Postponement of Preliminary Determination of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Sodium Hexametaphosphate from the People's Republic of China, 37728-37729 [E7-13378]

Download as PDF 37728 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 11, 2007 / Notices We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review if any Currency Conversion importer–specific assessment rate We made currency conversions into calculated in the final results of this U.S. dollars, in accordance with section review is above de minimis (i.e., at or 773A(a) of the Act, based on the above 0.50 percent). Pursuant to 19 CFR exchange rates in effect on the dates of 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to the U.S. sales, as certified by Dow Jones liquidate without regard to antidumping Reuters Business Interactive LLC duties any entries for which the (trading as Factiva). assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent). See 19 CFR Preliminary Results of Review 351.106(c)(1). The final results of this As a result of our review, we review shall be the basis for the preliminarily determine the weighted– assessment of antidumping duties on average dumping margin for the period entries of merchandise covered by the August 1, 2005, through July 16, 2006, final results of this review. to be as follows: The Department clarified its ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on Manufacturer / Exporter Margin (percent) May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and V&M do Brasil, S.A. ...... 0.00 Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 The Department will disclose FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment calculations performed in connection Policy Notice). This clarification will with these preliminary results of review apply to entries of subject merchandise within five days of the date of during the POR produced by companies publication of this notice in accordance included in these final results of review with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested for which the reviewed companies did parties may submit case briefs and/or not know that the merchandise they written comments no later than 30 days sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, after the date of publication of these trading company, or exporter) was preliminary results of review. Rebuttal destined for the United States. In such briefs and rebuttals to written instances, we will instruct CBP to comments, limited to issues raised in liquidate unreviewed entries at the ‘‘All the case briefs and comments, may be Others’’ rate if there is no rate for the filed no later than 35 days after the date intermediary involved in the of publication of this notice. Parties who transaction. See Assessment Policy submit argument in these proceedings Notice for a full discussion of this are requested to submit with the clarification. argument: 1) a statement of the issue, 2) a brief summary of the argument, and 3) Cash Deposit Requirements a table of authorities. An interested The Department notified CBP to party may request a hearing within 30 discontinue suspension of liquidation days of publication. See 19 CFR and collection of cash deposits on 351.310(c). Any hearing, if requested, entries of the subject merchandise will be held 2 days after the scheduled entered or withdrawn from warehouse date for the submission of rebuttal on or after July 16, 2006, the effective briefs. See 19 CFR 351.310(d). The date of revocation of the antidumping Department will issue the final results duty order. of these preliminary results, including Notification to Importers the results of our analysis of the issues raised in any such written comments or This notice also serves as a at a hearing, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results, preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding Act. the reimbursement of antidumping Assessment Rates duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review Upon completion of the period. Failure to comply with this administrative review, the Department requirement could result in the shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Secretary’s presumption that Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, reimbursement of antidumping duties antidumping duties on all appropriate occurred and the subsequent assessment entries, in accordance with 19 CFR of double antidumping duties. 351.212. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 We are issuing and publishing this days after the date of publication of the notice in accordance with sections final results of this review. 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES accordance with section 773(a)(7)(B) of the Act. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:56 Jul 10, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: July 2, 2007. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E7–13383 Filed 7–10–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–908] Postponement of Preliminary Determination of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Sodium Hexametaphosphate from the People’s Republic of China Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 11, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Begnal or Kristina Horgan, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1442 or (202) 482– 8173, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Postponement of Preliminary Determination On February 28, 2007, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) initiated the antidumping duty investigation of sodium hexametaphosphate from the People’s Republic of China. See Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Sodium Hexametaphosphate From the People’s Republic of China, 72 FR 9926 (March 6, 2007) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’); see also Notice of Correction of Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Sodium Hexametaphosphate from the People’s Republic of China, 72 FR 11325 (March 13, 2007). The notice of initiation stated that the Department would make its preliminary determination for this antidumping duty investigation no later than 140 days after the date of issuance of the initiation. On June 25, 2007, ICL Performance Products, LP and Innophos, Inc. (‘‘Petitioners’’) made a timely request pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(e) and section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’) for a postponement of the preliminary determination. Petitioners requested postponement of the preliminary determination to allow the Department additional time in which to review the complex questionnaire responses and E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM 11JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 11, 2007 / Notices issue requests for clarification and additional information. For the reasons identified by the Petitioners, and because there are no compelling reasons to deny the request, the Department is postponing the preliminary determination under section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, by 50 days to September 6, 2007. The deadline for the final determination will continue to be 75 days after the date of the preliminary determination, unless extended. This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 733(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). Dated: July 2, 2007. David Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E7–13378 Filed 7–10–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration University of Minnesota, et al., Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications for Duty–Free Entry of Scientific Instruments jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89– 651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5 P.M. in Room 2104, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. Comments: None received. Decisions: Approved. We know of no instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, for such purposes as each is intended to be used, was being manufactured in the United States at the time of its order. Docket Number: 07–025. Applicant: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455. Instrument: Confocal Raman Microscope. Manufacturer: Witec, Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 72 FR 33204, June 15, 20007. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides capability for distinguishing polymorphs in organic crystalline films, identifying components in polymer blends at the micron level, distinguishing components in complex biofilms, characterizing the surface composition of coated aerosol particles, etc. Precise mapping control through a piezo scan table, as well as high resolution and adaptation to different wavelengths of the laser are essential features. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:56 Jul 10, 2007 Jkt 211001 Docket Number: 07–034. Applicant: Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907–2054. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, The Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 72 FR 33204, June 15 2007. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides capability of high voltage electron microscopy. Docket Number: 07–035. Applicant: Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan Intended Use: See notice at 72 FR 33204. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides capability of high voltage electron microscopy. The capabilities of each of the foreign instruments describedabove are pertinent to each applicant’s intended purposes and we know of no other instrument or apparatus being manufactured in the United States which is of equivalent scientific value to any of the foreign instruments. Faye Robinson, Director,Statutory Import Programs Staff, Import Administration. [FR Doc. E7–13477 Filed 7–10–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 37729 1, Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–1174 or (202) 482–0182, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 20, 2007, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published the preliminary results of the administrative reviews of the countervailing duty orders on pure magnesium and alloy magnesium from Canada for the period January 1, 2005, through August 15, 2005. See Pure Magnesium and Alloy Magnesium from Canada: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 72 FR 19881 (April 20, 2007) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. (‘‘NHCI’’) submitted a case brief on May 7, 2007. In its case brief, NHCI agreed with the Department’s Preliminary Results with respect to NHCI. US Magnesium LLC (‘‘the petitioner’’) did not file a case or rebuttal brief. Scope of the Orders DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–122–815] Pure Magnesium and Alloy Magnesium from Canada: Final Results of 2005 Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On April 20, 2007, the Department of Commerce published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the administrative reviews of the countervailing duty orders on pure magnesium and alloy magnesium from Canada for the period January 1, 2005, through August 15, 2005. We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the preliminary results. Our analysis of the comments received on the preliminary results did not lead to any changes in the net subsidy rate. Therefore, the final results do not differ from the preliminary results. The final net subsidy rate for the reviewed company is listed below in the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of Reviews.’’ EFFECTIVE DATE: July 11, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew McAllister or Brandon Farlander, AD/CVD Operations, Office AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The products covered by these orders are shipments of pure and alloy magnesium from Canada. Pure magnesium contains at least 99.8 percent magnesium by weight and is sold in various slab and ingot forms and sizes. Magnesium alloys contain less than 99.8 percent magnesium by weight with magnesium being the largest metallic element in the alloy by weight, and are sold in various ingot and billet forms and sizes. The pure and alloy magnesium subject to the orders is currently classifiable under items 8104.11.0000 and 8104.19.0000, respectively, of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written descriptions of the merchandise subject to the orders are dispositive. Secondary and granular magnesium are not included in the scope of these orders. Our reasons for excluding granular magnesium are summarized in Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure and Alloy Magnesium From Canada, 57 FR 6094 (February 20, 1992). Period of Reviews The period for which we are measuring subsidies, or POR, is January 1, 2005, through August 15, 2005. E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM 11JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37728-37729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-13378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-908]


Postponement of Preliminary Determination of Antidumping Duty 
Investigation: Sodium Hexametaphosphate from the People's Republic of 
China

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 11, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Begnal or Kristina Horgan, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: (202) 482-1442 or (202) 482-8173, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Postponement of Preliminary Determination

    On February 28, 2007, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') 
initiated the antidumping duty investigation of sodium 
hexametaphosphate from the People's Republic of China. See Initiation 
of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Sodium Hexametaphosphate From the 
People's Republic of China, 72 FR 9926 (March 6, 2007) (``Initiation 
Notice''); see also Notice of Correction of Initiation of Antidumping 
Duty Investigation: Sodium Hexametaphosphate from the People's Republic 
of China, 72 FR 11325 (March 13, 2007). The notice of initiation stated 
that the Department would make its preliminary determination for this 
antidumping duty investigation no later than 140 days after the date of 
issuance of the initiation.
    On June 25, 2007, ICL Performance Products, LP and Innophos, Inc. 
(``Petitioners'') made a timely request pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(e) 
and section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the 
Act'') for a postponement of the preliminary determination. Petitioners 
requested postponement of the preliminary determination to allow the 
Department additional time in which to review the complex questionnaire 
responses and

[[Page 37729]]

issue requests for clarification and additional information.
    For the reasons identified by the Petitioners, and because there 
are no compelling reasons to deny the request, the Department is 
postponing the preliminary determination under section 733(c)(1)(A) of 
the Act, by 50 days to September 6, 2007. The deadline for the final 
determination will continue to be 75 days after the date of the 
preliminary determination, unless extended.
    This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 733(c)(2) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).

    Dated: July 2, 2007.
David Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-13378 Filed 7-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S