NARA Reproduction Fees, 46145-46148 [E7-16233]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 159 / Friday, August 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: August 14, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 07–4042 Filed 8–14–07; 3:42 pm]
vessels when a request to open is given.
In order to facilitate the repairs to the
pivot pier, the drawbridge must be kept
in the closed-to-navigation position.
This deviation allows the drawbridge to
remain closed-to-navigation from 8 a.m.,
beginning November 1, 2007 for a
maximum of 18 consecutive days.
There are no alternate routes for
vessels transiting this section of the
Ouachita River.
The Kansas City Southern Railroad
Drawbridge, in the closed-to-navigation
position, provides a vertical clearance of
28.0 feet above normal pool. Navigation
on the waterway consists primarily of
commercial tows and recreational
watercraft. This temporary deviation has
been coordinated with waterway users.
No objections were received.
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD08–07–019]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Ouachita River, Louisiana
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of deviation from
drawbridge regulation.
AGENCY:
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operations of the Kansas
City Southern Railroad Drawbridge,
Mile 167.1, Monroe, Louisiana across
the Ouachita River. This deviation
allows the bridge to remain closed-tonavigation from 8 a.m., beginning
November 1, 2007 for up to 18
consecutive days. The deviation is
necessary in order to finish repairs on
the pivot pier and connect the
navigation span to the pivot pier.
DATES: This temporary deviation is
effective from 8 a.m., November 1, 2007
until November 19, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this
document are available for inspection or
copying at Room 2.107F in the Robert A.
Young Federal Building, 1222 Spruce
Street, St. Louis, MO 63103–2832,
between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Bridge Administration Branch
maintains the public docket for this
temporary deviation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roger K. Wiebusch, Bridge
Administrator, (314) 269–2378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
requested a temporary deviation for the
Kansas City Southern Railroad
Drawbridge, Mile 167.1, Monroe,
Louisiana across the Ouachita River in
order to finish repairs to the pivot pier
and connect the navigation span to the
pivot pier. The Kansas City Southern
Railroad Drawbridge currently operates
in accordance with 33 CFR 117.5 which
requires the drawbridge to open
promptly and fully for the passage of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
Dated: August 7, 2007.
Roger K. Wiebusch,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–16193 Filed 8–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. CGD09–07–109]
Security Zone: Captain of the Port
Sault Ste. Marie Zone
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is enforcing
a security zone approximately one
quarter mile on each side of the
Mackinac Bridge in the Straits of
Mackinac near Mackinaw City, MI. The
purpose of this security zone is to
protect pedestrians and vessels during
the event from vessel to bridge collision.
The security zone will place
navigational and operational restrictions
on all vessels transiting through the
Straits area, under and around the
Mackinac Bridge, located between
Mackinaw City, MI, and St. Ignace, MI.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m
to 11:59 a.m. on September 3, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LCDR Christopher R. Friese, Prevention
Dept. Chief, Sector Sault Ste. Marie, 337
Water St, Sault Ste. Marie, MI 49783;
(906) 635–3220.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard is enforcing the permanent
security zone in 33 CFR 165.928 for the
Mackinac Bridge Walk on Labor Day,
September 3, 2007. The following
46145
security zone is in effect for September
3, 2007:
(1) Mackinac Bridge Walk.
Location: All waters enclosed by a
line connecting the following points:
45°50.763N: 084°43.731W, which is the
northwest corner; then east to
45°50.705N: 084°43.04W, which is the
northeast corner; then south to
45°47.242N: 084°43.634W, which is the
southeast corner; then west to
45°47.30N: 084°44.320W, which is the
southwest corner; then north to the
point of origin. [DATUM: NAD 1983].
The zone described above includes all
waters on either side of the Mackinac
Bridge within one-quarter mile of the
bridge.
In order to ensure the safety of
spectators and transiting vessels, this
security zone will be in effect for the
duration of the event. In the event that
this security zone affects shipping,
commercial vessels may request
permission from the Captain of the Port
Sault Ste. Marie to transit through the
security zone. Requests must be made in
advance and approved by the Captain of
Port before transits will be authorized.
The Captain of the Port may be
contacted via U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Sault Ste. Marie on channel 16, VHF–
FM. The Coast Guard will give notice to
the public via a Broadcast to Mariners
that the regulation is in effect.
Dated: August 3, 2007.
M.J. Huebschman,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of Port
Sault Ste. Marie.
[FR Doc. E7–16205 Filed 8–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
36 CFR Part 1258
RIN 3095–AB49
[FDMS Docket # NARA–07–0001]
NARA Reproduction Fees
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NARA is revising its fees for
reproduction of records and other
materials in the custody of the Archivist
of the United States. This rule covers
reproduction of Federal records created
by other agencies that are in the
National Archives of the United States,
donated historical materials,
Presidential records, Nixon Presidential
historical materials, and records filed
with the Office of the Federal Register.
The fees are being changed to reflect
E:\FR\FM\17AUR1.SGM
17AUR1
46146
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 159 / Friday, August 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
current costs of providing the
reproductions. This rule will affect the
public and Federal agencies.
DATES: Effective date: October 1, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Davis Heaps at 301–837–1850
or fax at 301–837–0319.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed rule was originally published
in the February 26, 2007, Federal
Register (72 FR 8327) for a sixty day
comment period. We notified several
listservs and researcher organizations
about this proposed rule and its
availability on regulations.gov. We also
posted a notice about the rule on our
Web site, https://www.archives.gov, and
in our research rooms. NARA received
1,281 timely comments on the proposed
rule. We received 1,198 timely
comments via regulations.gov and 83
timely comments by letter, fax,
communications forwarded from
Congressional offices, or other means.
Comments received on or before 11:59
p.m. on April 27, 2007, were considered
timely. NARA electronically scanned all
comments submitted outside of
www.regulations.gov and posted them
to the proposed rule docket (NARA–07–
0001) at www.regulations.gov for public
viewing.
In this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section, we provide a summary of the
provisions of the final rule with an
explanation of the changes we have
made in response to the comments on
the proposed rule. We then summarize
the public comments and the reasons for
adopting or not adopting the
recommendations in those comments in
the section ‘‘Summary of Public
Comments.’’
Changes Made in This Final Rule
In response to public comments, we
re-evaluated some of the assumptions
used when preparing the proposed rule.
Doing so allowed us to alter the
formulas for calculating the costs for
fixed fee reproductions and enabled us
to lower the fee for copies of Civil War
pension files from the proposed $125 for
a full file regardless of page count to $75
for up to 100 pages. In cases where the
number of pages in a pension file
exceeds 100, NARA reference staff will
contact the customer to advise on the
number of remaining pages in the file
and offer to produce a price quote for
those pages at $0.65 (65 cents) per page.
The customer then has the option of
remitting payment for the remaining
pages or declining to order them. These
fees will also apply to post-Civil War
pension files.
We selected 100 pages as the limit for
the $75 fee based on a further analysis
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
of Civil War pension file reproduction
orders over the last several years. Orders
averaged 106 pages because of the wide
range in number of pages per individual
order; however, more than 65% percent
of the files ordered were 100 pages or
less. Setting the number of pages at 100
allows the fee to cover the complete file
for a majority of orders while
minimizing the cost risk to NARA. We
are able to reduce the per-page fee for
copies beyond the first 100 pages
because some of the overhead in making
copies of the additional pages is
avoided.
We also lowered the fee for copies of
pre-Civil War pension files from $60 to
$50 regardless of page count. Pre-Civil
War pension files are much more
consistent in page count, particularly
Revolutionary War pension files; we
would be more likely to recover costs
with a $50 fixed fee. The changed cost
elements that contributed to our ability
to reduce the pension file fixed fees
were elimination of certain National
Archives Trust Fund (Trust Fund)
support for existing order fulfillment
systems, curtailed savings for
fulfillment system replacement, and
adjustment to projected copy contractor
costs.
We received relatively few comments
about other fixed fees, such as for land
records or pension packets. We also
received few comments on the other fee
changes in the proposed rule. On that
basis, we have made no other fee
adjustments in this final rule.
Summary of Public Comments Received
Of the commenters who identified
their profession or interest in NARA
reproductions, about half identified
themselves as genealogists or as
researchers of their family history. Some
of the latter individuals cited their
affiliation with historical societies or
hereditary organizations dependent on
copies of certain NARA records to
obtain new members or fulfill their
mission. Almost every responsive
comment objected to at least one of the
proposed fees. The majority of
comments protested the proposed fee
for Civil War pension files. We heard
from only a few self-identified academic
researchers and commercial firms, who
objected to the self-service and NARAmade proposed fees for electrostatic
copies.
Discussion of Adopted Comments for
Fixed-Fee Reproductions
A majority of commenters criticized
the proposed $125 fee for copies of Civil
War pension files, as mentioned earlier.
Because the Civil War full pension files
require the largest portion of
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
reproduction order resources, we reallocated our costs for those files
compared to other records accordingly.
The public comments led us to
reconsider the $125 price and lower the
fee increase as previously described.
Comments Relating to NARA’s FixedFee Reproduction Costs
Commenters challenged the proposed
fees by comparing the cost to obtain a
copy of a record from commercial
duplication facilities, local and state
governments, or other institutions. On
the basis of such comparisons, some
commenters said that NARA was
falsifying or exaggerating costs to
supplement funding for the agency or
raising fees in order to discourage the
public from ordering copies of records.
Commenters said that most files should
not take long to copy.
NARA response: As indicated by
preservation concerns stated in the
proposed rule, the reproduction of
archival materials cannot meaningfully
be compared to the public use of
automatic document feeder duplication
equipment at high-volume commercial
facilities. Furthermore, legal
requirements relating to cost recovery
and cost components at other
institutions or local governments may
vary considerably from those at NARA.
The copying process for archival
records, such as the 19th century
pension files, includes separating
documents having fasteners, placing
non-standard sized documents on a
copier’s glass platen, generating legible
copies, and staff time to transport the
file from the archival stack area to the
copying contractor and refiling files in
their proper places.
We firmly reject allegations that the
fees are being raised capriciously for the
purpose of supplementing funding for
the agency or reducing the number of
reproduction orders received. The law
does not permit the Archivist to make
any profit from reproduction of records
for the public. As explained in the
proposed rule, the fees for reproduction
of records in 36 CFR part 1258 are set
under the Archivist’s authority in 44
U.S.C. 2116(c):
‘‘The Archivist may charge a fee set to
recover the costs for making or authenticating
copies or reproductions of materials
transferred to his custody. Such fee shall be
fixed by the Archivist at a level which will
recover, so far as practicable, all elements of
such costs, and may, in the Archivist’s
discretion, include increments for the
estimated replacement cost of equipment.
Such fees shall be paid into, administered,
and expended as a part of the National
Archives Trust Fund* * *.’’
E:\FR\FM\17AUR1.SGM
17AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 159 / Friday, August 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
As we clearly state in our Strategic Plan,
NARA’s goal is to increase public access
to our holdings, not artificially hold
down the number of reproduction
requests: ‘‘The records we hold belong
to the public—our mission is to ensure
the public can discover, use, and learn
from the records of their Government.’’
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
Comments Suggesting Digitization as an
Alternative for Civil War Files
Some commenters said that NARA
should provide digital copies of the
Civil War pension files; some suggested
that NARA digitize on demand and email the copies, others that NARA
provide online digital copies of all files.
Commenters stressed that online digital
copies would eliminate some of NARA’s
cost considerations because staff would
no longer be involved in providing the
copies and the public would use their
own equipment, paper, and toner to
print copies.
NARA Response: Digitization on
demand would incur the same NARA
costs as photocopying the records and
NARA does not have funding for fullscale digitization of the many thousands
of Civil War pension files. NARA has
been exploring digitization partnerships
over the past few years and considers
the Civil War pension files prime
candidates for digitization under a
partnership. Nevertheless, the scope of
such a project and the need to ensure
appropriate archival handling of the
fragile records during digitization means
that there is no near-term alternative to
the current process for fulfilling fixedfee order requests for reproductions of
Civil War pension files.
Comments Suggesting Fee Alternatives
We received numerous comments
recommending alternate methods of
recovering NARA’s costs for fixed fee
reproductions relating to the perception
of fairness. Commenters who made such
recommendations said that a $125 fee
was unfair regardless of whether a Civil
War pension file contained a few or 200
pages. Comments from those who
mentioned digitization of the records
are addressed in the previous section of
this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION and
are not repeated here.
Per page pricing. Numerous
commenters said that charging a price
per page copied was the fairest method
of devising fees. Relatively few
commenters stipulated what the perpage price should be, but of those who
did, the price ranged from $0.25 to
$1.00.
Block pricing for a set number of
pages. Although fewer in number, other
commenters said that a set fee for up to
a certain number of pages would be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
more equitable. If a file contained more
pages than the set fee allotted for that
file type, a per-page fee would apply to
those extra pages if the customer
requested all the pages in the file. This
alternative pricing is the basis for the
fixed fee for full Civil War pension files
in this final rule.
Search fee. Several commenters said
that NARA should charge a search fee
for every reproduction request as a way
to recover costs even when no file is
found.
No increases. Quite a few commenters
said that the current fees were high
enough. Among the arguments against
any fee increases was that the cost of
living increases for Social Security
benefits and the inflation rate fall short
of the percentage increases NARA
proposed.
No fee. Many of the commenters
charged that their taxes already pay for
NARA’s staff and copies. Others said
that their taxes should cover those costs
or argued that their ancestors’ military
service and taxes already paid for the
public’s right to free copies. Some
commenters said that there should be no
charge for copies of records relating to
their ancestors and expressed that free
copies were an entitlement.
NARA Response: At first glance, fees
set by a per page price seem the most
fair. However, because NARA has to
recover its costs regardless of pricing
structure, the per page reproduction fee
would rise above the $0.75 per page fee
set out in the proposed rule. We
calculated that if all the costs for our
current fixed-fee records were allocated
to the NARA-made costs, the per page
price would exceed $1.00 per page. In
other words, the fee for a Civil War
pension file would likely rise to close to
the $125 proposed fee for the majority
of customers.
Searches for records are covered by
appropriations and as such, cannot be
counted among our recoverable costs.
Because of legal requirements
regarding NARA’s recovery of costs for
providing reproductions, we rejected
comments that stipulated no increases
in fees or no fees at all. NARA cannot
continue to provide reproductions at
existing rates or for free. To choose
either approach would lead to rapid
insolvency of the Trust Fund and
eliminate NARA’s capability to provide
reproductions.
Other Comments Relating to Fees
We also received comments that
criticized various Federal government
programs that commenters blamed for
draining resources away from NARA;
we considered these comments
nonresponsive.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46147
How do NARA’s costs for reproduction
services differ from costs for other
NARA services to the public?
Some of NARA’s costs for
reproduction services cover the
administration of the fee collection, as
stated in the proposed rule. The Trust
Fund, which has its own authorizing
legislation (44 U.S.C. 2307) from the
U.S. Congress, performs that function
for reproductions of NARA’s archival
holdings. The Trust Fund pays for all
copying equipment used to generate
reproductions for the public and
reimburses archival units for the staff
time spent on the reproduction for
records (including retrieval of records
for copying). In order to continue to
provide reproductions to the public,
NARA must charge fees that cover these
costs; otherwise, NARA cannot gain
revenue to keep the Trust Fund
operational.
Paperwork Reduction Act
NATF Forms 81 through 86 in this
rule were previously approved by the
Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act and bear
approval number 3095–0027 on the face
of the forms. The proposed rule stated
that NATF Form 85 required
modification to separate Civil War
pension file requests from those of other
wars and that other forms are being
modified only to update the stated fee,
and invited public comment. All
comments received addressed the fees,
not the content or format of the forms.
No comments were received on the
information collection requirements.
The forms expire April 30, 2008.
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget. As required by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, I certify that
this rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because it affects individual
researchers. This regulation does not
have any federalism implications. This
rule is not a major rule as defined in 5
U.S.C. Chapter 8, Congressional Review
of Agency Rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1258
Archives and records.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, NARA amends part 1258 of
title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 1258—FEES
1. The authority citation for part 1258
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 2116(c) and 2307.
E:\FR\FM\17AUR1.SGM
17AUR1
46148
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 159 / Friday, August 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
§ 1258.4 What reproductions are not
covered by the NARA fee schedule?
2. Amend § 1258.4 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
I
*
*
*
*
(d) Reproduction of the following
types of records using the specified
order form:
*
Type of record
Order form
(1) Passenger arrival lists .....................................................................................................
(2) Federal Census requests ................................................................................................
(3) Eastern Cherokee applications to the Court of Claims ..................................................
(4) Land entry records ..........................................................................................................
(5) Full pension file more than 75 years old (Civil War and after), up to and including 100
pages.
(6) Full pension file (pre-Civil War) ......................................................................................
(7) Pension documents packet (selected records) ...............................................................
(8) Bounty land warrant application files ..............................................................................
(9) Military service files more than 75 years old ..................................................................
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 1258.10 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
I
§ 1258.10
policy?
What is NARA’s mail order
(a) There is a minimum fee of $15.00
per order for reproductions that are sent
by mail to the customer.
*
*
*
*
*
I 4. Revise § 1258.12 to read as follows:
§ 1258.12 NARA reproduction fee
schedule.
Fee
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
Paper-to-paper copy made by the
customer on a NARA self-service
copier in the Washington, DC,
area ...............................................
Paper-to-paper copy made by the
customer on a NARA self-service
copier outside the Washington,
DC, area (regional archives and
Presidential libraries) ....................
Paper-to-paper copy made by NARA
Paper-to-paper copy made by NARA
for full Civil War pension files
(NATF Form 85) beyond the first
100 pages .....................................
Microfilm-to-paper copy made by the
customer on a NARA self-service
copier ............................................
Form
Form
Form
Form
Form
81
82
83
84
85
.............................................
.............................................
.............................................
.............................................
.............................................
$25.00
25.00
25.00
40.00
75.00
NATF
NATF
NATF
NATF
Form
Form
Form
Form
85
85
85
86
.............................................
.............................................
.............................................
.............................................
50.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
Dated: August 13, 2007.
Allen Weinstein,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. E7–16233 Filed 8–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
(a) Certification: $15.00.
(b) Electrostatic copying (in order to
preserve certain records that are in poor
physical condition, NARA may restrict
customers to photographic or other
kinds of copies instead of electrostatic
copies):
Service
NATF
NATF
NATF
NATF
NATF
date, we will charge the fees in effect at
the time the order was received.
*
[EPA–R08–OAR–2007–0465; FRL–8453–5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; State of
Colorado; Revised Denver and
Longmont Carbon Monoxide
Maintenance Plans, and Approval of
Related Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Colorado. On
September 25, 2006, the Governor’s
0.20 designee submitted revised carbon
0.75 monoxide (CO) maintenance plans for
the Denver metropolitan and Longmont
areas for the CO National Ambient Air
0.65 Quality Standard (NAAQS). These
revised maintenance plans address
maintenance of the CO standard for a
0.50 second ten-year period beyond
redesignation, extends the horizon
(c) Unlisted processes: For
years, and contains revised
reproductions not covered by this fee
transportation conformity budgets. In
schedule, see also § 1258.4. Fees for
addition, Regulation No. 11, ‘‘Motor
other reproduction processes are
Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program,’’
computed upon request.
and Regulation No. 13, ‘‘Oxygenated
Fuels Program,’’ are removed from
I 5. Revise § 1258.16 to read as follows:
Denver’s and Longmont’s revised CO
§ 1258.16 Effective date.
maintenance plans. EPA is approving
The fees in this part are effective on
Denver’s and Longmont’s revised CO
October 1, 2007. If your order was
maintenance plans, and the revised
received by NARA before this effective
transportation conformity budgets. In
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 16, 2007
$0.25
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Fee
addition, EPA is also approving the
removal of Regulation No. 11 and
Regulation No. 13 from Denver’s and
Longmont’s revised CO maintenance
plans. This action is being taken under
section 110 of the Clean Air Act.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective
on October 16, 2007 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comment by September 17, 2007. If
adverse comment is received, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket Number EPA–R08–
OAR–2007–0465, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: videtich.callie@epa.gov and
fiedler.kerri@epa.gov.
• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing
comments).
• Mail: Callie A. Videtich, Director,
Air and Radiation Program,
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129.
• Hand Delivery: Callie A. Videtich,
Director, Air and Radiation Program,
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. Such deliveries are only
accepted Monday through Friday, 8 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays. Special arrangements should
be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R08–OAR–2007–
0465. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available at https://
E:\FR\FM\17AUR1.SGM
17AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 159 (Friday, August 17, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46145-46148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-16233]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
36 CFR Part 1258
RIN 3095-AB49
[FDMS Docket NARA-07-0001]
NARA Reproduction Fees
AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NARA is revising its fees for reproduction of records and
other materials in the custody of the Archivist of the United States.
This rule covers reproduction of Federal records created by other
agencies that are in the National Archives of the United States,
donated historical materials, Presidential records, Nixon Presidential
historical materials, and records filed with the Office of the Federal
Register. The fees are being changed to reflect
[[Page 46146]]
current costs of providing the reproductions. This rule will affect the
public and Federal agencies.
DATES: Effective date: October 1, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Davis Heaps at 301-837-1850
or fax at 301-837-0319.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed rule was originally published
in the February 26, 2007, Federal Register (72 FR 8327) for a sixty day
comment period. We notified several listservs and researcher
organizations about this proposed rule and its availability on
regulations.gov. We also posted a notice about the rule on our Web
site, https://www.archives.gov, and in our research rooms. NARA received
1,281 timely comments on the proposed rule. We received 1,198 timely
comments via regulations.gov and 83 timely comments by letter, fax,
communications forwarded from Congressional offices, or other means.
Comments received on or before 11:59 p.m. on April 27, 2007, were
considered timely. NARA electronically scanned all comments submitted
outside of www.regulations.gov and posted them to the proposed rule
docket (NARA-07-0001) at www.regulations.gov for public viewing.
In this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section, we provide a summary of
the provisions of the final rule with an explanation of the changes we
have made in response to the comments on the proposed rule. We then
summarize the public comments and the reasons for adopting or not
adopting the recommendations in those comments in the section ``Summary
of Public Comments.''
Changes Made in This Final Rule
In response to public comments, we re-evaluated some of the
assumptions used when preparing the proposed rule. Doing so allowed us
to alter the formulas for calculating the costs for fixed fee
reproductions and enabled us to lower the fee for copies of Civil War
pension files from the proposed $125 for a full file regardless of page
count to $75 for up to 100 pages. In cases where the number of pages in
a pension file exceeds 100, NARA reference staff will contact the
customer to advise on the number of remaining pages in the file and
offer to produce a price quote for those pages at $0.65 (65 cents) per
page. The customer then has the option of remitting payment for the
remaining pages or declining to order them. These fees will also apply
to post-Civil War pension files.
We selected 100 pages as the limit for the $75 fee based on a
further analysis of Civil War pension file reproduction orders over the
last several years. Orders averaged 106 pages because of the wide range
in number of pages per individual order; however, more than 65% percent
of the files ordered were 100 pages or less. Setting the number of
pages at 100 allows the fee to cover the complete file for a majority
of orders while minimizing the cost risk to NARA. We are able to reduce
the per-page fee for copies beyond the first 100 pages because some of
the overhead in making copies of the additional pages is avoided.
We also lowered the fee for copies of pre-Civil War pension files
from $60 to $50 regardless of page count. Pre-Civil War pension files
are much more consistent in page count, particularly Revolutionary War
pension files; we would be more likely to recover costs with a $50
fixed fee. The changed cost elements that contributed to our ability to
reduce the pension file fixed fees were elimination of certain National
Archives Trust Fund (Trust Fund) support for existing order fulfillment
systems, curtailed savings for fulfillment system replacement, and
adjustment to projected copy contractor costs.
We received relatively few comments about other fixed fees, such as
for land records or pension packets. We also received few comments on
the other fee changes in the proposed rule. On that basis, we have made
no other fee adjustments in this final rule.
Summary of Public Comments Received
Of the commenters who identified their profession or interest in
NARA reproductions, about half identified themselves as genealogists or
as researchers of their family history. Some of the latter individuals
cited their affiliation with historical societies or hereditary
organizations dependent on copies of certain NARA records to obtain new
members or fulfill their mission. Almost every responsive comment
objected to at least one of the proposed fees. The majority of comments
protested the proposed fee for Civil War pension files. We heard from
only a few self-identified academic researchers and commercial firms,
who objected to the self-service and NARA-made proposed fees for
electrostatic copies.
Discussion of Adopted Comments for Fixed-Fee Reproductions
A majority of commenters criticized the proposed $125 fee for
copies of Civil War pension files, as mentioned earlier. Because the
Civil War full pension files require the largest portion of
reproduction order resources, we re-allocated our costs for those files
compared to other records accordingly. The public comments led us to
reconsider the $125 price and lower the fee increase as previously
described.
Comments Relating to NARA's Fixed-Fee Reproduction Costs
Commenters challenged the proposed fees by comparing the cost to
obtain a copy of a record from commercial duplication facilities, local
and state governments, or other institutions. On the basis of such
comparisons, some commenters said that NARA was falsifying or
exaggerating costs to supplement funding for the agency or raising fees
in order to discourage the public from ordering copies of records.
Commenters said that most files should not take long to copy.
NARA response: As indicated by preservation concerns stated in the
proposed rule, the reproduction of archival materials cannot
meaningfully be compared to the public use of automatic document feeder
duplication equipment at high-volume commercial facilities.
Furthermore, legal requirements relating to cost recovery and cost
components at other institutions or local governments may vary
considerably from those at NARA. The copying process for archival
records, such as the 19th century pension files, includes separating
documents having fasteners, placing non-standard sized documents on a
copier's glass platen, generating legible copies, and staff time to
transport the file from the archival stack area to the copying
contractor and refiling files in their proper places.
We firmly reject allegations that the fees are being raised
capriciously for the purpose of supplementing funding for the agency or
reducing the number of reproduction orders received. The law does not
permit the Archivist to make any profit from reproduction of records
for the public. As explained in the proposed rule, the fees for
reproduction of records in 36 CFR part 1258 are set under the
Archivist's authority in 44 U.S.C. 2116(c):
``The Archivist may charge a fee set to recover the costs for
making or authenticating copies or reproductions of materials
transferred to his custody. Such fee shall be fixed by the Archivist
at a level which will recover, so far as practicable, all elements
of such costs, and may, in the Archivist's discretion, include
increments for the estimated replacement cost of equipment. Such
fees shall be paid into, administered, and expended as a part of the
National Archives Trust Fund* * *.''
[[Page 46147]]
As we clearly state in our Strategic Plan, NARA's goal is to increase
public access to our holdings, not artificially hold down the number of
reproduction requests: ``The records we hold belong to the public--our
mission is to ensure the public can discover, use, and learn from the
records of their Government.''
Comments Suggesting Digitization as an Alternative for Civil War Files
Some commenters said that NARA should provide digital copies of the
Civil War pension files; some suggested that NARA digitize on demand
and e-mail the copies, others that NARA provide online digital copies
of all files. Commenters stressed that online digital copies would
eliminate some of NARA's cost considerations because staff would no
longer be involved in providing the copies and the public would use
their own equipment, paper, and toner to print copies.
NARA Response: Digitization on demand would incur the same NARA
costs as photocopying the records and NARA does not have funding for
full-scale digitization of the many thousands of Civil War pension
files. NARA has been exploring digitization partnerships over the past
few years and considers the Civil War pension files prime candidates
for digitization under a partnership. Nevertheless, the scope of such a
project and the need to ensure appropriate archival handling of the
fragile records during digitization means that there is no near-term
alternative to the current process for fulfilling fixed-fee order
requests for reproductions of Civil War pension files.
Comments Suggesting Fee Alternatives
We received numerous comments recommending alternate methods of
recovering NARA's costs for fixed fee reproductions relating to the
perception of fairness. Commenters who made such recommendations said
that a $125 fee was unfair regardless of whether a Civil War pension
file contained a few or 200 pages. Comments from those who mentioned
digitization of the records are addressed in the previous section of
this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION and are not repeated here.
Per page pricing. Numerous commenters said that charging a price
per page copied was the fairest method of devising fees. Relatively few
commenters stipulated what the per-page price should be, but of those
who did, the price ranged from $0.25 to $1.00.
Block pricing for a set number of pages. Although fewer in number,
other commenters said that a set fee for up to a certain number of
pages would be more equitable. If a file contained more pages than the
set fee allotted for that file type, a per-page fee would apply to
those extra pages if the customer requested all the pages in the file.
This alternative pricing is the basis for the fixed fee for full Civil
War pension files in this final rule.
Search fee. Several commenters said that NARA should charge a
search fee for every reproduction request as a way to recover costs
even when no file is found.
No increases. Quite a few commenters said that the current fees
were high enough. Among the arguments against any fee increases was
that the cost of living increases for Social Security benefits and the
inflation rate fall short of the percentage increases NARA proposed.
No fee. Many of the commenters charged that their taxes already pay
for NARA's staff and copies. Others said that their taxes should cover
those costs or argued that their ancestors' military service and taxes
already paid for the public's right to free copies. Some commenters
said that there should be no charge for copies of records relating to
their ancestors and expressed that free copies were an entitlement.
NARA Response: At first glance, fees set by a per page price seem
the most fair. However, because NARA has to recover its costs
regardless of pricing structure, the per page reproduction fee would
rise above the $0.75 per page fee set out in the proposed rule. We
calculated that if all the costs for our current fixed-fee records were
allocated to the NARA-made costs, the per page price would exceed $1.00
per page. In other words, the fee for a Civil War pension file would
likely rise to close to the $125 proposed fee for the majority of
customers.
Searches for records are covered by appropriations and as such,
cannot be counted among our recoverable costs.
Because of legal requirements regarding NARA's recovery of costs
for providing reproductions, we rejected comments that stipulated no
increases in fees or no fees at all. NARA cannot continue to provide
reproductions at existing rates or for free. To choose either approach
would lead to rapid insolvency of the Trust Fund and eliminate NARA's
capability to provide reproductions.
Other Comments Relating to Fees
We also received comments that criticized various Federal
government programs that commenters blamed for draining resources away
from NARA; we considered these comments nonresponsive.
How do NARA's costs for reproduction services differ from costs for
other NARA services to the public?
Some of NARA's costs for reproduction services cover the
administration of the fee collection, as stated in the proposed rule.
The Trust Fund, which has its own authorizing legislation (44 U.S.C.
2307) from the U.S. Congress, performs that function for reproductions
of NARA's archival holdings. The Trust Fund pays for all copying
equipment used to generate reproductions for the public and reimburses
archival units for the staff time spent on the reproduction for records
(including retrieval of records for copying). In order to continue to
provide reproductions to the public, NARA must charge fees that cover
these costs; otherwise, NARA cannot gain revenue to keep the Trust Fund
operational.
Paperwork Reduction Act
NATF Forms 81 through 86 in this rule were previously approved by
the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act
and bear approval number 3095-0027 on the face of the forms. The
proposed rule stated that NATF Form 85 required modification to
separate Civil War pension file requests from those of other wars and
that other forms are being modified only to update the stated fee, and
invited public comment. All comments received addressed the fees, not
the content or format of the forms. No comments were received on the
information collection requirements. The forms expire April 30, 2008.
This rule is not a significant regulatory action for the purposes
of Executive Order 12866 and has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, I
certify that this rule will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities because it affects individual
researchers. This regulation does not have any federalism implications.
This rule is not a major rule as defined in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 8,
Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1258
Archives and records.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, NARA amends part 1258 of
title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 1258--FEES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1258 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 2116(c) and 2307.
[[Page 46148]]
0
2. Amend Sec. 1258.4 by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 1258.4 What reproductions are not covered by the NARA fee
schedule?
* * * * *
(d) Reproduction of the following types of records using the
specified order form:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of record Order form Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Passenger arrival lists.......... NATF Form 81............ $25.00
(2) Federal Census requests.......... NATF Form 82............ 25.00
(3) Eastern Cherokee applications to NATF Form 83............ 25.00
the Court of Claims.
(4) Land entry records............... NATF Form 84............ 40.00
(5) Full pension file more than 75 NATF Form 85............ 75.00
years old (Civil War and after), up
to and including 100 pages.
(6) Full pension file (pre-Civil War) NATF Form 85............ 50.00
(7) Pension documents packet NATF Form 85............ 25.00
(selected records).
(8) Bounty land warrant application NATF Form 85............ 25.00
files.
(9) Military service files more than NATF Form 86............ 25.00
75 years old.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 1258.10 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 1258.10 What is NARA's mail order policy?
(a) There is a minimum fee of $15.00 per order for reproductions
that are sent by mail to the customer.
* * * * *
0
4. Revise Sec. 1258.12 to read as follows:
Sec. 1258.12 NARA reproduction fee schedule.
(a) Certification: $15.00.
(b) Electrostatic copying (in order to preserve certain records
that are in poor physical condition, NARA may restrict customers to
photographic or other kinds of copies instead of electrostatic copies):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paper-to-paper copy made by the customer on a NARA self-service $0.25
copier in the Washington, DC, area............................
Paper-to-paper copy made by the customer on a NARA self-service 0.20
copier outside the Washington, DC, area (regional archives and
Presidential libraries).......................................
Paper-to-paper copy made by NARA............................... 0.75
Paper-to-paper copy made by NARA for full Civil War pension 0.65
files (NATF Form 85) beyond the first 100 pages...............
Microfilm-to-paper copy made by the customer on a NARA self- 0.50
service copier................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) Unlisted processes: For reproductions not covered by this fee
schedule, see also Sec. 1258.4. Fees for other reproduction processes
are computed upon request.
0
5. Revise Sec. 1258.16 to read as follows:
Sec. 1258.16 Effective date.
The fees in this part are effective on October 1, 2007. If your
order was received by NARA before this effective date, we will charge
the fees in effect at the time the order was received.
Dated: August 13, 2007.
Allen Weinstein,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. E7-16233 Filed 8-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P