Financial Investors Variable Insurance Trust et al., Notice of Application September 4, 2007, 51869-51874 [E7-17786]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
Facility Operating License Nos. DPR
70 and DPR–75: The amendments
revised the TSs and the License.
Date of initial notice in Federal
Register: November 7, 2006 (71 FR
65143).
The supplement dated May 14, 2007,
provided additional information that
clarified the application, did not expand
the scope of the application as originally
noticed, and did not change the NRC
staff’s original proposed no significant
hazards consideration determination as
published in the Federal Register on
November 7, 2006 (71 FR 65143).
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendments is contained in a
Safety Evaluation dated August 23,
2007.
No significant hazards consideration
comments received: No.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
PSEG Nuclear LLC, Docket No. 50–354,
Hope Creek Generating Station, Salem
County, New Jersey
Date of application for amendment:
November 15, 2006, as supplemented by
letters dated June 21, and August 23,
2007.
Brief description of amendment: The
amendment deletes Technical
Specification (TS) Table 3.6.3–1,
‘‘Primary Containment Isolation
Valves,’’ and relocates the information
to the Hope Creek Generating Station
Technical Requirements Manual (TRM).
The amendment also revises other TS
sections that reference TS Table 3.6.3–
1.
Date of issuance: August 27, 2007.
Effective date: As of the date of
issuance, to be implemented within 90
days. Implementation shall include the
relocation of information from the TSs
to the TRM as described in the
licensee’s application dated November
15, 2006, and letters dated June 21, and
August 23, 2007.
Amendment No.: 171.
Facility Operating License No. NPF–
57: The amendment revised the TSs and
the License.
Date of initial notice in Federal
Register: February 13, 2007 (72 FR
6789).
The supplements dated June 21, and
August 23, 2007, provided clarifying
information that did not change the
initial proposed no significant hazards
consideration determination or expand
the application beyond the scope of the
original Federal Register notice.
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendment is contained in a
Safety Evaluation dated August 27,
2007.
No significant hazards consideration
comments received: No.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day
of September, 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Catherine Haney,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E7–17864 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. IC–27965; File No. 812–13359]
Financial Investors Variable Insurance
Trust et al., Notice of Application
September 4, 2007
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or the
‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of application
(‘‘Application’’) for exemption, pursuant
to section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended (the
‘‘1940 Act’’), from the provisions of
sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of
the Act and Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15) thereunder.
AGENCY:
Applicants: Ibbotson Conservative
ETF Asset Allocation Portfolio, Ibbotson
Income and Growth ETF Asset
Allocation Portfolio, Ibbotson Balanced
ETF Asset Allocation Portfolio, Ibbotson
Growth ETF Asset Allocation Portfolio,
Ibbotson Aggressive Growth ETF Asset
Allocation Portfolio (collectively, the
‘‘Existing Funds’’), each a series of
Financial Investors Variable Insurance
Trust (the ‘‘Trust’’), any other series
established from time to time under the
Trust (collectively with the Existing
Funds, the ‘‘Insurance Funds’’), and any
future investment company that is
designed to fund insurance products
and for which ALPS Advisers, Inc. (the
‘‘Investment Adviser’’), any successor in
interest (collectively with the
Investment Adviser, the ‘‘Investment
Advisers’’), or any affiliates of the
Investment Advisers may serve as
investment manager, investment
adviser, subadviser, administrator,
principal underwriter or sponsor (funds
advised by such Investment Advisers
herein also referred to collectively as the
‘‘Insurance Funds’’) (the Trust, the
Existing Funds, the Insurance Funds,
the Investment Adviser, and the
Investment Advisers, referred to
collectively as the ‘‘Applicants’’).
Summary of Application: The
Applicants request an order exempting
certain life insurance companies on
behalf of their separate accounts that
currently invest or may hereafter invest
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51869
in the Insurance Funds to the extent
necessary to permit shares of the
Existing Funds (the ‘‘Shares’’) and the
Insurance Funds to be sold to and held
by: (i) Separate accounts funding
variable annuity contracts and variable
life insurance policies (collectively
‘‘Variable Contracts’’) issued by both
affiliated life insurance companies and
unaffiliated life insurance companies;
(ii) trustees of qualified group pension
and group retirement plans outside of
the separate account context (‘‘Qualified
Plans’’); (iii) separate accounts that are
not registered as investment companies
under the 1940 Act pursuant to
exemptions from registration under
section 3(c) of the 1940 Act; (iv) any
Adviser to an Insurance Fund that is
permitted to hold shares in an Insurance
Fund consistent with the requirements
of regulations issued by the Treasury
Department (individually a ‘‘Treasury
Regulation’’ and collectively the
‘‘Treasury Regulations’’), specifically
Treasury Regulation Section 1.817–5 for
the purpose of providing seed capital to
an Insurance Fund; and (v) any other
Participating Insurance Company
permitted to hold shares of an Insurance
Fund (‘‘General Accounts’’).
Filing Date: The Application was filed
on January 26, 2007, and amended and
restated on May 21, 2007.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by writing to the Secretary of
the Commission and serving Applicants
with a copy of the request, personally or
by mail. Hearing requests should be
received by the Commission by 5:30
p.m. on September 26, 2007, and should
be accompanied by proof of service on
Applicants in the form of an affidavit or,
for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Hearing requests should state the nature
of the requester’s interest, the reason for
the request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
writing to the Secretary of the
Commission.
ADDRESSES: The Commission: Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090; Applicants: c/o Jeffrey T.
Pike, Esq., Secretary, Financial Investors
Variable Insurance Trust, 1290
Broadway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado
80203.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey A. Foor, Senior Counsel, or
Zandra Y. Bailes, Branch Chief, Office of
Insurance Products, Division of
Investment Management, at (202) 551–
6795.
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
51870
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
The
following is a summary of the
Application. The complete Application
is available for a fee from the SEC’s
Public Reference Branch, 100 F Street,
NE., Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549
(telephone (202) 551–8090).
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Applicants’ Representations
1. Each Insurance Fund is, or will be,
registered under the 1940 Act as an
open-end management investment
company. The Trust (File No. 811–
21987) is registered under the 1940 Act
as a non-diversified management
investment company. Applicants state
that the Trust’s shares are registered
under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the ‘‘1933 Act’’) (File No.
333–139186) and the investment adviser
to the Trust, ALPS Advisers, Inc. is
registered with the Commission as an
investment adviser under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as
amended.
2. Applicants state that the Existing
Funds intend to, and other Insurance
Funds may in the future, offer Shares to
separate accounts of affiliated and
unaffiliated insurance companies
funding variable annuity or variable life
products. Applicants state that these
separate accounts are, or will be,
registered as investment companies
under the 1940 Act or will be exempt
from such registration (individually a
‘‘Separate Account’’ and collectively the
‘‘Separate Accounts’’). Insurance
companies whose Separate Account(s)
may now or in the future own Shares
are referred to herein as ‘‘Participating
Insurance Companies.’’
3. Applicants propose that the Funds
be permitted to offer and/or sell shares
to Separate Accounts funding Variable
Contracts issued by Participating
Insurance Companies. Applicants
represent that the Participating
Insurance Companies at the time of their
investment in the Insurance Funds
either have established or will establish
their own Separate Accounts and design
their own Variable Contracts. Each
Participating Insurance Company has or
will have the legal obligation of
satisfying all applicable requirements
under both state and federal law.
Applicants represent that each
Participating Insurance Company on
behalf of its Separate Accounts has
entered or will enter into an agreement
with each Insurance Fund in which it
invests concerning participation by the
Participating Insurance Company in
such Insurance Fund (a ‘‘Participation
Agreement’’). The role of the Insurance
Funds under this agreement, insofar as
the federal securities laws are
applicable, will consist of, among other
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
things, offering shares to the Separate
Accounts and complying with any
conditions that the Commission may
impose.
4. Applicants propose that the
Insurance Funds also be permitted to
offer and/or sell Shares to Qualified
Plans administered by a Trustee.
Section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the ‘‘Code’’),
imposes certain diversification
standards on the underlying assets of
Separate Accounts funding Variable
Contracts. The Code provides that
Variable Contracts shall not be treated
as an annuity contract or life insurance
policy for any period (or any subsequent
period) for which the underlying assets
are not, in accordance with regulations
prescribed by the Treasury Department,
(individually, a ‘‘Treasury Regulation’’
and collectively the ‘‘Treasury
Regulations’’), adequately diversified.
On March 2, 1989, the Treasury
Department issued Treasury Regulations
(Treas. Reg. Section 1.817–5) that
established diversification requirements
for Variable Contracts, which require
the Separate Accounts upon which
these contracts or policies are based to
be diversified as provided in the
Treasury Regulations. In the case of
Separate Accounts that invest in
underlying investment companies, the
Treasury Regulations provide a ‘‘look
through’’ rule that permits the Separate
Account to look to the underlying
investment company for purposes of
meeting the diversification
requirements, provided that the
beneficial interests in the investment
company are held only by the
segregated asset accounts of one or more
insurance companies. However, the
Treasury Regulations also contain
certain exceptions to this requirement,
one of which allows shares in an
investment company to be held by the
trustee of a qualified pension or
retirement plan without adversely
affecting the tax status of Variable
Contracts (Treas. Reg. Section 1.817–
5(f)(3)(iii)). Another exception allows
the investment manager of the
investment company and certain
companies related to the investment
manager to hold shares of the
investment company, an exception that
is often used to provide the capital
required by section 14(a) of the 1940
Act.
5. Applicants also propose that the
Funds be permitted to offer and/or sell
shares to an Adviser for the purpose of
providing initial capital to an Insurance
Fund and to General Accounts. The
Regulations permit such sales to an
Adviser and to General Accounts so
long as the return on shares held by
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
each is computed in the same manner
as for shares held by the Separate
Accounts, and the Adviser and the
General Accounts do not intend to sell
shares of the Portfolio held by it to the
public. The Treasury Regulations
impose an additional restriction on sales
to investment advisers, who may hold
shares only in connection with the
creation of an Insurance Fund.
Applicants anticipate that sales in
reliance on these provisions of the
Treasury Regulations will be made to an
Adviser for the purpose of providing the
initial capital for a Fund and that any
Shares purchased by an Adviser will be
redeemed immediately if and when the
Adviser’s investment advisory
agreement terminates.
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. In connection with the funding of
scheduled premium variable life
insurance contracts issued through a
Separate Account registered as a unit
investment trust (‘‘UIT’’) under the 1940
Act, Rule 6e–2(b)(15) provides partial
exemptions from sections 9(a), 13(a),
15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act. Section
9(a)(2) of the 1940 Act makes it
unlawful for any company to serve as an
investment adviser or principal
underwriter of any UIT, if an affiliated
person of that company is subject to a
disqualification enumerated in section
9(a)(1) or (2) of the 1940 Act. Sections
13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act
have been deemed by the Commission
to require ‘‘pass-through’’ voting with
respect to an underlying investment
company’s shares. Rule 6e–2(b)(15)
provides these exemptions apply only
where all of the assets of the UIT are
shares of management investment
companies ‘‘which offer their shares
exclusively to variable life insurance
separate accounts of the life insurer or
of any affiliated life insurance
company.’’ Therefore, the relief granted
by Rule 6e–2(b)(15) is not available with
respect to a scheduled premium life
insurance Separate Account that owns
shares of an underlying fund that also
offers its shares to a variable annuity
Separate Account or flexible premium
variable life insurance Separate Account
of the same company or any other
affiliated insurance company. The use
of a common management investment
company as the underlying investment
vehicle for both variable annuity and
variable life insurance separate accounts
of the same life insurance company or
of any affiliated life insurance company
is referred to herein as ‘‘mixed
funding.’’
2. The relief granted by Rule 6e–
2(b)(15) also is not available with
respect to a scheduled premium variable
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
life insurance Separate Account that
owns shares of an underlying fund that
also offers its shares to Separate
Accounts funding Variable Contracts of
one or more unaffiliated life insurance
companies. The use of a common
management investment company as the
underlying investment vehicle for
variable annuity and/or variable life
insurance Separate Accounts of
unaffiliated life insurance companies is
referred to herein as ‘‘shared funding.’’
3. Moreover, because the relief under
Rule 6e–2(b)(15) is available only where
shares are offered exclusively to variable
life insurance Separate Accounts of a
life insurer or any affiliated life
insurance company, additional
exemptive relief is necessary if the
Shares are also to be sold to Qualified
Plans, an Adviser and General Accounts
(collectively, ‘‘Eligible Purchasers’’).
Applicants note that if the Shares were
sold only to Separate Accounts funding
variable annuity contracts and/or
Eligible Purchasers, exemptive relief
under Rule 6e–2(b)(15) would not be
necessary. The relief provided for under
this section does not relate to Eligible
Purchasers or to a registered investment
company’s ability to sell its shares to
Eligible Purchasers. The use of a
common management investment
company as the underlying investment
vehicle for Separate Accounts funding
Variable Contracts issued by affiliated
and unaffiliated insurance companies,
and for Eligible Purchasers, is referred
to herein as ‘‘extended mixed and
shared funding.’’
4. In connection with flexible
premium variable life insurance
contracts issued through a separate
account registered under the 1940 Act
as a UIT, Rule 6e–3(T)(b)(15) provides
partial exemptions from sections 9(a),
13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act.
The exemptions granted by Rule 6e–
3(T)(b)(15) are available only where all
the assets of the Separate Account
consist of the shares of one or more
registered management investment
companies that offer to sell their shares
‘‘exclusively to separate accounts of the
life insurer, or of any affiliated life
insurance companies, offering either
scheduled contracts or flexible
contracts, or both; or which also offer
their shares to variable annuity separate
accounts of the life insurer or of an
affiliated life insurance company or
which offer their shares to any such life
insurance company in consideration
solely for advances made by the life
insurer in connection with the operation
of the separate account.’’ Therefore,
Rule 6e–3(T)(b)(15) permits mixed
funding but does not permit shared
funding.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
5. Moreover, because the relief under
Rule 6e–3(T) is available only where
shares are offered exclusively to variable
life insurance separate accounts of a life
insurer or any affiliated life insurance
company, additional exemptive relief is
necessary if the shares of the Portfolios
are also to be sold to Eligible
Purchasers, as described above.
Applicants note that if the Shares were
sold only to Separate Accounts funding
variable annuity contracts and/or
Eligible Purchasers, exemptive relief
under Rule 6e–3(T)(b)(15) would not be
necessary. The relief provided for under
this section does not relate to Eligible
Purchasers or to a registered investment
company’s ability to sell its shares to
Eligible Purchasers.
6. Applicants maintain, as discussed
below, that there is no policy reason for
the sale of the Portfolios’ shares to
Eligible Purchasers to result in a
prohibition against, or otherwise limit a
Participating Insurance Company from
relying on the relief provided by Rules
6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15).
However, because the relief under Rules
6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) is
available only when shares are offered
exclusively to Separate Accounts,
additional exemptive relief may be
necessary if the shares of the Portfolios
are also to be sold to Eligible
Purchasers. Applicants therefore request
relief in order to have the Participating
Insurance Companies enjoy the benefits
of the relief granted in Rules 6e–2(b)(15)
and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) even where Eligible
Purchasers are investing in the relevant
Insurance Fund. Applicants note that if
the Shares were to be sold only to
Eligible Purchasers, and/or Separate
Accounts funding variable annuity
contracts, exemptive relief under Rule
6e–2(b)(15) and Rule 6e–3(T)(b)(15)
would be unnecessary. The relief
provided for under Rules 6e–2(b)(15)
and 6e–3(T)(b)(15) does not relate to
Eligible Purchasers, or to a registered
investment company’s ability to sell its
shares to Eligible Purchasers.
7. Consistent with the Commission’s
authority under section 6(c) of the 1940
Act to grant exemptive orders to a class
or classes of persons and transactions,
the Application requests relief for the
class consisting of Participating
Insurance Companies and their Separate
Accounts (and to the extent necessary,
investment advisers, principal
underwriters and depositors of such
Separate Accounts).
8. In effect, the partial relief granted
in Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15)
under the 1940 Act from the
requirements of section 9 of the 1940
Act limits the amount of monitoring
necessary to ensure compliance with
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51871
section 9 to that which is appropriate in
light of the policy and purposes of
section 9. Those rules recognize that it
is not necessary for the protection of
investors or the purposes fairly intended
by the policy and provisions of the 1940
Act to apply the provisions of section
9(a) to individuals in a large insurance
complex, most of whom will have no
involvement in matters pertaining to
investment companies in that
organization. Applicants assert that it is
also unnecessary to apply section 9(a) of
the 1940 Act to the many individuals in
various unaffiliated insurance
companies (or affiliated companies of
Participating Insurance Companies) that
may utilize the Insurance Funds as
investment vehicles for Variable
Contracts. Applicants argue that there is
no regulatory purpose in extending the
monitoring requirements to embrace a
full application of section 9(a)’s
eligibility restrictions because of mixed
funding or shared funding and sales to
Qualified Plans, an Adviser or General
Accounts. Applicants represent that the
Participating Insurance Companies and
Qualified Plans are not expected to play
any role in the management of the
Insurance Funds. Applicants argue that
those individuals who participate in the
management of the Insurance Funds
will remain the same regardless of
which Separate Accounts or Qualified
Plans invest in the Insurance Funds.
Applying the monitoring requirements
of section 9(a) of the 1940 Act because
of investment by Separate Accounts of
Participating Insurance Companies or
Qualified Plans would be unjustified
and would not serve any regulatory
purpose. Furthermore, the increased
monitoring costs could reduce the net
rates of return realized by contract
owners and Qualified Plan holders.
9. Rules 6e–2(b)(15)(iii) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15)(iii) under the 1940 Act
provide exemptions from the passthrough voting requirement with respect
to several significant matters, assuming
the limitations on mixed and shared
funding are observed. Rules 6e–
2(b)(15)(iii)(A) and 6e–3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A)
provide that the insurance company
may disregard the voting instructions of
its contract owners with respect to the
investments of an underlying fund, or
any contract between such a fund and
its investment adviser, when required to
do so by an insurance regulatory
authority (subject to the provisions of
paragraphs (b)(5)(i) and (b)(7)(ii)(A) of
Rules 6e–2 and 6e–3(T), respectively,
under the 1940 Act). Rules 6e–
2(b)(15)(iii)(B) and 6e–
3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A)(2) provide that the
insurance company may disregard the
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
51872
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
voting instructions of its contract
owners if the contract owners initiate
any change in an underlying fund’s
investment policies, principal
underwriter, or any investment adviser
(provided that disregarding such voting
instructions is reasonable and subject to
the other provisions of paragraphs
(b)(5)(ii), (b)(7)(ii)(B), and (b)(7)(ii)(C),
respectively, of Rules 6e–2 and 6e–3(T)
under the 1940 Act).
10. Rule 6e–2 under the 1940 Act
recognizes that a variable life insurance
contract, as an insurance contract, has
important elements unique to insurance
contracts and is subject to extensive
state regulation of insurance. In
adopting Rule 6e–2(b)(15)(iii), the
Commission expressly recognized that
state insurance regulators have
authority, pursuant to state insurance
laws or regulations, to disapprove or
require changes in investment policies,
investment advisers, or principal
underwriters. The Commission also
expressly recognized that state
insurance regulators have authority to
require an insurer to draw from its
general account to cover costs imposed
upon the insurer by a change approved
by contract owners over the insurer’s
objection. The Commission, therefore,
deemed such exemptions necessary ‘‘to
assure the solvency of the life insurer
and performance of its contractual
obligations by enabling an insurance
regulatory authority or the life insurer to
act when certain proposals reasonably
could be expected to increase the risks
undertaken by the life insurer.’’ In this
respect, flexible premium variable life
insurance contracts are identical to
scheduled premium variable life
insurance contracts. Applicants,
therefore, assert that the corresponding
provisions of Rule 6e–3(T) under the
1940 Act undoubtedly were adopted in
recognition of the same factors.
11. Applicants also assert that the sale
of Shares to Qualified Plans, an Adviser
and General Accounts will not have any
impact on the relief requested herein.
With respect to the Qualified Plans,
which are not registered as investment
companies under the 1940 Act, shares of
a portfolio of an investment company
sold to a Qualified Plan must be held by
the trustees of the Qualified Plan
pursuant to section 403(a) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act, as amended (‘‘ERISA’’). Applicants
note that (1) Section 403(a) of ERISA
endows Qualified Plan trustees with the
exclusive authority and responsibility
for voting proxies provided neither of
two enumerated exceptions to that
provision applies; (2) some of the
Qualified Plans may provide for the
trustee(s), an investment adviser (or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
advisers), or another named fiduciary to
exercise voting rights in accordance
with instructions from participants; and
(3) there is no requirement to pass
through voting rights to Qualified Plan
participants.
12. Applicants argue that an
Investment Manager and General
Accounts are similar in that they are not
subject to any pass-through voting
requirements. Applicants therefore
conclude that, unlike the case with
insurance company Separate Accounts,
the issue of resolution of material
irreconcilable conflicts with respect to
voting is not present with Eligible
Purchasers.
13. Applicants represent that where a
Qualified Plan does not provide
participants with the right to give voting
instructions, the trustee or named
fiduciary has responsibility to vote the
shares held by the Qualified Plan. In
this circumstance, the trustee has a
fiduciary duty to vote the shares in the
best interest of the Qualified Plan
participants. Accordingly, even if an
Adviser or an affiliate of an Adviser
were to serve in the capacity of trustee
or named fiduciary with voting
responsibilities, an Adviser or its
affiliates would have a fiduciary duty to
vote relevant Shares in the best interest
of the Qualified Plan participants.
14. Further, Applicants assert that
even if a Qualified Plan were to hold a
controlling interest in a Portfolio,
Applicants do not believe that such
control would disadvantage other
investors in such Portfolio to any greater
extent than is the case when any
institutional shareholder holds a
majority of the voting securities of any
open-end management investment
company. In this regard, Applicants
submit that investment in a Portfolio by
a Qualified Plan will not create any of
the voting complications occasioned by
mixed funding or shared funding.
Unlike mixed funding or shared
funding, Applicants argue that Qualified
Plan investor voting rights cannot be
frustrated by veto rights of insurers or
state regulators.
15. Where a Qualified Plan provides
participants with the right to give voting
instructions, Applicants see no reason
to believe that participants in Qualified
Plans generally or those in a particular
Qualified Plan, either as a single group
or in combination with participants in
other Qualified Plans, would vote in a
manner that would disadvantage
Variable Contract holders. Applicants
assert that the purchase of Shares by
Qualified Plans that provide voting
rights does not present any
complications not otherwise occasioned
by mixed or shared funding.
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16. Applicants do not believe that sale
of the Shares to Qualified Plans will
increase the potential for material
irreconcilable conflicts of interest
between or among different types of
investors. In particular, Applicants see
very little potential for such conflicts
beyond those which would otherwise
exist between Variable Contract owners.
17. Applicants assert that permitting
an Insurance Fund to sell its shares to
an Adviser or to the General Account of
a Participating Insurance Company will
enhance management of each Insurance
Fund without raising significant
concerns regarding material
irreconcilable conflicts. Unlike the
circumstances of many investment
companies that serve as underlying
investment media for variable insurance
products, the Fund may be deemed to
lack an insurance company ‘‘promoter’’
for purposes of Rule 14a–2 under the
1940 Act. Accordingly, the Fund and
any other such Future Funds or
Portfolios that are established as new
registrants will be subject to the
requirements of section 14(a) of the
1940 Act, which generally requires that
an investment company have a net
worth of $100,000 upon making a public
offering of its shares. Portfolios also will
require more limited amounts of initial
capital in connection with the creation
of new series and the voting of initial
shares of such series on matters
requiring the approval of shareholders.
A potential source of the requisite initial
capital is a Portfolio’s adviser or a
Participating Insurance Company. Either
of these parties may have an interest in
making the requisite capital investments
and in participating with an Insurance
Fund in its organization. Applicants
note, however, that the provision of
seed capital or the purchase of shares in
connection with the management of an
Insurance Fund by its investment
adviser or by a Participating Insurance
Company may be deemed to violate the
exclusivity requirement of Rule 6e–
2(b)(15) and/or Rule 6e–3(T)(b)(15).
18. Given the conditions of Treas.
Reg. Section 1.817–5(f)(3) and the
harmony of interest between an
Insurance Fund, on the one hand, and
an Adviser or a Participating Insurance
Company, on the other, Applicants
assert that little incentive for
overreaching exists. Furthermore,
Applicants assert such investment
should not implicate the concerns
discussed above regarding the creation
of material irreconcilable conflicts.
Instead, Applicants argue that
permitting investments by an Adviser,
or by General Accounts, will permit the
orderly and efficient creation of an
Insurance Fund, and reduce the expense
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
and uncertainty of using outside parties
at the early stages of the Insurance
Fund’s operations.
Applicants’ Conditions
Applicants agree that the order
granting the requested relief shall be
subject to the following conditions:
1. A majority of the Board of Trustees
(the ‘‘Board’’) of each Insurance Fund
will consist of persons who are not
‘‘interested persons’’ of the Insurance
Fund, as defined by section 2(a)(19) of
the 1940 Act, and the rules thereunder,
and as modified by any applicable
orders of the Commission, except that if
this condition is not met by reason of
the death, disqualification, or bona-fide
resignation of any trustee or trustees,
then the operation of this condition will
be suspended: (a) For a period of 90
days if the vacancy or vacancies may be
filled by the Board; (b) for a period of
150 days if a vote of shareholders is
required to fill the vacancy or vacancies;
or (c) for such longer period as the
Commission may prescribe by order
upon application or by future rule.
2. The Board of each Insurance Fund
will monitor the Insurance Fund for the
existence of any material irreconcilable
conflict between the interests of the
contract owners of all Separate
Accounts and participants of all
Qualified Plans investing in the
Insurance Fund, and determine what
action, if any, should be taken in
response to such conflicts. A material
irreconcilable conflict may arise for a
variety of reasons, including: (a) An
action by any state insurance regulatory
authority; (b) a change in applicable
federal or state insurance, tax, or
securities laws or regulations, or a
public ruling, private letter ruling, noaction or interpretative letter, or any
similar action by insurance, tax, or
securities regulatory authorities; (c) an
administrative or judicial decision in
any relevant proceeding; (d) the manner
in which the investments of the
Insurance Fund are being managed; (e)
a difference in voting instructions given
by variable annuity contract owners,
variable life insurance contract owners,
and trustees of the Qualified Plans; (f)
a decision by a Participating Insurance
Company to disregard the voting
instructions of contract owners; or (g) if
applicable, a decision by a Qualified
Plan to disregard the voting instructions
of Qualified Plan participants.
3. Participating Insurance Companies
(on their own behalf, as well as by
virtue of any investment of General
Account assets in an Insurance Fund),
an Adviser, and any trustee on behalf of
a Qualified Plan that executes a
Participation Agreement upon becoming
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
an owner of 10 percent or more of the
assets of an Insurance Fund
(collectively, ‘‘Participants’’) will report
any potential or existing conflicts to the
Board of the relevant Insurance Fund.
Participants will be responsible for
assisting the Board in carrying out the
Board’s responsibilities under these
conditions by providing the Board with
all information reasonably necessary for
the Board to consider any issues raised.
This responsibility includes, but is not
limited to, an obligation of each
Participating Insurance Company to
inform the Board whenever contract
owner voting instructions are
disregarded, and, if pass-through voting
is applicable, an obligation by each
Trustee for a Qualified Plan to inform
the Board whenever it has determined
to disregard Qualified Plan participant
voting instructions. The responsibility
to report such information and conflicts,
and to assist the Board, will be a
contractual obligation of all
Participating Insurance Companies
under their Participation Agreements
with the relevant Insurance Fund, and
these responsibilities will be carried out
with a view only to the interests of the
contract owners. The responsibility to
report such information and conflicts,
and to assist the Board, also will be
contractual obligations of all Qualified
Plans under their Participation
Agreements, and such agreements will
provide that these responsibilities will
be carried out with a view only to the
interests of Qualified Plan participants.
4. If it is determined by a majority of
the Board of an Insurance Fund, or a
majority of the disinterested directors/
trustees of such Board, that a material
irreconcilable conflict exists, then the
relevant Participant will, at its expense
and to the extent reasonably practicable
(as determined by a majority of the
disinterested directors/trustees), take
whatever steps are necessary to remedy
or eliminate the material irreconcilable
conflict, up to and including: (a)
Withdrawing the assets allocable to
some or all of the Separate Accounts
from the relevant Insurance Fund and
reinvesting such assets in a different
investment vehicle including another
Insurance Fund, submitting the question
as to whether such segregation should
be implemented to a vote of all affected
contract or policy owners and, as
appropriate, segregating the assets of
any appropriate group (i.e., variable
annuity contract owners or variable life
insurance contract owners of one or
more Participating Insurance
Companies) that votes in favor of such
segregation, or offering to the affected
contract owners the option of making
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51873
such a change; and (b) establishing a
new registered management investment
company or managed separate account.
If a material irreconcilable conflict
arises because of a decision by a
Participating Insurance Company to
disregard contract or policy owner
voting instructions, and that decision
represents a minority position or would
preclude a majority vote, then the
Participating Insurance Company may
be required, at the election of the
relevant Insurance Fund, to withdraw
such Participating Insurance Company’s
Separate Account investment in the
Insurance Fund, and no charge or
penalty will be imposed as a result of
such withdrawal. The responsibility to
take remedial action in the event of a
Board determination of a material
irreconcilable conflict and to bear the
cost of such remedial action will be a
contractual obligation of all Participants
under their Participation Agreement
with the relevant Insurance Fund, and
these responsibilities will be carried out
with a view only to the interests of
contract owners and Qualified Plan
participants. For purposes of this
Condition 4, a majority of the
disinterested directors/ trustees of the
Board of each Insurance Fund will
determine whether or not any proposed
action adequately remedies any material
irreconcilable conflict, but in no event
will the Insurance Fund or an Adviser,
as relevant, be required to establish a
new funding vehicle for any Variable
Contract. No Participating Insurance
Company will be required by this
Condition 4 to establish a new funding
vehicle for any Variable Contract if any
offer to do so has been declined by vote
of a majority of the contract or policy
owners materially and adversely
affected by the material irreconcilable
conflict. Further, no Qualified Plan will
be required by this Condition 4 to
establish a new funding vehicle for the
Qualified Plan if: (a) A majority of the
Qualified Plan participants materially
and adversely affected by the
irreconcilable material conflict vote to
decline such offer; or (b) pursuant to
documents governing the Qualified
Plan, the Qualified Plan makes such
decision without a Qualified Plan
participant vote.
5. The Board of each Insurance Fund’s
determination of the existence of a
material irreconcilable conflict and its
implications will be made known in
writing promptly to all Participants.
6. As to Variable Contracts issued by
Separate Accounts registered under the
1940 Act, Participating Insurance
Companies will provide pass-through
voting privileges to all Variable Contract
owners as required by the 1940 Act as
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
51874
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 11, 2007 / Notices
interpreted by the Commission.
However, as to Variable Contracts
issued by unregistered Separate
Accounts, pass-through voting
privileges will be extended to contract
owners to the extent granted by the
issuing insurance company.
Accordingly, such Participants, where
applicable, will vote the Shares held in
their Separate Accounts in a manner
consistent with voting instructions
timely received from Variable Contract
owners. Participating Insurance
Companies will be responsible for
assuring that each Separate Account
investing in the relevant Insurance Fund
calculates voting privileges in a manner
consistent with other Participants. The
obligation to calculate voting privileges
as provided in the Application will be
a contractual obligation of all
Participating Insurance Companies
under their Participation Agreement
with the relevant Insurance Fund. Each
Participating Insurance Company will
vote shares for which it has not received
timely voting instructions, as well as
shares held in its General Account or
otherwise attributed to it, in the same
proportion as it votes those shares for
which it has received voting
instructions. Each Qualified Plan will
vote as required by applicable law and
governing Qualified Plan documents.
7. As long as the 1940 Act requires
pass-through voting privileges to be
provided to Variable Contract owners,
an Adviser, who has provided seed
capital for the Insurance Fund, and any
General Account will vote their
respective Shares in the same
proportion as all variable contract
owners having voting rights with
respect to that Insurance Fund;
provided, however, that an Adviser or
any General Account shall vote its
Shares in such other manner as may be
required by the Commission or its staff.
8. Each Insurance Fund will comply
with all provisions of the 1940 Act
requiring voting by shareholders, which,
for these purposes, shall be the persons
having a voting interest in the Shares,
and, in particular, the Insurance Fund
will either provide for annual meetings
(except to the extent that the
Commission may interpret section 16 of
the 1940 Act not to require such
meetings) or comply with section 16(c)
of the 1940 Act (although each
Insurance Fund is not, or will not be,
one of those trusts of the type described
in section 16(c) of the 1940 Act), as well
as with section 16(a) of the 1940 Act
and, if and when applicable, section
16(b) of the 1940 Act. Further, each
Insurance Fund will act in accordance
with the Commission’s interpretations
of the requirements of section 16(a) with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Sep 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
respect to periodic elections of
directors/trustees and with whatever
rules the Commission may promulgate
thereto.
9. An Insurance Fund will make its
Shares available to the Separate
Accounts and Qualified Plans at or
about the time it accepts any seed
capital from an Adviser or General
Account of a Participating Insurance
Company.
10. Each Insurance Fund has notified,
or will notify, all Participants that
Separate Account prospectus disclosure
or Qualified Plan prospectuses or other
Qualified Plan disclosure documents
regarding potential risks of mixed and
shared funding may be appropriate.
Each Insurance Fund will disclose, in
its prospectus that: (a) Shares of the
Existing Funds may be offered to
Separate Accounts funding both
variable annuity contracts and variable
life insurance policies and, if
applicable, to Qualified Plans; (b) due to
differences in tax treatment and other
considerations, the interests of various
contract owners participating in the
Insurance Fund and the interests of
Qualified Plans investing in the
Insurance Fund, if applicable, may
conflict; and (c) the Insurance Fund’s
Board will monitor events in order to
identify the existence of any material
irreconcilable conflicts and to determine
what action, if any, should be taken in
response to any such conflict.
11. If and to the extent that Rule 6e–
2 and Rule 6e–3(T) under the 1940 Act
are amended, or proposed Rule 6e–3
under the 1940 Act is adopted, to
provide exemptive relief from any
provision of the 1940 Act, or the rules
promulgated thereunder, with respect to
mixed or shared funding, on terms and
conditions materially different from any
exemptions granted in the order
requested in the Application, then each
Insurance Fund and/or Participating
Insurance Companies, as appropriate,
shall take such steps as may be
necessary to comply with Rules 6e–2
and 6e–3(T), or Rule 6e–3, as such rules
are applicable.
12. Each Participant, at least annually,
will submit to the Board of Each
Insurance Fund such reports, materials,
or data as a Board reasonably may
request so that the directors/trustees of
the Board may fully carry out the
obligations imposed upon the Board by
the conditions contained in the
Application. Such reports, materials,
and data will be submitted more
frequently if deemed appropriate by the
Board of an Insurance Fund. The
obligations of the Participants to
provide these reports, materials, and
data to the Board, when it so reasonably
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requests, will be a contractual obligation
of all Participants under their
Participation Agreements with the
relevant Insurance Fund.
13. All reports of potential or existing
conflicts received by the Board of each
Insurance Fund, and all Board action
with regard to determining the existence
of a conflict, notifying Participants of a
conflict and determining whether any
proposed action adequately remedies a
conflict, will be properly recorded in
the minutes of the Board or other
appropriate records, and such minutes
or other records shall be made available
to the Commission upon request.
14. Each Insurance Fund will not
accept a purchase order from a
Qualified Plan if such purchase would
make the Qualified Plan an owner of 10
percent or more of the assets of the
Insurance Fund unless the Trustee for
such Qualified Plan executes an
agreement with the Insurance Fund
governing participation in the Insurance
Fund that includes the conditions set
forth herein to the extent applicable. A
Trustee for a Qualified Plan will execute
an application containing an
acknowledgement of this condition at
the time of its initial purchase of Shares.
Conclusions
Applicants submit that, for the
reasons summarized above and to the
extent necessary or appropriate to
provide for the transactions described
herein, the requested exemptions from
sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of
the 1940 Act and Rules 6e–2(b)(15) and
6e–3(T)(b)(15) thereunder, in
accordance with the standards of
section 6(c) of the 1940 Act, are in the
public interest and consistent with the
protection of investors and the purposes
fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the 1940 Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–17786 Filed 9–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51869-51874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-17786]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. IC-27965; File No. 812-13359]
Financial Investors Variable Insurance Trust et al., Notice of
Application September 4, 2007
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or the
``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of application (``Application'') for exemption, pursuant
to section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the
``1940 Act''), from the provisions of sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and
15(b) of the Act and Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) thereunder.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants: Ibbotson Conservative ETF Asset Allocation Portfolio,
Ibbotson Income and Growth ETF Asset Allocation Portfolio, Ibbotson
Balanced ETF Asset Allocation Portfolio, Ibbotson Growth ETF Asset
Allocation Portfolio, Ibbotson Aggressive Growth ETF Asset Allocation
Portfolio (collectively, the ``Existing Funds''), each a series of
Financial Investors Variable Insurance Trust (the ``Trust''), any other
series established from time to time under the Trust (collectively with
the Existing Funds, the ``Insurance Funds''), and any future investment
company that is designed to fund insurance products and for which ALPS
Advisers, Inc. (the ``Investment Adviser''), any successor in interest
(collectively with the Investment Adviser, the ``Investment
Advisers''), or any affiliates of the Investment Advisers may serve as
investment manager, investment adviser, subadviser, administrator,
principal underwriter or sponsor (funds advised by such Investment
Advisers herein also referred to collectively as the ``Insurance
Funds'') (the Trust, the Existing Funds, the Insurance Funds, the
Investment Adviser, and the Investment Advisers, referred to
collectively as the ``Applicants'').
Summary of Application: The Applicants request an order exempting
certain life insurance companies on behalf of their separate accounts
that currently invest or may hereafter invest in the Insurance Funds to
the extent necessary to permit shares of the Existing Funds (the
``Shares'') and the Insurance Funds to be sold to and held by: (i)
Separate accounts funding variable annuity contracts and variable life
insurance policies (collectively ``Variable Contracts'') issued by both
affiliated life insurance companies and unaffiliated life insurance
companies; (ii) trustees of qualified group pension and group
retirement plans outside of the separate account context (``Qualified
Plans''); (iii) separate accounts that are not registered as investment
companies under the 1940 Act pursuant to exemptions from registration
under section 3(c) of the 1940 Act; (iv) any Adviser to an Insurance
Fund that is permitted to hold shares in an Insurance Fund consistent
with the requirements of regulations issued by the Treasury Department
(individually a ``Treasury Regulation'' and collectively the ``Treasury
Regulations''), specifically Treasury Regulation Section 1.817-5 for
the purpose of providing seed capital to an Insurance Fund; and (v) any
other Participating Insurance Company permitted to hold shares of an
Insurance Fund (``General Accounts'').
Filing Date: The Application was filed on January 26, 2007, and
amended and restated on May 21, 2007.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the
application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Secretary of
the Commission and serving Applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the
Commission by 5:30 p.m. on September 26, 2007, and should be
accompanied by proof of service on Applicants in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests
should state the nature of the requester's interest, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by writing to the Secretary of the
Commission.
ADDRESSES: The Commission: Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090; Applicants:
c/o Jeffrey T. Pike, Esq., Secretary, Financial Investors Variable
Insurance Trust, 1290 Broadway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80203.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey A. Foor, Senior Counsel, or
Zandra Y. Bailes, Branch Chief, Office of Insurance Products, Division
of Investment Management, at (202) 551-6795.
[[Page 51870]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
Application. The complete Application is available for a fee from the
SEC's Public Reference Branch, 100 F Street, NE., Room 1580,
Washington, DC 20549 (telephone (202) 551-8090).
Applicants' Representations
1. Each Insurance Fund is, or will be, registered under the 1940
Act as an open-end management investment company. The Trust (File No.
811-21987) is registered under the 1940 Act as a non-diversified
management investment company. Applicants state that the Trust's shares
are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ``1933
Act'') (File No. 333-139186) and the investment adviser to the Trust,
ALPS Advisers, Inc. is registered with the Commission as an investment
adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended.
2. Applicants state that the Existing Funds intend to, and other
Insurance Funds may in the future, offer Shares to separate accounts of
affiliated and unaffiliated insurance companies funding variable
annuity or variable life products. Applicants state that these separate
accounts are, or will be, registered as investment companies under the
1940 Act or will be exempt from such registration (individually a
``Separate Account'' and collectively the ``Separate Accounts'').
Insurance companies whose Separate Account(s) may now or in the future
own Shares are referred to herein as ``Participating Insurance
Companies.''
3. Applicants propose that the Funds be permitted to offer and/or
sell shares to Separate Accounts funding Variable Contracts issued by
Participating Insurance Companies. Applicants represent that the
Participating Insurance Companies at the time of their investment in
the Insurance Funds either have established or will establish their own
Separate Accounts and design their own Variable Contracts. Each
Participating Insurance Company has or will have the legal obligation
of satisfying all applicable requirements under both state and federal
law. Applicants represent that each Participating Insurance Company on
behalf of its Separate Accounts has entered or will enter into an
agreement with each Insurance Fund in which it invests concerning
participation by the Participating Insurance Company in such Insurance
Fund (a ``Participation Agreement''). The role of the Insurance Funds
under this agreement, insofar as the federal securities laws are
applicable, will consist of, among other things, offering shares to the
Separate Accounts and complying with any conditions that the Commission
may impose.
4. Applicants propose that the Insurance Funds also be permitted to
offer and/or sell Shares to Qualified Plans administered by a Trustee.
Section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
``Code''), imposes certain diversification standards on the underlying
assets of Separate Accounts funding Variable Contracts. The Code
provides that Variable Contracts shall not be treated as an annuity
contract or life insurance policy for any period (or any subsequent
period) for which the underlying assets are not, in accordance with
regulations prescribed by the Treasury Department, (individually, a
``Treasury Regulation'' and collectively the ``Treasury Regulations''),
adequately diversified. On March 2, 1989, the Treasury Department
issued Treasury Regulations (Treas. Reg. Section 1.817-5) that
established diversification requirements for Variable Contracts, which
require the Separate Accounts upon which these contracts or policies
are based to be diversified as provided in the Treasury Regulations. In
the case of Separate Accounts that invest in underlying investment
companies, the Treasury Regulations provide a ``look through'' rule
that permits the Separate Account to look to the underlying investment
company for purposes of meeting the diversification requirements,
provided that the beneficial interests in the investment company are
held only by the segregated asset accounts of one or more insurance
companies. However, the Treasury Regulations also contain certain
exceptions to this requirement, one of which allows shares in an
investment company to be held by the trustee of a qualified pension or
retirement plan without adversely affecting the tax status of Variable
Contracts (Treas. Reg. Section 1.817-5(f)(3)(iii)). Another exception
allows the investment manager of the investment company and certain
companies related to the investment manager to hold shares of the
investment company, an exception that is often used to provide the
capital required by section 14(a) of the 1940 Act.
5. Applicants also propose that the Funds be permitted to offer
and/or sell shares to an Adviser for the purpose of providing initial
capital to an Insurance Fund and to General Accounts. The Regulations
permit such sales to an Adviser and to General Accounts so long as the
return on shares held by each is computed in the same manner as for
shares held by the Separate Accounts, and the Adviser and the General
Accounts do not intend to sell shares of the Portfolio held by it to
the public. The Treasury Regulations impose an additional restriction
on sales to investment advisers, who may hold shares only in connection
with the creation of an Insurance Fund. Applicants anticipate that
sales in reliance on these provisions of the Treasury Regulations will
be made to an Adviser for the purpose of providing the initial capital
for a Fund and that any Shares purchased by an Adviser will be redeemed
immediately if and when the Adviser's investment advisory agreement
terminates.
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. In connection with the funding of scheduled premium variable
life insurance contracts issued through a Separate Account registered
as a unit investment trust (``UIT'') under the 1940 Act, Rule 6e-
2(b)(15) provides partial exemptions from sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a)
and 15(b) of the 1940 Act. Section 9(a)(2) of the 1940 Act makes it
unlawful for any company to serve as an investment adviser or principal
underwriter of any UIT, if an affiliated person of that company is
subject to a disqualification enumerated in section 9(a)(1) or (2) of
the 1940 Act. Sections 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act have been
deemed by the Commission to require ``pass-through'' voting with
respect to an underlying investment company's shares. Rule 6e-2(b)(15)
provides these exemptions apply only where all of the assets of the UIT
are shares of management investment companies ``which offer their
shares exclusively to variable life insurance separate accounts of the
life insurer or of any affiliated life insurance company.'' Therefore,
the relief granted by Rule 6e-2(b)(15) is not available with respect to
a scheduled premium life insurance Separate Account that owns shares of
an underlying fund that also offers its shares to a variable annuity
Separate Account or flexible premium variable life insurance Separate
Account of the same company or any other affiliated insurance company.
The use of a common management investment company as the underlying
investment vehicle for both variable annuity and variable life
insurance separate accounts of the same life insurance company or of
any affiliated life insurance company is referred to herein as ``mixed
funding.''
2. The relief granted by Rule 6e-2(b)(15) also is not available
with respect to a scheduled premium variable
[[Page 51871]]
life insurance Separate Account that owns shares of an underlying fund
that also offers its shares to Separate Accounts funding Variable
Contracts of one or more unaffiliated life insurance companies. The use
of a common management investment company as the underlying investment
vehicle for variable annuity and/or variable life insurance Separate
Accounts of unaffiliated life insurance companies is referred to herein
as ``shared funding.''
3. Moreover, because the relief under Rule 6e-2(b)(15) is available
only where shares are offered exclusively to variable life insurance
Separate Accounts of a life insurer or any affiliated life insurance
company, additional exemptive relief is necessary if the Shares are
also to be sold to Qualified Plans, an Adviser and General Accounts
(collectively, ``Eligible Purchasers''). Applicants note that if the
Shares were sold only to Separate Accounts funding variable annuity
contracts and/or Eligible Purchasers, exemptive relief under Rule 6e-
2(b)(15) would not be necessary. The relief provided for under this
section does not relate to Eligible Purchasers or to a registered
investment company's ability to sell its shares to Eligible Purchasers.
The use of a common management investment company as the underlying
investment vehicle for Separate Accounts funding Variable Contracts
issued by affiliated and unaffiliated insurance companies, and for
Eligible Purchasers, is referred to herein as ``extended mixed and
shared funding.''
4. In connection with flexible premium variable life insurance
contracts issued through a separate account registered under the 1940
Act as a UIT, Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(15) provides partial exemptions from
sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act. The exemptions
granted by Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(15) are available only where all the assets
of the Separate Account consist of the shares of one or more registered
management investment companies that offer to sell their shares
``exclusively to separate accounts of the life insurer, or of any
affiliated life insurance companies, offering either scheduled
contracts or flexible contracts, or both; or which also offer their
shares to variable annuity separate accounts of the life insurer or of
an affiliated life insurance company or which offer their shares to any
such life insurance company in consideration solely for advances made
by the life insurer in connection with the operation of the separate
account.'' Therefore, Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(15) permits mixed funding but
does not permit shared funding.
5. Moreover, because the relief under Rule 6e-3(T) is available
only where shares are offered exclusively to variable life insurance
separate accounts of a life insurer or any affiliated life insurance
company, additional exemptive relief is necessary if the shares of the
Portfolios are also to be sold to Eligible Purchasers, as described
above. Applicants note that if the Shares were sold only to Separate
Accounts funding variable annuity contracts and/or Eligible Purchasers,
exemptive relief under Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(15) would not be necessary. The
relief provided for under this section does not relate to Eligible
Purchasers or to a registered investment company's ability to sell its
shares to Eligible Purchasers.
6. Applicants maintain, as discussed below, that there is no policy
reason for the sale of the Portfolios' shares to Eligible Purchasers to
result in a prohibition against, or otherwise limit a Participating
Insurance Company from relying on the relief provided by Rules 6e-
2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15). However, because the relief under Rules
6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) is available only when shares are
offered exclusively to Separate Accounts, additional exemptive relief
may be necessary if the shares of the Portfolios are also to be sold to
Eligible Purchasers. Applicants therefore request relief in order to
have the Participating Insurance Companies enjoy the benefits of the
relief granted in Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) even where
Eligible Purchasers are investing in the relevant Insurance Fund.
Applicants note that if the Shares were to be sold only to Eligible
Purchasers, and/or Separate Accounts funding variable annuity
contracts, exemptive relief under Rule 6e-2(b)(15) and Rule 6e-
3(T)(b)(15) would be unnecessary. The relief provided for under Rules
6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15) does not relate to Eligible Purchasers,
or to a registered investment company's ability to sell its shares to
Eligible Purchasers.
7. Consistent with the Commission's authority under section 6(c) of
the 1940 Act to grant exemptive orders to a class or classes of persons
and transactions, the Application requests relief for the class
consisting of Participating Insurance Companies and their Separate
Accounts (and to the extent necessary, investment advisers, principal
underwriters and depositors of such Separate Accounts).
8. In effect, the partial relief granted in Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and
6e-3(T)(b)(15) under the 1940 Act from the requirements of section 9 of
the 1940 Act limits the amount of monitoring necessary to ensure
compliance with section 9 to that which is appropriate in light of the
policy and purposes of section 9. Those rules recognize that it is not
necessary for the protection of investors or the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of the 1940 Act to apply the
provisions of section 9(a) to individuals in a large insurance complex,
most of whom will have no involvement in matters pertaining to
investment companies in that organization. Applicants assert that it is
also unnecessary to apply section 9(a) of the 1940 Act to the many
individuals in various unaffiliated insurance companies (or affiliated
companies of Participating Insurance Companies) that may utilize the
Insurance Funds as investment vehicles for Variable Contracts.
Applicants argue that there is no regulatory purpose in extending the
monitoring requirements to embrace a full application of section 9(a)'s
eligibility restrictions because of mixed funding or shared funding and
sales to Qualified Plans, an Adviser or General Accounts. Applicants
represent that the Participating Insurance Companies and Qualified
Plans are not expected to play any role in the management of the
Insurance Funds. Applicants argue that those individuals who
participate in the management of the Insurance Funds will remain the
same regardless of which Separate Accounts or Qualified Plans invest in
the Insurance Funds. Applying the monitoring requirements of section
9(a) of the 1940 Act because of investment by Separate Accounts of
Participating Insurance Companies or Qualified Plans would be
unjustified and would not serve any regulatory purpose. Furthermore,
the increased monitoring costs could reduce the net rates of return
realized by contract owners and Qualified Plan holders.
9. Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(iii) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15)(iii) under the 1940
Act provide exemptions from the pass-through voting requirement with
respect to several significant matters, assuming the limitations on
mixed and shared funding are observed. Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(iii)(A) and
6e-3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A) provide that the insurance company may disregard
the voting instructions of its contract owners with respect to the
investments of an underlying fund, or any contract between such a fund
and its investment adviser, when required to do so by an insurance
regulatory authority (subject to the provisions of paragraphs (b)(5)(i)
and (b)(7)(ii)(A) of Rules 6e-2 and 6e-3(T), respectively, under the
1940 Act). Rules 6e-2(b)(15)(iii)(B) and 6e-3(T)(b)(15)(iii)(A)(2)
provide that the insurance company may disregard the
[[Page 51872]]
voting instructions of its contract owners if the contract owners
initiate any change in an underlying fund's investment policies,
principal underwriter, or any investment adviser (provided that
disregarding such voting instructions is reasonable and subject to the
other provisions of paragraphs (b)(5)(ii), (b)(7)(ii)(B), and
(b)(7)(ii)(C), respectively, of Rules 6e-2 and 6e-3(T) under the 1940
Act).
10. Rule 6e-2 under the 1940 Act recognizes that a variable life
insurance contract, as an insurance contract, has important elements
unique to insurance contracts and is subject to extensive state
regulation of insurance. In adopting Rule 6e-2(b)(15)(iii), the
Commission expressly recognized that state insurance regulators have
authority, pursuant to state insurance laws or regulations, to
disapprove or require changes in investment policies, investment
advisers, or principal underwriters. The Commission also expressly
recognized that state insurance regulators have authority to require an
insurer to draw from its general account to cover costs imposed upon
the insurer by a change approved by contract owners over the insurer's
objection. The Commission, therefore, deemed such exemptions necessary
``to assure the solvency of the life insurer and performance of its
contractual obligations by enabling an insurance regulatory authority
or the life insurer to act when certain proposals reasonably could be
expected to increase the risks undertaken by the life insurer.'' In
this respect, flexible premium variable life insurance contracts are
identical to scheduled premium variable life insurance contracts.
Applicants, therefore, assert that the corresponding provisions of Rule
6e-3(T) under the 1940 Act undoubtedly were adopted in recognition of
the same factors.
11. Applicants also assert that the sale of Shares to Qualified
Plans, an Adviser and General Accounts will not have any impact on the
relief requested herein. With respect to the Qualified Plans, which are
not registered as investment companies under the 1940 Act, shares of a
portfolio of an investment company sold to a Qualified Plan must be
held by the trustees of the Qualified Plan pursuant to section 403(a)
of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended (``ERISA'').
Applicants note that (1) Section 403(a) of ERISA endows Qualified Plan
trustees with the exclusive authority and responsibility for voting
proxies provided neither of two enumerated exceptions to that provision
applies; (2) some of the Qualified Plans may provide for the
trustee(s), an investment adviser (or advisers), or another named
fiduciary to exercise voting rights in accordance with instructions
from participants; and (3) there is no requirement to pass through
voting rights to Qualified Plan participants.
12. Applicants argue that an Investment Manager and General
Accounts are similar in that they are not subject to any pass-through
voting requirements. Applicants therefore conclude that, unlike the
case with insurance company Separate Accounts, the issue of resolution
of material irreconcilable conflicts with respect to voting is not
present with Eligible Purchasers.
13. Applicants represent that where a Qualified Plan does not
provide participants with the right to give voting instructions, the
trustee or named fiduciary has responsibility to vote the shares held
by the Qualified Plan. In this circumstance, the trustee has a
fiduciary duty to vote the shares in the best interest of the Qualified
Plan participants. Accordingly, even if an Adviser or an affiliate of
an Adviser were to serve in the capacity of trustee or named fiduciary
with voting responsibilities, an Adviser or its affiliates would have a
fiduciary duty to vote relevant Shares in the best interest of the
Qualified Plan participants.
14. Further, Applicants assert that even if a Qualified Plan were
to hold a controlling interest in a Portfolio, Applicants do not
believe that such control would disadvantage other investors in such
Portfolio to any greater extent than is the case when any institutional
shareholder holds a majority of the voting securities of any open-end
management investment company. In this regard, Applicants submit that
investment in a Portfolio by a Qualified Plan will not create any of
the voting complications occasioned by mixed funding or shared funding.
Unlike mixed funding or shared funding, Applicants argue that Qualified
Plan investor voting rights cannot be frustrated by veto rights of
insurers or state regulators.
15. Where a Qualified Plan provides participants with the right to
give voting instructions, Applicants see no reason to believe that
participants in Qualified Plans generally or those in a particular
Qualified Plan, either as a single group or in combination with
participants in other Qualified Plans, would vote in a manner that
would disadvantage Variable Contract holders. Applicants assert that
the purchase of Shares by Qualified Plans that provide voting rights
does not present any complications not otherwise occasioned by mixed or
shared funding.
16. Applicants do not believe that sale of the Shares to Qualified
Plans will increase the potential for material irreconcilable conflicts
of interest between or among different types of investors. In
particular, Applicants see very little potential for such conflicts
beyond those which would otherwise exist between Variable Contract
owners.
17. Applicants assert that permitting an Insurance Fund to sell its
shares to an Adviser or to the General Account of a Participating
Insurance Company will enhance management of each Insurance Fund
without raising significant concerns regarding material irreconcilable
conflicts. Unlike the circumstances of many investment companies that
serve as underlying investment media for variable insurance products,
the Fund may be deemed to lack an insurance company ``promoter'' for
purposes of Rule 14a-2 under the 1940 Act. Accordingly, the Fund and
any other such Future Funds or Portfolios that are established as new
registrants will be subject to the requirements of section 14(a) of the
1940 Act, which generally requires that an investment company have a
net worth of $100,000 upon making a public offering of its shares.
Portfolios also will require more limited amounts of initial capital in
connection with the creation of new series and the voting of initial
shares of such series on matters requiring the approval of
shareholders. A potential source of the requisite initial capital is a
Portfolio's adviser or a Participating Insurance Company. Either of
these parties may have an interest in making the requisite capital
investments and in participating with an Insurance Fund in its
organization. Applicants note, however, that the provision of seed
capital or the purchase of shares in connection with the management of
an Insurance Fund by its investment adviser or by a Participating
Insurance Company may be deemed to violate the exclusivity requirement
of Rule 6e-2(b)(15) and/or Rule 6e-3(T)(b)(15).
18. Given the conditions of Treas. Reg. Section 1.817-5(f)(3) and
the harmony of interest between an Insurance Fund, on the one hand, and
an Adviser or a Participating Insurance Company, on the other,
Applicants assert that little incentive for overreaching exists.
Furthermore, Applicants assert such investment should not implicate the
concerns discussed above regarding the creation of material
irreconcilable conflicts. Instead, Applicants argue that permitting
investments by an Adviser, or by General Accounts, will permit the
orderly and efficient creation of an Insurance Fund, and reduce the
expense
[[Page 51873]]
and uncertainty of using outside parties at the early stages of the
Insurance Fund's operations.
Applicants' Conditions
Applicants agree that the order granting the requested relief shall
be subject to the following conditions:
1. A majority of the Board of Trustees (the ``Board'') of each
Insurance Fund will consist of persons who are not ``interested
persons'' of the Insurance Fund, as defined by section 2(a)(19) of the
1940 Act, and the rules thereunder, and as modified by any applicable
orders of the Commission, except that if this condition is not met by
reason of the death, disqualification, or bona-fide resignation of any
trustee or trustees, then the operation of this condition will be
suspended: (a) For a period of 90 days if the vacancy or vacancies may
be filled by the Board; (b) for a period of 150 days if a vote of
shareholders is required to fill the vacancy or vacancies; or (c) for
such longer period as the Commission may prescribe by order upon
application or by future rule.
2. The Board of each Insurance Fund will monitor the Insurance Fund
for the existence of any material irreconcilable conflict between the
interests of the contract owners of all Separate Accounts and
participants of all Qualified Plans investing in the Insurance Fund,
and determine what action, if any, should be taken in response to such
conflicts. A material irreconcilable conflict may arise for a variety
of reasons, including: (a) An action by any state insurance regulatory
authority; (b) a change in applicable federal or state insurance, tax,
or securities laws or regulations, or a public ruling, private letter
ruling, no-action or interpretative letter, or any similar action by
insurance, tax, or securities regulatory authorities; (c) an
administrative or judicial decision in any relevant proceeding; (d) the
manner in which the investments of the Insurance Fund are being
managed; (e) a difference in voting instructions given by variable
annuity contract owners, variable life insurance contract owners, and
trustees of the Qualified Plans; (f) a decision by a Participating
Insurance Company to disregard the voting instructions of contract
owners; or (g) if applicable, a decision by a Qualified Plan to
disregard the voting instructions of Qualified Plan participants.
3. Participating Insurance Companies (on their own behalf, as well
as by virtue of any investment of General Account assets in an
Insurance Fund), an Adviser, and any trustee on behalf of a Qualified
Plan that executes a Participation Agreement upon becoming an owner of
10 percent or more of the assets of an Insurance Fund (collectively,
``Participants'') will report any potential or existing conflicts to
the Board of the relevant Insurance Fund. Participants will be
responsible for assisting the Board in carrying out the Board's
responsibilities under these conditions by providing the Board with all
information reasonably necessary for the Board to consider any issues
raised. This responsibility includes, but is not limited to, an
obligation of each Participating Insurance Company to inform the Board
whenever contract owner voting instructions are disregarded, and, if
pass-through voting is applicable, an obligation by each Trustee for a
Qualified Plan to inform the Board whenever it has determined to
disregard Qualified Plan participant voting instructions. The
responsibility to report such information and conflicts, and to assist
the Board, will be a contractual obligation of all Participating
Insurance Companies under their Participation Agreements with the
relevant Insurance Fund, and these responsibilities will be carried out
with a view only to the interests of the contract owners. The
responsibility to report such information and conflicts, and to assist
the Board, also will be contractual obligations of all Qualified Plans
under their Participation Agreements, and such agreements will provide
that these responsibilities will be carried out with a view only to the
interests of Qualified Plan participants.
4. If it is determined by a majority of the Board of an Insurance
Fund, or a majority of the disinterested directors/trustees of such
Board, that a material irreconcilable conflict exists, then the
relevant Participant will, at its expense and to the extent reasonably
practicable (as determined by a majority of the disinterested
directors/trustees), take whatever steps are necessary to remedy or
eliminate the material irreconcilable conflict, up to and including:
(a) Withdrawing the assets allocable to some or all of the Separate
Accounts from the relevant Insurance Fund and reinvesting such assets
in a different investment vehicle including another Insurance Fund,
submitting the question as to whether such segregation should be
implemented to a vote of all affected contract or policy owners and, as
appropriate, segregating the assets of any appropriate group (i.e.,
variable annuity contract owners or variable life insurance contract
owners of one or more Participating Insurance Companies) that votes in
favor of such segregation, or offering to the affected contract owners
the option of making such a change; and (b) establishing a new
registered management investment company or managed separate account.
If a material irreconcilable conflict arises because of a decision by a
Participating Insurance Company to disregard contract or policy owner
voting instructions, and that decision represents a minority position
or would preclude a majority vote, then the Participating Insurance
Company may be required, at the election of the relevant Insurance
Fund, to withdraw such Participating Insurance Company's Separate
Account investment in the Insurance Fund, and no charge or penalty will
be imposed as a result of such withdrawal. The responsibility to take
remedial action in the event of a Board determination of a material
irreconcilable conflict and to bear the cost of such remedial action
will be a contractual obligation of all Participants under their
Participation Agreement with the relevant Insurance Fund, and these
responsibilities will be carried out with a view only to the interests
of contract owners and Qualified Plan participants. For purposes of
this Condition 4, a majority of the disinterested directors/ trustees
of the Board of each Insurance Fund will determine whether or not any
proposed action adequately remedies any material irreconcilable
conflict, but in no event will the Insurance Fund or an Adviser, as
relevant, be required to establish a new funding vehicle for any
Variable Contract. No Participating Insurance Company will be required
by this Condition 4 to establish a new funding vehicle for any Variable
Contract if any offer to do so has been declined by vote of a majority
of the contract or policy owners materially and adversely affected by
the material irreconcilable conflict. Further, no Qualified Plan will
be required by this Condition 4 to establish a new funding vehicle for
the Qualified Plan if: (a) A majority of the Qualified Plan
participants materially and adversely affected by the irreconcilable
material conflict vote to decline such offer; or (b) pursuant to
documents governing the Qualified Plan, the Qualified Plan makes such
decision without a Qualified Plan participant vote.
5. The Board of each Insurance Fund's determination of the
existence of a material irreconcilable conflict and its implications
will be made known in writing promptly to all Participants.
6. As to Variable Contracts issued by Separate Accounts registered
under the 1940 Act, Participating Insurance Companies will provide
pass-through voting privileges to all Variable Contract owners as
required by the 1940 Act as
[[Page 51874]]
interpreted by the Commission. However, as to Variable Contracts issued
by unregistered Separate Accounts, pass-through voting privileges will
be extended to contract owners to the extent granted by the issuing
insurance company. Accordingly, such Participants, where applicable,
will vote the Shares held in their Separate Accounts in a manner
consistent with voting instructions timely received from Variable
Contract owners. Participating Insurance Companies will be responsible
for assuring that each Separate Account investing in the relevant
Insurance Fund calculates voting privileges in a manner consistent with
other Participants. The obligation to calculate voting privileges as
provided in the Application will be a contractual obligation of all
Participating Insurance Companies under their Participation Agreement
with the relevant Insurance Fund. Each Participating Insurance Company
will vote shares for which it has not received timely voting
instructions, as well as shares held in its General Account or
otherwise attributed to it, in the same proportion as it votes those
shares for which it has received voting instructions. Each Qualified
Plan will vote as required by applicable law and governing Qualified
Plan documents.
7. As long as the 1940 Act requires pass-through voting privileges
to be provided to Variable Contract owners, an Adviser, who has
provided seed capital for the Insurance Fund, and any General Account
will vote their respective Shares in the same proportion as all
variable contract owners having voting rights with respect to that
Insurance Fund; provided, however, that an Adviser or any General
Account shall vote its Shares in such other manner as may be required
by the Commission or its staff.
8. Each Insurance Fund will comply with all provisions of the 1940
Act requiring voting by shareholders, which, for these purposes, shall
be the persons having a voting interest in the Shares, and, in
particular, the Insurance Fund will either provide for annual meetings
(except to the extent that the Commission may interpret section 16 of
the 1940 Act not to require such meetings) or comply with section 16(c)
of the 1940 Act (although each Insurance Fund is not, or will not be,
one of those trusts of the type described in section 16(c) of the 1940
Act), as well as with section 16(a) of the 1940 Act and, if and when
applicable, section 16(b) of the 1940 Act. Further, each Insurance Fund
will act in accordance with the Commission's interpretations of the
requirements of section 16(a) with respect to periodic elections of
directors/trustees and with whatever rules the Commission may
promulgate thereto.
9. An Insurance Fund will make its Shares available to the Separate
Accounts and Qualified Plans at or about the time it accepts any seed
capital from an Adviser or General Account of a Participating Insurance
Company.
10. Each Insurance Fund has notified, or will notify, all
Participants that Separate Account prospectus disclosure or Qualified
Plan prospectuses or other Qualified Plan disclosure documents
regarding potential risks of mixed and shared funding may be
appropriate. Each Insurance Fund will disclose, in its prospectus that:
(a) Shares of the Existing Funds may be offered to Separate Accounts
funding both variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance
policies and, if applicable, to Qualified Plans; (b) due to differences
in tax treatment and other considerations, the interests of various
contract owners participating in the Insurance Fund and the interests
of Qualified Plans investing in the Insurance Fund, if applicable, may
conflict; and (c) the Insurance Fund's Board will monitor events in
order to identify the existence of any material irreconcilable
conflicts and to determine what action, if any, should be taken in
response to any such conflict.
11. If and to the extent that Rule 6e-2 and Rule 6e-3(T) under the
1940 Act are amended, or proposed Rule 6e-3 under the 1940 Act is
adopted, to provide exemptive relief from any provision of the 1940
Act, or the rules promulgated thereunder, with respect to mixed or
shared funding, on terms and conditions materially different from any
exemptions granted in the order requested in the Application, then each
Insurance Fund and/or Participating Insurance Companies, as
appropriate, shall take such steps as may be necessary to comply with
Rules 6e-2 and 6e-3(T), or Rule 6e-3, as such rules are applicable.
12. Each Participant, at least annually, will submit to the Board
of Each Insurance Fund such reports, materials, or data as a Board
reasonably may request so that the directors/trustees of the Board may
fully carry out the obligations imposed upon the Board by the
conditions contained in the Application. Such reports, materials, and
data will be submitted more frequently if deemed appropriate by the
Board of an Insurance Fund. The obligations of the Participants to
provide these reports, materials, and data to the Board, when it so
reasonably requests, will be a contractual obligation of all
Participants under their Participation Agreements with the relevant
Insurance Fund.
13. All reports of potential or existing conflicts received by the
Board of each Insurance Fund, and all Board action with regard to
determining the existence of a conflict, notifying Participants of a
conflict and determining whether any proposed action adequately
remedies a conflict, will be properly recorded in the minutes of the
Board or other appropriate records, and such minutes or other records
shall be made available to the Commission upon request.
14. Each Insurance Fund will not accept a purchase order from a
Qualified Plan if such purchase would make the Qualified Plan an owner
of 10 percent or more of the assets of the Insurance Fund unless the
Trustee for such Qualified Plan executes an agreement with the
Insurance Fund governing participation in the Insurance Fund that
includes the conditions set forth herein to the extent applicable. A
Trustee for a Qualified Plan will execute an application containing an
acknowledgement of this condition at the time of its initial purchase
of Shares.
Conclusions
Applicants submit that, for the reasons summarized above and to the
extent necessary or appropriate to provide for the transactions
described herein, the requested exemptions from sections 9(a), 13(a),
15(a), and 15(b) of the 1940 Act and Rules 6e-2(b)(15) and 6e-
3(T)(b)(15) thereunder, in accordance with the standards of section
6(c) of the 1940 Act, are in the public interest and consistent with
the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the
policy and provisions of the 1940 Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-17786 Filed 9-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P