Initiation of Five-year (“Sunset”) Reviews, 50659-50661 [E7-17455]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 4, 2007 / Notices
review of entries covered by an order,
finding, or suspended investigation
listed in this notice and for the period
identified above, the Department will
instruct the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection to assess antidumping or
countervailing duties on those entries at
a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or
bond for) estimated antidumping or
countervailing duties required on those
entries at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption and to continue to collect
the cash deposit previously ordered.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Dated: August 23, 2007.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–17463 Filed 8–31–07; 8:45 am]
review to determine whether revocation
of a countervailing or antidumping duty
order or termination of an investigation
suspended under section 704 or 734
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping or a
countervailable subsidy (as the case may
be) and of material injury.
Every five years, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, the Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) and the
International Trade Commission
automatically initiate and conduct a
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Advance Notification of
Sunset Reviews
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Upcoming Sunset
Reviews.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Upcoming Sunset Reviews for October
2007
The following Sunset Reviews are
scheduled for initiation in October 2007
and will appear in that month’s Notice
of Initiation of Five-year Sunset
Reviews.
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Department Contact
Sulfanilic Acid from Hungary (A–437–804) .....................................................................................................
Sulfanilic Acid from Portugal (A–471–806) .....................................................................................................
Countervailing Duty Proceedings.
Sulfanilic Acid from Hungary (C–437–805) .....................................................................................................
Suspended Investigations.
No Sunset Reviews of suspended investigations are scheduled for initiation in October 2007..
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
50659
The Department’s procedures for the
conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on
methodological or analytical issues
relevant to the Department’s conduct of
Sunset Reviews is set forth in the
Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3-Policies Regarding the Conduct of Fiveyear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871
(April 16, 1998) . The Notice of
Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Reviews provides further information
regarding what is required of all parties
to participate in Sunset Reviews.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the
Department will maintain and make
available a service list for these
proceedings. To facilitate the timely
preparation of the service list(s), it is
requested that those seeking recognition
as interested parties to a proceeding
contact the Department in writing
within 15 days of the publication of the
Notice of Initition.
Please note that if the Department
receives a Notice of Intent to Participate
from a member of the domestic industry
within 15 days of the date of initiation,
the review will continue. Thereafter,
any interested party wishing to
participate in the Sunset Review must
provide substantive comments in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:41 Aug 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
response to the notice of initiation no
later than 30 days after the date of
initiation.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Brandon Farlander (202) 482–0182
Brandon Farlander (202) 482–0182
Brandon Farlander (202) 482–0182
its notice of Institution of Five-year
Review which covers the same orders.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
September 4, 2007.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
The
Department official identified in the
Initiation of Review(s) section below at
AD/CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th & Constitution Ave.,
NW, Washington, DC 20230. For
information from the Commission
contact Mary Messer, Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission at (202) 205–3193.
International Trade Administration
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: August 23, 2007.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–17442 Filed 8–31–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Reviews
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is
automatically initiating a five-year
(‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the antidumping
and countervailing duty orders listed
below. The International Trade
Commission (‘‘the Commission’’) is
publishing concurrently with this notice
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
The Department’s procedures for the
conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
in its Procedures for Conducting Fiveyear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998)
and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005).
Guidance on methodological or
analytical issues relevant to the
Department’s conduct of Sunset
Reviews is set forth in the Department’s
Policy Bulletin 98.3 - Policies Regarding
the Conduct of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Reviews of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy
E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM
04SEN1
50660
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 4, 2007 / Notices
Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998)
(‘‘Sunset Policy Bulletin’’).
Initiation of Reviews
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset
DOC Case No.
ITC Case No.
Country
A–351–832 .....................................................
731–TA–953
Brazil
A–122–840 .....................................................
731–TA–954
Canada
A–560–815 .....................................................
731–TA–957
Indonesia
A–201–830 .....................................................
731–TA–958
Mexico
A–841–805 .....................................................
731–TA–959
Moldova
A–274–804 .....................................................
731–TA–961
A–823–812 .....................................................
731–TA–962
Trinidad &
Tobago
Ukraine
C–351–833 ....................................................
701–TA–417
Brazil
Review of the following antidumping
and countervailing duty orders:
Product
Department Contact
Carbon and Certain
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
Carbon and Certain
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
Carbon and Certain
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
Carbon and Certain
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
Carbon and Certain
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
Carbon and Certain
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
Carbon and Certain
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
Carbon and Certain
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
Brandon Farlander (202) 482–0182
Brandon Farlander (202) 482–0182
Brandon Farlander (202) 482–0182
Brandon Farlander (202) 482–0182
Brandon Farlander (202) 482–0182
Brandon Farlander (202) 482–0182
Brandon Farlander (202) 482–0182
Brandon Farlander (202) 482–0182
Suspended Investigations.
No Sunset Reviews of suspended investigations are scheduled for initiation in September 2007..
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Filing Information
As a courtesy, we are making
information related to Sunset
proceedings, including copies of the
pertinent statute and Department’s
regulations, the Department’s schedule
for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past
revocations and continuations, and
current service lists, available to the
public on the Department’s sunset
Internet Web site at the following
address: ‘‘https://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/.’’
All submissions in these Sunset
Reviews must be filed in accordance
with the Department’s regulations
regarding format, translation, service,
and certification of documents. These
rules can be found at 19 CFR 351.303.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the
Department will maintain and make
available a service list for these
proceedings. To facilitate the timely
preparation of the service list(s), it is
requested that those seeking recognition
as interested parties to a proceeding
contact the Department in writing
within 10 days of the publication of the
Notice of Initiation.
Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews
can be very short, we urge interested
parties to apply for access to proprietary
information under administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) immediately
following publication in the Federal
Register of the notice of initiation of the
sunset review. The Department’s
regulations on submission of proprietary
information and eligibility to receive
access to business proprietary
information under APO can be found at
19 CFR 351.304–306.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Aug 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
Information Required from Interested
Parties
Domestic interested parties (defined
in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b))
wishing to participate in these Sunset
Reviews must respond not later than 15
days after the date of publication in the
Federal Register of this notice of
initiation by filing a notice of intent to
participate. The required contents of the
notice of intent to participate are set
forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In
accordance with the Department’s
regulations, if we do not receive a notice
of intent to participate from at least one
domestic interested party by the 15-day
deadline, the Department will
automatically revoke the orders without
further review. See 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(iii).
For sunset reviews of countervailing
duty orders, parties wishing the
Department to consider arguments that
countervailable subsidy programs have
been terminated must include with their
substantive responses information and
documentation addressing whether the
changes to the program were (1) limited
to an individual firm or firms and (2)
effected by an official act of the
government. Further, a party claiming
program termination is expected to
document that there are no residual
benefits under the program and that
substitute programs have not been
introduced. Cf. 19 CFR 351.526(b) and
(d). If a party maintains that any of the
subsidies countervailed by the
Department were not conferred
pursuant to a subsidy program, that
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
party should nevertheless address the
applicability of the factors set forth in
19 CFR 351.526(b) and (d). Similarly,
parties wishing the Department to
consider whether a company’s change
in ownership has extinguished the
benefit from prior non–recurring,
allocable, subsidies must include with
their substantive responses information
and documentation supporting their
claim that all or almost all of the
company’s shares or assets were sold in
an arm’s length transaction, at a price
representing fair market value, as
described in the Notice of Final
Modification of Agency Practice Under
Section 123 of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act, 68 FR 37125 (June 23,
2003) (‘‘Modification Notice’’). See
Modification Notice for a discussion of
the types of information and
documentation the Department requires.
If we receive an order–specific notice
of intent to participate from a domestic
interested party, the Department’s
regulations provide that all parties
wishing to participate in the Sunset
Review must file complete substantive
responses not later than 30 days after
the date of publication in the Federal
Register of this notice of initiation. The
required contents of a substantive
response, on an order–specific basis, are
set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note
that certain information requirements
differ for respondent and domestic
parties. Also, note that the Department’s
information requirements are distinct
from the Commission’s information
requirements. Please consult the
Department’s regulations for
information regarding the Department’s
E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM
04SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 4, 2007 / Notices
conduct of Sunset Reviews.1 Please
consult the Department’s regulations at
19 CFR Part 351 for definitions of terms
and for other general information
concerning antidumping and
countervailing duty proceedings at the
Department.
This notice of initiation is being
published in accordance with section
751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c).
Dated: August 23, 2007.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–17455 Filed 8–31–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–357–812]
Honey from Argentina: Notice of
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results and Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is rescinding in part
the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on honey from
Argentina for the period December 1,
2005, to November 30, 2006 with
respect to Mielar S.A. (Mielar)/
Compania Apicola Argentina (CAA).1
This partial rescission is based on the
withdrawal of the requests for review by
the interested parties that requested the
review. Additionally, the Department is
extending the preliminary results of this
administrative review to no later than
December 20, 2007.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 4, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Scott or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
1 In comments made on the interim final sunset
regulations, a number of parties stated that the
proposed five-day period for rebuttals to
substantive responses to a notice of initiation was
insufficient. This requirement was retained in the
final sunset regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As
provided in 19 CFR 351.302(b), however, the
Department will consider individual requests for
extension of that five-day deadline based upon a
showing of good cause.
1 Petitioners requested that the Department
review Mielar and CAA as separate entities.
However, in a previous segment of this proceeding,
the Department treated these two companies as a
single entity, and no new evidence has been
presented in this segment of the proceeding to
warrant changing this treatment.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:41 Aug 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–2657 and (202)
482–0649, respectively.
BACKGROUND: On December 1, 2006, the
Department published a notice of
opportunity to request an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on, inter alia, honey from Argentina.
See Antidumping or Countervailing
Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 71 FR 69543
(December 1, 2006). In response, the
American Honey Producers Association
and the Sioux Honey Association
(collectively, petitioners) timely
requested an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on honey
from Argentina for the December 1,
2005, through November 30, 2006
period of review (POR). The petitioners
requested that the Department conduct
an administrative review of entries of
subject merchandise made by nine
Argentine producers/exporters. In
addition, the Department received
timely requests for review from six
Argentine exporters included in the
petitioners’ request and one timely
request from a producer/exporter that
was not included in petitioners’
requests for review.
On February 2, 2007, the Department
initiated a review on the ten companies2
for which an administrative review was
requested. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 72 FR 5005
(February 2, 2007). On March 27, 2007,
the Department indicated that it was
selecting for review the four producers/
exporters with the largest export volume
during the POR: Asociacion de
Cooperativas Argentinas (ACA), Mielar/
CAA, Nexco S.A. (Nexco), and Seylinco,
S.A. (Seylinco). See the memorandum,
‘‘Selection of Respondents’’ to Stephen
J. Claeys, dated March 27, 2007
(Selection Memorandum). Based on the
timely withdrawal of requests for review
from the requesting parties, on June 19,
2007, the Department rescinded this
review with respect to four companies,
one of which was Nexco. See Honey
from Argentina: Notice of Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 72 FR 33740
(June 19, 2007).
On July 17, 2007, petitioners and
respondent company Mielar/CAA
withdrew their requests for review. See
2 The Federal Register notice lists 11 companies;
however, as explained in the previous footnote, we
are treating Mielar and CAA as a single entity based
on our treatment of these two entities in a previous
segment of this proceeding.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50661
Letters from petitioners and from
Mielar/CAA to the Department, dated
July 17, 2007, on file in the Central
Records Unit (CRU), room B–099 of the
main Department building.
Rescission, in Part, of Administrative
Review
The applicable regulation, 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), states that if a party that
requested an administrative review
withdraws the request within 90 days of
the publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review, the
Secretary will rescind the review in
whole or in part. Furthermore, the
regulation states the Secretary may
extend this time limit if the Secretary
decides that it is reasonable to do so.
Although both petitioners and Mielar/
CAA withdrew their requests for review
after the 90-day deadline, the
Department finds it reasonable to extend
the withdrawal deadline because the
Department has not yet devoted
significant time or resources to this
review, e.g., the Department has not yet
conducted a sales–below cost
investigation. As such, based on prior
practice, the Department determines it
is reasonable to extend the time limit in
this case and rescind the review with
respect to Mielar/CAA. See, e.g., Honey
from Argentina: Notice of Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 71 FR 61018
(October 17, 2006). The Department will
issue appropriate assessment
instructions for Mielar/CAA directly to
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) within 15 days of the publication
of this notice. The Department will
direct CBP to assess antidumping duties
for Mielar/CAA at the cash deposit rates
in effect on the date of entry for entries
during the period December 1, 2005,
through November 30, 2006.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Tariff Act),
requires the Department to complete the
preliminary results of an administrative
review within 245 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of an order for
which a review is requested. However,
if it is not practicable to complete the
review within this time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act allows the
Department to extend the time limit for
the preliminary results to a maximum of
365 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of an order for which
a review is requested.
The Department has determined it is
not practicable to complete this review
within the statutory time limit because
we require additional time to conduct
E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM
04SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50659-50661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-17455]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (``the Act''), the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') is automatically initiating a five-year (``Sunset
Review'') of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders listed
below. The International Trade Commission (``the Commission'') is
publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of
Five-year Review which covers the same orders.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 4, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Department official identified in
the Initiation of Review(s) section below at AD/CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th & Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20230. For
information from the Commission contact Mary Messer, Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205-3193.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department's procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are
set forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five-year (``Sunset'')
Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516
(March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on
methodological or analytical issues relevant to the Department's
conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in the Department's Policy
Bulletin 98.3 - Policies Regarding the Conduct of Five-year
(``Sunset'') Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders;
Policy
[[Page 50660]]
Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998) (``Sunset Policy Bulletin'').
Initiation of Reviews
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset
Review of the following antidumping and countervailing duty orders:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOC Case No. ITC Case No. Country Product Department Contact
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-351-832.................................................... 731-TA-953 Brazil Carbon and Certain Brandon Farlander (202) 482-0182
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
A-122-840.................................................... 731-TA-954 Canada Carbon and Certain Brandon Farlander (202) 482-0182
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
A-560-815.................................................... 731-TA-957 Indonesia Carbon and Certain Brandon Farlander (202) 482-0182
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
A-201-830.................................................... 731-TA-958 Mexico Carbon and Certain Brandon Farlander (202) 482-0182
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
A-841-805.................................................... 731-TA-959 Moldova Carbon and Certain Brandon Farlander (202) 482-0182
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
A-274-804.................................................... 731-TA-961 Trinidad & Carbon and Certain Brandon Farlander (202) 482-0182
Tobago Alloy Steel Wire Rod
A-823-812.................................................... 731-TA-962 Ukraine Carbon and Certain Brandon Farlander (202) 482-0182
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
C-351-833.................................................... 701-TA-417 Brazil Carbon and Certain Brandon Farlander (202) 482-0182
Alloy Steel Wire Rod
Suspended Investigations.............................
No Sunset Reviews of suspended investigations are scheduled
for initiation in September 2007............................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filing Information
As a courtesy, we are making information related to Sunset
proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Department's
regulations, the Department's schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of
past revocations and continuations, and current service lists,
available to the public on the Department's sunset Internet Web site at
the following address: ``https://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/.'' All
submissions in these Sunset Reviews must be filed in accordance with
the Department's regulations regarding format, translation, service,
and certification of documents. These rules can be found at 19 CFR
351.303.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the Department will maintain and
make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the
timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those
seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact the
Department in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice
of Initiation.
Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge
interested parties to apply for access to proprietary information under
administrative protective order (``APO'') immediately following
publication in the Federal Register of the notice of initiation of the
sunset review. The Department's regulations on submission of
proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business
proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304-306.
Information Required from Interested Parties
Domestic interested parties (defined in section 771(9)(C), (D),
(E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)) wishing to
participate in these Sunset Reviews must respond not later than 15 days
after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of
initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required
contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the Department's regulations, if
we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one
domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, the Department will
automatically revoke the orders without further review. See 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(iii).
For sunset reviews of countervailing duty orders, parties wishing
the Department to consider arguments that countervailable subsidy
programs have been terminated must include with their substantive
responses information and documentation addressing whether the changes
to the program were (1) limited to an individual firm or firms and (2)
effected by an official act of the government. Further, a party
claiming program termination is expected to document that there are no
residual benefits under the program and that substitute programs have
not been introduced. Cf. 19 CFR 351.526(b) and (d). If a party
maintains that any of the subsidies countervailed by the Department
were not conferred pursuant to a subsidy program, that party should
nevertheless address the applicability of the factors set forth in 19
CFR 351.526(b) and (d). Similarly, parties wishing the Department to
consider whether a company's change in ownership has extinguished the
benefit from prior non-recurring, allocable, subsidies must include
with their substantive responses information and documentation
supporting their claim that all or almost all of the company's shares
or assets were sold in an arm's length transaction, at a price
representing fair market value, as described in the Notice of Final
Modification of Agency Practice Under Section 123 of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act, 68 FR 37125 (June 23, 2003) (``Modification Notice'').
See Modification Notice for a discussion of the types of information
and documentation the Department requires.
If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate
from a domestic interested party, the Department's regulations provide
that all parties wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must file
complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of
publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The
required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific
basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain
information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties.
Also, note that the Department's information requirements are distinct
from the Commission's information requirements. Please consult the
Department's regulations for information regarding the Department's
[[Page 50661]]
conduct of Sunset Reviews.\1\ Please consult the Department's
regulations at 19 CFR Part 351 for definitions of terms and for other
general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty
proceedings at the Department.
This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with
section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In comments made on the interim final sunset regulations, a
number of parties stated that the proposed five-day period for
rebuttals to substantive responses to a notice of initiation was
insufficient. This requirement was retained in the final sunset
regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As provided in 19 CFR
351.302(b), however, the Department will consider individual
requests for extension of that five-day deadline based upon a
showing of good cause.
Dated: August 23, 2007.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-17455 Filed 8-31-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
