Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change Relating to an Extension of the Linkage Fee Pilot Program, 40908-40910 [E7-14358]
Download as PDF
40908
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Notices
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed
Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the forgoing rule change does
not: (1) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (3) become
operative for 30 days after the date of
this filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act13 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.14
A proposed rule change filed under
19b–4(f)(6) normally may not become
operative prior to 30 days after the date
of filing.15 However, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) 16 permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative
delay. The Commission believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest
because such waiver would permit
position and exercise limits for options
on IWM to continue at 500,000 option
contracts for a six-month pilot period.
For this reason, the Commission
designates the proposed rule change to
be operative upon filing with the
Commission.17
13 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii) requires that a self-regulatory
organization submit to the Commission written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the
proposed rule change, at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied the fiveday pre-filing notice requirement.
16 Id.
17 For the purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
14 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:31 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Amex–2007–73 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex–2007–73. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the
principal office of Amex. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Amex–
2007–73 and should be submitted on or
before August 15, 2007.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–14312 Filed 7–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–56102; File No. SR–Amex–
2007–64]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice
of Filing and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to an Extension
of the Linkage Fee Pilot Program
July 19, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 27,
2007, the American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been
substantially prepared by the Exchange.
This order provides notice of the
proposed rule change and approves the
proposed rule change on an accelerated
basis.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend for
one year, until July 31, 2008, the current
pilot program regarding transaction fees
for trades executed through the
intermarket options linkage (the
‘‘Linkage’’) on the Exchange. The text of
the proposed rule change is available at
the Exchange, the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, and
https://www.amex.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
18 17
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Notices
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item III below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
1. Purpose
Amex proposes to extend for one year,
until July 31, 2008, the current pilot
program establishing Exchange fees for
Principal Orders (‘‘P Orders’’) and
Principal Acting As Agent Orders
(‘‘P/A Orders’’) submitted through the
Linkage. The fees in connection with
the pilot program are scheduled to
expire on July 31 2007.3
The current fees applicable to P
Orders and P/A Orders executed on the
Exchange are as follows: (i) $0.10 per
contract side options transaction fee for
equity options, exchange traded fund
share (‘‘ETF’’) options, QQQQ options
and trust issued receipt options; (ii)
$0.21 per contract side options
transaction fee for index options
(including MNX and NDX options); (iii)
$0.05 per contract side options
comparison fee; (iv) $0.05 per contract
side options floor brokerage fee; and (v)
an options licensing fee for certain ETF
and index option products ranging from
$0.15 per contract side to $0.05 per
contract side depending on the
particular ETF or index option.4 These
are the same fees charged to specialists
and registered option traders (‘‘ROTs’’)
for transactions executed on the
Exchange.5 The Exchange does not
charge for the execution of Satisfaction
Orders sent through the Linkage.
As was the case in the original pilot
program and subsequent extensions, the
Exchange believes that the existing fees
currently charged to Exchange
specialists and ROTs should also apply
to executions resulting from Linkage
Orders.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54161
(July 17, 2006), 71 FR 42141 (July 25, 2006) (SR–
Amex–2006–62).
4 See the Options Licensing Fee section of the
Amex Options FeeSchedule available at
https://www.amex.com.
5 As set forth in the Amex Options Fee Schedule,
P/A Orders and POrders are not subject to the
options marketing fee and the options cancellation
fee even though specialists and ROTs may be
subject to these fees for trades executed on the
Exchange. E-mail from Jeffrey P. Burns, Vice
President & Associate General Counsel, Amex to
David Liu, Assistant Director, Division of Market
Regulation, Commission dated July 18, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:31 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
Based on the experience to date, the
Exchange believes that an extension of
the pilot program for one year until July
31, 2008 is appropriate.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed fee change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 6
regarding an equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among its members and other persons
using Exchange facilities.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change will impose
no burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
40909
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR-Amex-2007–64 and should
be submitted on or before August 15,
2007.
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of the
Proposed Rule Change
III. Solicitation of Comments
After careful consideration, the
Interested persons are invited to
Commission finds that the proposed
submit written data, views, and
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
arguments concerning the foregoing,
and regulations thereunder applicable to
including whether the proposed rule
a national securities exchange,7 and, in
change is consistent with the Act.
particular, the requirements of Section
Comments may be submitted by any of
6(b) of the Act 8 and the rules and
the following methods:
regulations thereunder. The
Electronic Comments
Commission finds that the proposed
• Use the Commission’s Internet
rule change is consistent with Section
comment form
6(b)(4) of the Act,9 which requires that
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or the rules of the Exchange provide for the
• Send an e-mail to
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
fees, and other charges among its
File Number SR–Amex–2007–64 on the members and other persons using its
subject line.
facilities. The Commission believes that
the extension of the Linkage fee pilot
Paper Comments
until July 31, 2008 will give the
• Send paper comments in triplicate
Exchange and the Commission further
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
opportunity to evaluate whether such
Securities and Exchange Commission,
fees are appropriate.
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
The Commission also finds good
cause for approving the proposed rule
20549–1090.
change prior to the 30th day after the
All submissions should refer to File
date of publication of the notice of filing
Number SR–Amex–2007–64. This file
thereof in the Federal Register. The
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission believes that granting
accelerated approval of the proposed
Commission process and review your
rule change will preserve the
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will Exchange’s existing pilot program for
post all comments on the Commission’s Linkage fees without interruption as the
Exchange and the Commission continue
Internet Web site
considering the appropriateness of
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent Linkage fees. Therefore, the Commission
amendments, all written statements
7 In approving this rule change, the Commission
with respect to the proposed rule
notes that it hasconsidered the proposal’s impact on
change that are filed with the
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
Commission, and all written
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
PO 00000
8 15
6 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
9 15
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
25JYN1
40910
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Notices
finds good cause, consistent with
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,10
to approve the proposed rule change on
an accelerated basis.
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,11 that the
proposed rule change (SR–Amex–2007–
64), be and it hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–14358 Filed 7–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–56094; File No. SR–CBOE–
2007–80]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Extend Two Pilot
Programs Related to the Exchange’s
Automated Improvement Mechanism
Until July 18, 2008
July 18, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 13,
2007, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II below, which Items
have been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4 which renders
the proposed rule change effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
CBOE proposes to extend two pilot
programs related to the Exchange’s
10 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
11 15
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:31 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
Automated Improvement Mechanism
(‘‘AIM’’) for one year, until July 18,
2008. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site (https://www.cboe.com), at the
Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
In February 2006, CBOE obtained
approval of a filing adopting the AIM
auction process.5 AIM exposes certain
orders electronically to an auction
process to provide such orders with the
opportunity to receive an execution at
an improved price. The AIM auction is
available only for orders that an
Exchange member represents as agent
and for which a second order of the
same size as the ‘‘Agency Order’’ (and
on the opposite side of the market) is
also submitted (effectively stopping the
Agency Order at a given price).
Two components of AIM were
approved on a pilot basis: (1) That there
is no minimum size requirement for
orders to be eligible for the auction; and
(2) that the auction will conclude
prematurely anytime there is a quote
lock on the Exchange pursuant to
Exchange Rule 6.45A(d).6 In connection
with the pilot programs, the Exchange
has submitted to the Commission
reports providing detailed AIM auction
and order execution data. In July 2006,
the Exchange extended the pilot
program until July 18, 2007.7 The
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53222
(February 3, 2006), 71 FR7089 (February 10, 2006)
(approving SR–CBOE–2005–60).
6 That rule relates to situations where a MarketMaker’s quote interacts with the quote of another
CBOE Market-Maker (i.e. when internal quotes
lock).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54147
(July 14, 2006), 71 FR 41487 (July 21, 2006) (SR–
CBOE–2006–64).
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed rule change merely extends
the duration of the pilot programs until
July 18, 2008. Extending the pilots for
an additional year will allow the
Commission more time to consider the
impact of the pilot programs on AIM
order executions.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,8 in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,9 in particular, in that by allowing
the Commission additional time to
evaluate the AIM pilot programs, it
should serve to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and protect investors and the
public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 10 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 11
thereunder because the proposal does
not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) by its
terms, become operative for 30 days
from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission
may designate if consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest.12
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) normally may not
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(5).
10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
12 Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act requires the
Exchange to provide the Commission notice of the
Exchange’s intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the
proposed rule change, at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. See 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). The
Commission deems this requirement to have been
satisfied by the notice of intent filed by the
Exchange on July 10, 2007.
9 15
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40908-40910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14358]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-56102; File No. SR-Amex-2007-64]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to an Extension of the Linkage Fee Pilot Program
July 19, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 27, 2007, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange.
This order provides notice of the proposed rule change and approves the
proposed rule change on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend for one year, until July 31, 2008,
the current pilot program regarding transaction fees for trades
executed through the intermarket options linkage (the ``Linkage'') on
the Exchange. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the
Exchange, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and https://
www.amex.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
[[Page 40909]]
the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item III below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Amex proposes to extend for one year, until July 31, 2008, the
current pilot program establishing Exchange fees for Principal Orders
(``P Orders'') and Principal Acting As Agent Orders (``P/A Orders'')
submitted through the Linkage. The fees in connection with the pilot
program are scheduled to expire on July 31 2007.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54161 (July 17,
2006), 71 FR 42141 (July 25, 2006) (SR-Amex-2006-62).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The current fees applicable to P Orders and P/A Orders executed on
the Exchange are as follows: (i) $0.10 per contract side options
transaction fee for equity options, exchange traded fund share
(``ETF'') options, QQQQ options and trust issued receipt options; (ii)
$0.21 per contract side options transaction fee for index options
(including MNX and NDX options); (iii) $0.05 per contract side options
comparison fee; (iv) $0.05 per contract side options floor brokerage
fee; and (v) an options licensing fee for certain ETF and index option
products ranging from $0.15 per contract side to $0.05 per contract
side depending on the particular ETF or index option.\4\ These are the
same fees charged to specialists and registered option traders
(``ROTs'') for transactions executed on the Exchange.\5\ The Exchange
does not charge for the execution of Satisfaction Orders sent through
the Linkage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See the Options Licensing Fee section of the Amex Options
FeeSchedule available at https://www.amex.com.
\5\ As set forth in the Amex Options Fee Schedule, P/A Orders
and POrders are not subject to the options marketing fee and the
options cancellation fee even though specialists and ROTs may be
subject to these fees for trades executed on the Exchange. E-mail
from Jeffrey P. Burns, Vice President & Associate General Counsel,
Amex to David Liu, Assistant Director, Division of Market
Regulation, Commission dated July 18, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As was the case in the original pilot program and subsequent
extensions, the Exchange believes that the existing fees currently
charged to Exchange specialists and ROTs should also apply to
executions resulting from Linkage Orders.
Based on the experience to date, the Exchange believes that an
extension of the pilot program for one year until July 31, 2008 is
appropriate.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed fee change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the
Act \6\ regarding an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members and other persons using Exchange
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change will impose no burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Amex-2007-64 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2007-64. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2007-64 and should be
submitted on or before August 15, 2007.
IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
the Proposed Rule Change
After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange,\7\ and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of
the Act \8\ and the rules and regulations thereunder. The Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4)
of the Act,\9\ which requires that the rules of the Exchange provide
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among its members and other persons using its facilities. The
Commission believes that the extension of the Linkage fee pilot until
July 31, 2008 will give the Exchange and the Commission further
opportunity to evaluate whether such fees are appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ In approving this rule change, the Commission notes that it
hasconsidered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission also finds good cause for approving the proposed
rule change prior to the 30th day after the date of publication of the
notice of filing thereof in the Federal Register. The Commission
believes that granting accelerated approval of the proposed rule change
will preserve the Exchange's existing pilot program for Linkage fees
without interruption as the Exchange and the Commission continue
considering the appropriateness of Linkage fees. Therefore, the
Commission
[[Page 40910]]
finds good cause, consistent with Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange
Act,\10\ to approve the proposed rule change on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\11\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Amex-2007-64), be and it
hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-14358 Filed 7-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P