Notice of Initiation of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Silicon Metal From the People's Republic of China, 43597-43598 [E7-15203]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 150 / Monday, August 6, 2007 / Notices
Total Quantity
Please report quantity on a metric ton
basis. If any conversions were used,
please provide the conversion formula
and source.
Terms of Sales
Please report all sales on the same
terms, such as ‘‘free on board’’ at port
of export.
Total Value
All sales values should be reported in
U.S. dollars. Please provide any
exchange rates used and their respective
dates and sources.
Export Price Sales
Generally, a U.S. sale is classified as
an export price sale when the first sale
to an unaffiliated customer occurs
before importation into the United
States.
Please include any sales exported by
your company directly to the United
States.
Please include any sales exported by
your company to a third-country market
economy reseller where you had
knowledge that the merchandise was
destined to be resold to the United
States.
If you are a producer of subject
merchandise, please include any sales
manufactured by your company that
were subsequently exported by an
affiliated exporter to the United States.
Please do not include in your figures
any sales of merchandise manufactured
in Hong Kong.
If you are a producer of subject
merchandise, please include any sales
manufactured by your company that
were subsequently exported by an
affiliated exporter to the United States.
Please do not include in your figures
any sales of merchandise manufactured
in Hong Kong.
Further Manufactured Sales
Further manufacture or assembly
(including re-packing) sales (further
manufactured sales’’) refers to
merchandise that undergoes further
manufacture or assembly in the United
States before being sold to the first
unaffiliated customer.
Further manufacture or assembly
costs include amounts incurred for
direct materials, labor and overhead,
plus amounts for general and
administrative expense, interest
expense, and additional packing
expense incurred in the country of
further manufacture, as well as all costs
involved in moving the product from
the U.S. port of entry to the further
manufacturer.
[FR Doc. E7–15200 Filed 8–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–806]
Constructed Export Price Sales
Notice of Initiation of the
Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Silicon
Metal From the People’s Republic of
China
Generally, a U.S. sale is classified as
a constructed export price sale when the
first sale to an unaffiliated customer
occurs after importation. However, if the
first sale to the unaffiliated customer is
made by a person in the United States
affiliated with the foreign exporter,
constructed export price applies even if
the sale occurs prior to importation.
Please include any sales exported by
your company directly to the United
States.
Please include any sales exported by
your company to a third-country market
economy reseller where you had
knowledge that the merchandise was
destined to be resold to the United
States.
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) received a timely
request to conduct an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on silicon metal from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC). The
anniversary month of this order is June.
In accordance with the Department’s
regulations, we are initiating this
administrative review.
DATES: Effective Date: August 6, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scot
Fullerton or Kristina Horgan, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, Import
AGENCY:
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–1386 or (202) 482–
8173, respectively.
Background
On June 1, 2007, the Department
published in the Federal Register its
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review, 72 FR 30542
(Notice of Opportunity). In the Notice of
Opportunity, the Department stated ‘‘for
any party the Department was unable to
locate in prior segments, the Department
will not accept a request for an
administrative review of that party
absent new information as to the party’s
location. Moreover, if the interested
party who files a request for review is
unable to locate the producer or
exporter for which it requested the
review, the interested party must
provide an explanation of the attempts
it made to locate the producer or
exporter at the same time it files its
request for review, in order for the
Secretary to determine if the interested
party’s attempts were reasonable,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii).’’
See Notice of Opportunity, 72 FR at
30543.
The Department received a timely
request from Globe Metallurgical Inc.
(petitioner) in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b)(1) for an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on silicon metal from the PRC.
Petitioner requested an administrative
review for 18 companies. Therefore, the
Department is hereby initiating an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on silicon
metal from the PRC for the 18
companies for which the Department
has received a request for review.
Initiation
In accordance with section 751(a)(1)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), we are initiating an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on silicon
metal from the PRC (i.e., silicon metal
originating in the PRC). We intend to
issue the final results of this review on
approximately June 30, 2008.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Antidumping duty proceeding
Period to be reviewed
PRC: 1 2
Alloychem Impex Corp.
Bomet (Canada) Inc.
Carbonsi Metallurgical Inc.
Chemical and Alloy Inc.
Coldstone Metals Inc.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:38 Aug 03, 2007
43597
June 1, 2007 through May 31, 2007.
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
43598
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 150 / Monday, August 6, 2007 / Notices
Antidumping duty proceeding
Period to be reviewed
Crown All Corporation.
Ferro-Alliages & Mineraux Inc.
Gather Hope International Co. Ltd.
GE Silicones (Canada).
Global Minerals (Canada).
Global Minerals Corp.
Hunan Provincial Import and Export Group Corp.
IMMECC Resources Inc.
Jiangxi Gangyuan Silicon Industry Co., Ltd.
Lorbec Metals Ltd.
MPM Silicones, LLC.
Seaview Trading.
Transtrading House Ltd.
1 If one of the below-named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of silicon metal from PRC that have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporter is a part.
2 Some companies may appear to be listed twice, but there are two addresses provided in the administrative review requests for similar named
companies and, therefore, we are listing them separately.
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under
administrative protective orders in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Instructions for filing such applications
may be found on the Department’s Web
site at https://www.trade.gov/ia/.
This initiation and notice are in
accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i).
Dated: July 31, 2007.
James C. Doyle,
Office Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office
9.
[FR Doc. E7–15203 Filed 8–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
certain changes in the margin
calculations. Therefore, the final results
differ from the preliminary results. The
final weighted–average dumping margin
for the reviewed firm is listed below in
the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of
Review.’’ In addition, the Department
received information sufficient to
warrant a successor–in-interest analysis
in this administrative review. Based on
this information, we determine that
Enpar is the successor–in-interest to
Firth Rixson Special Steels Ltd. for
purposes of determining antidumping
duty liability.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 6, 2007.
Stainless Steel Bar from the United
Kingdom: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Kate
Johnson or Rebecca Trainor, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20230;
telephone (202) 482–4929 and (202)
482–4007, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 30, 2007, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on stainless
steel bar (SSB) from the United
Kingdom. See Stainless Steel Bar from
the United Kingdom: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 72 FR 15106
(March 30, 2007) (Preliminary Results).
This review covers one producer/
exporter of the subject merchandise to
the United States. The period of review
(POR) is March 1, 2005, through
February 28, 2006.
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we have made
Background
This review covers one producer/
exporter, Enpar Special Alloys Limited
(formerly Firth Rixson Special Steels)
(Enpar). On March 30, 2007, the
Department published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on SSB from
the United Kingdom. See Preliminary
Results.
We invited parties to comment on our
preliminary results of review. On April
27, 2007, we received case briefs from
Enpar and Sandvik Bioline, a producer
of SSB from the United Kingdom. We
received a rebuttal brief from the
petitioners (i.e., Carpenter Technology
Corporation, Valbruna Slater Stainless,
Inc., and Electralloy Corporation, a
division of G.O. Carlson, Inc.) on May
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–412–822
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:38 Aug 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2, 2007. On April 30, 2007, Enpar
requested that the Department conduct
a public hearing, but withdrew its
hearing request on June 4, 2007. A
meeting was held with Enpar’s counsel
on June 20, 2007, to discuss issues
raised in Enpar’s case brief.
The Department has conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
For purposes of this order, the term
‘‘stainless steel bar’’ includes articles of
stainless steel in straight lengths that
have been either hot–rolled, forged,
turned, cold–drawn, cold–rolled or
otherwise cold–finished, or ground,
having a uniform solid cross section
along their whole length in the shape of
circles, segments of circles, ovals,
rectangles (including squares), triangles,
hexagons, octagons, or other convex
polygons. Stainless steel bar includes
cold–finished stainless steel bars that
are turned or ground in straight lengths,
whether produced from hot–rolled bar
or from straightened and cut rod or
wire, and reinforcing bars that have
indentations, ribs, grooves, or other
deformations produced during the
rolling process.
Except as specified above, the term
does not include stainless steel semi–
finished products, cut length flat–rolled
products (i.e., cut length rolled products
which if less than 4.75 mm in thickness
have a width measuring at least 10 times
the thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in
thickness having a width which exceeds
150 mm and measures at least twice the
thickness), products that have been cut
from stainless steel sheet, strip or plate,
wire (i.e., cold–formed products in
coils, of any uniform solid cross section
along their whole length, which do not
conform to the definition of flat–rolled
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 150 (Monday, August 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43597-43598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-15203]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-806]
Notice of Initiation of the Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Silicon Metal From the People's Republic of
China
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) received a timely
request to conduct an administrative review of the antidumping duty
order on silicon metal from the People's Republic of China (PRC). The
anniversary month of this order is June. In accordance with the
Department's regulations, we are initiating this administrative review.
DATES: Effective Date: August 6, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scot Fullerton or Kristina Horgan, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-
1386 or (202) 482-8173, respectively.
Background
On June 1, 2007, the Department published in the Federal Register
its Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 72 FR
30542 (Notice of Opportunity). In the Notice of Opportunity, the
Department stated ``for any party the Department was unable to locate
in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an
administrative review of that party absent new information as to the
party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request
for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it
requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation
of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same
time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to
determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii).'' See Notice of Opportunity, 72 FR at
30543.
The Department received a timely request from Globe Metallurgical
Inc. (petitioner) in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1) for an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal
from the PRC. Petitioner requested an administrative review for 18
companies. Therefore, the Department is hereby initiating an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal
from the PRC for the 18 companies for which the Department has received
a request for review.
Initiation
In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), we are initiating an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on silicon metal from the PRC (i.e., silicon
metal originating in the PRC). We intend to issue the final results of
this review on approximately June 30, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antidumping duty proceeding Period to be reviewed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC: \1\ \2\ June 1, 2007 through May 31, 2007.
Alloychem Impex Corp....................
Bomet (Canada) Inc......................
Carbonsi Metallurgical Inc..............
Chemical and Alloy Inc..................
Coldstone Metals Inc....................
[[Page 43598]]
Crown All Corporation...................
Ferro-Alliages & Mineraux Inc...........
Gather Hope International Co. Ltd.......
GE Silicones (Canada)...................
Global Minerals (Canada)................
Global Minerals Corp....................
Hunan Provincial Import and Export Group
Corp.
IMMECC Resources Inc....................
Jiangxi Gangyuan Silicon Industry Co.,
Ltd.
Lorbec Metals Ltd.......................
MPM Silicones, LLC......................
Seaview Trading.........................
Transtrading House Ltd .................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If one of the below-named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of silicon
metal from PRC that have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of
the single PRC entity of which the named exporter is a part.
\2\ Some companies may appear to be listed twice, but there are two addresses provided in the administrative
review requests for similar named companies and, therefore, we are listing them separately.
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
administrative protective orders in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Instructions for filing such applications may be found on the
Department's Web site at https://www.trade.gov/ia/.
This initiation and notice are in accordance with section 751(a)(1)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i).
Dated: July 31, 2007.
James C. Doyle,
Office Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9.
[FR Doc. E7-15203 Filed 8-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
