Request for Comments Concerning the Institution of a Section 751(b) Review Investigation; Certain Orange Juice From Brazil, 40896-40897 [E7-14346]

Download as PDF 40896 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Notices requirements established by section 120(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9620(h) (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1988, 100 Stat. 1670, notice is hereby given that the above-described lands have been examined and no evidence was found to indicate that any hazardous substances have been stored for one year or more, nor have any hazardous substances been disposed of or released on the subject property. Publication of this notice in the Federal Register temporarily segregates the above described land from appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws, but not the laws authorizing direct sales or airport leases, 43 U.S.C. 1713, 1732. The segregative effect of this notice will terminate in accordance with 43 CFR 2911.2–3(b) (airport lease) and 43 CFR 2711.1–2(d) (direct sale). Detailed information concerning the proposed lease/patent, including an environmental assessment and the approved appraisal report, is available for review at the BLM Las Vegas Field Office at the address above. The Field Manager, BLM, Las Vegas Field Office, will review the comments of all interested parties concerning the lease/ patent. To be considered, comments must be received at the BLM Las Vegas Field Office on or before the date stated above in this notice for that purpose. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Any adverse comments will be reviewed by the BLM, Nevada State Director. In the absence of any adverse comments, the decision will become effective on September 24, 2007. The lands will not be offered for lease/patent until after the decision becomes effective. rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES (Authority: 43 CFR 2711 and 2911) Dated: May 2, 2007. Mark R. Chatterton, Assistant Field Manager, Non-Renewable Resources, Las Vegas, Nevada. [FR Doc. E7–14338 Filed 7–24–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:31 Jul 24, 2007 Jkt 211001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Request for Comments Concerning the Institution of a Section 751(b) Review Investigation; Certain Orange Juice From Brazil United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Request for comments regarding the institution of a section 751(b) review investigation concerning the Commission’s affirmative determination in investigation No. 731–TA–1089 (Final), Certain Orange Juice from Brazil. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission invites comments from the public on whether changed circumstances exist sufficient to warrant the institution of an investigation pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(b)) (the Act) to review the Commission’s affirmative determination in investigation No. 731–TA–1089 (Final). The purpose of the proposed review investigation is to determine whether revocation of the existing antidumping duty order on imports of certain orange juice from Brazil is likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. See 19 U.S.C. 1675(b)(2)(A). Certain orange juice is provided for in subheadings 2009.11.00, 2009.12.25, and 2009.19.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. DATES: Effective Date: July 19, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Mazur (202–205–3184), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this matter may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background. On January 13, 2006, the Department of Commerce determined that imports of certain orange juice from Brazil were being sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) within the meaning of section 731 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673) (71 FR 2183, January 13, 2006); and on March 3, 2006 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the Commission determined, pursuant to section 735(b)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)(1)), that an industry in the United States was materially injured by reason of imports of such LTFV merchandise. Accordingly, Commerce ordered that antidumping duties be imposed on such imports (71 FR 12183, March 9, 2006). On June 13, 2007, the Commission received a request to review its affirmative determination in investigation No. 731–TA–1089 (Final) pursuant to section 751(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(b)). The request was filed by Tropicana Products, Inc. (Tropicana). Tropicana alleges that there is good cause for the Commission to conduct a review despite the statutory prohibition against conducting a review within two years of the publication of its injury determination (19 U.S.C. 1675(b)(4)). Tropicana alleges that shortfalls in the Florida juice orange crop and depleted inventories; significant price increases and a greatly constricted supply; and disruption of the alternative sources of Brazilian supply following imposition of the antidumping duty order have resulted in the domestic orange juice producers being harmed by the order. Written comments requested. Pursuant to section 207.45(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, the Commission requests comments concerning whether the alleged changed circumstances, brought about by shortfalls in the Florida juice orange crop and depleted inventories; significant price increases and a greatly constricted supply; and disruption of the alternative sources of Brazilian supply following imposition of the antidumping duty order are sufficient to warrant institution of a review investigation. Written submissions. Comments must be filed with the Secretary to the Commission no later than 60 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain business proprietary information must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Authority: This notice is published pursuant to section 207.45 of the Commission’s rules. E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM 25JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Notices Issued: July 20, 2007. By order of the Commission. William R. Bishop, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–14346 Filed 7–24–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act Notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2007, a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Dixie-Narco, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-1925–MBS, was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The proposed Consent Decree resolves the United States’ claims under Sections 106 and 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, for implementation of remedial action and recovery of response costs incurred and to be incurred by the United States at the Admiral Home Appliances Superfund Alternative Site located in Williston, Barnwell County, south Carolina. The Consent Decree requires Dixie-Narco, Inc., Maytag Corporation and Rheem Manufacturing Company to conduct remedial action at the Admiral Home Appliances site, pay EPS’s costs to oversee the work, and pay EPA’s remaining unreimbursed costs incurred at the site. The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication comments relating to the proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and either e-mailed to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov. or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, and should refer to United States v. Dixie-Narco, Inc., et al., D.J. Ref. 90–11–3–07761/1. The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United States Attorney, 1441 Main Street, Suite 500, Columbia, SC 29201, and at U.S. EPA Region IV, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, GA 30303. During the public comment period, the proposed Consent Decree may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:31 Jul 24, 2007 Jkt 211001 Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $58.25 for the Consent Decree plus Appendices or $13 for the Consent Decree without Appendices (25 cents per page reproduction cost), payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, forward a check in that amount to the Consent Decree Library at the stated address. Henry S. Friedman, Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 07–3642 Filed 7–24–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Public Comment Period for Proposed Environmental Consent Decree Under 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that, for a period of 30 days, the United States will receive public comments on a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Equistar Chemicals, LP (‘‘Equistar’’) (Civil Action No. 1:07–CF–4045), which was lodged with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on July 18, 2007. This proposed Consent Decree was lodged simultaneously with the Compliant in this multi-facility, multimedia case covering seven of Equistar’s petrochemical plants in four states. Our complaint alleges claims pursuant to Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’), 42 U.S.C. 7401– 7671q; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (‘‘RCRA’’), 42 U.S.C. 6901–6992k; the Clean Water Act (‘‘CWA’’), 33 U.S.C. 1251–1387; the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (‘‘EPCRA’’), 42 U.S.C. 11001–11050; and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601–9675. Under the settlement, Equistar will take immediate action to correct the regulatory violations identified and will implement enhancements to its air, water and hazardous waste programs at all 7 facilities to address deficiencies across the board. Equistar will also install a waste water treatment plant at the Channelview, Texas, facility as part of an injunctive relief project to eliminate the land disposal of 150,000 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 40897 tons of benzene hazardous waste per year. The estimated cost to Equistar of implementing all the Consent Decree requirements is $125 million. In addition, Equistar will pay a civil penalty of $2.5 million and spend $6,560,000 on Federal and state Supplemental Environmental Projects (‘‘SPEs’’). The federal SEP project will control an estimated 26 tons per year of hazardous air emissions from process vents at Channelview. The state environmental projects include: (1) The purchase of emergency response equipment and newer, cleaner school buses; (2) funding for the Mississippi River Eco Tourism Center; and (3) hazardous waste cleanup activities in the wake of hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The states of Iowa, Illinois, and Louisiana have joined in the settlement, will each file Complaints-inIntervention and receive a $178,600 share of the civil penalty. Comments should be addressed to the Acting Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and may be submitted to: P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, or via e-mail to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov, and should refer to United States v. Equistar Chemicals, LP, D.J. Ref. 90–5–2–1–08012/1. The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United States Attorney, Northern District of Illinois, 219 S. Dearborn Street, Fifth Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. During the public comment period the Equistar consent Decree may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ ConsentlDecrees.html. A copy of the Equistar Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov, fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $37.50 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury. Bruce S. Gelber, Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 07–3612 Filed 7–24–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–M E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM 25JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40896-40897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14346]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION


Request for Comments Concerning the Institution of a Section 
751(b) Review Investigation; Certain Orange Juice From Brazil

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Request for comments regarding the institution of a section 
751(b) review investigation concerning the Commission's affirmative 
determination in investigation No. 731-TA-1089 (Final), Certain Orange 
Juice from Brazil.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission invites comments from the public on whether 
changed circumstances exist sufficient to warrant the institution of an 
investigation pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(b)) (the Act) to review the Commission's affirmative 
determination in investigation No. 731-TA-1089 (Final). The purpose of 
the proposed review investigation is to determine whether revocation of 
the existing antidumping duty order on imports of certain orange juice 
from Brazil is likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material 
injury. See 19 U.S.C. 1675(b)(2)(A). Certain orange juice is provided 
for in subheadings 2009.11.00, 2009.12.25, and 2009.19.00 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.

DATES: Effective Date: July 19, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Mazur (202-205-3184), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information 
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special 
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the 
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning 
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server 
(http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this matter may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background. On January 13, 2006, the Department of Commerce 
determined that imports of certain orange juice from Brazil were being 
sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) within the 
meaning of section 731 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673) (71 FR 2183, January 
13, 2006); and on March 3, 2006 the Commission determined, pursuant to 
section 735(b)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)(1)), that an industry 
in the United States was materially injured by reason of imports of 
such LTFV merchandise. Accordingly, Commerce ordered that antidumping 
duties be imposed on such imports (71 FR 12183, March 9, 2006).
    On June 13, 2007, the Commission received a request to review its 
affirmative determination in investigation No. 731-TA-1089 (Final) 
pursuant to section 751(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(b)). The request 
was filed by Tropicana Products, Inc. (Tropicana). Tropicana alleges 
that there is good cause for the Commission to conduct a review despite 
the statutory prohibition against conducting a review within two years 
of the publication of its injury determination (19 U.S.C. 1675(b)(4)). 
Tropicana alleges that shortfalls in the Florida juice orange crop and 
depleted inventories; significant price increases and a greatly 
constricted supply; and disruption of the alternative sources of 
Brazilian supply following imposition of the antidumping duty order 
have resulted in the domestic orange juice producers being harmed by 
the order.
    Written comments requested. Pursuant to section 207.45(b) of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, the Commission requests 
comments concerning whether the alleged changed circumstances, brought 
about by shortfalls in the Florida juice orange crop and depleted 
inventories; significant price increases and a greatly constricted 
supply; and disruption of the alternative sources of Brazilian supply 
following imposition of the antidumping duty order are sufficient to 
warrant institution of a review investigation.
    Written submissions. Comments must be filed with the Secretary to 
the Commission no later than 60 days after the date of publication of 
this notice in the Federal Register. All written submissions must 
conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission's rules; 
any submissions that contain business proprietary information must also 
conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of 
the Commission's rules. The Commission's rules do not authorize filing 
of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, 
except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission's 
rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002).

    Authority: This notice is published pursuant to section 207.45 
of the Commission's rules.


[[Page 40897]]


    Issued: July 20, 2007.

    By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E7-14346 Filed 7-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P