Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Extension of a Pilot Program for Position and Exercise Limits for Options on the iShares® Russell 2000® Index Fund, 38109-38110 [E7-13502]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 133 / Thursday, July 12, 2007 / Notices SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–56020; File No. SR–ISE– 2007–56] Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Extension of a Pilot Program for Position and Exercise Limits for Options on the iShares Russell 2000 Index Fund July 6, 2007. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on June 29, 2007, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (‘‘ISE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by ISE. The Exchange has filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4 which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to extend an existing pilot program that increases the position and exercise limits for options on the iShares Russell 2000 Index Fund (‘‘IWM’’) traded on the Exchange (‘‘IWM Pilot Program’’). The text of the proposed rule change is available at ISE, the Commission’s Public Reference Room, and https://www.iseoptions.com. rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, ISE included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. ISE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 2 17 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:42 Jul 11, 2007 Jkt 211001 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to extend the IWM Pilot Program for an additional six-month period, through January 18, 2008,5 and to make non-substantive changes to simplify the rule text describing the IWM Pilot Program. The IWM Pilot Program increases the position and exercise limits for IWM options traded on the Exchange.6 The Exchange is not proposing any other changes to the IWM Pilot Program. The Exchange represents that it has not encountered any problems or difficulties relating to the IWM Pilot Program since its inception. The proposal that established the IWM Pilot Program was designated by the Commission to be effective and operative upon filing and provided that it would run from January 22, 2007 through July 22, 2007.7 In that filing, the Exchange explained that in June 2005, as a result of a 2-for-1 stock split, the position limit for IWM options was temporarily increased from 250,000 contracts (covering 25,000,000 shares) to 500,000 contracts (covering 50,000,000 shares). At the time of the split, the furthest IWM option expiration date was January 2007. Therefore, the temporary increase of the IWM position limit would have reverted to the pre-split level (as provided for in connection with the Rule 412 Pilot Program) of 250,000 contracts after expiration in January 2007, or on January 22, 2007. The Exchange described in the proposal that established the IWM Pilot Program that a position limit of 250,000 contracts would prevent traders from adequately hedging their options positions, thereby impairing their ability to provide liquidity. Specifically, the Exchange stated that options on IWM are 1/10th the size of options on the Russell 2000 Index (‘‘RUT’’), which has a position limit of 50,000 contracts.8 Therefore, traders who trade IWM options to hedge positions in RUT options are likely to find a position limit of 250,000 contracts in IWM options too 5 January 18, 2008 is the third Friday of the month (or expiration Friday), which is the day on which January 2008 IWM options will expire. 6 Pursuant to ISE Rule 414, the exercise limit established under Rule 414 for IWM options shall be equivalent to the position limit prescribed for IWM options in Supplementary Material .01 to Rule 412. The increased exercise limits would only be in effect during the IWM Pilot Period. 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55175 (January 25, 2007), 72 FR 4753 (February 1, 2007) (SR–ISE–2007–07). 8 See ISE Rule 2004(a). PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38109 restrictive and insufficient to properly hedge. For example, if a trader held 50,000 RUT options and wanted to hedge that position with IWM options, the trader would, at a minimum, need 500,000 IWM options to properly hedge the position. Additionally, the Exchange notes that index options on 1/10th the RUT have a position limit of 500,000 contracts, which is consistent with and corresponds to the increased position limits permitted under the IWM Pilot Program.9 Therefore, the Exchange continues to believe that a position limit of 250,000 contracts is too low and may adversely affect market participants’ ability to provide liquidity in this product. As the Exchange also described in the proposal that established the IWM Pilot Program, IWM options have grown to become one of the largest options contracts in terms of trading volume. For example, through May 29, 2007, year-to-date industry volume in IWM options has averaged over 460,000 contracts per day, for a total of over 61 million contracts. Further, ISE alone has averaged more than 125,000 IWM option contracts per day during that time, for a total of almost 13 million contracts. In contrast, QQQQ options, which have a position limit of 900,000 contracts, have averaged almost 575,000 contracts per day. The Exchange believes that maintaining the increased position and exercise limits for IWM options will lead to a more liquid and more competitive market environment for IWM options that will benefit customers interested in trading this product. As a result, the Exchange requests that the Commission extend the pilot for an additional six-month period, through January 18, 2008. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,10 in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 9 Id. 10 15 E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 12JYN1 38110 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 133 / Thursday, July 12, 2007 / Notices C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others The Exchange has not solicited, and does no intend to solicit, comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested parties. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the forgoing rule change does not: (1) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (2) impose any significant burden on competition; and (3) become operative for 30 days after the date of this filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 11 and Rule 19b– 4(f)(6) thereunder.12 A proposed rule change filed under 19b–4(f)(6) normally may not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of filing.13 However, Rule 19b– 4(f)(6)(iii) 14 permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest because such waiver would permit position and exercise limits for options on IWM to continue at 500,000 option contracts for a six-month pilot period. For this reason, the Commission designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing with the Commission.15 At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public 11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 13 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) requires that a self-regulatory organization submit to the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied the fiveday pre-filing notice requirement. 14 Id. 15 For the purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES 12 17 VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:42 Jul 11, 2007 Jkt 211001 interest, for the protection of investors or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–ISE–2007–56 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.16 Florence E. Harmon, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E7–13502 Filed 7–11–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–56017; File No. SR–NYSE– 2007–21] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto and Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to Amendment No. 3 Thereto Relating to Rule 92 (Limitations on Members’ Trading Because of Customers’ Orders) July 5, 2007. I. Introduction On February 23, 2007, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities All submissions should refer to File and Exchange Commission Number SR–ISE–2007–56. This file (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 Commission process and review your thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will amend NYSE Rule 92, Limitations on post all comments on the Commission’s Members’ Trading Because of Customers’ Orders, in order to Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ harmonize it with similar rules of NASD rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the and to address changes to the submission, all subsequent marketplace because of the amendments, all written statements implementation of NYSE’s Hybrid with respect to the proposed rule Market and Regulation NMS (‘‘Reg. change that are filed with the NMS’’). On May 22, 2007, NYSE filed Commission, and all written Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule communications relating to the change. The proposed rule change was proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than published for comment in the Federal Register on May 31, 2007.3 The those that may be withheld from the Commission received two comment public in accordance with the letters on the proposal.4 On July 3, 2007, provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be NYSE responded to the comments 5 and, available for inspection and copying in on July 5, 2007, filed Amendment No. the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, 16 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). DC 20549, on official business days 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. Copies of the filing also will be available 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55804 for inspection and copying at the (May 23, 2007), 72 FR 30410. principal office of ISE. All comments 4 See letters to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, received will be posted without change; Commission, from Ann Vlcek, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, Securities Industry the Commission does not edit personal and Financial Markets Association (‘‘SIFMA’’), identifying information from dated June 22, 2007 (‘‘SIFMA Letter’’) and from Bret submissions. You should submit only Engelkemier, Managing Director, Head of Equity information that you wish to make Trading, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., dated June 21, 2007 (‘‘CGMI Letter’’). available publicly. All submissions 5 See letter to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, should refer to File Number SR–ISE– Yeager, Assistant 2007–56 and should be submitted on or Commission, from MaryJuly 3, 2007 (‘‘NYSE Secretary, NYSE, dated before August 2, 2007. Response’’). PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM 12JYN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 133 (Thursday, July 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38109-38110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-13502]



[[Page 38109]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-56020; File No. SR-ISE-2007-56]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, 
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule 
Change Relating to the Extension of a Pilot Program for Position and 
Exercise Limits for Options on the iShares[supreg] Russell 2000[supreg] 
Index Fund

July 6, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on June 29, 2007, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE'' 
or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and 
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by ISE. The 
Exchange has filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the 
Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal 
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing 
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from 
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to extend an existing pilot program that 
increases the position and exercise limits for options on the 
iShares[supreg] Russell 2000[supreg] Index Fund (``IWM'') traded on the 
Exchange (``IWM Pilot Program''). The text of the proposed rule change 
is available at ISE, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and http:/
/www.iseoptions.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, ISE included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. ISE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, 
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to extend the IWM Pilot 
Program for an additional six-month period, through January 18, 
2008,\5\ and to make non-substantive changes to simplify the rule text 
describing the IWM Pilot Program. The IWM Pilot Program increases the 
position and exercise limits for IWM options traded on the Exchange.\6\ 
The Exchange is not proposing any other changes to the IWM Pilot 
Program. The Exchange represents that it has not encountered any 
problems or difficulties relating to the IWM Pilot Program since its 
inception.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ January 18, 2008 is the third Friday of the month (or 
expiration Friday), which is the day on which January 2008 IWM 
options will expire.
    \6\ Pursuant to ISE Rule 414, the exercise limit established 
under Rule 414 for IWM options shall be equivalent to the position 
limit prescribed for IWM options in Supplementary Material .01 to 
Rule 412. The increased exercise limits would only be in effect 
during the IWM Pilot Period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposal that established the IWM Pilot Program was designated 
by the Commission to be effective and operative upon filing and 
provided that it would run from January 22, 2007 through July 22, 
2007.\7\ In that filing, the Exchange explained that in June 2005, as a 
result of a 2-for-1 stock split, the position limit for IWM options was 
temporarily increased from 250,000 contracts (covering 25,000,000 
shares) to 500,000 contracts (covering 50,000,000 shares). At the time 
of the split, the furthest IWM option expiration date was January 2007. 
Therefore, the temporary increase of the IWM position limit would have 
reverted to the pre-split level (as provided for in connection with the 
Rule 412 Pilot Program) of 250,000 contracts after expiration in 
January 2007, or on January 22, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55175 (January 25, 
2007), 72 FR 4753 (February 1, 2007) (SR-ISE-2007-07).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange described in the proposal that established the IWM 
Pilot Program that a position limit of 250,000 contracts would prevent 
traders from adequately hedging their options positions, thereby 
impairing their ability to provide liquidity. Specifically, the 
Exchange stated that options on IWM are 1/10th the size of options on 
the Russell 2000[supreg] Index (``RUT''), which has a position limit of 
50,000 contracts.\8\ Therefore, traders who trade IWM options to hedge 
positions in RUT options are likely to find a position limit of 250,000 
contracts in IWM options too restrictive and insufficient to properly 
hedge. For example, if a trader held 50,000 RUT options and wanted to 
hedge that position with IWM options, the trader would, at a minimum, 
need 500,000 IWM options to properly hedge the position. Additionally, 
the Exchange notes that index options on 1/10th the RUT have a position 
limit of 500,000 contracts, which is consistent with and corresponds to 
the increased position limits permitted under the IWM Pilot Program.\9\ 
Therefore, the Exchange continues to believe that a position limit of 
250,000 contracts is too low and may adversely affect market 
participants' ability to provide liquidity in this product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See ISE Rule 2004(a).
    \9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As the Exchange also described in the proposal that established the 
IWM Pilot Program, IWM options have grown to become one of the largest 
options contracts in terms of trading volume. For example, through May 
29, 2007, year-to-date industry volume in IWM options has averaged over 
460,000 contracts per day, for a total of over 61 million contracts. 
Further, ISE alone has averaged more than 125,000 IWM option contracts 
per day during that time, for a total of almost 13 million contracts. 
In contrast, QQQQ options, which have a position limit of 900,000 
contracts, have averaged almost 575,000 contracts per day.
    The Exchange believes that maintaining the increased position and 
exercise limits for IWM options will lead to a more liquid and more 
competitive market environment for IWM options that will benefit 
customers interested in trading this product. As a result, the Exchange 
requests that the Commission extend the pilot for an additional six-
month period, through January 18, 2008.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in 
that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, 
to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open 
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect 
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

[[Page 38110]]

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does no intend to solicit, 
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received 
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested 
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the forgoing rule change does not: (1) Significantly affect 
the protection of investors or the public interest; (2) impose any 
significant burden on competition; and (3) become operative for 30 days 
after the date of this filing, or such shorter time as the Commission 
may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 
of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under 19b-4(f)(6) normally may not 
become operative prior to 30 days after the date of filing.\13\ 
However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \14\ permits the Commission to designate 
a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of 
investors and the public interest. The Exchange has requested that the 
Commission waive the 30-day operative delay. The Commission believes 
that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest because such waiver 
would permit position and exercise limits for options on IWM to 
continue at 500,000 option contracts for a six-month pilot period. For 
this reason, the Commission designates the proposed rule change to be 
operative upon filing with the Commission.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) requires that a self-regulatory organization submit to 
the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed 
rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed 
rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing 
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by 
the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied the five-day pre-filing 
notice requirement.
    \14\ Id.
    \15\ For the purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative 
delay, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it 
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate 
in the public interest, for the protection of investors or otherwise in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-ISE-2007-56 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-56. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and 
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of ISE. All comments 
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit 
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-56 and should be 
submitted on or before August 2, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-13502 Filed 7-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.