Form Tech Industries, LLC, Canal Fulton, OH; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 36731-36732 [E7-12913]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 128 / Thursday, July 5, 2007 / Notices Schedule Drug 3,4-Methylenedioxy-Nethylamphetamine (7404). 3,4-Methylenedioxy methamphetamine (MDMA) (7405). 1-[1-(2Thienyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine (TCP) (7470). 1-Benzylpiperazine (BZP) (7493) Heroin (9200) ............................... Normorphine (9313) ..................... Amphetamine (1100) .................... Methamphetamine (1105) ............ Nabilone (7379) ............................ 1–Phenylcyclohexylamine (7460) Phencyclidine (7471) .................... Cocaine (9041) ............................. Codeine (9050) ............................. Diprenorphine (9058) ................... Ecgonine (9180) ........................... Levomethorphan (9210) ............... Levorphanol (9220) ...................... Meperidine (9230) ........................ Metazocine (9240) ........................ Methadone (9250) ........................ Morphine (9300) ........................... Thebaine (9333) ........................... Levo-alphacetylmethadol (9648) .. Carfentanil (9743) ......................... Fentanyl (9801) ............................ Employment and Training Administration I [TA–W–61,298] I American Manufacturing International, Inc. Patterson, NJ; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration; Correction I I I II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II ACTION: Correction sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Dated: June 26, 2007. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration. [FR Doc. E7–12971 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 18:43 Jul 03, 2007 Jkt 211001 Notice; correction. SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration published a document in the Federal Register on May 30, 2007, concerning a Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration. The office restructured a paragraph for clarification purposes. The company plans to manufacture reference standards. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections being sent via regular mail should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), Washington, DC 20537, or any being sent via express mail should be sent to Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 2401 Jefferson Davis Highway, Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be filed no later than September 4, 2007. VerDate Aug<31>2005 Correction. In the Federal Register of June 14, 2007, in FR Doc. E7–11479, on page 32914, in the third column, correct the ‘‘text’’ caption to read: DEPARTMENT OF LABOR I 36731 In the Federal Register of May 30, 2007, in FR Doc. E7–10310, on page 30029, in the first and second column, correct the ‘‘text’’ caption to read: Since the total number of separated workers was one during the relevant period, workers of American Manufacturing International, Inc., Patterson, New Jersey do not meet the group eligibility requirements for trade adjustment assistance. Signed in Washington, DC, this 27th day of June 2007. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–12914 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P All workers of Armstrong Wood Products, Inc., Armstrong Hardwood Flooring Company, Parquet Flooring Department, Oneida, Tennessee [TA–W–60,876], who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after March 17, 2007 through two years from the date of this certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. and All workers of Armstrong Wood Products, Inc., Armstrong Hardwood Flooring Company, Pattern Plus Flooring Department, Oneida, Tennessee [TA–W–60,876B], who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after January 31, 2006 through two years from the date of this certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed in Washington DC this 27th day of June 2007. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–12911 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–61,281] DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Form Tech Industries, LLC, Canal Fulton, OH; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–60,876 and TA–W–60,876B] Armstrong Wood Products, Inc., Armstrong Hardwood Flooring Company, Parquet Flooring Department and Pattern Plus Flooring Department, Oneida, TN; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration; Correction ACTION: Notice; correction. SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration published a document in the Federal Register on June 14, 2007, concerning a Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration. The document contained an incorrect date. PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 By application dated June 12, 2007, the United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 1112 requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was signed on May 9, 2007 and published in the Federal Register on May 24, 2007 (72 FR 29182). The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the finding that imports of machine parts, such as shafts and sheaves for CVT E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM 05JYN1 36732 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 128 / Thursday, July 5, 2007 / Notices transmissions did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm and no shift of production to a foreign source occurred. The Department reviewed the request for reconsideration and has determined that the petitioner has provided additional information. Therefore, the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974. Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed in Washington, DC, this 27th day of June, 2007. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–12913 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–60,825] sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Golden Ratio Woodworks, Emigrant, MT; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration On June 11, 2007, the Department of Labor (Department) issued an Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers and former workers of Golden Ratio Woodworks, Emigrant, Montana (the subject firm). The Department’s Notice of affirmative determination was published in the Federal Register on June 20, 2007 (72 FR 34047). The negative determination was issued on May 1, 2007. The Department’s Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on May 17, 2007 (72 FR 27855). Workers produce massage tables, chairs, and accessories. The negative determination was based on the Department’s findings that production at the subject firm ceased to operate in January 2007, that the subject firm did not shift production abroad, and that the subject firm’s major declining customers’ imports did not contribute importantly to workers’ separations. In the request for reconsideration, the workers alleged that increased subject firm imports and increased foreign VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:43 Jul 03, 2007 Jkt 211001 competition contributed to workers’ separations. On reconsideration, the Department received information that confirmed that the subject firm licensed the patents to another company to produce articles previously produced at the subject facility. During the reconsideration investigation, the Department received new information from the company official regarding the status of the subject firm and the relationship between the subject firm and the company licensed to produce the subject firm’s products (hereafter referred to as ‘‘the partner’’). The subject firm did not cease to exist, but has entered into an agreement with the partner. In this relationship, the subject firm sells its products and the partner produces them under the ‘‘Golden Ratio’’ brand at its manufacturing facilities. During the reconsideration investigation, the Department also received information that the subject firm separated all production workers, that production ceased absolutely, and that a significant majority of the production at the subject firm was replaced with articles produced in China. In accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department herein presents the results of its investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply for ATAA. The Department has determined in this case that the group eligibility requirements of Section 246 have been met. A significant number of workers at the firm are age 50 or over and possess skills that are not easily transferable. Competitive conditions within the industry are adverse. Conclusion After careful review of the information obtained in the reconsideration investigation, I determine that workers of Golden Ratio Woodworks, Emigrant, Montana, qualify as adversely affected workers under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: All workers of Golden Ratio Woodworks, Emigrant, Montana, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after January 23, 2006, through two years from the date of this certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of June 2007. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–12909 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration TA–W–60,835, Kimberly Clark Corporation, Kimberly Clark WorldWide, Neenah, Wisconsin. TA–W–60,835A, Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Roswell, Georgia. TA–W–60,835B, Kimberly Clark World-Wide, Roswell, Georgia. TA–W–60,835C, Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Knoxville, Tennessee. TA–W–60,835D, Kimberly Clark World-Wide, Knoxville, Tennessee. TA–W–60,835E, Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Irving, Texas. On May 29, 2007, the Department of Labor (Department) issued an Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for workers and former workers of several Kimberly Clark Corporation (the subject firm) locations: Kimberly Clark WorldWide, Neenah, Wisconsin [TA–W– 60,835]; Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Roswell, Georgia [TA–W–60,835A]; Kimberly Clark World-Wide, Roswell, Georgia [TA–W–60,835B]; Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Knoxville, Tennessee [TA–W–60,835C]; Kimberly Clark World-Wide, Knoxville, Tennessee [TA–W–60,835D]; and Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Irving, Texas [TA–W–60,835E]. The Department’s Notice of Affirmative Determination was published in the Federal Register on June 7, 2007 (72 FR 31612). Workers provided administrative support to various affiliated subject firm facilities. The negative determination regarding the subject workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) stated that the worker separations are not caused by imports but by the subject firm’s decision to outsource administrative support positions, and that the separations cannot be directly attributed to imports or a shift in production of an article. The determination also states that workers at Kimberly Clark Corporation, Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, Neenah, Wisconsin are eligible to E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM 05JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 128 (Thursday, July 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36731-36732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-12913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,281]


Form Tech Industries, LLC, Canal Fulton, OH; Notice of 
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated June 12, 2007, the United Automobile, 
Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 1112 
requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's 
Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers and former workers 
of the subject firm. The determination was signed on May 9, 2007 and 
published in the Federal Register on May 24, 2007 (72 FR 29182).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that imports of machine parts, such as shafts and 
sheaves for CVT

[[Page 36732]]

transmissions did not contribute importantly to worker separations at 
the subject firm and no shift of production to a foreign source 
occurred.
    The Department reviewed the request for reconsideration and has 
determined that the petitioner has provided additional information. 
Therefore, the Department will conduct further investigation to 
determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade 
Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 27th day of June, 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-12913 Filed 7-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.