Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Orange Juice from Brazil, 51798-51800 [E7-17873]
Download as PDF
51798
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
we will instruct CBP to liquidate
Nexteel’s entries of subject merchandise
during the POR without regard to
antidumping duties. See Nexteel’s
Preliminary Analysis Memo. The
Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
review.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Notice of Policy
Concerning Assessment of Antidumping
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003)
(Assessment Policy Notice). This
clarification will apply to entries of
subject merchandise during the period
of review produced by companies
included in these final results of
reviews for which the reviewed
companies did not know that the
merchandise it sold to the intermediary
(e.g., a reseller, trading company, or
exporter) was destined for the United
States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all–others rate if there is
no rate for the intermediary involved in
the transaction. See the Assessment
Policy Notice for a full discussion of this
clarification.
Public Comment
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b), the
Department will disclose to any party to
the proceeding the calculations
performed in connection with these
preliminary results within five days
after the date of publication of this
notice. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309,
interested parties may submit written
comments in response to these
preliminary results. Unless extended by
the Department, case briefs are to be
submitted within 30 days after the date
of publication of this notice. Rebuttal
briefs, limited to arguments raised in
case briefs, may be submitted no later
than five days after the time limit for
filing case briefs. Parties who submit
arguments in this proceeding are
requested to submit with the argument:
1) a statement of the issues; 2) a brief
summary of the argument; and 3) a table
of authorities. Case and rebuttal briefs
must be served on interested parties in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f).
Also, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
within 30 days of the date of publication
of this notice, interested parties may
request a public hearing on arguments
to be raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs. Unless the Secretary specifies
otherwise, the hearing, if requested, will
be held two days after the date for
submission of rebuttal briefs. Parties
will be notified of the time and location.
The Department will publish the final
results of this administrative review,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
including the results of its analysis of
issues raised in any case brief, rebuttal
brief, or hearing no later than 120 days
after publication of these preliminary
results, unless extended. See 19 CFR
351.213(h).
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–3874.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
These preliminary results of
administrative review and this notice
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(I)(1) of
the Act.
Background
On March 9, 2006, the Department
published in the Federal Register an
antidumping duty order on certain
orange juice from Brazil.
On May 21, 2007, Fischer
Agroindustria requested an expedited
changed circumstances review to
determine that Fischer Comercio is the
successor–in-interest to Fischer
Agroindustria and, therefore, that
Fischer Comercio is subject to the
antidumping duty order on certain
orange juice from Brazil.
On May 29, 2007, we requested
additional information from Fischer
Agroindustria regarding the factors the
Department examines when conducting
a changed circumstances review. On
June 27, 2007, Fischer Agroindustria
submitted this requested information,
indicating that assets of Fischer
Agroindustria were spun off and merged
with Fischer Comercio. On August 2,
2007, we requested additional
supporting documentation from Fischer
Agroindustria to substantiate its
assertions that the management,
suppliers, and customers of the
company had not changed as a result of
the merger. On August 9 and 13, 2007,
Fischer submitted this requested
information. According to Fischer
Agroindustria, it is necessary for the
Department to determine that Fischer
Comercio is the successor–in-interest to
Fischer Agroindustria so that Fischer
Comercio’s entries of subject
merchandise continue to receive Fischer
Agroindustria’s antidumping duty rate
from U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP).
Dated: August 31, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–17850 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–351–840]
Notice of Initiation and Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review: Certain
Orange Juice from Brazil
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: Fischer S/A—Agroindustria
(Fischer Agroindustria) has requested a
changed circumstances review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
orange juice from Brazil pursuant to
section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR
351.216(b). The Department of
Commerce (the Department) is initiating
this changed circumstances review and
issuing this notice of preliminary results
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii). We
have preliminarily determined that
Fischer S.A. Comercio, Industria and
Agricultura (Fischer Comercio) is the
successor–in-interest to Fischer
Agroindustria.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 11, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 2, Import
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Scope of the Order
The scope of this order includes
certain orange juice for transport and/or
further manufacturing, produced in two
different forms: (1) frozen orange juice
in a highly concentrated form,
sometimes referred to as FCOJM; and (2)
pasteurized single–strength orange juice
which has not been concentrated,
referred to as NFC. At the time of the
filing of the petition, there was an
existing antidumping duty order on
FCOJ from Brazil. See Antidumping
Duty Order; Frozen Concentrated
Orange Juice from Brazil, 52 FR 16426
(May 5, 1987). Therefore, the scope of
this order with regard to FCOJM covers
only FCOJM produced and/or exported
by those companies which were
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
excluded or revoked from the pre–
existing antidumping order on FCOJ
from Brazil as of December 27, 2004.
Those companies are Cargill Citrus
Limitada (Cargill), Coinbra–Frutesp S.A.
(Coinbra–Frutesp), Sucocitrico Cutrale,
S.A. (Cutrale), Fischer Agroindustria,
and Montecitrus Trading S.A.
(Montecitrus).
Excluded from the scope of the order
are reconstituted orange juice and
frozen concentrated orange juice for
retail (FCOJR). Reconstituted orange
juice is produced through further
manufacture of FCOJM, by adding
water, oils and essences to the orange
juice concentrate. FCOJR is
concentrated orange juice, typically at
42[deg] Brix, in a frozen state, packed in
retail–sized containers ready for sale to
consumers. FCOJR, a finished consumer
product, is produced through further
manufacture of FCOJM, a bulk
manufacturer’s product. The subject
merchandise is currently classifiable
under subheadings 2009.11.00,
2009.12.25, 2009.12.45, and 2009.19.00
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS). These
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and for customs purposes
only and are not dispositive. Rather, the
written description of the scope of this
order is dispositive.
Initiation and Preliminary Results
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the
Act, the Department will conduct a
changed circumstances review upon
receipt of information concerning, or a
request from an interested party for a
review of, an antidumping duty order
which shows changed circumstances
sufficient to warrant a review of the
order. As indicated in the ‘‘Background’’
section, we have received information
indicating that assets of Fischer
Agroindustria were spun off and merged
with Fischer Comercio. This constitutes
changed circumstances warranting a
review of the order. Therefore, in
accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the
Act, we are initiating a changed
circumstances review based upon the
information contained in Fischer
Agroindustria’s submissions.
Section 351.221(c)(3)(ii) of the
Department’s regulations permits the
Department to combine the notice of
initiation of a changed circumstances
review and the notice of preliminary
results if the Department concludes that
expedited action is warranted. In this
instance, because we have on the record
the information necessary to make a
preliminary finding, we find that
expedited action is warranted and have
combined the notice of initiation and
the notice of preliminary results.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
In making a successor–in-interest
determination, the Department
examines several factors including, but
not limited to, changes in: (1)
management; (2) production facilities;
(3) supplier relationships; and (4)
customer base. See, e.g., Notice of Final
Results of Changed Circumstances
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Polychloroprene Rubber From
Japan, 67 FR 58 (Jan. 2, 2002); Brass
Sheet and Strip from Canada: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 57 FR 20460,
20462 (May 13, 1992). While no single
factor or combination of these factors
will necessarily provide a dispositive
indication of a successor–in-interest
relationship, the Department will
generally consider the new company to
be the successor to the previous
company if the new company’s resulting
operation is not materially dissimilar to
that of its predecessor. See, e.g., Fresh
and Chilled Atlantic Salmon from
Norway; Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 64 FR 9979
(Mar. 1, 1999); Industrial Phosphoric
Acid from Israel; Final Results of
Changed Circumstances Review, 59 FR
6944 (Feb. 14, 1994). Thus, if the
evidence demonstrates that, with
respect to the production and sale of the
subject merchandise, the new company
operates as the same business entity as
the former company, the Department
will accord the new company the same
antidumping treatment as its
predecessor.
In its May 21, 2007, submission,
Fischer Agroindustria states that the
operational functions of Fischer
Agroindustria were collapsed into
Fischer Comercio. According to Fischer
Agroindustria’s June 27, 2007,
submission, the company’s
management, production facilities and
customer/supplier relationships have
not changed as a result of the merger. To
support its claims, Fischer
Agroindustria submitted the following
documents: (1) organizational charts
from before and after the date of the
merger; (2) minutes from the special
meeting of shareholders for Fischer
Agroindustria held December 31, 2006;
(3) minutes from the special meeting of
shareholders for Fischer Comercio held
December 31, 2006; (4) the ‘‘Protocol for
Justification of Spin–Off Followed by
Merger’’ (the Protocol); (5) the list of
shareholders of Fischer Comercio before
and after the merger, as filed with the
Register of Commerce in Brazil; (6)
approval from the Register of Commerce
of the minutes of the December 31,
2006, special meetings of Fischer
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51799
Agroindustria and Fischer Comercio
and of the Protocol; (7) a list of the
managers of Fischer Agroindustria
before the merger and Fischer Comercio
after the merger; (8) a list of the
suppliers of Fischer Agroindustria
before the merger and Fischer Comercio
after the merger; and (9) a list of the
customers of Fischer Agroindustria
before the merger and Fischer Comercio
after the merger.
Based on the information submitted
by Fischer Agroindustria, we
preliminarily find that Fischer Comercio
is the successor–in-interest to Fischer
Agroindustria. Based on the evidence
reviewed, we find that Fischer Comercio
operates as the same business entity as
Fischer Agroindustria and that the
production facilities, supplier
relationships, and customers have not
changed as a result of the merger.
Further, the companies’ senior
management is largely the same. Thus,
we preliminarily find that Fischer
Comercio should receive the same
antidumping duty cash–deposit rate
(i.e., 12.46 percent) with respect to the
subject merchandise as Fischer
Agroindustria, its predecessor company.
However, because cash deposits are
only estimates of the amount of
antidumping duties that will be due,
changes in cash deposit rates are not
made retroactive. If Fischer Comercio
believes that the deposits paid exceed
the actual amount of dumping, it is
entitled to request an administrative
review during the anniversary month of
the publication of the order of those
entries to determine the proper
assessment rate and receive a refund of
any excess deposits. See Certain Hot–
Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel
Products From the United Kingdom:
Final Results of Changed–
Circumstances Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, 64 FR 66880 (Nov. 30, 1999).
As a result, if these preliminary results
are adopted in our final results of this
changed circumstances review, we will
instruct CBP to suspend shipments of
subject merchandise made by Fischer
Comercio at Fischer Agroindustria’s
cash deposit rate (i.e., 12.46 percent).
Public Comment
Any interested party may request a
hearing within 30 days of publication of
this notice. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). A
hearing, if requested, will be held 44
days after the date of publication of this
notice, or the first working day
thereafter. Interested parties may submit
case briefs and/or written comments not
later than 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Rebuttal
briefs and rebuttals to written
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
51800
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
comments, which must be limited to
issues raised in such briefs or
comments, may be filed not later than
37 days after the date of publication of
this notice. Parties who submit
arguments are requested to submit with
the argument: (1) a statement of the
issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.
Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e),
we will issue the final results of this
changed circumstances review no later
than 270 days after the date on which
this review was initiated, or within 45
days if all parties agree to our
preliminary finding. We are issuing and
publishing this finding and notice in
accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216.
Dated: September 5, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–17873 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–878]
Saccharin from the People’s Republic
of China: Final Results of the 2005–
2006 Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 4, 2007, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) published Saccharin
from the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the 2005 2006
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 72 FR 25247 (May 4, 2007)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). The period of
review (‘‘POR’’) is July 1, 2005, through
June 30, 2006. The administrative
review covers one respondent, Shanghai
Fortune Chemical Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai
Fortune’’).
We invited interested parties to
comment on our Preliminary Results.
Based on our analysis of the comments
received, we made certain changes to
our calculations. The final dumping
margin for the administrative review is
listed in the ‘‘Final Results of the
Review’’ section, below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 11, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frances Veith or Blanche Ziv, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th St. and Constitution
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4295 or (202) 482–
4207, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 4, 2007, the Department
published the Preliminary Results of the
2005–2006 administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on saccharin
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’). Since the publication of the
Preliminary Results, the following
events have occurred.
On May 24, 2007, the Department
received a submission on surrogate
value data from Shanghai Fortune.1 In
the Preliminary Results, we stated that
any interested party may request a
hearing and may submit briefs or
written comments within 30 days of
publication of the Preliminary Results
notice in the Federal Register, and may
submit rebuttal briefs, limited to the
issues raised in the case briefs, five days
subsequent to the due date of the case
briefs. See Preliminary Results, 72 FR at
25252. On June 4, 2007, the Department
received a case brief from Shanghai
Fortune.2 However, we did not receive
any hearing requests or rebuttal briefs
on the Preliminary Results.
We conducted this review in
accordance with sections 751 and
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19 CFR
351.213 and 351.221.
Period of Review
The POR is July 1, 2005, through June
30, 2006.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this
antidumping duty order is saccharin.
Saccharin is defined as a non–nutritive
sweetener used in beverages and foods,
personal care products such as
toothpaste, table top sweeteners, and
animal feeds. It is also used in
metalworking fluids. There are four
primary chemical compositions of
saccharin: (1) Sodium saccharin
(American Chemical Society Chemical
Abstract Service (‘‘CAS’’) Registry 128–
44–44); (2) calcium saccharin (CAS
Registry 6485–34–34); (3) acid (or
insoluble) saccharin (CAS Registry 81–
07–07); and (4) research grade
saccharin. Most of the U.S.-produced
and imported grades of saccharin from
1 See Letter from Shanghai Fortune regarding,
‘‘Saccharin from the People’s Republic of China:
Submission of Publicly Available Data For Use As
Surrogate Values,’’ dated May 24, 2007.
2 See Letter from Shanghai Fortune regarding,
‘‘Saccharin from the People’s Republic of China:
Case Brief of Shanghai Fortune Chemical Company,
Ltd.,’’ dated June 4, 2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the PRC are sodium and calcium
saccharin, which are available in
granular, powder, spray–dried powder,
and liquid forms. The merchandise
subject to this order is currently
classifiable under subheading
2925.11.00 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) and includes all types of
saccharin imported under this HTSUS
subheading, including research and
specialized grades. Although the
HTSUS subheading is provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
Department’s written description of the
scope of this order remains dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case brief filed
by Shanghai Fortune in this review are
addressed in the Memorandum from
Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, to
David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary
for Import Administration, ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the 2005–
2006 Administrative Review of
Saccharin From the People’s Republic of
China,’’ dated concurrently with this
notice (‘‘Issues and Decision Memo’’),
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
A list of the issues raised by Shanghai
Fortune and to which we have
responded in the Issues and Decision
Memo follows as an appendix to this
notice. The Issues and Decision Memo
is a public document which is on file in
the Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’) in
room B–099 of the main Department
building, and is also accessible on the
Web at . The
paper copy and electronic version of the
Issues and Decision Memo are identical
in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of comments
received from Shanghai Fortune and
information on the record of this review,
we made changes to the margin
calculations as noted below.
For the final results, we have made
changes to the surrogate values for
aqueous ammonia and steam coal. For
further details, see the Issue and
Decision Memo at Comments 1 and 3,
the Shanghai Fortune Analysis Memo3
and the Final Surrogate Value Memo.4
3 See Memorandum to the file through Blanche
Ziv, Program Manager, NME Group/Office 8, Import
Administration, from Ann Fornaro, International
Trade Analyst, NME Group/Office 8, Import
Administration, regarding, ‘‘Analysis for the Final
Results of the 2005–2006 Administrative Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order on Saccharin from the
People’s Republic of China: Shanghai Fortune
Chemical Co., Ltd.,’’ dated concurrently with this
notice (‘‘Shanghai Fortune Analysis Memo’’).
4 See Memorandum to the file through Blanche
Ziv, Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations, Office
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51798-51800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-17873]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-351-840]
Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Orange Juice from Brazil
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: Fischer S/A--Agroindustria (Fischer Agroindustria) has
requested a changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty order
on certain orange juice from Brazil pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.216(b). The
Department of Commerce (the Department) is initiating this changed
circumstances review and issuing this notice of preliminary results
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii). We have preliminarily determined
that Fischer S.A. Comercio, Industria and Agricultura (Fischer
Comercio) is the successor-in-interest to Fischer Agroindustria.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 11, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3874.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 9, 2006, the Department published in the Federal Register
an antidumping duty order on certain orange juice from Brazil.
On May 21, 2007, Fischer Agroindustria requested an expedited
changed circumstances review to determine that Fischer Comercio is the
successor-in-interest to Fischer Agroindustria and, therefore, that
Fischer Comercio is subject to the antidumping duty order on certain
orange juice from Brazil.
On May 29, 2007, we requested additional information from Fischer
Agroindustria regarding the factors the Department examines when
conducting a changed circumstances review. On June 27, 2007, Fischer
Agroindustria submitted this requested information, indicating that
assets of Fischer Agroindustria were spun off and merged with Fischer
Comercio. On August 2, 2007, we requested additional supporting
documentation from Fischer Agroindustria to substantiate its assertions
that the management, suppliers, and customers of the company had not
changed as a result of the merger. On August 9 and 13, 2007, Fischer
submitted this requested information. According to Fischer
Agroindustria, it is necessary for the Department to determine that
Fischer Comercio is the successor-in-interest to Fischer Agroindustria
so that Fischer Comercio's entries of subject merchandise continue to
receive Fischer Agroindustria's antidumping duty rate from U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP).
Scope of the Order
The scope of this order includes certain orange juice for transport
and/or further manufacturing, produced in two different forms: (1)
frozen orange juice in a highly concentrated form, sometimes referred
to as FCOJM; and (2) pasteurized single-strength orange juice which has
not been concentrated, referred to as NFC. At the time of the filing of
the petition, there was an existing antidumping duty order on FCOJ from
Brazil. See Antidumping Duty Order; Frozen Concentrated Orange Juice
from Brazil, 52 FR 16426 (May 5, 1987). Therefore, the scope of this
order with regard to FCOJM covers only FCOJM produced and/or exported
by those companies which were
[[Page 51799]]
excluded or revoked from the pre-existing antidumping order on FCOJ
from Brazil as of December 27, 2004. Those companies are Cargill Citrus
Limitada (Cargill), Coinbra-Frutesp S.A. (Coinbra-Frutesp), Sucocitrico
Cutrale, S.A. (Cutrale), Fischer Agroindustria, and Montecitrus Trading
S.A. (Montecitrus).
Excluded from the scope of the order are reconstituted orange juice
and frozen concentrated orange juice for retail (FCOJR). Reconstituted
orange juice is produced through further manufacture of FCOJM, by
adding water, oils and essences to the orange juice concentrate. FCOJR
is concentrated orange juice, typically at 42[lsqb]deg[rsqb] Brix, in a
frozen state, packed in retail-sized containers ready for sale to
consumers. FCOJR, a finished consumer product, is produced through
further manufacture of FCOJM, a bulk manufacturer's product. The
subject merchandise is currently classifiable under subheadings
2009.11.00, 2009.12.25, 2009.12.45, and 2009.19.00 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). These HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and for customs purposes only and are not
dispositive. Rather, the written description of the scope of this order
is dispositive.
Initiation and Preliminary Results
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Act, the Department will
conduct a changed circumstances review upon receipt of information
concerning, or a request from an interested party for a review of, an
antidumping duty order which shows changed circumstances sufficient to
warrant a review of the order. As indicated in the ``Background''
section, we have received information indicating that assets of Fischer
Agroindustria were spun off and merged with Fischer Comercio. This
constitutes changed circumstances warranting a review of the order.
Therefore, in accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the Act, we are
initiating a changed circumstances review based upon the information
contained in Fischer Agroindustria's submissions.
Section 351.221(c)(3)(ii) of the Department's regulations permits
the Department to combine the notice of initiation of a changed
circumstances review and the notice of preliminary results if the
Department concludes that expedited action is warranted. In this
instance, because we have on the record the information necessary to
make a preliminary finding, we find that expedited action is warranted
and have combined the notice of initiation and the notice of
preliminary results.
In making a successor-in-interest determination, the Department
examines several factors including, but not limited to, changes in: (1)
management; (2) production facilities; (3) supplier relationships; and
(4) customer base. See, e.g., Notice of Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polychloroprene
Rubber From Japan, 67 FR 58 (Jan. 2, 2002); Brass Sheet and Strip from
Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 57 FR
20460, 20462 (May 13, 1992). While no single factor or combination of
these factors will necessarily provide a dispositive indication of a
successor-in-interest relationship, the Department will generally
consider the new company to be the successor to the previous company if
the new company's resulting operation is not materially dissimilar to
that of its predecessor. See, e.g., Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon
from Norway; Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 64 FR 9979 (Mar. 1, 1999); Industrial Phosphoric
Acid from Israel; Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 59 FR
6944 (Feb. 14, 1994). Thus, if the evidence demonstrates that, with
respect to the production and sale of the subject merchandise, the new
company operates as the same business entity as the former company, the
Department will accord the new company the same antidumping treatment
as its predecessor.
In its May 21, 2007, submission, Fischer Agroindustria states that
the operational functions of Fischer Agroindustria were collapsed into
Fischer Comercio. According to Fischer Agroindustria's June 27, 2007,
submission, the company's management, production facilities and
customer/supplier relationships have not changed as a result of the
merger. To support its claims, Fischer Agroindustria submitted the
following documents: (1) organizational charts from before and after
the date of the merger; (2) minutes from the special meeting of
shareholders for Fischer Agroindustria held December 31, 2006; (3)
minutes from the special meeting of shareholders for Fischer Comercio
held December 31, 2006; (4) the ``Protocol for Justification of Spin-
Off Followed by Merger'' (the Protocol); (5) the list of shareholders
of Fischer Comercio before and after the merger, as filed with the
Register of Commerce in Brazil; (6) approval from the Register of
Commerce of the minutes of the December 31, 2006, special meetings of
Fischer Agroindustria and Fischer Comercio and of the Protocol; (7) a
list of the managers of Fischer Agroindustria before the merger and
Fischer Comercio after the merger; (8) a list of the suppliers of
Fischer Agroindustria before the merger and Fischer Comercio after the
merger; and (9) a list of the customers of Fischer Agroindustria before
the merger and Fischer Comercio after the merger.
Based on the information submitted by Fischer Agroindustria, we
preliminarily find that Fischer Comercio is the successor-in-interest
to Fischer Agroindustria. Based on the evidence reviewed, we find that
Fischer Comercio operates as the same business entity as Fischer
Agroindustria and that the production facilities, supplier
relationships, and customers have not changed as a result of the
merger. Further, the companies' senior management is largely the same.
Thus, we preliminarily find that Fischer Comercio should receive the
same antidumping duty cash-deposit rate (i.e., 12.46 percent) with
respect to the subject merchandise as Fischer Agroindustria, its
predecessor company.
However, because cash deposits are only estimates of the amount of
antidumping duties that will be due, changes in cash deposit rates are
not made retroactive. If Fischer Comercio believes that the deposits
paid exceed the actual amount of dumping, it is entitled to request an
administrative review during the anniversary month of the publication
of the order of those entries to determine the proper assessment rate
and receive a refund of any excess deposits. See Certain Hot-Rolled
Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products From the United Kingdom: Final
Results of Changed-Circumstances Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 64 FR 66880 (Nov. 30, 1999). As a result, if
these preliminary results are adopted in our final results of this
changed circumstances review, we will instruct CBP to suspend shipments
of subject merchandise made by Fischer Comercio at Fischer
Agroindustria's cash deposit rate (i.e., 12.46 percent).
Public Comment
Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of
publication of this notice. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). A hearing, if
requested, will be held 44 days after the date of publication of this
notice, or the first working day thereafter. Interested parties may
submit case briefs and/or written comments not later than 30 days after
the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs and rebuttals
to written
[[Page 51800]]
comments, which must be limited to issues raised in such briefs or
comments, may be filed not later than 37 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Parties who submit arguments are requested
to submit with the argument: (1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.
Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), we will issue the final results
of this changed circumstances review no later than 270 days after the
date on which this review was initiated, or within 45 days if all
parties agree to our preliminary finding. We are issuing and publishing
this finding and notice in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216.
Dated: September 5, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-17873 Filed 9-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S