Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 38837-38839 [E7-13714]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
38837
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 135 / Monday, July 16, 2007 / Notices
manuscript submitted to the Journal of
Clinical Investigation entitled: ‘‘Akt1
promotes physiologic, but antagonizes
pathologic, cardiac growth.’’
• Figures 3A, 3C, and 4A in: Welsh,
C.F., Roovers, K., Villanueva, J., Liu, Y.,
Schwartz, M.A., & Assoian, R.K.
‘‘Timing of cyclin D1 expression within
G1 phase is controlled by Rho.’’ Nature
Cell Biology 3(11):950–957, 2001.
• Figures 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3C, 4A, 4B,
6C, 6D, and 6E in: Roovers, K., &
Assoian, R.K. ‘‘Effects of rho kinase and
actin stress fibers on sustained
extracellular signal-regulated kinase
activity and activation of G(1) phase
cyclin-dependent kinases.’’ Mol. Cell
Biol. 23(12):4283–4294, 2003. Retracted
in Mol. Cell Biol. 26(13):5203, July 2006.
• Figures 1C, 2C, 5B, 5D, 6B and 6D
in: Roovers, K., Klein, E.A., Castagnino,
P., & Assoian, R.K. ‘‘Nuclear
translocation of LIM kinase mediates
Rho-Rho kinase regulation of cyclin D1
expression.’’ Developmental Cell 5
(2):273–284, 2003. Retracted in
Developmental Cell 10(5):681, May
2006.
Corrections were recommended by UP
for the Nature Cell Biology paper.
Dr. Roovers’ falsified Western blot
data from the publications in Nature
Cell Biology and from Developmental
Cell were included in NIH grant
applications CA 72639–07 and GM
69064–01.
ORI has implemented the following
administrative actions for a period of
five (5) years, beginning on June 7, 2007:
(1) Dr. Roovers is debarred from
eligibility for any contracting or
subcontracting with any agency of the
United States Government and from
eligibility or involvement in
nonprocurement programs of the United
States Government referred to as
‘‘covered transactions’’ as defined in
HHS’ implementation of OMB
Guidelines to Agencies on
Governmentwide Debarment and
Suspension at 2 CFR part 376, et seq.;
and
(2) Dr. Roovers is prohibited from
serving in any advisory capacity to PHS,
including but not limited to service on
any PHS advisory committee, board,
and/or peer review committee, or as a
consultant.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director, Division of Investigative
Oversight, Office of Research Integrity,
1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 750,
Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 453–8800.
Chris B. Pascal,
Director, Office of Research Integrity.
[FR Doc. E7–13703 Filed 7–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–07–06BM]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork;
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of
information collection requests under
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance
Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an email to: omb@cdc.gov. Send written
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC or by fax to (202) 395–6974.
Notice of Correction
Title of Project
Randomized Controlled Trial of
Routine Screening for Intimate Partner
Violence—New—National Center for
Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC),
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC).
Description of Correction
A 30-day Federal Register Notice was
published on June 25, 2007 (Vol. 72, No.
121, pp. 34691–34692) describing
proposed activities with total estimated
annualized burden of 717.7 hours. The
annualized total burden hour estimate is
correct, however, due to a clerical
oversight, the table of Estimated
Annualized Burden Hours contained
non-annualized figures for the Number
of Respondents (i.e., project totals). The
corrected table appears below. The total
estimated annualized burden hours are
717.7.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents
Form name
Women Seeking Health Care Services ..........
Eligibility Script for Pretest .............................
Baseline Questionnaire for Pretest ................
Follow-up Questionnaire Pretest ....................
Eligibility Script for Main Study ......................
Baseline Questionnaire for Main Study .........
Follow-up Questionnaire Main Study .............
70
65
59
1,533
1,227
860
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden
per response
(in hours)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1/60
15/60
12/60
1/60
17/60
22/60
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
Dated: July 9, 2007.
Maryam I. Daneshvar,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7–13730 Filed 7–13–07; 8:45 am]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
Project: National Evaluation of the
Protection and Advocacy for
Individuals with Mental Illness
(PAIMI) Program—NEW
In recognition that systematic
evaluation of this and other government
programs are part of good management
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Jul 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
OMB review, in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
38838
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 135 / Monday, July 16, 2007 / Notices
and accountability, the Substance Abuse
and Mental Health Services
Administration’s Center for Mental
Health Services (CMHS) will conduct an
independent process evaluation of the
PAIMI Program. CMHS will employ
information that is routinely collected
under existing program requirements
and is also expected to collect new,
additional data that are also necessary
for the conduct of the evaluation. [On
January 1, each eligible State protection
and advocacy (P&A) system is required
to transmit to the Secretary and head of
the State Mental Health Agency, in
which the system is located, a report
describing its activities,
accomplishments, and expenditures
during the most recently completed
fiscal year. None of the data collection
activities described above will be
redundant with these existing reporting
requirements.] The evaluation plan
includes gathering information about
the PAIMI program from persons with
different perspectives. Accordingly,
CMHS proposes to proceed with the
following new data collection activities:
(1) Survey interviews with the
Executive Directors of each of the
Protection and Advocacy Grantees, as
well as other staff whom they may ask
to join them in these interviews to
include:
a. Characteristics and shared
functions between the P&A Governing
Board and the PAIMI Advisory Council.
b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals
and priorities.
c. Federal support of the PAIMI
program.
d. Federal oversight of the PAIMI
program.
e. Organization and staffing of PAIMI
responsibilities within the P&A.
f. Procedures for quality management.
g. Background of respondent.
(2) Surveys of and focus groups with
persons who receive services from
PAIMI programs to include:
a. Access to PAIMI services.
b. Quality of services provided to
clients.
c. Satisfaction with services.
d. Background of respondent.
(3) Surveys of the Chairs of the
Advisory Councils of each PAIMI
Grantee to include:
a. Characteristics and shared
functions between the P&A Governing
Board and the PAIMI Advisory Council.
b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals
and priorities and assessment of those
priorities.
c. Organization and staffing of PAIMI
responsibilities within the P&A.
d. Quality of services provided to
clients.
e. Background of respondent.
(4) Surveys of the Program Directors
of State Mental Health Authorities to
include:
a. Types of communication between
the State Mental Health Authority and
the PAIMI program.
b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals
and priorities and assessment of those
priorities.
c. Relationship between the State
Mental Health Authority and the PAIMI
program.
d. Role of the PAIMI program in the
mental health advocacy community.
e. Background of respondent.
(5) Survey of directors of other
organizations who are likely to be
familiar with or collaborate in PAIMI
activities in each State; including family
and consumer groups and other mental
health advocacy organizations to
include:
a. Types of interaction between the
State Mental Health Authority and the
PAIMI program.
b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals
and priorities and assessment of those
priorities.
c. Relationship between the
organization and the PAIMI program.
No. of respondents
Form name
Responses
per
respondent
d. Access to and quality of services
provided to PAIMI recipients.
e. Role of the PAIMI program in the
mental health advocacy community.
f. Background of respondent.
The PAIMI program has never
undergone an independent evaluation.
The approach being used is to conduct
survey interviews with a cross-section
of five primary Stakeholder groups
connected to the PAIMI program,
including Program Directors/staff,
Clients/Recipients of services, PAIMI
Advisory Council Chairs, Directors of
State Mental Health Authorities, and
Directors of Other Mental Health
Advocacy Organizations in an effort to
obtain a representative sample of
viewpoints about the PAIMI program.
The surveys have been developed to
include questions relevant to each of the
respective Stakeholder groups named
above and range from 22 questions to as
many as 88 questions. Depending on the
Stakeholder group, respondent surveys
are expected to take from thirty minutes
up to two hours to complete.
CMHS also intends to conduct an
outcome evaluation of the PAIMI
program. SAMHSA is soliciting
comments on how best to conduct such
an evaluation. Comments should
address how an evaluation can be best
designed to assess the impact of the
program, as measured by its GPRA
measures, SAMHSA’s National
Outcome Measures, and other outcome
measures. Commenters are advised to
refer to the OMB document ‘‘What
Constitutes Strong Evidence of a
Program’s Effectiveness?’’, available at
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part/
index.html, for OMB guidance on
program evaluations.
The burden estimate for conducting
the surveys under the evaluation plan
for the PAIMI Program is as follows:
Total
responses
Hours per
response
(hours)
Total hour
burden
(hours)
20
20
20
20
20
72
1
1
1
1
1
1
20
20
20
20
20
72
2
1
1
1
1
1⁄2
40
20
20
20
20
36
Total .....................................................................................
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
Executive Director Interview ................................................
PAIMI Advisory Chair Survey ..............................................
State Mental Health Director Survey ...................................
State Mental Health Legal Counsel .....................................
Other Mental Health Advocacy Org Director Survey ..........
PAIMI Client Survey .............................................................
172
........................
172
........................
156
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by August 15, 2007 to: SAMHSA
Desk Officer, Human Resources and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Jul 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Housing Branch, Office of Management
and Budget, New Executive Office
Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503; due to potential delays in OMB’s
receipt and processing of mail sent
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
through the U.S. Postal Service,
respondents are encouraged to submit
comments by fax to: 202–395–6974.
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 135 / Monday, July 16, 2007 / Notices
Dated: June 25, 2007.
Elaine Parry,
Acting Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E7–13714 Filed 7–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[USCG–2007–28578]
Collection of Information Under
Review by Office of Management and
Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625–
0089
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Request for comments.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an
Information Collection Request (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) requesting re-instatement, with
change, of a previously-approved
collection of information: 1625–0089,
National Recreational Boating Survey.
Before submitting this ICR to OMB, the
Coast Guard is inviting comments as
described below.
DATES: Comments must reach the Coast
Guard on or before September 14, 2007.
ADDRESSES: To make sure your
comments and related material do not
enter the docket [USCG–2007–28578]
more than once, please submit them by
only one of the following means:
(1) By mail to the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
(2) By delivery to room W12–140 at
the address given in paragraph (1)(a)
above, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The telephone number is (202)
366–9329.
(3) By fax to the Facility at (202) 493–
2298.
(4) Electronically through the Web
site for the Docket Management System
(DMS) at: https://dms.dot.gov.
The Docket Management Facility
maintains the public docket for this
notice. Comments and material received
from the public, as well as documents
mentioned in this notice as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at room W12–140
on the West Building Ground Floor
level, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:50 Jul 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. You may also find this
docket on the Internet at: https://
dms.dot.gov.
Copies of the complete ICR are
available through this docket on the
Internet at: https://dms.dot.gov, and also
from Commandant (CG–611), U.S. Coast
Guard Headquarters, room 10–1236
(Attn: Mr. Arthur Requina), 2100 2nd
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593–
0001. The telephone number is 202–
475–3523.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Arthur Requina, Office of Information
Management, telephone 202–475–3523,
or fax 202–475–3929, for questions on
these documents; or telephone Ms.
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, 202–366–9826, for
questions on the docket.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to respond to this
request by submitting comments and
related materials. We will post all
comments received, without change, to
https://dms.dot.gov; they will include
any personal information you provided.
We have an agreement with DOT to use
the Docket Management Facility. Please
see the paragraph on DOT’s ‘‘Privacy
Act Policy’’ below.
Submitting comments: If you submit a
comment, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number
[USCG–2007–28578], indicate the
specific section of the document to
which each comment applies, providing
a reason for each comment. You may
submit your comments and material by
electronic means, mail, fax, or delivery
to the Docket Management Facility at
the address under ADDRESSES; but
please submit them by only one means.
If you submit them by mail or delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you
submit them by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period. We may
change the documents supporting this
collection of information or even the
underlying requirements in view of
them.
Viewing comments and documents:
Go to https://dms.dot.gov to view
comments and documents mentioned in
this notice as being available in the
docket. Conduct a simple search using
the docket number. You may also visit
the Docket Management Facility in
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38839
room W12–140 on the West Building
Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the
electronic form of all comments
received in dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review the
Privacy Act Statement of DOT in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000, (65 FR 19477), or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
Information Collection Request
Title: National Recreational Boating
Survey.
OMB Control Number: 1625–0089.
Summary: The Coast Guard National
Recreational Boating Survey collects
data on recreational boating
participation and exposure to hazards.
The goal is for the Office of Boating
Safety to draw a general statistical
profile of the U.S. recreational boating
population. Of particular importance
will be statistics on the type of boats
used, the activities these boats are used
for, boat operators’ knowledge of safety
measures, and the duration of a typical
boating day (referred to as ‘‘exposure’’).
Exposure data will be used to derive a
reliable measure of the risk associated
with recreational boating that can be
used in all jurisdictions.
Need: The Federal Boat Safety Act of
1971 determines the framework of the
Coast Guard recreational boating safety
program. This program as set forth in 46
U.S.C., Chapter 131, requires the Coast
Guard to ‘‘encourage greater State
participation and uniformity in boating
safety efforts, and particularly to permit
the States to assume a greater share of
boating safety education, assistance, and
enforcement activities.’’ See 46 U.S.C.
13102. The Coast Guard Office of
Boating Safety achieves these goals by
providing timely and relevant
information on boating activities that
occur in each respective jurisdiction.
The boating information provided by
the Coast Guard enables each State
agency to tailor and implement safety
initiatives addressing specific needs of
boaters in local jurisdictions. The
primary objective of this collection is to
provide the Coast Guard with the
required information in a format
suitable to effectively manage the
program.
Respondents: Recreational boating
participants and owners of recreational
vessels.
Frequency: Every 2 years.
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 135 (Monday, July 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38837-38839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-13714]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information
collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Project: National Evaluation of the Protection and Advocacy for
Individuals with Mental Illness (PAIMI) Program--NEW
In recognition that systematic evaluation of this and other
government programs are part of good management
[[Page 38838]]
and accountability, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration's Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) will conduct
an independent process evaluation of the PAIMI Program. CMHS will
employ information that is routinely collected under existing program
requirements and is also expected to collect new, additional data that
are also necessary for the conduct of the evaluation. [On January 1,
each eligible State protection and advocacy (P&A) system is required to
transmit to the Secretary and head of the State Mental Health Agency,
in which the system is located, a report describing its activities,
accomplishments, and expenditures during the most recently completed
fiscal year. None of the data collection activities described above
will be redundant with these existing reporting requirements.] The
evaluation plan includes gathering information about the PAIMI program
from persons with different perspectives. Accordingly, CMHS proposes to
proceed with the following new data collection activities:
(1) Survey interviews with the Executive Directors of each of the
Protection and Advocacy Grantees, as well as other staff whom they may
ask to join them in these interviews to include:
a. Characteristics and shared functions between the P&A Governing
Board and the PAIMI Advisory Council.
b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals and priorities.
c. Federal support of the PAIMI program.
d. Federal oversight of the PAIMI program.
e. Organization and staffing of PAIMI responsibilities within the
P&A.
f. Procedures for quality management.
g. Background of respondent.
(2) Surveys of and focus groups with persons who receive services
from PAIMI programs to include:
a. Access to PAIMI services.
b. Quality of services provided to clients.
c. Satisfaction with services.
d. Background of respondent.
(3) Surveys of the Chairs of the Advisory Councils of each PAIMI
Grantee to include:
a. Characteristics and shared functions between the P&A Governing
Board and the PAIMI Advisory Council.
b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals and priorities and assessment
of those priorities.
c. Organization and staffing of PAIMI responsibilities within the
P&A.
d. Quality of services provided to clients.
e. Background of respondent.
(4) Surveys of the Program Directors of State Mental Health
Authorities to include:
a. Types of communication between the State Mental Health Authority
and the PAIMI program.
b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals and priorities and assessment
of those priorities.
c. Relationship between the State Mental Health Authority and the
PAIMI program.
d. Role of the PAIMI program in the mental health advocacy
community.
e. Background of respondent.
(5) Survey of directors of other organizations who are likely to be
familiar with or collaborate in PAIMI activities in each State;
including family and consumer groups and other mental health advocacy
organizations to include:
a. Types of interaction between the State Mental Health Authority
and the PAIMI program.
b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals and priorities and assessment
of those priorities.
c. Relationship between the organization and the PAIMI program.
d. Access to and quality of services provided to PAIMI recipients.
e. Role of the PAIMI program in the mental health advocacy
community.
f. Background of respondent.
The PAIMI program has never undergone an independent evaluation.
The approach being used is to conduct survey interviews with a cross-
section of five primary Stakeholder groups connected to the PAIMI
program, including Program Directors/staff, Clients/Recipients of
services, PAIMI Advisory Council Chairs, Directors of State Mental
Health Authorities, and Directors of Other Mental Health Advocacy
Organizations in an effort to obtain a representative sample of
viewpoints about the PAIMI program. The surveys have been developed to
include questions relevant to each of the respective Stakeholder groups
named above and range from 22 questions to as many as 88 questions.
Depending on the Stakeholder group, respondent surveys are expected to
take from thirty minutes up to two hours to complete.
CMHS also intends to conduct an outcome evaluation of the PAIMI
program. SAMHSA is soliciting comments on how best to conduct such an
evaluation. Comments should address how an evaluation can be best
designed to assess the impact of the program, as measured by its GPRA
measures, SAMHSA's National Outcome Measures, and other outcome
measures. Commenters are advised to refer to the OMB document ``What
Constitutes Strong Evidence of a Program's Effectiveness?'', available
at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part/, for OMB guidance on
program evaluations.
The burden estimate for conducting the surveys under the evaluation
plan for the PAIMI Program is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hours per Total hour
Form name No. of Responses per Total response burden
respondents respondent responses (hours) (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Executive Director Interview.... 20 1 20 2 40
PAIMI Advisory Chair Survey..... 20 1 20 1 20
State Mental Health Director 20 1 20 1 20
Survey.........................
State Mental Health Legal 20 1 20 1 20
Counsel........................
Other Mental Health Advocacy Org 20 1 20 1 20
Director Survey................
PAIMI Client Survey............. 72 1 72 \1/2\ 36
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................... 172 .............. 172 .............. 156
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed
information collection should be sent by August 15, 2007 to: SAMHSA
Desk Officer, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management
and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503; due to potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of mail
sent through the U.S. Postal Service, respondents are encouraged to
submit comments by fax to: 202-395-6974.
[[Page 38839]]
Dated: June 25, 2007.
Elaine Parry,
Acting Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E7-13714 Filed 7-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
