Notice of Initiation of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Silicon Metal From the People's Republic of China, 43597-43598 [E7-15203]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 150 / Monday, August 6, 2007 / Notices Total Quantity Please report quantity on a metric ton basis. If any conversions were used, please provide the conversion formula and source. Terms of Sales Please report all sales on the same terms, such as ‘‘free on board’’ at port of export. Total Value All sales values should be reported in U.S. dollars. Please provide any exchange rates used and their respective dates and sources. Export Price Sales Generally, a U.S. sale is classified as an export price sale when the first sale to an unaffiliated customer occurs before importation into the United States. Please include any sales exported by your company directly to the United States. Please include any sales exported by your company to a third-country market economy reseller where you had knowledge that the merchandise was destined to be resold to the United States. If you are a producer of subject merchandise, please include any sales manufactured by your company that were subsequently exported by an affiliated exporter to the United States. Please do not include in your figures any sales of merchandise manufactured in Hong Kong. If you are a producer of subject merchandise, please include any sales manufactured by your company that were subsequently exported by an affiliated exporter to the United States. Please do not include in your figures any sales of merchandise manufactured in Hong Kong. Further Manufactured Sales Further manufacture or assembly (including re-packing) sales (further manufactured sales’’) refers to merchandise that undergoes further manufacture or assembly in the United States before being sold to the first unaffiliated customer. Further manufacture or assembly costs include amounts incurred for direct materials, labor and overhead, plus amounts for general and administrative expense, interest expense, and additional packing expense incurred in the country of further manufacture, as well as all costs involved in moving the product from the U.S. port of entry to the further manufacturer. [FR Doc. E7–15200 Filed 8–3–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–806] Constructed Export Price Sales Notice of Initiation of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Silicon Metal From the People’s Republic of China Generally, a U.S. sale is classified as a constructed export price sale when the first sale to an unaffiliated customer occurs after importation. However, if the first sale to the unaffiliated customer is made by a person in the United States affiliated with the foreign exporter, constructed export price applies even if the sale occurs prior to importation. Please include any sales exported by your company directly to the United States. Please include any sales exported by your company to a third-country market economy reseller where you had knowledge that the merchandise was destined to be resold to the United States. Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) received a timely request to conduct an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The anniversary month of this order is June. In accordance with the Department’s regulations, we are initiating this administrative review. DATES: Effective Date: August 6, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scot Fullerton or Kristina Horgan, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import AGENCY: Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–1386 or (202) 482– 8173, respectively. Background On June 1, 2007, the Department published in the Federal Register its Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 72 FR 30542 (Notice of Opportunity). In the Notice of Opportunity, the Department stated ‘‘for any party the Department was unable to locate in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an administrative review of that party absent new information as to the party’s location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party’s attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii).’’ See Notice of Opportunity, 72 FR at 30543. The Department received a timely request from Globe Metallurgical Inc. (petitioner) in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1) for an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal from the PRC. Petitioner requested an administrative review for 18 companies. Therefore, the Department is hereby initiating an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal from the PRC for the 18 companies for which the Department has received a request for review. Initiation In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), we are initiating an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal from the PRC (i.e., silicon metal originating in the PRC). We intend to issue the final results of this review on approximately June 30, 2008. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Antidumping duty proceeding Period to be reviewed PRC: 1 2 Alloychem Impex Corp. Bomet (Canada) Inc. Carbonsi Metallurgical Inc. Chemical and Alloy Inc. Coldstone Metals Inc. VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:38 Aug 03, 2007 43597 June 1, 2007 through May 31, 2007. Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM 06AUN1 43598 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 150 / Monday, August 6, 2007 / Notices Antidumping duty proceeding Period to be reviewed Crown All Corporation. Ferro-Alliages & Mineraux Inc. Gather Hope International Co. Ltd. GE Silicones (Canada). Global Minerals (Canada). Global Minerals Corp. Hunan Provincial Import and Export Group Corp. IMMECC Resources Inc. Jiangxi Gangyuan Silicon Industry Co., Ltd. Lorbec Metals Ltd. MPM Silicones, LLC. Seaview Trading. Transtrading House Ltd. 1 If one of the below-named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of silicon metal from PRC that have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporter is a part. 2 Some companies may appear to be listed twice, but there are two addresses provided in the administrative review requests for similar named companies and, therefore, we are listing them separately. Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under administrative protective orders in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Instructions for filing such applications may be found on the Department’s Web site at http://www.trade.gov/ia/. This initiation and notice are in accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Dated: July 31, 2007. James C. Doyle, Office Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9. [FR Doc. E7–15203 Filed 8–3–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P certain changes in the margin calculations. Therefore, the final results differ from the preliminary results. The final weighted–average dumping margin for the reviewed firm is listed below in the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of Review.’’ In addition, the Department received information sufficient to warrant a successor–in-interest analysis in this administrative review. Based on this information, we determine that Enpar is the successor–in-interest to Firth Rixson Special Steels Ltd. for purposes of determining antidumping duty liability. EFFECTIVE DATE: August 6, 2007. Stainless Steel Bar from the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Kate Johnson or Rebecca Trainor, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20230; telephone (202) 482–4929 and (202) 482–4007, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 30, 2007, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar (SSB) from the United Kingdom. See Stainless Steel Bar from the United Kingdom: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 72 FR 15106 (March 30, 2007) (Preliminary Results). This review covers one producer/ exporter of the subject merchandise to the United States. The period of review (POR) is March 1, 2005, through February 28, 2006. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made Background This review covers one producer/ exporter, Enpar Special Alloys Limited (formerly Firth Rixson Special Steels) (Enpar). On March 30, 2007, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on SSB from the United Kingdom. See Preliminary Results. We invited parties to comment on our preliminary results of review. On April 27, 2007, we received case briefs from Enpar and Sandvik Bioline, a producer of SSB from the United Kingdom. We received a rebuttal brief from the petitioners (i.e., Carpenter Technology Corporation, Valbruna Slater Stainless, Inc., and Electralloy Corporation, a division of G.O. Carlson, Inc.) on May FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration A–412–822 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:38 Aug 03, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2, 2007. On April 30, 2007, Enpar requested that the Department conduct a public hearing, but withdrew its hearing request on June 4, 2007. A meeting was held with Enpar’s counsel on June 20, 2007, to discuss issues raised in Enpar’s case brief. The Department has conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order For purposes of this order, the term ‘‘stainless steel bar’’ includes articles of stainless steel in straight lengths that have been either hot–rolled, forged, turned, cold–drawn, cold–rolled or otherwise cold–finished, or ground, having a uniform solid cross section along their whole length in the shape of circles, segments of circles, ovals, rectangles (including squares), triangles, hexagons, octagons, or other convex polygons. Stainless steel bar includes cold–finished stainless steel bars that are turned or ground in straight lengths, whether produced from hot–rolled bar or from straightened and cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or other deformations produced during the rolling process. Except as specified above, the term does not include stainless steel semi– finished products, cut length flat–rolled products (i.e., cut length rolled products which if less than 4.75 mm in thickness have a width measuring at least 10 times the thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in thickness having a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least twice the thickness), products that have been cut from stainless steel sheet, strip or plate, wire (i.e., cold–formed products in coils, of any uniform solid cross section along their whole length, which do not conform to the definition of flat–rolled E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM 06AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 150 (Monday, August 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43597-43598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-15203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-806]


Notice of Initiation of the Administrative Review of the 
Antidumping Duty Order on Silicon Metal From the People's Republic of 
China

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) received a timely 
request to conduct an administrative review of the antidumping duty 
order on silicon metal from the People's Republic of China (PRC). The 
anniversary month of this order is June. In accordance with the 
Department's regulations, we are initiating this administrative review.

DATES: Effective Date: August 6, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scot Fullerton or Kristina Horgan, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-
1386 or (202) 482-8173, respectively.

Background

    On June 1, 2007, the Department published in the Federal Register 
its Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended 
Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 72 FR 
30542 (Notice of Opportunity). In the Notice of Opportunity, the 
Department stated ``for any party the Department was unable to locate 
in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an 
administrative review of that party absent new information as to the 
party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request 
for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it 
requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation 
of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same 
time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to 
determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant 
to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii).'' See Notice of Opportunity, 72 FR at 
30543.
    The Department received a timely request from Globe Metallurgical 
Inc. (petitioner) in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1) for an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal 
from the PRC. Petitioner requested an administrative review for 18 
companies. Therefore, the Department is hereby initiating an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal 
from the PRC for the 18 companies for which the Department has received 
a request for review.

Initiation

    In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), we are initiating an administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on silicon metal from the PRC (i.e., silicon 
metal originating in the PRC). We intend to issue the final results of 
this review on approximately June 30, 2008.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Antidumping duty proceeding                                 Period to be reviewed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC: \1\ \2\                                  June 1, 2007 through May 31, 2007.
    Alloychem Impex Corp....................
    Bomet (Canada) Inc......................
    Carbonsi Metallurgical Inc..............
    Chemical and Alloy Inc..................
    Coldstone Metals Inc....................

[[Page 43598]]

 
    Crown All Corporation...................
    Ferro-Alliages & Mineraux Inc...........
    Gather Hope International Co. Ltd.......
    GE Silicones (Canada)...................
    Global Minerals (Canada)................
    Global Minerals Corp....................
    Hunan Provincial Import and Export Group
     Corp.
    IMMECC Resources Inc....................
    Jiangxi Gangyuan Silicon Industry Co.,
     Ltd.
    Lorbec Metals Ltd.......................
    MPM Silicones, LLC......................
    Seaview Trading.........................
    Transtrading House Ltd .................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If one of the below-named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of silicon
  metal from PRC that have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of
  the single PRC entity of which the named exporter is a part.
\2\ Some companies may appear to be listed twice, but there are two addresses provided in the administrative
  review requests for similar named companies and, therefore, we are listing them separately.

    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
administrative protective orders in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 
Instructions for filing such applications may be found on the 
Department's Web site at http://www.trade.gov/ia/.
    This initiation and notice are in accordance with section 751(a)(1) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i).

    Dated: July 31, 2007.
James C. Doyle,
Office Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9.
 [FR Doc. E7-15203 Filed 8-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P