Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 50696-50699 [E7-17229]
Download as PDF
50696
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 4, 2007 / Notices
recommendations on project necessity
and validity. (3) Make recommendations
regarding allocation of research funds
through review of research and project
proposals as well as needs identified
through the evaluation process above.
(4) Could be consulted on issues such as
protocols for specific projects.
Topics to be presented and discussed
by the GSENMAC include: Elections for
GSENMAC Chair and Vice Chair;
Management updates to the GSENMAC;
Sub-committee reports (Rangeland
Health, Science, and Marketing/
Partnerships/Revenue); vegetation
restoration and fuels reduction on
Buckskin Mountain.
Members of the public are welcome to
address the council from 5 p.m. to 6
p.m., local time on September 19, 2007,
in Kanab, Utah, at the GSENM Visitor
Center. Depending on the number of
persons wishing to speak, a time limit
could be established. Interested persons
may make oral statements to the
GSENMAC during this time or written
statements may be submitted for the
GSENMAC’s consideration. Written
statements can be sent to: Grand
Staircase-Escalante National Monument,
Attn.: Larry Crutchfield, 190 E. Center
Street, Kanab, UT 84741. Information to
be distributed to the GSENMAC is
requested 10 days prior to the start of
the GSENMAC meeting.
All meetings, including the site
orientation, are open to the public;
however, transportation, lodging, and
meals are the responsibility of the
participating public.
Dated: August 26, 2007.
Larry E Crutchfield,
Acting Monument Manager, Grand StaircaseEscalante National Monument.
[FR Doc. E7–17292 Filed 8–31–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–$$–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[ID–410–1610–DR–006D]
Notice of Availability of the Record of
Decision for the Coeur d’Alene
Resource Management Plan (RMP)/
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Bureau of Land Management
(BLM), Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of Record
of Decision (ROD).
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act (FLPMA), and BLM
Policy, the BLM announces the
availability of the RMP/ROD for the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:33 Aug 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
Coeur d’Alene Field Office located in
Idaho. The Idaho State Director signed
the ROD on June 29, 2007, and it is
effective as of that date.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Coeur d’Alene
ROD/RMP are available upon request
from the Coeur d’Alene Field Office,
Bureau of Land Management, ATTN:
RMP, 3815 Schreiber Way, Coeur
d’Alene, ID 83815, or via the internet at
https://www.blm.gov/rmp/id/cda/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Pavey, Spokane District Office,
1103 North Fancher, Spokane Valley,
Washington 99212, (208) 769–5059, or
e-mail scott_pavey@blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coeur
d’Alene RMP was developed with broad
public participation through a three year
collaborative planning process. This
RMP addresses management on
approximately 97,900 acres of public
land in the planning area. The Coeur
d’Alene RMP is designed to achieve or
maintain desired future conditions
developed through the planning
process. It includes a series of
management actions to meet the desired
resource conditions for forest, upland,
and riparian vegetation; wildlife
habitats; cultural and visual resources;
and recreation. The approved Coeur
d’Alene RMP is essentially the same as
Alternative D in the Proposed RMP/
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(PRMP/FEIS), published in October
2006.
The BLM received two protests to the
PRMP/FEIS which the Director of BLM
resolved without requiring significant
changes to proposed decisions in the
PRMP/FEIS. No inconsistencies with
State or local plans, policies, or
programs were identified during the
Governor’s consistency review of the
PRMP/FEIS. Thus, as a result of the lack
of substantive comments in the protest
and consistency review stages, only
minor editorial modifications were
made in preparing the ROD/RMP. These
modifications corrected errors that were
noted during review of the PRMP/FEIS
and provide further clarification for
some of the decisions.
The RMP includes decisions
identifying designated routes of travel
for motorized vehicles, which are
implementation level decisions and are
therefore appealable under 43 CFR Part
4. These decisions (route
identifications) are displayed on travel
management maps in the ROD/RMP.
Any party adversely affected by these
route identifications may appeal within
30 days of publication of this Notice of
Availability, pursuant to 43 CFR part 4,
subpart E. The appeal should identify
the specific route(s) by township, range,
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and section on which the decision is
being appealed. Please consult the
appropriate regulations (43 CFR part 4,
subpart E) for further appeal
requirements. The appeal must be filed
with the Field Manager of the Coeur
d’Alene Field Office at the above listed
address.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
appeal, you should be aware that your
entire appeal—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your appeal to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Thomas H. Dyer,
Bureau of Land Management, Idaho State
Director.
[FR Doc. E7–17417 Filed 8–31–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–417 and 731–
TA–953, 954, 957–959, 961, and 962
(Review)]
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
Rod From Brazil, Canada, Indonesia,
Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and
Tobago, and Ukraine
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of five-year reviews
concerning the countervailing duty
order on carbon and certain alloy steel
wire rod (‘‘wire rod’’) from Brazil and
antidumping duty orders on wire rod
from Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico,
Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and
Ukraine.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted reviews
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act)
to determine whether revocation of the
countervailing duty order on wire rod
from Brazil and the antidumping duty
orders on wire rod from Brazil, Canada,
Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad
and Tobago, and Ukraine would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury. Pursuant
to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested
parties are requested to respond to this
notice by submitting the information
specified below to the Commission; 1 to
1 No response to this request for information is
required if a currently valid Office of Management
E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM
04SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 4, 2007 / Notices
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
be assured of consideration, the
deadline for responses is October 24,
2007. Comments on the adequacy of
responses may be filed with the
Commission by November 20, 2007. For
further information concerning the
conduct of these reviews and rules of
general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 4, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On October 22, 2002, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’)
issued a countervailing duty order on
imports of wire rod from Brazil (67 FR
64871).2 On October 29, 2002,
Commerce issued antidumping duty
orders on imports of wire rod from
Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico,
Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and
Ukraine (67 FR 65944–65947). The
Commission is conducting reviews to
determine whether revocation of the
orders would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to the domestic industry within
a reasonably foreseeable time. It will
assess the adequacy of interested party
responses to this notice of institution to
determine whether to conduct full
reviews or expedited reviews. The
Commission’s determinations in any
and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 08–5–173,
expiration date June 30, 2008. Public reporting
burden for the request is estimated to average 10
hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to
the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436.
2 A countervailing duty order on imports of wire
rod from Canada was also issued by Commerce in
the same notice; however, that order was
subsequently revoked by Commerce (69 FR 3330,
January 23, 2004).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Aug 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
expedited reviews will be based on the
facts available, which may include
information provided in response to this
notice.
Definitions. The following definitions
apply to these reviews:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
scope of the five-year reviews, as
defined by Commerce.
(2) The Subject Countries in these
reviews are Brazil, Canada, Indonesia,
Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago,
and Ukraine.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the
Subject Merchandise. In its original
determinations, the Commission found
a single Domestic Like Product
consisting of: (1) All carbon and certain
alloy steel wire rod included within
Commerce’s scope, and (2) the grade
1080 tire bead and grade 1080 tire cord
quality wire rod that had been excluded
from Commerce’s scope. One
Commissioner defined the Domestic
Like Product differently.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S.
producers as a whole of the Domestic
Like Product, or those producers whose
collective output of the Domestic Like
Product constitutes a major proportion
of the total domestic production of the
product. In its original determinations,
the Commission found a single
Domestic Industry consisting of all U.S.
producers of the Domestic Like Product
which, as stated above, consists of all
wire rod corresponding to Commerce’s
scope as well as the certain grade 1080
tire cord and grade 1080 tire bead wire
rod products that Commerce had
excluded from the scope. One
Commissioner defined the Domestic
Industry differently.
(5) The Order Dates are the dates that
the antidumping and countervailing
duty orders under review became
effective. In these reviews, the Order
Date concerning the countervailing duty
order on imports of wire rod from Brazil
is October 22, 2002, and the Order Date
concerning the antidumping duty orders
on imports of wire rod from Brazil,
Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova,
Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine is
October 29, 2002.
(6) An Importer is any person or firm
engaged, either directly or through a
parent company or subsidiary, in
importing the Subject Merchandise into
the United States from a foreign
manufacturer or through its selling
agent.
Participation in the reviews and
public service list. Persons, including
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50697
industrial users of the Subject
Merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in the reviews as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in § 201.11(b)(4) of the
Commission’s rules, no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. The Secretary will
maintain a public service list containing
the names and addresses of all persons,
or their representatives, who are parties
to the reviews.
Former Commission employees who
are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are reminded that they
are required, pursuant to 19 CFR 201.15,
to seek Commission approval if the
matter in which they are seeking to
appear was pending in any manner or
form during their Commission
employment. The Commission’s
designated agency ethics official has
advised that a five-year review is the
‘‘same particular matter’’ as the
underlying original investigation for
purposes of 19 CFR 201.15 and 18
U.S.C. 207, the post employment statute
for Federal employees. Former
employees may seek informal advice
from Commission ethics officials with
respect to this and the related issue of
whether the employee’s participation
was ‘‘personal and substantial.’’
However, any informal consultation will
not relieve former employees of the
obligation to seek approval to appear
from the Commission under its rule
201.15. For ethics advice, contact Carol
McCue Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics
Official, at 202–205–3088.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and APO service list. Pursuant to
§ 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the
Secretary will make BPI submitted in
these reviews available to authorized
applicants under the APO issued in the
reviews, provided that the application is
made no later than 21 days after
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. Authorized applicants must
represent interested parties, as defined
in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to
the reviews. A separate service list will
be maintained by the Secretary for those
parties authorized to receive BPI under
the APO.
Certification. Pursuant to § 207.3 of
the Commission’s rules, any person
submitting information to the
Commission in connection with these
reviews must certify that the
information is accurate and complete to
the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter
E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM
04SEN1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
50698
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 4, 2007 / Notices
will be deemed to consent, unless
otherwise specified, for the
Commission, its employees, and
contract personnel to use the
information provided in any other
reviews or investigations of the same or
comparable products which the
Commission conducts under Title VII of
the Act, or in internal audits and
investigations relating to the programs
and operations of the Commission
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions. Pursuant to
§ 207.61 of the Commission’s rules, each
interested party response to this notice
must provide the information specified
below. The deadline for filing such
responses is October 24, 2007. Pursuant
to § 207.62(b) of the Commission’s rules,
eligible parties (as specified in
Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also
file comments concerning the adequacy
of responses to the notice of institution
and whether the Commission should
conduct expedited or full reviews. The
deadline for filing such comments is
November 20, 2007. All written
submissions must conform with the
provisions of §§ 201.8 and 207.3 of the
Commission’s rules and any
submissions that contain BPI must also
conform with the requirements of
§§ 201.6 and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means, except to the extent permitted by
§ 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, as
amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8,
2002). Also, in accordance with
§§ 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the
Commission’s rules, each document
filed by a party to the reviews must be
served on all other parties to the reviews
(as identified by either the public or
APO service list as appropriate), and a
certificate of service must accompany
the document (if you are not a party to
the reviews you do not need to serve
your response).
Inability to provide requested
information. Pursuant to § 207.61(c) of
the Commission’s rules, any interested
party that cannot furnish the
information requested by this notice in
the requested form and manner shall
notify the Commission at the earliest
possible time, provide a full explanation
of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative
forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested
party does not provide this notification
(or the Commission finds the
explanation provided in the notification
inadequate) and fails to provide a
complete response to this notice, the
Commission may take an adverse
inference against the party pursuant to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Aug 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
section 776(b) of the Act in making its
determinations in the reviews.
Information to be Provided in
Response to this Notice of Institution: If
you are a domestic producer, union/
worker group, or trade/business
association; import/export Subject
Merchandise from more than one
Subject Country; or produce Subject
Merchandise in more than one Subject
Country, you may file a single response.
If you do so, please ensure that your
response to each question includes the
information requested for each pertinent
Subject Country. As used below, the
term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm
or entity (including World Wide Web
address if available) and name,
telephone number, fax number, and email address of the certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of
the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union
or worker group, a U.S. importer of the
Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer
or exporter of the Subject Merchandise,
a U.S. or foreign trade or business
association, or another interested party
(including an explanation). If you are a
union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which
your workers are employed or which are
members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is willing to participate
in these reviews by providing
information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of
the revocation of the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders on the
Domestic Industry in general and/or
your firm/entity specifically. In your
response, please discuss the various
factors specified in section 752(a) of the
Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the
likely volume of subject imports, likely
price effects of subject imports, and
likely impact of imports of Subject
Merchandise on the Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. producers of the
Domestic Like Product. Identify any
known related parties and the nature of
the relationship as defined in section
771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C
1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. importers of the Subject
Merchandise and producers of the
Subject Merchandise in each Subject
Country that currently export or have
exported Subject Merchandise to the
United States or other countries since
the Order Date.
(7) If you are a U.S. producer of the
Domestic Like Product, provide the
following information on your firm’s
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
operations on that product during
calendar year 2006 (report quantity data
in short tons and value data in U.S.
dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/
worker group or trade/business
association, provide the information, on
an aggregate basis, for the firms in
which your workers are employed/
which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total U.S. production of the Domestic
Like Product accounted for by your
firm’s(s’) production;
(b) The quantity and value of U.S.
commercial shipments of the Domestic
Like Product produced in your U.S.
plant(s); and
(c) The quantity and value of U.S.
internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s).
(8) If you are a U.S. importer or a
trade/business association of U.S.
importers of the Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country(ies), provide
the following information on your
firm’s(s’) operations on that product
during calendar year 2006 (report
quantity data in short tons and value
data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for
the firms which are members of your
association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed,
duty-paid but not including
antidumping or countervailing duties)
of U.S. imports and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total U.S.
imports of Subject Merchandise from
each Subject Country accounted for by
your firm’s(s’) imports;
(b) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping and/or
countervailing duties) of U.S.
commercial shipments of Subject
Merchandise imported from each
Subject Country; and
(c) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping and/or
countervailing duties) of U.S. internal
consumption/company transfers of
Subject Merchandise imported from
each Subject Country.
(9) If you are a producer, an exporter,
or a trade/business association of
producers or exporters of the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject
Country(ies), provide the following
information on your firm’s(s’)
operations on that product during
calendar year 2006 (report quantity data
in short tons and value data in U.S.
dollars, landed and duty-paid at the
U.S. port but not including antidumping
or countervailing duties). If you are a
trade/business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for
E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM
04SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 4, 2007 / Notices
the firms which are members of your
association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total production of Subject Merchandise
in each Subject Country accounted for
by your firm’s(s’) production; and
(b) The quantity and value of your
firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of
Subject Merchandise and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total
exports to the United States of Subject
Merchandise from each Subject Country
accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports.
(10) Identify significant changes, if
any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the
Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the
market for the Subject Merchandise in
the Subject Countries since the Order
Dates, and significant changes, if any,
that are likely to occur within a
reasonably foreseeable time. Supply
conditions to consider include
technology; production methods;
development efforts; ability to increase
production (including the shift of
production facilities used for other
products and the use, cost, or
availability of major inputs into
production); and factors related to the
ability to shift supply among different
national markets (including barriers to
importation in foreign markets or
changes in market demand abroad).
Demand conditions to consider include
end uses and applications; the existence
and availability of substitute products;
and the level of competition among the
Domestic Like Product produced in the
United States, Subject Merchandise
produced in the Subject Countries, and
such merchandise from other countries.
(11) (OPTIONAL) A statement of
whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product
and Domestic Industry; if you disagree
with either or both of these definitions,
please explain why and provide
alternative definitions.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s
rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 27, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–17229 Filed 8–31–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 Aug 31, 2007
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–448 and 731–
TA–1117 (Preliminary)]
Certain Off-the-Road Tires From China
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigations, the United
States International Trade Commission
(Commission) determines, pursuant to
sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a) and
1673b(a)) (the Act), that there is a
reasonable indication that an industry
in the United States is materially
injured, by reason of imports from
China of certain off-the-road tires,
provided for in subheadings 4011.20.10,
4011.20.50, 4011.61.00, 4011.62.00,
4011.63.00, 4011.69.00, 4011.92.00,
4011.93.40, 4011.93.80, 4011.94.40, and
4011.94.80 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States, that are
alleged to be sold in the United States
at less than fair value (LTFV) and
subsidized by the Government of China.
Commencement of Final Phase
Investigations
Pursuant to § 207.18 of the
Commission’s rules, the Commission
also gives notice of the commencement
of the final phase of its investigations.
The Commission will issue a final phase
notice of scheduling, which will be
published in the Federal Register as
provided in section 207.21 of the
Commission’s rules, upon notice from
the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) of affirmative preliminary
determinations in these investigations
under sections 703(b) and 733(b) of the
Act, or, if the preliminary
determinations are negative, upon
notice of affirmative final
determinations in those investigations
under sections 705(a) and 735(a) of the
Act. Parties that filed entries of
appearance in the preliminary phase of
the investigations need not enter a
separate appearance for the final phase
of the investigations. Industrial users,
and, if the merchandise under
investigation is sold at the retail level,
representative consumer organizations
have the right to appear as parties in
Commission antidumping and
countervailing duty investigations. The
Secretary will prepare a public service
list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives,
who are parties to the investigations.
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50699
Background
On June 18, 2007, a petition was filed
with the Commission and Commerce by
Titan Tire Corporation, Des Moines, IA,
and The United Steel, Paper and
Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing,
Energy, Allied Industrial and Service
Workers International Union, AFL–CIO–
CLC, Pittsburgh, PA., alleging that an
industry in the United States is
materially injured or threatened with
material injury by reason of subsidized
and LTFV imports of certain off-theroad tires from China. Accordingly,
effective June 18, 2007, the Commission
instituted countervailing duty and
antidumping investigation Nos. 701–
TA–448 and 731–TA–1117
(Preliminary).
Notice of the institution of the
Commission’s investigations and of a
public conference to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register of June 22, 2007 (72 FR
34478). The conference was held in
Washington, DC, on July 9, 2007, and all
persons who requested the opportunity
were permitted to appear in person or
by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these investigations to
the Secretary of Commerce on August
27, 2007. The views of the Commission
are contained in USITC Publication
3943 (August 2007), entitled Certain
Off-the-Road Tires From China:
Investigation Nos. 701–TA–448 and
731–TA–1117 (Preliminary).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 27, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–17235 Filed 8–31–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Review:
Comment Request
August 28, 2007.
The Department of Labor (DOL)
hereby announces the submission of the
following public information collection
request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
A copy of the ICR, with applicable
supporting documentation; including
E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM
04SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50696-50699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-17229]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-417 and 731-TA-953, 954, 957-959, 961, and
962 (Review)]
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, Canada,
Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of five-year reviews concerning the countervailing
duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod (``wire rod'')
from Brazil and antidumping duty orders on wire rod from Brazil,
Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted
reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the
countervailing duty order on wire rod from Brazil and the antidumping
duty orders on wire rod from Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico,
Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to section
751(c)(2) of the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to
this notice by submitting the information specified below to the
Commission; \1\ to
[[Page 50697]]
be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is October 24,
2007. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the
Commission by November 20, 2007. For further information concerning the
conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A
through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19
CFR part 207).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ No response to this request for information is required if a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number is not
displayed; the OMB number is 3117-0016/USITC No. 08-5-173,
expiration date June 30, 2008. Public reporting burden for the
request is estimated to average 10 hours per response. Please send
comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 4, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background. On October 22, 2002, the
Department of Commerce (``Commerce'') issued a countervailing duty
order on imports of wire rod from Brazil (67 FR 64871).\2\ On October
29, 2002, Commerce issued antidumping duty orders on imports of wire
rod from Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and
Tobago, and Ukraine (67 FR 65944-65947). The Commission is conducting
reviews to determine whether revocation of the orders would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the
domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. It will assess
the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of
institution to determine whether to conduct full reviews or expedited
reviews. The Commission's determinations in any expedited reviews will
be based on the facts available, which may include information provided
in response to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A countervailing duty order on imports of wire rod from
Canada was also issued by Commerce in the same notice; however, that
order was subsequently revoked by Commerce (69 FR 3330, January 23,
2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitions. The following definitions apply to these reviews:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is
within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by Commerce.
(2) The Subject Countries in these reviews are Brazil, Canada,
Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product
or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original
determinations, the Commission found a single Domestic Like Product
consisting of: (1) All carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod included
within Commerce's scope, and (2) the grade 1080 tire bead and grade
1080 tire cord quality wire rod that had been excluded from Commerce's
scope. One Commissioner defined the Domestic Like Product differently.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the
Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of
the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total
domestic production of the product. In its original determinations, the
Commission found a single Domestic Industry consisting of all U.S.
producers of the Domestic Like Product which, as stated above, consists
of all wire rod corresponding to Commerce's scope as well as the
certain grade 1080 tire cord and grade 1080 tire bead wire rod products
that Commerce had excluded from the scope. One Commissioner defined the
Domestic Industry differently.
(5) The Order Dates are the dates that the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders under review became effective. In these
reviews, the Order Date concerning the countervailing duty order on
imports of wire rod from Brazil is October 22, 2002, and the Order Date
concerning the antidumping duty orders on imports of wire rod from
Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and
Ukraine is October 29, 2002.
(6) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or
through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject
Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or
through its selling agent.
Participation in the reviews and public service list. Persons,
including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the
merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer
organizations, wishing to participate in the reviews as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in Sec. 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission's rules, no later than
21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The
Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and
addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to
the reviews.
Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are reminded that they are required, pursuant to 19
CFR 201.15, to seek Commission approval if the matter in which they are
seeking to appear was pending in any manner or form during their
Commission employment. The Commission's designated agency ethics
official has advised that a five-year review is the ``same particular
matter'' as the underlying original investigation for purposes of 19
CFR 201.15 and 18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment statute for Federal
employees. Former employees may seek informal advice from Commission
ethics officials with respect to this and the related issue of whether
the employee's participation was ``personal and substantial.'' However,
any informal consultation will not relieve former employees of the
obligation to seek approval to appear from the Commission under its
rule 201.15. For ethics advice, contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy
Agency Ethics Official, at 202-205-3088.
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under
an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list. Pursuant
to Sec. 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary will make
BPI submitted in these reviews available to authorized applicants under
the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made no
later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as
defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A
separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those
parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
Certification. Pursuant to Sec. 207.3 of the Commission's rules,
any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with
these reviews must certify that the information is accurate and
complete to the best of the submitter's knowledge. In making the
certification, the submitter
[[Page 50698]]
will be deemed to consent, unless otherwise specified, for the
Commission, its employees, and contract personnel to use the
information provided in any other reviews or investigations of the same
or comparable products which the Commission conducts under Title VII of
the Act, or in internal audits and investigations relating to the
programs and operations of the Commission pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix
3.
Written submissions. Pursuant to Sec. 207.61 of the Commission's
rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the
information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is
October 24, 2007. Pursuant to Sec. 207.62(b) of the Commission's
rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1))
may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the
notice of institution and whether the Commission should conduct
expedited or full reviews. The deadline for filing such comments is
November 20, 2007. All written submissions must conform with the
provisions of Sec. Sec. 201.8 and 207.3 of the Commission's rules and
any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the
requirements of Sec. Sec. 201.6 and 207.7 of the Commission's rules.
The Commission's rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent
permitted by Sec. 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR
68036 (November 8, 2002). Also, in accordance with Sec. Sec. 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission's rules, each document filed by a party to
the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as
identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate),
and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are
not a party to the reviews you do not need to serve your response).
Inability to provide requested information. Pursuant to Sec.
207.61(c) of the Commission's rules, any interested party that cannot
furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form
and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time,
provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this
notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the
notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to
this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the
party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act in making its
determinations in the reviews.
Information to be Provided in Response to this Notice of
Institution: If you are a domestic producer, union/worker group, or
trade/business association; import/export Subject Merchandise from more
than one Subject Country; or produce Subject Merchandise in more than
one Subject Country, you may file a single response. If you do so,
please ensure that your response to each question includes the
information requested for each pertinent Subject Country. As used
below, the term ``firm'' includes any related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World
Wide Web address if available) and name, telephone number, fax number,
and e-mail address of the certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is a U.S.
producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a
U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or
exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or
business association, or another interested party (including an
explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or
which are members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to
participate in these reviews by providing information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the
antidumping and countervailing duty orders on the Domestic Industry in
general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please
discuss the various factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19
U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely
price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of
Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of
the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the
nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act
(19 U.S.C 1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of
the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in
each Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject
Merchandise to the United States or other countries since the Order
Date.
(7) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product,
provide the following information on your firm's operations on that
product during calendar year 2006 (report quantity data in short tons
and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/
worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on
an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/
which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product
accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) The quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the
Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and
(c) The quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s).
(8) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of
U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject
Country(ies), provide the following information on your firm's(s')
operations on that product during calendar year 2006 (report quantity
data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis,
for the firms which are members of your association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including
antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise
from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') imports;
(b) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject
Merchandise imported from each Subject Country; and
(c) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country.
(9) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business
association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country(ies), provide the following information on your
firm's(s') operations on that product during calendar year 2006 (report
quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and
duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or
countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for
[[Page 50699]]
the firms which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in each Subject
Country accounted for by your firm's(s') production; and
(b) The quantity and value of your firm's(s') exports to the United
States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise
from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') exports.
(10) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Countries since the Order Dates, and
significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a
reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include
technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to
increase production (including the shift of production facilities used
for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs
into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply
among different national markets (including barriers to importation in
foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions
to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and
availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among
the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject
Merchandise produced in the Subject Countries, and such merchandise
from other countries.
(11) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you
disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why
and provide alternative definitions.
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to Sec. 207.61 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 27, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-17229 Filed 8-31-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P