Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Linkage Fees, 42161-42163 [E7-14832]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 1, 2007 / Notices
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change permits
DTC to use the Federal Reserve Bank’s
National Settlement Service (‘‘NSS’’) for
the settlement of credit balances.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
DTC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. DTC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.2
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In 2003, DTC mandated NSS as the
vehicle for all DTC Settling Banks to
satisfy their end of day net debits.3 In
an effort to increase the efficiencies
afforded by NSS, DTC is modifying its
rules and procedures to permit DTC’s
use of NSS to also distribute net
credits.4 Utilizing NSS as the payment
mechanism for net credits will eliminate
the need for DTC to initiate wire
payments for settlement monies owed
by DTC. However, should NSS not be
available for any reason, DTC will retain
the capability to satisfy its settlement
obligations using wire transfer.
The proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of
section 17A of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder because it will
not affect the safeguarding of funds or
securities in DTC’s custody and control
or for which it is responsible.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
DTC does not believe that the
proposed rule change would have any
impact or impose any burden on
competition.
2 The Commission has modified parts of these
statements.
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48089
(June 25, 2003), 68 FR 40314 (July 7, 2003) (File No.
SR–DTC–2002–06).
4 The National Securities Clearing Corporation
(‘‘NSCC’’) has submitted a similar proposed rule
change (File No. SR–NSCC–2007–02) providing for
the use of NSS for the distribution of net-net
credits.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:12 Jul 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments relating to the
proposed rule change have not yet been
solicited or received. DTC will notify
the Commission of any written
comments received by DTC.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 5 and Rule
19b–4(f)(4) 6 promulgated thereunder
because the proposal effects a change in
an existing service of DTC that (A) Does
not adversely affect the safeguarding of
securities or funds in the custody or
control of DTC or for which it is
responsible and (B) does not
significantly affect the respective rights
or obligations of DTC or persons using
the service. At any time within sixty
days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission could have
summarily abrogated such rule change if
it appeared to the Commission that such
action was necessary or appropriate in
the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–DTC–2007–08 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–DTC–2007–08. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
PO 00000
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of DTC. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–DTC–2007–08 and should
be submitted on or before August 22,
2007.
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–14830 Filed 7–31–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–56128; File No. SR–ISE–
2007–55]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Linkage Fees
July 24, 2007.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 29,
2007, the International Securities
Exchange, LLC (‘‘ISE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been substantially prepared by the
7 17
5 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
6 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(4).
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42161
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
42162
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 1, 2007 / Notices
Exchange. This order provides notice of
the proposed rule change and approves
the proposed rule change on an
accelerated basis.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
ISE proposes to extend until July 31,
2008 the current pilot program
regarding transaction fees charged for
trades executed through the intermarket
options linkage (‘‘Linkage’’). The text of
the proposed rule change is available at
the Exchange, the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, and https://
www.ise.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item III below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule
change is to extend for one year the
pilot program establishing ISE fees for
Principal Orders (‘‘P Orders’’) and
Principal Acting as Agent Orders (‘‘P/A
Orders’’) sent through Linkage and
executed on ISE. The fees currently are
effective for a pilot period scheduled to
expire on July 31, 2007.3 This filing
would extend the pilot program for
another year, through July 31, 2008.
ISE fees affected by this filing are: The
Linkage P Order fee of $0.24 per
contract; the Linkage P/A Order fee of
$0.15 per contract; a surcharge fee of
between $0.05 and $0.15 for trading
certain licensed products; and a $0.03
comparison fee (collectively ‘‘linkage
fees’’). These are the same fees that all
ISE members pay for non-customer
transactions executed on the Exchange.4
ISE does not charge for the execution of
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54204
(July 25, 2006), 71 FR 43548 (August 1, 2006) (SR–
ISE–2006–38) (extending the Linkage fee pilot
program).
4 ISE charges these fees only to its members,
generally firms who clear P Orders and P/A Orders
for market makers on the other linked exchanges.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:12 Jul 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
Satisfaction Orders 5 sent through
Linkage and is not proposing to charge
for such orders.
The Exchange believes it is
appropriate to charge fees for P Orders
and P/A Orders executed through
Linkage. Notably, while market makers
on competing exchanges always can
match a better price on ISE, they never
are obligated to send orders to ISE
through Linkage. However, if such
market makers do seek ISE’s liquidity,
whether through conventional orders or
through the use of P Orders or P/A
Orders, the Exchange believes it is
appropriate to charge its members the
same fees levied on other non-customer
orders. ISE appreciates that there has
been limited experience with Linkage
and that the Commission is continuing
to study Linkage in general and the
effect of fees on Linkage trading. Thus,
this filing would extend the status quo
with Linkage fees for an additional year.
2. Statutory Basis
The basis under the Act for this
proposed rule change is the requirement
under section 6(b)(4) 6 that an exchange
have an equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among its members and other persons
using its facilities. As discussed above,
ISE believes that this proposed rule
change will equitably allocate fees by
having all non-customer users of ISE
transaction services pay the same fees.
The Exchange believes that, if it were to
not charge linkage fees, the Exchange’s
fee would not be equitable, in that ISE
members would be subsidizing the
trading of their competitors, all of whom
access the same trading services.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change does not
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Moreover, failing to adopt the proposed
rule change would impose a burden on
competition by requiring ISE members
to subsidize the trading of their
competitors.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received from
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
5 The term ‘‘Satisfaction Order’’ is defined in ISE
Rule 1900(10)(iii).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–ISE–2007–55 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2007–55. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2007–55 and should be
submitted on or before August 22, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 1, 2007 / Notices
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of the
Proposed Rule Change
After careful consideration, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
a national securities exchange,7 and, in
particular, the requirements of section
6(b) of the Act 8 and the rules and
regulations thereunder. The
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with section
6(b)(4) of the Act,9 which requires that
the rules of the Exchange provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its
members and other persons using its
facilities. The Commission believes that
the extension of the Linkage fee pilot
until July 31, 2008 will give the
Exchange and the Commission further
opportunity to evaluate whether such
fees are appropriate.
The Commission also finds good
cause for approving the proposed rule
change prior to the 30th day after the
date of publication of the notice of filing
thereof in the Federal Register. The
Commission believes that granting
accelerated approval of the proposed
rule change will preserve the
Exchange’s existing pilot program for
Linkage fees without interruption as the
Exchange and the Commission continue
considering the appropriateness of
Linkage fees. Therefore, the Commission
finds good cause, consistent with
section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,10
to approve the proposed rule change on
an accelerated basis.
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act,11 that the
proposed rule change (SR–ISE–2007–
55), be and it hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–14832 Filed 7–31–07; 8:45 am]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
7 In approving this rule change, the Commission
notes that it has considered the proposal’s impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation.
See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:12 Jul 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–56130; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2007–061]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; the
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Institute a
Pricing Incentive Program for Market
Makers in Exchange-Traded Funds and
Index-Linked Securities
Date: July 25, 2007.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 18,
2007, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
substantially prepared by Nasdaq. The
Exchange has designated this proposal
as one establishing or changing a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by a selfregulatory organization pursuant to
section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which
renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq proposes to institute a pricing
incentive program for market makers in
exchange-traded funds (‘‘ETFs’’) and
index-linked securities (‘‘ILSs’’) listed
on Nasdaq.5 Nasdaq plans to implement
the proposed rule change on August 1,
2007. The text of the proposed rule
change is available at the Exchange, the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
and https://www.nasdaq.com/about/
LegalCompliance.stm.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
Nasdaq included statements concerning
the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
5 The Exchange’s proposed rule text is contained
in the Nasdaq 7000 Series (Charges for Membership,
Services, and Equipment) at paragraph (g) of Rule
7018 (Nasdaq Market Center Order Execution and
Routing).
PO 00000
1 15
2 17
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42163
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Nasdaq proposes to introduce a
pricing incentive program for market
makers in ETFs and ILSs listed on
Nasdaq. In April 2007, Nasdaq executed
34.8% of all transactions in ETFs listed
on U.S. exchanges, making it the largest
market for ETF transactions. Nasdaq
also executes a large percentage of
transactions in ILSs. However, Nasdaq
currently lists fewer ETFs and ILSs than
the New York Stock Exchange LLC and
the American Stock Exchange LLC. The
proposal is designed both to enhance
Nasdaq’s competitiveness as a listing
venue for ETFs and ILSs and further
strengthen its market quality as a
transaction venue for ETFs and ILSs.
Nasdaq proposes to adopt rules that
are similar to those regarding NYSE
Arca, Inc.’s (‘‘NYSE Arca’s’’) program
for Designated Market Makers.6 Under
NYSE Arca’s program, a Designated
Market Maker for a security listed on
NYSE Arca is required to maintain
minimum performance standards with
regard to (1) Percent of time at the
national best bid (best offer) (‘‘NBBO’’),
(2) percent of executions better than the
NBBO, (3) average displayed size, (4)
average quoted spread, and (5) in the
case of derivative securities, the ability
of the Designated Market Maker to
transact in underlying markets. In
return, the Designated Market Maker
pays $0.0025 per share when accessing
liquidity in stocks for which it is the
Lead Market Maker, and receives a
$0.004 per share credit when providing
liquidity.
Under Nasdaq’s proposed program, a
market maker in an ETF or ILS may
become a ‘‘Designated Liquidity
Provider’’ in a ‘‘Qualified Security’’ and
receive similarly favorable incentive
pricing. A Qualified Security must be an
ETF or ILS listed on Nasdaq, have at
least one Designated Liquidity Provider,
and have a Nasdaq-designated
maximum trading volume. Specifically,
a security is no longer eligible to be a
6 See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.24 (Designated
Market Maker Performance Standards) and NYSE
Arca Schedule of Fees and Charges for Exchange
Services (https://www.nyse.com/pdfs/
NYSEArca_Equities_Fees.pdf).
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 147 (Wednesday, August 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42161-42163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14832]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-56128; File No. SR-ISE-2007-55]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to Linkage Fees
July 24, 2007.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 29, 2007, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE''
or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the
[[Page 42162]]
Exchange. This order provides notice of the proposed rule change and
approves the proposed rule change on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
ISE proposes to extend until July 31, 2008 the current pilot
program regarding transaction fees charged for trades executed through
the intermarket options linkage (``Linkage''). The text of the proposed
rule change is available at the Exchange, the Commission's Public
Reference Room, and https://www.ise.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item III below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule change is to extend for one year
the pilot program establishing ISE fees for Principal Orders (``P
Orders'') and Principal Acting as Agent Orders (``P/A Orders'') sent
through Linkage and executed on ISE. The fees currently are effective
for a pilot period scheduled to expire on July 31, 2007.\3\ This filing
would extend the pilot program for another year, through July 31, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54204 (July 25,
2006), 71 FR 43548 (August 1, 2006) (SR-ISE-2006-38) (extending the
Linkage fee pilot program).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ISE fees affected by this filing are: The Linkage P Order fee of
$0.24 per contract; the Linkage P/A Order fee of $0.15 per contract; a
surcharge fee of between $0.05 and $0.15 for trading certain licensed
products; and a $0.03 comparison fee (collectively ``linkage fees'').
These are the same fees that all ISE members pay for non-customer
transactions executed on the Exchange.\4\ ISE does not charge for the
execution of Satisfaction Orders \5\ sent through Linkage and is not
proposing to charge for such orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ ISE charges these fees only to its members, generally firms
who clear P Orders and P/A Orders for market makers on the other
linked exchanges.
\5\ The term ``Satisfaction Order'' is defined in ISE Rule
1900(10)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes it is appropriate to charge fees for P Orders
and P/A Orders executed through Linkage. Notably, while market makers
on competing exchanges always can match a better price on ISE, they
never are obligated to send orders to ISE through Linkage. However, if
such market makers do seek ISE's liquidity, whether through
conventional orders or through the use of P Orders or P/A Orders, the
Exchange believes it is appropriate to charge its members the same fees
levied on other non-customer orders. ISE appreciates that there has
been limited experience with Linkage and that the Commission is
continuing to study Linkage in general and the effect of fees on
Linkage trading. Thus, this filing would extend the status quo with
Linkage fees for an additional year.
2. Statutory Basis
The basis under the Act for this proposed rule change is the
requirement under section 6(b)(4) \6\ that an exchange have an
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among
its members and other persons using its facilities. As discussed above,
ISE believes that this proposed rule change will equitably allocate
fees by having all non-customer users of ISE transaction services pay
the same fees. The Exchange believes that, if it were to not charge
linkage fees, the Exchange's fee would not be equitable, in that ISE
members would be subsidizing the trading of their competitors, all of
whom access the same trading services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act. Moreover, failing to adopt the proposed rule change would
impose a burden on competition by requiring ISE members to subsidize
the trading of their competitors.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2007-55 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-55. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-55 and should be
submitted on or before August 22, 2007.
[[Page 42163]]
IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
the Proposed Rule Change
After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange,\7\ and, in particular, the requirements of section 6(b) of
the Act \8\ and the rules and regulations thereunder. The Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b)(4)
of the Act,\9\ which requires that the rules of the Exchange provide
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among its members and other persons using its facilities. The
Commission believes that the extension of the Linkage fee pilot until
July 31, 2008 will give the Exchange and the Commission further
opportunity to evaluate whether such fees are appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ In approving this rule change, the Commission notes that it
has considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission also finds good cause for approving the proposed
rule change prior to the 30th day after the date of publication of the
notice of filing thereof in the Federal Register. The Commission
believes that granting accelerated approval of the proposed rule change
will preserve the Exchange's existing pilot program for Linkage fees
without interruption as the Exchange and the Commission continue
considering the appropriateness of Linkage fees. Therefore, the
Commission finds good cause, consistent with section 19(b)(2) of the
Exchange Act,\10\ to approve the proposed rule change on an accelerated
basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\11\ that the proposed rule change (SR-ISE-2007-55), be and it
hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-14832 Filed 7-31-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P