In the Matter of Certain Lighting Products, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement, 47072 [E7-16546]

Download as PDF jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES 47072 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Notices contract for conveyance of nonproject M&I water through Colorado-Big Thompson Project facilities. Contract was executed March 23, 2007. 29. Buford-Trenton ID, BufordTernton Project, P–SMBP, North Dakota: Enter into a new repayment contract and power contract for additional project use pumping power for project purposes in irrigating bench lands existing within the district. Contract was executed May 7, 2007. 31. Ainsworth ID, Ainsworth Unit, Sandhills Division, P–SMBP, Ainsworth, Nebraska: Contract renewal for a long-term water service contract. Contract was executed December 26, 2006. 35. Frenchman-Cambridge ID; Meeker-Driftwood, Red Willow, and Cambridge Units; Frenchman Division: P–SMBP; Cambridge, Nebraska: Amend the repayment contract for equalization of the construction obligation payments over the remaining years of the water supply repayment obligation period, and to delay the increase in the reserve fund payments pursuant to Public Law 109–386, which was enacted on December 12, 2006. Contract was executed June 8, 2007. 36. Kansas-Bostwick ID No. 2; Courtland Unit, Bostwick Division, P– SMBP; Courtland, Kansas: Amend the repayment contract for equalization of the construction obligation payments over the remaining years of the water supply repayment obligation period, and to delay the increase in the reserve fund payments pursuant to Public Law 109–386, which was enacted on December 12, 2006. Contract was executed June 8, 2007. 37. Bostwick ID in Nebraska; Superior-Courtland and Franklin Units, Bostwick Division, P–SMBP; Red Cloud, Nebraska: Amend the repayment contract for equalization of the construction obligation payments over the remaining years of the water supply repayment obligation period, and to delay the increase in the reserve fund payments pursuant to Public Law 109– 386, which was enacted on December 12, 2006. Contract was executed June 8, 2007. 38. Webster ID; Webster Unit, Solomon Division, P–SMBP; Gaylord Kansas: Amend the repayment contract for equalization of the construction obligation payments over the remaining years of the water supply repayment obligation period, and to delay the increase in the reserve fund payments pursuant to Public Law 109–386, which was enacted on December 12, 2006. Contract was executed June 8, 2007. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Aug 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 Dated: July 5, 2007. Roseann Gonzales, Director, Office of Program and Policy Services. [FR Doc. 07–4086 Filed 8–21–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–594] In the Matter of Certain Lighting Products, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) in the above-captioned investigation terminating the investigation in its entirety on the basis of a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael K. Haldenstein, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on February 27, 2007, based on a complaint filed by Cooper Lighting, Inc. of Peachtree City, Georgia. 72 FR 8790 (February 27, 2007). The complaint, as supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’) in the importation into the United States, the PO 00000 Frm 00121 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain lighting products, components thereof, and products containing the same by reason of infringement of claims 23, 26, and 27 of U.S. Patent No. 6,082,878 and claims 1 and 7 of U.S. Patent No. 5,662,413. The complaint further alleged that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complaint requested that the Commission issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The Commission named two companies as respondents, Cordelia Lighting, Inc. and Jimway, Inc. Both companies are located in Rancho Dominguez, California. On July 12, 2007, Cooper and the two respondents filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation based upon a settlement agreement. The Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion and no party opposed the motion. On July 25, 2007, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 6) that grants the parties’ joint motion and terminates the investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement. No petitions for review were filed and the Commission has determined not to review the ID. No respondents remain in the investigation and the investigation is therefore terminated in its entirety. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and Commission rules 210.21, 210.42, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 17, 2007. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–16546 Filed 8–21–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–612] In the Matter of Certain Nitrile Rubber Gloves; Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on July 19, 2007, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Tillotson Corporation d/b/a Best Manufacturing Company of Menlo, Georgia. Tillotson filed a E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM 22AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 47072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-16546]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-594]


In the Matter of Certain Lighting Products, Components Thereof, 
and Products Containing the Same; Notice of a Commission Determination 
Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on 
the Basis of a Settlement Agreement

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') in the 
above-captioned investigation terminating the investigation in its 
entirety on the basis of a settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael K. Haldenstein, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2301. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on February 27, 2007, based on a complaint filed by Cooper Lighting, 
Inc. of Peachtree City, Georgia. 72 FR 8790 (February 27, 2007). The 
complaint, as supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``section 337'') in the importation 
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within 
the United States after importation of certain lighting products, 
components thereof, and products containing the same by reason of 
infringement of claims 23, 26, and 27 of U.S. Patent No. 6,082,878 and 
claims 1 and 7 of U.S. Patent No. 5,662,413. The complaint further 
alleged that an industry in the United States exists as required by 
subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complaint requested that the 
Commission issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The 
Commission named two companies as respondents, Cordelia Lighting, Inc. 
and Jimway, Inc. Both companies are located in Rancho Dominguez, 
California.
    On July 12, 2007, Cooper and the two respondents filed a joint 
motion to terminate the investigation based upon a settlement 
agreement. The Commission investigative attorney filed a response in 
support of the motion and no party opposed the motion. On July 25, 
2007, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 6) that grants the 
parties' joint motion and terminates the investigation on the basis of 
a settlement agreement. No petitions for review were filed and the 
Commission has determined not to review the ID. No respondents remain 
in the investigation and the investigation is therefore terminated in 
its entirety.
    This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and Commission rules 
210.21, 210.42, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 17, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-16546 Filed 8-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P