil and gas
operations, (2) Terax's purported financing agreements, (3) Terax's
supposed acquisition of a controlling interest in a foreign oil and gas
firm, (4) the existence, terms and status of a purported share exchange
agreement between Terax and Westar Oil, Inc., and (5) the identity of
the persons in control of the operations and management of Terax.
The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed company.
Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed
company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, September 12,
2007 through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on September 26, 2007.
[[Page 52589]]
By the Commission.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-4584 Filed 9-12-07; 12:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P