Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 38837-38839 [E7-13714]

Download as PDF 38837 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 135 / Monday, July 16, 2007 / Notices manuscript submitted to the Journal of Clinical Investigation entitled: ‘‘Akt1 promotes physiologic, but antagonizes pathologic, cardiac growth.’’ • Figures 3A, 3C, and 4A in: Welsh, C.F., Roovers, K., Villanueva, J., Liu, Y., Schwartz, M.A., & Assoian, R.K. ‘‘Timing of cyclin D1 expression within G1 phase is controlled by Rho.’’ Nature Cell Biology 3(11):950–957, 2001. • Figures 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3C, 4A, 4B, 6C, 6D, and 6E in: Roovers, K., & Assoian, R.K. ‘‘Effects of rho kinase and actin stress fibers on sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activity and activation of G(1) phase cyclin-dependent kinases.’’ Mol. Cell Biol. 23(12):4283–4294, 2003. Retracted in Mol. Cell Biol. 26(13):5203, July 2006. • Figures 1C, 2C, 5B, 5D, 6B and 6D in: Roovers, K., Klein, E.A., Castagnino, P., & Assoian, R.K. ‘‘Nuclear translocation of LIM kinase mediates Rho-Rho kinase regulation of cyclin D1 expression.’’ Developmental Cell 5 (2):273–284, 2003. Retracted in Developmental Cell 10(5):681, May 2006. Corrections were recommended by UP for the Nature Cell Biology paper. Dr. Roovers’ falsified Western blot data from the publications in Nature Cell Biology and from Developmental Cell were included in NIH grant applications CA 72639–07 and GM 69064–01. ORI has implemented the following administrative actions for a period of five (5) years, beginning on June 7, 2007: (1) Dr. Roovers is debarred from eligibility for any contracting or subcontracting with any agency of the United States Government and from eligibility or involvement in nonprocurement programs of the United States Government referred to as ‘‘covered transactions’’ as defined in HHS’ implementation of OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension at 2 CFR part 376, et seq.; and (2) Dr. Roovers is prohibited from serving in any advisory capacity to PHS, including but not limited to service on any PHS advisory committee, board, and/or peer review committee, or as a consultant. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Division of Investigative Oversight, Office of Research Integrity, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 750, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 453–8800. Chris B. Pascal, Director, Office of Research Integrity. [FR Doc. E7–13703 Filed 7–13–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4150–31–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [30Day–07–06BM] Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork; Reduction Act Review The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an email to: omb@cdc.gov. Send written comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC or by fax to (202) 395–6974. Notice of Correction Title of Project Randomized Controlled Trial of Routine Screening for Intimate Partner Violence—New—National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Description of Correction A 30-day Federal Register Notice was published on June 25, 2007 (Vol. 72, No. 121, pp. 34691–34692) describing proposed activities with total estimated annualized burden of 717.7 hours. The annualized total burden hour estimate is correct, however, due to a clerical oversight, the table of Estimated Annualized Burden Hours contained non-annualized figures for the Number of Respondents (i.e., project totals). The corrected table appears below. The total estimated annualized burden hours are 717.7. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Number of respondents Type of respondents Form name Women Seeking Health Care Services .......... Eligibility Script for Pretest ............................. Baseline Questionnaire for Pretest ................ Follow-up Questionnaire Pretest .................... Eligibility Script for Main Study ...................... Baseline Questionnaire for Main Study ......... Follow-up Questionnaire Main Study ............. 70 65 59 1,533 1,227 860 Number of responses per respondent Average burden per response (in hours) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/60 15/60 12/60 1/60 17/60 22/60 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES BILLING CODE 4163–18–P hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES Dated: July 9, 2007. Maryam I. Daneshvar, Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. E7–13730 Filed 7–13–07; 8:45 am] Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information collection requests under Project: National Evaluation of the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness (PAIMI) Program—NEW In recognition that systematic evaluation of this and other government programs are part of good management VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:59 Jul 13, 2007 Jkt 211001 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243. E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM 16JYN1 38838 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 135 / Monday, July 16, 2007 / Notices and accountability, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) will conduct an independent process evaluation of the PAIMI Program. CMHS will employ information that is routinely collected under existing program requirements and is also expected to collect new, additional data that are also necessary for the conduct of the evaluation. [On January 1, each eligible State protection and advocacy (P&A) system is required to transmit to the Secretary and head of the State Mental Health Agency, in which the system is located, a report describing its activities, accomplishments, and expenditures during the most recently completed fiscal year. None of the data collection activities described above will be redundant with these existing reporting requirements.] The evaluation plan includes gathering information about the PAIMI program from persons with different perspectives. Accordingly, CMHS proposes to proceed with the following new data collection activities: (1) Survey interviews with the Executive Directors of each of the Protection and Advocacy Grantees, as well as other staff whom they may ask to join them in these interviews to include: a. Characteristics and shared functions between the P&A Governing Board and the PAIMI Advisory Council. b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals and priorities. c. Federal support of the PAIMI program. d. Federal oversight of the PAIMI program. e. Organization and staffing of PAIMI responsibilities within the P&A. f. Procedures for quality management. g. Background of respondent. (2) Surveys of and focus groups with persons who receive services from PAIMI programs to include: a. Access to PAIMI services. b. Quality of services provided to clients. c. Satisfaction with services. d. Background of respondent. (3) Surveys of the Chairs of the Advisory Councils of each PAIMI Grantee to include: a. Characteristics and shared functions between the P&A Governing Board and the PAIMI Advisory Council. b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals and priorities and assessment of those priorities. c. Organization and staffing of PAIMI responsibilities within the P&A. d. Quality of services provided to clients. e. Background of respondent. (4) Surveys of the Program Directors of State Mental Health Authorities to include: a. Types of communication between the State Mental Health Authority and the PAIMI program. b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals and priorities and assessment of those priorities. c. Relationship between the State Mental Health Authority and the PAIMI program. d. Role of the PAIMI program in the mental health advocacy community. e. Background of respondent. (5) Survey of directors of other organizations who are likely to be familiar with or collaborate in PAIMI activities in each State; including family and consumer groups and other mental health advocacy organizations to include: a. Types of interaction between the State Mental Health Authority and the PAIMI program. b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals and priorities and assessment of those priorities. c. Relationship between the organization and the PAIMI program. No. of respondents Form name Responses per respondent d. Access to and quality of services provided to PAIMI recipients. e. Role of the PAIMI program in the mental health advocacy community. f. Background of respondent. The PAIMI program has never undergone an independent evaluation. The approach being used is to conduct survey interviews with a cross-section of five primary Stakeholder groups connected to the PAIMI program, including Program Directors/staff, Clients/Recipients of services, PAIMI Advisory Council Chairs, Directors of State Mental Health Authorities, and Directors of Other Mental Health Advocacy Organizations in an effort to obtain a representative sample of viewpoints about the PAIMI program. The surveys have been developed to include questions relevant to each of the respective Stakeholder groups named above and range from 22 questions to as many as 88 questions. Depending on the Stakeholder group, respondent surveys are expected to take from thirty minutes up to two hours to complete. CMHS also intends to conduct an outcome evaluation of the PAIMI program. SAMHSA is soliciting comments on how best to conduct such an evaluation. Comments should address how an evaluation can be best designed to assess the impact of the program, as measured by its GPRA measures, SAMHSA’s National Outcome Measures, and other outcome measures. Commenters are advised to refer to the OMB document ‘‘What Constitutes Strong Evidence of a Program’s Effectiveness?’’, available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part/ index.html, for OMB guidance on program evaluations. The burden estimate for conducting the surveys under the evaluation plan for the PAIMI Program is as follows: Total responses Hours per response (hours) Total hour burden (hours) 20 20 20 20 20 72 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 20 20 20 20 72 2 1 1 1 1 1⁄2 40 20 20 20 20 36 Total ..................................................................................... hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES Executive Director Interview ................................................ PAIMI Advisory Chair Survey .............................................. State Mental Health Director Survey ................................... State Mental Health Legal Counsel ..................................... Other Mental Health Advocacy Org Director Survey .......... PAIMI Client Survey ............................................................. 172 ........................ 172 ........................ 156 Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed information collection should be sent by August 15, 2007 to: SAMHSA Desk Officer, Human Resources and VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:59 Jul 13, 2007 Jkt 211001 Housing Branch, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; due to potential delays in OMB’s receipt and processing of mail sent PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 through the U.S. Postal Service, respondents are encouraged to submit comments by fax to: 202–395–6974. E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM 16JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 135 / Monday, July 16, 2007 / Notices Dated: June 25, 2007. Elaine Parry, Acting Director, Office of Program Services. [FR Doc. E7–13714 Filed 7–13–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4162–20–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard [USCG–2007–28578] Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management and Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625– 0089 Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Request for comments. hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requesting re-instatement, with change, of a previously-approved collection of information: 1625–0089, National Recreational Boating Survey. Before submitting this ICR to OMB, the Coast Guard is inviting comments as described below. DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before September 14, 2007. ADDRESSES: To make sure your comments and related material do not enter the docket [USCG–2007–28578] more than once, please submit them by only one of the following means: (1) By mail to the Docket Management Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. (2) By delivery to room W12–140 at the address given in paragraph (1)(a) above, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is (202) 366–9329. (3) By fax to the Facility at (202) 493– 2298. (4) Electronically through the Web site for the Docket Management System (DMS) at: http://dms.dot.gov. The Docket Management Facility maintains the public docket for this notice. Comments and material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in this notice as being available in the docket, will become part of this docket and will be available for inspection or copying at room W12–140 on the West Building Ground Floor level, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:50 Jul 13, 2007 Jkt 211001 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this docket on the Internet at: http:// dms.dot.gov. Copies of the complete ICR are available through this docket on the Internet at: http://dms.dot.gov, and also from Commandant (CG–611), U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, room 10–1236 (Attn: Mr. Arthur Requina), 2100 2nd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593– 0001. The telephone number is 202– 475–3523. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Arthur Requina, Office of Information Management, telephone 202–475–3523, or fax 202–475–3929, for questions on these documents; or telephone Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, 202–366–9826, for questions on the docket. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Participation and Request for Comments We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments and related materials. We will post all comments received, without change, to http://dms.dot.gov; they will include any personal information you provided. We have an agreement with DOT to use the Docket Management Facility. Please see the paragraph on DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act Policy’’ below. Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include your name and address, identify the docket number [USCG–2007–28578], indicate the specific section of the document to which each comment applies, providing a reason for each comment. You may submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail, fax, or delivery to the Docket Management Facility at the address under ADDRESSES; but please submit them by only one means. If you submit them by mail or delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. We may change the documents supporting this collection of information or even the underlying requirements in view of them. Viewing comments and documents: Go to http://dms.dot.gov to view comments and documents mentioned in this notice as being available in the docket. Conduct a simple search using the docket number. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38839 room W12–140 on the West Building Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received in dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Privacy Act Statement of DOT in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477), or you may visit http://dms.dot.gov. Information Collection Request Title: National Recreational Boating Survey. OMB Control Number: 1625–0089. Summary: The Coast Guard National Recreational Boating Survey collects data on recreational boating participation and exposure to hazards. The goal is for the Office of Boating Safety to draw a general statistical profile of the U.S. recreational boating population. Of particular importance will be statistics on the type of boats used, the activities these boats are used for, boat operators’ knowledge of safety measures, and the duration of a typical boating day (referred to as ‘‘exposure’’). Exposure data will be used to derive a reliable measure of the risk associated with recreational boating that can be used in all jurisdictions. Need: The Federal Boat Safety Act of 1971 determines the framework of the Coast Guard recreational boating safety program. This program as set forth in 46 U.S.C., Chapter 131, requires the Coast Guard to ‘‘encourage greater State participation and uniformity in boating safety efforts, and particularly to permit the States to assume a greater share of boating safety education, assistance, and enforcement activities.’’ See 46 U.S.C. 13102. The Coast Guard Office of Boating Safety achieves these goals by providing timely and relevant information on boating activities that occur in each respective jurisdiction. The boating information provided by the Coast Guard enables each State agency to tailor and implement safety initiatives addressing specific needs of boaters in local jurisdictions. The primary objective of this collection is to provide the Coast Guard with the required information in a format suitable to effectively manage the program. Respondents: Recreational boating participants and owners of recreational vessels. Frequency: Every 2 years. E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM 16JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 135 (Monday, July 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38837-38839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-13714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

    Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information 
collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these 
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.

Project: National Evaluation of the Protection and Advocacy for 
Individuals with Mental Illness (PAIMI) Program--NEW

    In recognition that systematic evaluation of this and other 
government programs are part of good management

[[Page 38838]]

and accountability, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration's Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) will conduct 
an independent process evaluation of the PAIMI Program. CMHS will 
employ information that is routinely collected under existing program 
requirements and is also expected to collect new, additional data that 
are also necessary for the conduct of the evaluation. [On January 1, 
each eligible State protection and advocacy (P&A) system is required to 
transmit to the Secretary and head of the State Mental Health Agency, 
in which the system is located, a report describing its activities, 
accomplishments, and expenditures during the most recently completed 
fiscal year. None of the data collection activities described above 
will be redundant with these existing reporting requirements.] The 
evaluation plan includes gathering information about the PAIMI program 
from persons with different perspectives. Accordingly, CMHS proposes to 
proceed with the following new data collection activities:
    (1) Survey interviews with the Executive Directors of each of the 
Protection and Advocacy Grantees, as well as other staff whom they may 
ask to join them in these interviews to include:
    a. Characteristics and shared functions between the P&A Governing 
Board and the PAIMI Advisory Council.
    b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals and priorities.
    c. Federal support of the PAIMI program.
    d. Federal oversight of the PAIMI program.
    e. Organization and staffing of PAIMI responsibilities within the 
P&A.
    f. Procedures for quality management.
    g. Background of respondent.
    (2) Surveys of and focus groups with persons who receive services 
from PAIMI programs to include:
    a. Access to PAIMI services.
    b. Quality of services provided to clients.
    c. Satisfaction with services.
    d. Background of respondent.
    (3) Surveys of the Chairs of the Advisory Councils of each PAIMI 
Grantee to include:
    a. Characteristics and shared functions between the P&A Governing 
Board and the PAIMI Advisory Council.
    b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals and priorities and assessment 
of those priorities.
    c. Organization and staffing of PAIMI responsibilities within the 
P&A.
    d. Quality of services provided to clients.
    e. Background of respondent.
    (4) Surveys of the Program Directors of State Mental Health 
Authorities to include:
    a. Types of communication between the State Mental Health Authority 
and the PAIMI program.
    b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals and priorities and assessment 
of those priorities.
    c. Relationship between the State Mental Health Authority and the 
PAIMI program.
    d. Role of the PAIMI program in the mental health advocacy 
community.
    e. Background of respondent.
    (5) Survey of directors of other organizations who are likely to be 
familiar with or collaborate in PAIMI activities in each State; 
including family and consumer groups and other mental health advocacy 
organizations to include:
    a. Types of interaction between the State Mental Health Authority 
and the PAIMI program.
    b. Processes to establish PAIMI goals and priorities and assessment 
of those priorities.
    c. Relationship between the organization and the PAIMI program.
    d. Access to and quality of services provided to PAIMI recipients.
    e. Role of the PAIMI program in the mental health advocacy 
community.
    f. Background of respondent.
    The PAIMI program has never undergone an independent evaluation. 
The approach being used is to conduct survey interviews with a cross-
section of five primary Stakeholder groups connected to the PAIMI 
program, including Program Directors/staff, Clients/Recipients of 
services, PAIMI Advisory Council Chairs, Directors of State Mental 
Health Authorities, and Directors of Other Mental Health Advocacy 
Organizations in an effort to obtain a representative sample of 
viewpoints about the PAIMI program. The surveys have been developed to 
include questions relevant to each of the respective Stakeholder groups 
named above and range from 22 questions to as many as 88 questions. 
Depending on the Stakeholder group, respondent surveys are expected to 
take from thirty minutes up to two hours to complete.
    CMHS also intends to conduct an outcome evaluation of the PAIMI 
program. SAMHSA is soliciting comments on how best to conduct such an 
evaluation. Comments should address how an evaluation can be best 
designed to assess the impact of the program, as measured by its GPRA 
measures, SAMHSA's National Outcome Measures, and other outcome 
measures. Commenters are advised to refer to the OMB document ``What 
Constitutes Strong Evidence of a Program's Effectiveness?'', available 
at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part/index.html, for OMB guidance on 
program evaluations.
    The burden estimate for conducting the surveys under the evaluation 
plan for the PAIMI Program is as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     Hours per      Total hour
            Form name                 No. of       Responses per       Total         response         burden
                                    respondents     respondent       responses        (hours)         (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Executive Director Interview....              20               1              20               2              40
PAIMI Advisory Chair Survey.....              20               1              20               1              20
State Mental Health Director                  20               1              20               1              20
 Survey.........................
State Mental Health Legal                     20               1              20               1              20
 Counsel........................
Other Mental Health Advocacy Org              20               1              20               1              20
 Director Survey................
PAIMI Client Survey.............              72               1              72           \1/2\              36
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total...........................             172  ..............             172  ..............             156
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed 
information collection should be sent by August 15, 2007 to: SAMHSA 
Desk Officer, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management 
and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 
20503; due to potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of mail 
sent through the U.S. Postal Service, respondents are encouraged to 
submit comments by fax to: 202-395-6974.


[[Page 38839]]


    Dated: June 25, 2007.
Elaine Parry,
Acting Director, Office of Program Services.
 [FR Doc. E7-13714 Filed 7-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P