In the Matter of Certain Sucralose, Sweeteners Containing Sucralose, and Related Intermediate Compounds Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting the Motion of JK Sucralose To Intervene as Respondent, 49731 [E7-17085]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 29, 2007 / Notices
Issued: August 23, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–17084 Filed 8–28–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–604]
In the Matter of Certain Sucralose,
Sweeteners Containing Sucralose, and
Related Intermediate Compounds
Thereof; Notice of Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Granting the Motion of
JK Sucralose To Intervene as
Respondent
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
of the presiding administrative law
judge (‘‘ALJ’’), granting the motion of JK
Sucralose (‘‘JK’’) to intervene as
respondent.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James A. Worth, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3065. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
investigation was instituted on May 10,
2007, based upon a complaint filed on
behalf of Tate & Lyle Technology Ltd. of
London, United Kingdom (‘‘Tate &
Lyle’’) on April 6, 2007 and
supplemented on April 13, 18, 23, and
25. 72 FR 26645 (May 10, 2007). The
complaint alleged a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:04 Aug 28, 2007
Jkt 211001
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain sucralose, sweeteners containing
sucralose, and related intermediate
compounds thereof by reason of
infringement of various claims of United
States Patent Nos. 5,470,969; 5,034,551;
4,980,463; 5,498,709; and 7,049,435.
JK moved to intervene as a respondent
in the investigation. JK asserted before
the ALJ that it is a manufacturer of
sucralose with its principal place of
business at No. 118 Renming East Road,
Sheyang County, Jiangsu 224300, P.R.
China. According to JK, two of the
named respondents, Beijing Forbest
Chemical Co., Ltd. and Forbest
International USA L.L.C., are customers
of sucralose manufactured by JK. JK
asserted that the complainant seeks
relief which could apply directly to JK,
including relief specific to its customers
and general relief prohibiting the
importation of infringing sucralose. Tate
& Lyle opposed this motion. The
Commission investigative attorney
agreed with JK.
The ALJ granted the motion, finding
that it was timely, that JK has neither
requested, nor will require, an extension
of the target date, that JK has an interest
relating to the subject matter of the
investigation, that JK’s interests are not
adequately represented by any of the
named parties, that JK’s motion will not
prejudice any of the existing parties,
and that there is good cause to grant JK’s
motion to intervene. No petitions for
review of the subject ID have been filed.
Having reviewed the relevant portions
of the record, the Commission has
determined not to review the subject ID.
This action is taken under the authority
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and of
§§ 210.19 and 210.42(h)(3) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.19, 210.42(h)(3)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 15, 2007.
Marilyn Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–17085 Filed 8–28–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Foreign Claims Settlement
Commission
Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of
Records
Foreign Claims Settlement
Commission; Justice.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49731
Revisions of Notice of Privacy
Act Systems of Records.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of
the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a,
notice is given that the Foreign Claims
Settlement Commission proposes to
modify all of its Privacy Act Systems of
Records, as identified in the list set forth
below, to include a new routine use that
allows disclosure to former employees
for purposes of responding to official
inquiries by government entities or
professional licensing authorities in
accordance with the Department of
Justice regulation governing access
under such circumstances, 28 CFR
16.300–01. The new routine use also
allows disclosure to former employees
when the Department requires
information and/or consultation
assistance from the former employee
that is necessary for personnel-related or
other official purposes regarding a
matter within that person’s former area
of responsibility.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)
and (11), the public is given a 30-day
period in which to comment; and the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), which has oversight
responsibility under the Privacy Act,
requires a 40-day period in which to
conclude its review of the systems.
Therefore, please submit any comments
by October 9, 2007. The public, OMB,
and the Congress are invited to submit
any comments to David E. Bradley,
Chief Counsel, Foreign Claims
Settlement Commission, Washington,
DC 20579 (Room 6002, Bicentennial
Building). In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552a(r), the Commission has provided a
report to OMB and the Congress.
Accordingly, pursuant to the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Foreign
Claims Settlement Commission hereby
publishes notice of its proposal to
supplement the list of Routine Uses of
the Records Maintained in each of its
below-listed Privacy Act Systems of
Records, including the Categories of
Users and the Purposes of Such Uses, by
including the following additional
Routine Use: ‘‘The Commission may
disclose relevant and necessary
information to a former employee of the
Commission for purposes of: responding
to an official inquiry by a federal, state,
or local government entity or
professional licensing authority, in
accordance with applicable Department
of Justice regulations; or facilitating
communications with a former
employee that may be necessary for
personnel-related or other official
purposes where the Commission
requires information and/or
consultation assistance from the former
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 49731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-17085]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-604]
In the Matter of Certain Sucralose, Sweeteners Containing
Sucralose, and Related Intermediate Compounds Thereof; Notice of
Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting the Motion of JK Sucralose To Intervene as Respondent
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review the initial determination
(``ID'') of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ''), granting
the motion of JK Sucralose (``JK'') to intervene as respondent.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James A. Worth, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3065. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on May 10,
2007, based upon a complaint filed on behalf of Tate & Lyle Technology
Ltd. of London, United Kingdom (``Tate & Lyle'') on April 6, 2007 and
supplemented on April 13, 18, 23, and 25. 72 FR 26645 (May 10, 2007).
The complaint alleged a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain sucralose, sweeteners containing
sucralose, and related intermediate compounds thereof by reason of
infringement of various claims of United States Patent Nos. 5,470,969;
5,034,551; 4,980,463; 5,498,709; and 7,049,435.
JK moved to intervene as a respondent in the investigation. JK
asserted before the ALJ that it is a manufacturer of sucralose with its
principal place of business at No. 118 Renming East Road, Sheyang
County, Jiangsu 224300, P.R. China. According to JK, two of the named
respondents, Beijing Forbest Chemical Co., Ltd. and Forbest
International USA L.L.C., are customers of sucralose manufactured by
JK. JK asserted that the complainant seeks relief which could apply
directly to JK, including relief specific to its customers and general
relief prohibiting the importation of infringing sucralose. Tate & Lyle
opposed this motion. The Commission investigative attorney agreed with
JK.
The ALJ granted the motion, finding that it was timely, that JK has
neither requested, nor will require, an extension of the target date,
that JK has an interest relating to the subject matter of the
investigation, that JK's interests are not adequately represented by
any of the named parties, that JK's motion will not prejudice any of
the existing parties, and that there is good cause to grant JK's motion
to intervene. No petitions for review of the subject ID have been
filed.
Having reviewed the relevant portions of the record, the Commission
has determined not to review the subject ID. This action is taken under
the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19
U.S.C. 1337), and of Sec. Sec. 210.19 and 210.42(h)(3) of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.19,
210.42(h)(3)).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 15, 2007.
Marilyn Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-17085 Filed 8-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
