Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 36732-36733 [E7-12910]
Download as PDF
36732
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 128 / Thursday, July 5, 2007 / Notices
transmissions did not contribute
importantly to worker separations at the
subject firm and no shift of production
to a foreign source occurred.
The Department reviewed the request
for reconsideration and has determined
that the petitioner has provided
additional information. Therefore, the
Department will conduct further
investigation to determine if the workers
meet the eligibility requirements of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. The application
is, therefore, granted.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 27th day of
June, 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–12913 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,825]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Golden Ratio Woodworks, Emigrant,
MT; Notice of Revised Determination
on Reconsideration
On June 11, 2007, the Department of
Labor (Department) issued an
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration for the
workers and former workers of Golden
Ratio Woodworks, Emigrant, Montana
(the subject firm). The Department’s
Notice of affirmative determination was
published in the Federal Register on
June 20, 2007 (72 FR 34047).
The negative determination was
issued on May 1, 2007. The
Department’s Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
on May 17, 2007 (72 FR 27855). Workers
produce massage tables, chairs, and
accessories.
The negative determination was based
on the Department’s findings that
production at the subject firm ceased to
operate in January 2007, that the subject
firm did not shift production abroad,
and that the subject firm’s major
declining customers’ imports did not
contribute importantly to workers’
separations.
In the request for reconsideration, the
workers alleged that increased subject
firm imports and increased foreign
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:43 Jul 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
competition contributed to workers’
separations.
On reconsideration, the Department
received information that confirmed
that the subject firm licensed the patents
to another company to produce articles
previously produced at the subject
facility.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department received
new information from the company
official regarding the status of the
subject firm and the relationship
between the subject firm and the
company licensed to produce the
subject firm’s products (hereafter
referred to as ‘‘the partner’’). The subject
firm did not cease to exist, but has
entered into an agreement with the
partner. In this relationship, the subject
firm sells its products and the partner
produces them under the ‘‘Golden
Ratio’’ brand at its manufacturing
facilities.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department also
received information that the subject
firm separated all production workers,
that production ceased absolutely, and
that a significant majority of the
production at the subject firm was
replaced with articles produced in
China.
In accordance with Section 246 the
Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as
amended, the Department herein
presents the results of its investigation
regarding certification of eligibility to
apply for ATAA. The Department has
determined in this case that the group
eligibility requirements of Section 246
have been met.
A significant number of workers at the
firm are age 50 or over and possess
skills that are not easily transferable.
Competitive conditions within the
industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
information obtained in the
reconsideration investigation, I
determine that workers of Golden Ratio
Woodworks, Emigrant, Montana, qualify
as adversely affected workers under
Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended.
In accordance with the provisions of
the Act, I make the following
certification:
All workers of Golden Ratio Woodworks,
Emigrant, Montana, who became totally or
partially separated from employment on or
after January 23, 2006, through two years
from the date of this certification, are eligible
to apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of
June 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–12909 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Negative Determination on
Reconsideration
TA–W–60,835, Kimberly Clark
Corporation, Kimberly Clark WorldWide, Neenah, Wisconsin.
TA–W–60,835A, Kimberly Clark
Global Sales, Roswell, Georgia.
TA–W–60,835B, Kimberly Clark
World-Wide, Roswell, Georgia.
TA–W–60,835C, Kimberly Clark
Global Sales, Knoxville, Tennessee.
TA–W–60,835D, Kimberly Clark
World-Wide, Knoxville, Tennessee.
TA–W–60,835E, Kimberly Clark
Global Sales, Irving, Texas.
On May 29, 2007, the Department of
Labor (Department) issued an
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration for
workers and former workers of several
Kimberly Clark Corporation (the subject
firm) locations: Kimberly Clark WorldWide, Neenah, Wisconsin [TA–W–
60,835]; Kimberly Clark Global Sales,
Roswell, Georgia [TA–W–60,835A];
Kimberly Clark World-Wide, Roswell,
Georgia [TA–W–60,835B]; Kimberly
Clark Global Sales, Knoxville,
Tennessee [TA–W–60,835C]; Kimberly
Clark World-Wide, Knoxville,
Tennessee [TA–W–60,835D]; and
Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Irving,
Texas [TA–W–60,835E].
The Department’s Notice of
Affirmative Determination was
published in the Federal Register on
June 7, 2007 (72 FR 31612). Workers
provided administrative support to
various affiliated subject firm facilities.
The negative determination regarding
the subject workers’ eligibility to apply
for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) stated that the
worker separations are not caused by
imports but by the subject firm’s
decision to outsource administrative
support positions, and that the
separations cannot be directly attributed
to imports or a shift in production of an
article. The determination also states
that workers at Kimberly Clark
Corporation, Kimberly-Clark Global
Sales, Neenah, Wisconsin are eligible to
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 128 / Thursday, July 5, 2007 / Notices
apply for TAA and ATAA under TA–
W–60,017 (expires September 26, 2008).
In the request for reconsideration,
counsel for the subject firm alleged that
the petitioning worker groups either had
a direct link to or directly supported
production at affiliated certified
production facilities. The request also
states that the separated workers are
members of several groups within
Kimberly Clark—Consumer Sales,
Corporate Innovation, Finance and
Accounting, and Sourcing and Supply
Management.
Subject firm counsel asserts that
workers in the Consumer Sales group
are directly linked to TAA-certified
production facilities because they are
engaged in the sale of the articles
produced at those facilities.
Subject firm counsel also asserts that
workers in the Corporate Innovations
group directly support production at
TAA-certified subject firm facilities by
responding to consumer complaints and
providing feedback to other groups who
use the feedback to improve the articles,
and by engaging in the research and
development of articles produced at
TAA-certified subject firm facilities.
Subject firm counsel notes in the
request for reconsideration that several
workers in the Corporate Innovations
group are eligible to apply for TAA and
ATAA under TA–W–60,017.
The request for reconsideration
asserts that workers in the Finance and
Accounting group directly support
production at the subject firm’s facilities
because they are engaged in accounting
and financing activities that ensure the
continuous operation of subject firm
production facilities.
The request for reconsideration also
asserts that workers in the Sourcing and
Supply Management group directly
support production at the subject firm’s
facilities because they procure
materials, equipment, and services
required for production at these
facilities, and because they are engaged
in commodity management related to
articles produced by the subject firm.
The workers separated from the
subject firm are categorized as follows:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
World-Wide, Neenah, Wisconsin [TA–
W–60,835]
The one worker separated at this site
is a member of the Corporate
Innovations group.
Global Sales, Roswell, Georgia [TA–W–
60,835A]
One worker separated at this site is a
member of the Consumer Sales group
and five workers separated at this site
are members of the Corporate
Innovations group.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:43 Jul 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
World-Wide, Roswell, Georgia [TA–W–
60,835B]
The five workers separated at this site
are members of the Corporate
Innovations group.
Global Sales, Knoxville, Tennessee
[TA–W–60,835C]
One worker separated at this site is a
member the Consumer Sales group,
forty-three workers separated at this site
are members of the Finance and
Accounting group, and four workers
separated at this site are members of the
Sourcing and Supply Management
group.
World-Wide, Knoxville, Tennessee [TA–
W–60,835D]
The one worker separated at this site
is a member of the Corporate
Innovations group.
Global Sales, Irving, Texas [TA–W–
60,835E]
The five workers separated at this site
are members of the Consumer Sales
group.
The request for reconsideration also
stated that, contrary to the Department’s
initial findings, the separated workers’
positions were not outsourced but were
eliminated as a result of decreased
subject firm production.
Although the Department contacted
the subject firm during the
reconsideration investigation to request
additional information, no new
information was provided.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the available material, and has
determined that there is no evidence
that the Department failed to consider
any relevant fact or that the Department
erred in its interpretation of the facts. As
such, the Department affirms the
negative determination applicable to
subject firms workers at Kimberly Clark
World-Wide, Neenah, Wisconsin [TA–
W–60,835]; Kimberly Clark Global
Sales, Roswell, Georgia [TA–W–
60,835A]; Kimberly Clark World-Wide,
Roswell, Georgia [TA–W–60,835B];
Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Knoxville,
Tennessee [TA–W–60,835C]; Kimberly
Clark World-Wide, Knoxville,
Tennessee [TA–W–60,835D]; and
Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Irving,
Texas [TA–W–60,835E].
In order for the Department to issue
a certification of eligibility to apply for
ATAA, the subject worker group must
be certified eligible to apply for TAA.
Since the subject workers are denied
eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers
cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36733
Conclusion
After careful reconsideration, I affirm
the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of Kimberly
Clark Corporation located at Kimberly
Clark World-Wide, Neenah, Wisconsin
[TA–W–60,835]; Kimberly Clark Global
Sales, Roswell, Georgia [TA–W–
60,835A]; Kimberly Clark World-Wide,
Roswell, Georgia [TA–W–60,835B];
Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Knoxville,
Tennessee [TA–W–60,835C]; Kimberly
Clark World-Wide, Knoxville,
Tennessee [TA–W–60,835D]; and
Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Irving,
Texas [TA–W–60,835E].
Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of
June 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner;
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–12910 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–61,623]
Mahle Inc., Holland, MI; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on June 5,
2007 in response to a petition filed by
a company official on behalf of workers
at MAHLE Inc., Holland, Michigan.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day
of June, 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–12907 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–61,234]
Penn Mould Industries, Inc.,
Washington, PA; Notice of Revised
Determination on Reconsideration
By letter dated June 11, 2007 the
United Steelworkers of America, District
10 requested administrative
reconsideration regarding the
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 128 (Thursday, July 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36732-36733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-12910]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration
TA-W-60,835, Kimberly Clark Corporation, Kimberly Clark World-Wide,
Neenah, Wisconsin.
TA-W-60,835A, Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Roswell, Georgia.
TA-W-60,835B, Kimberly Clark World-Wide, Roswell, Georgia.
TA-W-60,835C, Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Knoxville, Tennessee.
TA-W-60,835D, Kimberly Clark World-Wide, Knoxville, Tennessee.
TA-W-60,835E, Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Irving, Texas.
On May 29, 2007, the Department of Labor (Department) issued an
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for
workers and former workers of several Kimberly Clark Corporation (the
subject firm) locations: Kimberly Clark World-Wide, Neenah, Wisconsin
[TA-W-60,835]; Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Roswell, Georgia [TA-W-
60,835A]; Kimberly Clark World-Wide, Roswell, Georgia [TA-W-60,835B];
Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Knoxville, Tennessee [TA-W-60,835C];
Kimberly Clark World-Wide, Knoxville, Tennessee [TA-W-60,835D]; and
Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Irving, Texas [TA-W-60,835E].
The Department's Notice of Affirmative Determination was published
in the Federal Register on June 7, 2007 (72 FR 31612). Workers provided
administrative support to various affiliated subject firm facilities.
The negative determination regarding the subject workers'
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) stated that the worker
separations are not caused by imports but by the subject firm's
decision to outsource administrative support positions, and that the
separations cannot be directly attributed to imports or a shift in
production of an article. The determination also states that workers at
Kimberly Clark Corporation, Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, Neenah,
Wisconsin are eligible to
[[Page 36733]]
apply for TAA and ATAA under TA-W-60,017 (expires September 26, 2008).
In the request for reconsideration, counsel for the subject firm
alleged that the petitioning worker groups either had a direct link to
or directly supported production at affiliated certified production
facilities. The request also states that the separated workers are
members of several groups within Kimberly Clark--Consumer Sales,
Corporate Innovation, Finance and Accounting, and Sourcing and Supply
Management.
Subject firm counsel asserts that workers in the Consumer Sales
group are directly linked to TAA-certified production facilities
because they are engaged in the sale of the articles produced at those
facilities.
Subject firm counsel also asserts that workers in the Corporate
Innovations group directly support production at TAA-certified subject
firm facilities by responding to consumer complaints and providing
feedback to other groups who use the feedback to improve the articles,
and by engaging in the research and development of articles produced at
TAA-certified subject firm facilities. Subject firm counsel notes in
the request for reconsideration that several workers in the Corporate
Innovations group are eligible to apply for TAA and ATAA under TA-W-
60,017.
The request for reconsideration asserts that workers in the Finance
and Accounting group directly support production at the subject firm's
facilities because they are engaged in accounting and financing
activities that ensure the continuous operation of subject firm
production facilities.
The request for reconsideration also asserts that workers in the
Sourcing and Supply Management group directly support production at the
subject firm's facilities because they procure materials, equipment,
and services required for production at these facilities, and because
they are engaged in commodity management related to articles produced
by the subject firm.
The workers separated from the subject firm are categorized as
follows:
World-Wide, Neenah, Wisconsin [TA-W-60,835]
The one worker separated at this site is a member of the Corporate
Innovations group.
Global Sales, Roswell, Georgia [TA-W-60,835A]
One worker separated at this site is a member of the Consumer Sales
group and five workers separated at this site are members of the
Corporate Innovations group.
World-Wide, Roswell, Georgia [TA-W-60,835B]
The five workers separated at this site are members of the
Corporate Innovations group.
Global Sales, Knoxville, Tennessee [TA-W-60,835C]
One worker separated at this site is a member the Consumer Sales
group, forty-three workers separated at this site are members of the
Finance and Accounting group, and four workers separated at this site
are members of the Sourcing and Supply Management group.
World-Wide, Knoxville, Tennessee [TA-W-60,835D]
The one worker separated at this site is a member of the Corporate
Innovations group.
Global Sales, Irving, Texas [TA-W-60,835E]
The five workers separated at this site are members of the Consumer
Sales group.
The request for reconsideration also stated that, contrary to the
Department's initial findings, the separated workers' positions were
not outsourced but were eliminated as a result of decreased subject
firm production.
Although the Department contacted the subject firm during the
reconsideration investigation to request additional information, no new
information was provided.
The Department has carefully reviewed the available material, and
has determined that there is no evidence that the Department failed to
consider any relevant fact or that the Department erred in its
interpretation of the facts. As such, the Department affirms the
negative determination applicable to subject firms workers at Kimberly
Clark World-Wide, Neenah, Wisconsin [TA-W-60,835]; Kimberly Clark
Global Sales, Roswell, Georgia [TA-W-60,835A]; Kimberly Clark World-
Wide, Roswell, Georgia [TA-W-60,835B]; Kimberly Clark Global Sales,
Knoxville, Tennessee [TA-W-60,835C]; Kimberly Clark World-Wide,
Knoxville, Tennessee [TA-W-60,835D]; and Kimberly Clark Global Sales,
Irving, Texas [TA-W-60,835E].
In order for the Department to issue a certification of eligibility
to apply for ATAA, the subject worker group must be certified eligible
to apply for TAA. Since the subject workers are denied eligibility to
apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
Conclusion
After careful reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of
negative determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance for workers and former workers of Kimberly Clark Corporation
located at Kimberly Clark World-Wide, Neenah, Wisconsin [TA-W-60,835];
Kimberly Clark Global Sales, Roswell, Georgia [TA-W-60,835A]; Kimberly
Clark World-Wide, Roswell, Georgia [TA-W-60,835B]; Kimberly Clark
Global Sales, Knoxville, Tennessee [TA-W-60,835C]; Kimberly Clark
World-Wide, Knoxville, Tennessee [TA-W-60,835D]; and Kimberly Clark
Global Sales, Irving, Texas [TA-W-60,835E].
Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of June 2007.
Elliott S. Kushner;
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-12910 Filed 7-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P