Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Notice of Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 45221-45223 [E7-15810]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 155 / Monday, August 13, 2007 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of
August 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary of Commercefor Import
Administration, Alternate Chairman,
Foreign–Trade Zones Board.
Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–15807 Filed 8–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign–Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 1516]
Approval for Manufacturing Authority,
Motorola Inc. (Mobile Phone Kitting),
Fort Worth, Texas
Pursuant to its authority under the
Foreign–Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the Foreign–
Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Whereas, the Alliance Corridor, Inc.,
grantee of FTZ 196, has requested
manufacturing authority at sites in Fort
Worth, Texas on behalf of Motorola Inc.
(Motorola) (FTZ Docket 6–2007, filed 2/
16/2007);
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment has been given in the Federal
Register (72 FR 9304–9305, 3/1/2007);
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board’s regulations are satisfied, and
that approval of the application is in the
public interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application for manufacturing
authority within FTZ 196 on behalf of
Motorola is approved, subject to the
FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations,
including § 400.28.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of
August 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary of Commercefor Import
Administration, Alternate Chairman,
Foreign–Trade Zones Board.
Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–15811 Filed 8–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:04 Aug 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket No. 33–2007]
Foreign-Trade Zone 147—Reading, PA;
Application for Subzone Souriau USA
(Aerospace, Industrial and R/F
Connectors); York, PA
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the
Board) by the Foreign-Trade Zone
Corporation of Southeastern
Pennsylvania, grantee of FTZ 147,
requesting special-purpose subzone
status for the manufacture of aerospace,
industrial and R/F connectors at the
facility of Souriau USA (Souriau),
located in York, Pennsylvania. The
application was submitted pursuant to
the provisions of the Foreign-Trade
Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–
81u), and the regulations of the Board
(15 CFR part 400). It was formally filed
on August 3, 2007.
The Souriau facility (110 employees,
5 acres) is located at 25 Grumbacher
Road, in York, Pennsylvania. The
facility will be used for the kitting of
connector parts and manufacturing and
storage of cable connectors and
assemblies (HTS duty rate ranges from
duty-free 3.5%). Components and
materials sourced from abroad
(representing 95% of the value of the
finished product) include: Electrical
connectors; and male and female
contacts (duty rate 3.5%).
FTZ procedures would exempt
Souriau from customs duty payments on
the foreign components used in export
production. The company anticipates
that some 95 percent of the plant’s
shipments will be exported. On its
domestic sales, Souriau would be able
to choose the duty rates during customs
entry procedures that apply to finished
connectors and kits for the foreign
inputs noted above. The request
indicates that the savings from FTZ
procedures would help improve the
plant’s international competitiveness.
In accordance with the Board’s
regulations, a member of the FTZ staff
has been designated examiner to
investigate the application and report to
the Board.
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions (original
and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the
Board’s Executive Secretary at the
address below. The closing period for
their receipt is October 12, 2007.
Rebuttal comments in response to
material submitted during the foregoing
period may be submitted during the
subsequent 15-day period to October 29,
2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45221
A copy of the application and
accompanying exhibits will be available
for public inspection at each of the
following locations:
U.S. Department of Commerce Export
Assistance Center, 2 So. George Street,
Cumberland House, Millersville, PA
17551–0302.
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Room
2111, 1401 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Whiteman at
Elizabeth_Whiteman@ita.doc.gov or
(202) 482–0473.
Dated: August 3, 2007.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07–3940 Filed 8–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–809]
Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges
from India: Notice of Final Results and
Partial Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 7, 2007, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
forged stainless steel flanges from India.
This administrative review covers
imports from Echjay Forgings Pvt., Ltd.
(Echjay) and Rollwell Forge, Ltd.
(Rollwell), manufacturers/exporters of
the subject merchandise; we are
rescinding this review with respect to
Shree Ganesh Forgings, Ltd. (Shree
Ganesh). The period of review is
February 1, 2005, through January 31,
2006. As a result of our analysis of
Echjay’s comments we have made no
changes to our calculations. With
respect to Rollwell, we have calculated
a margin rather than use adverse facts
available as in the preliminary results.
We disclosed the post–preliminary
calculated margin to Rollwell on June 6,
2007. In these final results we have
made one change to our June 6, 2007
analysis for Rollwell. The final results
for both Echjay and Rollwell are listed
below in the Final Results of Review
section.
AGENCY:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
August 13, 2007.
45222
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 155 / Monday, August 13, 2007 / Notices
Fred
Baker or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–2924 or (202) 482–
0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Background
On March 7, 2007, the Department
published the preliminary results of
review of the antidumping duty order
on certain forged stainless steel flanges
(stainless steel flanges) from India. See
Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges
From India; Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review 72 FR 10142 (March 7, 2007)
(Preliminary Results). In those
preliminary results we announced our
calculated margins for Echjay and
Rollwell and our intent to rescind the
review with respect to Shree Ganesh
because we determined that Shree
Ganesh had no shipments during the
period of review (POR). We also
announced that we were basing our
preliminary results with respect to
Rollwell on adverse facts available
(AFA). However, as discussed below,
we stated we would afford Rollwell
another opportunity to submit
information necessary to calculate a
margin.
We invited interested parties to
comment on our preliminary results. We
received comments from Echjay on
March 8, 2007, and from Rollwell on
June 28, 2007, and July 9, 2007. We
received no comments from Shree
Ganesh.
On July 6, 2007, the Department
extended the due date for the final
results to August 6, 2007. See Notice of
Extension of Time Limit for the Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Certain Forged
Stainless Steel Flanges from India, 72
FR 36959 (July 6, 2007).
Rollwell
As discussed above, in the
preliminary results of review the
Department assigned Rollwell a margin
based on the facts available, but also
announced its intent to issue to Rollwell
a supplemental questionnaire after
publication of the preliminary results.
We issued this supplemental
questionnaire on March 9, 2007.
Rollwell submitted its response on
March 22, 2007. Based on our analysis
of this response, we calculated a margin
for Rollwell. On June 6, 2007, the
Department disclosed this calculated
margin to Rollwell, and invited
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Aug 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
interested parties to comment. Rollwell
submitted comments on June 28, 2007.
On July 2, 2007, the Department issued
a letter to Rollwell in which it corrected
a misstatement it had made in its June
6, 2007, analysis memorandum
regarding its rationale for denying a
scrap offset to Rollwell’s reported
material costs. We invited Rollwell to
comment on our correct rationale. We
received Rollwell’s comments on July 9,
2007.
In these final results we have made
one change to our June 6, 2007, margin
calculation based on our own analysis
of Rollwell’s data. Specifically, we
recalculated Rollwell’s material costs to
exclude post period of review (POR)
purchases of stainless steel billets. See
our ‘‘Analysis of Data Submitted by
Rollwell Forge Ltd. (Rollwell) for the
Final Results of the 2005–2006
Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Stainless
Steel Flanges from India)’’ at Section II.
We have not made any changes to
Rollwell’s calculation based on its June
28, 2007, and July 9, 2007, comments.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order
are certain forged stainless steel flanges,
both finished and not finished,
generally manufactured to specification
ASTM A–182, and made in alloys such
as 304, 304L, 316, and 316L. The scope
includes five general types of flanges.
They are weld–neck, used for butt–weld
line connection; threaded, used for
threaded line connections; slip–on and
lap joint, used with stub–ends/butt–
weld line connections; socket weld,
used to fit pipe into a machined
recession; and blind, used to seal off a
line. The sizes of the flanges within the
scope range generally from one to six
inches; however, all sizes of the above–
described merchandise are included in
the scope. Specifically excluded from
the scope of this order are cast stainless
steel flanges. Cast stainless steel flanges
generally are manufactured to
specification ASTM A–351. The flanges
subject to this order are currently
classifiable under subheadings
7307.21.1000 and 7307.21.5000 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheading is provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
under review is dispositive of whether
or not the merchandise is covered by the
scope of the order.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we have made no
changes to the preliminary results with
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
respect to Echjay. With respect to Shree
Ganesh, we are rescinding the review.
See below under ‘‘Partial Rescission.’’
With respect to Rollwell, we have based
the final results on the analysis we
released for comments on June 6, 2007,
and our July 2, 2007, correction to that
analysis, rather than on the AFA margin
of the March 8, 2007, preliminary
results. In addition, we have made one
change to Rollwell’s cost computation.
For details, see ‘‘Memorandum to the
File Regarding Analysis of Data
Submitted by Rollwell Forge Ltd.
(Rollwell) for the Final Results of the
2005–2006 Administrative Review,’’
dated August 6, 2007.
Partial Rescission
In our preliminary results, we
announced our preliminary decision to
rescind the review with respect to Shree
Ganesh because we determined this
company had no entries of stainless
steel flanges from Indian during the
POR. See Preliminary Results. Since
issuing the preliminary results, we have
received no new information
contradicting this determination.
Therefore, we are rescinding the
administrative review with respect to
Shree Ganesh.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in our preliminary
results are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum’’ from Stephen
J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary
Import Administration, to David M.
Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated August 6, 2007
(Decision Memorandum), which is
hereby adopted by this notice. A list of
the issues which parties have raised and
to which we have responded, all of
which are in the Decision
Memorandum, is attached to this notice
as an appendix. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised
in this review and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum which is on file in the
Central Records Unit, room B–099 of the
main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the decision memorandum
can be accessed directly on the Web at
https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy
and electronic version of the decision
memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, we
determine the weighted–average
dumping margins for the period
February 1, 2005, through January 31,
2006, to be as follows:
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 155 / Monday, August 13, 2007 / Notices
in the LTFV investigation. See
Amended Final Determination and
EchjayForgings Pvt.,
Antidumping Duty Order; Certain
Ltd. ............................
0.00 Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from
Rollwell Forge, Ltd. .......
48.68 India, 59 FR 5994 (February 9, 1994).
These cash deposit requirements shall
Assessment Rates
remain in effect until publication of the
final results of the next administrative
The Department will determine, and
review.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
Notification of Interested Parties
on all appropriate entries, pursuant to
This notice also serves as a final
section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of
reminder to importers of their
1930 (the Tariff Act), and 19 CFR
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.212(b). The Department calculated
importer–specific duty assessment rates 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
on the basis of the ratio of the total
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
amount of antidumping duties
of the relevant entries during this
calculated for the examined sales to the
review period. Failure to comply with
total entered value of the examined
sales observations for that importer. We this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
intend to issue assessment instructions
reimbursement of antidumping duties
to CBP 15 days after the date of
occurred, and in the subsequent
publication of these final results of
assessment of double antidumping
review.
duties.
The Department clarified its
This notice also is the only reminder
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
to parties subject to administrative
May 6, 2003. This clarification will
protective order (APO) of their
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by companies responsibility concerning the return or
included in these final results of review destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
for which the reviewed companies did
not know the merchandise was destined with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
for the United States. In such instances, notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
we will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all–others rate protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
if there is no rate for an intermediate
and the terms of an APO is a
company(ies) involved in the
sanctionable violation.
transaction. For a discussion of this
We are issuing and publishing these
clarification, see Notice of Policy
Concerning Assessment of Antidumping results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Tariff Act.
Cash Deposit Requirements
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Manufacturer / Exporter
Margin (percent)
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of
this notice of final results of
administrative review for all shipments
of subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication,
as provided by section 751(a)(1) of the
Tariff Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for
the reviewed companies will be the
rates indicated above; (2) for previously
investigated companies not listed above,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company–specific rate published for
the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, or in the less–than-fair–value
(LTFV) investigation, but the
manufacturer is, then the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recent period for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturer
or exporters will continue to be 162.14
percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Aug 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
Dated: August 6, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
APPENDIX - ISSUES RAISED IN
DECISION MEMORANDUM
Comment 1: Cost of Raw Materials
Comment 2: Scrap Offset
Comment 3: Revocation
45223
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Neubacher, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20230; telephone (202)
482–5823.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 2, 2007, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published in the Federal Register the
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review, 72 FR 9505
(March 2, 2007), for the March 1, 2006,
through February 28, 2007,
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel bar from Italy. On April 2, 2007,
the Department received a timely filed
request for review from Acciaierie
Valbruna S.p.A. (‘‘Valbruna’’). On April
27, 2007, the Department published in
the Federal Register the Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 72 FR 20986
(April 27, 2007), in which the
Department initiated the administrative
review of stainless steel bar from Italy.
Rescission of Antidumping
Administrative Review
On June 25, 2007, we received a
timely filed submission from Valbruna
withdrawing its request for an
administrative review. Valbruna filed its
withdrawal request within the deadline
established by section 351.213(d)(1) of
the Department’s regulations. No other
parties have requested a review of
Valbruna or any other producer or
exporter of the subject merchandise.
Therefore, we are rescinding the above–
cited administrative review in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
[FR Doc. E7–15810 Filed 8–10–07; 8:45 am]
Assessment
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. For the company for
which this review is rescinded,
antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department will
issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after publication of this notice.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–475–829]
Stainless Steel Bar from Italy: Notice of
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 13, 2007.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 155 (Monday, August 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45221-45223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-15810]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-809]
Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Notice of
Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 7, 2007, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain forged stainless steel flanges from
India. This administrative review covers imports from Echjay Forgings
Pvt., Ltd. (Echjay) and Rollwell Forge, Ltd. (Rollwell), manufacturers/
exporters of the subject merchandise; we are rescinding this review
with respect to Shree Ganesh Forgings, Ltd. (Shree Ganesh). The period
of review is February 1, 2005, through January 31, 2006. As a result of
our analysis of Echjay's comments we have made no changes to our
calculations. With respect to Rollwell, we have calculated a margin
rather than use adverse facts available as in the preliminary results.
We disclosed the post-preliminary calculated margin to Rollwell on June
6, 2007. In these final results we have made one change to our June 6,
2007 analysis for Rollwell. The final results for both Echjay and
Rollwell are listed below in the Final Results of Review section.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 13, 2007.
[[Page 45222]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Baker or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2924 or (202)
482-0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 7, 2007, the Department published the preliminary results
of review of the antidumping duty order on certain forged stainless
steel flanges (stainless steel flanges) from India. See Certain Forged
Stainless Steel Flanges From India; Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review 72 FR 10142 (March 7, 2007) (Preliminary
Results). In those preliminary results we announced our calculated
margins for Echjay and Rollwell and our intent to rescind the review
with respect to Shree Ganesh because we determined that Shree Ganesh
had no shipments during the period of review (POR). We also announced
that we were basing our preliminary results with respect to Rollwell on
adverse facts available (AFA). However, as discussed below, we stated
we would afford Rollwell another opportunity to submit information
necessary to calculate a margin.
We invited interested parties to comment on our preliminary
results. We received comments from Echjay on March 8, 2007, and from
Rollwell on June 28, 2007, and July 9, 2007. We received no comments
from Shree Ganesh.
On July 6, 2007, the Department extended the due date for the final
results to August 6, 2007. See Notice of Extension of Time Limit for
the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain
Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from India, 72 FR 36959 (July 6, 2007).
Rollwell
As discussed above, in the preliminary results of review the
Department assigned Rollwell a margin based on the facts available, but
also announced its intent to issue to Rollwell a supplemental
questionnaire after publication of the preliminary results. We issued
this supplemental questionnaire on March 9, 2007. Rollwell submitted
its response on March 22, 2007. Based on our analysis of this response,
we calculated a margin for Rollwell. On June 6, 2007, the Department
disclosed this calculated margin to Rollwell, and invited interested
parties to comment. Rollwell submitted comments on June 28, 2007. On
July 2, 2007, the Department issued a letter to Rollwell in which it
corrected a misstatement it had made in its June 6, 2007, analysis
memorandum regarding its rationale for denying a scrap offset to
Rollwell's reported material costs. We invited Rollwell to comment on
our correct rationale. We received Rollwell's comments on July 9, 2007.
In these final results we have made one change to our June 6, 2007,
margin calculation based on our own analysis of Rollwell's data.
Specifically, we recalculated Rollwell's material costs to exclude post
period of review (POR) purchases of stainless steel billets. See our
``Analysis of Data Submitted by Rollwell Forge Ltd. (Rollwell) for the
Final Results of the 2005-2006 Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Stainless Steel Flanges from India)'' at Section II. We
have not made any changes to Rollwell's calculation based on its June
28, 2007, and July 9, 2007, comments.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order are certain forged stainless
steel flanges, both finished and not finished, generally manufactured
to specification ASTM A-182, and made in alloys such as 304, 304L, 316,
and 316L. The scope includes five general types of flanges. They are
weld-neck, used for butt-weld line connection; threaded, used for
threaded line connections; slip-on and lap joint, used with stub-ends/
butt-weld line connections; socket weld, used to fit pipe into a
machined recession; and blind, used to seal off a line. The sizes of
the flanges within the scope range generally from one to six inches;
however, all sizes of the above-described merchandise are included in
the scope. Specifically excluded from the scope of this order are cast
stainless steel flanges. Cast stainless steel flanges generally are
manufactured to specification ASTM A-351. The flanges subject to this
order are currently classifiable under subheadings 7307.21.1000 and
7307.21.5000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise under
review is dispositive of whether or not the merchandise is covered by
the scope of the order.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made no
changes to the preliminary results with respect to Echjay. With respect
to Shree Ganesh, we are rescinding the review. See below under
``Partial Rescission.'' With respect to Rollwell, we have based the
final results on the analysis we released for comments on June 6, 2007,
and our July 2, 2007, correction to that analysis, rather than on the
AFA margin of the March 8, 2007, preliminary results. In addition, we
have made one change to Rollwell's cost computation. For details, see
``Memorandum to the File Regarding Analysis of Data Submitted by
Rollwell Forge Ltd. (Rollwell) for the Final Results of the 2005-2006
Administrative Review,'' dated August 6, 2007.
Partial Rescission
In our preliminary results, we announced our preliminary decision
to rescind the review with respect to Shree Ganesh because we
determined this company had no entries of stainless steel flanges from
Indian during the POR. See Preliminary Results. Since issuing the
preliminary results, we have received no new information contradicting
this determination. Therefore, we are rescinding the administrative
review with respect to Shree Ganesh.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in our preliminary results are addressed in the
``Issues and Decision Memorandum'' from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy
Assistant Secretary Import Administration, to David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated August 6, 2007
(Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list
of the issues which parties have raised and to which we have responded,
all of which are in the Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice
as an appendix. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues
raised in this review and the corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum which is on file in the Central Records Unit, room B-
099 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the decision memorandum can be accessed directly on
the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic
version of the decision memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, we determine the weighted-average
dumping margins for the period February 1, 2005, through January 31,
2006, to be as follows:
[[Page 45223]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer / Exporter Margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EchjayForgings Pvt., Ltd............................ 0.00
Rollwell Forge, Ltd................................. 48.68
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries, pursuant to section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(the Tariff Act), and 19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department calculated
importer-specific duty assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of
the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined
sales to the total entered value of the examined sales observations for
that importer. We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15
days after the date of publication of these final results of review.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in these
final results of review for which the reviewed companies did not know
the merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances,
we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others
rate if there is no rate for an intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a discussion of this clarification, see Notice of
Policy Concerning Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6,
2003).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of this notice of final results of administrative review
for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication, as provided by
section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the
reviewed companies will be the rates indicated above; (2) for
previously investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit
rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, or in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the
manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturer
or exporters will continue to be 162.14 percent, the ``all others''
rate established in the LTFV investigation. See Amended Final
Determination and Antidumping Duty Order; Certain Forged Stainless
Steel Flanges from India, 59 FR 5994 (February 9, 1994). These cash
deposit requirements shall remain in effect until publication of the
final results of the next administrative review.
Notification of Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred, and in the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
This notice also is the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion
to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act.
Dated: August 6, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
APPENDIX - ISSUES RAISED IN DECISION MEMORANDUM
Comment 1: Cost of Raw Materials
Comment 2: Scrap Offset
Comment 3: Revocation
[FR Doc. E7-15810 Filed 8-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
